Bitcoin Forum

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

Do you have any trusted source for the accusation? You should provide a source for the information you share. If you are a customer you need to provide proof of the accusation.  
Kryptosino is offering amusing wager-free bonuses, which catches my eye. So I need a valid point for not involving with them. 

this is a big accusation against them. like Mahirap has said, any evidence or sources to back up this claim, especially the one regarding the investigation that will be opened by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force? it's my first time hearing about them so I don't know much about them but I did a quick search and can seem to find anything regarding the issue you are accusing them of.

Not a word that I found about it but there is one review about kryptosino.com found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262141.msg60516355#msg60516355

But it's not even a scam accusation. Not a word about them at all besides that. No Ann thread too. The review doesn't sound like it's bad. But how can this be big like it would affect sister casinos?

Lots of casinos to which bitcointalk members were exposed to them but not investigated by Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.

Lol. Really?

I understand that this happens in practically all licensed casinos in the Caribbean. They put some AML/KYC conditions in their ToS that they very rarely comply with because they know it would screw up their business.

At least that's what I've heard, although I have no way of checking if it's true, other than asking people who gamble and pass the supposed limits.

I tried to check some of the reviews about Kryptosino casino, I saw that there were various reviews posted about Kryptosino casino, even though the casino is relatively new, but I didn't find anything suspicious.

There are so many reviews that I saw and read, example: KRYPTOSINO CASINO REVIEW (https://cryptogamble.tips/casino/kryptosino/), That's what makes me a little confused.

For example:

And further.

Isn't the Caribbean Island, one of the countries, where the KYC system is not questioned by Kryptosino, I think if they don't Due Diligence especially in your case, I'm sure they suspect you as an illegal user.

However, if you still insist that you are right, they are wrong in terms of AML/KYC violations, maybe you can leave your complaint in the review, I'm sure they will respond to your complaint.

It's BTCGosu review, I informed @Efialtis about this... BTCGosu has a "Blacklisted Bitcoin Casinos" page: https://www.btcgosu.com/bitcoin-casino-blacklist/ (https://www.btcgosu.com/bitcoin-casino-blacklist/). but this casino is not on that list.

As I get it he is complaining that this casino is not enforcing KYC... I guess he is in the wrong place, most of us don't like KYC.

KYC and AML Due Diligence are completely separate.  KYC is expected by the Regulator which is now Curaçao Gaming Control Board.  But they would also be interested in any AML Breach.  I can't provide the evidence here as all evidence from the player's involved has been passed over to the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  The laws and regulations state that anyone depositing or wagering over $2500 must go through the Customer Due Diligence checks to make sure they are not laundering money.  The Casino is responsible for this and they were allowing customers to wager over $50,000 and not once has Due Diligence or KYC been performed.  Its extremely worrying that these kind of amounts are being wagered without requesting any documentation.  

When I raised this directly with Kryptosino they decided to ignore the correspondence.   This is why it has now been passed to CFATF.  I believe 2 weeks is enough time to defend yourself and not one single response from Kryptosino.

I will keep this thread upto date with any further developments

You guys really need to stop using gambling platforms that are less popular, they can decide to do anyhow with their customers, they also have less reputation, this mean they can decide to close down at any time that's why bigger gambling platforms are better and more reliable.

Any articles related to this issue? I am not really familiar with the gambling site but thanks for the heads up for letting us know about it though I am still unsure if its true or not and I still managed to access their site. If that's true then we should just avoid the site for our safety but as of now I am not sure if you are telling the truth or not so it's either true or you're spreading fud.

You can still access the site but it's an advanced warning as an investigation will be starting soon.  I don't want anyone depositing money and then suddenly can't access anything as they have had to close down the site due to an investigation. 
As soon as anymore updates come to light I will post it on this thread

Thank you for sharing information here but I hope once you already find an evidence, you should try following the scam accusation format and right board for it. I will keep in mind this gambling site to avoid as of now but I will be waiting for your follow up thread or updates about your accusation about this gambling site.

I don't see any logic in stop using less popular gambling platforms. Like you want to use those shitty popular platforms that continuously scam customers but grow massively just because they are massively popular for their marketing campaigns.

You are confusing two different words, popular and reputation. I will go for a new, fair, and well-reputed platform but not a popular platform.

