Bitcoin Forum

Can chipmixer comment why they are sponsoring many of the forums dangerous members?
When their sponsored members are abusing other members and cheating with red trust to break their accounts.
This actions are incredibly dangerous for everyone and spoils the trust system 
They are sponsoring several untrustworthy members and not giving fair opportunity.
I see some chipmixer signatures are placed with the member that have a red tag now?
Malboroza have a red tag? Why are only some nationalities  not permitted if they have a red tag?
This is a double standard. Who make rules that only applies for some nationalities?

It can be noticed that chipmixer sponsoring many members that do not use red rags to warm for scammers or anything like this.
These members are using the red tag to prevent free speech or even to reveal some evidence from their own history. They also apply red rag to prevent members being eligible for sig campaigns like chip mixer because not a red tag member can join?

Why only some members can join and have red tag themselves?
Chipmixer is doing this action or they do not know this cheating and racism is here?
Many of the forum members voted as untrustworthy are chipmixer sponsored.
What will chipmixer owner say? They will treat all nationalities  equal or are there race  bias?

The owner will say, the manager is in charge of who get's in or who doesn't. Red trust is reviewed on a case by case basis and is up to the managers judgement. I'm not 100% sure who all is in chipmixer campaign, but i disagree that all in the campaign are bad or racist.

Those who are in are users whom have some respect on the forum and users that when they post, people usually read what they say. That means people will also see the advertisement in most cases.

Stop worrying about you or your friends not being able to get into a campaign, and figure out why you cannot get in. Crying about it will not get you in.

I don’t think you will get a response out of Chipmixer.

I don’t agree with darkstar deferring blindly to the trust system, it would be far superior to evaluate each situations underlying circumstances. Ex Bill Gator

If you have a specific concern about a particular person getting paid by Chipmixer, you should go to darkstar and if he doesn’t give you a satisfactory answer, you can escalate to Chipmixer.

I am sure that DS would like a member from Turkey but I think many people out of that local sub are trying too hard and there is a lot of what amounts to corruption there.

The owner must prevent a poor and racist selection. Rules can be for every member not change this rules for malboroza.
This owner should care if he will be sponsor the trust abuse and those member votes untrustworthy if the evidence is there.
There are many chipmixer members that are not honest. They use red tag to force silence and hide their past  
The owner must understand his damage for chipmixer reputation.
The effort must be the same, not bias and corrupt selection.
The owner must be aware. Not any race I want to talk about. The pool of chipmixer is from one group it is clear favourites.
Even red tag they will stay sponsored. This is a cheat and proven red tag and lies excuse.
I want public investigation not hide for PM manager. He not honest anyone can see.

Keep bend fake rules. Racist and nepotism for close group of friends many dangerous and untrustworthy.
They will even try report ma y excellent post to defeat others entry to their closed group.
Delete every red tag member or chip mixer are cheat and liars. Then all their past lies are visible.

Someone brought this up as an issue not too long ago, and most of the opinions leaned toward there not being any sort of race bias in the Chipmixer campaign--and that was certainly my opinion.  And as I said in that other thread, it's really really hard to get into that campaign and I'm sure the list of rejected applicants represents quite a few nationalities. 

I haven't checked marlboroza's trust page recently, but I will after writing this.  If he got a neg from someone on DT, I suppose that's something DarkStar_ would have to make a call on--but it's really none of your concern, OP.  You're coming across as a disgruntled applicant who couldn't get into the Chipmixer campaign rather than someone pursuing some sort of justice. 

Also, if you're a crappy writer you're not going to get into the Chipmixer campaign.  I'm assuming that's why you got rejected if you did in fact apply to it.  So perhaps the problem lies in the mirror and not with DarkStar_, Chipmixer, or anybody on the forum.

Can't stop observing your good opinion around the isues  8) this guy couldn't stop crying at this forum because no one else, he was not accepted into chipmixer, he started crying because he felt it was unfair when he was not chosen, people tend to be kind when denied, he did not  :-\ A poor fellow sneaking up a new account to mess around, is there anything else?  If it doesn't feel right, come here to your main account and provide convincing evidence, don't cry here.
Edit: I have just checked the marlboroza’s trust page, without any reliable negative feedback
https://i.imgur.com/xu6r4w1.png

I'll spare your time:

https://i.imgur.com/mfDtxxx.png

Reference link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220060.msg53687151#msg53687151

He left me that feedback because I exposed some ban evaders and self-DT-voters (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg53348632#msg53348632)


what to say...

It is funny, actually, one of those accounts is allegedly jihadist https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219960.msg53689508#msg53689508 but I am pure evil because I pointed that he is evading ban...

Make exactly 0 sense, but OK, "lets just decentralize DT more".

I only want afair treatment in every member. I don't expect any position personally it is true I could not be honest selection in posting standard requirement. Chipmixer claim want the best then only  superior poster can join. That will be fair.

