Bitcoin Forum

after years of lauda calling people to be banned or punished for copy and paste.. this scammer lauda has been deliberately and sneakily grafting copy and paste into his own paragraphs??

Lauda was supporting nullius giving a red tag to CH because ch dared to show empathy to some legends who had copy and paste years ago. Such is the evil of plagiarism says lauda that even showing them empathy is reason enough for a red tag.

Look at this sneaky deliberate plagiarism from lauda... not just accidentally not referencing evidence of a huge scam this member lauda was pushing on members.

Lol so this proven scammer, extortionist, and trust abuser who was calling for people to be banned for presenting evidence he was lying to promote a scam is now also a deliberate and sneaky plagiarist??

Could one member be more fucking net negative.

2 year sig ban minimum but this should be a clear ban when you consider all the other scamming,  trust abusing , extorting and double standards. What a disgusting double standards piece of lying shit.  

Read this



Combined with this ..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5249969.0

And this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

And  now threatening to red tag any turkish member that applies for and is accepted to chipmixer?

Wtf is theymos doing with this scamming,  extorting,  trust abusing, racist  double standards scumbag?

Now some sneaky obviously deliberate plagiarism too.

This is getting funny now.

Is there anything deliberately dishonest or dangerous this piece of shit has not done yet.

Screaming for others to be banned or sig banned for the crime of telling the truth about his scamming.

This is sneaky as fuck plagiarism not just leaving some quotes off of something you are posting 100x to warn people about scammers that happend to be lauda and the project he was pushing.

Still his DT colluders are trying to prop up the illusion lauda is not a scamming and dangerous piece of shit.


Net negative scamming extorting trust abusing racist and plagiarising scum. Aka " suboptimal "

What the fuck? People got banned for a lot less than these.

I don't think any member has ever been busted for


1. Proven scamming
2. Highly probable serious extortion
3. Super shady looking escrow
4. Undeniable racist threats and persecution
5. Using red flags to silence people whistleblowing on him
6. Using red flags as a bargaining chip for mutual red flag removal between him.and other proven scammers so they get a clean trust sheet
7. Supporting and colluding to protect other proven scammers
8. Deliberate and super sneaky plagiarism


What's not net positive about all that then DT pals ask?

This is excellent work. I mean to be busted for all this and be floating around here with clean positive trust rating, in and out of default trust with a high paying sig lecturing and calling others to be punished for far lesser evils on just one of his offenses...he has racked up 8 big ones. Haha

I bet the conniving cat will just get a sig ban for a couple of years and carry on with milking the board via other rev streams and punishing others for reporting his crimes.

Ban the scamming extorting trust abusing racist double standards greedy cunt and all of his ardent supporters and protectors.
At least blacklist everyone of the scum enabling these dirt bags.

Where is nullius that pervy old creep. I have heard him screaming about the evils of plagiarism and there being no greater evil since that scumbag awoke and red tagged the only person to stand up to this scamming piece of shit lauda since it joined here ...for having empathy.

Why so quiet in here? Where is the plagiarism bingo now?

I love it , lauda and his zillion to 1 bullshit lies that only his punked out biatch quicksellout7 would support

" must have been a few things I read somewhere that stuck in my mind that I accidentally paraphrased word for word in large paragraphs"  or sneakily grafted into his own crap.

Hahahahhah

Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies...

Is there a conceivable dirty greedy dishonest untrustworthy crime this scum bag has not committed and got busted for?

Where are all his DT pals screaming for any plagiarist to be banned.

Where does the ... I must have a photographic memory that I have no recollection  or control of go on the plagiarism bingo lol?

To the true legend that located these ( and perhaps a few others) you are a super achiever in the context of the dregs here.
Instant legendary vip status if we were in a real meritocracy.


Where is lauda? Cat got your tongue scammer?

Its ok, Lauda has plenty of socks and minions to do their bidding on the off chance the rules are equitably applied here.

I don't know about the socks, minions, or how much theoretical power they wield if they do exist, but I am very curious as to what the outcome of this is going to be, and I've expressed some of my thoughts about it in the report plagiarism (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg54476831#msg54476831) thread. 

If nothing is done and Lauda suffers no consequences, can you imagine how many banned members are going to start crawling out of the porous, rotten woodwork to complain that they weren't given the same chance to rectify what a lot of them claimed to be mistakes?  True, some of them are just serial plagiarists doing it in the name of earning money through sig campaigns (and Lauda does not fit in that category), but there might be a small but significant number of them who would have a valid argument.

