Kryptosino Avoid!!!

[Masterpaindj]

<snip>
No I'm not a customer, I help people with issues regarding Casinos.  There are around 10 Customers who provided me with evidence which I have passed over to CFATF after Kryptosino ignored my correspondence.  

Since you mentioned that those people gave you evidences in regards to your claim here, why not include them to this thread? Accusation without evidence won't do anything, it will not help you with the case, thus, you need to provide proofs.
I haven't seen them to be here, but I hope they respond to this one after you share the evidences.

When it's something as serious as breaching AML Regulations I can't share any of the evidence on this thread.  It could impede the investigation as Kryptosino could see the evidence and try to get rid of any traces before the investigation has begun. 
All I want to do with this thread is warn people, and then provide further information on the investigation down the line.  I've throughly discussed this with CFATF and Kryptosino are definitely in the wrong. 

[dezoel]

You guys really need to stop using gambling platforms that are less popular, they can decide to do anyhow with their customers, they also have less reputation, this mean they can decide to close down at any time that's why bigger gambling platforms are better and more reliable.

I don't see any logic in stop using less popular gambling platforms. Like you want to use those shitty popular platforms that continuously scam customers but grow massively just because they are massively popular for their marketing campaigns.

You are confusing two different words, popular and reputation. I will go for a new, fair, and well-reputed platform but not a popular platform.

Less popular and new gambling sites needs our support too. Let's gave them a chance to grow so we shouldn't only focus on the old and popular casinos. They are already big so they will do just fine. New and less popular gambling sites might also have unique features and great games. That is one of the reasons on why we should try them.

Not all of them are scams but maybe they currently lack of budget, that is why they lack of promotions for the public to know them but posting their ann thread in the forum doesn't cost anything either. Posting here not only serves as a free advertisement but it will also help users here to gain confidence about them.

[DoublerHunter]

<snip>
No I'm not a customer, I help people with issues regarding Casinos.  There are around 10 Customers who provided me with evidence which I have passed over to CFATF after Kryptosino ignored my correspondence.  

Since you mentioned that those people gave you evidences in regards to your claim here, why not include them to this thread? Accusation without evidence won't do anything, it will not help you with the case, thus, you need to provide proofs.
I haven't seen them to be here, but I hope they respond to this one after you share the evidences.

When it's something as serious as breaching AML Regulations I can't share any of the evidence on this thread.  It could impede the investigation as Kryptosino could see the evidence and try to get rid of any traces before the investigation has begun. 
All I want to do with this thread is warn people, and then provide further information on the investigation down the line.  I've throughly discussed this with CFATF and Kryptosino are definitely in the wrong. 

^Evidence still is a must here so that we can also conclude that you are telling us the truth.
However, you have reason enough to believe the possible consequences if you have shown here that evidence. This casino is not popular here do not worry, no one will use them because they are not advertising here. There are a lot of trusted casinos here that have already proven their legitimacy in this community which I think the reason the community will not use unknown gambling casinos. But, still, we are thankful for your warning.

[passwordnow]

Not a thing that I've heard of them but if you've got some proofs to be added, add it to the first post so everyone would have to see the context of the fact that you've shared.
But if you can't share it on this thread because it could be sensitive and you just really can't do then many won't be convinced by what you've said unless there are also other accusations on that casino.

[Wexnident]

Seeing as it's more like OP themselves did the application for all the legal stuff, I assume we ain't seeing any articles about this at least until whatever legal custody publishes their reports about it then? And OP is adamant about not sharing the evidence he found (and probably submitted) to us so I'd say we'd at most be getting more info about this by the end of the month.

As for the casino itself, I tried looking over their AML policies but I keep getting redirected to their error 404 page, if anyone can share if they also experience the same thing then I'd say there's something wrong on their side or they're changing it themselves. BTCGosu briefly described it though as

The AML policy here is extensive, and the privacy one is decent.

but seeing what op claims, I guess until I read it myself I can't say much about it.

[kotajikikox]

You can still access the site but it's an advanced warning as an investigation will be starting soon.  I don't want anyone depositing money and then suddenly can't access anything as they have had to close down the site due to an investigation. 
As soon as anymore updates come to light I will post it on this thread

Thanks for the warning mate but best if you will add some proofs or links towards your point because I don't even know this casino  , so by no choice that will play on this site.

but since they are not mentioned to be scammer then yes this is the place for them  but once you provided all your documents then yes you'll be fine accusing them.

would you mind update us for what will happen soon? and what is the status of the investigation?

