Bitcoin Forum

I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer, which is trying to fool people that he can offer money laundering check. I am not sure if he managed to scam anyone so far, but what is certain that he follows all patterns of a scammer.

What happened: the scammer alleges that he has thousands of BTC, ETH and TRX addresses addresses which are marked for being used in illegal activities / unusual behavior. He asks money for checking if client's (BTC / ETH / TRX) funds were used in illegal activities.

Scammer's Profile Link: saxydev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410716)

Reference Link: Anti money laundering service checks (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5403595)
Amount Scammed: unknown.
Payment Method: the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight.
Proof of Payment: N/A so far.
PM/Chat Logs: N/A.

Additional Notes: saxydev appeared recently (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61592784#msg61592784) inside Romanian board, starting to say various ridiculous things inside the translated topic of 1miau's Why people should be using SegWit addresses (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5355829). OP declared himself against SegWit, signaling that it has all sort of problems, but without specifying anything. He tried to act smart, like talking in riddles but, in fact, it was clear that he is a mere illiterate underclassman, probably barely able to spell his name. Although I, NeuroticFish and also PrivacyG tried to reason with him, explaining that, if you have something to say, make sure you say it clearly, he did not act accordingly at all.

Later he joined another Romanian topic, defending the imbecility called Pi Network (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435710.msg61629683#msg61629683). He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile, andulolika (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=223200), which, among ban evasion and making death threats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059) on the forum was also trying to scam forum users through various schemes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116) (you can check the feedback I left him).

Make sure you read OP's Trust feedbacks -- saxydev sells "input analysis", which besides being fundamentally pointless, is against Bitcoin, as he treats the currency as non-fungible. I don't say he's a liar or a scammer; just a neutral warning of what kind of person you're about to be dealing with. (from BlackHatCoiner)

Excepting all of the above, I wrote this warning inside his thread, but my post was quickly deleted. Most likely, saxydev created his service topic with self-moderation to be able to delete any post incriminating him. My deleted post can be seen below.

---

---

Although I have no clear evidence that he is a scammer, all these hints suggest me that it's better to avoid OP. If you are interested in dealing with him, approach him with very high caution!. Be it andulolika's alt or not, saxydev seems to run enough shenanigans for being safe to avoid him.

---

---

---

Update (Jan 27th, 2023): the scammer exposed himself as being a scammer within this thread, after scamming user dkbit98 with 0.1 BTC representing a deal not honored by saxydev. As a consequence, I also updated topic title from "Be careful with saxydev; he is a possible scammer" to "Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer".

What happened: dkbit98 made him the offer to prove that saxydev is selling a service which is free for the Internet; the offer was to have dkbit98 post such a website and, in case he will do it, to have saxydev pay him 0.1 BTC; saxydev denied that such thing exists and accepted the deal, after trying twice to cancel it unilateral.

Scammer's Profile Link: saxydev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410716)

Reference Link: Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.0)
Amount Scammed: 0.1 BTC
Payment Method: BTC
Proof of Payment: N/A so far.
PM/Chat Logs: the agreement was sealed at post #20 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61644195#msg61644195) of this thread.

First, you are an idiot seeking attention when someone disagrees with him.

I was not against segwit as technology, I am against the compromises arround implementing segwit.
I did not defend PI, I just stated facts, they are traded and they have a blockchain, even said in my post that they are ponzi/pyramidal system.
And you are the second after JollyJohnyBeGood who called me an alt of someone, from alt of eliale, now I am alt of andouluka. Well mr. NewsletterBitcoin fuck off.
Giving a feedback as opinion instead of actually doing a trade, means you have some mental frustration, probably momi issues

You are not incriminating me, you just don't know what you are talking about lol

Edit 1:

About pi:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435710.msg61630339#msg61630339
Translation using google cause I am lazy:


Edit2:
About segwit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61600878#msg61600878


----

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.

Same happened with the case of JollyJonnyBeGood: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg61200521#msg61200521

When you are against some popular opinions you are the mf'er. Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin fuck off

 Self-topic is usually created to remove spam posts. And another reason can be for any type of contradictory post. Based on the screenshot you have provided I could not see any type of spamming. So, the post is contradictory to his/her post. And contradictory posts should be deleted by those who are scammers or likely to be a scammer.

I had to unignore you to quote your post ;( ! A sad moment for me!

He's post is a spam. Accusing me in my thread of being the alt of someone else and saying that anti money laundering checks are scammy/illegal or dangerous is a SPAM.

He did not made a constructive post to my thread and more I can delete any post in a self-moderated thread.

Also he insulted me, so it's my right to delete his post.

Unfortunately NewsletterBitcoin dissapointed me ;(

So the scammer strikes back. I expected that.


Thank you. Your statement reflects your high level of education.


In multiple occasions I, NeuroticFish and PrivacyG asked you what specific issues you are talking about. You never replied. Reference: [1] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61592899#msg61592899), [2] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61603810#msg61603810), [3] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61600631#msg61600631), [4] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61595183#msg61595183).


I said that you may be but, most likely, your poor English skills prevent you from understanding the difference between "is" and "may be".


Thanks again. Again, a high lever of education and moral standards.


Probably you don't know how to properly use Trust feedback. If you look at the description of Neutral feedback you'll see: "Other comments".

https://loyce.club/other/trust/newfeedback.png

This is exactly what my feedback is. For more information you can alsu use LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191802.0).


I am not incriminating you yet. For the moment I am just raising alarm signals about you.


No, you used Google because you don't know English. Sadly, you also don't know Romanian.


Be my guest.


If JollyGood has more information about the way you are trying to scam people, I am kindly inviting him here. I feel though that saxydev will be walking on very thin ice if JollyGood will come here.

---

Obviously. Needless to say, AML checks are allowed only to institutions authorized by authorities. Nobody would authorize an underclassman for performing AML check. My warning to other users is this in fact: as long as someone is illiterate enough to not be able even to spell his name, be very cautious. If the person is an imbecile then certainly a deal can go bad, as he does not understand what he's doing. If he knows what he's doing then his very low intellect may lead to other problems. If he's just an underclassman but agile in shenanigans, then most likely he'll try to scam you.

---

Oh no! Almost crying here. I'm sure shasan feels the same.


Probably you wanted to type "his post" instead of "he's post". Then again: when you are an illiterate is difficult even to spell correctly "a-ha".


AML checks are illegal, as long as they are not authorized by the govern. AML checks are not scammy but you are scammy. Last, but not least, AML checks are not dangerous; dealing with you is dangerous.


For other users the post was constructive. Same as this topic is.


What is the insult?


Now I'm really crying.

Fuck off, you are just an idiot dear NewsletterBitcoin.


AML checks are illegal? Ok. I'm out of this thread, ignoring your replies from now on.

Don't hide under may or not may be/semantics. That's bs. You may be the killer of the age of reason.

I have just read this statement. What an idiot. Do not like NewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin
Where the fuck else to deal idiot if not through pm's or discord lol. relay chat?

btw in my aml thread:
2 left.

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.
This guy is probably using this free tools and he is charging people this ''service'' that can be done for free, and he is just trying to earn from this.
It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

There is 0 service that asks for in depth analyse for free. If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

Also just for aml score, very few do it for free, and from those, very few gather their own information. I know lots of people from this domain and those for free or that offer a trial, 95% are scams or inacurate.

Read again, I was not supporting Pi network, I was just stating facts. They have an exchange where to buy and sell crypto (huobi), they have main-net etc.

And about their request of KYC, I know what means privacy and I am against useless kyc in crypto world, but they are not the first to require it. And I saw most of the old members when other coins requested it, people to recommend it.

And again the shit pi network is one of the most used crypto out there, there are more pi in personal wallets as worldwide than btc's at the moment, even if it's shit and it is testnet. Pi has 50 mil downloads only on google play and Mycelium only 1 million, Metamask 10 mil only. Versus other scams, they did not ask yet for money from people. I do not praise Pi, but these are facts.

That's correct, hence no red tag yet from DT, although many have got red tag much easier, also without scamming anybody, but with more obvious attempts to scam.
Still, a bit of awareness is imho okay; his actions are (at least somewhat) shady (from the self moderated topic and removing that post to the laughable retaliatory trust feedbacks, also not forgetting about asking money for probably free service).

Congrats for confirming again your high moral standards and your good level of education!

Just a side note here, if I am allowed: "Gazeta" means "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". It's just a small difference, like the one between "duke" and "douche". But again, don't worry too much about it. Your main problem is not the poor knowledge of English. What's really embarrassing is the fact that you don't know even your own language.


Yes, they are. If you are not sure, feel free to go to ANAF headquarters (ANAF is the Romanian IRS) and let those inspectors know that you are doing their job. I believe they'll be happy to hear it.


Oh, no!


I may be; yet I am not.


Nobody forces you to like GazetaBitcoin.


Skipping the poor usage of English for arranging the words inside the sentence, to answer to your question I'd say to be transparent and make the deals inside your topic.


I am not sure you know the difference between "vouch" and "voucher". According to WikiDiff (https://wikidiff.com/vouch/voucher),


(I highlighted for you the part which is for your interest, as I am sure that otherwise you would have missed it.)

---

This is even a greater signal for being a scammer: selling something that's free?! Oo


Similar, I also did not say that he is a scammer. I said that he may be and, by outlining some of his actions, I wanted to make people aware of who they may be dealing with.

---

Is that the analysis pointed by BlackHatCoiner at your Trust page?


BlackHatCoiner's last sentence is close to what I said. However, about your precious analysis (although I have my doubts about the outcome of an analysis made by an imbecile), I am sure that dkbit98 will feel very flattered.


And you are among those 95%, right?


They do?


Really?


Can you name some?


I beg your pardon?


It is testnet or mainnet? Now I'm confused. You say here they use testnet, but a few lines up you said they have mainnet. Make your decision, will you?


You are an imbecile and this is another fact.

---

And the retaliatory feedback brought him another feedback from me. Still, a neutral one. But he's getting close to get a negative one. Each post he makes he's one step closer :)

I don't care about your lifetime BTC/ETH analyse, whatever that is, fact is that you are 100% using some third party tool, and I could prove it easily but I don't want to waste time on that.
Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

Excepting saxydev's precious piece of shit analysis analyse, another argument for the possibility of him being a scammer can be found by browsing his topics. His topics, not his posts! And, by looking at the topics he started, we can see names as:

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...
Looking for information about ransom attacks
Looking for a paper -- here he was looking for a paper (?!) -- "I am looking for this paper: Discerning payment patterns in Bitcoin from ransomware attacks"
Interested in finding the real owner of a btc address - 40$ XMR -- "Please don't make it public, sensitive matter (not personal)."
Looking for hacks on the TRX network, stolen funds on TRON

And the list goes on. Furthermore, inside each topic he offered a shitty amount of money (5$ - 10$) for those giving him good information. For me, it seems like saxydevs tries to learn as much as he can from previous scams and then try to repeat them.

