Bitcoin Forum

Motivation behind this thread:

---

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   ;D

What about you?

When I was in Bitsler's signature campaign, in the first weeks we were getting paid on Bitsler's account. The owner was also giving us additional money for paying withdrawal fees. I've gambled with that money and I think that the purpose of account deposit was to make us gamble because that really makes sense but I might be wrong. Bitsler was paying me so much for that time and I was forcing myself to lose money sometimes. Btw to be fair, now I'm in Metawin's signature campaign, I get paid on my account and sometimes I deposit money from my account to Metawin's account to gamble and have some fun. So for me, it doesn't matter whether I get payments directly on my casino account or on my wallet, if I want to gamble, I gamble and if I don't want to gamble, I don't gamble, as easy as ABC.

I dont remember receiving signature campaign reward directly on a casino balance, but, if I would have received it, I think I would have gambled :D Because yeah, why not? Couple of small bets, once a week wont hurt. I dont think anyone would dumb all of his weekly reward at once in gambling. I dont think that casinos do that on purpose (however they have that in mind). Imho they do it to make casino more popular, more remembering.

Just like in the content of OP, I am a stake participant and I do receive my pay in my stake account but never have i used it to gamble. The thing is, I am more of a sports bettor and I'm comfortable betting in local sportsbook using fiat.

At the same time, gambling with your signature pay might force you to go against your bankroll management. Which is one mistake I wouldn't want to do.

Well there was a signature campaign I participated and it was only for a week, when I joined the payment was sent directly to their gambling site and there are requirements which one must meet to enable them make withdrawal, this condition aren't stated on their signature thread but after payment and I wanted to withdraw I noticed that I must reached a certain threshold for me to be able to have my funds withdrawn.

And of course, it's like a compulsive gambling where the said user has to gamble to meet their requirements to be able to make withdrawal so I had to gamble with such amount sent to gamble site, I was actually lucky enough to had winning and meet up their requirements to be able to withdraw my funds. Most times signature campaign payment sent to their gambling site are indirectly want to gamble and want to take back their payment back to them because they knew that gamblers must lose while gambling.

Yeah I think it's make sense and it's not about how much you get paid.

Even though the casino whitelist your account, cover your withdrawal fees and pay you a good amount of money e.g. $100+, it's still encourage us to gamble because our accounts have been funded, we don't need to make any transaction which spend like 10-20 minutes.

People have to able to control themselves to not gamble too much.

Yes. I would say that a vast majority of the funds I’ve gambled with have been due to campaign payments. I don’t see anything wrong with that though. It is smart of them to do it that way and as a member of their campaign I appreciate being able to check out the product that I am advertising.

I think this is based on individuals, some perons can actually be moved to gamble when the received their pay from signature campaigns that pays directly in the account if their participants in their site, I remaber when I was a participant of Jacks club is signature campaign, we were been paid in the casino site but I have never used any of the funds paid to me to gamble, through out my participation in that campaign, so I will only say this depends on the participants and how he or she does their own thing, one thing i know for sure is that, once any gambler starts gambling with amount paid to them directly in their casino account, the participant may not be able to withdraw a dime even when he or she wins, infact such gambler might decide to leave he's paying in that site so that he will using it play there.

Mine isn't directed to casino account. But if I would have received it, it's for sure that I'll try to gamble for some.
And if I'm going to gamble with some of it, it's just the start of it. Maybe I'll be gamble for more if I lose my control.
That's why we see stories of other forum members that they become addicted and spends the sig money that they receive direct to their accounts because it's easy to gamble once it's there.

As you wrote, "Because why not?". It makes things easier and can save us from some transaction fees... of course, us who would gamble anyway.

I think that if the signature payment goes directly to the casino, it makes people want to gamble... even if they didn't plan to. It's like the balance is there, why not take the opportunity to make a few bets/spins/rolls... I was in that situation many times, and many times I made a few or more dollars profit, even more times I got carried away and lost everything. So be careful, it's all gambling... tricky business. :)

Ive been there before ive joined into a signature which requires to have your casino account and it will directly created to your wallet and reason why i played some little bit of my earnings to the casino and if it its win good because youve gained extra but if not feels bad at the same time because imagine you can just cashout immediately but again this depends to the player if you are active in playing gambling still good because no hassle to make transfer but if you are trader the same time for sure you will feel the market price movement specially if you are into BTC.

Yes, you will be tempted to play with the casino that you promoted since it is already there. Might be good if you have a poll though, to readily see the pulse of those old and current participants whose campaign payment goes directly into our account. Myself as well before, when I have this campaign, maybe the next question is can we blame them for putting it into the casino account? No, still up to the gambler to what to do to their payment. Maybe there are still who goes and control themselves to withdraw right away, as they might not be a real gamble (yes, I do think that there are participants that don't gamble at all but joined gambling signature campaign, no offense to them, but you can see from the post that it's like they are force to post and discuss some topics in the gambling/gambling threads as it is part of the campaign rule). But that is a topic for another discussion.

This is quite a personal decision because whether is paid directly to your casino or not a gambler that wants to gamble would definitely going to gamble. Although, the truth is that as an addicted gamblers paying directly into your casino might likely trigger you to gamble beyond control. Because most of us normally have this feeling of doubling our money overnight.

However, I would budly say that this can never trigger me to gamble above my limit because I have work in such campaign before and withdraw my money without being tempted.

Sometimes it does. If the casino has a good reputation and offers variety of games, I’ll try the casino at least because the funds are already there. I don’t need to make a deposit separately. But like I said that happens under certain circumstances. I don’t go randomly play at a casino just because they are paying me via sig camp, especially if the casino is new, that means i have to be extra careful. It is also important that when i decide to withdraw my coins from the casino, the casino should pay for the transaction fees because otherwise it wouldn’t make much sense to get payments directly to the casino account. Some managers don’t make this an emergency but i think they should.

I can withdraw current sign payments freely (no withdrawal fee either), but earlier I had won this BTC price prediction contest from same casino — I received amount, tried instant withdraw (knowing gambling it would likely cause me to lose it), wasn't able to as amount was below the minimum threshold, so I made some bets and thankfully I was also lucky enough to win those and was able to withdraw.


I would not blame them, and if I was at casino's place, I would want payments sent directly to casino too as it makes user open casino and might make few bets as well. Just don't put restrictions as in wager and shit, and it's all good.

