Does sign campaign payments directly to the casino make you to gamble?

[libert19]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

[shield132]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

When I was in Bitsler's signature campaign, in the first weeks we were getting paid on Bitsler's account. The owner was also giving us additional money for paying withdrawal fees. I've gambled with that money and I think that the purpose of account deposit was to make us gamble because that really makes sense but I might be wrong. Bitsler was paying me so much for that time and I was forcing myself to lose money sometimes. Btw to be fair, now I'm in Metawin's signature campaign, I get paid on my account and sometimes I deposit money from my account to Metawin's account to gamble and have some fun. So for me, it doesn't matter whether I get payments directly on my casino account or on my wallet, if I want to gamble, I gamble and if I don't want to gamble, I don't gamble, as easy as ABC.

[TopTort777]

I dont remember receiving signature campaign reward directly on a casino balance, but, if I would have received it, I think I would have gambled Because yeah, why not? Couple of small bets, once a week wont hurt. I dont think anyone would dumb all of his weekly reward at once in gambling. I dont think that casinos do that on purpose (however they have that in mind). Imho they do it to make casino more popular, more remembering.

[Agbamoni]

Just like in the content of OP, I am a stake participant and I do receive my pay in my stake account but never have i used it to gamble. The thing is, I am more of a sports bettor and I'm comfortable betting in local sportsbook using fiat.

At the same time, gambling with your signature pay might force you to go against your bankroll management. Which is one mistake I wouldn't want to do.

[DPHOR]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Well there was a signature campaign I participated and it was only for a week, when I joined the payment was sent directly to their gambling site and there are requirements which one must meet to enable them make withdrawal, this condition aren't stated on their signature thread but after payment and I wanted to withdraw I noticed that I must reached a certain threshold for me to be able to have my funds withdrawn.

And of course, it's like a compulsive gambling where the said user has to gamble to meet their requirements to be able to make withdrawal so I had to gamble with such amount sent to gamble site, I was actually lucky enough to had winning and meet up their requirements to be able to withdraw my funds. Most times signature campaign payment sent to their gambling site are indirectly want to gamble and want to take back their payment back to them because they knew that gamblers must lose while gambling.

[Jawhead999]

Yeah I think it's make sense and it's not about how much you get paid.

Even though the casino whitelist your account, cover your withdrawal fees and pay you a good amount of money e.g. $100+, it's still encourage us to gamble because our accounts have been funded, we don't need to make any transaction which spend like 10-20 minutes.

People have to able to control themselves to not gamble too much.

[OgNasty]

Yes. I would say that a vast majority of the funds I’ve gambled with have been due to campaign payments. I don’t see anything wrong with that though. It is smart of them to do it that way and as a member of their campaign I appreciate being able to check out the product that I am advertising.

[Promocodeudo]

Just like in the content of OP, I am a stake participant and I do receive my pay in my stake account but never have i used it to gamble. The thing is, I am more of a sports bettor and I'm comfortable betting in local sportsbook using fiat.

At the same time, gambling with your signature pay might force you to go against your bankroll management. Which is one mistake I wouldn't want to do.

I think this is based on individuals, some perons can actually be moved to gamble when the received their pay from signature campaigns that pays directly in the account if their participants in their site, I remaber when I was a participant of Jacks club is signature campaign, we were been paid in the casino site but I have never used any of the funds paid to me to gamble, through out my participation in that campaign, so I will only say this depends on the participants and how he or she does their own thing, one thing i know for sure is that, once any gambler starts gambling with amount paid to them directly in their casino account, the participant may not be able to withdraw a dime even when he or she wins, infact such gambler might decide to leave he's paying in that site so that he will using it play there.

[terrific]

Mine isn't directed to casino account. But if I would have received it, it's for sure that I'll try to gamble for some.
And if I'm going to gamble with some of it, it's just the start of it. Maybe I'll be gamble for more if I lose my control.
That's why we see stories of other forum members that they become addicted and spends the sig money that they receive direct to their accounts because it's easy to gamble once it's there.

[iv4n]

...

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

As you wrote, "Because why not?". It makes things easier and can save us from some transaction fees... of course, us who would gamble anyway.

I think that if the signature payment goes directly to the casino, it makes people want to gamble... even if they didn't plan to. It's like the balance is there, why not take the opportunity to make a few bets/spins/rolls... I was in that situation many times, and many times I made a few or more dollars profit, even more times I got carried away and lost everything. So be careful, it's all gambling... tricky business.

[Peanutswar]

Ive been there before ive joined into a signature which requires to have your casino account and it will directly created to your wallet and reason why i played some little bit of my earnings to the casino and if it its win good because youve gained extra but if not feels bad at the same time because imagine you can just cashout immediately but again this depends to the player if you are active in playing gambling still good because no hassle to make transfer but if you are trader the same time for sure you will feel the market price movement specially if you are into BTC.

