Craig Wright Potential Lawsuit to Bitcoin

[Asuspawer09]

Craig Wright the man who claims to be the creator of bitcoin (Satoshi Nakamoto) warned bitcoin and bitcoin cash to stop using the bitcoin database so that they could avoid a potential lawsuit!

Wright claims the bitcoin and bitcoin cash is violating the law under Bitcoin’s original EULA and MIT License.

He said in his personal blog posts that he is going to take back the control of bitcoin.
Read info Here :
https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/forking-and-passing-off/




“As the creator of Bitcoin, I maintain the sui generis rights to any copy of the database created from Genesis in January 2009. I shall not be relinquishing the ownership. I will be licensing it, and have already engaged in a process.” -Craig Wright


Reference:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-threatens-btc-core-and-bch-with-potential-lawsuits

[Debonaire217]

If and only if he stick to his real creation which are the bitcoin forks, I think Craig Wright should have a more peaceful life as of now. His will to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto makes him more fraudulent to the eyes of those who didn't believe in him and it just makes the market complicated for newbies to be exposed to someone like him.

Craig Wright couldn't even prove his ownership of the private key and address of the genesis block which is quite the most simplest way to prove that he's the real Satoshi.

If he keeps on making too much drama, I hope he end up having his hard work for his forks to be in waste.

[rosezionjohn]

He is just making another noice to stay relevant. Instead of threatening bitcoin and its other fellow fork coin, he should just worry about his own ongoing case. He can't even prove that he is the real Satoshi. I would rather ignore whatever he says. Besides, how many times does he have to make a threat? I'm guessing even roger ver is laughing right now with craig's latest.

[hatshepsut93]

Good old patent trolling and attention whoring - just what you'd expect from this slimeball known as Craig Wright. There's absolutely zero chance that anyone will recognize his "rights", he's doing it purely to get attention and scare the noobs who easily believe everything what they read on their news. Imo CWS should be at least fined if not thrown to jail for wasting governments time and resources on his court battles, patent claims and just committing identity theft, as well as manipulating the market of his pet shitcoin bsv.

[Tipstar]

This person is digging his grave larger. He has misled the court and the court is about to take actions against him. And this would be a testimony for any further lawsuits that Craig Wright is a mentally unstable liar. Though if he needed to make a lawsuit against Bitcoin and Bitcoincash, he should start with himself as he is the creator of Bitcoin.

[Ozero]

This is a very stupid move on the part of Craig Wright. Not only can he prove in court that Satoshi Nakamoto is, but recent events in court practically refute this. The judge gave him the opportunity until the first of February to provide evidence of the management of Nakamoto's wallets. His lawyer said Craig Wright could not do this. After that, such a statement of his looks very strange. He sets up the public against himself. Very stupid of him.

[bL4nkcode]

This man... after ver made a hard fork of bitcoin, and now that he already made a hard fork from a hard fork and claiming it as the real bitcoin. After the whitepaper, and now... come on.

[bitmover]

What is crazier about this is that he "warned bitcoin"

How does someone "warn" bitcoin? Did he tried some email like ceo@bitcoin.com to contact? lol

This is wjhat is amazing about bitcoin. Nobody is in charge, there is no one to warn, there is on one to process or to make a lawsuit against.

[BrewMaster]

as far as i know when something is released under MIT license it means anybody is free to copy the code without needing any kind of permissions whatsoever.
in other words this is just another bullshit out of a big scammer who has been getting forgotten by the media so he made some noise again to remain in it!

[20kevin20]

Funny when someone who has provided forged documents in court and created a coin with a plagiarized whitepaper calls out someone for stealing "his work" which he never proved is his.

Start a lawsuit trying to prove something about what you can't even prove you own. This is just stupid AF. I'm still waiting for that first picture of him in the jail cell. This boy is apparently too addicted to lying.

[AGD]

Imagine Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, minted a million Bitcoins, disappeared to 'move on to other projects', lost all of his private keys, lost his GPG key, lost access to any known email address and now comes back to sue 'Bitcoin' and all of its forks. If this was real, Satoshi is a lonely mother fraggin idiot! Hmmmmm, I guess it's not real and Craig Wright is a lonely mother fraggin idiot. 

[BrewMaster]

Start a lawsuit trying to prove something about what you can't even prove you own. This is just stupid AF. I'm still waiting for that first picture of him in the jail cell. This boy is apparently too addicted to lying.

you gotta read between the lines, there will never be a lawsuit. he is just an attention whore who needs to pull something like this every now and then or he is going to be forgotten as the idiot who tried to scam people and was laughed at.
but this way, we keep talking about him every damn day! imagine if news sites agreed not to mention him ever in any of their articles. then it would be as if he doesn't even exist.

