Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 04:21:33 AM



Title: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 04:21:33 AM
Anyone remember this crazy thing? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50362.0

I mentioned I was going to post another legitimate business idea that also costs about $350,000 to start, but have been putting it off for months. Well, finally, here it is. It isn't Bitcoin related, though if I do start it, manufacturing will cost millions and will be done globally, and I'll obviously push Bitcoin for payments at every opportunity. In the mean time, I am NOT LOOKING FOR DONATIONS, but I AM looking for criticism. If you any of you guys know any SA goons, call them over as well. I need this thing ripped apart, mercilessly, as much as possible before I take it to a venture capitalist meeting. ATLAS and the rest, feel free to take note on how a business plan gets developed.
(I also have a second business idea that uses this same tech that I'll want some feedback on, but I'll let this one get some feedback first)

Quote
Elevator Pitch

The internet is a great network for delivering digital goods, but we don’t quite have such a system for physical goods. We do have major distribution centers that physical goods reroute through, like data through a hub, but the roads, the “wires” that deliver those goods, are horribly inefficient. My idea is for Maglev-based, on-demand, super-fast, fully automated transport lines between major distribution centers of major retailers. The initial market will be a large retailer, like Wal-Mart, but once the lines are expanded throughout a larger region, using Wal-Mart’s automated centers the system could supplement or replace any goods delivery system for any outside client, even personal package delivery, by having packages bounce from hub to hub. This system will be much faster than any other delivery system (Maglev trains travel at over 350mph), is fully automated, not subject to driver fatigue or delays, is very cheap to power and maintain, and can be much smaller and cheaper to build than roads and current train lines.

Specifics

My idea involves my new patented Maglev technology, which allows trains to move on special tracks very quickly without contact and very few moving parts. I got my idea after learning more in depth about Wal-Mart’s fully automated distribution centers, which, with my IT background, reminded me of a digital network, with the centers working like network hubs. My idea is to supplement those hubs with “wires” for physical goods, using the Maglev platform. It would work like a conveyor system between distribution centers that can quickly transport merchandise across the country, relaying it from center to center. The distribution centers are already fully automated and can move packages within the center from one train to another. The Maglev system itself is fully automated and very efficient. Due to that, this idea can be a paradigm shift from the idea that we need bigger and bigger trucks, trains, and ships to transport cargo efficiently. Instead, using this system it would be possible to use small, individual train cars that carry boxes ranging from a refrigerator to a car, and are sent out onto the automated track only when needed, with only the amount that is needed. The initial development could be in central USA, where two distribution centers are separated by a large amount of desert or other cheap land.

Maglev Technology

The MAGLEV system to be used is one invented by my grandfather Dr. Tozoni (Patent No. 8047138). It uses permanent magnets on the train cars, and steel and aluminum rails. The system is entirely mechanically self-stabilizing, requiring no electronic or computer components. Due to the mechanical simplicity of this system, all of this system’s parameters can be calculated mathematically, and thus it can be customized to any requirements using computer software before construction even begins. I have been able to use a computer program to calculate costs for this design. A single train car able to lift 10 tons will cost approximately $89,000. A single mile of rail will cost approximately $5,000,000. This cost is comparable to a new transport truck (estimated cost of around $80,000), and is cheaper than road construction (one mile of road can cost as much as $15mil). A small scale test model will cost $370,000 to develop. Once constructed, the train cars are fully automated, able to move at speeds of up to 350Mph, and adjust speeds without any outside input. The power required for this train is lower than that of wheeled trains, and this system uses regenerative braking, providing for even more power savings.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 27, 2012, 04:31:45 AM
I love the idea, Rassah.

Since you allowed us to play SA Advocate--EPA!

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: theymos on February 27, 2012, 04:54:04 AM
Very, very ambitious project. I doubt it would succeed, even if a big corporation tried it.

- Is this actually a problem? How much money can a Wall-Mart store save by using your system instead of their current system?
- Getting approval for this from governments will be a nightmare, especially with automated vehicles. Every town you have to go through will object to your rails.
- Why hasn't anyone done this already if it's so good?
- Your scheme is more like traditional rail than road transport. But traditional rail traffic has been declining (AFAIK). If businesses decreasingly value traditional rail's improved economy and speed, your system may not appeal to them.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 05:01:21 AM
Very, very ambitions project. I doubt it would succeed, even if a big corporation tried it.