[Mr. Magkaisa]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

   -  If what you are saying is some kind of accusation, you should have enough evidence at least to show it here dude, because if this is the only verbal topic on this forum platform, it will only appear that you are doing damage to a casino that is already there later you can be charged with a libel case.

You know in this day and age if there's no evidence it's just a rumor or you're just spreading a rumor. So right now it's hard to believe what you're saying because it's not credible so far.

[Daltonik]

Well, so far I have not found any current accusations or disputes regarding kryptosino, except for reviews on this online casino, so it's better to wait for what the OP is talking about and if this happens, then draw some conclusions based on the situation.

[ethereumhunter]

If the casino violates the rules set, hopefully there will be a regulator who will look into the abuse so that it won't worry its members.

And we thank you for your notification because it can make us alert to be able to stay away from casinos like that. And hopefully the casino doesn't enter the forum to keep all of us away from casinos that end up being scammed or giving results we don't want.

[qory]

Well, so far I have not found any current accusations or disputes regarding kryptosino, except for reviews on this online casino, so it's better to wait for what the OP is talking about and if this happens, then draw some conclusions based on the situation.

I guess you are right. I don't see any previous accusations about the website and the reviews are only few and we are not sure if they are legitimate. As of now there's a lot of good alternative gambling sites that we know is safe I don't think I would try this website or other site that doesn't have announcement thread here.

[Yatsan]

Well, so far I have not found any current accusations or disputes regarding kryptosino, except for reviews on this online casino, so it's better to wait for what the OP is talking about and if this happens, then draw some conclusions based on the situation.

I guess you are right. I don't see any previous accusations about the website and the reviews are only few and we are not sure if they are legitimate. As of now there's a lot of good alternative gambling sites that we know is safe I don't think I would try this website or other site that doesn't have announcement thread here.

.Things are simple; if you doubt how a gambling casino operates, then you are free to leave and choose other platforms. There are many gambling sites in this industry. You may also look for land based casinos if you are really down to it. Almost every month, there is a gambling casino being introduced to players especially on online platform. You may also consider the huge names of this industry to lessen your worries; online casinos which have good reputation for sure won't be on such place without reasonable cause. Given that you have choices, you are free to explore. It is also free to ask for feedbacks such as with this topic but at the end of the day, you'll be the one to decide whether to stay on that casino or not.

[CryptSafe]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

I should not have said much about this but I will have to say something now. All these you have said is likely to be an accusation against the casino for which according to your findings, you have a first-hand information about but hear you only made mention of aml and kyc which is not real substantia. Do you have any real facts to back your claims? No link for further information as reported by who and when it was reported. Come to talk of it , this looks more or an announcement than what you really think should be posted hear on this board. However I hope you know that you are doing a great harm to a casino by making this post without much facts at hand to back up your claims. I will suggest you do your proper findings and furnish us with the evidence so we can be able to see the fact to your claims.

[pixie85]

How do you know that they haven't done KYC for more than 10 users?
Are you by any chance all those 10 accounts?
Were you trying to multi account and got banned for it?
Is this a retaliation?

The casino has pretty good reviews. I know that some of those are probably paid, but they're usually rated at 4/5 by different sites, are licensed in Curacao and have a live support, so any issues can be directed there. If you have a problem with their KYC maybe ask support about it and let us know what the answer was.

[delfastTions]

This Casino is knowingly breaching AML Regulations by not performing Customer Due Diligence checks.  The limit for checks to be performed on wagering match that of the KYC limit which is around $2500.  Neither are being performed with over 10 customers and god knows how many more.  An investigation will be opening soon with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force.  If the Curaçao Gaming Control  Board get a whiff of this then bye bye Licence and sister Casinos.

Thank you for sharing this valuable information with us. So we can avoid facing any issues such as financial loss.
I request you post this in a scam accusation, so this information can also become more valuable for other users.

And I don't think it means anything.  And what violates these damn AML and KYC, there is nothing so completely negative in this.  You all think that AML, KYC is a panacea, it is a guarantee of casino reliability.  And you never think about the fact that these are hyped advertising chips, brands invented by the damn American banking lobby in order to further restrict the movement of money and rob ordinary people, respectively, sticking the AML / KYC label to those organizations where you need to increase the flow of customers.

