Bitcoin Forum

Craig Wright the man who claims to be the creator of bitcoin (Satoshi Nakamoto) warned bitcoin and bitcoin cash to stop using the bitcoin database so that they could avoid a potential lawsuit!

Wright claims the bitcoin and bitcoin cash is violating the law under Bitcoin’s original EULA and MIT License.

He said in his personal blog posts that he is going to take back the control of bitcoin.
Read info Here :
https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/forking-and-passing-off/

https://i.imgur.com/M2l3Wy1.png


“As the creator of Bitcoin, I maintain the sui generis rights to any copy of the database created from Genesis in January 2009. I shall not be relinquishing the ownership. I will be licensing it, and have already engaged in a process.” -Craig Wright


Reference:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-threatens-btc-core-and-bch-with-potential-lawsuits

If and only if he stick to his real creation which are the bitcoin forks, I think Craig Wright should have a more peaceful life as of now. His will to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto makes him more fraudulent to the eyes of those who didn't believe in him and it just makes the market complicated for newbies to be exposed to someone like him.

Craig Wright couldn't even prove his ownership of the private key and address of the genesis block which is quite the most simplest way to prove that he's the real Satoshi.

If he keeps on making too much drama, I hope he end up having his hard work for his forks to be in waste.

He is just making another noice to stay relevant. Instead of threatening bitcoin and its other fellow fork coin, he should just worry about his own ongoing case. He can't even prove that he is the real Satoshi. I would rather ignore whatever he says. Besides, how many times does he have to make a threat? I'm guessing even roger ver is laughing right now with craig's latest.

Good old patent trolling and attention whoring - just what you'd expect from this slimeball known as Craig Wright. There's absolutely zero chance that anyone will recognize his "rights", he's doing it purely to get attention and scare the noobs who easily believe everything what they read on their news. Imo CWS should be at least fined if not thrown to jail for wasting governments time and resources on his court battles, patent claims and just committing identity theft, as well as manipulating the market of his pet shitcoin bsv.

This person is digging his grave larger. He has misled the court and the court is about to take actions against him. And this would be a testimony for any further lawsuits that Craig Wright is a mentally unstable liar. Though if he needed to make a lawsuit against Bitcoin and Bitcoincash, he should start with himself as he is the creator of Bitcoin.

This is a very stupid move on the part of Craig Wright. Not only can he prove in court that Satoshi Nakamoto is, but recent events in court practically refute this. The judge gave him the opportunity until the first of February to provide evidence of the management of Nakamoto's wallets. His lawyer said Craig Wright could not do this. After that, such a statement of his looks very strange. He sets up the public against himself. Very stupid of him.

This man... after ver made a hard fork of bitcoin, and now that he already made a hard fork from a hard fork and claiming it as the real bitcoin. After the whitepaper, and now... come on.

What is crazier about this is that he "warned bitcoin"

How does someone "warn" bitcoin? Did he tried some email like ceo@bitcoin.com to contact? lol

This is wjhat is amazing about bitcoin. Nobody is in charge, there is no one to warn, there is on one to process or to make a lawsuit against.

He can do whatever he wants lmao, he will take control back of Bitcoin? Haha, that's what the real Satoshi would never say. Satoshi disappeared and made so many efforts so he could create an uncontrollable blockchain and he would take it back because some stupid laws says it's Bitcoin is violating laws? Hahaha.

as far as i know when something is released under MIT license it means anybody is free to copy the code without needing any kind of permissions whatsoever.
in other words this is just another bullshit out of a big scammer who has been getting forgotten by the media so he made some noise again to remain in it!

Funny when someone who has provided forged documents in court and created a coin with a plagiarized whitepaper calls out someone for stealing "his work" which he never proved is his.

Start a lawsuit trying to prove something about what you can't even prove you own. This is just stupid AF. I'm still waiting for that first picture of him in the jail cell. This boy is apparently too addicted to lying.