- Is this actually a problem? How much money can a Wall-Mart store save by using your system instead of their current system?
- Getting approval for this from governments will be a nightmare, especially with automated vehicles. Every town you have to go through will object to your rails.
- Why hasn't anyone done this already if it's so good?
- Your scheme is more like traditional rail than road transport. But traditional rail traffic has been declining (AFAIK). If businesses decreasingly value traditional rail's improved economy and speed, your system may not appeal to them.
Not only that, but the corporation(s) that implement such a thing would be paying to develop the networks themselves, instead of the governments building superhighway systems for them - since such a thing is so specialized, and wouldn't be useable for everyone.

I would like to see more Maglev based rail transport in the US though.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 27, 2012, 05:08:46 AM
Quote
...since such a thing is so specialized, and wouldn't be useable for everyone.

Hence, a perfect governmental subsidized project.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:16:49 AM
Very, very ambitions project. I doubt it would succeed, even if a big corporation tried it.

Agreed. It's one hell of a long shot.


Quote
- Is this actually a problem? How much money can a Wall-Mart store save by using your system instead of their current system?

The construction will cost A LOT, but once it's running, the following issues will be eliminated:
High cost of gas
trucking taxes (heavy trucks ruin highways, and thus have to pay extra taxes)
truck driver salaries and benefits
most maintenance costs (there are two moving parts on this whole system)
issues with traffic congestion and driver fatigue, with this thing being able to send stuff 24/7
waiting to fully load a truck before sending it out so as not to waste space
100 mile trip will take 20 minutes instead of 1 hour 50 minutes.

The costs for running this thing is essentially just the electricity to move frictionless aerodynamic platforms around. So, initial cost will be HUGE ($500mil to $1bil for 100 miles of track), but once the infrastructure is built, it'll be cheaper than anything else available by a longshot.

Quote
- Getting approval for this from governments will be a nightmare, especially with automated vehicles. Every town you have to go through will object to your rails.

My hope is to ask to use the empty space between highways to build the rails, and push this as "green technology" that will help reduce traffic. There will no doubt be resistance, but hopefully more people will support it due to those two aspects. Also, regarding automation, the automaton of the trains is literally physically built into the tracks. To make the train move faster, track components are built a bit further apart, and to make it slow down, they are built closer together. There is nothing to control, and nothing to fail, and if one of the trains stops on the tracks, it will short out the entire system, causing all the trains to stop until they are manually restarted. Also, the rails will be enclosed in cages to keep out people and animals. It will require a lot of explanation and marketing to get people to accept this though.

Quote
- Why hasn't anyone done this already if it's so good?

There are now three types of maglev systems out there, the German electromagnetic one (currently built in Shanghai), Japanese superconducting one, and this one. The other two require sophisticated electronics to keep them stable, thus they weigh A LOT, and cost a lot, too (Shanghai one is about $40mil per mile). The one I want to use is brand new, and was only finished being designed a few years ago. We just got the patent in November. So, in sort, all he previously known maglev systems were prohibitively expensive and complicated.

Quote
- Your scheme is more like traditional rail than road transport. But traditional rail traffic has been declining (AFAIK). If businesses decreasingly value traditional rail's improved economy and speed, your system may not appeal to them.

Agreed. Competing with traditional rail, or eve a modified smaller version of one, will be a challenge. The main differences between my system and traditional rail is much greater speed (350mph vs 60mph), and each train car being self powered as opposed to a single engine pulling as much as it can. My thought is that the huge speed and service-on-demand will be the thing that sets it apart, allowing you to stick a package on a train in one location, and have it bounce around the "hubs" at great speeds, transporting just that one package quickly over great distances. Traditional rail is not able to do this at all due to heavily relying on scheduled transportation and bundling of as much cargo as possible, and trucking is only able to do this slowly and at great cost, by having a separate truck deliver just the one package.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:18:55 AM
Not only that, but the corporation(s) that implement such a thing would be paying to develop the networks themselves, instead of the governments building superhighway systems for them - since such a thing is so specialized, and wouldn't be useable for everyone.