[TravelMug]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Yes, you will be tempted to play with the casino that you promoted since it is already there. Might be good if you have a poll though, to readily see the pulse of those old and current participants whose campaign payment goes directly into our account. Myself as well before, when I have this campaign, maybe the next question is can we blame them for putting it into the casino account? No, still up to the gambler to what to do to their payment. Maybe there are still who goes and control themselves to withdraw right away, as they might not be a real gamble (yes, I do think that there are participants that don't gamble at all but joined gambling signature campaign, no offense to them, but you can see from the post that it's like they are force to post and discuss some topics in the gambling/gambling threads as it is part of the campaign rule). But that is a topic for another discussion.

[Cityhunter34]

This is quite a personal decision because whether is paid directly to your casino or not a gambler that wants to gamble would definitely going to gamble. Although, the truth is that as an addicted gamblers paying directly into your casino might likely trigger you to gamble beyond control. Because most of us normally have this feeling of doubling our money overnight.

However, I would budly say that this can never trigger me to gamble above my limit because I have work in such campaign before and withdraw my money without being tempted.

[mindrust]

Sometimes it does. If the casino has a good reputation and offers variety of games, I’ll try the casino at least because the funds are already there. I don’t need to make a deposit separately. But like I said that happens under certain circumstances. I don’t go randomly play at a casino just because they are paying me via sig camp, especially if the casino is new, that means i have to be extra careful. It is also important that when i decide to withdraw my coins from the casino, the casino should pay for the transaction fees because otherwise it wouldn’t make much sense to get payments directly to the casino account. Some managers don’t make this an emergency but i think they should.

[libert19]

Well there was a signature campaign I participated and it was only for a week, when I joined the payment was sent directly to their gambling site and there are requirements which one must meet to enable them make withdrawal, this condition aren't stated on their signature thread but after payment and I wanted to withdraw I noticed that I must reached a certain threshold for me to be able to have my funds withdrawn.

And of course, it's like a compulsive gambling where the said user has to gamble to meet their requirements to be able to make withdrawal so I had to gamble with such amount sent to gamble site, I was actually lucky enough to had winning and meet up their requirements to be able to withdraw my funds. Most times signature campaign payment sent to their gambling site are indirectly want to gamble and want to take back their payment back to them because they knew that gamblers must lose while gambling.

I can withdraw current sign payments freely (no withdrawal fee either), but earlier I had won this BTC price prediction contest from same casino — I received amount, tried instant withdraw (knowing gambling it would likely cause me to lose it), wasn't able to as amount was below the minimum threshold, so I made some bets and thankfully I was also lucky enough to win those and was able to withdraw.

...maybe the next question is can we blame them for putting it into the casino account? No, still up to the gambler to what to do to their payment.

I would not blame them, and if I was at casino's place, I would want payments sent directly to casino too as it makes user open casino and might make few bets as well. Just don't put restrictions as in wager and shit, and it's all good.

[Bitcoin Smith]

I am seeing some people claim that the purpose of signature payment to casino account is to make them gamble that money but NO, the purpose is to skip the middlemen/escrow to handle the payout and they prefer them sending it directly and if the chose casino account they will simply transfer it with no extra fees and as byproduct some may chose to gamble it away.

It makes sense though because lot of users who never registered into the casino they are promoting so if they are not aware of the service they are promoting and what it offers to the people it doesn't feel right.

[bitbollo]

I have never seen a signature campaign that was FORCING user to play the reward. Maybe in some old bounties there was a "wagering requirements" of 1 time at any odd but never seen this for signature.
In soe cases it was just helpful to have funds already there (likewise if you want gamble you have already a deposit there) but this is nothing more for continue to gamble with signature payments

[Dave1]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Perhaps they will gamble that money, maybe some of us treat signature campaign as a hustle or side line. So once we got the payment, there could some urge to bet whether casino games and sports bettor. If you win, then good you might withdraw it right away. But if you lose, then don't take it hard, there could be another one coming next year.

I haven't been in a campaign that I received the payment in the casino itself. But I must say that I could be one of those gamblers that will used it to play and just hope that I can win and double what I got from the current week.

From what the comments that I read, it could still be 50/50.

[Pi-network314159]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

i think this can only happen to those that receives their signature payment directly to their casino app. but for  those that receives payment to their btc wallet, it is easier for them to HODL their btc while it increase with the passage of time. they can not be tempted to gamble with their fund since it is in their wallet unlike the other campaign that pay directly to their casino app. in conclusion, receiving payment directly to your casino app makes a person gamble.

[₿itcoin]

right.. receiving weekly payment straight to your casino account is essentially turning on your risk appetite.  you know bonus money mechanisms are used by casinos to trick you into spending more time & money however you might not even realise it because it seems like free money.  Risk tolerance rises because the brain interprets it as house money.  Bonus offers distort real costs & can lure you into chasing losses.  so just because it is a surprise deposit does not mean it is safe. recently i've seen some review campaign pay you directly to your casino account and they want you place bet 100% of your funds to withdraw your rewards.. So it's just a trick to keep you gambling.