Maybe the topic which shows the most his scammy character is this: Maybe some hacks should not be illegal (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412041.0).


Seriously? What honest person would ask this?

Besides, one reply says things bluntly:


What else can be thought about someone asking such questions?

---

dkbit98, for the sake of the argument, if you manage to find some free time, give this moron some examples, to prove him that he is both a liar and an imbecile.

When you do research about a subject you need information, aml on blockchain is all about information. The information must be updated daily and most of the topics.


- banks - thanks thanks, it was an ok ammount from my perspective

-ransom attacks - from conti to lazarus, most of the lately ransomware do not come with a public key posted in the ransomware note.
You need this information in order to find ransomware attacks or when ransom money are being laundered, who is laundering, from where is the source of funds or if the ransomware was paid. Most of the organisations always pay but they deny paying it.
I recommend bleepingcomputer as forum for this or https://www.vx-underground.org/ or my favourite https://id-ransomware.blogspot.com/ .

-the paper - if you will try to read from time to time, you will see why it is important to learn more about certain topics. Read the paper, great read!.

-real owner - when there is a hack or a scam, people are looking for details about who own's the address. NewsletterBitcoin is not the owner (I found out who he was).

-stolen funds on trx - there is not much information about trx just available online, even tho 42% of usdt blackmail attacks are paid through trc20. But of course, NewsletterBitcoin is new to this, he needs to find out about usdt first.

The discussion about keys is fun, not your keys, not your coins. If I have your key, are these my coins? That's interesting enough to debate, happened recently on this forum with yogg. Were those his coins if he had the keys? People will decide, not me.

For me NewsletterBitcoin is bored and he wants reach his weekly post requirment for the signature campaign.

I thought you were going to leave the forum...


And I also thought you were ignoring me...


Now I'm confused. Have you lied, perhaps? Same as you do inside your topics, in order to cheat people?

---

There, I corrected the sentence for you. Thank me later.



Obviously, I never tried to scam anyone. Of course I am new to this. However, I have experience in finding scammers. Besides, I think I told you once (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61637863#msg61637863), "Gazeta" is translated in English as "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". Perhaps you'll learn now.


Oooooo-ho-ho-ho! I laughed. It's sooo funny to steal someone's money, isn't it? Veeery, very funny!


No, they are not yours.


I believe that Police will decide, not people. Same as it'll happen with you too, sooner or later.


Precisely! This must be also why I exposed the other two Romanian illiterate scammers -- andulolika (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059) and bekli23 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237001.msg54455865#msg54455865).

Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin, I wanted to avoid you. But when you have someone that looks through your posts and find the most ridiculous accusations to bring against you, just can't ignore/giving you this privilege.

Perhaps Gazeta means Newspaper in romanian, but you are acting like a stressing newsletter on which you click unsubscribe, but you still get those emails.

I can't follow your story telling exposing nor understand why is there a need to quote every part of a reply and just reply out of context to parts of a message.


The moment when you quote someone and you modify the message shows what kind of person you are. No matter what's the topic. You can't quote and edit the quote. You just can't.

So far you have offended me, blamed me, accused me and even modified the quotes of my messages. Get a life lol

By calling you an idiot, I am offending the idiots. I am sorry for that

This is how scammers are exposed here. Or, in part, this is how it's done -- by checking post history. And by checking any online activity which may lead to evidence. Simply, this is how it's done.


This is because you have no education, you are an underclassman and you did not even learn some ethics about posting. In order for a post to be clearly understood it's recommended to quote relevant parts from the earlier post(s).


I was being sarcastic. This is why I also left your original words, but with strikethrough font. To be clear that I am not trying to change your words, but to ridicule you. Sadly for you, your very low intellect does not help you understand such subtle things, nor a subtle sarcasm. But it's okay, nature needs both wise and idiots.


Guess what? I just did it O0


I asked you above, but you never replied:



What was I supposed to do? Congratulate you for trying to scam people?


I did not accuse you yet. I'm just collecting evidence at the moment.


I do have a life. And I have a happy life. Also, a honest life. Can you sleep well during the night, thinking at the people you scammed or you tried to scam?


If imbecility would hurt, you'd probably be in pain and yell day and night. Fortunately for you, it doesn't hurt.

Ya sure good luck with that NewsletterBitcoin lol

enjoy your happy life lol

Just because you can't find something that doesn't mean this thing doesn't exist, except maybe in your mind.
I said that I can prove such services exist already, I know two who are totally free and others who are paid, unlike your imaginary service that nobody ever saw, because you don't have website or anything else.
Let me make you an offer, if I post a proof for a free service like I said you will pay me 0.1 BTC, I think this is fair offer for a guy who is so active businessman like you.

Edit:
Deal. Let's see

Neah, you know what. You are a legendary member and it will very easy to proof your own words/statements.

There is none and there will never be a free service, it will make no sense to let it be free. Only mainting it daily as cost is that high, that 1 week for free ruins the business and the checks are useless.

I keep my word, lifetime free in debt analysis of any input of your choosing.

Just found this thread.  What a fun read.

What made you change your mind 20 minutes after accepting the deal?  Did it take you 20 minutes to realize how easy it actually was for dkbit98 to earn $2,000 for one post and a CTRL + V?

Guess someone found some services in under 15 minutes and had to edit posts before a reply from dkbit arrived.  Damn it, dkbit.  Had you been quicker, this thread would have been so much more fun to follow!  It would have ended as a 'how quickly can saxydev do the Houdini move'

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

Did he really found it? Post it than. Still waiting lol

Did you accept the deal? No need to post if you don't accept the deal.  ;)

But seriously, anyone with a brain cell can easily find plenty of options available online. Some of them even offer free options. So, what's the point you're trying to make? Can you explain how your service is different? Are there any features that set it apart? Can you provide an example using a random address for comparison?

Anyway, from what I've seen in your previous posts, I honestly doubt that you have the technical know-how for in-depth blockchain analysis. No offense, but I need some convincing. Show me I'm wrong, I'll eat my words with a side of humble pie.

I have those addresses too, they're listed here (http://alladdresses.loyce.club/all_Bitcoin_addresses_ever_used_in_order_of_first_appearance.txt.gz) :P

That's good advice on anyone when dealing with immutable crypto currencies.

Lol. Did you realize starting a post like this already gives the reader a certain first impression of you?

Lol. No sarcasm this time, this is funny :D

I know nothing about "Pi" and don't care enough to read up, so I won't respond to those posts.

I've seen your "AML checks (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5403595.0)" topic, which is of course BS. You can't have a "universal" database of "bad things" if it varies per country what is or isn't considered "bad". The notion of "taint" is BS, I'm pretty sure it's designed as an attack on Bitcoin because governments and banks can't shut down Bitcoin in any other way. By attacking it's fungibility, they make people doubt it. So anyone trying to profit of this helps spread this crazy anti-Bitcoin idea.
I really hope nobody is stupid enough to pay $250 to have someone poke around in their privacy, but (ironically) if someone's dumb enough to do so, I expect it to be people with bad intentions because they're the ones trying to get away with something. So that means if your AML "service" gets used, it's likely you'll be paid with "illegal funds".

That's unethical, but not illegal.
For what it's worth: if someone wants to pay me to tell them their Bitcoin isn't tainted, feel free :D

Of course they don't do it for free, they're selling the idea of taint. That's their business model, and having people believe they need to buy is their core business. Stop buying this, you're not paying someone to check the history of the banknotes in your wallet, so don't do it for electronic cash either. Fungibility is all that matters, and Bitcoin is fungible.

There are no debts in Bitcoin inputs.

According to ninjastic.space (https://ninjastic.space/search?author=saxydev&topic_id=5436291), he initially accepted the deal:

https://i.ibb.co/ysXfQGp/jHmZorl.png

Later on, he chickened-out and cancelled the deal:

https://i.ibb.co/gj0W44w/5dUI48R.png

However, after being ridiculed by PrivacyG he became brave again:


Now I am also barely waiting to see if he'll pay him doing the Houdini move, after dkbit98 will provide the links.

https://i.ibb.co/ch382YH/YBEIkrg.png

---

The deal circus is still on, PrivacyG! The clown saxydev found his balls again and double downed the deal!

I could not understand why o much proof for the editing. ninjastic as well as image and so on. Proof could be required if it was denied and there was no mentioned edit. As we can see edit we do not need to do so much research. Anyway, when anyone edits that means s/he was wrong and that was his/her wrong/mistake and changed his/her mind.

---

All of us now on is on the ignorelist of saxydev.

Haha, I have actually deleted you from the ignore list as you replied to my thread and this topic, I had to unignore to see your posts.

@loycev

----reply here later

@NewsletterBitcoin - idiots showing off his small pp with big screens

OK, you initially accepted to pay me 0.1 Bitcoin if I post a website that can make free analytics and you need to honor that deal or I will consider you a scamming liar and give you negative tag.
Like I promised, I am keeping my word and I am posting one free website that is called antinalysis.org (https://antinalysis.org/), so I will now post my BTC address and I expect to receive 0.1 BTC you promised to send me.
I know few more services that are doing similar things and I know few people wanted to created their own websites like this, but I previously said I will post only one website for 0.1 BTC, I can post more if you send me more bitcoins.
Saxydev you have 24 hours to pay what you promised to my address: bc1qnnkav38ze4uxhk0ac70g8lqcgxc37492lrpwr9

Nose on that image you posted is getting bigger and bigger, and I am patiently waiting to see ''dev'' reaction

PS
I am going to donate % of Bitcoin I receive from saxydev to randomly selected members who wrote in this topic before this post, so we can have nice party time  8)

This is an aml score which I offer for free on Tron, 9$ on BTC and 9$ on ETH. Plus the site is outdated and limited. Not even close to my free service on trx.

those associations at the end of the page I offer them for free and most of the time, 3-4x more details. Even for the free service on TRX.

Nope. Doesn't count.

And second I have changed my mind about betting, I am sad now about it... But I keep my thoughts on it. There is not such a free service online, even as trial.

It doesn't count because you say so?!
I will repeat again, you have 24 hours to send me 0.1 BTC because I sent what I promised, and nobody can compare something with invisible vaporware shitcoin serice you are offering.
If I don't receive Bitcoin by tomorrow I will create flag against you and give you negative feedback like I promised.
Have a nice day.

Do what you want. But this is not even in the category of the deal you wanted or I have spoke about. You are even talking about two different services.

And again, I have changed my mind about the vote. It's my right.

You can create whatever flag you want, you just can't find it anywhere. It does not exist.

Plus the service you have sent is so poor, try to examine the address you have posted for payment and you will see how futile it is.

-> This is what you have sent me.

my prices for this:

this is what we have talked about:

I don't care about your crazy mind changes, you said that you agree and that is written deal, if you fail to comply and you violated deal we had, so I have full right to create flag against you.
I am happy to hear that you don't care what happens with your account, and I am calling everyone to support this flag against scamming liar saxydev:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086

But you have not delivered what you said it's there for free.

