I have just reviewed this thread about you and your obsession with sexual deviance. Yout clear obsession with child sex abuse may be condoned by the likes of Vod but I find it revolting.
Funny, I didn't see it that way at all but rather as a witty way of calling him a motherfucker. You might be projecting those sexual obsessions from somewhere inside yourself--or you just might not have a sense of humor. Or you're very pro-censorship.
It appears to me that lauda is only supported by members with considerable dirt to be found in their own histories here.
There aren't many angels to be found on bitcointalk, whether they support Lauda or not. Guaranteed if we knew what other accounts you control, there's some dirt that could be dug up on you within a matter of minutes, so check yo self before you get all self righteous.
That may not be sexual deviance where you are from...
Reviewing the history of this member leads to some very nasty child sex abuse filth.
There is difference between an angel and a disgusting shit poster that is plastering child sex nastiness on this forum.
Are you suggesting that plagiarists and those spraying child sex abuse on this forum should be paid?
I notice you have a thread yourself that does not paint a very pretty picture. Perhaps those plastering the forum with racist hate speech are more in tune with those spewing child sex abuse and plagiarism.
I can see why some object to such members being sponsored to spread this dirt over the forum.
These are grounds for a signature ban as much as plagiarism.
Being paid to post this type of thing is clearly not a good look for bitcointalk.
I dont find what lauda did as objectionable as lfcbitcoin's horrible nastiness. I'm sure a sponsor would not knowingly wish to pay for either.