This member tells a false opinion, and she will say this because he on this chipmixer group.
I don't want to have a chip mixer but I see the cheat and racism ot nepotism and bias against some nationalities.
You can not be talking here thepharmacist, I seen about your past greed and cheat on another thread, Darkstar says want trustworthy members  but he does not. You are not the one for chipmixer if trust and best poster is really what he trying  to show.
You should vacate for honest trustworthy great poster.
Anyone wears the chip mixer is motivating to deny this points I making now.
Chipmixer lie, don't pick premier posting and trustworthy members. He just say whatever his friends can provide themselves with merit and give other ones who make a try to delete their posts and guides, find a false reason for a red tag, they can not be with chipmixer. If they get red tag they say don't worry mate you can have it, won't be problem for you  mate.
Don't change rules to help untrustworthy trustabuser and cheats.


Marlboroza have excuse and many have excuse stronger than your excuse. Darkstar don't care their excuse he can  not care about your excuse. Some people get red tag from you pool for saying opinion or truth you don't like.
Sorry no excuse you all say to them just exclude and don't worry about red tags. You can excluded and not worry but chipmixer no longer for malboraza campaign manager say not our job to investigate you get a red tag sorry mate

Chipmixer owners can stop this cheating racism and nepotism. They must do.

They don't have to. It's their money, their rules, their ways of following them. You just cannot argue with that.
If you comply and get lucky, perfect. If not, move on. That's what I've done. And many others too. There are more campaigns, there are more opportunities, and it's not all about money.. or should not be.

Now... if Chipmixer would also pay 25-50$ per week, would you care?  ::)

Chipmixer don't have to be fair. They can be nepotism and racist and cheats and liars. It is true they can but then I can and others can notice this and point it out. We can get red tag but this why my shield is here. A shield for a free speech is honorable as my words are true.

I would care because I don't think it help this forum is chipmixer sponsor dangerous and cheating members  
I can not try to get on chipmixer personally.
Make it fair and honest or you can admit you are unfair cheating and racist and want to sponsor members who can trust abuse and cause the forum dangerous high risk.

I think OP missed to read updated rules about negative feedback and flags. Here is your answer,

So it's pretty clear if your positive trust is greater than negative trust then most likely participants will not remove. Have you noticed someone like that? Please mention it if we are missing something.

On the other hand, you may write directly to owner or manager via PM if you found something wrong. Since marlboroza's positive feedback greater than negative trust so I don't think he will be removed. And there is question "how valid this negative trust"?

However, excluded (~Vispilio). Currently DT2 status "Vispilio (-1)", so I don't think counter feedback is necessary.

@OP, still are you seeing red trust on marlboroza's profile?

A red tag from a vindictive troll like Vispilio who thinks it's appropriate to use red trust and flags for "racism"? It means nothing. You should be more concerned why your compatriots are voting such users into DT1.

I think chipmixer owner should come .I will ask him why such a large proportion of chipmixer advertisers are sponsored that also trust abuse other members and why most are from  same pool of people that share merit and trust inclusions.
I will ask him to see the highest quality posters and most trustworthy members then show me.
I will ask him to see if he see the merit sharing, group inclusions and trust abuse and historical untrustworthy actions.  
The more red than green is just another cheat is not advisable. Red trust was for scam before flag. You can not have one scam and be one the most trustworthy one for chip mixer on forum.  If it not about scam at all then who can give a fuck it is invented and not about trustworthyness.
Chipmixer owner need to reflect and make sensible fair rule to protect chipmixer from being racist. Nepotism and group of abusers that are not superior posters.
10 red tags for say the truth they don't want and 1 red tag for steal or scam is not a basis for surface judgement.
Chipmixer is close group that control and bias the other members. If you not a mate you can not have a fair chance.
I can show untrustworthy or trust abuse and low quality  post in many of chipmixer cheaters.

Suchmoon chipmixer talk about exemplary members but votes on DT1 those trust abusers and scammers. I have seen the truth and history of them. Suchmoon support the most dangerous and worst cheaters here.
Chipmixer will corrupt the hearts of many like suchmoon. Bring your members chipmixer and suchnoon he votes for I can show chipmixer owner the truth of it.

Did you look into the mirror when you said this?
Did you get a good laugh?  ;D


You have to make your mind. You don't seem convinced your problem is about Chipmixer or ... one person.
The Chipmixer members I discuss with (on this forum) on a daily basis are way more than "OK".
And however you try to put some personal grudge under the blanket of "fight for the truth", it's just plain pathetic.

this a shameless and nasty lie, disproven time and again on many threads.

~suchmoon is the only one who has to bring "racism" bullshit every time into the debate in a childish pathetic attempt to discredit dissenting opinions on this forum.