So both parts are up to you? You decide if it's a bet, you decide that you are right?

Judge and executioner? lol ok

Sounds a lot like a certain Andrew Tate guy, if you ask me  8) ^{sorry, I couldn't resist the joke.}


Well there may be free AML checking tools, but the real Wakanda-grade security checks that incriminate you, me, and the neighbor's dog are very hard to get access to, so it could be possible that he has somehow gained (legit) access to such a tool.

I don't think this is warranted. It reminds me of the DT-member who tagged anyone who posted in his sales topic because his local rule said to PM him.
Be honest: you never expected to be paid 0.1 Bitcoin for this, right? So the "Deal. Let's see" was posted out of impulse, and changed within 20 minutes. Besides, saxydev couldn't gain anything from it, you didn't offer him 0.1 Bitcoin if you couldn't keep up your end of the deal.

Since Flags are largely about semantics: I've checked back "the bet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61643866#msg61643866)", to the post you quoted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61639087#msg61639087), which quotes your post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61637885#msg61637885) which shows this quote:
Now the semantics part: saxydev is talking about a debt analyse, and as I said before:
I don't think there's any website that offers a free debt analysis on Bitcoin inputs. So, saved by his lack of English skills, saxydev is correct:

---

---

I strongly dislike saxydev's "taint" BS service, but I don't think Bitcointalk will be a better place if we start Flagging users on what I call a temporary lack of judgement.

Yeah sure, and he could also have access to nuclear switch button...  :D

I did expect it and it was fair price I asked for something I delivered, and he broke agreement we made.
Imagine if we made deal about anything else and I spent hours doing some work for him, than I found out he changed his mind later.
In any normal website for selling stuff he would get negative rating for that, and if I wanted to make a joke I would ask for much more Bitcoin from him.
Since I didn't receive promised Bitcoin, flag stays and if you don't agree Loycev you can always vote against it.
I simply don't trust this ''dev'' who changes mind and sells shitcoins snake oil.

Why the heck would I have to pay him anything when I delivered website like I promised?!

You can't seat on two chairs at the same time.

Flag against saxydev:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086

I thought of it as a bet, but you're right, it was an offer.

Come on, you didn't realistically expected him to pay, didn't you?
And, as Loyce said, is somewhat a gray area there. So imho it make more sense you just tag him properly instead of pursuing a flag, since a tag is clearly your opinion.

I don't want to be one of his customers, clearly, since whatever he tells today may not stand tomorrow, but, again, that's not the material for a flag.

Do you like to repeat same thing that LoyceV asked me or you don't understand answer I already wrote to him before?
Please don't make me write the same thing again, it's simple, we had a public deal agreement that he accepted, than he tried to evade and eventually he didn't honor his word.
If you don't agree with me than you can always support saxydev flag:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086

This (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435940.msg61649158#msg61649158) is why :) Besides, the scammer could also delete the post and I wanted to make sure it's still visible (here) for everybody.

---

Yup, very fun! And, apparently I was right before, when I said


Oh well, he did not get a negative feedback (yet), but he has a flag created against him.

---

Looooool!

---

It was funny the way you said but the truth is that while Tate has collection of Lambos inside his garage this pauper is eating the mess from under his fingernails while trying to scam innocent people from the forum.

---

Being serious now, I kept thinking about this case for the last days. I was first tempted myself to create a flag against the possible scammer. I believed that a type 1 flag (or even type 2) are correct. Then I thought again and I abandoned the idea. However, after more "analyse" (/s) I truly believe now that saxydev deserves that flag.

I saw LoyceV and NeuroticFish asking dkbit98 same question: "Be honest: you never expected to be paid 0.1 Bitcoin for this, right?.

The fact that dkbit98, I, others (most likely saxydev himself too) did not really expect to end up with a payment made by the scammer to dkbit98 does not change the fact that saxydev broke the deal unilateral.

Furthermore, the fact that "Deal. Let's see" was posted out of impulse and changed after 20 minutes is not a reason for a unilateral breaking of a written deal. And this is what saxydev did. Out of impulse or not, everybody is responsible for his actions. And has to respond for his actions. If I am brave idiot at a moment and decide to go in the middle of the street saying I won't be hit by any car and in the next 20 seconds I say "I changed my mind and I understand that cars may hit me" -- but just before finishing saying this a car hits me -- then what? I am allowed to travel back in time because I stepped in the middle of the street out of an impulse? No. I will go to a hospital instead (hoping that I am still alive) and I am paying for my actions, be it taken or not out of impulse.

Furthermore, the case here is not a hypothetical one as the one I wrote above. The case here has two parties, both responsible for their actions, which settled a deal together, on their own will, nobody forcing a party or the other to accept the deal. And the deal was the following:


This deal did not involve any clauses such as "deal can be cancelled unilateral if a party changes his mind within 20 minutes" / "the deal can be cancelled if a party acts out of the impulse" etc. The only specified clause is the highlighted part.

Having the deal terms set, the deal was sealed here:


At this point the deal is real, it's settled; it's written down.

Next, the party which respected his party of the deal proves the fact that he made his part and is waiting for the second part to honor his part as well:


The counter-party initiates the scam, by not willing to respect his part:


Again, being sad, gay etc. was not written as clause, therefore it can not be mentioned as a reason for not honoring the deal. At this point, the second party exited the deal, trying to unilateral cancel it. Furthermore, remember that the scammer already changed his mind once, at post #22. So at post 20 he accepted the deal; then tried once to cancel it, by editing his post. At post #22 he still wants the deal, only for trying to cancel it once more, after dkbit98 actually delivered his part of the deal. So he accepted, wanted out, accepted again and wanted out once more. This behavior can simply not be tolerated when it comes about written deals!

And this is the moment when (normal) consequences appear and each one has to be responsible for his own actions:


So we have (1) dkbit98, which honored his part of the deal and (2) saxydev, which did not honor his part. As a consequence, dkbit98 created the flag.

The definition of the flag says precisely what happened:

https://i.ibb.co/ss7h3fZ/Xng5czF.png

In this case, the damage consists in 0.1 BTC which dkbit98 did not receive from the other party, although he was entitled to receive this amount. dkbit98 was scammed by saxydev. Therefore I, for one, have to agree with dkbit98 when saying the following:


The following part is emphasizing even more the possible outcomes in the theoretic situation when he would actually have to sweat in order to deliver his part and, again, I fully agree:



Of course, it was no joke, but a written agreement. If saxydev considered it a joke then, again, it's his fault and, once more, he has to be responsible for the consequences of his actions.

Now the profile of saxydev is painted with trade with extreme caution. I think now saxydev will ignore all the DT and also saxydev will create a new list of his/her trusted person. And in this way, saxydev will see a good profile of him/her. Trade with extreme caution will not be shown to him/her on his her profile.
https://img001.prntscr.com/file/img001/X1hvwlqoRB6YycsOWS4QeQ.png (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410716)

OK, OK, you convinced me. I'll support too the tag.

Loooool!

---

https://i.ibb.co/ch382YH/YBEIkrg.png


To make sure, he will also ignore all DT2 members. At least, this is how things should be done thoroughly. Maybe DT3 too.


Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size, saxydev applies the following principle for solving issues: treat the effect, not the cause. For example, if he is driving and hears a weird sound coming from the engine or from under his car, he will simply insert some cotton wool inside his ears and - voila! - no sound is heard anymore! The car runs like it's brand new!

Similar, in this case, creating a personal Trust list will certainly clear his profile. Can't be otherwise, can it? O0

---

Thank you, NeuroticFish!

Somehow this whole situation seems like OP and saxydev have a beef and OP has simply managed to raise a mob due to his bitcointalk influence.

Yes this is an alt account ( from what I'm seing having a beef with GazetaBitcoin is enough enough to be marked as a scammer and Trust to be nuked), no I am not saxydev, though I am from the same region as him and OP so I did follow their beef in the regional threads aswell, here's my 2 cents though:

Saxydevs aml service:   While it's unethical ( assuming he has access to some free tools which are probably available to anyone with a thorough search on the internet) how does it actually qualify as a scam ?  Unethical sure, as he's charging for it, but then again seems like one of those scenarios where people download a free e-book, no copyrightes attached and sell them to others.

Saxydevs shill of Pi token: A shit coin ? 100%.  Turned out to be a scam ? Nope, simply a shitcoin that people have been "mining" with their phones for years, remember the ads about it for years now, looked recently into it as I've "mined" about 300 of those, which apparently are trading OTC at this point.

Regarding the Flag, it seems that while he initially said yes, after 20 minutes he went back on it, and said "no deal", so how exactly does that constitute as a broken contract when the other party of the "agreement" didn't come forward between those 20 minutes.

Are you basically saying that for example, I decided to buy a car, I call the dealership and tell them I'll buy X car, then I change my mind call them back and say I won't anymore, that I'm liable for it? That I've broken a contract and the dealership expects me to pay the amount regardless?


Now regarding GazetaBitcoin, I've honestly always considered you to be one of the highest standing members of the bitcointalk community (at least in the Romanian section) and have always followed your articles/interviews, and honestly this is simply dissapointing, you've established an online image here, and presence, and honestly you should do better!  Saying things like " Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size"   or "He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile".  

While you ended your OP with:  Although I have no clear evidence that he is a scammer, you also stated in the same OP "the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight." or "the scammer alleges that he has thousands of BTC, ETH and TRX addresses"  so which is it, wasn't the Scam Accusations thread supposed to be a place for actual scams !? Isn't the whole format there for a reason?  Amount Scammed, Payment Option, Proof of payment, Pm, Chat logs? Why isn't this thread in the Reputation sector of the forum, where you could have actually made a case regarding this, supposedly without the "low iq, low education" and actually do a proper analisys as you're well known for on this forum? Why did you go about it as an angry middle schooler?

Most dissapointing aspect, why did most of the higher trusted members participating in this thread didn't call out OP on this, is this how the Trust system should work? How the flag system is intended to work?  Why did no one other than Loyce question it?.

OP: You might want to reconsider your standing and general image when you feel it's appropiate to call someone "a very low level of education" and "low iq". Since you are/were one of the most respected members here, you should do better!



P.S. - Yes I do expect to be considered saxydev's alt account due to not following the general mindset on this thread, I do believe saxydev's oppinions on segwit are dog poop, same as his belief in PI token,  and yes I also believe that this was massively mishandled by GazetaBitcoin and most of the people on this thread.  And yes, I am expecting to be blasted with red trust for it.

Although you seem biased to defend the scammer, I will try to answer you point by point.


I think that everybody could see that, since this is your very fist post.

---

You are entitling me with a power which I don't have, never had and, most likely, never will have.

---

I also noticed that you are not him, since your English is way better than his.