I am seeing some people claim that the purpose of signature payment to casino account is to make them gamble that money but NO, the purpose is to skip the middlemen/escrow to handle the payout and they prefer them sending it directly and if the chose casino account they will simply transfer it with no extra fees and as byproduct some may chose to gamble it away. :D

It makes sense though because lot of users who never registered into the casino they are promoting so if they are not aware of the service they are promoting and what it offers to the people it doesn't feel right.

I have never seen a signature campaign that was FORCING user to play the reward. Maybe in some old bounties there was a "wagering requirements" of 1 time at any odd but never seen this for signature.
In soe cases it was just helpful to have funds already there (likewise if you want gamble you have already a deposit there) but this is nothing more for continue to gamble with signature payments ;)

Perhaps they will gamble that money, maybe some of us treat signature campaign as a hustle or side line. So once we got the payment, there could some urge to bet whether casino games and sports bettor. If you win, then good you might withdraw it right away. But if you lose, then don't take it hard, there could be another one coming next year.

I haven't been in a campaign that I received the payment in the casino itself. But I must say that I could be one of those gamblers that will used it to play and just hope that I can win and double what I got from the current week.

From what the comments that I read, it could still be 50/50.

i think this can only happen to those that receives their signature payment directly to their casino app. but for  those that receives payment to their btc wallet, it is easier for them to HODL their btc while it increase with the passage of time. they can not be tempted to gamble with their fund since it is in their wallet unlike the other campaign that pay directly to their casino app. in conclusion, receiving payment directly to your casino app makes a person gamble.

right.. receiving weekly payment straight to your casino account is essentially turning on your risk appetite.  you know bonus money mechanisms are used by casinos to trick you into spending more time & money however you might not even realise it because it seems like free money.  Risk tolerance rises because the brain interprets it as house money.  Bonus offers distort real costs & can lure you into chasing losses.  so just because it is a surprise deposit does not mean it is safe. recently i've seen some review campaign pay you directly to your casino account and they want you place bet 100% of your funds to withdraw your rewards.. So it's just a trick to keep you gambling.

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/08/29/UZWuKq.png (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5554597.msg65694681#msg65694681)

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

Anything that give you easy access to play would provably attract you to gamble.

Especially if you see some nice promotion running around and you know how to play then there's available balance to use came from signature campaign earnings for sure that you will get tempted to use it then try to earn more bigger profit from the current money you have.

But still its up to the receiver if they want to use and play with those money they got since I believe the campaign manager or the owner didn't force them to gamble.

I remembered, I used to gamble my funds when I still participated in the campaign signature of blackjack.fun given that they paid well during that time.

Back in those days, I would use like 50% of my signature campaign earnings to gamble at their website given that I receive their funds directly into our respective accounts in that website. It was both a fun and dangerous experience given that there were times where I used everything in one sitting.


I also remembered that there was a time that you couldn't withdraw your funds from that gambling website due to the minimum withdrawal requirement. When I was still Jr. Member many years ago, I had trouble withdrawing my funds and it took me like 2-3 weeks of pay in order to withdraw directly to my wallet.

This way you can try the casino with peace of mind, that's what it's for
Maybe there are some games that you like and stay, some are definitely fun
i am old and i don't like playing computer games, i prefer real iterations and so they don't appeal to me much

I treat my signature earning earning like my real life earning. I only take 1% from it to gamble. This has been very helpful for me in life because signature campaign payment in my country is not a small amount of money. It can even higher than monthly salary here in my country. So I only use just 1% to gamble because the remaining 99% can be used to establish something good if saved.

Actually, I’ve thought about this before. What if the payment went directly to a casino, just like Stake’s campaign? Would I be able to hold back, and for how long? As a gambler, that’s honestly very tempting. I’m thankful it’s not directly to 1win, because it’s already tempting enough to make a deposit, what more if it went straight into the casino? If you can’t hold back, it’s either you walk away with 2x or more of your payment, or you end up empty handed. To be honest, I’d rather not have my payment go directly to a casino, simply because I know myself very well. Lol.

I believe that is the body language of the casino for participants under their payroll to also patronize them instead of going to other casino to play. They do that also for marketing purposes but aside that, I like the part that it is not mandatory for you to use your payment to gamble on their platform. It is a choice to make. It is tempting however especially for a gambler who plays steady and online, you will always visit your pay master's business which is dangerous if you can't control your emotions because you will end up playing against the house edge. You don't need deposit or refilling of your account because you have the money there, very inimical.

I think it’s both interesting and right to try out what you advertise. I enjoy using casino services, it’s an entertaining pastime for me. And I consider the money from signature a legitimate source that I can spend on gambling, although the amount is usually much smaller than what I earn from sign.

Some casinos signature campaign payment policy is that they would pay signature campaign participants directly to their casino account. Maybe that is a way to reduce the stress of paying for transaction fees and all of that.
Before one applies for such campaign, it is clearly stated on the terms and conditions to accept before applying for such a campaign and mind you some casinos do have standing policy with respect to wager and minimum withdrawal and in some cases they give participants free will to withdraw but from OP point of view here, I don't think payment to casino account would turn one a gambler depending on the casino withdrawal policy and if it requires that you gamble before you withdraw then you will have to do it because you saw, read and accepted the terms and conditions before applying for the campaign
However, if the casino give a special preference to campaign participants to withdraw without any commitment since they work to get paid for it then it is fine otherwise one would need to gamble so as to meet the requirements before they withdraw.

If the campaign lasts for more than a few months, I do try them out to understand how their casino works, and it's one way to start a discussion in their announcement thread.

I don't mind spending a bit of time and coin playing as long as they have lower minimum withdrawals, but if the amount i'm getting from their campaign is just enough for the minimum, then I have to skip and wait it out.

Definitely yes, I've been in countless campaign and I've been a participant to one campaign of a gambling site where they sent the rewards directly to the casino wallet and I can really say that on the first few weeks, I've managed to double or at least have some more by placing 1-2 bets, but on the latter part of the campaign, I think 1-3 weeks I've lost my reward by trying my chance to double or have some more by playing those rewards of mine.

I think this is also a strategy of the gambling sites, so users would be able tempted to play those rewards.  ;D

Of course, most people will do it, especially those who gamble easily without good self-control, seeing that their account has a balance in the casino, they will gamble, at least they will be tempted by the game and think about trying their luck, this thought will come in passing after the signature payment is no longer in your casino wallet.