In a real respectable business organization, a manipulative petty monster like her wouldn't be even asked to wait as a receptionist,

and yet here she is hailed as the sMerit and DT queen and the admin watches her inner circle take over forum dynamics for years in total silence.

Hence the forum has to endure a totally broken trust system run by nepotist criminals, until all the respectable campaigns wake up and completely give up on sponsoring these self-indulgent abusers who make their living milking BTT like an ATM for themselves and their many alt / sock puppet accounts ...

This is a sitting duck if you put in the research. You could easily demonstrate that chipmixer is certainly sponsoring a bunch of dangerous trust abusers and scammer suporters.

Check out this thread a lot of the homework is done. The links and post histories of many chipmixer spammers are very unsavory and corrupt. Full of greed,  scammer supporting and trust abuse.  

Only a constantly and continued effort will bring change.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0

then join the guild in meta. Objective transparent standards don't permit nepotism or racism. Once those are installed then you don't need to fight this bias you have noted may exist.

Come and join The objective standards guild. Only if you wish for fair and equal treatment of all members.

Your opinion is irrelevant I will introduce evidence that show you are talk rubbish and have a very low standards then you say they are more than okay, tell me which member more than okay I will then need to visit your sponsor if you say scammers and trust abuser is more than okay. Let me see these more that okay  very trustworthy best posting members

It is like on-off button. I had DT -ve then I didn't then I have it again.

Oh don't be shy now.

---

Couldn't agree more. Feel free to exclude suchmoon for any reason you see fit.


Yeah... no. The title of this thread is "Chipmixer sponsor dangerous untrustworthy members and Racists and unfair treat?" so I'm not the one who's bringing it up.


I thought I was a nanny. You're getting lost in your misogynist tripe.

It say marboroza -1 and say red tag? Nobody see this one?

Marlboroza also including scammer and trust abusers on his trust list.
Post quality is okay, but I will say negative as he supporting scamming mate lauda tman and other undesirable  membersand try to prevent fair and equality for all members. Chipmixer owner should investigate deep for his contamination.

Chilmixer should make a strong effort to not be a sponsor of any member that is dangerous by destroying the trust system,  not have any scamming or cheating for money  and make excellent value posts.
Pick the truly best members or if you pick dangerous cheats and poor poster you can explain why you are sponsoring damage to bitcointalk

Dark star make hoop for some poster  but let small value poster like pharmacist and cheater spammers racist troll, and scammer supporter like him be on chipmixer.  Oh really mate. Say not racist read HugeBlackWoman account posts, this proven as the pharmacist  alt account.

If I go as dt I see the -1 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736;dt
If I go by my normal settings, I don't see the -1 because Vispilio is excluded, although not directly (he's not in my distrust list).

So OP may indeed see the -1.

When Coolcryptovator excluded Vispilio, the orange "-1" on marlboroza's profile was briefly gone, but then imhoneer included peloso who includes Vispilio so he's back in DT and the
"-1" is showing again (with DT settings).

I had to un-ignore OP...
Nonsense. Dude, you sound like this:

https://youtu.be/cmlq40G9xK8?t=20

And Vispilio with his rants sound like this:

https://youtu.be/cmlq40G9xK8?t=99

Simple solution: Do not employ anyone from the Turkish section until they as a group mature up. Problem solved. IIRC this is the most problematic section I have dealt with in all my history here (and Asian shitposters I have dealt with in countless number - which says a lot).

Now that does sound racist. I don't think you should be trying to influence them to endure your double standards and scamming by threatening to crush their chances to earn from the forum like you and your toadies.

If they are presenting you with a problem they likely must have more courage and moral fiber than most other members. The forum needs strong opposition to scammers and extortionists like you.

Nope. You can scream and shout racism, but that will lead you to nowhere. They have created a problem themselves, and I am offering a simple solution to it. That is it.  :)

Is it inspired by the final solution?
No, they have made it clear they will not put up with your gaming the system for your own personal gain. You are suggesting they do as you think they should, else you will try to extort or blackmail them by cutting rev streams based on race that will have negative impact on their entire board.

I think any campaign manager operating according to your suggestion will be swiftly removed or their project will be open to serious and sustained crticism.

Chipmixer clearly does sponsor a colluding group that cycle merits and self install themselves on DT. Sadly many are scammer supporters or shit posters. I'm not sure there is a clear racist theme but rather any group or individual that is not supporting the colluding group will be denied.

Darkstar is certainly not selecting the most valuable posters and there are clearly some very untrustworthy members being sponsored and their trust abuse and scammer supporting does place the entire board at greater risk.

Chipmixer will certainly be negatively impacted by this off things do not change.

Darkstar should stop relying on the gamed and worthless self provided metrics that merit sources and DT slather themselves up with. Do his own deep investigations.

He should also consider rotating positions so every good poster that is trustworthy get a taste.