---

My answer is the following:
1. First of all, the title of this thread says his is a "possible scammer", not a scammer

2. First sentence of this thread says again the same syntagma: "I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer"

3. Checking money in Romania is illegal. As I told him too (in post 10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61637863#msg61637863)), if you are unsure, go yourself to ANAF and tell the inspectors there you are doing what saxydev does. If you'll do that I also suggest you to bring a suitcase with some cloths and basic needs as it's possible to not return home for a long time.

4. Speaking at large, many Romanians are focused on pilfering. Do you know what pilfering is? "Gainarie" -- there, you know now. Most of those which are looking for pilfering are also illiterate, underclassmen and, as their intellect did not allow them to follow a proper education (finish high school, go to a college, get a good job), many of them become interested in earning money in a easy way, doing various small thefts and so on. Being Romanian, I believe you know this pattern. Many of them are Gypsies, but there are also Romanians sharing same behavior. Some of them managed somehow to learn a bit about technology and Bitcoin and ended up here, looking for online victims.

Since I came on this forum I also found other Romanians looking for pilfering: andulolika (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059) and bekli23 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237001.msg54455865#msg54455865). Do you know them? Both are illiterate; both are underclassmen (look at how they type in Romanian and English); both are shady; both try to earn a buck from those which are naive enough to pay them. andulolika was offering translation services, while he was unable even to spell his name (and after he made death threats on the forum and self admitted he is a ban evader), while bekli23 (which has a topic dedicated to him inside Investigations board) was claiming that he can decrypt any Bitcoin wallet or that he moved ("offline", according to him) the coins generated by Bitcoin's genesis block (which are technically not movable).

So each of these guys are trying to catch a fish, with various idiocies. saxydev is just like them: he is selling for money a service which can be accessed for free on Internet and which is also illegal. But, considering his pattern, I said he is a possible scammer (in the end he showed his real character and actually exposed himself as a scammer).

To conclude, while his shitty business did not automatically mean he is a scammer, his kind of being (which is very often found in Romania) made me raise an alarm about this guy. The topic was for raising an alarm. What happened later -- meaning the way he exposed himself as a true scammer, that's another story. But the topic was created for making people aware that he could be a scammer.

---

His shills toward Pi have nothing in common with our subject. The reference I made in OP was solely for mentioning another example of where he showed how illiterate he is and what monumental stupidities he is able to write.

---

I will explain.


Now read again the highlighted part.

Do you sense the difference between "tell" and sign (n.b. sign the deal)? Verba volant, scripta manent. You are showing as a counter-example a situation where you say some words out of your mouth and you compare that with signing an agreement?

Obviously, if you say on the phone to a car dealer that you want a car and then you call back and say you changed your mind, nothing will happen. That's because you did not sign anything. However, if you would have signed a paper with the dealer, the verbal cancellation could not occur. Or, at least not so easy. Maybe you could still cancel after you signed, but you would pay a penalty anyway, as a cancellation policy.

Furthermore, if the call would be recorded, in this hypothetical case of yours, then your "yes" would have the power of a signed agreement and again, you would not be able to cancel anymore (or you'd pay a cancellation policy).

So, as you see, even in your case (which is not saxydev's case), even just by "telling" you'd be in same situation.

Coming back to our case, saxydev and dkbit had no cancellation policy. However, since the deal was made based on mutual agreement of the two parties, it's common sense that it's cancellation would have also to imply both parties and not allow a unilateral cancelling. And, since dkbit98 did not agree with the cancelling proposal of saxydev, this implied that the deal was still valid. Does this make sense?

---

Thanks, I appreciate.


I am sorry for disappointing you. You should know though, while saxydev swore at me, I merely used a medical term for describing his condition. If you'll make some research, you'll find out that imbecility is a medical condition, not a libel. Regarding the low education of saxydev, or my statements about him being an illiterate -- just watch how he types; it's visible from the Moon. About my statement that he is an underclassman -- I admit, it's only a supposition. However, from the way he types I would bet that he is not a Ph.D. Feel free to think the opposite, though.


Perhaps you see him very well educated, uhm?

---

Pardon me for not repeating everywhere the term "possible" in front of "scammer".


Apparently, "scammer" is the correct term, since he scammed dkbit98 soon after I initiated this topic.

---

Thanks for the reminder. I will update OP with the amount scammed of 0.1 BTC.

Later edit: just did it. OP title is also updated accordingly, in order to properly reflect the situation.


The thread doesn't belong to Reputation, as it's dedicated to someone which was believed to be a "possible scammer" and which later became a "real scammer".

---

Probably I bribed them all. Most likely, I bribed dkbit98 as well, for him to create the flag and also to lure poor and naive saxydev with that appealing offer, making sure saxydev will bite the bait?


Yes, like a mafia. For more information, feel free to talk to wolwoo. He was first who exposed this:

---

I placed a screenshot above, perhaps you missed. Let me help you out:


Do you see the highlight from the screenshot? There is the key for your question.

---

I would not dare to speak instead of LV but, however, I believe that he did not understand the whole case from the beginning and he understood it when he said this:

---

Thank you for the compliments, but you tell me: how would you call someone unable to barely spell his name? A cultivated genius?

---

I hope I answered to all your claims. If I missed any, let me know.

Where I live, verbal contracts are just as valid as written contracts. And it's allowed to record any conversation you're having, which makes it easy to prove.

It still feels like tricking someone into having an excuse to create a scammer Flag. It was obvious nobody is going to pay $2000 for posting a link.
How about this: "The next user who posts after me, agrees to pay me 0.1 Bitcoin." That sounds like a casual agreement to me. But it shouldn't be allowed!

Then no one will be agreed with your demand. But if anyone feel comfortable than still the person may choice it. I think no one will choose it as there is no benefit/profit. As no one will buy anything @1000$ which real value is 5$. On the contrary if you say I will give 5$ to anyone who will be the next poster of me. By posting after you will not make me loser so I And everyone will accept your offer as everyone can want to buy any product at 5$ which real value is 1000$ or more than the asking amount.

Actually anyone can accept your offer of the person has benefit/profit.

Yes, it was clearly a trap, hence my reluctance to flag that guy. But nobody has forced him to accept the deal.
saxydev was too keen to paint himself as.. something he isn't, hence he has fallen into that trap.
Sorry, but doing business for such an account/person is risky.

I didn't make a trap for anyone and I didn't call ''next user'', I talked with one specific user and he replied.
If he didn't brag so much about his revolutionary invisible universal service than I wouldn't be challenged to tell him before there are free services like this.
He said this is not true and that made me ask him to pay me if I provide a link, then he agreed, so there is clear history here, unlike your imaginary ''next user''.
Again, anyone can easily oppose the flag... instead of writing theoretical fairy tales ;)

PS
Nobody noticed how saxydev mysteriously dissapeared from forum after this event on 25 January  :D

I check each time I reply on this thread what is the last online of saxydev. Cause we may not get a response from saxydev as s/he can ignore us. So, I want to verify whether s/he has not been online or ignoring us. I think saxydev is now on holiday or checking the situation from an alt account.

The service like what dkbit have offered (the link he sent), I offer myself a better version but for free to check on TRX and for less than 3$ on subscription for BTC/ETH. Check my thread again.

Too many replies to quote or answer to everyone. I think I reacted fast to dkbit and modified and kept in the post the fact that I modified, for the critics, it is no shame to realise when you are wrong or about taking the bait for something stupid or which can be used against you.

@NewslletterBitcoin give us the law which makes it illegal, year and furthure modification. There is not such a law.

I wanted to reply to this topic but at a moment the thread was locked at that moment I realised no matter how much I am in good faith, I was made a criminal for them.

This is not ok, but I have nothing else to do.

Right now I am having a busy week so I can't check the forum more than 2-3 times/week.

This is a trust abuse all of these for some attention and some small payout from a signature campaign.

And hell yeah, my 400th post on this forum

Things are getting more curious now.

Belkin1986 left today a red flag on saxydev's profile, accusing them of scamming Belkin out of 0.0071 Bitcoin.  I invited Belkin on this topic to write their story because something fishy is definitely going on here.

Before Belkin gets to share their story, do you have anything to say about it, saxydev?  Or, was it just another written agreement you did not fulfill?

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

That's Untrusted feedback from a Newbie without Reference link. It lacks evidence.

This is irrelevant for the deal. You two made a deal which implied dkbit98 to present an example of a free service, without talking anything about the quality of the respective service. And he provided what he had to. You, on the other side, scammed dkbit98.


Oh no... poor man, he is overwhelmed...


Correct. it's no shame to realize you are wrong, that you did the wrong thing, that you took the bait for something stupid and so on. But when you realize that you also have to take responsibility for your actions and pay for them. If you drive while being drunk and Police stops you, then you may realize what you just did. However, realizing the fact is not synonymous with paying for doing the wrong thing. If you realize you just drove while being drunk, you still have to pay the sanction given by Police, they may still take your driving license etc. Similar to this case, you realize what you did was wrong. Now pay what you owe to dkbit98 and move forward and try to not scam people anymore.


That would be the second time when you say "there is no such thing".


You are pretty jumpy with this "there is no such things". Last time you used it you got yourself in a ~2300$ debt.


That's just another lie. I never locked this topic.


Good faith? You acted with good faith? Looooooooooooool!


Congrats for reaching this great number! Make sure you post it here: Announce your rank up, merit or any achievements that makes you feel great! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391471.0)

---

True. Yet, if you look again, you'll also notice that it is also the second untrusted feedback saying saxydev scammed someone. True, the other feedback does also not have a reference link. And curiously, saxydev also accused his accuser of being a scammer (however, the reference link he provided shows nothing relevant). Theese feedbacks may not be, indeed, circumstantial evidence.

However, in Romania we have a saying: "there is no smoke without a fire". In our case, it would mean that these feedbacks would not appear just like that, out of nowhere. Maybe there is a grain of truth inside them. Of course, everybody can also say "maybe not". But seeing what saxydev did in plain sight to dkbit98, this could add some traction to the accuses he received as untrusted feedbacks.

Hi, I have saved the whole history and can post it. He wrote to me yesterday that he would like to send me the Bitcoin back, I'll wait, otherwise the whole process will come in here.

Liar!
This thread was not locked, and you were not online for days with this profile.

I am still waiting for you to pay me ''small'' payout you owe me.
Your profile have all neutral feedback, and flag against you still stands is because you need to pay me 0.1 BTC.
If you are so poor that you don't have 0.1 BTC, I can also accept for you to pay me monthly or weekly in smaller denominations, until you pay the full amount.

Creating feedback for someone without providing any links, history or some proof is worthless in this forum, and that goes for all members not just for this case.
I was wondering for what service exactly did you pay 0.0071 BTC to member saxydev?

Hello saxydev,

after reviewing your case, it's very clear that DT is right to bring up a scammer flag on your account. I'm always giving members a benefit of doubt but your case is really unfortunate because all evidence is right here.
The flag brought up by dkbit98 applies because you accepted the deal (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61646479#msg61646479). It's archived. You might have a different point of view but DT is a decentralized system and as long as dkbit98's accusation is valid, the flag is appropriate.