Nope. If I remember correctly, I have about 6,000 dollars on my casino balance and I don’t touch it. I have a separate budget for gambling and I have no problems sticking to it. And I can’t say that I’ve disciplined myself too much or anything like that, it’s just that for me, not spending the money that I have on my balance is not difficult at all. I don't like gambling enough to spend unplanned money on it.

I used to get paid in my casino account by signature campaigns in the past, but I would say it depends on an individual and what they have in mind in general. If you are someone who loves gambling, you might get tempted when you see the balance in your casino account, and then you might think of making a few bets with it while it's there because then if you want to gamble later anyway so you will have to make a deposit again and pay deposit fees, etc.

On the other hand, someone who has a clear vision for their money and they know they have to use it for something else, let's say someone is saving Bitcoin from their signature earnings, and they deposit the whole payment in a non-custodial wallet they have created only for this purpose. Such a person will never gamble with the money even if they are receiving it in their casino account.

Since I'm currently getting paid directly into my wallet, I don't do that, but in the past, I used to do both, gamble with a small amount, and withdraw the rest to keep it balanced.

Yes. But I only spent a few bucks betting. Before, I really spent a lot on slots, especially after winning a max win. I thought to myself that I might repeat the same thing, and as time flies by, I just use the money in sports betting and sometimes Plinko.

There's money available. It truly can urge you to gamble, and I think it's okay because we worked for it. As long as we don't badly need that money, then gamble it. In sports betting, it will take a while before I deplete the amount paid in the signature campaign.

I think that's the idea. It is definitely more tempting to play when you get payments directly credited into your casino account. Obviously, the choice to play or not entirely rests on you, but for someone who gambles regularly, it would be a welcome relationship.
It's also a subtle way to get players to try out some of the services of the casino. Not exactly a bad idea too to try out some of the services offered by the casino as we're literally helping to market their services.

Several times it was mentioned here that the payout couldn't be withdrawn without placing a bet. But no one has named a specific casino that had such rules. Can you provide examples?

Paying directly to your account directly breaks an important entry barrier, and although it seems that some people here are immune to it, I have to admit that I've used a part of my payment to test the casino whose signature I was wearing, if not for pure curiosity. But just a little part, in my case, and it was several years ago.

There was a case in the forum where the minimum withdrawal was higher than the signature weekly payment, and many people frowned at it. The best option was to wait and receive more than one weekly payment before withdrawal ( if the campaign lasts more than one week).

Back to the topic, it is tempting for gamblers to receive payments in casinos. The temptation is even higher if it is a reputable casino that has many enticing offers. But if the forum is not a source of income, using just signature earnings for gambling is a smart move.

I've been playing in casinos before and joining the signature campaign with casino make them provide my need for the bank roll.
In addition I joined several to many casinos just to join programs and contest. As for me is a bit successful not to deposit to gambling with my own money but the rewards from them :)

Literally, making signature campaign payments directly to your casino account can make you gamble more as a gambler because when you open the casino, you might see some events that you will be tempted to bet on even when you didn't have the intentions to stake a bet at that particular time. Though it all depends on how disciplined you are because i know that there are people who don't bet games on casinos platforms even though they earn from advertising them. Am not against casinos making signature campaign payments directly on participants casino accounts, it's also a kind of business strategy since they make money from withdrawal charges but i do frown at casinos who charge extremely high amount on withdrawals, it's not good.

I think it will have significant impact, as a gambler, even those who just play for leisure might have the tendency to gamble their signature payment. It's that psychology in gambler that if we have money then we most of us here would want to play it right away.

When I started here, I joined a campaign that pays me direct into our account. And with that, I just gamble it right away. Maybe I withdraw just a couple of times. But I will say that I did fall for it and gambling like every week until the campaign ends.

Same here. It’s very hard to resist gambling if you have funds on your casino. The struggle intensifies if you have some kind of thinking that you need to make your balance first a round number before you withdraw.

For example if you earn 65$ on campaign. You have an urge to earn at least 5$ to make your money round up to 70$ before you withdraw.

Even a simple target of earning profit to cover transaction fee is sometimes being used as an excuse to gamble.

I’m thinking the same; you don’t need to deposit, and it’s the casino that rewards you and the one you trust. You won't promote a casino that you don’t trust, so I’m okay with it. It's hard to resist the temptation to play.
I used to promote a casino that paid me into my account. I have done it many times, but of course, you have to play with money that you can afford to lose, so if I don’t need to spend on something, I’ll go for it.

Well this is another means by which users can be luered to gamble. Beside that was the initial reason for the campaign payments to be made their, so yiu can make a choice to either gamble or make withdrawal immediately payments are received for the week. We as the user has the power to make our choices. You can decide to either not gamble or gamble.

 Another is that you can decide not to participate in such signature campaign if you are the kind that is easily lured to play a few games, probably because you might get motivated to double the weekly payments.

Yea, not fan of strings attached payouts to casino wallets but otherwise it's fine.


I do have those tendencies, but thankfully I have wisen myself enough to not follow 'em in gambling.


Very wise!  /s

I will definitely gamble at a casino that pays me, of course this is a form of support, showing that we care about the casino that we carry in our signature, not just lip service, even though I receive it in my wallet I will send some to enjoy gambling games.

Good for you.

I learned the hard way before until I master the self control on not using to gamble my funds that is sent directly to casino.

I’m sure many here is struggling to snap out on this simple gambling dilemma now that casino often sent payment to casino balance to save transaction fees for them and at the same time encourage their participants to try the casino.

Agree, because you will never know what's happening if you didn't test those games available on their casino and you cannot contribute anything on the discussions happening in their ann thread if that case happened.

Somehow its good to patronize those campaigns paying you since its like saying you are thankful for being added in their campaign. But I'm sure people don't need to get worried if they don't like to play and want to cash out their earnings. Since if the campaigns didn't have a condition like they are required to gamble using minimal amount I guess they are fine if they want to withdraw the amount they earn from their campaign.

We are not forced to gamble, but I think receiving payment into our casino account says something. Of course, the option remains, but we can't deny the fact that this encourages us to gamble. However, we're old enough not to know what the deal is. We can skip using the casino if we can't find our favorite game. That is easy, isn't it?

Well, it doesn't really matter if we are participating in gambling signature campaigns or not. As gamblers, it is going to happen whenever we want it. But I assume that all who participate in gambling signature campaigns are gamblers.

