Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Economics => Topic started by: 0t3p0t on February 13, 2024, 01:57:51 AM



Title: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: 0t3p0t on February 13, 2024, 01:57:51 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Yamane_Keto on February 13, 2024, 03:00:18 AM
Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are considered a high-risk investment, and no one with experience in the market will advise you to put all your money in such an investment, but to invest money that you do not need and a certain percentage in Bitcoin. If you can save $500 a month, then investing $300 in Bitcoin will be good. Bitcoin is considered an investment, so at the end of this investment it will be converted into liquidity and used either to buy a property, a car, or a production/service project. a wise investment in Bitcoin will inevitably lead to positive results on the individual level and vice versa.

There will be an increasing demand for the agricultural and food sectors, and increasing prices and profits will encourage supply, so the effect of Bitcoin will be positive if you invest intelligently.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: franky1 on February 13, 2024, 03:10:54 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

most farms are industrialised. its no longer the era of families raising kids to take over the tractor when the dad gets old.. spending years learning about toiling, sewing, spraying and harvesting
these days a company hires a guy seasonally to drive a harvester to mow 20x adjoining fields in one go, that used to be owned by 20 families. a harvester that is modern to a point even a bus driver can drive it with 1day training

we also see things that need to be picked by hand. companies have agencies that hire foreign workers to work for a season, agencies that do all the working permit stuff, and handle the transport and lodgings.. and simple training. it doesnt take much to train someone to do one job repeatedly

gone are the days where kids learn all aspects of farming from parents or go to agricultural school to be a know it all. these days its people with business studies that learn to run businesses and hire temps and a trainer(agency with a trainer on contract)

these days kids get into doing side hustles like investing because the need for them to run the family farm are gone. plus kids these days would prefer being tiktok influencers hiring lambo's for a week and filming shorts at midday, rather then waking up at dawn to dusk driving a tractor all day

filming 52 shorts of 1min length, over a week is only part time work. but yields a years worth of tiktok publishings that can earn 52 x $1k min over a year>$50k. far better pay for far less work compared to <$50k a year farming dawn til dusk


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: radjie on February 13, 2024, 04:07:48 AM
Most of the younger generation is more interested in the current digital era, they would prefer to be able to grow the money they have by investing, whether choosing deposits in banking or investing in crypto.  The younger generation's interest in the agricultural sector is of course very rare. This must of course be taken into account so that the next generation is not interrupted from being interested in investing in the agricultural sector by collaborating with traditional and modern methods. For example, they invest in crypto, the profits are extended to the agricultural sector

Previously, they also had to be able to form a community so they could work together


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Argoo on February 13, 2024, 04:51:55 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Every person needs to eat regularly and have a balanced diet for good health. And there are big problems with this, since the climate on our planet is changing dramatically due to human activity. The ambient temperature is rising quite quickly, glaciers are melting and will lead to the flooding of many areas in different parts of our planet, in others the temperature will rise so much that it will be uninhabitable. All this will significantly reduce the remaining land area processed for agriculture. Consequently, the cost of food will increase sharply.

People in the near future will look for additional opportunities to create artificial food, for example, by properly processing oil and gas, instead of wastefully burning them as fuel. Therefore, the role of food and agriculture will increase.

Finance itself is not the answer to every problem. They themselves do not create material wealth, but only redistribute the flow of money. An entire generation cannot engage in finance and investing. Because there won't be anything to eat. In this regard, I do not think that the younger generation will dramatically change anything in the employment structure of the population.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: yhiaali3 on February 13, 2024, 05:11:38 AM
Economic diversification is required. The trend of all young people investing in the crypto field and leaving other important sectors such as agriculture, food, industry, etc. will certainly have bad economic effects on countries where such a phenomenon is widespread, especially in poor countries.

Of course, most young people want to leave work in tired sectors such as agriculture and industry and go to the easier and more profitable field of cryptocurrencies, so it is the duty of society to create a kind of balance so that these sectors that are necessary for the survival of any society (I mean agriculture and food) are not displaced.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Majestic-milf on February 13, 2024, 05:33:08 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
From one angle, as more youths delve into Bitcoin, it creates more financial freedom and since most young ones value interactions made online, Bitcoin is a peer to peer technology, which enables you conduct transactions online without needing a bank to serve as an intermediary hence it fits the bill. Bitcoin is like a social innovation amongst the youths and it has given a whole new light to doing business online.
 While on the other hand, it's necessary that youths pick interest in farming and agriculture as they can be able to add a new method to farming instead of the conventional ways. They have an edge over the older ones as they can make better research on how to grow a crop and help in the growth of the economy. The importance of food can't be over stated but many youths shy away from this venture as it's regarded as menial and dirty and a waste of resources. It's easy to complain that the prices of food are high but no one wants to put in the work.
 
 I feel that the more people especially the youths decide to venture into agriculture, putting their energy and youth to good use, the mindset of others will change from agriculture being a thing for the elderly people, but I guess humans will always have a choice.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: lovesmayfamilis on February 13, 2024, 05:54:58 AM
Investing should always have a purpose. Why do people invest? To make a profit. And then many plan to do something with this profit. Creating your own business will be the right choice. Money must work. By making a cycle of profit from the source of investment into business and back, it will create very convenient conditions for farming and many industries.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Kakmakr on February 13, 2024, 05:58:15 AM
I do not agree with you.... people are drawn to activities that has to do with nature. Have you seen the documentaries about rooftop farming in urban cities? These people cultivate crops on top of buildings.

Yes, farming might change and it will become more mechanical (automated), but there will always be people with green fingers, willing to plant something to produce food and to profit from that.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: sunsilk on February 13, 2024, 05:59:21 AM
There are pros and cons for everything like if there's no new generations of farmers and crop makers then who's going to make our foods?

But sadly, can't also blame the new and younger generations today because of what the technology is bringing up to the world. Traditionally, there should be a passing on these jobs depending on the culture of each family.

Those that have farming business usually passing on the business to their younger members but what if most of their younger members don't want to become farmers anymore?

I believe that there will be a bit of problem on it but then it's gonna be solved. Technically, farming have been easier nowadays because of machineries but that's not what the newer pals see.

There's also the backyard farming and instead of going to be into the actual huge farming and producing, it's more of an aesthetic matter nowadays.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: poodle63 on February 13, 2024, 06:01:36 AM
well honestly, they could invested in automation of agriculture, i think the yield will just be as massive, though arguably crypto thrive because of its nature, rising in short term is very common with crypto meanwhile investing in agriculture will require long term period for it to make ROI and make profit further.
gen z not investing in agriculture is just them knowing that food nowadays are plentiful, so they don't have the sense of urgency with food.
only when food crisis arise it will become apparent that the need of food simply outweight the other, honestly, they could just invest in both, maybe when they got some good profit out of crypto investment, try to build agriculture business, thats the best.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: retreat on February 13, 2024, 06:16:03 AM
I don't think so, nowadays young people are also interested in getting involved in agriculture because it is a basic need for many people. However, different from the older generation, young people prefer to develop their agricultural fields using more sophisticated technology which increases the efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural fields.
But it's just that currently the government is not really focused on the agricultural sector, especially in terms of prices of agricultural products, this makes young people a little hesitant about getting involved in this industry. If only the government could care more about the welfare of farmers, perhaps more young people would join this field.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Zoomic on February 13, 2024, 06:46:01 AM
The young generation are only Interested in tech and lots of other digital assets/investments. Investing in cryptocurrency is good but what is investment without food to eat? It is actually true that a very good percentage of the youth are not Interested in farming, even the ones who were raised by parents who are farmers. This is evident in the fact that we have more young people clamouring for digital investments than people talking about farming. We only have few younger people who are passionate about farming and have tried to make farming more attractive by developing some interesting agricultural technologies to make farming less stressful and productive so the youths can embrace it.

Economic diversification is required. The trend of all young people investing in the crypto field and leaving other important sectors such as agriculture, food, industry, etc. will certainly have bad economic effects on countries where such a phenomenon is widespread, especially in poor countries.

Of course, most young people want to leave work in tired sectors such as agriculture and industry and go to the easier and more profitable field of cryptocurrencies, so it is the duty of society to create a kind of balance so that these sectors that are necessary for the survival of any society (I mean agriculture and food) are not displaced.

We are experiencing partial Scarcity of food and an increase in the prices of food and raw materials these days because most of us have neglected the agricultural sector for cryptocurrencies and other high returns investments.  We just need a balance in our society  where no sector of the economy becomes overcrowded or neglected as the case may be. With the recent advancements in agricultural technologies, I am optimistic that more young people will come to embrace farming


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: franky1 on February 13, 2024, 07:11:36 AM
We are experiencing partial Scarcity of food and an increase in the prices of food and raw materials these days because most of us have neglected the agricultural sector

we have not experienced food scarcity due to lack of kids working family farms.. industrial farming has meant kids can diversify and find other jobs in other employment sectors
food still exists.. fertile land still exists, however what is grown has changed

generations ago the UK main food staples were:
potato, swede, turnip, parsnip, carrots broccoli, brussel sprouts, cauliflower, cabbage, peas, greenbeans,
however industrialisation and international trade caused people to change their diets to things like cheap baked beans and tinned spaghettios instead of pea's and carrots and broccoli..

so farmers then looked into whats next profitable. and things like wheat and corn grew more and pea's/carrots less
wheat and corn which became hidden ingredients in processed food
even things like asparagus have changed from a luxury to a dietary desire

there are plenty of fertile fields to produce more then peoples needs. but when people start eating processed imported foods the fields then are used to then produce ingredients rather than dinner-plate vegetables.
the amount of bread consumption has increased but vegetable sales have declined
the amount of imported beans, avocado, almond milk has increased, but sales of home grown veg has declined
fields farmed just to get soy, corn syrup, rapeseed oil, has increased, but sales of home grown veg has declined

more yellows and browns are grown and less greens and reds are grown

the volume and variety has increased. but the amount of proper domestic vegetable-on-dinner-plate has decreased

when 2x400g tins of baked beans are £0.60 total for 800g. but a 800g of mixed veg is £1. then deters people from buying mixed veg. which then declines demand and causes farmers to change what they plant. they then try grabbing at the bread and almond milk market or the asparagus market

its not that there is a lack of kids interested/needed for farming, it is to do with the industrialisation of farming(thus not needing kids as after effect)


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Die_empty on February 13, 2024, 08:26:28 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think?
If you have ever been into farming you would not assume this way. Bitcoin is not the only profit-making business in the world, there are others and agriculture is one of them. I have been opportune to engage in farming and I can tell you that it gives profit within a short period. If you are blessed to have a bumper harvest, you are sure of above a hundred per cent profit. Just like every other investment, it has risk but I can vouch that it is highly profitable if you understand the business.

I don't think crypto adoption and investment will stop farmers from growing food. One needs to have money to invest in cryptocurrencies and one needs to make money through different means including farming. Investing in cryptocurrency is not a full-time job, so farmers will continue farming even when they have invested. Many crypto investors are gainfully employed in different fields.

Quote
Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Agriculture is an important sector of the economy. Neglecting the sector will affect any nation in diverse ways. It can lead to scarcity and an increase in the price of food which would cause starvation and death. It can also cause a nation to have an unfavourable balance of payment due to over-reliance on imported agricultural products. Depending on other nations agricultural produce could be used as a military or political tool against the receiving nation.         


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Jatiluhung on February 13, 2024, 09:04:07 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
In terms of long-term effects, this will clearly influence the economic strength of the next generation. Because economic strength is not only about getting big profits in investment but also in food security. And yes, young people nowadays very rarely want to enter the realm of agriculture. Because currently the profession as a farmer is really a profession that not many young people are looking at. Even parents rarely remember their children about how important agriculture is. Which concerns food security and also greening the land to make this earth free from global warming.

Nowadays everyone is more busy with how to get rich. And yes, that's not wrong and is normal. It's just that maybe we personally have to start having a hobby of planting trees or something like that. The point is that agriculture is no longer in demand as a profession. But we must be able to make agriculture a trendy hobby for young people. But to get there requires ideas, capital and good preparation. And for those of us who are still fighting for our own lives, we still don't have time to think about this. And so does everyone else.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: cryptomaniac_xxx on February 13, 2024, 09:18:06 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

I guess it's a different generation. Maybe in the last 40-50 years, those generations are looking for farming so that they will have food in the table during those times. But in this decade, it's all about investments, not just crypto but all other assets like stocks and gold or even oil and real state.