Do these proofs check out?

If so.... .. ... ...    .  . . .. . . . . .  .. . . .. .. . .... .. . . . . .. ..

We have a happening folks..

Im gonna need a metric ton of popcorn to watch this all play out....

For or from? I have responded in the other thread. I do not think I need to respond twice to the same thing.

https://www.lovethispic.com/uploaded_images/146832-Dark-Cat-Shadows.jpg?1

He already responded (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg54473176#msg54473176). He gave an explanation for 3 of the 6 instances referenced in the OP. I don't know if his explanation passes muster, I will let others debate that.

It appears someone went to fairly great lengths to look for plagiarism, not that this makes any of the plagiarism okay.

I am unable to think of any argument against instituting a two-year signature ban. Others who were caught plagiarising years ago also received a 60 day ban.

What I really wonder is, what the plagiarism bot was doing? It found lots of people with that offense but somehow skipped lauda which had multiple offenses.

Is the bot dumb or was it because the data was too big (26k posts) so it said "fuck it im skippin it"

Checking every post for plagiarism is not scalable. The more posts the userbase writes, the more processing power is required to check the next post against all other posts for plagiarism. It is also expensive to check someone's posts against all other posts in the forum, and the costs go up if you are checking if parts of posts are plagiarized. As a result, targets of plagiarism investigations need to be targeted.

To demonstrate the cost of checking for plagiarism:
If you check every group of 5 consecutive words in each post in a user's post history against every group of 5 consecutive words in every other post that exists:
Assuming the userbase has made 50 million posts, 40 million of which (80%) has at least 5 words, and the average post length is 15 words.
Each post you check for plagiarism would cause you to make 11 queries, and each query would check against 440 million rows in your database. So each post you check would need to be compared against 4.84 billion rows.

You can do some things to speed up searching, but this can only do so much. You can also randomly skip rows you are looking at, and skip queries against the rows you do look at, but this will make it less than certain you will find all instances of plagiarism.

None of this would detect the majority of the plagiarism referenced in the OP when posts are copied from external sources.

Not that I have a cat in this fight, but at least a few of those examples don't seem to fit the bill for paraphrasing. Its a little iffy but somewhat reasonable if an uncommon phrase sticks in your head, but it'd appear to me that the likelihood of of it being a simple memorable phrase decrease when your sentence structure is the same and there are sort of uncommon bits of stylization where you'd expect it to say or

example 4 is full of the signs of plagiarism that sort of sticks out in people's coursework. Stuff like putting the ö in Schrödinger’s is fairly uncommon unless you are copy and pasting, as not many people know how to type a ö. Consistencies in stylistic/ideological capitalization, like Spirit, and other little things like (the Holy Spirit). Though at least you didn't plagiarize the colon :P

I wouldn't call any of that conclusive evidence for failing someone, but you look for other patterns from there.

Think again. Quite the common letter depending on where I am from. :P

I do not know what happened there. The only difference that I could find was 'he' vs. 'He' in the source, the topic or the source do not sound like something I would read.

Remembering events of 5 - 6 years ago with this post count is rather difficult. I've already spent a lot of time looking into what happened there and I am missing some key historical dates that I can not access.

Or perhaps the bot is being used in a more targeted way as an automatic peanut hunting machine.

ban lauda! Is he a god here? why moderators and staff can't ban lauda? It's clearly a plagiarism.

No reason should be accepted, all the other members are ban because of plagiarism, now we have lauda and the moderators and staff can't do shit.

It's madness to check everything against everything. If I'd be chasing this (which I'm not), I'd create a checksum for each string of text, sort all checksums, search for duplicates, and use those to check back the original posts. This way you don't have to iterate through all posts, but catch them all at once in a very fast process.
Of course there'll be many false positives and the slightest change in a word would be missed, but this cause would have been caught.

haahahahahhaa:)


There is undeniable plagiarism here. and I look forward to the decision of the moderators. Justice requires treating everyone equally.

me too dude

i love bitcointalk drama


I have often also been accused without reason and without possibility of reply
it's not right
wait for the person to reply (I read in the appropriate thread) and then the staff will decide what to do

i take a big popcorn bucket

Quick reminder that OP is also a plagiarist of giant magnitude and hasn't been banned.

lauda plagiarism? BAN

no sorry: PERMABAN

as others are banned, he too must be banned

Let's compare this lauda...