Imagine Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, minted a million Bitcoins, disappeared to 'move on to other projects', lost all of his private keys, lost his GPG key, lost access to any known email address and now comes back to sue 'Bitcoin' and all of its forks. If this was real, Satoshi is a lonely mother fraggin idiot! Hmmmmm, I guess it's not real and Craig Wright is a lonely mother fraggin idiot.  ::)

you gotta read between the lines, there will never be a lawsuit. he is just an attention whore who needs to pull something like this every now and then or he is going to be forgotten as the idiot who tried to scam people and was laughed at.
but this way, we keep talking about him every damn day! imagine if news sites agreed not to mention him ever in any of their articles. then it would be as if he doesn't even exist.

Such a long blog post by him but what bothers me is why would he even file a lawsuit regarding bitcoin when he can't even prove himself as the real Satoshi Nakamoto? He's just wasting his time and efforts because obviously, he won't win that lawsuit because he doesn't even have ownership of Bitcoin. He can't even give enough proof on the court. That's nonsense.

"As the sole creator of Bitcoin, I own full rights to the Bitcoin registry."
The audacity to claim himself as Satoshi. Since when did he have the right to own the creation of Bitcoin? I wasn't informed.

What a troll attention seeker trying hard to earn something that he didn't even made.
This nonsense is getting deeper and deeper just like making his own grave.
I can only see why he's so desperate to own Bitcoin maybe because he wants Satoshi to come out. lol
Just a little longer and we will finally gonna see him behind bars, just let him do whatever he wants to do right now.  :)

How can he even warn bitcoin to stop doing something. Bitcoin is not a person nor a company.

Next headline: Craig Wright sends a warning to the Internet to stop laughing at him and warns blockchain that it should stop processing Bitcoin transactions or he will sue.

Maybe suing isn't the best choice since Craig usually loses in court :D

// Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
// SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
// OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
// FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
// IN THE SOFTWARE.


The guy is a absolute fraud and I hope the community will rally against his fraudulent claims to the rights of bitcoin the above notice is the statement included in the November 16, 2008 release by the REAL Satoshi Nakamoto..

Craig has NO right's to ANY database used in bitcoin or any of the software.
Craig is a fraud and has NO access to the Satoshi PGP key
Craig HAS Lied to 1000's of people including US Courts.
Craig IS NOT SATOSHI....

Date : November 16, 2008
MD5: 6884e5046285913c1a93ae071bcc763a
SHA1: 410bc2e605e6b3152ba799967020b9a64516243a

let him take control of bitcoin..lol.he is one of the shit person in crypto era.No one believe him.he always try to make panic but he failed.he said that bitcoin will be destroy asked him about this.Only take his word as meme's don't take his word seriously.  

1. Craig Wright didn't invent Bitcoin.
2. Craig Wright doesn't understand Bitcoin.
3. Craig Wright has had nothing to do with Bitcoin.

He is a pathalogical liar who dug an incredibly deep grave, he's realizing that he can't climb out anymore so he's just trying to over-bluff people.

That is true, he is looking like a homo trying to convince everyone that he is straight. I don't think we need to have him in the news all the time, but he has got a lot of money to influence the media and make them publish 'sponsored' articles about him where he can make them speak what he wants to present to us and not what is the real truth. These are mind games actually, so that everyone's focus remains shifted to him while he entertains us all the time and want us to think that he is Satoshi only.

his claim has not merit.

mainly craig has shown no chain of custody of the software from satoshi's 2009 source forge version to craigs 2017+ BSV

also the real satoshi was happy to pass the batton to gavin who set up the github inventory which that inventory, though passing hands over the years does have a chain of custody over what has been deemed the main one.

craig did not become the current custodian of the github repo that has been around since the satoshi-gavin transition in 2010

in short craig himself is not using a satoshi client. nor is he using a gavin client.
craig is the one using the 'photocopy' and the real bitcoin repo. is still in the custodian and janitorial hands of core

i do not like the current janitors of the main btc client. for many reasons. but legally craig is in the wrong.