I wouldn't say that it's bad or good to our economy, again you have to look at where our generation is going. I know that there are warnings all over the place that there could be short shortage in the next 5 years or so. But with the current mindset of young generations, maybe it sounds bad, but it might not be their priorities in life. But in any case, if there are still people in rural areas that are into farming, then they might have the advantage. But still though, that is still the problem of the government on how they are going to tackle the food shortages in their country.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Arenga pinnata on February 13, 2024, 09:51:51 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
As a young generation I feel this way. I'm also more interested in investing in crypto in my current state. Because I chose crypto not because I ignored agriculture but because I really needed the crypto industry to make a profit and earn income. If I were someone who came from a rich family or from a family that had a large agricultural land, maybe I would be more involved in farming with my family. But unfortunately my family doesn't have much land that can be used as agricultural land. Because currently most of the agricultural land is controlled by large companies and we cannot do much with limited agricultural land. So we still have to struggle to find income from other sectors. And yes, one day food security will probably be thinner. And actually we can't blame anyone. Because the current conditions make it difficult for us to get involved in the agricultural sector which actually no longer brings high profits.

Animal feed prices rose rapidly but livestock meat prices remained the same and did not follow higher increases. And so did fertilizers increase rapidly, while the price of crops remained the same and did not increase much. So anyone will definitely start leaving the agricultural sector. Not because they are not interested, but because it is no longer profitable for small farmers. except for those big farmers who have a lot of land.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Wexnident on February 13, 2024, 11:15:49 AM
Well, a lot of the areas most people live in are industrialized already, so it isn't a surprise why the majority aren't interested in it. It's not crypto in general really, it's anything tech-related since in the past few decades there's been a LOT of development with regards to it, ones that you wouldn't have thought to have happened only in a decade or two (which sadly involves Tiktok).

It also doesn't help that food-related sectors are pretty much solid in terms of foundation already to the point where there's a guaranteed list of investors who would support their process and growth. I wouldn't say it's bad to the economy really, I mean any possible development in tech can also help in the development of the food industry in the future who knows. And as I said already, food industries can stand on their own already even without the interest of the younger audience, and would be able to do so in the near future as well since they're a vital part of the basic needs of a human. Assuming they'd fall simply because people are more interested in tech seems kind of over exaggerated.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: demonica on February 13, 2024, 11:32:59 AM
Investing in crypto is something anyone can do, regardless of how much money they have for investments. And of course, younger generation are mostly interested in crypto investment because of technology. Older generation tends to find it too complicated and hard to understand the basics of technology, what more if it involves investments. But for the food sector, I kinda doubt that. Even if the younger generation are getting into crypto nowadays or even in the future, food related sectors will still continue. Obviously, giant food businesses will continue their business and will pass it to their next heir/generation. So regardless if these people becomes interested in crypto or not, they will still manage and run their business in the food industry. As for farming, if you own a business operating huge farming land, there's no problem doing that. But for low income farmers, especially in cases like here in my country where they really get deprived of benefits and such, you would want to achieve more in terms of career than rely solely being a farmer.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: mu_enrico on February 13, 2024, 03:39:21 PM
For young normies, everything depends on whether or not it's profitable. They are more attracted to get-rich-quick schemes, thus farming may not be suitable for hype. But it will only be temporary after they get dumped and whatever, then they face the real world. There will be farming enthusiasts, organic farming enthusiasts, vegans, etc., and these communities/ideologies are more persistent and last longer.

Food will always be a priority since humans have to eat every day. But not everyone must take part in farming activity since it's what capitalism means. You are free to do the work that you want. And people will still do farming work as long as it's profitable.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: YOSHIE on February 13, 2024, 04:19:02 PM
There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Adopting crypto and the agricultural sector, two different things in economic problems, agriculture and food from time to time, these two things are the basis for boosting the world economy, has no impact on the younger generation who don't care about agriculture and food, even though they are 90% involved in crypto.

Researchers say 90% of those who work in agriculture and food are aged 40 and over, it's not just happening today from ancient Egyptian centuries that young people don't care about agriculture, Researchers say 90% of those who work in agriculture and food are aged 40 and over, it's not just happening today from ancient Egyptian centuries that young people don't care about agriculture.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: KennyR on February 13, 2024, 04:37:11 PM
I'm not sure of the western nations, but in my country, the younger generation has an interest in self-reliant farming, as it is believed that people will suffer for food in the future. A greater number of youngsters who were in a good position in the information technology sector have left their jobs and are getting into farming and adopting a rural lifestyle. This varies between countries, and at some point we'll experience a situation where we'll have money but we won't have food to eat. Another reason to fear about food security is the ongoing wars around the world.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: shinratensei_ on February 14, 2024, 02:56:46 AM
I'm not sure of the western nations, but in my country, the younger generation has an interest in self-reliant farming, as it is believed that people will suffer for food in the future. A greater number of youngsters who were in a good position in the information technology sector have left their jobs and are getting into farming and adopting a rural lifestyle. This varies between countries, and at some point we'll experience a situation where we'll have money but we won't have food to eat. Another reason to fear about food security is the ongoing wars around the world.
the food sector is heavily leveraging advantage of using AI, such as in many countries where they take advantage of drone scheduling fertilizing on, watering and so on using various means of advanced technology.
i think this is what people often overlook, even if the younger generation that are interested in this business aren't that many but the technology advantage presented could easily fill the gaps thus reducing the needs of manpower for the simplest task there is but of course its still not perfect yet.
there are many things need to be refined first, to make it finally become fully automated like basically a land that can grow veggies and fruit on its own without human intervention that'd be the greatest next thing ever.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: harapan on February 14, 2024, 05:22:39 AM
This is a digital era and things are changing rapidly.This generation Z is naturally social and they seem to spend most of their time socializing with family and friends.Generation Z are constantly learning,and they prefer to be with thier smartphone to any other thing.This generation are the true owners of this digital era that they wouldn't want to trade it for anything.Although,Gen Z are concerned about earning a solid income to cater for their financial future.
 
  Agriculture is a great selling point that will help grow and rapidly improve the aging economy.One of the reasons why we have been able to survive economical threats is because of agriculture,agriculture have improve our way of living by either cultivating crops for commercial purposes or for consumption.Meanwhile,the costs of living is really unaffordable and so many people are finding it difficult to operate with thier life activities.
 
Most people are cautious about thier health and wouldn't want to undergo the stress of farming.How can you tell an average adult to go and farm when he just be at the comfort of his home and earn swiftly from other online earning platforms,more especially BITCOIN.Gen Z can be in his or her house,and is now trending with more than 30 million views on TikTok, and has 17 billion views as a Youtuber.That's relatively huge,to me I think its the circulation of information and the individuals mentality.But being an online guru can be a better carrer option😀


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Gaza13 on February 14, 2024, 06:36:32 AM
We can't just rely on investment for everyday life. Of course, we also have to maintain our survival in any case, whether it's business or staying up late. In my personal opinion, investment is to fight for our money to continue working to make a profit and fight inflation. Indeed, the world of investment certainly has very big risks.

Indeed, many young people are reluctant to open businesses such as agriculture and animal husbandry because they do not want to take risks. If the younger generation does not take steps to take risks, then their lives will be wasted in old age and they will definitely continue to struggle to meet their living needs in old age.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Lucius on February 14, 2024, 11:32:15 AM
There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

In general, it is bad that society is turning more and more into system addicts, rejecting any form of self-sufficiency at the same time. Modern societies of the western world think that food falls from the sky straight into shopping centers where they just come, choose what they want and pay with their card. Unfortunately, this approach to life causes the mass production of mostly poisoned food and the destruction of the environment and drinking water.

All this has a very negative effect on people's health, and more and more sick people are just a burden for any economy, no matter how successful it is. I don't know if any of you have heard of the areas of the world called "blue zones", but that's one of the ways people should try to live because today's way of life will fall on our heads sooner or later.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: slapper on February 14, 2024, 11:47:13 AM
Younger generations' bitcoin adoption is a result of changing economic interests and technology. It has implications, though. Food security ignored? This is like playing with fire without getting burned. Take a peek at the complex economy. Cryptocurrency? Volatile and speculative. It's like building castles in the air, but it offers high profits. Food and agriculture, though? That underpins our existence. Ignoring it for digital gold is unsafe

Trouble awaits young minds leaving agriculture. Food security is the issue. Economy and society collapse without food. The verdict? A serious oversight. Need balance. Yes, promote crypto innovation, but not at the expense of our survival. Securing our economic and nutritional future is important


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: davis196 on February 14, 2024, 11:49:33 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Why does it have to be a "this or that" type of choice? Can the younger generations be interested in both crypto and farming?
I don't see any contradiction between the cryptocurrency world and the agriculture sector. Why would anyone have to abandon completely the crypto world is favor of farming and vice versa? Some young people will be more interested in crypto, while others will be more interested in farming. What do you mean by "food security might not be a priority"? Do you think that the next generations won't eat food or something. ;D I'm sure that in the human civilization, there will always be people, who are interested in farming and agriculture.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: icalical on February 14, 2024, 12:29:12 PM
The fear of lack of farmer to grow food has been exist for many decades, Industrial revolution, technological revolution, Internet, and now crypto. But it has been proven that we still eat until now, and there is still food circulating in the world, not to mention that tons of food is wasted everyday. The improvement in the agriculture industry and the advancement in technology in fact help farmers to produce foods more effectively, so even with less number of farmers the food is still enough. The problem is not in the amount of food, it is the uneven distribution. There are ton of food wasted in the rich country while there are some people in poor countries that can't eat regularly every day.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Faisal2202 on February 14, 2024, 08:24:54 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Not all 5 fingers are equal, and there is a term diversity in biology studies, which tells us that the world's nature can't be the same. Considering that, if out of 5/10 youngsters are interested in crypto (which is so imaginative BTW) then the remaining ones might be doing something else, some might be farming, or instead of farming (specifically) they are planning to become doctors, engineers, pilots etc. Not everyone wants to be involved in crypto but in future, they might have to.

But they might not adopt it as full time career, they have to use crypto as people use Gold nowadays to hold the value of there money for longer period of time. And yeah, I do agree with you on one thing that, either you have adopted the crypto a long time ago while the OP is talking about those youngester or people who still not adopted but planning to come into this field, you should start doing some practical work.

I went to a friends house, and his father was giving a good advice that with work, we should focus on physical selfs of ours. We should also do something that keeps us fits and also give benefit to the community around us.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: sekalitas on February 15, 2024, 08:06:39 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

In my country, farming often carries the unfortunate stereotype of being a low-income, poverty-stricken job. This negative image, coupled with challenges like selling crops, dissuades many young people from considering it. The allure of technology, with its promise of comfortable workplaces and potentially quick financial gains (though not without risks), further amplifies this disconnect.

However, this lack of interest in agriculture can have serious economic consequences. Food is a fundamental human need, and its demand constantly rises. If supply dwindles due to declining farming participation, we face a potential food security crisis in the future.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Die_empty on February 15, 2024, 08:56:45 AM
The fear of lack of farmer to grow food has been exist for many decades, Industrial revolution, technological revolution, Internet, and now crypto. But it has been proven that we still eat until now, and there is still food circulating in the world, not to mention that tons of food is wasted everyday. The improvement in the agriculture industry and the advancement in technology in fact help farmers to produce foods more effectively, so even with less number of farmers the food is still enough. The problem is not in the amount of food, it is the uneven distribution. There are ton of food wasted in the rich country while there are some people in poor countries that can't eat regularly every day.
The introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the agricultural sector has improved food production to a large extent. Farmers can now produce more with fewer resources because of these technological organisms. Technological advanced agricultural tools are also contributing to the increase in food production. A report (https://www.feedingamerica.org/our-work/reduce-food-waste#:~:text=How%20much%20food%20goes%20to,all%20the%20food%20in%20America.) stated that the US wastes about $444 billion worth of food annually which is about 149 billion meals.

However, there has been some criticism of these GMOs from the health sector. Some health practitioners have claimed that these plants and animals have some negative health implications. These health personnel are encouraging people to consume natural or organic foods instead of inorganic agricultural produce.   

Poor countries have fertile lands and enough manpower. But they lack technology and finance and some of them are plagued with wars and conflicts. The majority of farmers in developing nations rely on crude implements and most of them do not have access to finance to buy good seedlings, fertilizer, chemicals, etc.   