Thank you very much for bringing such a vital information to this community, for me personally, I think you have done really well, how ever, I believe you have a source from which you get this information and also follow it up, would have really been a great idea if you shared the source, so that the community will know for sure that this is not just one of those baseless informations.
Alot of us like to verify informations as this ourselves, and also follow it up on our own without having to wait until you update the thread.
This is just my thought though, you can choose to do whatever pleases you, but all the same, thanks for the information again.

I've never seen this site. We'll of course take the warning into consideration, but I don't feel like this casino poses a big threat to the community with so many reputable ones advertising on this forum and Kryptosino not being one of them. People here have so many good sites to choose that it would be a miracle if a frequent bitcointalk user went to play there.

Keep us informed if you find anything to support the claim about the investigation.

Exactly and the more reason why I can not trust all those small casinos with my documents, is that one can not guarantee whether they're going to be used for identity theft scams since there don't have the security to protect those data.

Most of those casinos, just provide kyc just to get licensed after that whatever the player does is left on the check.

If you are going to play at a gambling site, you must bear in mind that you can provide documents to the gambling site at all times. Nowadays that seems standard, but it will probably also be included in the general terms and conditions. It looks like they have a gambling license from Curacao, where the requirements are also becoming stricter and I think that the site can do little about the fact that they come up with this procedure. All you can do is provide the required documents and then hope that your account is verified and that you get paid.

Never heard about this casino but if they really violated something, then it should be investigated. Are you one of the victim who experience some irregularities about this site?
Always choose the best site if you are going to gamble, remember that having peace of mind and security with the site should be your priority, if the site can’t deliver this then better not to play with them at all.

No I'm not a customer, I help people with issues regarding Casinos.  There are around 10 Customers who provided me with evidence which I have passed over to CFATF after Kryptosino ignored my correspondence. 

Since you mentioned that those people gave you evidences in regards to your claim here, why not include them to this thread? Accusation without evidence won't do anything, it will not help you with the case, thus, you need to provide proofs.
I haven't seen them to be here, but I hope they respond to this one after you share the evidences.

When it's something as serious as breaching AML Regulations I can't share any of the evidence on this thread.  It could impede the investigation as Kryptosino could see the evidence and try to get rid of any traces before the investigation has begun. 
All I want to do with this thread is warn people, and then provide further information on the investigation down the line.  I've throughly discussed this with CFATF and Kryptosino are definitely in the wrong. 

Less popular and new gambling sites needs our support too. Let's gave them a chance to grow so we shouldn't only focus on the old and popular casinos. They are already big so they will do just fine. New and less popular gambling sites might also have unique features and great games. That is one of the reasons on why we should try them.

Not all of them are scams but maybe they currently lack of budget, that is why they lack of promotions for the public to know them but posting their ann thread in the forum doesn't cost anything either. Posting here not only serves as a free advertisement but it will also help users here to gain confidence about them.

^Evidence still is a must here so that we can also conclude that you are telling us the truth.
However, you have reason enough to believe the possible consequences if you have shown here that evidence. This casino is not popular here do not worry, no one will use them because they are not advertising here. There are a lot of trusted casinos here that have already proven their legitimacy in this community which I think the reason the community will not use unknown gambling casinos. But, still, we are thankful for your warning.

Not a thing that I've heard of them but if you've got some proofs to be added, add it to the first post so everyone would have to see the context of the fact that you've shared.
But if you can't share it on this thread because it could be sensitive and you just really can't do then many won't be convinced by what you've said unless there are also other accusations on that casino.

Seeing as it's more like OP themselves did the application for all the legal stuff, I assume we ain't seeing any articles about this at least until whatever legal custody publishes their reports about it then? And OP is adamant about not sharing the evidence he found (and probably submitted) to us so I'd say we'd at most be getting more info about this by the end of the month.

As for the casino itself, I tried looking over their AML policies but I keep getting redirected to their error 404 page, if anyone can share if they also experience the same thing then I'd say there's something wrong on their side or they're changing it themselves. BTCGosu briefly described it though as
but seeing what op claims, I guess until I read it myself I can't say much about it.

Thanks for the warning mate but best if you will add some proofs or links towards your point because I don't even know this casino  , so by no choice that will play on this site.

but since they are not mentioned to be scammer then yes this is the place for them  but once you provided all your documents then yes you'll be fine accusing them.

would you mind update us for what will happen soon? and what is the status of the investigation?