It all depends on the gambler mindset and urge towards gambling. Some gamblers might only want to try a few game because there's funds in their account from signature campaign but will end up gambling almost everything. It all boils down to self control and discipline. I haven't participated in a signature campaign that pays directly to the casino account but I don't see it as an excuse for anyone to gamble when he does not want to.

If you gamble whenever you have money, it means that you will not be able to manage your income because you are putting gambling first in your life instead of your major responsibility. What about gamblers that keeps their weekly gambling budget in the casino account and wouldn't gamble only when they want to. Maybe, any gambler that uses his signature campaign money to gamble because he was paid directly to the casino account does not have any important thing to use the money for.

Well, it is possible for signature payment to be the reason why one starts gambling, and for those who know what they are doing and understand gambling, it won't be a problem for them because they will only gamble with the money that they can afford to lose.

Receiving payment from a casino shouldn't be the reason why one should gamble responsibly, even if payment from the casino is the reason one is gambling. Normally, as one who is promoting a signature campaign, it is possible to make an attempt to gamble, but the most important thing is to have a better knowledge of gambling so that exposure to the gambling environment shouldn't be the reason for gambling.

I remembered that issue and how some of the participants even took the case to the reputation board siting that the withdrawal fee they were supposed to pay together with the payment being lower than the minimum withdrawal was a bit frustrating to them. I don't know how the matter ended though but it generate arguments with some people supporting the casino and some against them.

This is another good point you have made. If the earning from signature campaign can be channeled into gambling, and the user have other jobs, it will be great and just one major win will make him recover months of the signature earning. This will really be a huge relief and something I will give a thought. Although what I gamble with some weeks is more than what I earn in signature campaign but not above my budget.

Having my campaign payment paid into gambling account will help me some how regulate how much is available to gamble with. If i receive $65 per week, my bankroll for the week should be the extra $5 on top of $65 while i withdraw $60. Receiving to the casino directly will make you gamble without intention, based on individual discipline the whole situation can be controlled.

Stake pays it's participants directly on their account but I only gamble when I feel like, although I have the desire to wager every week but I don't and that's because I have that discipline to gamble only when I have time to do so and when I am also ready to allocate some money for it, it could be just a week in a month or two weeks but not every week.

Does not humans have a variety of mindset in doing something activities including funds that enter the casino account from the campaign, I think everyone has the principle of how they use the budget.

Indeed, campaign funds go to a tempting casino account, what else there are games that we think have a good opportunity, there is no harm in using some cents for betting, I personally of course I will Staying in the casino too, but I see also good opportunities, not rash in using the budget.

If you are promoting a casino signature campaign and they are paying into your account in their casino, you don't know what they have done for you. You are being saved lots of stress and paying unnecessary charges of adding money into your account to gamble. They want to make things very easy for you, and you shouldn't see it as a strategy from the casino to lure you into gambling. Fine and good you are a gambler and you are going to gamble one way or the other. Why not remove the amount you will gamble with and withdraw the balance. Or would you prefer promoting another casino and gambling elsewhere? I think it's more like practice what you preach.

I also receive direct signature payments at the casino. The situation may not encourage me to gamble right away, but it makes it easier for me when I do want to gamble and I have a balance in my account ready to be wagered without having to make a deposit.
Sometimes, when I don't want to gamble or the balance in my casino account is still enough to start a betting session, I will withdraw the payment. But more often I spend it on gambling.

I'm sure all members who participated in the campaign have played with the weekly payouts that were deposited into their casino accounts. I do, too, but not always. Sometimes, when I need money to buy something, I'll withdraw all of it. Sometimes, I'll withdraw some and use the rest to play my favorite games from PGsoft.
But honestly, lately, I've been withdrawing all of my payouts more often due to my increasing needs. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. The point is, members are free to use their payouts to play or withdraw them all.

Libert, having your winnings deposited directly into your casino account?  Since it eliminates all of the inherent pain points associated with sending money, that is a powerful incentive to spend.  You are much more likely to spend money & lose more when it is already in your gambling account.  On the other hand, it causes friction & makes you reconsider if you have it in your Bitcoin wallet.

Kudos to KTChampions for maintaining that mental distance between your fun budget & the rest.  I think people who could wait to cash out that  huge amount are less likely to overspend, and that is good self control.  However, most people find it easier to navigate cashless money on a screen.

As long as we can do whatever we want with the payment, it doesn't matter where it's sent. It's up to us whether we decide to gamble with that money or not. Although we can't fool ourselves, that's an incentive to gamble. That is, having the money already in the casino, if you were unsure whether to gamble or not, is a little more tempting than the idea of ​​​​loading your balance at the casino on your own.

But in the end, it's still a personal decision whether you want to gamble or not, because I like to think they don't force you to gamble in order to make the withdrawal.

Since the first day I joined a signature campaign I have not received any payments directly to a casino account (although this will make me 2 weeks joining a signature campaign) because the managers don't pay to the casino account but I since they normally pay to my Bitcoin wallet address which I provide. It will be nice to gamble with signature campaign payments once in a while because "Why Not? But the real truth is that it is not everytime that the campaign participants will gamble with their payments, sometimes they add it to their anonymous wallets to increase the asset on their portfolio. It's not a must to gamble with payment , you can do anything you want with it.

Not really. Sure, I might get tempted sometimes, but I don’t usually spend all my earnings in a casino even if they’re credited there. Even if it’s not “hard earned” money, it’s still Bitcoin, and I’d rather hold it and let the value grow long term.

I also think most campaigners don’t gamble their rewards either, since a lot of signature campaigns nowadays don’t pay directly into casino accounts.
That just shows casinos don’t see it as effective to credit participants there to make them gamble.

If i am accepted into a signature campaign where i will receive my payment directly to the casino website, i will not use it to gamble so that i will not be tempted any week to use all my payment to gamble. But if the money is not up to the minimum withdrawal of the casino, i will try to gamble with it if i can increase the money to reach the minimum withdrawal of the casino so that i will have a chance of withdrawing my money to my personal wallet, but i can decide to withdraw my money bi-weekly if i am not certain of increasing  the money to the minimum withdrawal of the casino.

My only issue with that is that there's always a limit that's set below which you can't make your withdrawal. So for instance if you only participated in the campaign for just a week and the pay is not upto the minimum withdrawal amount, you have to either use It to gamble or made an extra deposit for you to be given access to withdraw or spend your fund.