Yeah, it's ironic that they cry "racism!", which implies that they don't want to be judged as a group, but as individuals, and yet they're probably the most nationalistic group on the forum and the one through which runs a particularly nasty attitude--collectively.  It could be that it's just the most vocal of the bunch that's giving them all a bad name, but I'm not hearing a lot of dissent in their ranks.

Turkey isn't a race, either. 

I wouldn't say Chipmixer or any other campaign shouldn't accept anyone from the Turkish section.  They should be judged by the same standards as anyone else.  But if I'm not mistaken most campaigns still only pay for posts in English, and some of the writing I've seen by the loudest of the Turkish posse is just atrocious.  It's no wonder why they're not getting into the Chipmixer campaign, though I don't know about any of the others.

It's like saying all Bitcoiner are criminal because 1.1% of total cryptocurrency transaction is associated with criminal activity^[1]

Besides, you claim that "sponsoring many of the forums dangerous members", but i have yet to see research which analyze all participant whether they're "dangerous" or not.
Prove your statement by analyzing all ChipMixer participant, you can start by looking at list of ChipMixer participant^[2]

Source :
1. https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/cryptocurrency-crime-2020-report (https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/cryptocurrency-crime-2020-report)
2. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit?usp=sharing (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit?usp=sharing)

Thepharmacist is supporting 2 proven scammers. Has been caught greedy and racist trolling with sockpuppet HugeBlackWoman for highest paying signatures.
Where is your plethora of high value original posts?
Dishonest, cheater, racist shitposter. Clear examples.
Many on the Turkish board are far more knowledgeable and produce far higher quality posts.
Etfbitcon if chipmixer has knowledge even one they sponsor is racist, scammer or trust abuser to place in danger other members they are culpable and must give answer in public this is their intention. To sponsor this behaviour.
You are not suitable, darkstar chose you not based valuable posts and trustworthy behaviour  
He is full of shit hiring racist, low value greedy cheater and scammer supporting.

Do he thepharmacist deny you are responsible for HugeBlackWoman insulting racist anti semite and nasty behavior?

Chipmixer hire this member and not honest valuable poster because nepotism and racist bias.

Coincidentally chipmixer sponsored racists and cheaters come to defend chipmixer nepotism and mates club

What a surprise seeing newbie alt-account imbeciles bonesjonesreturns along with truth or dare playing good-doggy-fetch with equally imbecilic Vispilio in this pointless thread.

They share the all the quintessential elements that general low-life trolls and attention seeking fools possess what has really made them frustrated is that they have been unable to get on to the Chipmixer campaign therefore they have accused various community members of sabotage and then also turned on the hand they wanted to feed them by citing racism.

Very disgusting behaviour by that tiny minority from the Turkish language board headed by deluded fool Vispilio. By enlarge the majority of the Turkish language board are excellent members of this forum but these handful of trolls have really tried to ruin for the rest of them.

The reason they appointed a campaign manager is to take care of these activities and he is doing a good job and they are satisfied with the way the campaign is run and the selection process is always the campaign managers discretion and there is no point in crying about that.

---

Suppose you are the campaign manager of Chipmixer i would like to see your list of high quality posters in your opinion and then i will respond to your nepotism and racist bias claims in a forum where everyone is known as alias behind a laptop :P :D . I am seeing these kind of threads quite often and it is quite funny and cringe worthy to be frank and wanted to know your real story behind these claims ;).

Someone exposed ban evasion and other shenanigans on the Turkish board, and that someone happened to be wearing a Chipmixer signature.

If they are satisfied with him hiring proven racist dishonest cheaters and trust abusers, these are dangerous and destroy huge trust system and can destroy our free speech. then that could be something people should be aware wheb using their service.

If I will be the campaign manager I will not have proven racists like HugeBlackWoman ThePharmacist or any one abusing the trust system or anyone supporting scammers. Post value will not spoil chipmixer like this ones  but of course I will not want all from one group in meta who posts the same thing and fighting all times. Many are posting no valuable points of their own and a lot in meta. Chipmixer must be stupid to waste payment on chipmixer in meta on this rabble   

What nonsense are you going on about now? Just because your alter-ego was not selected for the Chipmixer campaign does not make the campaign manager a racist.

None of you deserved to be part of the campaign. Instead of looking at your behaviour and trying to change so you could apply on the next occasion the Chipmixer campaign are open for candidates, you shout "racist". Pathetic.

Vispilio is now rightfully displaying the thegeomadao.com banner which guarantees just a percentage of bounty tokens whenever they will be released.

Just want to point out this is definitely cryptohunter's alt (as well as truth or dare). He felt he wasn't getting enough of a reaction when trying to be "mild-mannered" under truth or dare, so he's invented yet another persona to attack the same group of people on the forum. The only thing different is he is using two alts concurrently instead of sticking to just the one.