also as for the database.
craig did not write the database. infact in 2013 the database tools changed (the 0.5mb hiccup) so core right now are not using the same database ordering system as the real satoshi did in 2009-2010.
but because there is a very public proof of chain of custody from satoshi to gavin then to core. core have it not craig


as for the data in the database. that is not copywritable as its public. so craig cant even claim he owns the data.

the very fact that craig is not even using the 2009 satoshi varient works against craig in many many many ways
and if craig just wants to pretend for instance that he owns the data because he can sign messages of certain transactions..
wel great id like to see some actual fresh signed messages for once to show how many bytes of data he has control over..
but funny thing is over the amount of active usage of bitcoin i hve had over the last 8 years. i could prove i have done more transactions than him and my control over a certain amount of bytes of the blockchain far far far far exceeds his

This man doesn't have any plan on stopping about his claim and I can believe it that He is impersonating the develpoer of Bitcoin till now. What does it make Mr. Wright pursue his nonsense till now? I mean what's wrong with him, He just never runs out of stupid things. This lawsuit will never be agreed until he proved and gives enough evidence for his claimed.

You say this is something bad. A man simply found his niche and makes money on it, although I can’t even imagine who can believe him after so many of his speeches. Absolutely everything failed, absolutely everything, but some still believe in his speech, madness.

People like Craig Wright totally make the crypto procedure more problematic for the newbies but the good part is that his plan fail though because he was trying to scam and brainwashed the whole crypto sphere.
With that been said, people like Craig wont have a peaceful place life because lying is one of the things he believe in cause this is not the first time he lied about inventing something he didn't. Mind you, he does it in the gambling sphere.

After he failed at the court, he wants start another goose chase that will draw more problem to him. This man only ride on propaganda I thought all these was over. Wright  the drama king.

I am glad that there are at least a few issues out there of which we are all in agreement upon.

One thing that we also have to admit is Craig is a masterful liar for being able to keep the ruse going this long. Of course, for many of us, the ruse was over by 2016, yet the fact that it remains an economically viable one is a testament to Craig's ability to tell a compelling tall tale.

I just got done reading his entire blog post and it seems like he wants to redefine Bitcoin to give him complete control over its every aspect, which is of course, the antithesis of what Bitcoin was originally about. For example, from Craig's blog (https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/forking-and-passing-off/):


From Satoshi's introductory post on the P2P Foundation forum (http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source):


In addition to the stupid database ownership claims, he also attempts to:

- redefine the definition of nodes as meaning only miners
- claim that all 21 million bitcoin had been minted they were mined
- redefine the role of a miner as being a contractor under his employment (more or less)
- claim that all forks need his permission in order to operate

Of course this is all bullshit. Not only that, but it rests on the idea that he is Satoshi. Since he's clearly not Satoshi, his entire blog post is a moot point.

Nah. For a man that wanted so bad his name to be writing in the Guinness book of record as the notorious liar that's definitely not a very stupid behavior if you ask me.
 :D


I dont agree with you cause some silly people still believe him and i believe you will agree with me on that if you check their ANN thread on here.

The only interesting thing about this nonsense is that Craig Wright is officially against his own altcoin-Bitcoin Cash(BCH).I guess Craig lost control over his altcoin via last year's BCH forks,and now he wants to make some money via lawsuits.The funniest thing about this is that he "warns Bitcoin and bitcoin cash".How the hell can you threaten the users and developers of those cryptocurrencies to stop using them?The amount of active users and developers is what makes a cryptocurrency valuable.Without the people,the value of BTC and even BCH would be zero.

Thats correct but what still flabbergasted me despite all what have been said about Craig Wright so the whole crypto community would be aware of his intentions, some people who claimed to be crypto enthusiast still choose to invest in his coin (BSV) because of the small fraction of profit that wont last them a year.

Absolutely a drama king, knowing fully well that, Bitcoin has not one that control it and nobody is responsible for it ownership, how can you then file a law suit against what nobody controls. Let him prove himself and quietly sign message from Satoshi earliest wallets and take over Bitcoin. Am on the opinion that, he shouldn't be taken serious because he's an impersonator.