Cryptohunter was copy and pasting a proof that was provided to help cryptohunter prove that his orignal instamine claim was correct.  Cryptohunter correctly referenced this tons of times and missed off the reference a few times. These quotes were at the top of his instamine thread and that off all the others that started threads to crush the scam being pushed by lauda himself. There was no chance cryptohunter was trying to pass this off as his own.

The best part is cryptohunter used this to bust a scam that lead to the board being offered 2 000 000 000 usd compensation.

This same scam was being pushed by lauda who was scamming people into believing there was no instamine. Lauda was saying he was on the launch and could confirm there was no instamine.

Lol at trying to spin that into net negative hahahhahhahhhahaha

Cryptohunter was using text provided to help him force a scam to pay 2000 000 000 usd to the forum the same scam lauda was promoting

Hahahah

Yeah that's a fucking accident after he referenced the same quote 100x nothing like this deliberate sneaky grafting shit into his own words and where is his 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer to the forum??? Nowhere !!!the scamming cunt lauda was telling people he was on the launch and could confirm there was no instamine.

Fuck off you retarded cunt. There was never a more net positive member since satoshi himself.



Now lauda is fucking a proven scammer who was trying to prevent the forum having a 2000 000 000 dollar compensation pay out and scamming investors , an extortionist,  a trust abuser , full on greedy self serving shit stain

Now lauda is found to be sneaky and deliberately grafting plagiarism into his own words clearly deliberately and sneakily trying to sound smart while searching around for stuff to copy and paste after years of wanting to punish others for less viscous plagiarism.

I would like the poll that shot down the  2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer made transparent. I bet that scamming cunt lauda voted against it and cost the forum a chance at benefitting from all the hard work cryptohunter put in.

This is not comparable. You scammer supporting shit stain

Using evidence provided to help him win a 2 000 000 000 usd compensation from the same scam lauda was pushing us net negative you say hahaha

The same scam lauda was helping scam investors hahahah

Change your user name to scumbag now you dumb cunt.

I agree let's give cryptohunter VIP status and remove the fucking red tags that scamming cunt lauda put on his account for daring to tell the truth lauda is a scammer.

This is deliberate sneaky plagiarism grafting other peoples shit into his own trying to hide it up.

Minimum 10 yr sig ban.

Considering he is a fucking proven scammer and all his other sneaky greedy scamming shit he should have been banned years ago.

All these greedy scamming trust abusing net negative scum should be banned.

Rid the board of this plague of chipmixer fortunejack self appointed self serving scum milking the forum dry and crushing free speech.

Theymos has given lauda chance after chance after chance.  I want the scammer banned obviously but if he is not banned for scamming people or extorting people or trust abusing whistleblowers then the chances of lauda getting banned ever are super slim.

10 yr sig ban and blacklisted from all DT forever is the best we can hope for. He should be forced to only select default trust also no helping his scamming pals any more.

I tell you what though, considering his net negative scamming extorting and trust abusing past every deliberate sneaky plagiarist ever banned will be asking for the same deal.  Then again since most are only interested in sig money perhaps they will not.

You might be underestimating false positives - it's a killer when you're dealing with 50 million posts. 1% false positive rate would require you to review 500 thousand posts manually, unfeasible. So you probably want to tune the parameters to the point where you have very few false positives even if it comes at a cost of letting some (or many) plagiarists slip through so that you could still catch many others without wading through almost identical bounty reports and other crap.

Are you the member that discovered laudas copy and paste?
Do you accept laudas explanation of how this accident happened?
Do you have a script?

What you are describing would only detect entire posts that are copied. If someone added a single word, the post would not be flagged as a duplicate. I have also noticed that some plagiarists like to copy parts of posts/content, sometimes from different sources. Also sorting as you describe is just another way of checking every post against every other post. This is how you would put everything in the correct order.

You could index parts of the text (for example the first word or the first letter of the first word) to reduce runtime, but the cost to check each post against every other post is still expensive.

I might give it a shot if I have the time some day :)

Example:
What you are describing would > 4081ffba8ba8e9aa702ba47c868c86ab
you are describing would only > a4476131d8f6a76d09daabe2c0e12ff5
are describing would only detect > f805a9b6e8756ec0e7e8d9d9b9f6085e
would only detect entire posts that > 3190387c55974545cf2d2045197ee70b

After generating the checksums, only the checksums have to be sorted and searched for duplicates. I've used that before to find matching Bitcoin addresses in very long lists, and it only takes seconds to search through gigabytes of data. The benefit of this method is being able to use very efficient existing sorting algorithms.