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: crwth on February 15, 2024, 09:03:08 AM
I initially thought of farming, as yield farming or something related to that and I have to re-read the post to understand it. It might be just me lol.

Anyway, In terms of technology, they would probably be more inclined to that cryptocurrency adaptation because it's easier compared to actual farming. Maybe in the future, they will be applying what they have learned in cryptocurrency to actual farming/food-related services and making it more efficient.

I'm curious, what made you ask this post? It's not that relevant TBH.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Stepstowealth on February 15, 2024, 10:32:18 AM
There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think?
Interest In farming and food related sectors is not high because the government has not made it attractive for the younger generations to want to get involve, and because cryptocurrency investments offer a better chance of getting rich, young people focus there.
If the government of some countries that have land to farm can create incentives and offers that are attractive, many young people will refocus back their interest in the food sector.
The government can offer lands to people willing to farm, provide fertilizers and pesticides, as well as regularly visit these farmers to teach them new things and introduce them to new products and tools to make sure that their products are standard, offer to buy the products from the farmers to eliminate the worry of customer to buy, provide loans and grants to farmers when needed and other things like this, they may be able to attract the younger generations to farming and the food sector.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: pooya87 on February 15, 2024, 01:47:34 PM
There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors.
I'm assuming by "getting interests on" you mean "investing in and making an interest" not "being interested in".

I have to say, it is not an age related matter. People tend to make an investment in something that gives the most amount of profit. Farms and some of the food related sectors are not the most profitable (although exceptions apply) so it is natural for people to be interested in more high risk high reward investments such as cryptocurrencies.

What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Of course it is bad. Because the food sector is not something that anybody can afford neglecting and it every country there are a large number of people working in that sector making a living with a lot of hardship.
If it is neglected, we see the same mess as Europe these days with farmers protesting all across Europe because they can not afford living with the worsening economic situation and the way the governments are neglecting them and worse in some cases passing laws that hurts them the most.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Spaceman1000$ on February 15, 2024, 02:33:21 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
People are gifted in investing in various ways, over the years I have learned to understand that food production or farming is majorly an investment that is hereditary base, most farmers that are in large scale farming and mechanized farming always inherit some of their farms from either their parents or their grandparents who have over time been predominantly farmers. So the production of food over the years will always be there, people will always invest in farming.
cryptocurrency and bitcoin is a new innovation that people are diving into but it will not replace or give divided attention on people that are into farming.
However there are young entrepreneurs that are into livestock farming, food production, animal husbandry and a whole lot more on food processing. food is an essential component of the human race, so at every point in time, you will always see people that are into food production no matter the age whether they are young or old.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: dothebeats on February 15, 2024, 11:21:08 PM
I see this as becoming a reality. A lot of millennials and Gen Zs in my workplace are always talking about investments in the stock market and cryptocurrencies. None of them are really interested in acquiring lands or real estate anymore because they believe that it includes a lot of work which, in their opinion, is not worth it since you'll be spending time that equates to money. Buying farmlands is one of my ultimate goals eventually because it will always have value. You will always have the land even if harvest season doesn't go well. Plus, you'll get to help solve the food security issue that most of the younger people don't know about.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: uneng on February 15, 2024, 11:45:12 PM
Farming sector is already dominated by few landowners who control vast portions of lands. Even if the young generations wished to become farmers, they would have to conform being small land owners, without the possibility of making huge profit, unlike their competitors. So, it's definitely not an option for new generations to go for it. The world is heavily centralized in few hands, and everyone else has to find gaps on this system to survive and thrive.

Then alternatives such working on informatics field, and adopting smart technological investments such as Bitcoin become interesting options for these folks when drawing their futures. And even if youngs have interest for farming matters, I believe there are many farming simulators around on the internet they can play and "feel" how it is to be a profitable farmer... We live in the age of artificiality, so it's "natural" artificial solutions are put in practice to fulfill the desires of the young generations.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Sanitough on February 15, 2024, 11:55:02 PM
This is already expected from these younger generation since majority of them have more passion on technology and innovations rather than focused on agriculture related investments. I’d say this is not actually bad for our economy but if all these people will put all their eggs in one basket, that would mean they’re all susceptible to losses, thus putting their finances at risk. So my suggestion is to instead diversify their funds into cryptocurrency and agriculture. That will probably create a more profitable and productive outcome.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: 0t3p0t on February 17, 2024, 06:20:52 AM
I'm curious, what made you ask this post? It's not that relevant TBH.
One of the reason why I ask everyone about this is that younger generations were interested more on the trend of technology I mean blockchain especially when we are to mention about NFT games, cryptocurrency investment and any other crypto related income generating activities they are more active in all this. Second they are more interested in information technology course in colleges than agriculture courses.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: shield132 on February 17, 2024, 08:23:59 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
There are fewer people in agriculture because parents push their sons and daughters to enter university, study medicine, engineering, law, informational technologies and move to cities for a higher quality of life. At the same time, in developed countries it is getting expensive to buy land and start farming, some people don't have any other choice.
The young generation tries to adopt cryptocurrencies and invest in it because it is an innovation and innovations always pay well. When this market will become saturated, people will be forced to find a different niche. We also have to keep in mind that the science of agriculture is improving and it's getting easier to farm and have a good harvest with less involvement of mankind.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Egii Nna on February 17, 2024, 09:38:18 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

I think this will definitely increase hunger around the globe because if everyone focuses on cryptocurrency investment, who will then invest in farming? Nobody, meaning scarcity of food will be on trend because the supply of food is less than the demand, which means everyone will get rich while everything will be expensive, and those living in the low-income global region will end up suffering and even more severe complications, which is death. To me, it is very bad for the economy. 

The best idea is just simple. Even though I know younger people of this generation find it hard to work with energy, the present farming sector also deals with technology, so investing in both sites is not bad but will only increase your profit because after investing in cryptocurrency, the profit you gain instead of investing all that back in crypto again, you should share it in two places so that you can invest half in the farming sector and half in cryptocurrency since both of them are investments that will bring profit at the end of the day.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: dezoel on February 18, 2024, 06:51:53 PM
I do not agree with you.... people are drawn to activities that has to do with nature. Have you seen the documentaries about rooftop farming in urban cities? These people cultivate crops on top of buildings.

Yes, farming might change and it will become more mechanical (automated), but there will always be people with green fingers, willing to plant something to produce food and to profit from that.
He only said younger generations which I think I can agree with, because we know kids nowadays right?
We can usually see them with their iPads and cell phones on but for us who grow up in the 0's, 90's, and lower, we are into classical stuffs, anyway the OP is only talking about investing which means new generations can still be able to get interested on farming like they will plant it because it makes their soundings great.

When we have a money we can use it to secure a food, so farming to get a food can only be optional but if we lack in budget it can be a good idea, and another benefits here is we can get fresh foods anytime we like.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: el kaka22 on February 18, 2024, 07:15:43 PM
These type of investments are not mutually exclusive. You could have a farmer who also invests into NFT's and cryptos as well. I believe that the farming and ranching world will keep going for a long time, without a doubt and we should see them make a lot of money in the future.

Maybe not as ineffective as it used to be and some higher technology system will be figured out eventually, we do not have enough lands and farmers today, so we need to figure out a way to make more crops with less land and less farmers, but eventually it will get better. These same people could also take their profit from it, and buy bitcoin as well, just because that looks more promising, doesn't mean that they have to do only bitcoin investment.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: bbigtart on February 19, 2024, 09:07:02 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
There are fewer people in agriculture because parents push their sons and daughters to enter university, study medicine, engineering, law, informational technologies and move to cities for a higher quality of life. At the same time, in developed countries it is getting expensive to buy land and start farming, some people don't have any other choice.
The young generation tries to adopt cryptocurrencies and invest in it because it is an innovation and innovations always pay well. When this market will become saturated, people will be forced to find a different niche. We also have to keep in mind that the science of agriculture is improving and it's getting easier to farm and have a good harvest with less involvement of mankind.
Now many young people dream of becoming YouTubers or want to become skilled traders and want to invest in cryptocurrencies. So it is not only agricultural regeneration that is threatened, so are livestock farmers and other sectors, although the data is not yet significant. It must be acknowledged that food security is very important for a country to survive and every country must have food security, so it is very clear that food security has a big influence on a country's economy, especially for the younger generation.

However, unfortunately the younger generation is less interested in agriculture because one of the strong reasons is welfare. Many farmers should be prosperous, but in reality this is not the case. And the mindset of farmers who tend to be 'poor' makes the younger generation work more in the service sector and adopt cryptocurrency.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: ARTOIS on February 19, 2024, 10:26:32 AM

The crypto sector is new for everyone, and we are at the beginning of the revolution in the world of digital currencies, and many changes will occur in the future.

As for the interest of young people and the rising generation in trading and investing in crypto, I believe that this is not a reason for neglecting the rest of the specializations, and it will not harm the economy, as we have previously neglected many sectors, such as health, in the time of Corona, and the only thing that negatively affects the economy is wars.

We cannot all be doctors, professors, or investors. There is a doctor, a pilot, a cleaning engineer, a farmer...


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: kryptqnick on February 19, 2024, 12:13:22 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Perhaps it depends on a country and on area (rural vs urban). If agriculture isn't big in a country, I don't see why people would see it as a good investment option there. If people live in urban areas, I also think it's unlikely that they'd buy a farm or something like that. Also, let's not forget that crypto investment doesn't require a minimum, whereas buying a farm requires a certain amount of money, which can make it unaffordable to many young people.
But if it's a rural area and a country with rich land where you can actually grow lots of veggies, having your own little area and growing food can be a major source of income or just a direct source of food. That being said, younger generations do often try to move to bigger cities and make it in other economic sectors, even if they grew up in rural areas.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: xSkylarx on February 19, 2024, 12:53:50 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Not all, but for sure the majority, because younger generations are more exposed to tech, meaning in the online world they are always on their gadgets, and they know how high risk and high reward crypto is, and they are just thinking that they can earn it at their own comfort in their homes. But there are young people who are into farming because they grow with it like their parents taught them, meaning they want to do it as well but  with the advancement of technology, younger people want it more than doing the dirty work.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: mammusu on February 19, 2024, 04:01:42 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Not all, but for sure the majority, because younger generations are more exposed to tech, meaning in the online world they are always on their gadgets, and they know how high risk and high reward crypto is, and they are just thinking that they can earn it at their own comfort in their homes. But there are young people who are into farming because they grow with it like their parents taught them, meaning they want to do it as well but  with the advancement of technology, younger people want it more than doing the dirty work.
The accessibility and convenience of online platforms make it tempting for young individuals to explore the opportunities from the comfort of their homes, especially given the potential for significant financial gains. But there are still young people who are deeply connected to traditional occupations like farming, often stemming from family legacies and cultural ties. These individuals may have been raised in farming communities and have a strong affinity for agricultural practices passed down through generations.