Obviously, it's a strategy of using one stone to kill two or more birds since on the  one hand, you're promoting them on the forum and all promoters are kind of direct users of Thier platform. Some might just spend it while others will want to use It to get more money which if they lose it means that the campaign has gotten it money back. It's just left for you to choose what to do with your paid money. It's not a must that you must use It on Thier platform.

Participants in the campaign are not required to sign up for direct payment to a casino account to play that is up to the individual but it makes more sense to play because you have to experience what is being promoted.

It doesn't matter if you only use $10-$20 to play and withdraw the rest, but I usually spend about 20% of the total campaign income on casino betting.

So far, we've only bet about 20% on sports betting, and the rest goes towards food or other necessities. ;D
With 20% used for betting, that's more than enough for now.

Like him, there's also a time where I've being paid directly into my account on that Casino.
First was Yolodice back in 2018-2019 I think, and then there's Stake.

Well, I'm using a portion of those signature campaign payments to gamble because... why not? :D I mean if you see a balance in your account, you will always be tempted to use that to gamble hoping to make more money, right? Now that I'm being paid directly thru my own wallet, there are times where I don't use that money to gamble for personal reasons.

Looking at the current signature campaigns that are currently running, there are only few of them where the participants are being paid thru their own gambling website's account. Stake and I think even Jackbit and Crypto.games are the ones, and most of them are thru their own wallets. Whether it's on our personal wallet, or casino account, for me it doesn't matter because if you feel that you need to gamble, you will just use that money for gambling. :D

No doubt its an strategy by the sponsors of the signature campaign to make the participants try the platform. At least test the withdrawal option. And for most, they'd certainly try something just to experience what they are advertising. People might be unwillingly losing their reward when they feel they ought to try gambling but no one is actually forcing you to do it. I don't think any of the gambling signature campaign has a minimum playing amount before withdrawal. If you don't reach the minimum withdrawal requirement, you could just wait for the next weeks payment and in another argument, you should also be well informed of what you are advertising for.

I agree with this, but in my case I do sometimes gamble with a small amount, not the whole payment, because I use the weekly payment on trading and convert it to USDT and get benefits from holding it on the exchange, and I use some for doing tasks like depositing BTC and getting free airdrops. Exchange offers these and get free rewards every week. That's way more guaranteed profit than gambling, but I still try my luck sometimes while having fun.

I saw you had accusation of using AI in reputation board, is that why you are referring to us individually, so you are not flagged for using AI?  ;D

I respect individual choices. But the idea of gambling using a pay into the casino is wrong to me, and I cant back down on my words. It is obvious they no longer adhere to bankroll management.

The only reason I can accept that idea is if they derive their bankroll from the pay and send the rest out.

Why not? I personally use it for betting or playing slots, hoping to win more when I withdraw but of course I only use a few cents. Essentially before I start playing, I'll withdraw the weekly payout from the campaign early to avoid the temptation to gamble longer. Ultimately it's your decision whether to withdraw it all or use it for gambling, as the payer gives you that flexibility.

This is a good move to guarantee that you will not risk the money that you hard earned through posting here in forum. Usually, user will play a few bets before they withdraw the while money because they consider the transaction fees since salary on signature campaign is Bitcoin while the fee on this currency is high.

I wouldn’t mind placing few bets before I withdraw if I received the funds on my casino account during my free time.

Most of my funds that I acquired through signature campaign is I use for casino purposes.

I'm aware that some gambling sig campaigns pay directly into members casino wallets but then hope you know that gambling is a choice and not compulsory for everyone well if the casino requires one to wager or bet before withdrawal then it's enough for them to complain since they don't want to gamble but the casino is leading them to it, but then when there's no requirement for withdrawal then I don't see any issues with paying directly to their casino wallets since gambling is a choice and shouldn't be by force on anyone whether directly or indirectly.

The motivation for different people gambling is different and while receiving your signature payments into your casino account may make gambling easier for you, there are still many signature campaign participants who have not made it turn them into irresponsible gamblers who are gambling without control and budget. I don't think it is the entire plan of any casino running a signature campaign in this forum and paying directly to their platform that each gambler they pay uses the money in gambling on their platform to the extent that they become addicts. They just want you to constantly try out their withdrawal services so that you can recommend them to other gamblers seeking casinos with efficient withdrawals.

As long as we have no problem with that, why not? I could do the same thing, even though for now I am still paid in bitcoin, not directly to the casino, but if that happens, then I can do that.

But on the other hand, I also won't use all the money I earn from the campaign for gambling because, to be honest, it slightly violates the limits I currently have in terms of the amount I have to spend each week.
Therefore, I will still withdraw a portion but leave the rest in line with the limits I always set for myself—not exceeding that amount, even though the money comes from the same gambling signature campaign. Of course, the choice is up to each individual, and I certainly don't expect the entire amount I receive to be spent, because if this habit develops, it will be dangerous for me.

I used to be part of a signature campaign that paid directly into my account in their casino in the past, but I don't really get the urge to gamble just because "I can" or have funds in the casino. But there were times I didn't withdraw the payment and use that fund for my gambling session since I thought it was more practical than depositing in the casino from my wallet.

It proves that you have total control with your gambling urges if you can’t be tempted to play if you don’t have plan to gamble while your funds is already there.

For some user it’s very hard to control the urge of gambling if they have the opportunity to do it. I believe there’s already a thread before that share his experience about his gambling addiction and how the frequent browsing in the casino makes him to urge more on gambling.

Same like you, I’m not that having urge to gamble if I don’t really feel to play. In my case, I don’t have time to gamble whenever I want due to my work load.

I think it's a way to get you to use the casino, even if it's just with a little of what you received. It's great for you to give your opinion about the features, how withdrawals work, and talk about the games available. Although managers say that posting in the casino's ANN threads isn't mandatory, it's desirable to have interaction in them, and this is a way to generate this engagement.

Whether or not to bet is a choice, you are certainly not obliged to do so, unless you need to meet wagering requirements to withdraw, in which case I don't think it's viable, as your intention won't always be to bet.

This is all about what we want or have decided to do, receiving payment on the casino wallet does not mean anything, if we want to gamble, we are going to use it for the purpose, either the entire payment or part of it, secondly, we have to consider if it were to be sent to our personal wallet, nothing still changes, because we can still send to our casino for gambling, while receiving it on our wallet already save some gamblers from transaction fees, whereby they have to send fund to their casino wallet.