You can only get rid of the flag by making dkbit98 roughly whole and even then, there's still your fraudulent service (but your fraudulent service is not related to your flag).
So, yes, make dkbit98 roughly whole and he might forgive you.

In addition it's a bit weird that such a flag really gets opposition. It's not a good showing to side with a scammer...

Let's wait for Belkin1986's evidence if there's even more fraud.  :)

---

And may I ask, why you also defended a dangerous fraud Shitcoin?  ::)

---

You are missing the point that a Shitcoin is mostly harmless and "just" resulting in a loss (by simply holding it).
PI is a fraudulent shitcoin where harm is actively done in multiple ways:

PI is only available for people doing KYC. This results in possible identity theft, which is even more harmful that just a financial loss. PI is a private company and should be sued and punished for requiring KYC.
PI is advertising to be mined via phone, which is potentially damaging for the phone but at least it's unprofitable by making false promises.
PI is a glorified ponzi.

And the only winners of PI Shitcoin are the founders!

Supporting a fraudulent Shitcoin like PI should be highly discouraged.

I also noticed this ridiculous lie -- and also the fact that the scammer acted in good faith. Have you ever thought the opposite?  ::)
I really don't understand how some can say such lies in your face when it's crystal clear that whay they say is a lie...


Dear dkbit98, I believe you have too high expectations here :) Of course the pauper does not have 0.1 BTC. As I explained before,


Imagine his lunch: dirt from four fingernails; dinner: dirt from three more fingernails. On the other side, waiting him to pay on weekly / monthly basis could work, but you know what that would mean, don't you? It would mean for him to scam some more until payment date =)))

---

You'd be surprised, but the scammer also supports KYC. According to a post he made inside Romanian board,


In English, he is saying that "KYC will be extremely important for financial security in crypto, but not yet". Although both I (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435710.msg61646843#msg61646843) and PrivacyG (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435710.msg61647349#msg61647349) asked him what he means with this idiocy, he never replied. He replied saying something else, of course, but without answering to our questions.

So what can you expect from someone supporting KYC? To believe anything from your valuable topic Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221497)? He won't of course. And, even more bad, he may also make others believe that KYC is safe for them, luring them into traps which they never imagined before.


What I find to be more ironic and amusing is that the scammer did not oppose the flag =))) It's like he admits his guilt

---

Belkin1986, do you have any update on this matter?

Belkin1986, do you have any update on this matter?
[/quote]

Yes, it was about an account that he wanted to sell me. After the bitcoins had been sent, it became quiet. Since the thread has been here, he sent me all Bitcoin back yesterday.

Then adjust your feedback.

I was busy, but what else can be said? To make you enjoy yourselves and make more signature posts? Neah. I am off this thread

Just fyi, he did not send any link regarding my service. The link he had sent, contains not daily updated databases, and for TRX, myself I charge 0$, just 4$ for a monthly subscription on BTC. (it's a different service than our agreement (if you still believe i had an agreement with him)).

So I have not broken any contract yet. just saying

@NewsletterBitcoin - I still did not received the law refference from you.. ;(

FYI, such terms were never specified in your original agreement. Allow me to quote you:


So, you see, you ambiguously stated that "there is no such a service for free anywhere", without specifying its required features or that it must be an exact copy of yours. The word 'such' in this context is a pronoun used to describe a thing of a similar type or category as something previously mentioned.

As I see it, dkbit98 successfully proved that there is such a service for free after you accept the deal.  ;)

Don't lose too much time with this scammer, it's pointless. He is not not just a "normal" scammer, but also a stupid one. He was that stupid that he actually pushed someone to make a deal with him, in plain sight, while many eyes were on him, just to scam that person while having everybody's attention. Lol! I never saw anything like that. Usually scammers work in the dark, hoping to not be caught. This one is a monument of stupidity.

Please don't forget to support  created by dkbit98.

 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086the flag[/url)

---

Furthermore, even after dkbit98 posted the site, the scammer denied its existence (facepalm):


This reminds me of a specific city of Romania (Caracal), where it's said that the carriage of idiots flipped over. Among some examples of stupidity, it's said that, when a guy from Caracal sees his a giraffe, when he looks at it he says <<this does not exist!>>". :) So he actually sees the giraffe with his own eyes; yet, it does not exist. Just like saxydev.

(For the lulz, if you want to know, in Caracal there is only one school and its name is School #2; they built a building and they forgot the crane inside it; the door of Police precinct was stolen; the graveyard is on Resurrection Street; the bakery is on Hunger Street; the jail is on Freedom Street; the headquarters of firemen caught fire; on the display of the clock placed inside the train station, which uses Roman numbers, hour 4 is displayed as "IIII" instead of "IV". I really believe that saxydev is from Caracal.)

---

Oh, no! But when the guy paid you were not busy, huh? Just by coincidence, in that moment you were not busy so you took his money. And, bad luck, since then you were so busy that you simply did not find the less than 30 seconds necessary for paying him back.

Probably also because of being busy you did not pay yet to dkbit98 too?


dkbit98, you were so right! This guy is so active in business that he does not even have time to send a payment from his crypto wallet. Please understand him.


You could have said, at least, "I am sorry for trying to scam you and for paying you back with delay and only after you raised this problem in the eyes of many witnesses". But what can know about manners a Neanderthal like you?


That should be third or fourth time you said that, yet you still come back. Perhaps, if you keep returning, next time you'll come back also with dkbit98's money? Write it on a note or something, to not forget. We all know that being so busy like you it's possible to forget minor details (a debt to Belkin1986, another one to dkbit98 -- minor stuff like that).


Perhaps you misread your agreement.


You hadn't? Then what's this supposed to mean?



Then what did you do?


Just saying what?


And that makes you sad... poor baby... Have you visited ANAF headquarters, as I instructed you? I told you that the inspectors there will point you exactly what you need to know.

One thing is analyse of inputs (there is nothing as such for free online) and another thing is an aml score, he provided a link for aml score. As it is on my thread, I also offer to do it for free on TRX!

Why would I argue that there is no service online for free when myself I am offering it for free!? or a really small fee (in case of BTC/ETH).

@NewsletterBitcoin

Stop speaking if you don't know what happened. I asked the guy since 21 and after on 25th if he wants his money back. Things happen, people get busy.
And about ANAF, as a matter of fact, I don't think they have risk management in crypto (as a division) in Romania yet. But I can give if you want some numbers of some people from there to put you on topic lol. I am really sad, there is a small chance for me to be back in Romania this year (too much headache for the visa), I was just on a flight change on Monday from Istanbul, perhaps next time year, would've been cool to prove you are wrong.

Oh, what a generous lil' scammer we have here! Isn't he simply kawaii?  ::) He's doing it for free...


Lol, good question! Then why do you argue since yourself are offering it for free? Oo


Oh, I totally understand. I actually said that. I was merely explaining dkbit98 why you haven't paid yet the ~2200$ -- because you are a very busy and active businessman, just like he thought you are.


Nah, I'm okay, thank you. Perhaps you want to call them? Also let them know if you pay taxes for the incomes you have from your "free" service scams.


Oh, what a loss! I feel devastated!

---

I still don't understand... how about this statement you keep breaking?

Why would I owe money to ANAF?

Still waiting on the law or any kind of note where it says it is illegal.

NewsletterBitcoin said:

I don't understand this..What do you mean?

The entire ideea was not on aml score, that can be for free online (even tho 95% are innacurate or scams), I stated in my the post previous dkbit making the bet. In depth analyse of inputs is offered by nobody for free.

What is wrong with you? Seriously now.

You are making posts and replies to every 2-3 words of what I am saying and answering only to what you like/preffer avoiding context and making so much fuss of some misinterpretations of my vocabulary. English nor romanian is my native language, where is the point in this brain ass showing off?

Man, you are too dumb for this era. Where did you take that from? Where have I ever said you owe money to ANAF? Jesus!


And I told you already (3-4 times) to call your "friends" and they will explain you. I won't lose time for checking penal code just for proving you something.


Obviously you don't understand, since your peanut brain is unable to compute, to understand a joke or a subtle thing. You are part of those obnoxious people to who others have to explain them a joke, aren't you?


The real question is what is wrong with you.


Yes, and I'm doing this for debunking every allegation you make, step by step. For proving either what a liar you are or what an imbecile you are.


What misinterpretations?


That can be seen from the Moon. But your biggest problem is that, while you are Romanian, Romanian language is a stranger for you. Poor English can be understood, up to a point (you are far beyond that point, anyway). But to not know even your national language; to act like you and it have nothing in common; to break the language by each sentence you say -- that's a terrible shame! Sadly for you, you'll live with this shame for the rest of your life.

---

When are you going to answer this question? I already asked you twice.

You are pumping after certain intervals of time this topic just to find yourself in the center of attention.


Why would I pay them taxes?


How did you get to the assumption that romanian is my native language/national language?

Dear NewsletterBitcoin , if you are not able to do a simple search on some laws, why are you so much certain about them?

You are wrong again. I am not pumping it on purpose; I am simply replying you. And, if I want someone to be in the center of attention, that would be you, not me.


Seriously, are you that imbecile, to not know that you have to pay taxes for your incomes?


Just like that: I assumed. Probably, you wanted to ask how I reached the conclusion that you are Romanian, not the assumption. But "conclusion" is a word too complex for your baboon lexicon, isn't it? Anyway, if you want to know how I came to this conclusion, I will say that I did it since I saw you are posting in Romanian board. Was that too hard to think about?


You are asking all sort of non-sense here. What you ask is like asking to prove that you are forced by law to not drink and drive, to not act like a Police man, to not shoot people etc.

Again, you are not right. There are countries where is not forbidden to drive when you drink or high limits, there are countries where you can hold your ground and just shoot.

Laws are different everywhere, I am not a subject to romanian law, but there is no law that prohibits it and there are directives on encouraging aml checks.

Don't play again with my vocabulary: assumption: "Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof; a supposition" .


Are you sure you know what you are talking about? I am not subject for any tax on crypto in my country where I have my fiscal residence.

edit: over time I think I posted in multiple local threads, I do speak 7 languages to a proficient level xoxoxo

So, You have accused that you have been scammed and also you have informed us that you have received the refund. But for clarification would you like to share both transactions of sending the payment and the transaction id of the refund of the payment?

Yes, but Romania is not among them.


I highly doubt that.


Exactly: I supposed you are Romanian, without seeing your ID. You quote a dictionary trying to be smart but it only makes you look even more idiot, as you are saying precisely what I said. Let me repeat: I did not conclude, I just assumed. Or, based on the dicitionary explanation, I supposed. This is exactly what I said in my earlier post.


In Romania there is a saying which, as a Romanian which you are, you know very well. I'll share it for others too: fools are not fools enough if they don't wear a hat with diamonds. It means that the fool does everything to impress, to try to get attention, without realizing that what he does only makes him look even more stupid in the eyes of the others.