There remains a segment of the younger generation that values the physical labor and connection to the land inherent in farming, while advancements in technology have indeed revolutionized various industries, including agriculture. Both paths offer unique opportunities and challenges, and the choice between them often reflects individual interests, values, and circumstances. As society continues to evolve, the world needs to respect the diverse career paths and aspirations of the younger generation.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Casalania on February 19, 2024, 04:13:15 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
I don't think it will effect the economy. The younger generation is not only focused on investments like crypto. There are many young people who are exposed to technology and are dedicated to inventing and developing new technologies and machines. These innovations are aimed at making it simpler and easier for humans to do heavy work, such as farming and any food-related productions.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Lorence.xD on February 19, 2024, 05:20:57 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Well, nothing's bad if they know what they are doing. Indeed other industries are as well profitable but this is their preference, assuming that it is. Eitherway, risk will be present no matter what investment you engage yourself with. Agriculture and food industries are a bit saturated at this point and introducing your own brand is way difficult than ever, so I cannot blame the young ones if they will choose what's new as long as it will be beneficial for them. Younger gens in the first place are the ones following technological advancements which makes it not surprising. Ore industries also, are now considering blockchain adoption which is a good thing to consider if you're looking forward with long term progress.
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Perhaps it depends on a country and on area (rural vs urban). If agriculture isn't big in a country, I don't see why people would see it as a good investment option there. If people live in urban areas, I also think it's unlikely that they'd buy a farm or something like that. Also, let's not forget that crypto investment doesn't require a minimum, whereas buying a farm requires a certain amount of money, which can make it unaffordable to many young people.
But if it's a rural area and a country with rich land where you can actually grow lots of veggies, having your own little area and growing food can be a major source of income or just a direct source of food. That being said, younger generations do often try to move to bigger cities and make it in other economic sectors, even if they grew up in rural areas.
Valid point as well. Culture and environment highly affects the interest and choices of the younger gens. It also speaks for appropriation such that if you are in a country or area that agriculture is most of the time, the source of living, then kids at a young age would more likely engage with the same industry. Perhaps with OPs country, technological advancements are more evident. As long as it shows progressive development no matter what industry it is, I'd say things are still fine for the new ones. What matters is the ct of engaging with a field of their interest.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Argoo on March 11, 2024, 02:12:54 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
I don't think it will effect the economy. The younger generation is not only focused on investments like crypto. There are many young people who are exposed to technology and are dedicated to inventing and developing new technologies and machines. These innovations are aimed at making it simpler and easier for humans to do heavy work, such as farming and any food-related productions.
With the advent of cryptocurrency in the world in general and in the economic sphere in particular, nothing much will change. Cryptocurrency does not create material wealth, does not increase the volume of manufactured products and food products. Cryptocurrency only slightly redistributes financial flows. At the same time, the population of our planet is increasing, and due to sudden climate change, the volume of agricultural land is decreasing. If the younger generation can eat less, then perhaps they will choose finance as a priority, including more involvement in cryptocurrency. But this is unlikely to happen directly on the scale of an entire generation.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: bitzizzix on March 11, 2024, 02:38:45 PM
In my opinion, this is because many farmers do not want their children not to become farmers for various reasons. And they prefer to direct or want their children to go to college to become government employees, office workers, engineers, doctors, police and so on. Because they consider it more prosperous than the agricultural sector, their parents want their children to be much better than their fathers.
And I think this is one of the reasons because the younger generation is still being educated by their parents who work as farmers so that they can be better than them. Because they feel the truth and think that if they become farmers they will not be prosperous, and will not be far from poverty or living hand to mouth.
Moreover, with advances in technology, many young people do not want to be left behind, including investing in digital currency which they use as an alternative opportunity to make money.

And what I said is a fact and most of it is like that, it's different if the new generation wants it for themselves.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: poodle63 on March 11, 2024, 02:45:02 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
I don't think it will effect the economy. The younger generation is not only focused on investments like crypto. There are many young people who are exposed to technology and are dedicated to inventing and developing new technologies and machines. These innovations are aimed at making it simpler and easier for humans to do heavy work, such as farming and any food-related productions.
exactly the younger generation are definitely focusing on developing technology to grow the yield, its not like most people aren't interested in farming but people who are interested in farming nowadays are very committed one they will try to integrate technology into their farming to increase the yield.
such as utilizing drone for fertilizer for their plants and so on there are certainly many way where we can integrate technology into the agriculture and farming in general.
younger generation definitely interested more in the developing technology though since if there's technology invented then it could increase more yield and that means
much more money than previously using rather traditional method.
i've seen in various countries they even use UV light to double productivity of dragon fruit.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Plaguedeath on March 11, 2024, 02:48:18 PM
In my opinion, this is because many farmers do not want their children not to become farmers for various reasons. And they prefer to direct or want their children to go to college to become government employees, office workers, engineers, doctors, police and so on. Because they consider it more prosperous than the agricultural sector, their parents want their children to be much better than their fathers.
And I think this is one of the reasons because the younger generation is still being educated by their parents who work as farmers so that they can be better than them. Because they feel the truth and think that if they become farmers they will not be prosperous, and will not be far from poverty or living hand to mouth.
Moreover, with advances in technology, many young people do not want to be left behind, including investing in digital currency which they use as an alternative opportunity to make money.

And what I said is a fact and most of it is like that, it's different if the new generation wants it for themselves.
Look at the bright side, it means there will be a lot supply in government employees, office workers, engineers etc. This will make the entity can decrease the salary because they know there are a lot people wants this job.

On the other hands, no one is interested with agricultural sector, so this will make foods price increase and they can make higher profit because the foods is scarce when there are a lot people want to feed themselves.

It's always supply and demand.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Gormicsta on March 11, 2024, 03:19:18 PM
Most of the younger generation is more interested in the current digital era, they would prefer to be able to grow the money they have by investing, whether choosing deposits in banking or investing in crypto.  The younger generation's interest in the agricultural sector is of course very rare. This must of course be taken into account so that the next generation is not interrupted from being interested in investing in the agricultural sector by collaborating with traditional and modern methods. For example, they invest in crypto, the profits are extended to the agricultural sector

Previously, they also had to be able to form a community so they could work together

To make cryptocurrency investments work for the agriculture industry, we must establish a system that resembles an efficiently functioning machine. Here's how it might work:

1. A cryptocurrency fund is established to invest in the blockchain relies agriculture ventures such as tracking options for the distribution of food or innovative agricultural equipment.

2. The younger investors place their financial resources in the fund, recognizing that their donations are helping to develop the agricultural industry and may boost returns.

3. The fund's assets provides frequent updates to investors on the status and impact of agricultural investments, thereby boosting confidence and openness. To grab the desire of the younger generation in agriculture, we must also find a method to make it appealing and meaningful.



Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Wakate on March 11, 2024, 03:43:33 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
In as much as everyone of use has what we are doing that is giving us funds, we keep to keep doing it. Everyone has there own line of duty and we don't have to bother much about that. We all going to eat and food will be sufficient because there are people that are ready to farm to have money to pay bills and do other things. We have different roles we play so we don't need to be afraid of food security. The government is in charge and is going to determine whether the law enforcement support food sufficiency.

 Just like we have been seeing different news about farmers laments of high price of agricultural material and fertilizer necessary for farming and becoming more expensive and the government is come up with high inflation that is affecting the production of food supply.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: jrrsparkles on March 11, 2024, 03:59:50 PM
Food farming and processing always has potential but no more for the retail farmers, already big companies started taking over every part and if I am not wrong the shift already happened many decades back or atleast where I am living, now only who are rich do it as hobby not really as a business.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Juse14 on March 11, 2024, 04:23:57 PM
Agriculture and the food industry must continue because we all need to eat. However, it is very unfortunate that the reality of farmer regeneration continues to decline, because the younger generation is reluctant to enter the world of agriculture, even though if you look closely, businesses in the agricultural and food sectors are quite promising. Meanwhile, when we talk about investment in crypto or bitcoin, we are talking about the long term and the future. but when we talk about agriculture, we are talking about today and the future. Investment in Bitcoin should be a sideline to increase income alone, while agriculture should be our main priority. And young people must be aware of the current situation, where the food crisis is occurring and hunger is occurring everywhere, the agricultural and food industries really need their (young people) presence. and we need to remember, that no matter how much money we have, if there is no food then the money we have has no meaning at all.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: electronicash on March 11, 2024, 04:42:54 PM
I'm curious, what made you ask this post? It's not that relevant TBH.
One of the reason why I ask everyone about this is that younger generations were interested more on the trend of technology I mean blockchain especially when we are to mention about NFT games, cryptocurrency investment and any other crypto related income generating activities they are more active in all this. Second they are more interested in information technology course in colleges than agriculture courses.

the hype and the influence of the people online are just much more convincing to the newer generation that they would rather be investing in crypto than trying to take care of old dad's agriculture business.

the poor families are willing to cultivate lands though. i'm sure they are willing to work for the agricultural land to farm for the rich. it's still important to produce wheat, rice, and corn not just or the business but ffor consumption.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: tsaroz on March 11, 2024, 05:06:27 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Both of these statements are true but they are not inter related.
Crypto as investment is growing and might grow in the same rate but there's going to be a limit where you can't just pump but create produce that may bring value.
There would be young people in production sector but agriculture is not going to be as popular.
Agriculture is something that still can be industrialized to large scale. With AI, AI operated robots and testing of crops for deficiency and finding out the minerals, pesticides they need can be automated. Just with a few people monitoring it, all of the labour could be done by robots. And with decreasin fertility rate, there's no other way as the farming lands would be huge while manpower would be low. And with decrease in number of people hungry for food, the demand too would decrease.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: tiCeR on March 11, 2024, 05:32:04 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

I had to think twice while I was getting started with my answer. I don't even know whether investments in the agricultural sector are that feasible for young people who are looking into potential investments. It is probably not a sector that will keep growing for a long time as I believe at some point in time genetic technology will play a bigger role than it already does today.

Do you subsume any food production technologies under your so called farming and food related sectors? I assume yes and I think that's where things could become interesting again. Any advanced technology will be driven by younger generations at some point. Probably AI would take over when it comes to developing safe and effective genetic technologies.

After all, supply and demand will rule the (investment) markets and of course accessibility of these markets. At the moment my impression is that agricultural sectors are purely dominated by giants like Bill Gates and massive companies. They live off of the dividends whereas younger people look for investments that still have a lot of potential to grow. If it is about experimental technologies and breakthroughs, it's different as we have seen with some startups that exploded during the COVID crisis.

But in the agricultural sector, someone like Bill Gates owns so much that it is not important to him whether the share price increases. He makes billions from dividends alone, no matter whether the shares drop in price or increase price, whether there is a food crisis or not.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Baki202 on March 11, 2024, 06:15:43 PM

The crypto sector is new for everyone, and we are at the beginning of the revolution in the world of digital currencies, and many changes will occur in the future.

As for the interest of young people and the rising generation in trading and investing in crypto, I believe that this is not a reason for neglecting the rest of the specializations, and it will not harm the economy, as we have previously neglected many sectors, such as health, in the time of Corona, and the only thing that negatively affects the economy is wars.

We cannot all be doctors, professors, or investors. There is a doctor, a pilot, a cleaning engineer, a farmer...
True that the crypto world is taking over, the world is changing and it is accepting Bitcoin. The world as a whole is accepting it gradually and a lot of young people are turning to Bitcoin. There is truth in the fact that it will affect the production of food but Bitcoin does not stop anyone from investing, and because we have fewer farmers, that is also contributing to the scarcity of food because everyone doesn't want to be called a farmer, forgetting that farmers are the ones that have money now. After all, we have fewer farmers and once we do, we make money. If I had money, farming is something I would want to do.

And I know that we all can not do crypto. No matter how the world embraces it, people will still add other hustle to it because we all know how crypto works. Depending on it fully is a risk on its own so even farmers can be encouraged to trade.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: irsykes on March 11, 2024, 06:56:38 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

I had to think twice while I was getting started with my answer. I don't even know whether investments in the agricultural sector are that feasible for young people who are looking into potential investments. It is probably not a sector that will keep growing for a long time as I believe at some point in time genetic technology will play a bigger role than it already does today.

Do you subsume any food production technologies under your so called farming and food related sectors? I assume yes and I think that's where things could become interesting again. Any advanced technology will be driven by younger generations at some point. Probably AI would take over when it comes to developing safe and effective genetic technologies.

After all, supply and demand will rule the (investment) markets and of course accessibility of these markets. At the moment my impression is that agricultural sectors are purely dominated by giants like Bill Gates and massive companies. They live off of the dividends whereas younger people look for investments that still have a lot of potential to grow. If it is about experimental technologies and breakthroughs, it's different as we have seen with some startups that exploded during the COVID crisis.