Well I don't understand why people are calling users who gamble since the money are on their accounts as "low self control".

What's wrong for someone who gamble small amount of money from the effort they spent for a week? it's not even low self control, it's responsible. As long as they don't gamble excess than what they get or the money supposed to be used for emergency needs, it's completely fine.

Signature campaign is actually a promotion casinos make in other to create awareness for their services to the gambling community, and as such, some may choose to make payment directly into their casino account, simply because they just want it's participants get use to it, and likewise other casinos that may choose to sent payment directly to the participants Bitcoin wallet, but thou encourages it's participants to gamble on the casino they are promoting. So when it comes to the question if does depositing payment on a casino make a user gamble? Then literally, it is a personal decision, but of course, its still it wouldn't be bad if the gambler can spare a fraction of his payment to gamble, while testing the casino features.

Why not? It's perfectly acceptable for signature campaign participants to spend some or all of their payment directly at the casino if they really want to. Rather than depositing from another wallet, I think it's easier for most gamblers to spend 50% of their campaign payment at the casino directly. Some participants might withdraw 100% for various financial reasons, but that's not their fault. It's up to the participants how they want to do it - the point is the casino never forbids it from being done.

That's right, there's nothing wrong with doing it just for entertainment, the important thing is not to go overboard. But if there are other needs that must be met, then it's better to rearrange your priorities. Gambling can be done at any time, by setting personal limits, you can take control of your gambling journey.

I think allocating ten percent of a payment is very reasonable. If you're lucky, you can enjoy a bigger win and make a larger withdrawal. But if not, then it should be considered a form of entertainment. I think it all comes back to each individual, but I'm sure many people have done it.

I would prefer to receive signature campaign earnings directly to my BTC address, but i don't also mind receiving my signature earnings directly to the casino making the payment, especially if there is no wagering requirement and if withdrawal fee is low. I make sure to gamble in any casino i advertise, so even if i receive funds in my wallet, i move some funds to the casino when i want to gamble. I am advertising Whale.io now and that is where i gamble, even though i receive payments into my wallet.

I have once received my signature campaign payment direct to the casino site, but I was not comfortable with it not because it will make me gamble with my payment, because even receiving my payment direct to the casino site can't make me gamble with my signature campaign payment, just that I wasn't just comfortable with receiving my payment direct to the gambling site and even  the charges is something else. Right now am receiving my signature campaign payment direct to my bitcoin wallet which am comfortable with that one.

Decipline and determination is what make the difference, i still remember when i was in campaign that make my weekly payments into my casino accounts and as time goes on i started using that money to gamble i first set aside $10 each week but as time goes on I began to use my whole week payments to gamble and without any results or winning, this made me to have a rethink and startedto look away from gambling each or eventually changing signature campaign to avoid getting my payments into my casino account which causes the temptations to gamble them away.

I never saw this as something that could encourage more people to play, because even if people received it in their wallet, they could easily deposit it in the casino. For example, I've been placing sports bets, I bet using Litecoin deposits and also USDC when I receive payment, so I don't see anything wrong with receiving it directly into the casino account. When someone is responsible, there won't be a problem. Now, if the person already has a gambling problem, then that person will use everything they received and gamble.

There was a time when we received our payment in our casino account and normally we were supposed to be given the opportunity to withdraw without having to meet any wagering requirements but it wasn’t as we expected so we had to wager it just once, although, we were compensated for it the following week and that was how we stopped using it.

And again, seeing your money in your gambling account is really tempting and even if you manage to take some out of the account you’ll still want to leave some behind just to gmable, so I think receiving your payment via casino account will make you gamble even when you don’t want to.

if you are receiving your signature payment directly to your casino account that will prompt you to spend more than your expectation in gambling because it will be easier for you to make your bet through the casino platform, but for the aspect of people who is betting because of they are into signature payment, that should be a true story because sometimes does people who have the mindset to gamble will but they don't have the capital, and immediately they started in Bitcoin they have the privilege to make a deposit to a casino platforms that will give them access to make their bet, because there's some people who does not know how to buy Bitcoin and fund to the platform.

Is there any difference in receiving payment on gambling site and receiving payment in our bitcoin wallet? If you really want to gamble, then you still going to do it, depositing money on gambling site is something that’s so easy, so even after receiving payment in our bitcoin wallet, then we can still easily deposit on gambling site.

You might be receiving your weekly payment on the gambling site and you might still decide not to gamble with it, gambling is all about self control, if you can control yourself, then anywhere you receive your payment, you not still going to gamble with the money. I think it’s even better we receive our payment on gambling site, at least we should try out the gambling site which we promoting, I don’t see anything wrong with that, as long as their won’t be any additional charges attached to withdrawal, then it’s a good idea.

Whichever way a payments is done a gambler with irresistible gambling habits would still gamble having been paid directly to the casino and certainly why won't you give in a little, there'll always be this thoughts of wanting to do a little gambling just for fun but all of this depends on one's decision, basically receiving payment through that medium and be discipline enough not to spend a dime.

This might be a wrong move for anyone, I know that getting your signature pay straight into your casino account might propel you to gamble but you must be careful and learn to apply wisdom...as a stake participant even though I do gamble when I receive payment sometimes I make sure that it's just a little percentage that goes into gambling, throwing away all your payments is actually stupid thats why you must exercise self control

It's a trap lol  ;D 8) , you're going to f***king keep gambling as long as you have it paid directly there, that's for me! I don't know about others but I did do such in my first or campaign payment, still have some left over to keep watering but I gave up since no win came in.

It's very difficult for someone like me to see a spin and win opportunity in a casino when I have some amount of money in there and knowing fully well that even if I used 50% of the pay to gambling it wouldn't affect me in any way so I just gamble and when I'm feed up or have exhausted the set outside amount to wager I just quit.

That is true, it is up to you if you will deplete your campaign payments to the casino. Yes, you can always play as it is quite easy to access. You don't need to deposit as the money is already there, but how much you will spend depend on you. But yes, if you have that money already in the casino, you can really play for a bit but not to the point that you will lose it all. Just think of the days that you put effort to get such amount. And you will lose it for few minutes. You need to plan and be strict with yourself when you get such payment.

My answer is yes. And it's more or less expected. You're very much exposed to gambling because you're promoting a gambling site, you're discussing about gambling topics everyday, you're betting, and so on. And you're paid directly to your casino account's wallet. The money is already there. It's very difficult not to gamble at least a portion of it. Not to mention that you're probably also interested to try playing in the casino you're promoting.