How do I know?

There's only 5 instances on the forum of someone using the term "proven racist." One belongs to CryptoSparks, two belong to cryptohunter, and two belong to bonesjonesreturns.



They are also similarly obsessed with the same topics: ChipMixer, trust abuse, merit, and DT.

As well as the same users: The Pharmacist, Lauda, JollyGood, mosprognoz

Also, nobody brings up HugeBlackWoman except for him. Probably because nobody cares.

The fact that they are pretending to now be a non-native English speaker is kind of amusing. But this is definitely cryptohunter, upping his trolling game by running 2 alts at the same time.

To get to the topic, ChipMixer does have 1 Turkish member: Kalemder (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487377). So are they not racist now, or just less racist?

Yeah that was a dead giveaway.


Not anymore: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754

Thus the recent wave of accusations of racism.

The obsession with cryptohunter is excellent. Every member presenting the truth should be thought of as cryptohunter.  

Everyone is cryptohunter. A proven racist is the proof of proven cryptohunter.

The proof of trolling is simply the proof of telling the truth.
I have been looking into nutildahs history. I will address it on his own thread.

Being a proven crytohunter alt myself according to the sold account of nutildah and alt of lauda, I want to say that I do not say DarkStar is anywhere near as bad as many of these other proven scammer supporters and trust abusers. He is likely just wishing for an easy life here.

Chipmixer reputation is being damaged by sponsoring Those members that abuse the trust system.

Nutildah claims nobody cares about ThePharmacists use of a puppet account to racist troll spam for the highest dog returns he could milk from the forum. Nobody cares at chipmixer it seems. Racist trolling sneaky sock puppet Sig spamming  is cool with them right?


Nutildah also claims that nobody should care that he has demonstrated he will facilitate scamming for around 300 dollars and will try to delete evidence once this was brought to the attention if other members.

Suchmoon supports both of these members but tries to silence members that raise these points.

Suchmoon supports proven scammers like lauda and is trying to prevent objective transparent standards that would ensure equal treatment of all members.

Chipmixer as you can see sponsors suchmoon who runs away from debating laudas scamming. Suchmoon prefers to pretend to be objective while doing all he can to prevent The subjective gamed metrics being abolished.

Lol wut?  You're supposed to bungle up your English with the other account.  Did you lose track?

---

Chipmixer is being promoted by the best representatives on the forum.  Look their spreadsheet and you'll find a very diverse crowd of knowledgeable, helpful, polite, and respectful individuals.  There are a handful of Chipmixer promoters that post in Meta and Reputation, and they don't always agree.  In fact, there has been at least one Chipmixer promoter in recent months that has been quite critical of many DT1 members, and has even sided Tecshare's "guild."  So your observations are, once again, flawed.  Your perspective has been skewed by your hatred and jealousy, to the point where you can't see "observable facts."

---

Oh, really?  Please expand on that claim.  ::)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102296.0).

Hi suchmoon.

Where to start with such a sloppy mess.

Ok, let's break it down and destroy it.

Proven racist is proof of proven cryptohunter. Read nutildahs proof of proven cryptohunter. You'll get it eventually.

Your sig spamming opinion on chipmixer sponsored trust abusers and therefore the danger they place the forum at by devaluing that system is of no interest. You need to debunk the clear examples of chipmixer trust abusers that have been provided many times over.

As previously mentioned there is no requirement to demonstrate all are trust abusers or scammer supporters. Only that some are and that they still remain chipmixer sponsored.

It is nice that you recognize lauda as being the obvious scammer reference being made. I maintain suchmoon remains a scammer supporter.

* they support another auction scammer. and self confessed trust abuser

* they support a self confessed willing scam facilitator for pay

* they did include lauda for a long time it is also as they know not required for lauda to remain in DT for now

* they stabbed Theymos in the back and tried to undermine his reasonable suggestion to remove a proven scammer, extortionist , shady escrow and trust abuser from a position of trust

* There are many ways to support a scammer and their potential to scam and abuse outside of including them

* they stalk and try to discredit any serious critic of lauda

* they never openly agree to discuss the undeniable scamming of lauda

* they will not red trust lauda or flag him for scamming

thanks for allowing me to assist your understanding of my clearly undenible and irrefutable points.

I am more than happy to open a thread to debate this if you like.

This is about chipmixer and sponsorship of trust abusers, the dangers they pose and the scammer supporting shit posters they sponsor. This I maintain is clearly a very robust POV and you Will find it impossible to debunk. I invite you to try. This thread should be long and active.

Dude, nearly all of your posts are about complaining that someone is trust abusing the system. A truly new user doesn't know about these things. This is your first post for reference:


Am I listening to someone's alt? Because it smells like it.

I have learned that when a newbie posts only on meta they are likely someone's alt. (true this isn't meta but most of these topics are about trust abuse which is beyond newbies' realm.)