But in the agricultural sector, someone like Bill Gates owns so much that it is not important to him whether the share price increases. He makes billions from dividends alone, no matter whether the shares drop in price or increase price, whether there is a food crisis or not.
Certainly there are young people entering minority roles which could be a good investment in agriculture. The field of agricultural investment does require energy and mental power, discipline to develop. If we take these two categories, people can be successful if they understand algorithmic material. In the modern era, most young people are looking for investments that are not too risky, such as the crypto world, if you know the basic knowledge, this can be the main object


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: MissNonFall9 on March 12, 2024, 06:47:38 AM
Information technology has reduced human effort. So now people want to stay far away from physical work. As the global climate is constantly changing, the tendency to produce crops is decreasing day by day. However, due to the impact of technology in the field of agriculture, production has increased significantly with less effort and time. As the young generation is technologically dependent and technological development is very high, a large part of the next generation of people are into cryptocurrencies
I strongly believe that there is a strong possibility of self-involvement. Therefore, investment, industry,  or business will play a key role in changing the economic situation of any country. But the agricultural sector will never disappear completely. In that case, alternatives may emerge in the food sector.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: $anounimus$ on March 12, 2024, 08:38:29 AM
Information technology has reduced human effort. So now people want to stay far away from physical work. As the global climate is constantly changing, the tendency to produce crops is decreasing day by day. However, due to the impact of technology in the field of agriculture, production has increased significantly with less effort and time. As the young generation is technologically dependent and technological development is very high, a large part of the next generation of people are into cryptocurrencies
I strongly believe that there is a strong possibility of self-involvement. Therefore, investment, industry,  or business will play a key role in changing the economic situation of any country. But the agricultural sector will never disappear completely. In that case, alternatives may emerge in the food sector.
Even though technology has developed quite quickly, the food sector still cannot be left behind. There will be some young people who will see the prospects in agricultural land by using technology to make work easier. I think not all young people will prefer an instant path through crypto investment. It is also impossible for the younger generation to do everything the same and of course they are also thinking about how to develop themselves and also things that can revive their economy.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Reatim on March 12, 2024, 09:08:32 AM
It definitely depends on what kind of environment the kid grew up on. Most
kids who grew up around farms and agricultural fields are most likely to pursue
The same path. But we need to note that we are now in the digital era and being
interested in technology is never a bad thing especially one like crypto

I think there will still be a few kids who would be interested in other sectors
So as long as there are some kids interested in the agricultural industry, then it will not affect the economy badly even if most would be into crypto

Besides I think crypto can actually enhance the agricultural sector more these are two things I think can both overlap


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: DabsPoorVersion on March 12, 2024, 10:27:59 AM
It definitely depends on what kind of environment the kid grew up on. Most
kids who grew up around farms and agricultural fields are most likely to pursue
The same path. But we need to note that we are now in the digital era and being
interested in technology is never a bad thing especially one like crypto

I think there will still be a few kids who would be interested in other sectors
So as long as there are some kids interested in the agricultural industry, then it will not affect the economy badly even if most would be into crypto

Besides I think crypto can actually enhance the agricultural sector more these are two things I think can both overlap
Or I guess we can say that it depends on the country where you reside. In our country, the younger generation who grew up with their parents whose jobs are related to agriculture are not interested in continuing their culture of learning agricultural jobs.  Since we are in a digital era, most of them have different plans to have a better life than they grow old doing the same thing with their parents.

This situation has been the result for a lot of reasons, for example, the lack of support from the government, or most of the time, the businessman takes advantage of the farmers with their products to have more profit than being fair with them.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Kelward on March 12, 2024, 11:02:08 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

The crypto investment sector is different from the agricultural sector, I don't think that crypto investment can stop anybody from engaging in any other work, like agriculture, it's an investment that you can engage in and still do your regular day job. Except perhaps crypto trading that requires special skills like learning fundamental and technical analysis, the investment part is basically to hodle and monitor the market trends to know when to sale and buy.

I think that why the younger generation might be more inclined in crypto and other internet related jobs is because they don't want to get their hands dirty, they prefer a job that doesn't require manual labor, just technical skills that they can stay in a comfortable place and do, unlike the food sector where they need to engage in manual labor to get their job done. Another reason could be as earlier mentioned, crypto investment gives them chance to engage in other things including agriculture.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: tiCeR on March 12, 2024, 04:25:47 PM
...

I had to think twice while I was getting started with my answer. I don't even know whether investments in the agricultural sector are that feasible for young people who are looking into potential investments. It is probably not a sector that will keep growing for a long time as I believe at some point in time genetic technology will play a bigger role than it already does today.

Do you subsume any food production technologies under your so called farming and food related sectors? I assume yes and I think that's where things could become interesting again. Any advanced technology will be driven by younger generations at some point. Probably AI would take over when it comes to developing safe and effective genetic technologies.

After all, supply and demand will rule the (investment) markets and of course accessibility of these markets. At the moment my impression is that agricultural sectors are purely dominated by giants like Bill Gates and massive companies. They live off of the dividends whereas younger people look for investments that still have a lot of potential to grow. If it is about experimental technologies and breakthroughs, it's different as we have seen with some startups that exploded during the COVID crisis.

But in the agricultural sector, someone like Bill Gates owns so much that it is not important to him whether the share price increases. He makes billions from dividends alone, no matter whether the shares drop in price or increase price, whether there is a food crisis or not.
Certainly there are young people entering minority roles which could be a good investment in agriculture. The field of agricultural investment does require energy and mental power, discipline to develop. If we take these two categories, people can be successful if they understand algorithmic material. In the modern era, most young people are looking for investments that are not too risky, such as the crypto world, if you know the basic knowledge, this can be the main object

Quote
In the modern era, most young people are looking for investments that are not too risky, such as the crypto world,...

Lol, I am not certain how exactly you meant this sentence. A generalization à la "the crypto world" is not risky really made me laugh man! If you said that BTC can be a safe investment compared to other investments outside the crypto world, I would agree if we presume that someone doesn't go bonkers and sells his wife's marriage ring (like someone here on the forum said) or takes a loan and goes all in being neck deep in the water financially. Throwing this sentence out there that "the crypto world" is not risky, that's ridiculous!

It also doesn't make sense because where is reward there is risk, that is how it is. But it's true that this ratio "risk-reward" was skewed in favor of those who studied BTC early and understood it better than others. Indeed, those people came to the conclusion that the risk-reward ratio of BTC outcompetes all the ratios of any other investment opportunities. But since I believe that your "crypto world" includes all these altcoins, then I can only say that they are damn risky and that the risk-reward ratio is so bad that your statement they would "not be too risky" is plainly false.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: boty on March 12, 2024, 07:41:34 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
The crypto investment sector is different from the agricultural sector, I don't think that crypto investment can stop anybody from engaging in any other work, like agriculture, it's an investment that you can engage in and still do your regular day job. Except perhaps crypto trading that requires special skills like learning fundamental and technical analysis, the investment part is basically to hodle and monitor the market trends to know when to sale and buy.

I think that why the younger generation might be more inclined in crypto and other internet related jobs is because they don't want to get their hands dirty, they prefer a job that doesn't require manual labor, just technical skills that they can stay in a comfortable place and do, unlike the food sector where they need to engage in manual labor to get their job done. Another reason could be as earlier mentioned, crypto investment gives them chance to engage in other things including agriculture.
Yes, of course these two things are very different and those who choose to invest in crypto can of course still do other jobs that can give them income from that job and if they choose to work in the agricultural sector of course this is very good because they can besides being able to meet their own food needs can also be profitable for them if they can do it on a large scale.

Today's young generation will be more interested in work that doesn't require a lot of energy and they want a job with the skills they have, such as choosing to do work related to the internet and they can earn income from the skills they have.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: lixer on March 13, 2024, 05:09:42 PM
the hype and the influence of the people online are just much more convincing to the newer generation that they would rather be investing in crypto than trying to take care of old dad's agriculture business.

the poor families are willing to cultivate lands though. i'm sure they are willing to work for the agricultural land to farm for the rich. it's still important to produce wheat, rice, and corn not just or the business but ffor consumption.
We don't need to forget that everyone in the world don't have access to the online world, there are places in the world I can take you where people don't even know what the internet is, if you ask them anything about online stuff, they wouldn't know because they don't have access to such things and such are the people who would work in industries such as agriculture or any other that requires manual attention.

So, I don't think that a part of the new generation is more interested in online businesses and investments would disrupt a whole economy because there will always be people willing to take over each sector and business because they only know about it and not other things that might be easier but those aren't for them.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Ben Barubal on March 13, 2024, 10:29:59 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Because that depends on the budget that an individual investor has, of course you will adjust it where you are more comfortable, and you will not let your other expenses be
affected just because of an investment that you want to make.

It's a matter of financial management that is needed, and at the same time, proper time management is also what we need to do in order to do that properly.



Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Zanab247 on March 15, 2024, 12:18:27 PM
Quote from: lovesmayfamilis
Investing should always have a purpose. Why do people invest? To make a profit. And then many plan to do something with this profit. Creating your own business will be the right choice. Money must work. By making a cycle of profit from the source of investment into business and back, it will create very convenient conditions for farming and many industries.
And the purpose of investing should be profit making, which is the reason people look for a good asset in the market to invest their money and have hope of earning from the investment when bull run come and it will be a good decision to carry out your research before conclude your choice.

Once you have the money on ground and you also have the skills in that particular business you are about to start and the location you want to establish the business is a busy area,  I guess you will never be poor again because you have all the skills the business required.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: umbara ardian on March 15, 2024, 05:07:32 PM
This crisis demands innovation.  Imagine a world where we don't rely solely on traditional agriculture.  Perhaps the answer lies in "designer food," where oil and gas, currently used for fuel, are cleverly transformed into edible resources.  This shift wouldn't just put food on tables; it would also curb our dependence on fossil fuels.

Finance, the engine of progress, has limitations.  It can't conjure food out of thin air.  A world obsessed with stocks and bonds might neglect the fields and farms that sustain us.  Imagine a society where everyone's a trader, but no one's a farmer.  That's a recipe for disaster.

So, the younger generation holds the key. They can't afford to be one-dimensional.  Yes, finance and technology are important, but so is nurturing the green revolution.  We need engineers who can design vertical farms, scientists who can create drought-resistant crops, and entrepreneurs who can bridge the gap between innovation and affordability.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: tabas on March 15, 2024, 07:34:59 PM
This crisis demands innovation.  Imagine a world where we don't rely solely on traditional agriculture.  Perhaps the answer lies in "designer food," where oil and gas, currently used for fuel, are cleverly transformed into edible resources.  This shift wouldn't just put food on tables; it would also curb our dependence on fossil fuels.
Actually, it doesn't need any innovation. The traditional farming is already enough to sustain our food and have a food security but the interest of the younger generation has changed and it's not all about these traditional things anymore as they don't want to do farming anymore.

Finance, the engine of progress, has limitations.  It can't conjure food out of thin air.  A world obsessed with stocks and bonds might neglect the fields and farms that sustain us.  Imagine a society where everyone's a trader, but no one's a farmer.  That's a recipe for disaster.
I can imagine that world that most of us are all businessmen and doesn't want to go farming, we'd all be dying eventually since there are no more food producers. There should be a drive for the government to attract more people to get into farming that should give the younger generations the idea that they must do it.

So, the younger generation holds the key. They can't afford to be one-dimensional.  Yes, finance and technology are important, but so is nurturing the green revolution.  We need engineers who can design vertical farms, scientists who can create drought-resistant crops, and entrepreneurs who can bridge the gap between innovation and affordability.
We need all of those professionals but we also need the food producers as these younger generations are going to be the hope of the future. If there won't be that much number of them to be pushed that they must go farming, it's going to give that bad impression in the future and it'll turn into problem because we lack of farmers and other food producers.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: dothebeats on March 15, 2024, 08:12:53 PM
This crisis demands innovation.  Imagine a world where we don't rely solely on traditional agriculture.  Perhaps the answer lies in "designer food," where oil and gas, currently used for fuel, are cleverly transformed into edible resources.  This shift wouldn't just put food on tables; it would also curb our dependence on fossil fuels.

Finance, the engine of progress, has limitations.  It can't conjure food out of thin air.  A world obsessed with stocks and bonds might neglect the fields and farms that sustain us.  Imagine a society where everyone's a trader, but no one's a farmer.  That's a recipe for disaster.

So, the younger generation holds the key. They can't afford to be one-dimensional.  Yes, finance and technology are important, but so is nurturing the green revolution.  We need engineers who can design vertical farms, scientists who can create drought-resistant crops, and entrepreneurs who can bridge the gap between innovation and affordability.

So this means you'll turn an already scarce resource into food, which will, in turn, drive demand more to fuel and deplete that even faster. It doesn't solve anything, and and it just adds more problem. No matter how fancy the solution is, the basics are still the most reliable and most practical to solve the problem. Have more farmers, allot more manpower to the farming industry, and possibly sustain food a little longer for the population before we can invent other reliable methods.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: KingsDen on March 15, 2024, 08:34:18 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
For a layman, not necessarily an uncivilised man but an average man, it is easier to learn how to farm than how to earn from cryptocurrency or bitcoin. What I mean in essence is that farming is easier than cryptocurrency trading, investments or mining.  There are also people who do not like risky business.  If they are not sure that $100 will give them $150 the next month, they will not risk it. Apart from cryptocurrency, there are other ways people earn.