My thought is to have this built separately from Walmart, as just my own business (like private rail), and sell the use of it to Walmart or the distribution hub owner. Since this system will be "green" and help reduce truck wear on highways, I am hoping to have it in part funded by government grants, as well as private investors. Once it's built, I can either continue to own and run it privately, renting it's use to Walmart, UPS, FedEx or anyone else who needs to bounce packages around, or sell it to Walmart. The grand idea of this is that some day you'll be able to stop by your local big-box mart or drop-off center, drop off a UPS package, and have it be delivered from NY to LA in about a half a day, or order something from Amazon and pick it up near your house that same afternoon.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 05:28:41 AM
Also, more specifics on the technology please. My understanding is that permanent magnet based Maglev systems have not been utilized because of the excessive size and weight of the magnets themselves not being economical for use in such an application. How are you solving this?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:49:50 AM
Also, more specifics on the technology please. My understanding is that permanent magnet based Maglev systems have not been utilized because of the excessive size and weight of the magnets themselves not being economical for use in such an application. How are you solving this?

Permanent magnets are actually much smaller and lighter for the same amount of magnetic strength compared to other magnets. Electromagnets require a lot of wire windings around them to create magnetism, and as you increase their power, you generate more heat in the windings, requiring thicker wires. For comparison, a twelve inch diameter electromagnet used in the German maglev electromagnet produces the same amount of attraction as a 3 inch neodymium permanent magnet. Superconducting magnets are even more difficult to compare size-wise, since aside from the windings they also require liquid nitrogen cooling systems (storage tanks, pipes, etc).
The reason permanent magnets have not been used is because, until recently, the only method anyone knew of was the Halbach array. This system works by having the magnets positioned in such a way that they produce repulsive forces in the metallic sheet they glide over. Because repulsive forces from self-generated currents are MUCH weaker than pure attraction of steel to magnet, that system does indeed require huge magnets. Worse, because there is a limit to how fast you can generate those currents in the steel sheet, the halbach maglev is very limited in speed (60mph I think). Going too fast will either result in it overrunning the repulsive currents and falling off, or results is huge vibrations.

This system is a completely new design that hasn't even been thought of by anyone before. In fact, people have been attempting to figure out a way to make a permanent magnet and steel rail system stable for about 40 years, and after constantly failing, abandoned the idea and assumed it was impossible. This system was invented and perfected by my grandfather, who has degrees in both mechanical engineering and electrical engineering, over the course of about 15 years, and uses plain permanent magnets to attract to steel rails, generating opposing currents in the aluminum screens as magnetic insulators. As long as the system is moving above 20mph, it's completely stable as if it's on steel wheels. If you'd like, I can explain the principles of how the system works in detail.

Here's a cutaway view of the rails btw, showing the bottom side corner of the train from the front:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-T8zGHKPvuqM/Trtc2j9O09I/AAAAAAAAFv8/VyZwTggCHvw/s800/AMLEV%2520Exploded%2520View.jpg


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: teflone on February 27, 2012, 05:56:36 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Sorry.. just found the diagram..

Very very very very very very very very expensive..

does this use lenz's law ?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:58:40 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Sorry.. just found the diagram..

Very very very very very very very very expensive..

does this use lenz's law ?

Aluminum is wrapped around the outside and inside of the [ and ] shaped steel rails in the picture above.

It is indeed very very very very expensive, but still cheaper than asphalt believe it or not. The costs I have estimated are based on actual full production estimates I got from a manufacturing company that was ready to build it for us, until our funding got yanked.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: teflone on February 27, 2012, 06:01:18 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Aluminum is wrapped around the outside and inside of the [ and ] shaped steel rails in the picture above.

Lenz's law ?  Are you using it, familiar with it



Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:05:31 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Aluminum is wrapped around the outside and inside of the [ and ] shaped steel rails in the picture above.

Lenz's law ?  Are you using it, familiar with it


Not sure about lenz's law. Lorentz force, yes. As magnets pass by the steel rails, they generate a current in the steel, which creates eddy currents in the aluminum screens. Those opposing currents "squeeze" the magnetic flux in the steel rails into the rails themselves, not allowing them to escape around the steel, and thus supersaturate the steel rails.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 06:06:53 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Aluminum is wrapped around the outside and inside of the [ and ] shaped steel rails in the picture above.