And this is what you do.


Holy Mother of God! Excuse me! Probably we should take our hats of in front of such well educated person as you are! /s

You are simply acting like those pathetic Romanians, which went to Italy for working on harvesting strawberries for 2-3 months and, when they returned home, they were saying "come si dice to that / come si dice to the other", acting like they were in Italy for decades and they forgot their language. But they were there for 2-3 months. Just like you: you probably bought yourself a low cost airplane to Moldavia or whatever country you went to visit and now you you know 7 languages and forgot your own? Lol! You barely spell your name and you speak 7 languages? =))) Yeah right!

Be aware: using Google Translate does not mean you are speaking a foreign language.

P.S.: belching in French does not mean you speak French.

Excepting that, you better pay 0.1 BTC to dkbit98 instead of bragging yourself.

---

I would also like to see that transaction, if possible.

I refuse to pay for a low quality product which is not even part of the discussion of which deal I not even approved/agreed.


Nobody sent to me any law where it says it is illegal nor a link where the service is given for free yet.

Because you asked your dear friends to support in this bored feud, doesn't mean I have to give you pleasure. You are are just a bored spammer with more complex words @NewsletterBitcoin

That's all that matters from what you said. Quoted for reference.

---

It seems I have to repeat myself: you did not agree for any other terms such as product quality nor any other clause. So stop hiding behind reasons now. Your deal was simple:

---

---

Nobody has to as this was not a part of the deal. Besides, I also told you before I won't lose my time to check the penal code for you.


dkbit98 sent you the link since January 24th.


You are 16 days overdue with your payment.

---

The only pleasure is knowing that another scammer has been exposed and people have a chance to avoid him.


Bored spammer? Lol! After making more than 50.000 good reports for spam posts I am spammer? That was a good joke.

It's not even quality, it is not the product we've been talking about. The product he sent I posted in a post previous to his that can be found online, not accurate or scams. So not what we've been talking.

And ya, you are definetly a spammer. You are bumping the thread at exactly same hours, after a big gap difference between posts just to keep an attention to you.


You are a time waster anyway. Fancy explanations and bullshits won't cover what you are. Being an active member is different than being a piece of shit baboon compilation to the forum. Making translation, not having anything original, failing in everything, like your ex newsletter. Luckily you are earning money from your signature campaign from posts as such.

I appreciate how people saw your newsletter (your initial business here, GazetaBitcoin) and you became a failure, but just posting and copying ideas of 1miau in local topics or gathering information using search, won't make you a user who contributes. It's just an user who seeks attention, trying to do useless jobs for him to be noticed.

I wonder how lame you are in real life lol. I feel pity for you, definetly no highschool friends. Still a virgin? Had to say these nice words towards you NewsletterBitcoin, it is better when you can quote me to refference and reply to each one of them. How silly you will be. Maybe you will ask your friends to help you out in replying, you barely can do it yourself.

You are not capable or mentaly fit to search inside a penal code, so it's ok. I forgive you for being a newbie, an incompetent person.

Considering that the flag against you (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086) was supported by multiple users with experience and reputation on the forum, this means they do not agree with the buzz words you're saying for trying to get away with this.


Please allow me to laugh some more. You are so ridiculous that "ridiculous" is not enough term for what you say.


I told you before: I am simply replying to your imbecilities. And, as I also said before, the attention is kept on you, not on me.


I believe this was meant to be another proof of how well educated you are.


Of course, having a honest job is not something which can be part of your peanut brain of a thief, which is only busy with thinking how to scam more people.


I don't know what you mean.


Yes, lucky me. Unlike you, I am earning money, not losing. But then again, losing money is just a theory for you, as you don't lose anything even when you are supposed to lose, because you are scamming those which you are supposed to pay.
Oh, wait... I thought I was failing at everything. How comes I am lucky in this case though? I feel confused now.


I also appreciated that. Finally, we are on same page here. However, Gazeta Bitcoin was never my business here.


How is that?


Don't forget also that I was "copying" fillippone's ideas too. And LoyceV's. Just to make things clear: by "copying" you mean "translating", right?


Shame on me! Shame!


Thank you, highly appreciated!


Definitely!


How else?!


Thanks again!


Wow, we share same thoughts for the second time already! Great minds think the same, right?


Yes, I will start another topic, in Meta this time, for asking my friends to reply here.


I'm a simple human being. I do what I can.


Oh, I feel relieved now! You are in a very good mood today!

Well, dear Newslleter except ScamVirus and sashan, they are all your friends with whom you are praising each other, every time you have an opportunity. And that's a fact, public on the forum. So I don't mind it.

Being a romanian baboon, who walks on clouds and smokes mud, you look quite educated indeed.


How can you lie it was not your business, when your account is named after it?


Quoted for refference. Also as he earns money honestly and such a good person by keeping this thread open and replying NewsletterBitcoin (aka GazetaBitcoin) agrees to donate his signature money from these posts to the help of the Turkish people!

How nice of you! A baboon learned how to use a map! Being useless finally pays off! Congrats NewsletterBitcoin, you did it! Now you have a purpose in life!

I am amazed that you broke your pattern after I posted about it! Congrats. You did not waited 24 hours to reply to my thread! Nice! I wonder if you will keep doing that and just reply more. Please, do it!

Ah, I know why you are still a virgin , because prostitution is illegal in Romania! Great! Amazing citizen! What a failure! The babooin is respecting the law, congrats again NewsletterBitcoin

I see you are targeted to just barking around and making ridiculous statements, without backing them up by anything.



Obviously, we are a gang.


Please explain what business I ever made on the name of Gazeta Bitcoin (the website) on the forum. Please also explain what business I ever made with the website outside the forum. And please explain what's the connection, inside your orangutan brain, between having this name on the forum and performing any business here in the name of Gazeta Bitcoin website.


Gawd, you are way more idiot that I ever believed...


I told you, I am doing all I can.


And yet more words of wisdom coming from the scammer.

And how can I fight a baboon and a gang?


Only having the name gives you visibility to share your own business, which was a failure, but it is what it is.

By replying to the topic and keeping it active GazetaBitcoin decided to donate his signature campaign earning to the turkish calamities. I will make a thread and a flag for it.


Thanks NewsletterBitcoin! Waiting for the proof of donation! Thanks!

Left you an appropriate feedback:

So, is there any certainty whether my work will be paid or not?

As I said before (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61730193#msg61730193), your peanut brain is unable to compute, to understand a joke, sarcasm or a subtle thing. In this case I was sarcastic.


Share what business? I see you keep avoiding answering this question. What business have I ever made with Gazeta Bitcoin inside or even outside the forum?


What is the failure?


You are acting like a clown. I have never said such things and any normal person can see inside this thread that I never said this.


https://i.ibb.co/SQgFy0P/L34sneR.jpg

---

What do you mean?

i was asking saxydev about my payment for doing some gigs for him.
he promised to sent the money on jan 25th.
never received till today.

This could be the first legit claim in this entire thread...

i've screenshot-ed all of our convo to proof it,
but for now i'm gonna keep it for myself (at least for few days), 
just in case he still want to resolve this matter.

It's good you have some proof ! Hope it gets solved !

If not, I would advise opening a separate scam accusation thread so the info does not get mixed.

You were paid on the 3rd friday. Rescan your monero wallet, should be there


Well.. You didn't have to. I did it. I did it for you, dear NewsletterBitcoin or more recently known as TheBaboonofBitcoin


This is what I said, by continuing you agree directly to the thread. By avoiding replying or not denying you implicit accepted to donate your money.

It's not my fault you are a baboon who can't read through your imbecility arrogance.

Quoted for reference. Now it's also reflected as a negative Trust score on your profile. Most likely, more will follow.

---

Yeah, excepting all the other ones which were also legit. Meaning all other claims ever made inside this topic.

---

Feel free to support the flag opened against the scammer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086.

Furthermore, if you have undeniable proof, post all pics on imgur and feel free to write a negative feedback on his profile, together with opening a new scam accusation topic in Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) board, using the scam report format from here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260073.0). You are the second user complaining (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61700878#msg61700878) about our successful business man saxydev, after a dealing went bad.

Let's agree to disagree... as always  ;)

There are only a few people who blame a nation instead of a person or a few people and you are one of them.

You have just quoted a few words/sentences. But you have not quoted with a link so that the community can check. I think you are telling a lie. If you want to say you are not telling a lie then would you like to share the link to where you got this information? If you think already been deleted then you may show that from https://ninjastic.space/

Those who are honest with their words do not need to fight. Why opposition of you multiple times of your supporter?

Edit:
This is the first time you took part in the opposition while no other DT took part in the opposition of the flag while the flag is active.

@saxydev

nope it still 0 , i checked it on different wallet. rescaned
https://i.imgur.com/cTv0vkG.jpg https://i.imgur.com/h9P5mgt.jpg

(sorry if the screenshots is too big to load)

*update: after i sent screenshot my wallet, he says he is installing wallet now and will send me, lets wait, it should be not take long 


@GazetaBitcoin

For now the best option for me is just waiting for him to send the money,
it should be no more than 30-60mins i think to install wallet and send the money.
lets wait and see.


 (Sorry for my Bad English) 

I am not going to pay you anything more. What I am going to is next 48 hours (if I have time, payments I have sent for this week yesterday, next payments next friday.) to install a monero wallet and share the secret key with the txd.

You should fix yourself the issue. Not my problem

@shasan how is different the situation with NewsletterBitcoin owning money to the turkish people vs what happened with me in this thread?

Then send the TxID and Secret Key so we can confirm that you really already sent it and the issue is really on my side.
After you suggest me to install Cake Wallet, It only take 3-5 mins for me to install it and import my wallet into cake wallet.

It takes 5-10 hours to sync. If it took you 3-5 minutes it means you have done something wrong

There is an option on cake wallet to restore wallet from date,
and i set it 1 day before my wallet created (23rd jan) so i don't have to download the entire blockchain.
since my wallet is less than 3 weeks old it only takes 3-5 mins to synced.
5-10 hours then, okay

I think you just got your answer:


Quoted for reference.

Welcome to the club, c0ldbrewz. As I said before, you are not the only one to whom he said that.

---

I believe you imagine that if the scammer made the payment he could have written the txID from first time, right?

---

If you look up a bit, you will see that the scammer actually admitted that he is writing words in my name, words which I never said:

If for 3 weeks you are waiting 5 minutes, you are doing something wrong. Should be minimum 20-40 minutes

@NewsletterBitcoin when you will send the donation? Or you will scam people from your escrow service?

Glad this user have been nailed finally, I had this saxydev guy on my on my ignore list since God knows when, I can't remember right now, the particular reason why I put him on ignore, but the sure thing is that, I've been suspicious of him for a long time, way long before coming across this thread.