It's more tempting to gamble this way than you taking the effort to create an account or make a deposit first.

Who knows maybe there is a forum member here who does that. Using our signature campaign payment to fuel our gambling activities is not a bad idea if our other priorities is well taken care off excluding the amount we get weekly.

I myself is also guilty doing it since you have nothing else to do and the amount you need to gamble is automatically deposited to your account. Usually I do this at the end of the month where all bills are paid and my salary is being divided until next salary. What I have remaining on my gambling account is mine to enjoy and I usually pay my luck on slots or dice.

The only reason I would spend my campaign payment on gambling no matter or regardless of where it is paid is if i don't have any very important thing to do with the money, then in a situation like this, receiving the payment on a casino is even preferred as it saves me the stress of trying to deposit to the casino again.

But in times when I have a lot of things requiring financial attention and I imagined that my campaign payment would go along way in helping me settle those financial issues, I would withdraw the money even if it was paid into my casino account.
I think it's once (if I still remember correctly) I lost my entire campaign fund on gambling because it was paid directly to my account on the casino, since then, I sometimes would spend a small part of the fund, then withdraw the rest if I am not winning, but In times of financial issues, I withdraw without spending any part of the fund on any game.

When everything is set to encourage members for playing gambling then still avoiding is near to zero percent for me because few are having rule you have to wager 1 time which is more problematic even many avoid these rules because they understand, but things like these always for encouraging to gamble.

Here most of the peoples are having different needs and way of life few strictly avoid this despite they understand they are promoting and working for casino, but they have other things in life which are more important than gambling but many loves to take this advantage because they feel they can do this also have chance of keeping things on level which will not hurt them financial which is always preferable.

Yeah, I think that's quite self evident, and the reason why some campaigns choose to do it like that.

At a minimum you would be paying the mining fees to move it to your own wallet (if it's paid into a wallet you don't control).

So, based on that some people might prefer to just gamble it directly, skipping the fees.

But in the end, the most probable outcome is to lose it while gambling.

Sure, I use my signature payment to gamble. When else can we double our weekly paycheck for a small profit? But I don't use it all at once, just 50%, and I always use it for sports betting to enjoy the thrill of football betting and try my luck. And sometimes I use it to bet on poker to make a small profit.

I am just like you too, if I want to spend some bucks on gambling after receiving pay, I will have to withdraw the amount that I don't wish to spend on gambling and after doing so, that is when I can start gambling with amount I left behind and the reason for doing that is to avoid the temptation of spending all. It's not bad if someone is allocating some bucks for gambling every week if they want but it depends on how frequent the person gambles too.

This is a smart move to avoid the temptation of gambling off all of your campaign payments.  The challenge might be the discipline to withdraw it after receiving the money. You might just want to try how lucky you are and it might lead to using all the funds. I gamble mostly during weekends, and from my personal experience, getting paid from a casino has not affected my gambling activity negatively.

I withdraw my payments immediately I receive It because I know that if I leave it for longer durations I might be tempted to try out some casino games, it's possible that in the process of exploring you might even end up making more money but I don't joke with my campaign payments. I always write out the list of things that I need to settle, seeing this always reminds me that I don't have to joke with even a penny that comes

Yes, that's my own answer to the question. I would be prompted to gambling more if that were the case with my signature campaign. Would it have been worth it, well I guess not but it would require stoic discipline to not use some portion of it every week for gambling. But I am glad it isn't. That gives me freedom to choose when to gamble.

For several years, I used most of my payment from signature campaign as my main fund source for my gambling habit and there was so low amount that I have spent from my own wallet.
Whether I received the campaign payment directly to casino account or to my own wallet, I used to use it for my gambling most of the time.
However I have changed since last year since I reduced my gambling activity a lot for a reason, so it is rare now for me to use my payment from the campaign to gamble.

Hahaha you have just hit the nail on the head i mean what you said have a deeper meaning to those who understood the language of gambling too well, there is no point going else where when you are already in a place and position of getting what you want unless maybe the casino doesn't display the kind of games you want and that is a different stories entirely and secondly gambling is never mandatory it is still your choice to gamble or not even the campaign payments are made to your casino account, it is individual decision to gamble even when the pay doesn't reach the minimum withdrawal there is nothing wrong waiting to get to the minimum withdrawal amount and withdrawal you payments if you don't want to gamble that's so simple.

I gambled before joining the signature campaign I am currently in, though I had not gambled in a long time before joining into it.
Yes, I would say belonging to a signature campaign indeed influences on the chances of one becoming an active gambler in those casinos one is advertising in a passive way with our signature.

In general I also like to test whatever I promote, so I took the initiative to break my hiatus and gamble on stake to see how good is was, right after getting into their signature campaign, so far I am satisfied with my experience with them, I would be quite hypocritical of me to recommend something I had never touched with my very own hands. I think it is better this way.

yeah for me campaign payment that is directly deposited into my casino account is a powerful inducement to play.  most often prepaid & raindrop balances encourage hedonistic spending, windfalls & designated funds are given a feeling like house money & can be spent more freely. when i get payment directly to my casino account it lessen the pain and hassle of depositing by my own, which also encourages me to gamble more & more quickly.  In essence, depositing a signature payment into a casino account is giving temptation a free pass.

Duke Khan

If gamblers see money on their casino platform, I can definitely say that they can gamble there for some time. Even if they don't play today, they will play at some time. But for those who don't gamble, it's a completely different matter. But casino platforms, I think, use their own platforms for two reasons. That is, the convenience of paying and the interest of gamblers in gambling will be created there. It will completely depend on the gambler himself. But in general, if we see that if there is money on a casino platform, the gambler can be ready to bet. He can easily participate in the bet. I think the casino prefers to pay for the convenience of doing it on their own platform rather than profit.

I think the issue of payment to the casino site account does not matter much here, I myself am constantly receiving signature campaign payments from jackclub to my jacklcub account, but I have wagered very rarely here with this account. Rather if there is any need for that I have created another account but I have wagered very little with this one.

And besides, I think it's also a matter of self-control, and at the same time I also think that gambling is not a crime, most of us here gamble more or less. But we have to remember that it should be beyond our control to lose, then whether it is given as a signature payment or in some other way, it doesn't matter.