I just imagine the collective worldwide laugh from this. So sue us, good luck with that...

Indeed he has already failed to demonstrate in court his claim of being Satoshi, and the real Satoshi would never be this stupid or mean to threaten others to use his code.

I hope this Wright fool is ordered to shut up and/or pay compensation for making the courts lose time they could be using on REAL cases.

he doesn't understand the technicality of bitcoin, how it works and things like that. but he understand the power and value that bitcoin has which is the only reason he is trying too hard to stick himself to it and feed like a parasite.

He will never stop claiming as the real creator of bitcoin and I’m so tired about this one. Craig Wright is a mess guy, if he failed in the court then that’s a good reason for him to stop telling people about his authenticity. Creating bitcoin is indeed a good idea, but claiming it even if you know to yourself that you never create bitcoin is not.

I mentioned "starting a lawsuit" based on another article I read from CoinTelegraph (https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-threatens-btc-core-and-bch-with-potential-lawsuits).

I wish they would agree to that. I think we've heard more of his name than we've heard of Satoshi.

Seriously this guy should give us a break about all his rants of being the creator of bitcoin. We have had enough of it and they are pointless since he has not been able to prove true ownership of Bitcoin. So I am asking myself how is he going to suit BSV and BTC when he is not the rightful owner. I think it's high time we ignored Craig and all his baseless arguments.

This seems to be the most likely outcome, he keeps claiming that he is satoshi without presenting any proof and he is facing a case which I doubt he will win, it seems to me that he is realizing that time is up and he will not be able to maintain the lie any longer and he is doing everything he can to remain relevant, most likely he is trying to save his coin from crashing all the way to zero but that seems less and less likely with each passing day.

I don't get why he's suing Bitcoin then if he claims to be the creator? Lmao, I just wait for him to finally be put down, cause the only real fact about him is that he actually lied to the court.

Ahh yes, even I wouldn’t step on his way, especially if that way involves him making a deeper hole for his grave and for the consequences of his action. Perhaps it’s safe to say that I fully pledge my support to CSW on this one as it is obvious that this will turn out really bad real quick. Not to mention that the Australian government is still up in his ass to this day which makes it even more fun and exciting to see the man fail.

Anyone can release such a statement and try to ‘engage in a process’ of licensing, but can only do so for a couple of steps before further verification comes in the way. It’s obviously a diversion of attention for people to not remember that he hasn’t provided a solid proof that he owns tons of bitcoins with the addresses he mentioned were his.

then prove first to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto before claiming everything because until the time comes he will always be the Clown that we will all laugh with.
he had been making too much noise yet nothing that he proves so he only makes things worst from his part to make this statements that can used against Him.and he already facing charges for this claims and still Barking like a Dog in Social media.

Craig Wright keeps on manipulating people and even the situation but he don't realize that people will find a way to reveal his foolishness. What can you expect on a deceiver? I don't understand the reason behind why people are still trusting someone who claim himself as the person behind the pseudonym "Satoshi" when he is not even capable on proving it on people who doubted him. Craig Wright isn't tired being on the same issue because he knows that there are still few people who trust and believe his words that full of sweet lies. At the end of the day, he will just end up suffering the consequences of his actions.

Sorry but that's a load of rubbish. Satoshi would never license this.

He's not satoshi because he never signed a message from a bitcoin wallet which would be the first thing that the real satoshi would do. And the real Satoshi wouldn't be hoarding bitcoin data to himself he would give it to people in a decentralized manner. This guy sounds like he's trying to centralize bitcoin under him all by himself, and wasting his time trying to do the same for bitcoin cash, a niche coin which will be only as beneficial as centralizing some PoS coin.

marked already mate  ;D

Actually Criag is already a rich person that is why i see no reason for Him to make this statements and put Himself in funny position.

while most of us knew he was lying but it seems that he will never realized this instead he will continue Making this claim,but maybe until the court ordered him to stop then everything in crypto will comes back to normal again?but the more he creates story is the more publicity comes right?