[plvbob0070]

Such a long blog post by him but what bothers me is why would he even file a lawsuit regarding bitcoin when he can't even prove himself as the real Satoshi Nakamoto? He's just wasting his time and efforts because obviously, he won't win that lawsuit because he doesn't even have ownership of Bitcoin. He can't even give enough proof on the court. That's nonsense.

"As the sole creator of Bitcoin, I own full rights to the Bitcoin registry."
The audacity to claim himself as Satoshi. Since when did he have the right to own the creation of Bitcoin? I wasn't informed.

[Oceat]

What a troll attention seeker trying hard to earn something that he didn't even made.
This nonsense is getting deeper and deeper just like making his own grave.
I can only see why he's so desperate to own Bitcoin maybe because he wants Satoshi to come out. lol
Just a little longer and we will finally gonna see him behind bars, just let him do whatever he wants to do right now. 

[pixie85]

Imagine Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, minted a million Bitcoins, disappeared to 'move on to other projects', lost all of his private keys, lost his GPG key, lost access to any known email address and now comes back to sue 'Bitcoin' and all of its forks. If this was real, Satoshi is a lonely mother fraggin idiot! Hmmmmm, I guess it's not real and Craig Wright is a lonely mother fraggin idiot. 

How can he even warn bitcoin to stop doing something. Bitcoin is not a person nor a company.

Next headline: Craig Wright sends a warning to the Internet to stop laughing at him and warns blockchain that it should stop processing Bitcoin transactions or he will sue.

Maybe suing isn't the best choice since Craig usually loses in court

[DaCryptoRaccoon]

// Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
// SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
// OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
// FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
// IN THE SOFTWARE.


The guy is a absolute fraud and I hope the community will rally against his fraudulent claims to the rights of bitcoin the above notice is the statement included in the November 16, 2008 release by the REAL Satoshi Nakamoto..

Craig has NO right's to ANY database used in bitcoin or any of the software.
Craig is a fraud and has NO access to the Satoshi PGP key
Craig HAS Lied to 1000's of people including US Courts.
Craig IS NOT SATOSHI....

Date : November 16, 2008
MD5: 6884e5046285913c1a93ae071bcc763a
SHA1: 410bc2e605e6b3152ba799967020b9a64516243a

[rajsimran]

let him take control of bitcoin..lol.he is one of the shit person in crypto era.No one believe him.he always try to make panic but he failed.he said that bitcoin will be destroy asked him about this.Only take his word as meme's don't take his word seriously.  

[TheNewAnon135246]

1. Craig Wright didn't invent Bitcoin.
2. Craig Wright doesn't understand Bitcoin.
3. Craig Wright has had nothing to do with Bitcoin.

He is a pathalogical liar who dug an incredibly deep grave, he's realizing that he can't climb out anymore so he's just trying to over-bluff people.

[2double0]

you gotta read between the lines, there will never be a lawsuit. he is just an attention whore who needs to pull something like this every now and then or he is going to be forgotten as the idiot who tried to scam people and was laughed at.
but this way, we keep talking about him every damn day! imagine if news sites agreed not to mention him ever in any of their articles. then it would be as if he doesn't even exist.

That is true, he is looking like a homo trying to convince everyone that he is straight. I don't think we need to have him in the news all the time, but he has got a lot of money to influence the media and make them publish 'sponsored' articles about him where he can make them speak what he wants to present to us and not what is the real truth. These are mind games actually, so that everyone's focus remains shifted to him while he entertains us all the time and want us to think that he is Satoshi only.

[franky1]

his claim has not merit.

mainly craig has shown no chain of custody of the software from satoshi's 2009 source forge version to craigs 2017+ BSV

also the real satoshi was happy to pass the batton to gavin who set up the github inventory which that inventory, though passing hands over the years does have a chain of custody over what has been deemed the main one.

craig did not become the current custodian of the github repo that has been around since the satoshi-gavin transition in 2010

in short craig himself is not using a satoshi client. nor is he using a gavin client.
craig is the one using the 'photocopy' and the real bitcoin repo. is still in the custodian and janitorial hands of core

i do not like the current janitors of the main btc client. for many reasons. but legally craig is in the wrong.

also as for the database.
craig did not write the database. infact in 2013 the database tools changed (the 0.5mb hiccup) so core right now are not using the same database ordering system as the real satoshi did in 2009-2010.
but because there is a very public proof of chain of custody from satoshi to gavin then to core. core have it not craig


as for the data in the database. that is not copywritable as its public. so craig cant even claim he owns the data.

the very fact that craig is not even using the 2009 satoshi varient works against craig in many many many ways
and if craig just wants to pretend for instance that he owns the data because he can sign messages of certain transactions..
wel great id like to see some actual fresh signed messages for once to show how many bytes of data he has control over..
but funny thing is over the amount of active usage of bitcoin i hve had over the last 8 years. i could prove i have done more transactions than him and my control over a certain amount of bytes of the blockchain far far far far exceeds his