You're on the right path just keep in mind that you would still end up with a nearly unmanageable number of n-grams (which is roughly equivalent to the number of words) and even with n=5 you would have an enormous number of false positives using single n-gram matches. So you would likely need to (1) increase the n or (2) match more than one n-gram per post. #1 is obviously counterproductive and doesn't reduce the dataset, and #2 raises the complexity exponentially. However there are some methods that can help with #2... minhash is what I used. It can be tuned to a wide range of accuracy.

Oh, and anything longer than a 32-bit hash is probably going to take too long to compute to be feasible so you'll need to figure out how to deal with collisions.

I guess lauda finally pissed suchmoon off.
Suchmoon releases these bombs on people when they piss him off.
Suchmoon gave it to mozprognoz another scammer who worked with lauda when they said suchmoon was a fat pig.
Suddenly all the evidence required to demonstrate mozprognoz was willing to work with scams to make money appears from suchmoon.


Anyway we dont need to discuss on this thread the process.

Back to lauda...

1. This is sneaky  and deliberate grafting in the copy and paste between their own words in the same paragraphs
2. Lol at the photographic memory that lauda has no recollection of or control over bullshit excuse
3. Lauda says for others that 2 years sig ban is not enough he wants people perm banned
4. You people showing any empathy for lauda are going to be tagged by nullius for empathy
5. Lauda is a proven scammer
6. Lauda was removed from mod for serious extortion
7. Lauda has been banned many times before and given several chances
8. Lauda uses red tags to punish people that present evidence of his scamming
9. Lauda is trading red tag removals with other scammers so they both have a clean trust sheet

Cats have 9 lives.... looks like they just ran the fuck out

We will welcome back every plagiarist unless you can show me they are more net negative than lauda.

Good luck with that. I'm looking forward to going through every part of laudas history in detail with you all.

The scumbag  was pure poison from the moment it joined. Lying and scamming since the start. Time to put the trash out.

I'm all for empathy, fuck nullius who HATES plagiarism in any form.  Where is that filthy old pervert anyway? Surely not avoiding this is he? He will be getting his teeth stuck right kn

Anyway back to my empathy. I would welcome a thorough deep investigation to determine how net positive lauda has been since inception. The deliberate and sneaky plagiarism is beyond doubt.

Let's get to the has lauda been net positive haha

Shall we kick off with his lying and scamming to entice investors with lies and his attempting to and possibly reversing the 2 000 000 000 usd airdrop compensation offer?

Can we have the poll revealed? Which scumbags voted quickly to prevent the airdrop.
I actually think it could have been a turning point in crypto. If that 2 000 000 000 or 20m at the time airdrop has been made to the board would have been a huge point in the history of crypto.

I would love to know if one of that small number of votes to reverse the offer was laudas?

For historical purposes could those votes be made transparent? Super interesting.

People should be held to their own standards, lauda says 2 years sig ban is not enough for others who are more net positive than him. Lauda says perm ban. I would be more empathetic partly becuae the scum bag has lot of alts anyway. Also if lauda is banned who will be my whipping boy scammer bitch to slap around with the truth?

Even tman the auction scammer has run off.

Only nutildah will remain and he never fights back.

Lol at at all these corrupt cunt DT scum. Baying for the perm ban blood of otherwise innocent legends with their plagiarism bingo card
No mercy at all then was there ?

Now their scamming master is busted no calls for perm ban?

Where is the plagiarism bingo?

The photographic memory I have no recollection of excuse.  That is top of the bingo excuses.

All your favourite scammer excusionists are here.  We will time travel, reverse the meaning of words to their opposite,  voice opinions that should not be based reason....all your favs

I'm going to start listing all the old plagiarism appeal threads to remind you how viscous and evil these same DT were to people for way less devious and sneaky plagiarism. 

Sickening double standards.

If lauda escapes perm ban AGAIN then let's hope he gets banned from being " default trust" and milking any rev streams here at all forever.
He will abandon the account anyway it's all about the $

No.


What explanation? I've seen Lauda saying that he doesn't remember copying, which is possible after 5 years.


I have a lot of scripts. Relevance?