Talking about Agriculture, we all know that it is not as primitive as it used to be those days. Many things have actually changed.  Mechanisation and Robotics has made it possible that group of 10 men can produce food 10,000 people will consume.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Mame89 on March 15, 2024, 10:28:04 PM
I don't think so, nowadays young people are also interested in getting involved in agriculture because it is a basic need for many people. However, different from the older generation, young people prefer to develop their agricultural fields using more sophisticated technology which increases the efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural fields.
But it's just that currently the government is not really focused on the agricultural sector, especially in terms of prices of agricultural products, this makes young people a little hesitant about getting involved in this industry. If only the government could care more about the welfare of farmers, perhaps more young people would join this field.
Technology in the agricultural sector has become a necessity and is needed so that it can run effectively. And indeed, in developed countries, many young generations are starting to become interested in agriculture, because apart from having technology, the agricultural sector is also very promising in the future.

Because actually every country has to think about food security, and food security is of course in the hands of the younger generation. However, unfortunately many of the young generation in my country today are not interested in agriculture because agriculture does not provide much hope for their future. Nowadays, many young children are asked what their dreams are. They will definitely answer that they want to become a YouTuber, influencer, trader and so on.

So it's not just the regeneration of livestock breeders that is threatened, livestock breeders and other sectors are also threatened, although currently it is not yet significant. So it is true, as you said, with problems like this, the government should focus on the agricultural sector so that the younger generation is interested in agriculture, so that the country has good food security, so that the country's economic growth also grows.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: hyudien on March 16, 2024, 03:52:39 PM
And the purpose of investing should be profit making, which is the reason people look for a good asset in the market to invest their money and have hope of earning from the investment when bull run come and it will be a good decision to carry out your research before conclude your choice.

Once you have the money on ground and you also have the skills in that particular business you are about to start and the location you want to establish the business is a busy area,  I guess you will never be poor again because you have all the skills the business required.
indeed the aim of investment is for profit, but this can happen if we make and carry out investments, also depending on the knowledge we have, if our investment knowledge is extensive and good, perhaps there will be no losses, because in my opinion losses in investments can be avoided by we have good knowledge, and conversely, if we don't have good knowledge then it is possible that the investment we make will not produce a profit, it will only result in a loss, therefore I think before making an investment we must be able to have good knowledge first .
and also with business, if we really want to start a business there are many things that we have to pay attention to, and what you said is true, skills are one of the things you must have when you want to start a business, because with good skills I think the business you run will run well so that it can generate profits or development. Not everyone can do business, because there are people who are lazy to move on to something better.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: STT on March 16, 2024, 11:28:20 PM
Food prices will rise over 20 years because of how the world economy is developing, at present many people avoid eating meat due to the price it costs.  If you find many more countries able to purchase limited resources then the prices will rise for that product so part of the inflation people complain about will be the export of food to countries able to pay a higher price for it.

Part of the rising cost to food will be Fertilizer and control of that resource which not every country has a source of, this greatly alters crop yield and enhances the local market prices around the productive farms with this resource.  If you continually grow and harvest without returning anything to the soil it will turn farms into poor performing enterprises and business advantage will go elsewhere.  SO just judging Fertilizer prices and access to this resource should indicate some of the demand, its a decade long term market imo as harvest though annual is reliant on long term factors such as the water table, weather and quality of soil


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Ndabagi01 on March 16, 2024, 11:35:42 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Cryptocurrency investment has greatly improved and been adopted in recent years, but I do not believe that all future generations will be so focused on cryptocurrency that they ignore the food sector, which is essential for the world's survival. Many people's attention may have shifted to cryptocurrency, and the few that remain will always benefit from investing in agriculture. If agricultural products become scarce, the implication is that they will be extremely expensive to purchase, and this will be reflected back to those venturing into cryptocurrency while ignoring agriculture to buy with more money. For me, it's a 50/50 split.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: angrybirdy on March 17, 2024, 06:38:39 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Cryptocurrency investment has greatly improved and been adopted in recent years, but I do not believe that all future generations will be so focused on cryptocurrency that they ignore the food sector, which is essential for the world's survival. Many people's attention may have shifted to cryptocurrency, and the few that remain will always benefit from investing in agriculture. If agricultural products become scarce, the implication is that they will be extremely expensive to purchase, and this will be reflected back to those venturing into cryptocurrency while ignoring agriculture to buy with more money. For me, it's a 50/50 split.

Take note that not everyone has the capability to learn about crypto, some people are better when it comes to skilled work compared to office or digital type of business or income, so I can't say if all young people will choose to focus on crypto compared to other work like farming. Here in our country, it's almost the same or balance, because there are a few whose families are rich but prefer to stay in the province to handle their lands or farms but some of them also have knowledge when it comes to crypto and for sure they have an investment too. Mostly businessmen are smart, practical, wise and they really diversify their wealth because they don't just want to stick to a single source of income.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Zoomic on March 17, 2024, 08:00:47 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Cryptocurrency investment has greatly improved and been adopted in recent years, but I do not believe that all future generations will be so focused on cryptocurrency that they ignore the food sector, which is essential for the world's survival. Many people's attention may have shifted to cryptocurrency, and the few that remain will always benefit from investing in agriculture. If agricultural products become scarce, the implication is that they will be extremely expensive to purchase, and this will be reflected back to those venturing into cryptocurrency while ignoring agriculture to buy with more money. For me, it's a 50/50 split.

Take note that not everyone has the capability to learn about crypto, some people are better when it comes to skilled work compared to office or digital type of business or income, so I can't say if all young people will choose to focus on crypto compared to other work like farming. Here in our country, it's almost the same or balance, because there are a few whose families are rich but prefer to stay in the province to handle their lands or farms but some of them also have knowledge when it comes to crypto and for sure they have an investment too. Mostly businessmen are smart, practical, wise and they really diversify their wealth because they don't just want to stick to a single source of income.

I do not know what country you are from but in my country,  majority of the youth are not Interested in agriculture.  They would rather go for Cryptocurrency investments or other white collar jobs. There is obviously no balance between food production and other sectors of the economy and I think OP is actually right about the fact that food security might not be a priority for the younger generations.

We are fast entering into the era of food Scarcity and the obvious reason is that the agricultural sector has been neglected for other sectors they think is quite profitable.  This should be a major cause for concern, if there is no balance between other sectors of the economy and the agricultural sector,  people will have to pay a fortune to get food and other agricultural products which includes raw materials for other forms of production.

Obviously not everyone will go into crypto,  the younger generation are in every other sectors with just few young people investing in food production.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: SmartGold01 on March 17, 2024, 08:25:42 AM
Even as the younger generation adopting cryptocurrency we should also consider that there is some sectors or companies that focuses on farming/production which could help people in future, but due to inflation and increase in farm productions most of the people around my locality is gradually adopting the system of subsistence farming. Where they feed from their farm products without the needs to rely on a general supply from across seller or retailers, we know technology is gradually taking place but that doesn't mean agriculture would be totally eliminated then how do feed on and if I'm not mistakenly agriculture should be the number one priority in every countries since we can't live without food.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Mrbluntzy on March 17, 2024, 10:10:11 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Even if the younger or new generation are completely into adoption and investment of crypto currency, there are still going to be some visionaries among them who will engage in a Commercial Farming system where he can use the profit from his crypto investment to start a commercial farming system that can allow him to also make so much profit from farming. In this century, people are not farming for their individual selfs again because many of them have seen agriculture as a dirty work and they have now become focused on white collar jobs. The only people who are into agriculture are those who still know how beneficial and profitable the agricultural system is.



Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Ever-young on March 17, 2024, 10:26:26 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
This possibility is really very high, but although even as that most people won’t still deviate from agriculture completely, you might not see them farming but their money is working for them. People this period prefer to invest on something why they allow others to work for them, like the farming industry their are lot of people who are into it and they stay close to the farm, what they need is machinery and land space which is where investors comes in, they buy machinery and land for them and at the end of the farm season they share profit with one another.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: oktana on March 17, 2024, 11:12:20 AM
We can see it today as young people are getting taught about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. However, I don’t think that it really affects the economy because people invest in cryptocurrencies, and when they make gains, they tend to use it for other bigger physical investments. Asides that, everyone can’t be rich. There will always be people who would prefer to live a lowly life and own their farm instead of online investment. Cowboys still handle herd of cattle even if Bitcoin is going ATH.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: tread93 on March 18, 2024, 03:38:48 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

I hope that people will start to open their eyes and see what happens when you let corporations choose what goes into the food supply. It just makes me sick the kind of things they get away with in the USA - I can only hope that we could take our eyes off of greed and look ahead towards the green. There is nothing greener about growth! Execpt for aping a fat bag but you know what I mean on those gainz. I sure do hope that these youngsters will wise up!!!


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Pi-network314159 on March 18, 2024, 06:05:13 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Though there Is sence in what you said, cryptocurrency has been the talk of the day and the younger generation is looking upto it as a means of survival and also an escape route of poverty. One thing is for sure, everybody can not be a cryptocurrency investor or trader. Some people will belong to other aspect of life, but I strongly believe that the more reason for inflation in our country today is the inability of people or youths to adventure into farming system. If majority of people go into farming there will be more food and it will reduce inflation. Emagin when people have much money and less food in the economy, the little food will become expensive and that is what will happen. In time coming the farmers will be reacher than some interpreneu because food Is very vital and everyone must Eat.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: bestcoins1 on March 18, 2024, 07:35:03 AM
We can see it today as young people are getting taught about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. However, I don’t think that it really affects the economy because people invest in cryptocurrencies, and when they make gains, they tend to use it for other bigger physical investments. Asides that, everyone can’t be rich. There will always be people who would prefer to live a lowly life and own their farm instead of online investment. Cowboys still handle herd of cattle even if Bitcoin is going ATH.

Each person or certain generation is different in choosing their path in life, so differences in choosing investments also often appear to vary among current generations. And for those who have made profits through crypto investments and are returning to other investments in physical form in this world, that is a good choice and in general it will definitely affect their economy in their respective lives. Even though not everyone can get rich at the same time, at least there are many people who are willing to try their best to get more comfort and profit.

The cowboys who still manage their ranches are not people who deliberately choose to live a simple life, but they may already have more other assets out there so they can feel calm enough in taking care of their ranches. Because work such as livestock is always separate from Bitcoin, so anyone who has bought Bitcoin and holds it can of course still do other work such as taking care of livestock because it is a different job from what he bought before. So this certainly has nothing to do with Bitcoin or the ATH that Bitcoin has achieved.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: DabsPoorVersion on March 18, 2024, 08:38:15 AM

I do not know what country you are from but in my country,  majority of the youth are not Interested in agriculture.  They would rather go for Cryptocurrency investments or other white collar jobs. There is obviously no balance between food production and other sectors of the economy and I think OP is actually right about the fact that food security might not be a priority for the younger generations.

We are fast entering into the era of food Scarcity and the obvious reason is that the agricultural sector has been neglected for other sectors they think is quite profitable.  This should be a major cause for concern, if there is no balance between other sectors of the economy and the agricultural sector,  people will have to pay a fortune to get food and other agricultural products which includes raw materials for other forms of production.

Obviously not everyone will go into crypto,  the younger generation are in every other sectors with just few young people investing in food production.
It's possible that they have personal reasons behind that,

The first thing might be the young generation does not see any future if they continue working in any agricultural jobs. It might be they don't think that if they focus only on farming, they will have a better life for themselves and their family. That's why they often find some other source of income where they can get a better payment.

Or maybe the government needs to give more attention to the agricultural sector. There should be at least one person in the government who will never neglect the future of farming as they will probably face a lot of difficulties if ever there are no longer young people who would like to continue doing this job.

In this scenario, the local government needs to provide more help to the farmers. I know this is not an easy thing to do as they have other things to consider, but there's no other way to make them continue farming if the government doesn't take any action.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Dewi Aries on March 18, 2024, 08:40:12 AM
Each person or certain generation is different in choosing their path in life, so differences in choosing investments also often appear to vary among current generations. And for those who have made profits through crypto investments and are returning to other investments in physical form in this world, that is a good choice and in general it will definitely affect their economy in their respective lives. Even though not everyone can get rich at the same time, at least there are many people who are willing to try their best to get more comfort and profit.

The cowboys who still manage their ranches are not people who deliberately choose to live a simple life, but they may already have more other assets out there so they can feel calm enough in taking care of their ranches. Because work such as livestock is always separate from Bitcoin, so anyone who has bought Bitcoin and holds it can of course still do other work such as taking care of livestock because it is a different job from what he bought before. So this certainly has nothing to do with Bitcoin or the ATH that Bitcoin has achieved.