 They should all go to hell with their AML/KYC.!!!

[Piesel]

You guys really need to stop using gambling platforms that are less popular, they can decide to do anyhow with their customers, they also have less reputation, which means they can decide to close down at any time that's why bigger gambling platforms are better and more reliable.

If you ascribed irregularities to the unpopularity of a casino you may miss out on somethings and most of the unpopular casinos, have a law presence but with great features most especially those casinos that just started new.

I can mention a few unpopular casinos that still follow the rules and never treat their players with any form of disdain.

[minime0105]

Do you have any trusted source for the accusation? You should provide a source for the information you share. If you are a customer you need to provide proof of the accusation.  
Kryptosino is offering amusing wager-free bonuses, which catches my eye. So I need a valid point for not involving with them. 

You are right for the information of bringing up it's evidence of accusation, because i have not seen a cogent point and any information that comes with evidence or source is the believable information, because sometimes some try to condemn other platforms by giving the them a tag name of accusation without proof, so for everyone to agree with this information of op let it attached it with the source so that it will be a clear evidence.

[drwhobox]

Do you have any trusted source for the accusation? You should provide a source for the information you share. If you are a customer you need to provide proof of the accusation.  
Kryptosino is offering amusing wager-free bonuses, which catches my eye. So I need a valid point for not involving with them. 

You are right for the information of bringing up it's evidence of accusation, because i have not seen a cogent point and any information that comes with evidence or source is the believable information, because sometimes some try to condemn other platforms by giving the them a tag name of accusation without proof, so for everyone to agree with this information of op let it attached it with the source so that it will be a clear evidence.

Still, OP failed to provide any proof or anything at all, he was not even a customer and he just accused based on other customers' opinions. Yes, you are right some people from other casinos try to harm their competition which is not a good strategy for taking down your competition. I still convince that OP has the proof of what he claims, and if he fails to provide any, we will report and move on. Mods can do the rest.

[Silberman]

Do you have any trusted source for the accusation? You should provide a source for the information you share. If you are a customer you need to provide proof of the accusation.  
Kryptosino is offering amusing wager-free bonuses, which catches my eye. So I need a valid point for not involving with them. 

You are right for the information of bringing up it's evidence of accusation, because i have not seen a cogent point and any information that comes with evidence or source is the believable information, because sometimes some try to condemn other platforms by giving the them a tag name of accusation without proof, so for everyone to agree with this information of op let it attached it with the source so that it will be a clear evidence.

Still, OP failed to provide any proof or anything at all, he was not even a customer and he just accused based on other customers' opinions. Yes, you are right some people from other casinos try to harm their competition which is not a good strategy for taking down your competition. I still convince that OP has the proof of what he claims, and if he fails to provide any, we will report and move on. Mods can do the rest.

While it can be understood that sometimes it is not possible to share whatever evidence they may have in order to not compromise the ongoing investigation, at the same time if no evidence is produced at all then people cannot simply take the OP seriously on his word alone, I have never gambled at that casino but for the people that have it is not as if the opinion of OP is going to change their minds as there was not a single piece of evidence brought forward that could corroborate the claims of the OP.

[Solosanz]

Still, OP failed to provide any proof or anything at all, he was not even a customer and he just accused based on other customers' opinions. Yes, you are right some people from other casinos try to harm their competition which is not a good strategy for taking down your competition. I still convince that OP has the proof of what he claims, and if he fails to provide any, we will report and move on. Mods can do the rest.

What's the reason you want to report @OP? what's rule that the @OP broke in this forum? you need to know scam isn't moderated in this forum, so moderators wouldn't take care with such reports. Also @OP hasn't logged for 7 days, I don't expect he will back and give a full evidence about this accusation.

It's not surprising anymore there's a business will want to take down the other business by spreading a fake information, it's not only happen on online casino.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

 -  What casino name are you talking about mate? Are you one of its victims? You have not even posted here any source to make what you say credible.

It's hard to believe what you say, mate, maybe you are not aware that most of the community members here on this forum platform are knowledgeable in this industry.
But if there is, there are people who will support what you say anyway.