   -  If what you are saying is some kind of accusation, you should have enough evidence at least to show it here dude, because if this is the only verbal topic on this forum platform, it will only appear that you are doing damage to a casino that is already there later you can be charged with a libel case.

You know in this day and age if there's no evidence it's just a rumor or you're just spreading a rumor. So right now it's hard to believe what you're saying because it's not credible so far.

Well, so far I have not found any current accusations or disputes regarding kryptosino, except for reviews on this online casino, so it's better to wait for what the OP is talking about and if this happens, then draw some conclusions based on the situation.

If the casino violates the rules set, hopefully there will be a regulator who will look into the abuse so that it won't worry its members.

And we thank you for your notification because it can make us alert to be able to stay away from casinos like that. And hopefully the casino doesn't enter the forum to keep all of us away from casinos that end up being scammed or giving results we don't want.

I guess you are right. I don't see any previous accusations about the website and the reviews are only few and we are not sure if they are legitimate. As of now there's a lot of good alternative gambling sites that we know is safe I don't think I would try this website or other site that doesn't have announcement thread here.

.Things are simple; if you doubt how a gambling casino operates, then you are free to leave and choose other platforms. There are many gambling sites in this industry. You may also look for land based casinos if you are really down to it. Almost every month, there is a gambling casino being introduced to players especially on online platform. You may also consider the huge names of this industry to lessen your worries; online casinos which have good reputation for sure won't be on such place without reasonable cause. Given that you have choices, you are free to explore. It is also free to ask for feedbacks such as with this topic but at the end of the day, you'll be the one to decide whether to stay on that casino or not.

I should not have said much about this but I will have to say something now. All these you have said is likely to be an accusation against the casino for which according to your findings, you have a first-hand information about but hear you only made mention of aml and kyc which is not real substantia. Do you have any real facts to back your claims? No link for further information as reported by who and when it was reported. Come to talk of it , this looks more or an announcement than what you really think should be posted hear on this board. However I hope you know that you are doing a great harm to a casino by making this post without much facts at hand to back up your claims. I will suggest you do your proper findings and furnish us with the evidence so we can be able to see the fact to your claims.

How do you know that they haven't done KYC for more than 10 users?
Are you by any chance all those 10 accounts?
Were you trying to multi account and got banned for it?
Is this a retaliation?

The casino has pretty good reviews. I know that some of those are probably paid, but they're usually rated at 4/5 by different sites, are licensed in Curacao and have a live support, so any issues can be directed there. If you have a problem with their KYC maybe ask support about it and let us know what the answer was.

And I don't think it means anything.  And what violates these damn AML and KYC, there is nothing so completely negative in this.  You all think that AML, KYC is a panacea, it is a guarantee of casino reliability.  And you never think about the fact that these are hyped advertising chips, brands invented by the damn American banking lobby in order to further restrict the movement of money and rob ordinary people, respectively, sticking the AML / KYC label to those organizations where you need to increase the flow of customers.

 They should all go to hell with their AML/KYC.!!!

If you ascribed irregularities to the unpopularity of a casino you may miss out on somethings and most of the unpopular casinos, have a law presence but with great features most especially those casinos that just started new.

I can mention a few unpopular casinos that still follow the rules and never treat their players with any form of disdain.

You are right for the information of bringing up it's evidence of accusation, because i have not seen a cogent point and any information that comes with evidence or source is the believable information, because sometimes some try to condemn other platforms by giving the them a tag name of accusation without proof, so for everyone to agree with this information of op let it attached it with the source so that it will be a clear evidence.

Still, OP failed to provide any proof or anything at all, he was not even a customer and he just accused based on other customers' opinions. Yes, you are right some people from other casinos try to harm their competition which is not a good strategy for taking down your competition. I still convince that OP has the proof of what he claims, and if he fails to provide any, we will report and move on. Mods can do the rest.

While it can be understood that sometimes it is not possible to share whatever evidence they may have in order to not compromise the ongoing investigation, at the same time if no evidence is produced at all then people cannot simply take the OP seriously on his word alone, I have never gambled at that casino but for the people that have it is not as if the opinion of OP is going to change their minds as there was not a single piece of evidence brought forward that could corroborate the claims of the OP.