In my opinion, currently with the current generation, they don't think about this, most of the current generation only think about styles that are currently trendy, because maybe that is one of the mandatory requirements for hanging out, whether it's because of prestige or thirsty for praise. they don't think about their future, maybe there is a small part of the current generation who think about their future, by doing hard work and saving or studying investments because they want their future to be able to achieve financial freedom. Everyone's desire is of course wealth and comfort, but there are people who don't want to try but want wealth or a comfortable life, that's annoying.

I think farming work or bitcoin investment are both good, I don't think either of these two things are bad. Of course, everyone has different thoughts, and as you said, everyone has their own path in life, maybe there are those who are comfortable with having a farm because it is a real activity carried out with body movements and so on. and it's the same with investments. both are equally good things.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Miles2006 on March 18, 2024, 12:07:18 PM
Bitcoin adoption can never be a threat to the economy besides bitcoin adoption is better compared to other investment choice, an individual can also engage in both but let's not think the agriculture sector will go down sooner or later, it's impossible as everyone have different choice to make. It's certain the younger generation will definitely make use of bitcoin as it's seen now in our generation, little children still engage in digital technology and different gaming project.  I still believe the agriculture sector will be better in the next generation compared to our generation presently. As the world continue to modernize we should be prepared to accept new inventions, technology like wise our agriculture sector, including bitcoin adoption cause no modernize society will decide to go against bitcoin adoption like how? I know the new generation have more things to offer so it's best to start educating them about the digital currency bitcoin.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: moneystery on March 18, 2024, 12:33:06 PM
this is quite worrying, considering that agriculture and food are two things that are quite important in a country. when the younger generation prefers to invest in cryptocurrency rather than in the agricultural and livestock sectors, it will have a significant impact on local industry and this could lead to basic agricultural and livestock prices soaring. prices of basic commodities may become unreasonable and that will have a negative impact on society.

and because of this problem, it is necessary for various stakeholders to be able to ensure that the younger generation can know more about agriculture and animal husbandry and can be interested and directly involved in the industry. if stakeholders can campaign positively for the industry and provide various incentives to those who want to invest or get involved in the industry, it will be very possible for the younger generation to see the potential of the industry.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: oktana on March 18, 2024, 10:19:41 PM
We can see it today as young people are getting taught about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. However, I don’t think that it really affects the economy because people invest in cryptocurrencies, and when they make gains, they tend to use it for other bigger physical investments. Asides that, everyone can’t be rich. There will always be people who would prefer to live a lowly life and own their farm instead of online investment. Cowboys still handle herd of cattle even if Bitcoin is going ATH.

Each person or certain generation is different in choosing their path in life, so differences in choosing investments also often appear to vary among current generations. And for those who have made profits through crypto investments and are returning to other investments in physical form in this world, that is a good choice and in general it will definitely affect their economy in their respective lives. Even though not everyone can get rich at the same time, at least there are many people who are willing to try their best to get more comfort and profit.

The cowboys who still manage their ranches are not people who deliberately choose to live a simple life, but they may already have more other assets out there so they can feel calm enough in taking care of their ranches. Because work such as livestock is always separate from Bitcoin, so anyone who has bought Bitcoin and holds it can of course still do other work such as taking care of livestock because it is a different job from what he bought before. So this certainly has nothing to do with Bitcoin or the ATH that Bitcoin has achieved.

I tell you that someone of them are doing it because they love it. They are happy and it’s fun for them. Event the farmers we speak of, some people love to farm. It doesn’t matter how much money you bring them, they love planting and nurturing fruits, trees, etc. There are also people who don’t have interest in online investments, they would rather do something that can be seen and touched physically than online. There will always be different kinds of people, even the type you never believed existed.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Bloodseekers on March 19, 2024, 10:21:44 AM
this is quite worrying, considering that agriculture and food are two things that are quite important in a country. when the younger generation prefers to invest in cryptocurrency rather than in the agricultural and livestock sectors, it will have a significant impact on local industry and this could lead to basic agricultural and livestock prices soaring. prices of basic commodities may become unreasonable and that will have a negative impact on society.

and because of this problem, it is necessary for various stakeholders to be able to ensure that the younger generation can know more about agriculture and animal husbandry and can be interested and directly involved in the industry. if stakeholders can campaign positively for the industry and provide various incentives to those who want to invest or get involved in the industry, it will be very possible for the younger generation to see the potential of the industry.
It is true that many of the young generation nowadays rarely like agriculture and most of the young generation have started to leave the field of agriculture and this will be a problem if no one can produce the food needs in an area, you are right of course the government must be able to looking at this so that we can find a solution to make the current generation still like agriculture so that they can still control their food needs and prices, because if food prices continue to increase of course this will make it very difficult to meet the needs of each community and with support from The government will certainly be able to encourage the younger generation to remain involved in the field of food growth, so this will be able to control food prices and make their economy better.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Argoo on March 22, 2024, 04:47:05 AM

I tell you that someone of them are doing it because they love it. They are happy and it’s fun for them. Event the farmers we speak of, some people love to farm. It doesn’t matter how much money you bring them, they love planting and nurturing fruits, trees, etc. There are also people who don’t have interest in online investments, they would rather do something that can be seen and touched physically than online. There will always be different kinds of people, even the type you never believed existed.
I completely agree with you. There will always be people who will be more passionate about farming, growing fruits and vegetables, pets, than engaging in other types of business and investing. But who ultimately wins more is a matter of specific case. But all people need to eat every day. Therefore, agriculture is actually the basis of everything. The demand for agricultural products will always be consistently high. If there are difficulties in it, this will lead to higher prices, but people who are employed in other areas will be forced to buy these products in order to survive. Everything is interconnected here, so there is no need to worry about the future of agriculture.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: bestcoins1 on March 29, 2024, 02:24:24 PM
I tell you that someone of them are doing it because they love it. They are happy and it’s fun for them. Event the farmers we speak of, some people love to farm. It doesn’t matter how much money you bring them, they love planting and nurturing fruits, trees, etc. There are also people who don’t have interest in online investments, they would rather do something that can be seen and touched physically than online. There will always be different kinds of people, even the type you never believed existed.

The type of work and the principles of each person in working will never be the same as each other, mate, so you don't need to tell me that because in my own place there are also people like that who don't even like crowds like in the market so prefer to be alone with farming. Even though the agricultural products will also be sold to the market through their own agents without taking up their own selling space. So people like that still exist in this world and it is very natural that they are not interested in online business or online investment like many people do today.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: |MINER| on March 29, 2024, 07:52:25 PM
Investing only for money can never be a sign of a developed nation.  It is good to invest for money or for growth of money but you have to think about the country too.  Youth must be invested in the agriculture sector and innovative farming systems should be invented.  This is also one of the ways of an income.  Interest in Bitcoin has increased among young people.  The new generation thinks that farming or investing in the agricultural sector is the work of the lower classes.  We have to change this perception and make them aware of how important agriculture is to a country.  Moreover, investments in agriculture can be profitable if advanced technology is used.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: lizarder on March 29, 2024, 09:13:55 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
The younger generation has always been not interested in the agricultural sector and I see firsthand how they prefer other sectors to work even though the salary is much smaller they get. Even on campus there is such a thing as the Faculty of Agriculture, but the interest in the faculty is quite small. What I see is precisely young people when they have to go into agriculture and may be a mindset about agriculture that relies on power so as to make them malasa to enter this field. Whereas now agriculture has progressed rapidly, ranging from the process of planting to harvest because it has used machines, but understanding in developing countries is not a promising job.

I see that some countries with agricultural income have exceeded exports can actually provide wealth to the culprit and they prefer to work in agriculture compared to other sectors. Maybe the mindset must be changed because agriculture is the veins for the country and without agriculture maybe humans will never be able to get food that is suitable for consumption.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Wakate on March 29, 2024, 10:41:34 PM
Investing only for money can never be a sign of a developed nation.  It is good to invest for money or for growth of money but you have to think about the country too.  Youth must be invested in the agriculture sector and innovative farming systems should be invented.  This is also one of the ways of an income.  Interest in Bitcoin has increased among young people.  The new generation thinks that farming or investing in the agricultural sector is the work of the lower classes.  We have to change this perception and make them aware of how important agriculture is to a country.  Moreover, investments in agriculture can be profitable if advanced technology is used.
This is not sonin the advanced country, agricultural business is a lucrative one and people are being paid well just like the regular work. We don't have to underestimate the importance of being part of the agricultural sector because this is the part that brings raw materials to several industries in the country even for international uses. It is a part we don't have to neglect because it could have a big consequences on us as a nation. It is just that many children of the new generation are not ready to work, what they care about is to keep making money online without the need to invest in agricultural business to enhance food production and supply.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: oktana on March 29, 2024, 11:34:37 PM
Investing only for money can never be a sign of a developed nation.  It is good to invest for money or for growth of money but you have to think about the country too.  Youth must be invested in the agriculture sector and innovative farming systems should be invented.  This is also one of the ways of an income.  Interest in Bitcoin has increased among young people.  The new generation thinks that farming or investing in the agricultural sector is the work of the lower classes.  We have to change this perception and make them aware of how important agriculture is to a country.  Moreover, investments in agriculture can be profitable if advanced technology is used.

“Must”. It isn’t compulsory. Youths should be involved and shouldn’t be seen as a must. Irrespective of the increased Interest in Bitcoin by youths, there are still youths who go to the farm on a daily basis. No matter how profitable Bitcoin will be, not every youth would prefer it. And honestly, farmers make a lot of money. I know they face hurdles but farming is a profitable business that could actually pay more than many average jobs.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: btc78 on April 08, 2024, 11:51:32 AM
In today’s time where inflation is higher than ever with lower chances of huge incomes, kids nowadays are looking at where there can be money.

Of course they would be interested in sectors that could bring them most money. The younger generation is always experimenting and trying out new ideas to make some profits. If the government can not help the farmers and the agricultural sector at large, not even the older generations would take interest in investing in such things anymore.

In an economist perspective, this might be a sign of something that should be addressed soon. In our perspective as investors, it is practical and smart and thus should be void of any emotional nor sentimental value.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Dzwaafu11 on April 08, 2024, 12:16:25 PM
Investing only for money can never be a sign of a developed nation.  It is good to invest for money or for growth of money but you have to think about the country too.  Youth must be invested in the agriculture sector and innovative farming systems should be invented.  This is also one of the ways of an income.  Interest in Bitcoin has increased among young people.  The new generation thinks that farming or investing in the agricultural sector is the work of the lower classes.  We have to change this perception and make them aware of how important agriculture is to a country.  Moreover, investments in agriculture can be profitable if advanced technology is used.

You are right. Agriculture investment is very good and very important to the government at large because it will give a country other ways of generating revenue from other countries, which will be another benefit to the nation in my country. The current government has taken the agricultural sector as another important thing to do now because they have realized how useful it is and how it will reduce the cost of living in the country because if a country can produce its own food, then I assure that there is no more cost of food in the country, which is a very good thing.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Dailyscript on April 08, 2024, 12:57:25 PM
Investing only for money can never be a sign of a developed nation.  It is good to invest for money or for growth of money but you have to think about the country too.  Youth must be invested in the agriculture sector and innovative farming systems should be invented.  This is also one of the ways of an income.  Interest in Bitcoin has increased among young people.  The new generation thinks that farming or investing in the agricultural sector is the work of the lower classes.  We have to change this perception and make them aware of how important agriculture is to a country.  Moreover, investments in agriculture can be profitable if advanced technology is used.
Your not wrong here! Investing in a country should not just be focused on technology but should be spread out towards all the important things a country needs. Getting young people involved in agriculture is going to make the sector work so well. Meanwhile i thought about combining advanced technology with agriculture would make a greater impact. Farming has become more efficient and profitable thanks to the new technological tools but only a few are interested in it. That is why i am in support of the idea that the young ones should be encouraged to see agriculture as something that is good, and not something of low importance.

In today’s time where inflation is higher than ever with lower chances of huge incomes, kids nowadays are looking at where there can be money.

Of course they would be interested in sectors that could bring them most money. The younger generation is always experimenting and trying out new ideas to make some profits. If the government can not help the farmers and the agricultural sector at large, not even the older generations would take interest in investing in such things anymore.