None of these (Scamming, racist threats, dt manipulation, extortion etc etc - not saying he/she did all of those) are a ban offense other than the point 8. (plagiarism) Which is a decision for a moderator. Somebody at high ups will eventually have to speak about this.

They are not alone.

They are when you start to assess whether the member is net negative.

That’s a good point—or it would be, if Lauda were a fully fluent English speaker.  I have seen her make similar grammatical mistakes herself.  The brain does tend to autocorrect such infelicities, even when one intentionally tries to repeat a phrase by rote; but would that happen, with a person who may make the same mistake?


Spelling police here.  “Schrodinger” would be a misspelling.  “Schrödinger” is correct; and “Schroedinger” is correct, albeit not preferred.  To drop the umlaut is unacceptable.

I generally judge people’s intelligence based on such details as whether or not they properly expand the umlaut when restricted to ASCII;^* and if this were coursework, I would take points off for a sloppy misspelling of the name of a famous physicist.  “Schrodinger” looks almost as bad as “Hiesenburg”.  Anyway, I do not think that orthographic correctness can ever be taken as evidence of copying and pasting.

(* I do make allowances for people from completely non-European cultures; but any literate European should know the umlaut rule, not only German speakers.  N.b. that the umlaut is not the same as the diaeresis, which is used in such English words as “coöperate”; the latter is no longer popular in English, but is still prescribed by the style guides of some intellectual publications.  A motto for proper reëducation:  You are not a chicken, so don’t turn coöperation into a coop!)

---

Phew.  I am so very glad that none of the trolls have noticed my concerted effort to finally correct finally to correct my bad old habit of splitting infinitives.  It is the only significant linguistic difference between my 2017–2018 posts and my 2020 posts.  I am ashamed of the split infinitives, the products of poor childhood education.  I should go through all of my old posts and correct them someday.

---

I think that’s my cue to desist from posting in a troll’s thread.


I have been busy, as evidenced by my recent complete absence from the forum.


LOL.  “bonesjonesreturns” in sum.

Seems they both had a big change of heart

Hahahahahhahahah

Lauda gave 10.merits to that thread trace the thread and read it all.

Get these scumbags all banned. These 2 lovers can have more time for cyber sex together.

Nullius and every member blocking a flag on the basis of indisputable evidence of undeniable scamming by lauda.

All banned or fully blacklisted from DT and no more sigs. Theymos said he will step in on flag abuse
 Let's get on that.

Blah blah blah. Motive is irrelevant.

>If Lauda is banned
>Then you are banned

>If you are not banned after 1.5 years
>Then Lauda won't be banned

Cowardly little twat spewing out lies as usual

Intention is key as theymos has clearly said before want me to quote it you dumb lying cowardly cunt.
Lol at trying again to prevent full context scammer supporter.


Wrong we are not robots you cowardly thick cunt following your dumb fuck rules

He is a net negative scammer and extortionist intentionally grafting this in to his own paragraphs

Read what I wrote again who cowardly piece of crap and debunk it rather than repeat your stupid slobbering.

Also not only read what I have put above shit stain and swallow it

Lauda is demanding people are banned for this plagiarism let him live by his own standards

Cryptohunter was the only person saying legends should not be banned if they are net positive.

So fuck you cowardly slime.

Lol at trying to spin a 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer to the entire forum from the huge scam your scamming cunt lauda was pushing on people as a net negative.

Keep making yourself and all the other goons here looking like corrupt moronic shit stain.

Suchmoon needs to be banned this conniving cunt is protecting and supporting scammers here for way too long.


Suchmoon says the guy that walks into the bank to transfer a billion pounds of his own money to charity and accidentally walks out with the pen he signed it off with needs the death penalty the same as the armed robber who killed 5 customer and 3 cashiers before making off with 500k is stolen money

They both stole from the bank both get the death penalty

What a stupid dumb cowardly shit stain

On top of this lauda wants plagiarists banned and has insisted others are banned for it, let that scamming cunt live by his own standards he is trying to push on others.

Nullius punished cryptohunter with trust abuse for showing empathy to plagiarists
Lauda gave nullius 10 merits for this

Fuck them both ban them nullius and lauda and you suchmoon you skanky scamming supporting coward.

Hope that cleared it up for you

Debunk my points of shut the fuck up

Ban suchmoon.Scammer supporters are just as bad as scammers suchmoon has said it before many times.