well, I think his statement as a Satoshi is always rejected. however, some people think that this is a joke, and there are many things that he cannot prove that he is the founder of bitcoin. why does he talk so much about bitcoin?
moreover, if he insists that he is satoshi, he only needs to activate the "Satoshi" account that is on this forum and make a thread that he is Craig Wright.
besides, most people believe that he doesn't understand and doesn't own bitcoin. if that's true, he is a bad inventor  :(

You know this guy keeps making fun of himself ;D. Bruh, how do you even take control over something that you can’t even prove ownership of? The only thing he owns is the bitcoin fork and nothing else. And moreover if he’s truly the real Satoshi Nakamoto, he should at least have the team behind bitcoin supporting him and they should know that he is.

So, before he talks about taking control over bitcoin he should first of all give us proof that he’s the real Satoshi Nakamoto by login into his wallet and also providing other proofs that will make it seem legit. You just don’t come out and say that you’re the real Satoshi and expect everyone to simply believe that.

If it’s going to be like that, then he should know that he’s not the first person that has claimed to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, there are others that have done so before him and we should have believed the first person. He better focus on his own bitcoin fork and stop messing around.

Is it just me or anyone here who finds Craig Wright being crooked?

The way he claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto is not genuine. It is really easy to see the difference between truth and lies. And Craig is clearly a poor con-artist. He's not a good liar though, I guess he needs to stop.

Maybe he just wanted to be relevant again since the people are getting tired of his. I never see myself becoming someone like this guy. His will is too much for my stomach, really sorry for the words.

Well, concerning this lawsuit to Bitcoin, who is Bitcoin? Who will physically bear or take the responsibility of this lawsuit by Craig W. This amazes me a lot for seeing some one who had respect before and turned to be a crooked in the process. You did hardfork among others and still complained about the said Bitcoin, Haba! Craig, can't you allow Bitcoin to rest?, move on with other projects please.

Hahaha   :D can you all stop creating topic at any cost about this man? From the very start this guy is making noise to bitcoin whatabouts and claims to be the creator of it, the other side, he even said bitcoin's a trash bubble so what's the point of talking about this guy although he is rich and well known personality in business field. I read nothing positive with Craig vs Bitcoin, it's always like this lol. Not only that he is crooked, he is a confirmed dubious.

As I see Craig with his talking tells about what's inside his head, a narrow mind which I conclude does not fall to any possible characteristics of a computer person so why would some people believe that he is the creator? Does he look like he did create it? rofl.
He doesn't behave like he does!

I wonder why the authorities are so lenient towards him since it seems they are being played by him, are they trying to use him to try to make bitcoin seem less legitimate and that is why they allow such nonsense to keep going? Because I cannot explain otherwise why they let him do as he wishes, but in any case it seems that he is slowly driving himself into a corner of which it will be impossible to escape and when that happens I will love to see BSV crashing taking away all of those people claiming BSV is the real bitcoin.

All this rant makes no meaning to me. Saying something like this is enough reason not to believe this folk. If he is the real satoshi I bet there are many things he must change without even making any public post like this. I know people can go extra miles just to stay relevant but this man is overdoing everything and perhaps he is going to be jailed one day because of his fibble stories. If you are satoshi, you do not need to tell us, of course, people will know you are the real satoshi

We know that already , he is an insane person this was something that he was supposed to do , it was already expected from him , he should be glad that he is not behind the bars because the government is already very frustrated at him for going on and on about things that he doesn't know anything about , He is a thief .
He was respectable once I have no idea why he is trying to kill that respect himself .

Craig Wright announced a possible lawsuit over ownership of Bitcoin, most likely to be talked about all over the world. However, he is bluffing, because he must understand that if in the near future he does not prove in court that Satoshi Nakamoto is, then all his threats are absolutely useless. And I think that he fully understands the futility of the lawsuit he has begun, and, therefore, his statement of claim is no more than a farce.

Claims to own a database, still can't provide any proof of Bitcoin's creation ...


Again, it's simply a case of "Put up or shut up"!