Lenz's law ?  Are you using it, familiar with it


Not sure about lenz's law. Lorentz force, yes. As magnets pass by the steel rails, they generate a current in the steel, which creates eddy currents in the aluminum screens. Those opposing currents "squeeze" the magnetic flux in the steel rails into the rails themselves, not allowing them to escape around the steel, and thus supersaturate the steel rails.
I get it. This is thinking outside the box, and I salute the man that was able to put it into action and down on paper.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:07:51 AM
Sorry, checked the paper, yeah, Lentz's law is used.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: teflone on February 27, 2012, 06:08:50 AM
aluminum will enable a field.

Where are you using Alum ?

Aluminum is wrapped around the outside and inside of the [ and ] shaped steel rails in the picture above.

Lenz's law ?  Are you using it, familiar with it


Not sure about lenz's law. Lorentz force, yes. As magnets pass by the steel rails, they generate a current in the steel, which creates eddy currents in the aluminum screens. Those opposing currents "squeeze" the magnetic flux in the steel rails into the rails themselves, not allowing them to escape around the steel, and thus supersaturate the steel rails.

The poles induced on the aluminum would be a problem and counteract the effect your looking for.

I dont think aluminum is the missing link your looking for


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: CIYAM on February 27, 2012, 06:09:07 AM
Living in China I have taken the (AFAIA) only commercial Maglev commuter train (it goes between the airport and the city in Shanghai).

The cost of that rather short line was so expensive that no other Maglev line has been constructed here (and the other high speed trains run nearly as smoothly and not that much slower).

The cost is not due to the trains but the tracks (the accuracy required for Maglev tracks is much greater than for other high speed trains).


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:12:48 AM
One question, are we helping you do your homework?

No. This is actually something I have been trying to pursue for a while now (Actually, a different business idea I'll post after this one), but which I've taken a hiatus from for the last year or so. I now found a new avenue to pursue it through, and just want feedback on the idea before I go there.

Quote
Further reading: http://www.usmaglevcoalition.com/projects.php

These guys are stuck on the German electromagnetic system as if it's the holy grail or something. We tried dealing with them, but, um, screw those guys :(


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:16:18 AM
As magnets pass by the steel rails, they generate a current in the steel, which creates eddy currents in the aluminum screens. Those opposing currents "squeeze" the magnetic flux in the steel rails into the rails themselves, not allowing them to escape around the steel, and thus supersaturate the steel rails.

The poles induced on the aluminum would be a problem and counteract the effect your looking for.

I dont think aluminum is the missing link your looking for

Out of curiosity, what effect did you think we are looking for?
The effect we are looking for in this system is just to supersaturate the steel. Since the steel rails are made of thin stacked sheets a mm or so in thickness, each sheet conducts it's own electric current.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 06:23:19 AM
One question, are we helping you do your homework?

No. This is actually something I have been trying to pursue for a while now (Actually, a different business idea I'll post after this one), but which I've taken a hiatus from for the last year or so. I now found a new avenue to pursue it through, and just want feedback on the idea before I go there.

Quote
Further reading: http://www.usmaglevcoalition.com/projects.php

These guys are stuck on the German electromagnetic system as if it's the holy grail or something. We tried dealing with them, but, um, screw those guys :(

Ok, but industrial regulations the DOT and unions are going to kill you before you ever get off the ground. Have you done any of this research?
Pessimist! Leave him be!


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:23:39 AM
One question, are we helping you do your homework?

No. This is actually something I have been trying to pursue for a while now (Actually, a different business idea I'll post after this one), but which I've taken a hiatus from for the last year or so. I now found a new avenue to pursue it through, and just want feedback on the idea before I go there.

Quote
Further reading: http://www.usmaglevcoalition.com/projects.php

These guys are stuck on the German electromagnetic system as if it's the holy grail or something. We tried dealing with them, but, um, screw those guys :(

Ok, but industrial regulations the DOT and unions are going to kill you before you ever get off the ground. Have you done any of this research?