I would love an open debate on the achievements of cryptohunter vs the entire DT1 core group of scumbags
I can not find one achievement of any of these people that is outstanding and made a lasting difference
The entire cluster of DT slime that surround and support lauda have achieved absolutely zero haha

Let that sink in

No huge scam busts that made any difference just whack a mole crap
No pushing for fairness in distribution or fair launch protocols
No giving freely investment tips that made people into millionaires from nothing
No fighting for transparent objective standards to ensure all members are treated equally
No fighting for free speech

Nothing all most DT slime want is to maintain the status quo so they like suchmoon can keep spamming their chipmixer sigs and infesting their alts into all the other rev streams because they control the gamed metrics that are used for the selection  process

You may say why out of every case I have reviewed of legends plagiarising do I only want lauda banned?
The answer is simple he is the most net negative person on this forum a true cancer scamming extorting trust abusing free speech crushing cancer.

His malignant spread has infected most of DT. All must be cut away.

Plus he has been demanding plagiarism is a ban for others let this cunt live by his own standards . Him and nullius even made threads going after persons already on 2 year sig ban saying perm ban is required.

Net negative, net positive, suchmoon, nullius, blah blah blah. All irrelevant.

You and Lauda both plagiarizers. Either both banned or neither banned.

1.5 years since I exposed your plagiarism. You still shitpost continually. Therefore, Lauda won't be banned.

Fin.

How sneaky was that ?? Gets a mod to delete original post

ScumBuster tried to edit my quote and then get a mod to delete the original post?

Totally trying to scam people into believing I made a death threat to him?

The original quote said

I will bring the evidence here and cave his skull in with it. Lol at being hurt by evidence of what has been said here previously....well yes scammers would find the truth hurtful.

He gets a mod to delete my original  so it looks like a physical threat.

This is really atrocious behaviour..

But it shows how full context is totally required for full understanding

That is very shady behavior.

Now get back on topic about lauda the proven scammers deliberate plagiarism.

Which I say is a good way to get rid of him after all the scamming, extorting and trust abuse over the years.
He is net negative bye bye.

Anyone claiming he is net positive can provide evidence.

Oh dear.

Death threats are not allowed.  You may not have the intelligence to realize what you wrote was a threat, but it was.

You said you were going to bash his skull in.  How else do you make threats if not with words?

Ask mum for help on this one.

You need to understand words first vod. Lol what a dumb shit you are. Do like how I trip you up with everything I say.

Whoops are you on the floor vod? Lol


It's called an implied metaphor

Yes I will crush your skull like I always do with superior argument. Whoops there I go again.

Now stop derailing my thread dip shit.

That was fast.  Your mum lying beside you or what?

No but your mum knew how to help me explain it to you anyway.

Stop derailing my thread idiot.

Wrong.  She gave me 20 merits for that (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214166.0).  Twenty.

But then, I never expected for you to keep your facts straight.



It is impossible to derail a thread created for the purpose of trolling.  The thing was never on rails to begin with.

Too bad that this rule has evidently fallen into desuetude:

you abused trust system thats ok but please stop a pedophile behavior

already week left and lauda is still not banned
so for what forum rule?

At least on how I see things that would happen. There is in fact that plagiarism has happened with several posts from Lauda, what would likely be the outcome is she will be banned because of it but also she will be unbanned because of a ban appeal (she will have) which would most likely be approved since people will argue about the contributions she had for the forum. A ban really should happen hear if the mods would like to avoid any kind of retaliation from permabanned members and their friends on how Lauda will be getting a free pass for this, at least a due process on an appeal should be fair for all of us.

I think lauda will be signature banned for a long time.

I think lauda will get a temp ban for 30,60,90 days.

But I am pretty much a moron and out of the loop of the  insiders here on BTCTalk.

Correction HE sent you 20 merits. Sorry to ruin tonight's pillow hump though.
Yes, such is the evil of plagiarism that even when nullius was a starving peasant he says he would never consider copy and paste however desperate he was. Those that try to defend it or even empathise with anyone engaging in plagiarism should have a red tag.

Depriving people of their rights to ridicule and scorn plagiarists is disgusting says nullius.

Here he is slobbering around the vile old creep trying to defend his cyber bunny the rotten toothed euro trash pill head lauda for deliberate sneaky grafting and mixed in plagiarism.

It is sneaky and deliberate plagiarism. Tag nullius and make him live by his own stupid standards
Lauda gives out 20 merits confirming it agrees then let them live by the standards they want to push on others.