I think this is also someone's alt, each one of their 162 posts is ranting either about the trust system, Lauda, nutildah, or some other senior member...

I have both of these imbeciles on my ignore list now, in accordance to my policy of only putting trolls on my ignore list. When I post on threads like these it's only to out probable alts.

---

P.S. while I'm here, can anyone else here explain what kind of action the forum staff should take on serial harassers like these? Do they ban people for polluting the forum too much? I think theymos banned Matthew N. Wright when he started trolling like this too (this was after he scammed), didn't he?

You can try reporting off topic posts. Other than that "Ignore" is the best option. cryptohunter figured that one out and is trying to get around it by creating new accounts, which gets him a few replies but he gets outed (or outs himself) fairly quickly nowadays.

Polluting the forum with what is the truth and robust arguments? That should be a banned?

Thank you for the entertaining idea.
Better idea to delete idiots who goes off topic and avoid tackling the point of the thread.

Stay on topic and understand you can not be in chipmixer yet but you seem almost stupid and corrupt enough to be on the waiting list. Just a little more scammer protecting and supporting with a twist more of shitpoat and you will be there.

Or be like ~suchmoon ignore what he is afraid to answer.

The following three users have been added to my IGNORE list again because it is impossible to try to the engage with any of them in a civilised manner. They are utter and complete imbeciles that are deluded:

bonesjonesreturns
truth or dare
Vispilio

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.0

This one is best for debating JollyGood coward scam hunting. He can only punish not DT members who work with scams. If you are DT or may be influential for sigs, campaign manager or popular JollyGood will not mention if you will work with scams. Even scams he become crazy about himself.

He is not accepted on chipmixer so we don't need to discuss JollyGood on this thread.

Here we will debate the trust abusers and scammer supporting dangerous members and proven racists that chipmixer sponsors.

Well said and one thing I learnt in life is to make peace with oneself by accepting defeat which will make ones to work towards the betterment of himself rather than making false/lame excuses.
With that been, I'm sure every member of this forum except the Jr member and newbies understand the criteria that the Chipmixer campaign manager wanted.

Spoken like an experienced loser. Thank you, now please not more sig spamming off topic stupidity and tackle my specific points that are supported by irrefutable evidence.
Blanket statement from ass licking chipmixer dreamers as nauseating.
Do you wish to pick a specific point and attempt to make successful refutation?
Go suck off campaign manager in PM not here suzy

You can add to the list this gem from one of the current ChipMixer Signature Campaign participants:

Archive [1a (https://archive.vn/bIhlf#selection-1543.16-1547.17)], [1b (https://web.archive.org/web/20200327034856/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235038.msg54103332%23msg54103332)]


Basically, marlboroza is saying it is okay for him to swear and abuse others while receiving $5-$6 per post from ChipMixer but others aren't allowed to post in topics of their choice for a tenth of (per week) of what he gets paid for his just one abusive post.

There is the disgrace.

I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.  Wake up to these people they are corrupt self serving scum

It seems chipmixer is paying this member to protect and support scamming by trying to label whistleblowers and trolls


He needs to present specific examples of the "trolling" or that makes him a liar and troll.

He appears to be a scammer supporter.
I support chipmixer but they must not pay scammers and scammer supporters.

I will wear their sig if i can donate all of my earnings to good causes on the forum
Those earning money and keeping it for themselves should be replaced by less selfish individuals.

Get rid of scammers and scammer supporters from your pay roll.

Proof, or it never happened.


chipmixer certainly has inadvertently brought a motley crew together.

I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out and you gave them red for swearing at malboroza.
If you say it was for something else i will not dispute this now. When I observed it and read the reference  that was the conclusion i had drawn. The reference does include some other scammer sympathizers getting whipped on the same post so it may have been for criticizing one of those.  Marlboroza appeared to be the primary recipient of the lashing.


Eventually it will become evident that chipmixer inadvertently is motivating and sponsoring some serious scammers and is the core driving force behind a lot of the double standards and 2 tier system that these below average posters need to leverage so they may take these top paying sig spots.

Their "trustworthyness" is gamed and manipulated between them hence why they circle the wagons when members uncover irrefutable scamming by one of the scam gang. They know their individual safety is dependent upon each.

Darkstar must by now be fully aware of their actions. He is reluctant to comment or shrinks away from public debate over his employees conduct. This reflects very poorly upon him. If he thought they were entirely innocent then why not demonstrate this via public debate and analysis.