I am not touching my signature pay because I am trying to set an example that it is better to hodl your coins. I would rather use my fiat to gamble because unlike Bitcoin, it will go down in value over time. So I would rather not have fiat than not have Bitcoin is basically my motivation.

Also I have my own rules in place to prevent myself from spending too much money on gambling. They also prevent me from touching my Bitcoins. I would rather use other crypto or better yet, as I said, fiat.

It's okay to gamble when you have a balance in your casino account from your signature campaign payout, but you shouldn't forget the risk of losing when your motivation is to double it. A loss can result in a partial or complete loss of your balance, but if you're really lucky, you could double it. My motivation is not about doubling my balance, but to have fun and this keeps me in control.

At some point one definitely will spend the bitcoin you holdling the basic thing is to make sure that you spend it doing thebright thing, i understand that decipline is very important, bit then also avoiding the temptation that comes with having  a large balance on your casinos account is quite risky to start with, that the reason i avoid signatures campaign that make direct deposit into your casino account like stake.

It is tempting to play on the platform when there is a fund in it so yeah, payment in the platform makes me play at the casino but I make sure that I withdraw the needed fund first before playing.

I know from experience that sometimes even if we think that we will just play a certain percentage of the payment, we sometimes do not follow it and eventually empty out our bankroll.  So to be on the safer side, just leave the amount we wanted to spend and withdraw the rest.

Of course what the casino is doing is just an invitation t treat. It's just like someone standing in a bus stop, commercial vehicles will stop for you trying to offer their services to you, they won't force you enter their bus but they are willing to serve you if you decide to use their service. That's what the casino is just doing. Since you are a gambler let's make it more easy for you to gamble but it is not mandatory to gamble with us, if you don't  want to gamble with us at the end of the day, you can still withdraw your money no offence. I don't know of others, but I would definitely like the idea of working with such casinos that offer such services in the future, because I know what I go through in funding my online gambling account. Sometimes I lose the urge of gambling when I remember the process I will have to go through just to fund my account.

Recently I discovered that the Stake signature campaign actually pays its participants directly to their online casino accounts.
And although these guys can easily withdraw this money, nevertheless the casino helped them go halfway to making a bet, because there is no need to look for a reliable casino and no need to figure out how to deposit money into the balance, because it is all already done.
And Stake is one of the oldest signature campaigns on our forum, which is clearly a reliable representative of the online casino.

Same thing for me as well, even if I decide to gamble I only use a little percentage that won't mean much to me when I lose it. Gambling with your signature pay is very risky because especially if your pay in your casino account, once you start it's going to be difficult to stop and at the long run you might not achieve anything after receiving those amounts of money on a weekly basis. Your budget should be separate from this

I don`t see any problem to deposit money to casino i prefer.
When casino give you money to your bankroll in this casino it is not fair as for me. I made the job, they paid me for it. I decide how to spend these money myself. To be fair, mostly i can withdraw money, but it is one additional step i have to do. For somebody it would be more easier to spend money right now in this casino.
But the same time, everybody of us can read the campaign description and if we participate it means that we agree with such conditions.

They do not give any wagering requirement to withdraw the money from the signature campaign, so anyone can withdraw it immediately. Now if someone starts gambling with that money, it is their own personal matter. I myself received a payment from a site of $30, I played Dice with them on their site and there I withdrew the balance by 2x. This is everyone's personal matter. I myself am not against it. I also have such an experience that I received the money from the signature campaign and gambled with it. But I was lucky that I was able to withdraw my balance by doubling it.

Of course, this is very tempting, especially for those who enjoy gambling and have funds available from campaign payouts at participating casinos.
And I'm sure all of us here consider campaign payouts as a side hustle or extra income to supplement our existing finances, or for other reasons because we need it and signed up. And if we enjoy gambling, we should prioritize withdrawing most of our winnings and only keep a small portion to gamble just for fun, hoping to double it if we get lucky.
However, it all depends on the individual, and they have the right to do whatever they want with their money. Personally, I always divide my campaign payouts 20% for gambling at participating casinos and 80% for withdrawals to help ease my finances and also to increase or enhance my investments, and it has been very helpful.

If you check very well, there could be more reason to it but the most important is payment, some casino don't like an external manager to handle the distribution of payments to signature participants probably because of trust reasons or others best known to them but it's also an opportunity for the participants to make use of the casino. I mean they are indirectly making promotional for the company, it's going to be a very good idea to have a good use of what they are showing others.

What I don't like about direct payment is the fee they charge from people, it's improper to pay your promoters money and ask them to pay for the fees. Some do white-list participants so they don't pay the fees but majorly they asked for withdrawal fees. There is one casino on that service board right now doing campaign and asking participants for $6 Bitcoin withdrawal fee, that's absurd thing to do; even if they are not going to allow free, $1 is enough to pay anyone there money.

The decision to pay for the campaign was made by mutual agreement between the manager and the casino itself... so this rule is clear.

Payments to casino accounts are not a problem and there are no restrictions on playing you can withdraw whenever you want that's what I've seen in several active campaigns.

It could be that signature campaigns pay into casino accounts to encourage players to keep playing... but the decision is still in your own hands.

I was in a signature campaign SWC poker, and they sent payment on their platform. Usually I loved to play poker games. So whenver I did received my payment I used to play games. If I won some extra chips there I always do gamble more. For me it was fun , like come-on I'm still on profit zone. As long as I've these extra winnings no fears to lose some. Which basically leads me to play poker on their platform regular.

One more thing if you do use their platform regular you will used to know about them. So from next time you can suggest someone boldly that platform. Which I found casino site owner's fabour. So year Ig they do this for their own sake

Casino makes me(if i lazy enough) to choose it to continue the game. May be some wager requirements. May be some commissions to withdraw money. It`s just additional step and may be some expenses. It is the way, how casino get some additional clients.
And i repeat. For me - it is unfair, some very-very small cheating from casino. But when you decide to participate - you agree with such conditions. I try to avoid such campaigns, and you can decide what to do in such situation yourself.

In the past yes but now I'm not using any of it for gambling since BTC is surging right now. I'm using solana or ethereum for gambling or sometimes USDT so that I can have fixed wins and losses. I don't want to add up another loss when gambling using a volatile asset. So yah, It's a good tactic from their side because if we lose, those money will just go back to them but for me, I have a separate allocation for gambling and investments. But back then, I used to be because I want to try it but after that, I don't have intentions on using it.