I want lauda banned for being a undeniable lying scammer who trust abuses those that dare to say they will encourage others to review his post history to see what he is really like.

Nullius is even worse. It would support anything for 2 mins of pillow pumping cyber sex with something that has even a small chance of being female. Lauda obviously spotted this with alia and is giving the old perv blue balls and forcing him to debase and degrade his ugly old ass online with pathetic double standards and hypocrisy.

Ban the two together.

I hate those that snitch on non scamming old stuff but these scum have tried to punish and snitch on others themselves and one is a dangerous scammer so I'll take this as his final nail. Nullius is just a pathetic old perv so he is an easy target now anyway.

Truth is not trolling TPOTO

Your double standards prove you are a troll..

So any decisions made on this.?

The decision was already made by not making the decision. Having said that, I am not advocating that Lauda gets banned, nor do I wish that to happen. I am just pointing out that not making a decision, and not justifying it publicly, is a resolution of sorts.

A prime example of that is the 15 months Ban appeal by RegulusHr that I am sure you and many other have seen in Meta from time to time. Lauda and many others showed their support and asked for clarification many times...

NOT MAKING A DECISION IS A BIIIIIG DECISION
* (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUv8JJn_-q4)

I think Lauda deserves a pass here. When I joined this forum, not long ago, I quickly noticed Lauda was one of the kindest and helpful posters around.

Always very polite, always ready to help, I also saw she has a nice sense of humor. Most newbies I discussed with were very happy to receive Lauda's help, overall there seemed to be a consensus that Lauda was one of the pillars on this forum, and one of the reasons why bitcointalk became very popular over the years and a very successful community  :-*

Honestly Lauda should stay and is here to stay, one of the best posters I have ever seen since I first got Internet and seems to be a genuinely beautiful person.































Just kidding. Ban this shit fly.

lauda newer was kindest and helpful
you just another stupid ass licking asshole and all your story is fake

wat

Quoted for reference [1 (http://archive.is/mFQI7)]

See this post if you want to see what kind of a moron this guy is.

Seems like you didn't read my post in full  ;)

verry stupid quote from asshole like you))

To be fair sarcasm doesn't pass well across language barriers and kids these days can't be expected to read more than a couple of sentences at a time.

This Peloso chap is very interesting and so angry at Lauda and "gang" that his judgement is seriously clouded. He didn't even wait to read the whole post by Bossian before going on with his usual fire spitting escapades  ;D ;D

Wrong, probably lying underneath him.

I have just reviewed this thread about you and your obsession with sexual deviance. Yout clear obsession with child sex abuse may be condoned by the likes of Vod  but I find it revolting. You should certainly not be getting paid to post that filth on this forum.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.0

It appears to me that lauda is only supported by members with considerable dirt to be found in their own histories here.
If lauda is not given a very lengthy signature ban then it will serve only to demonstrate there are some clear double standards being imposed at an admin level. I see no reason not to ban members that have considerable and consistent events in their past that demonstrate the pose a clear and direct financial threat to other members.

Funny, I didn't see it that way at all but rather as a witty way of calling him a motherfucker.  You might be projecting those sexual obsessions from somewhere inside yourself--or you just might not have a sense of humor.  Or you're very pro-censorship. 

There aren't many angels to be found on bitcointalk, whether they support Lauda or not.  Guaranteed if we knew what other accounts you control, there's some dirt that could be dug up on you within a matter of minutes, so check yo self before you get all self righteous.

That may not be sexual deviance where you are from...
Reviewing the history of this member leads to some very nasty child sex abuse filth.
There is difference between an angel and a disgusting shit poster that is plastering child sex nastiness on this forum.
Are you suggesting that plagiarists and those spraying child sex abuse on this forum should be paid?
I notice you have a thread yourself that does not paint a very pretty picture. Perhaps those plastering the forum with racist hate speech are more in tune with those spewing child sex abuse and plagiarism.
I can see why some object to such members being sponsored to spread this dirt over the forum.

These are grounds for a signature ban as much as plagiarism.  
Being paid to post this type of thing is clearly not a good look for bitcointalk.
I dont find what lauda did as objectionable as lfcbitcoin's horrible nastiness. I'm sure a sponsor would not knowingly wish to pay for either.

Talking to cryptohunter's new alt isn't gonna be any different than talking to his 5 (???... lost count TBH) prior alts. I mean you're welcome to try but it's a waste of time.