Archive [1a (https://archive.vn/oFpQ1)], [1b (https://web.archive.org/web/20200420075742/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229890.msg54260017)]


I'll say again:

---

---

Here's what I wrote:

The-One-Above-All's trust feedback wall:

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob40fac720aa777fc3.jpeg

...and...

cryptohunter's Trust Feedback Wall:

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/bloba6180ba1e5fec85b.jpeg
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blobedb8cb5b49615b3b.jpeg

Here are the three links:

• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0
• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49714728#msg49714728
• http://archive.fo/RDVrH#selection-4277.0-4353.108

If you look at the second and third links (which are archives BTW) cryptohunter is attacking marlboroza and in essence I have defended marlboroza by giving cryptohunter negative feedback trust BECAUSE of that post.

Here is what @cryptohunter wrote about @marlboroza

---

---

Do you even know who you are fighting, or why?

That seems to support exactly what I said.

He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.

There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.  

Perhaps calling out means something different to you  that is where the confusion is.  

Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.

I'm just taking your comment here as I've got some interesting questions to ask you.

What are you up to? Is it that you're not fine with the people here who are advertising Chipmixer signature? It's been 3 years (if not less) for them with these members and I've also been a member of it for around 2 years and never had such issues, nor am I so badly dissatisfied like you. And you're only pointing out Marlboroza which makes it clear that you don't have issues with ^the rest of the Chipmixer army^? :P

I've seen the case with Marlboroza where I think there was no foul play done from their end (I'm not supporting anyone but speaking what I understood after investigating about the deep truth to the best of my knowledge).

I don't get this Lauda part, that even if someone likes/supports any member on the forum that you don't like, what makes you feel so bad that you just write it out and call out someone for their following deeds? Also don't understand the "double standards" part, can you explain what exactly it is in your views?

I have no issues with chipmixer.  I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated directly to good causes.

What if a member is supporting and protecting a proven scammer?
What if members try to trust abuse whistleblowing on scammers?

Why did you leave chipmixer?

Earnings? Wait! What?
Volunteering for Chipmixer pays off? I've never heard about that ever?!?  ???
How did you earn through them at first? Donation is far another subject, but how did you earn from Chipmixer? Were you a member of the campaign? Wait, your account rank isn't allowed to participate in their campaign, this means you're posting from your alt because you need to have an account with Sr. Member or above rank to be able to participate in Chipmixer campaign.


I'd only ask you one thing here:
"Any firm evidence please?"
Are you butthurt because you're someone with a higher rank yet not a DT but seeing DTs supporting him due to the fact that in their views, that ^whistleblower^ is the right person to go with?


Do you think anybody is a fool to leave such a privileged campaign? I got removed just like some other members because I believe that DS has got enough reasons to keep / remove anyone in / from the campaign and I always respect their personality as well as their decisions.

Let's take it one step at a time.

I have not worked with chipmixer previously.

Perhaps.


That much is true.

This means you've got no evidence but you're trying to throw mud over somebody's personality just because "you felt that they are doing something wrong", you felt.


Watch your own words, mate. I believe it's you only who said this? :

Eh, i remember times when Chipmixer was just a campaign for lazy nerds which couldn't find worthy ICO bounty (some of them could awarded you with 1 btc for a month with shitty signature) . But now, after ico's death there too much drama about this signature campaign.

Guys, calm down, even 1200 dollars per month doesn't worth to drown your own reputation and honour (like what happened with many turkish members). There a lot now free courses of programming. Better find one which will fit you the best and then you will get much more (in time)  :)

No. It's just that you are in a hurry to attribute meaning that is not there.

If you volunteer to do something it doesnt essentially mean that is has yet taken place

Just so I'm clear, is English your first language? Perhaps this could explain the interaction so far?

You'll have to detail who you're taking about specifically. Which member?
Who is the somebody?

Exactly true, there was a time when nobody took Chipmixer campaign so seriously as the days when it started, BTC was not even $1k (if I'm not wrong) and the payment was BTC0.0375 max which still is, the only difference is the price that has caught the eyes of all these members who are willing to be a part of their campaign.


I guess nobody here is interested in learning anything because of (either) their nature or the fact that they don't have the potential to learn it. They want easy money as they all think that way about Chipmixer too (but they don't know that Chipmixer participants are so different in their own class), but I'd urge everyone who are willing to do something - please learn a lot before applying for any signature campaign as it takes efforts to be in one, as well as your knowledge is all that matters for which you get paid. During this pandemic period, I guess we all have basic internet facility available at our homes, so it's better if you'd spend more time looking into so many different aspects (and even courses if you'd like to learn something else) and you may then come to teach everyone about it if you explore and create something new from your skills.

---

I believe that if English would have been a first language of yours, you may not have questioned me this.  ;D
Don't try to pretend a fool here, you already know whom I'm speaking about.

Believe me, when the price of bitcoin increases by a factor of 8 or around that (and it will happen eventually), you're also going to start seeing a lot of threads complaining about what's now "small money" like Bitvest and 777coin sponsoring bigots/boogeymen/<insert derogatory word here>.