People of his kind should never be allowed a space on this forum, they are the reason why our society is messed up.

@saxydev - you should be really ashamed of your self.

Or you have been smoking the same stuff like saxydev since you are the single person in the entire forum who is opposing my flag against this clown :P
He actually owed money to another member before (and one more now), so this is not first accusation against him, but I guess you didn't read everything carefully.

What work exactly you did for him?
Provide some evidence for your work, it would be interesting to see this, but if address you gave him is showing zero coins, than you should make scam accusation against him.
Even if he paid later than he promised means that he broke one more written agreement, that is reason for another flag against him.
He owes me 0.1 BTC, and I am still waiting to receive this payment from him.

Why do you think these forum members will support you? What you have already done is fraud. There are strong charges against you for non-payment, but you are arguing with everyone here without addressing them. You have an attitude problem, but you like to argue more than pay others, don't you?

What is the fraud part? Not addressing what?


If you will send to me the link I will pay 0.1 btc. Fuck off moron. I am sick of this bullshit


Who the fuck are you? Are you just spamming for your signature campaign 5$ bullshit?


But you did not denied it or been agaisnt it. You just proved yourself with your post. You are replying to only whats in your interest to twist my words.

First of all, you have to proof that NewsletterBitcoin wanted to donate. If NewsletterBitcoin wanted to donate and now deny to donate then the case of you and NewsletterBitcoin will be the same. But we cant say that until you show proof. As I said before you can proof easily even if the post is deleted.

First of all I want to say sorry in advance if I quote some of you that did not want to further participate in this thread !




This thread was initially made the smear saxydev's service. I don't know if you can find it cheaper somewhere else. Or free or whatever... At the end of the day I believe it's not a scam. As long as he does what he says he does. I might not want or need such a service but some might. I fail to see the scam.

After that did not hold much water it was shifted 180 degrees to the back and forth dkbit had with him and the words "Wanna bet I am wright?".
I understand dkbit might frequent the gambling section of the forum more than I do, but as some other users mentioned before me :



So personally I do not find that a binding contract that would convince me to support your flag. You can say it was inpulse. Some might not care. But I fail to see the damages incurred by dkbit.
This is the way I see the situation.
Why do you care if or what I smoke ? I am free to make my own judgement. Can be good, can be bad... but it's mine!

And c0ldbrewz came into the picture after you created that flag. Don't mix them (as I previously mentioned)


But alas, they are now mixed.

If c0ldbrewz provides some more proof and creates a flag I might support that one. But not yours dkbit, regardless of how much or what I smoke ! sorry

He insist that he already sent it on 3rd feb and 100% the money is there on my wallet,
he will send me the TxID and private secret view key as a proof.
let's wait and see.


Is there anyone have experience with monero?
https://i.imgur.com/GHQmzYJ.png

are all this true?

is it really there will be no information available over 2000 blocks?

private secret view keys are attached to address (mnemonic) right not the transaction?

is monero wallet really loads 1 month mostly?

what did he mean i only have sending key but not receiving keys on my mnemonic?
base the info i gathered there's only address, secret view key, secret spending key, never heard of secret receiving key  ???

I did not say anywhere anything about any kind of donation. All you are writing is pure BS, as you already admitted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61747510#msg61747510). Don't worry, your attempt to distract the heat which is over you now simply won't work. If you were not a scammer I would have said that you are acting like a 12 years child.

---

Actually, he did read carefully. And, at first, he activated an alt account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61666135#msg61666135) for taking the scammer's side. I may be wrong, but the coincidence is too big to go unnoticed: immediately after that user posted, Rizzrack opposed the flag. And, by then, not even saxydev was opposing the flag, lol.


In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not, this is not first time when Rizzrack sides with a scammer. He did it in the past once more, with another Romanian scammer, although he supported him only in a softer form.

Do you remember andulolika (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116)? Yes, andulolika which made death threats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116), andulolika the self-admitted ban evader (https://archive.is/ovgVq#msg54801677), andulolika the load defaulter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928293#msg54928293), andulolika the scammer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059).

Long story short, after saying he wanted to slit a forum user's throat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54926471#msg54926471) andulolika decided to start a topic in Romanian board, saying trying to say that he wants to be hired as translator. The scam was the following: since andulolika is even more illiterate than saxydev (although this may look impossible), this it was obvious that he was unable to perform any translation. He was barely able to spell his name. Therefore, anyone paying him would have been scammed, as the underclassman was not able to provide any kind of translation. This is an example (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54926471#msg54926471) of how illiterate he is. The post contains all the spelling mistakes he made within a five sentences post: 24 mistakes. As a consequence of writing that bad, from his topic title could not be sensed if he wanted to hire a translator or to be hired as a translator. And, when I found the topic, I assumed he is looking to hire a translator. Therefore I wrote him a post saying I am interested to be hired as a translator. When he replied he started swearing and talking very bad.

So seeing how bad he writes I quickly understood that he is unable to perform any translation, since he is unable to spell (not even in Romanian). So I wrote this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54918292#msg54918292) in English inside his thread, encouraging users also to read the feedbacks andulolika received. From that point forward he started to yell even more, to curse, swear etc. That's less important, but I had to say for you to understand the context.

And here comes Rizzrack (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54943019#msg54943019) which, instead of exposing the scammer, like anybody which wanted to say something would have done, he actually took scammer's side, in a way. Inside the quoted post he is patronizing like he is the forum owner^*, saying that if I and andulolika want to continue the back and forward to do it in English.

^*Acting like the forum owner can be sensed in this sequence: "Va puteti certa peste tot in engleza (meta, reputation, scam accusation, offtopic, twitter etc.) dar aici scrieti in romana! [...] Ma astept ca toata lumea sa faca la fel. Am mai facut aluzii dar nu prea au fost intelese"

In English it means the following: "In English you can fight anywhere [...] but here you write in Romanian! (n.b. notice the exclamation point from the end of the sentence, like it was an order) [...] I am expecting everybody to do so (n.b. He was expecting, lol. And who was he? Forum owner?). I made some allusions before but it seems they were not understood (n.b. again, acting like an owner. Who was he to make any allusion, anyway?).

And this is precisely what I told him (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54943476#msg54943476) too: I told him I sense the patronizing from his tone and that his allegations sound like orders. Then I recommended him to lose the air of superiority, as he is not superior to anybody here and, certainly, this is not his forum. Besides, there is no rule forbidding English in a local board. And even if I were to break a rule -- which I did not -- that would not entitle him anyway to patronize and talk like he is the landlord and the forum is his land and the users are his slaves. After that he shut up, being forced to do so also by andulolika, which locked his thread.

In any case, until this point, it was a soft attempt of him to side with the scammer. However, he continued. After andulolika told me that he will piss on me and burn me I opened a topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.0) in Meta, asking if this statement can be considered a death threat. Rizzrack showed there as well (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.0;all), now taking scammer's side in plain sight, by saying there is no scam. Obviously, since andulolika did not sign any contract for a translation no scam exists. However, if he were in the situation to get hired, the client would have been certainly scammed. Since the scammer could not spell correctly even the word "Ok", then how could he deliver a translation?!

In the end, this is second time Rizzrack supports a Romanian scammer. And his behavior was noticed by other users too, not just by dkbit98:

---

Your guts were right. As things developed, saxydev "managed" to scam 3 individuals already only since this thread was started. Meaning in only 22 days. That's something, isn't it?

---

Well, it's way easier to blah-blah than taking money out of your pocket, isn't it? :)

---

Playing dumb at level 99+. Obviously, ScamViruS is trying to tell you that you are not addressing the debts you have to pay.


Playing dumb again, to distract attention. dkbit98 already sent you the link. It's right here:



Obviously, by your judgement everyone which is posting here is doing it just for spamming a signature campaign.


I did not deny what? And what means that I proved myself? I proved myself as what?


This is a common sense conclusion. I am, indeed, replying to what I'm interested in: to be more precise, to expose what a scammer you are. However, I am not twisting any of your words. This is exactly what you write.

---

There is nothing to prove. The scammer only tries to distract the attention. He already admitted he is making up words.

Like here:


Or here:


Lol, he is far beyond any level of ridiculousness.

---

First of all, it's "right", not "wright".
Second of all, are you following your favored scammer's path? Twist someone's words? dkbit98 did not make any bet with the scammer. He proposed him a an offer, a deal:


So stop lying in plain sight!


And you understand that from where? And what's the relevance in this case? What's the connection between this habit of dkbit98 (either if he has it or not) and the fact that saxydev scammed him? What you just said is as relevant as you would have said "I understand dkbit might drink more coffee than me". Okay, he may drink more coffee than you. So what? What's the connection?


The fact that you do not expect a win, yet you wait to see the result and the result is the one you anticipated, does not make you ineligible to claim what you just won.

And why don't you quote also the later replies of those which you quoted above? Here, let me help you out:


Picture this: you go to a gambling place and bet that a basketball game will end with a draw. I don't know what you know about basketball, but chances for ending in a draw are infinitesimal. Then, guess what?, the game actually ends in a draw. So you go to the cashier to pay you the money you just won. Based on your judgement, in this example, the cashier is supposed to say: "You never expected to be paid for this, right?". Furthermore, also based on your judgement, if the cashier will not pay you it will be fine. In the end, you did not expect for that game to actually end in a draw. Right?


And why do you care if dkbit98 gambles more than you?

---

Do you see the pattern here?

This waiting and seeing won't take you anywhere. Instead of waiting and seeing you'd better follow dkbit98's advice:


If you are not aware of what is the description of a flag, let me help you out:

https://i.ibb.co/6Z0mjWP/ip-bitcointalk.png

So only the fact that he lured you for 19 days already is reason good enough for creating a flag. And, based on your words, it's been 19 days since he was supposed to pay you.


Furthermore, same thing should have been done by the other user which was delayed with payment (unlike you, this guy was luckier and received the payment, although it was made after the settled date):


In all these cases, based on flag's definition, saxydev violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages.

No. Most of it is just a bunch of bullshit.


No. All the information will remain on the blockchain and on your fully synced node permanently.
 

"The private view key" is not limited to a single address or transaction but rather applies to all addresses within the wallet. Think of it as a private key for creating a watch-only wallet, it cannot be used to sign transactions, but it shouldn't be shared publicly to protect privacy. On the other hand, there is a "transaction key" that is unique to a single transaction and can be used to prove that you have initiated the transaction.

More information here: https://www.getmonero.org/resources/user-guides/prove-payment.html


The reason your wallet is taking so long to sync could be due to a variety of factors. Are you using a normal or lightweight wallet? Are you running a full node or using a remote node? And how's the performance of your hard drive and internet connection? These things can all play a role.


As I mentioned earlier, it's a bunch of nonsense. If your wallet is synced and you can't see the transaction or if the sender can't show the TXID and transaction key, it's a clear indication that he's lying to you.

I have checked the transaction on monero, it is valid, he received. If anyone here out of the gang of The shitnewsletterbitcoin want to check it, add it on discord and I will share it.