In an economist perspective, this might be a sign of something that should be addressed soon. In our perspective as investors, it is practical and smart and thus should be void of any emotional nor sentimental value.
This is really my concern. People are now interested in quick money which only few will be lucky at attaining it. The thing they do not understand is that this money can come quickly but it wont last because it was not built on a strong foundation. There is a different between quick money and a foundational money is that quick money comes and go, but foundational money creates more channel of money flows. It stays for a lifetime. Only few persons understand this and if you check those persons when they get wealthy they can never go broke again.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Juse14 on April 08, 2024, 05:23:31 PM
In today’s time where inflation is higher than ever with lower chances of huge incomes, kids nowadays are looking at where there can be money.

Of course they would be interested in sectors that could bring them most money. The younger generation is always experimenting and trying out new ideas to make some profits. If the government can not help the farmers and the agricultural sector at large, not even the older generations would take interest in investing in such things anymore.

In an economist perspective, this might be a sign of something that should be addressed soon. In our perspective as investors, it is practical and smart and thus should be void of any emotional nor sentimental value.

However, it is very unfortunate, in reality the younger generation's interest in getting involved in the agricultural industry is very minimal. And of course I say this not without reason, I see this reality very clearly, because I live in an agricultural country. Young people are very reluctant to enter the agricultural industry, because the profession of a farmer is often considered lowly. Even though going into the agricultural industry seems profitable, because their prestige is very high, they prefer to work as office employees, even though the wages they earn are relatively small. I don't know what the conditions for food security will be like in the future, but if you look at the existing reality, there is very little interest in becoming a farmer and land continues to shrink. If this problem is not addressed immediately, perhaps the food security situation in the future will be more difficult than today.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Yaqs15 on May 08, 2024, 03:32:28 PM
It definitely depends on what kind of environment the kid grew up on. Most
kids who grew up around farms and agricultural fields are most likely to pursue
The same path. But we need to note that we are now in the digital era and being
interested in technology is never a bad thing especially one like crypto

I think there will still be a few kids who would be interested in other sectors
So as long as there are some kids interested in the agricultural industry, then it will not affect the economy badly even if most would be into crypto

Besides I think crypto can actually enhance the agricultural sector more these are two things I think can both overlap
Crypto, even if it will actually enhance agricultural sector, it will be like promoting it in the forum, practicing it and harvesting it and at the end of the day, the money gained from it, you still invest it in crypto. a lot of kids that grew up together, likely focus the same direction and have same business idea.
Some even trade crypto and after successful gaining is achieved, they invest part of it in agriculture either subsistence agriculture or commercial agriculture.

Even as the younger generation adopting cryptocurrency we should also consider that there is some sectors or companies that focuses on farming/production which could help people in future, but due to inflation and increase in farm productions most of the people around my locality is gradually adopting the system of subsistence farming. Where they feed from their farm products without the needs to rely on a general supply from across seller or retailers, we know technology is gradually taking place but that doesn't mean agriculture would be totally eliminated then how do feed on and if I'm not mistakenly agriculture should be the number one priority in every countries since we can't live without food.
That is it. you are not alone in that aspect. You should not even say you think agriculture should be taken as number one priority. It is on the peak of the lather as far as human being is concerned, as far as you are still living. Almost all living things require agriculture either directly or indirectly. Animal. need plants and animals to survive since some of them are carnivores, some are herbivores and some are omnivores. So also plants require animal decays, animal's dungs or faeces, as their fertilizer or organic manures. plants also need decays of other plants for this purpose. plants also need animals' carbon dioxide as their own oxygen.



Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: slapper on May 08, 2024, 06:01:11 PM
In today’s time where inflation is higher than ever with lower chances of huge incomes, kids nowadays are looking at where there can be money.

Of course they would be interested in sectors that could bring them most money. The younger generation is always experimenting and trying out new ideas to make some profits. If the government can not help the farmers and the agricultural sector at large, not even the older generations would take interest in investing in such things anymore.

In an economist perspective, this might be a sign of something that should be addressed soon. In our perspective as investors, it is practical and smart and thus should be void of any emotional nor sentimental value.

However, it is very unfortunate, in reality the younger generation's interest in getting involved in the agricultural industry is very minimal. And of course I say this not without reason, I see this reality very clearly, because I live in an agricultural country. Young people are very reluctant to enter the agricultural industry, because the profession of a farmer is often considered lowly. Even though going into the agricultural industry seems profitable, because their prestige is very high, they prefer to work as office employees, even though the wages they earn are relatively small. I don't know what the conditions for food security will be like in the future, but if you look at the existing reality, there is very little interest in becoming a farmer and land continues to shrink. If this problem is not addressed immediately, perhaps the food security situation in the future will be more difficult than today.
Listen, farming gets a bad rap. People see it as old-school, backbreaking. But food is the foundation of everything. Population's exploding, good land is shrinking... someone's gotta figure out how to feed us all. We're way past grandpa's farm. This is about tech, about business smarts. This is the future's MOST important industry. Forget chasing suits and ties. Imagine being a leader in agriculture: using gene editing to make crops better, running lean farms with precision tech, selling your products directly to the world

Problem is, young people are programmed to think "office = success". Not realizing they could have more impact, more freedom, growing stuff we need. Look, I'm not saying everyone's a farmer, but we disrespect the potential. Food security? Economic stability? Starts with rethinking how we feed ourselves. This ain't some hippie-dippy back-to-the-land thing. This is about innovation. About respect. Think about it: those closest to the earth, they could be the ones solving our biggest problems


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Renampun on May 08, 2024, 06:32:58 PM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?

Your fear is that the possibility of this happening is very small, however this world will always look for its own balance, maybe we think that the majority of young people will choose to invest in cryptocurrencies rather than in the agricultural sector but what happens in the real world, there are so many balances happening, children Many young people are still interested in investing in the agricultural sector, not only in cryptocurrencies, in fact currently there are many new innovations emerging, for example hydroponic and aquaponic farming.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Yukyzu on May 10, 2024, 01:10:10 AM
*Reposting this topic from my post in other forum.

There is a huge possibility of younger or new generations adopting cryptocurrency investments compared to them getting interests on farming and food related sectors. What do you think? Does it have a good or bad effects on our economy?
Your fear is that the possibility of this happening is very small, however this world will always look for its own balance, maybe we think that the majority of young people will choose to invest in cryptocurrencies rather than in the agricultural sector but what happens in the real world, there are so many balances happening, children Many young people are still interested in investing in the agricultural sector, not only in cryptocurrencies, in fact currently there are many new innovations emerging, for example hydroponic and aquaponic farming.
Yes, of course there will always be a balance in this matter and it is impossible for the current generation not to like agriculture and prefer to invest in crypto. Currently we can see that the development of the agricultural sector is very good, as you said, hydroponic and aquaponic agriculture is of course something It is very interesting to have even a little land, we can try it like in our yard, of course this will help a little with our own food needs, investing in crypto is also very interesting for us to do because we can see that in the last few years there has been an increase which is good because everyone understands that investing in crypto will also be very profitable for our future, but we must first understand the risks of this investment well so that we don't make mistakes in carrying it out.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: bettercrypto on May 10, 2024, 04:06:40 AM
Crypto investment here in our country is mostly not good for people who have no idea or know about this matter. But for those who know, of course it's not a scam. Actually, there is a lot of opportunity here in the crypto space. And when we have a chance to earn, we will also have a chance to buy our prime commodities, for sure.

Especially in today's time when it is difficult to get a job physically, online marketing or digital marketing online are good options for us to get profit and earn a lot of money on the online platform. And one here in the cryptocurrency industry business field.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Juse14 on May 12, 2024, 06:31:03 PM
~
Listen, farming gets a bad rap. People see it as old-school, backbreaking. But food is the foundation of everything. Population's exploding, good land is shrinking... someone's gotta figure out how to feed us all. We're way past grandpa's farm. This is about tech, about business smarts. This is the future's MOST important industry. Forget chasing suits and ties. Imagine being a leader in agriculture: using gene editing to make crops better, running lean farms with precision tech, selling your products directly to the world

It is a wrong perspective to think that farming is tiring, in the industrial era 4.0 which will soon reach 5.0. Technology has an important role in every sector, including the agricultural sector, and with the help of technology everything becomes easier to do, including in the agricultural sector.

If you think farming is tiring, it means you don't understand the use of technology and technological transformation in the agricultural industry. With the presence of technology, for example when plowing a field, you no longer need to get dirty to plow the field, because you just have to sit on the machine or use the remote control, and the job is done.

Quote
Problem is, young people are programmed to think "office = success". Not realizing they could have more impact, more freedom, growing stuff we need. Look, I'm not saying everyone's a farmer, but we disrespect the potential. Food security? Economic stability? Starts with rethinking how we feed ourselves. This ain't some hippie-dippy back-to-the-land thing. This is about innovation. About respect. Think about it: those closest to the earth, they could be the ones solving our biggest problems

A person is free to choose and determine where he will work, and what profession he will choose, whether as an academic or as an office employee and so on. However, behind all that, there are several things that we must pay attention to, including the current food crisis. So even though we are free to choose and determine where we will work, because we are talking about urgency, young people should never hesitate to enter the agricultural industry. And in order to answer all the food problems that occur, the agricultural industry really needs the energy and thinking of young people. .


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: pusaka on May 12, 2024, 06:45:36 PM
Quote
Problem is, young people are programmed to think "office = success". Not realizing they could have more impact, more freedom, growing stuff we need. Look, I'm not saying everyone's a farmer, but we disrespect the potential. Food security? Economic stability? Starts with rethinking how we feed ourselves. This ain't some hippie-dippy back-to-the-land thing. This is about innovation. About respect. Think about it: those closest to the earth, they could be the ones solving our biggest problems

A person is free to choose and determine where he will work, and what profession he will choose, whether as an academic or as an office employee and so on. However, behind all that, there are several things that we must pay attention to, including the current food crisis. So even though we are free to choose and determine where we will work, because we are talking about urgency, young people should never hesitate to enter the agricultural industry. And in order to answer all the food problems that occur, the agricultural industry really needs the energy and thinking of young people. .
That's right, everyone has the right to decide where they will work, what career they will pursue, that is a right that they fully own. But the problem is that when they don't base it on their skills, they tend to force themselves to be successful in a certain sector just because they see other people being successful there. Actually, it's okay as long as they only use it as motivation and what's wrong is when they "push themselves too hard" to move in the same field. Because they no longer rely on their skills.
And in this day and age, that kind of mindset has been formed, so that today's young people only focus on things that they think are cool. However, if they are willing to dig further into what they are naturally skilled at, perhaps they will be more successful. Now many young people do not want to work in the food sector because they are proud and think it is a job that is not suitable for them.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: Huppercase on May 12, 2024, 08:06:57 PM
Crypto investment here in our country is mostly not good for people who have no idea or know about this matter. But for those who know, of course it's not a scam. Actually, there is a lot of opportunity here in the crypto space. And when we have a chance to earn, we will also have a chance to buy our prime commodities, for sure.

There is no crypto that's bad for anyone, they just lack the knowledge to understand the real meaning of cryptocurrency, they probably must have heard the gross aspect of crypto and they have been living as ignorant people that refuse to learn. There is no way anyone with good knowledge of crypto will say crypto is scam unless for people that just want to have quick gains and when they invest in wrong project, they cry he'll and spit nonsense about cryptocurrency.

Quote
Especially in today's time when it is difficult to get a job physically, online marketing or digital marketing online are good options for us to get profit and earn a lot of money on the online platform. And one here in the cryptocurrency industry business field.

How many people are actually making it from online marketing and that digital feed, that's look like a monopoly of jobs, it's better to spread out opportunities and seek for knowledge where you know you can survive. It's good that you are part of people that knows and understand crypto, you shared knowledge will help them to look at crypto too and if they enjoy it, they will appreciate you.


Title: Re: Food security might not be a priority for younger generations. (2)
Post by: dothebeats on May 12, 2024, 08:27:22 PM
Crypto investment here in our country is mostly not good for people who have no idea or know about this matter. But for those who know, of course it's not a scam. Actually, there is a lot of opportunity here in the crypto space. And when we have a chance to earn, we will also have a chance to buy our prime commodities, for sure.

Especially in today's time when it is difficult to get a job physically, online marketing or digital marketing online are good options for us to get profit and earn a lot of money on the online platform. And one here in the cryptocurrency industry business field.

And this is why agriculture will no longer be prioritized by the next generation. Everyone is looking to be a part of something that will net them easy profits and not look at the big picture. I understand why that is the case, but it's just saddening to know that not a lot of people are interested in farming anymore. Perhaps you can also blame the government for not supporting the industry and going towards full industrialization, land developments for huge corporations, and relying everything on importing rather than enriching agriculture in their own soil.