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

It's not surprising anymore there's a business will want to take down the other business by spreading a fake information, it's not only happen on online casino.

 -  What casino name are you talking about mate? Are you one of its victims? You have not even posted here any source to make what you say credible.

It's hard to believe what you say, mate, maybe you are not aware that most of the community members here on this forum platform are knowledgeable in this industry.
But if there is, there are people who will support what you say anyway.

It bitters my heart anytime I see an accusation with prove on a casino or generally any business at all, this is because the accuser is tarnishing the name of a business and a possible means of living for another person.
I have talked about this time without number and I think any accusation without a prove should be deleted immediately as simple as that period.
Now back to the accusation, I'm not really familiar with this casino and I guess this is also one of the major reasons why you should have included a prove because I tried checking them out and also found that they have alot of eye catching offers and now I'm confused on wether to give them a try or not.
And the casinos in Caribbean have had such similar issues but I also think carribean is one place that doesn't have much emphasis on KYC.

In this case i have not seen what is relevant in this, but what i wanted you to understand is that, many can make a gesture and scandal of a particular thing they don't know about, when i checked the account who is accusing this platform , it's a new account account, and assuming it's a sincere one it would have use the main account to justify this platform, i believe the claims can be accepted and comprehendable when the op provide an evidence, because almost everyone in the platform can not agree with op unless theirs a sincere evidence that is attached to it.

providing proofs will serve as complete reason for us to believe in what you are saying here , imagine that you are mentioning a casino name with this accusation but all are based on your own words?

mate the casino name is written in the title , have not you check it first?

That is just the way some people manage themselves on the internet, while I am in favor of preserving our privacy while we are online, I am also against people abusing that same privacy to say or even do things that they will never dream to do if their identities were linked to their accounts, so while it is not possible to know if the accusations that were posted by the OP are true as they refused to post any evidence about it, it is still a good idea to avoid casinos which do not have an ANN thread here.

Without proves this thread is about nothing. I`m not registered in this casino and don`t plan to do it, but the OP must tell us smth if he wants us to believe him. We often see here cries that some casino is scam without proves. Most time it means that someone lost or tried to cheat but was catched.

Well, OP has no proof of what he accuses the casino of. I know that scam isn't moderated in this forum and from my little research of that casino I didn't find anything that OP is referring to. If scam is moderated in this forum OP has no proof that they are scamming and this might get OP some negative feedback.

OP just created this account to post this topic and claims he is working on behalf of scammed customers from this casino. So he just working on customers scammed in this website not other casino sites? The thing is, he is someone who wants the downfall of this casino out of some personal issue or he is from their competitors.

This days, no one take empty accusation seriously in here and ops are just wasting his time by posting the statement and taking it to be a valid accusation. There are ways things are done in here and ops have not followed the proper forum guidelines to report scams, but in all, we have to be careful because the point up raised is a serious one, KYC facility is a security aspect and any casino who does not follow the proper AML/KYC processes may expose your data and documents to hackers since there don't take security seriously.

If he wants to prove something then he should have provided concrete evidence to support his claims and accusations. If he isn't able to show any proof, then he might only be dragging down the casino for his own motive which is unfair. We can't deny the fact that there are really people who will accuse casinos for their own reasons so it is still important that as we read allegations and accusations, we should still do our own research.

It's easy to accuse the truth, but it's hard to prove it when looking for evidence, especially when we know ourselves that what we're accusing is not true, but if there is strong evidence, of course, it's easy to prove it It's just that simple, right?

But as you said, what OP is saying is not credible and trustworthy, because whatever his reason for such accusations, he will be the bad guy in the end.

The problem we are having in the accusations threads is the absent of the said accused links. Now probably this is the casino "Kryptosino" the OP is referring to. Now the best way to do this he would have link the site or if possible provide the link here so that anyone who sees the link would be easier for him or her to click and see the casino site but as it is. The OP argue bind accusation that has no evidence. Reporting such casino with their evil deeds is good but how do we know that this is legit.

If the casino that we are talking about here is unpopular then there are people who will now distance themselves on that casino. This is why what the op is doing there is wrong because what if those casinos are really legit and only tries their best to become the next big thing in the gambling industry? But, that will now be hard because there is someone in the background who is trying to destroy their reputation.