I just don’t understand this, it’s starting to get funny lol. How is it possible that he’s planning a potential lawsuit against the Bitcoin team when he can’t even prove that he’s the real Satoshi Nakamoto? He’s just joking and the truth is that he’s never going to do anything.

Even if he tries it, he won’t have anything to prove whatever allegations he will have. Before accusing them he will have to first prove that he’s Satoshi and that Bitcoin is his work, after then he will be able to file a lawsuit against Bitcoin team. For now he can’t do anything, and if he does try, he will just be wasting his money for nothing.

He didnt lawsuit the whole bitcoin team in the first place and i believe he started with Peter McCormack while the whole bitcoin team, exchange site CEOs, crypto community supported Mc Cormack when people find out that he's just a con expect with a controversial history.
But, what i dont understand is his genuine purpose and i dont think people like him waste their money for nothing mate.

This is just another joke coming from CSW and for sure people are surely laughing as his recent dumb move to sue Bitcoin, lmao. And I don't think that crypto enthusiast are taking him seriously sometimes you really don't understand why going on CSW's mind.

Let him do the things he thinks he is right, that's why a pathological liar is, can't really accepted defeat and will create another story to suit their narratives.

He can't even prove that he is the real Satoshi. Even if he needs to make a lawsuit against Bitcoin and Bitcoincash, he has to start with himself because he is the creator of Bitcoin. after all made a difficult bitcoin fork, and now he has made a difficult fork from a hard fork and claims to be real bitcoin. Long blog posts like that but what bothers me is why he even filed a lawsuit about bitcoin when he couldn't even prove himself to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto? He was just wasting his time and effort because obviously, he would not win the lawsuit because he didn't even have ownership of Bitcoin. however, some people think that this is a joke, and there are many things that he cannot prove that he is the founder of bitcoin.
moreover, if he insists that he is satoshi, he only needs to activate the "Satoshi" account on this forum and make a thread that he is Craig Wright.

Craig should be careful on this statements and actions, it can be used against him later on. Why can't he just moved on with this issue insisting he can control bitcoin and that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Okay, the guts he build on his self and the confidence is still at him but that jusy making him look so stupid. Everyone knows he is just one of those attention seeker.

If he can't even make one of his statements true, how can people believe his crap?

To stay relevant I guess. He's been doing this for years now and to think that he would come this far just to shill his scam coin. You see, he isn't doing this to make people believe that he is Satoshi, the creator of Bitcoin, he is doing this to lure more newbies and spread false lies in order for them to invest in BSV instead of Bitcoin and this cunt is doing a great job by making another statement. Check the market price of BSV and you'll see a pump and dump-like pattern.

I just can't wait for when he is exposed for his lies.

The catch with this is IF he could do this like 4 levels down into dubious connections with legalities and the law, with his fake patents and such using the courts to compel miners to do as he

says...then IMHO, all crypto of any kind is dead, any developer of any crypto (founder) could get lawyers and find a loophole and essentially 'blackmail' the crypto

project whatever it was into doing the founder of the crypto's bidding. Anyway, he has multiple jurisdictions in the world to play these games..he did

a lawsuit for a guy that I think is still in play in the U.K. assuming he could use the libel laws of the U.K. and his money to bury the guy, folks flocked to his defense and he had money to fight it

and indeed it may have already been tossed out of court in the U.K. because the guy can adequately defend himself now in court.

Craig Wright also using dubious patents in many dubious countries is also using Australian law to not comply with a current case in a U.S. Court. There are likely a dozen examples.

Anyway, I'm not hopeful, Donald Trump got 191 million or some such from his inheritance and essentially has had 9 bankruptcies...so if you have enough cash and

its a worldwide thing like BTC, I'm sure Craig Wright can continue to make fake cases in dubious court systems around the world to hype his 'fake satoshi' scam for years to come.

Sad Indeed!

Brad

then we will be happy if does mate,because this person needs nothing but Lies and he will never stop until he Get His claim or be Put Behind Bars for complete silence.
this clown will give us benefits also because upon His shouting Bitcoin becomes more popular outside the forum and gaining international media to look into this case.
so the thing is the more he Bark is the more we being advertised .