People tend to complain because of their inability to prove themselves (handicapped brains or minds whatever you call them) and such people love mudding over the names of popular projects just to catch some part of their fame while only trying to degrade / defame them. No wonder if BTC shows a major move, you said it right that what's being seen as very low numbers in BTC will also be addressed as defamatory campaigns providing money to their campaign members to scam / spam / <use your own term here>. ;D

I expect English is not your first language. This is not a ctiticism.

No. You'll have to define the member you are referring to. That would be the only possible way for me to answer your question.
The " volunteer" aspect I hope we have cleared up now.

Your premise seems to be that I have some financial motivation for this thread.
That has been debunked conclusively since I have volunteered to wear their signature and all of the earnings can be directly sent to good causes or even donated to the forum for as many years as I post.

The purpose is as stated to ensure chipmixer has access to information regarding the behaviors of those members they are sponsoring.

You probably should take some time to read the thread rather than rushing in hoping to say whatever you think could garner you favour with chipmixer that could potentially lead to you being allowed back on the chipmixer campaign.

You must realise that most long term members have no need to sig spam. Any member that has been here pre 2017 and certainly pre 2014 should not need to wear sig scavenging btc via sig payments.
Best not to judge others by your own failures.

Keep spamming your sig and milking the forum though.  I mean clearly you have failed these last years to escape the need to wear a sig :)

There are only 2 possibilities for pre 2014 members wearing sig to earn btc.

1. Total losers that just fucked up 2 huge bulls and are not wealthy.
2.  Greed.

So enough derailing with possible motives for presenting independently verifiable evidence of untrustworthy behaviors.

Also once you define the member you are referring to ( why scared?) We will see analyse them in public...
I wonder if you will keep avoiding telling me which member you are specifically referring  to?

Hurry up, I don't wish to waste much time on those afraid to answer questions.

If you are too scared to answer ? Why join in?

Lol at chipmixer spammers being in their own class? Please tell me more??
They are certainly scammer supporters and scared little bitches oh and racists etc
Most of them will run away if you request their 10 best original thought provoking posts for analysis
As for asking them to provide their largest achievement here that made a lasting difference?

Lol - someone asked the pharmacist " can you tell us your largest achievement since joining the forum around 5 years ago? "

The pharmacist said  " getting on to a highly paid sig campaign "

Haha

Most chipmixer spammers are untrustworthy scammer supporting shit posters with zero lasting achievements.
Hope I cleared that up for you.

The fact you were removed, and posters like thepharmacist remain, is .....well you work it out.

You should have a look at some of the earliest Signature Campaigns - the Campaign Managers were enticing participants to created between 4,000 and 6,000 posts *per month*.  Creating shit posts for pennies isn't just a new experience, it's been entrenched in the Forum practically since the dawn of BitCoin itself.

The accusations had to come from somewhere and the most obvious culprits would have been a minority of users associated with that particular language board.

For those unfamiliar with the situation, here is the same user (Kalemder) trying to become Merit Source before those plans were thankfully countered by users: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183702.0

E-X-A-C-T-L-Y! You're definitely right! There so much free courses, for example Coursera (the biggest platfrom for online courses) have made all own courses free. It's time to learn something about crypto currency or maybe more. And not bitching about being reject in Chipmixer application.

Bitcoin course which is free now - https://www.coursera.org/learn/cryptocurrency . It's better to spend time on this.

I'm from India and yes, I proudly say that English isn't my first language, but we still respect it and write the capital 'E'.


Marlboroza I was referring to. You've been behind his back since I was watching the latest of the thread.


I got your point now, that even if you're not their part but just show their advertisement, you expect your "unofficial" earnings to be sent to the forum or to some good cause. Maybe I'm right now.  :D


That's good, but why not state these things to DarkStar first and then go to Chipmixer while you know that DarkStar is your way to reach them?


For your info, I never ever topped their max posts even once since I was in their campaign. Was just in it because I loved their *no minimum posts" rule. Trust me, I'm not like those dying to get a spot in it (I never gave up and never misbehaved when removed out of the one and only highest paid campaign) and I'm not in a hurry to get into it as well. ;)


Are you a teacher? Because I'm getting a feeling that this is a class going on. :D And my failure? Uh yeah, I just earned BTC but always spent it because I'm a spender and not a saving personality. I love to spend it as money, that's my point of view that you won't understand. Good for you though.


I'm not wealthy, seriously. I just spent everything as I said.
Greed?! Umm yeah, somewhat. :D I hope this satisfied your ego after hearing this.


Told you above. But scared?! Neh, I don't even fear God now, just think where your "uncomplicated fear" comes in my mind. Wooaahh! Scared!  ::)


Look up a bit again, you've got your answer already about that "afraid" part. :)


I'm not jealous enough yet to figure it out, once I believe my mind is in such state, I'll definitely try to work it out. Thanks for the suggestion.