@fatfork read the docs of the wallet he is using on and see after.

There is no way, and I have good internet connection and good devices to just sync it in 3 minutes. It just can't be.

But anyway whoever wants to check it I can send it privately, to check that he received. If you want to help him, help him learn how to use xmr.

About the secret receiving key, myself never been in the situation of having a need of it or even to prove it exists in any way in the chain. But what happened is, I think arround March last year, hired someone from the forum to work for me, used an online wallet, some bs and he needed 2 keys to import the wallet somewhere else (and here it is not spend key and priv key about), something close to multi sig, but not really, whatever.

The same happened to him, he was able to import the private spend key in cake wallet for example and after all worked well. But the wallet had another receiving key or whatever who made almost impossible to spend outside of their app. I don't know exactly what I am talking about, I am not sure yet how he done it, but was the same wallet as the putradji is using. I will try to reach that user but I know he was ukranian, he wanted to join the army at the start of the war, he was not accepted and suddenly in October/November he deleted his discord, telegram not replying to emails. Texted him on qtox maybe I will get a reply and help him out, but text me on discord and I will give you the key and txd to check the transaction.

Was writing a reply but changed my mind and deleted it.

This is a thread about saxydev. If you have anything to say about me open a reputation/scam accusation about me.

Until then:

https://i.imgur.com/9Xm2VnT.jpg

P.S. some clarifications are in order though:


My reasoning is that this flag was created ONLY regarding the issues between dkbit and saxydev. Not any additional accusations that have or will be posted in the thread. As I mentioned before: if it becomes clear that c0ldbrewz was not paid for his services and HE creates a flag for that I will definitely support.

Just wanted to reiterate this in case anything was unclear.

Prove it!


Nope, that's not right. When you use a remote node, you don't have to download the whole blockchain to your PC or wait for it to sync. Instead, you can get your wallet connected to the network right away. However, I won't be going into the details of how the Monero network and wallets work here as it would be off-topic. If there's something that you're unclear about and you have a specific question, feel free to open a new topic in the Altcoin section.


Judging from what I see, it looks like neither of you have a good grasp of the Monero network, wallets, or transactions. Or one of you isn't being honest. I'm leaning towards believing @c0ldbrewz more because of some of the bullshit responses you've provided so far. If you want to prove what you're saying, show the transaction details publicly. Otherwise, it seems like you're trying to pull a scam.

@Fatfork
Thanks for the explanation  :)
i created my monero address using this wallet: https://mymonero.com/
and have no trouble at all import it to mobile wallet (cake wallet)

@saxydev
So you have finished installing your wallet and checked it,
then why you haven't send me the TXID and transaction key?
i'm waiting on discord since 18 hours ago
i do also want to check it for myself


if anyone want to help check it by reaching him on discord, this is my address that i send him to receive the payment
https://i.imgur.com/vnJBnS8.png
4B5P6RUPjedUu6xMavFrEdhnPYfgaEmnMHsoRKQf4jC1b2JYShUZdKS1FtDg7Y5phbQnhRY4MoLKZi6 KgR2emFeg9DC3HCG

Sadly I'm gona dissapoint you and say I'm in no way associated with Rizzrack or saxydev, and most of all don't associate with any "groups" on this forum.

Thus the reason I'm posting from an alt account since I'm 100% sure that I'll be painted red, or the least neutral for even blinking at you,  and while Rizzrack has been posting from his own account, I'm assuming he's not worried about going into a fist fight with you over the way this thread proceeded since he has a high ranking account and probably has some support around here.


I still highly believe you influenced the direction of this thread based on your personal dislike or mostly cat fights you had with saxydev in the Romanian section.

I do however believe the new things that came to light, especially the XMR situation are relevant for a flag against saxydev, as I don't believe the whole story, and mostly can't really understand, as he can simply post the transaction key and stop with the syncing of the wallet and other bullshit.


The initial flag report due to that "deal" of giving proof of a service providing those services for free, especially since while initially accepting, he said NO DEAL, long before the other player came forward with some services,  simply shows that it went in the direction you wanted/started the thread cause both you and saxydev couldn't play nice in the Romanian section.




@c0ldbrewz I strongly believe you should create a separate Flag, as this one would actually be a legitimate one where you've provided him a service and he failed to pay ( I don't believe the whole I sent 3 weeks ago but your wallet has syncing problems story, since he can't provide the transaction key).

All I can say is that some people can share a certain thought process. Though to be fair... I read your post after I edited mine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61750984#msg61750984) (because I noticed that quote from 1miau in Newsletter's post) and I almost believed it myself that we were alts  :D

Keep it real Mini-Me !

I will share it to a trusted person outside the gang of ShitBaboonNewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin to verify the transaction, my personal specification is that it is a private matter and I do not make public any of my own addresses or information related to any of transactions public. Working in my domain you may understand that sharing an address is the same as doxing yourself.

it's weird that i haven't received this TxID and transaction key till now,
and yet you want to send it to other people to check it 
i have the rights to check it myself don't you think 
i am the owner of the address recipent.

Come on, why don't you just share the info with the person you were supposed to send the payment to? It'll make sorting things out so much easier.


Sorry to bring up your bullshit again. If you know anything about Monero transactions, you'd know that sharing the transaction ID and key doesn't give away the sender's address. If you're trying to scam someone, you should probably learn the basics first.

Let me say it again, just to make sure everyone gets it. Sharing the tx key or secret transaction key (sometimes called "r" in the CryptoNote white paper and other technical documentation) doesn't prove that YOU made a payment. It only proves that SOMEONE received money.

Instead of asking me, you should pay attention to the feedback on your profile. Because it's all clear there that you're telling lie after lie without keeping your promises. Some users like you appear and do various dramas to cover up their misdeeds.


This dude appears to be a master at this. But he may have forgotten that his efforts will not save his reputation! ::)

And you continued writing it from your alt. Similar to first time, when you wrote from your alt then you opposed the flag from your main account, now you show up from your main account, say a few words then continue from your alt, at just a few minutes distance.



This is why he opposed the flag just after you wrote here? And that's also why you popped here again just a few minutes after he said he wanted to write something then he changed his mind? He changed his mind meaning that he decided to say what he wanted to say through his alt, not from his main account?


High ranking account? Yeah, he's a hero (a "hero" spelled with "h", not "H"!)! A hero at defending scammers. In moments like this I really miss Lauda.


Yes, I am a sort of master puppeteer and I'm controlling all accounts which wrote here, excepting yours. In rest they are all my alts, right?


Seeing how dumb he is as scammer now you changed your mind and start saying you agree he is a scammer; then do the same from your main account too, right?


I just wanted to raise awareness about him as he seemed to be a scammer. In just a few days he proved himself right here to be a scammer and scammed 3 users in 3 weeks. So the purpose of the thread was correct: he seemed to be a scammer and actually proved himself to be one. What's the problem here? And you are pointing the finger at me, for starting this thread and having a scammer exposed? Are you out of your mind???


I have already explained this to you once (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61666553#msg61666553). Have you read my reply to your post? Or why do you keep writing this non-sense?



"Play" there and allow him to scam users from international section? He was not going to scam Romanians from Romanian board as (1) mostly NeuroticFish, you (Rizzrack) and I are present; and (2) he knew he won't manage to scam any of us. So he headed to international boards. This is why I started the thread: for people to be aware about him and prevent getting scammed.


So now you're talking to yourself?

---

Lol, the scammer pays so much attention to his privacy that not even the one who he dealt with deserves to see a proof of payment.

So basically because I haven't agreed with your thought logic, and because Rizzrack also didn't agree with you, your impressive detective skills have deducted that I'm an alt account of his, and using this thread to self-communicate,  well I'm sorry to dissapoint you Sherlock,  but you couldn't be further from the truth.

But hey lets put our money where our mouth is,  so since this thread is a fan of deals,  lets make a deal, I can prove that I'm not an alt account of Rizzrack, so how about a friendly wager of 0.1 BTC, escrowed of course.   I'm assuming since you already have it all figured out at this point it's easy money for you.

LOL, what a shitshow. I'm normally very hesitant to give out a negative trust and go for a neutral one but saxydev is really begging for it.
I don't see any signs of admitting any mistake from saxydev and instead attacking fellow forum members here.
Please quit that nonsense or I will re-evaluate my neutral trust and change it to negative.
Untrustworthy Accounts should to be tagged and I don't trust fraudulent trolls.

---

But you are someone's Alt Account or did you just randomly browse Bitcointalk, saw a scammer, created an Account and tried to defend him?
Ok, let's be fair you are an Alt Account and you are from the Romanian section, too.


Not only that, you are reading a lot in the Romanian section and know about saxydev shilling Pi Shitcoin.

But let's be fair.

https://i.imgur.com/SytC7YP.png

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  :P

---

Completely meaningless your suggested "proof", any of such "proof" can be faked easily.

Wrong. Re-read what I wrote above: I said I think it's so (without being certain), as he opposed the flag just after you made your first post here. And today again: he wrote that he wanted to say something then he changed his mind and 20 minutes later you appear with another post. This is a big coincidence, isn't it?

In any case, as I also wrote once more,


Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

---

Let's not. Do you think I am as imbecile as saxydev?


First of all, as I said above, it does not matter who's alt you are.
Second of all, I am not as imbecile as the scammer, to accept such lure.
Third of all, as 1miau also wisely said (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436291.msg61753214#msg61753214), there is no way in the world for you to prove in an undeniable way you are not Rizzrack's alt.

So please find someone else to make deals with, I am not saxydev.

Instead, I see that again, like Rizzrack, you throw some words then change the subject. I answered to every statement of yours, point by point. Why don't you answer to mine? I will repeat them below, highlighted, thus you can see the questions, in case you missed them.

First question

Second question

Third question

Fourth question

From the self-confession of his/her first post, s/he has declared it is an alt account and confirmed it is not of saxydev. So, it can be Rizzrack, you or me, or someone else. Need more information to verify who alt actually.

Oh really? Did Rizzrack receive negative trust for oppose the flag as well as taking part in Saxydev? If not then how you can claim that you will be tagged negatively? Those who are honest will not post from his/her alt. If anyone can't say from his main account then the person should stay in a silent mood.

At this point i think i will never received the promised TxID and Tx key
So after read some suggestions from some of member here i decided to make separate thread about my issue with saxydev
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5439659.msg61754574#msg61754574

You have a point sending straight to him would be easy and the best way. But I don't want to please others. He is not capable of keeping his own wallet safe, it is not my problem.

If someone is really interested and doing their role as part of the community, can text me and I will share it in private.

Yet nobody did it, why? Well, not even clue. Perhaps, nobody cares. They just complain in other's threads.

You made a deal with the user, it is your responsibility to provide proof of payment. Why can't you share anything publicly? Noone is asking for any personal or private info.

Feel free to PM my main account all the evidence.