People who claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto are not just Craig Wright, but this figure is one of the best known. Advertisement The name Craig Wright is widely known after identifying himself as the main part of the team that created Bitcoin, and claims that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. People who claim to be Nakamoto are not only Wright, but this figure is the most vocal in voicing his claims, and the hobby creates controversy from time to time. After graduating from high school in 1987, Wright completed 18 SANS Institute programs and was the first person in the world to receive a GIAC certification, which is a certification in cyber security. Craig Wright's Relationship with Bitcoin In December 2015, two parallel investigations carried out by Wired and Gizmodo revealed the possibility of Craig Wright as the inventor of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. Jon Matonis who is the founder of the Bitcoin Foundation states that, "For cryptographic evidence, Craig signs and verifies the message using the private key from the block # 1 and block # 9 the newly generated coin (the first transaction for Hal Finney).

Well, there are a couple of reasons he is doing this as either he is digging his own grave or else he needs more attention or it's an attempt to see if the real Satoshi Nakamoto comes out in public. Not sure how someone can be so foolish and I am sure he will fall in his own trap and this drama will not be entertained by the court.

Making yourself look dumb into the public just to make the real satoshi comes out? I dont see for this reasoning to be that valid.
Actually im already done to this troll into all thins that hes trying to make from claiming to be satoshi with corresponding
failed attempts and even up to these times he do still try hard to mess up the bitcoin community with those BS claims which
cant really be totally proved out.

I hope he will stop doing these stunts and just live a peaceful life. what does he really want? fame? money? i guess he has already all the money that he needs until retirement. fame? but he is getting popular because of negative publicity. does he really like to be known as one of the hated persons in crypto? and by the way, just to have an idea of how much he is worth but we don't know the truth about such claims.

https://wethecryptos.net/craig-s-wright-net-worth-is-alleged-faketoshi-as-rich-as-he-claims/

Wrong

He just manages to keep the muggles out of doing shit this time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ys4gxyw82w&feature=youtu.be

Satoshi is much more intelligent than we ever might ve noticed

 ;D

Your confusion comes from the belief that he isn't broke.  He likely is, except for the funding he's slowly extracting from his victims-- which is why you see him making so may posts faking wealth (e.g. claims to have a lambo, but people googled the tags and found it was a one day rental, same with the boat and the plane, and his 'supercomputer' didn't even exist at all).  The page you're linking to makes its analysis assuming that he's Satoshi lol (eyeroll).

When he stops scamming the money will dry up and if that's all that happens its a best case scenario. More likely, all the people that he's ripped off with promises of access to Satoshi's coins will come after him and he'll end up in jail.  He might even be murdered --- I get the impression that some of the people he's scammed are the sort that you don't scam and live to tell the tale.  Plenty of reason to keep the lies coming even without speculating about the possibility of serious mental illness.

You are talking about the part at 2:06:00 ff, right?
This meta level theory makes absolutely no sense. Craig Wright is not the creator of the Bitcoin white paper and the Tulip Trust is a fake. He has no access to Satoshis coins and his GPG key and he is a scammer.

hm - good you know all that. So you must be Satoshi then - at least hidden here.

Right now, I ve not seen anyone claiming better in the real world, so go for

I don't see ADG claiming to be Satoshi, just because he is pointing out that Craig Wright is an outright fraud.

I see he's fighting agains ano & anarcho, against crime and ML

Sure - some wanna call that 'fraud'

Just go real - public - and see  the light ?

Faketoshi is a fraud.  Ayre is knowingly complicit in the fraud.  They are the architects and the ones who stand to profit from said fraud.  You and anyone else foolish enough to read and subsequently repeat the words of Faketoshi and Ayre are unwitting accomplices in their fraud.  They rely on you to perpetuate the lies for them.  They are using you.  You will suffer financially for buying into their scam.  Your reputation will suffer for being associated with their scam.  There is literally no benefit for you in promoting their fraud.  Only consequences.