It can be the Op's fault on why he experience some issues. I know casinos can made their own mistakes as well because nothing in this world perfect but it should be fixed out as soon as possible before the issue gets bigger.

The OP's statement must be based on the truth or things that actually happened.
What's more, the statement is aimed at a person's or individual's place of business.
Because creating false or fud rumors can be bad for reputation and defamation.
In this forum, many also explain that every user when giving a statement must be completely original, not just a mere review.
Anyone can even be subject to severe sanctions for false statements.

So meaning that your involvement here is purely to help people? you are not even connected or playing in this site? so why are you posting here with newbie account? sorry to ask but are you trying to ask for bribe from this site as you are making noise against them when you aren't even a victim and never experience their site?
sorry for the question but this seems to be Odd to look at.

But they post again and again, so sometimes there too much such statement and someone can believe it.
Anyway i don`t think that it is a good idea to make KYC in small casino with small auditory and deposit. There are big casinos with history and reputation, they have qualified specialists and can guarantee security of your private data.

Looks like some weird disguised ad to me. Like negative publicity still publicity sort of stuff. How much do they pay you? I mean, no reference, no link, how can you prove it actually happened?  :o

So this is definitely a bad idea.

I mean - the introduction of KYC in a small casino, unknown to a wide audience of online gambling players. This damn KYC will only reduce the number of people who want to even go to your site at all, let alone play on it. Why spoil your already modest business in such a way, pandering to these bankers who came up with their own damn KYC just to make it easier for them to take money, or property  from those who seriously lost. No fight against KYC scammers helps, it's all lies. And just by introducing it in cryptocurrency transactions, they ruined an excellent idea and technology of anonymous payments.
And now the banking guys are brazenly brazenly climbing into the cryptocurrency industry everywhere with their damn KYC / AML

This is the casino https://www.kryptosino.com/ because I don't find any other casino that has a word of "kryptosino".

The @OP is inactive for 2 weeks until now, so we can't see the evidence of this accusations. The best thing we could do is avoid this casino, there's many legit casino that we can gamble and have an official representative in this forum. So when we face a problem, we can easily ask them in this forum.

It is a long discussion without one true answer. KYC shows to the gamblers that casino tries their best to become more safe. In this way they can attract new gamblers. But the same time if they include KYC, they don`t need cryptocurrencies - they can just get fiat money. I don`t hate KYC, but i don`t think that we need KYC when we are talking about cryptocurrencies and casinos.

Whatever the casino, I doubt if @OP will come back to the thread again and provide more evidence, especially since he has been inactive for 2 weeks. And if it's true that the casino you mentioned is the casino, I've never heard of it before and I don't think the casino has any representation in this forum either. We don't need to bother looking for casinos from out there because this forum already has many casinos that we can use to gamble.

And this is a lesson for us, never choose a casino from out there that we don't know its reputation. We also want to avoid getting into trouble like @OP's.

Supposedly he has evidence but he does not wants to share it, which begs the question about why open the thread at all? As we are not going to believe such story without the evidence which demonstrates that what they are saying is in fact the truth, so maybe the OP does not understand how this forum works or as some other users have suggested it is possible this was a veiled attempt to create publicity for the casino as some see bad publicity as good publicity anyway.

so now what happened to your helping status? does the casino replied and complied to your case against them?

and what about going back here to at least tell us what is the status because you clearly mentioned not being a costumer so maybe there is something serious about this problem and this casino?

this is why he left the forum  ;D because he cannot even answer those typical questions .

Probably, sometimes it happens that someone who is not very familiar with the possible, of course, many years old traditions of our forum, comes here, opens a new topic.  And what he manages when he deals with cancer, we can only guess. 

Really bad advertising is also advertising, because the casino or other site still gets stuck in your memory.  And then after a while you don’t even remember at all whether it was a bad project or a good one.  This is how negative advertising works. 

What did OP really want?  Maybe explain. 
What's the point in counting? 
And it doesn't make any sense! :)

We can't find the accusation valid if the proof is not been provided by accuser so its hard to figure out if he' telling a truth or not. Much better for any people who want to voice out what they know or experience on certain casino reputable or not much better if they show some proof so that there's no doubt will came from the people who read the message and they get the sympathy of user who can read his claims.

Hi @Masterpaindj, could you change your account status if possible so 'newbies' can message you? I am a journalist and would be interested in talking to you about this. Thanks, James