Seriously reconsider what it is you are choosing to advocate.

For sure: Not punky segwit-coin or anarcho bch

Have fun with nichy non-compliant hobby experiments

After going through this thread I’m still wondering the possibilities of Craig Wright filing a lawsuit against Bitcoin.
Before he talks about filing a lawsuit against Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, he should first of all talk about proving his claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

People don’t believe that he’s Satoshi because he couldn’t prove, how then does he take such action against BTC and BCH when he is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto? The only person that has the right to take such actions is the real founder of Bitcoin and not just some random guy that’s seeking clout.

As far as I'm aware, the possibility is *zero* because there is no individual or company to file a lawsuit against.  Ask a legal professional if you can file a lawsuit against TCP/IP or HTTP.  I'm pretty sure they'll tell you that's not possible (unless they're just looking to bill you for the time it takes them to find out for certain that it's not possible). 

Protocols are just bits of code that people agree on and use to build networks together.  I don't see how you would initiate legal proceedings against them.



Nope.  Irrelevant.  Even if the real slim shady satoshi nakamoto stood up and said they were taking Bitcoin to court, the answer would be the same as above.

Stop paying attention to the pantomime sideshow of who satoshi may or may not be.  It's just a distraction from the facts, which is that Bitcoin is an open-source protocol and you can't sue it because it's just code that people on the internet are running.  It can't be shut down without killing the internet.  No one can issue a court order and say the network now belongs to whoever was trying to litigate against it, because that's simply unenforceable.   

Ehh.

Okay, so first off-- you're absolutely right on one point: Even the real Satoshi wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on. But not because there is no one to sue... but because there is nothing valid to sue over.

But not having a legal leg to stand on doesn't matter that much if you have a supply of money to keep litigating.  You can sue anyone at any time for essentially any reason. Your lawsuit, if frivolous, will eventually fail but not after costing the victim a lot of time and money.

Wright has already filed a pile of frivolous lawsuits, -- he keeps losing them but they still cost their targets money.

Wright could sue anyone, he could sue you.   If he was effective he'd manage to use the publicity of doing so to bring more victims into his fold and make more money out of it than the cost of the lawsuit,  but presumably even if he's not effective he could keep it up for a while on the largess of his existing victims.

Now, none of this would stop Bitcoin itself.  ... But on the other hand, if he kept suing anyone that does anything important for Bitcoin and as a result scared off people it could still have a negative effect.   Unfortunately, the legal systems in the developed world seem ill prepared to handle a lot of the fraud in the cryptocurrency ecosystem and Wright is a great example of that.

Wright's frivolous litigation probably won't stop anyone that has a healthy business-- if you're making money you can afford to swat the wright-fly as a cost of doing business.  But enthusiasts that participate because they love Bitcoins social or technological implications? Journalists that have razor thin margins?  Some of them-- perhaps many-- will find other things to do rather than be targeted.

I've already heard from a number of people, including fairly high profile journalists, that they're avoiding saying anything about wright (or, even, avoiding retracting stuff they previously published which they now know to be false) because they're concerned about frivolous litigation by wright.

And that is, of course, exactly what he wants. It's expensive for him to sue people,  so much better if he can spend a few minutes throwing around a bunch of baseless threats and then a large number of people well self censor.

Has anyone filed a lawsuit against Craig? After all, he deceives people .

I recommend cz  stand up ;)

I also wonder why no one has called him to account for all his words that he said, and many of which in one way or another harmed Bitcoin. Although I do not exclude the option that most of him simply do not perceive him as a serious person, whose words could be trusted.

It's a job for the state to prosecute criminals and lock them up for the laws they have broken.  That alone should be sufficient.  Perjury and fraud both seem likely charges at some point.  Wouldn't surprise me at all if there were others too.

There a pretty famous lawsuit going on against him right now: he is being sued by the brother of his former business partner. We've been discussing it pretty extensively in the Bitcoin SV Scam Accusation thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52303012#msg52303012). There's a decent 4 part blog series about it that starts here (https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html).