Only as a spectator, watching Transrapid flail around with their technology for the last ten years. Some people plan to build a MAGLEV line between Baltimore and DC, some other people plan and study the project, then they find out it's too expensive and shut it down. Few years later, rinse and repeat. This is why I am going with individualized cargo. There are WAY more "cargo" riders than "people" riders (almost no one uses public transportation), and with it shipping one pallet at a time, the whole system has a much smaller footprint than a passenger system would.  Think a 12 foot wide box shaped "wall" with one rail stacked on top of the other instead of side by side. Since it's just cargo, I may even be able to just bury the thing underground in some places (covered trench instead of tunnel). Mostly I am hoping that since my system is much cheaper than the other maglev systems, there won't be as many complaints (again, electromagnetic Transrapid is $30m to $40m per mile, mine is $5m), but fighting against trucking unions and regulators will be a bitch no doubt.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:34:13 AM
Living in China I have taken the (AFAIA) only commercial Maglev commuter train (it goes between the airport and the city in Shanghai).

The cost of that rather short line was so expensive that no other Maglev line has been constructed here (and the other high speed trains run nearly as smoothly and not that much slower).

The cost is not due to the trains but the tracks (the accuracy required for Maglev tracks is much greater than for other high speed trains).

The cost issue with the Chinese system (electromagnet based Transrapid) was that they built it on sandy swampy land, which ended up costing WAY more than necessary. The cost of the ticket is high in part because they are trying to recoup their costs, ad in part because their maglev system is very inefficient. Since it uses computers and electronics for balance, each of their trains has to have redundant electronics and batteries. That's crap that the train is required to lift along with the passenger cargo. In fact, most of the train weight is batteries and electronics. Also, the train has a "manually" controlled motor that requires manual changes in frequency of the electricity used to move it. Changing frequency is a VERY expensive process. In short, it costs a lot in electricity to run the inefficient things. In comparison, my system is light (one Transrapid train weighs 150 tons, whereas if they used our tech, it would weigh 25 tons, because batteries and electromagnets are HEAVY!), and my system runs on standard constant frequency 60Hz electric power. No need to change frequencies to change speeds.

Your point about train tracks being extremely precise is valid, but is not really a problem. High speed rail all over Europe is built with tolerances of under 3mm.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:38:44 AM
You are talking about something that will involve a LOT of government interaction. That involvement will put you in the line of fire of inspectors and require you to comply with building code in multiple jurisdictions. You will be required to deal with unions in order to satisfy government factions and DOT regulations, again, across multiple jurisdictions. That’s a killer for really big business and they already have the game in play.

Not disputing any of that, and am quite aware of it. If I start in Nevada, in the middle of nowhere, between two distribution centers separated by nothing but desert and a stretch of highway, I hope to avoid most of those issues, at least by not attracting attention initially.
Also, please keep in mind this is not a project I plan on building myself as a hobby or something. Its not like opening a restaurant (even that requires a whole slew of regulations). This will be presented to venture capitalists for initial funding, the R&D phase will be done in conjunction with a local state university, where I may give up a few rights to the patent and work as a consultant teaching students to work with it, in exchange for getting their support, and I will be hiring a whole slew of people to work on the project, including lawyers and consultants. My job will only be as project manager, where I just oversee it's construction, AFTER I get the initial push off the ground


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 27, 2012, 06:39:27 AM
How practical would it be to incorporate your idea with the bloom box? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcLq3B8C5sk

I'm assuming that this system is operated by electricity from off the grid. If that's the case, then eliminate the grid completely by having bloom box unites either stationed along the line, part of the cargo container, or both.

~Bruno (not Bruno Edison)


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:43:11 AM
How practical would it be to incorporate your idea with the bloom box? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcLq3B8C5sk

I'm assuming that this system is operated by electricity from off the grid. If that's the case, then eliminate the grid completely by having bloom box units either stationed along the line, part of the cargo container, or both.

~Bruno (not Bruno Edison)

It doesn't really matter where the power here comes from. There is also no power on the trains themselves, since they are mostly just chunks of steel and magnets. Using bloomboxes would be possible, but would add more complexity to a project that you can just plug into whatever nearby source of power is the cheapest.


I'm off to bed. Will reply to more questions tomorrow.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: CIYAM on February 27, 2012, 06:43:42 AM
The cost issue with the Chinese system (electromagnet based Transrapid) was that they built it on sandy swampy land, which ended up costing WAY more than necessary.

Yes that is correct, however, it is interesting that the high speed train from Beijing to Tianjin (built years later) which is built on extremely flat and dry land was not done with Maglev (but does run at around 400kmh).

I think that if it was more cost effective then the Chinese would have chosen Maglev instead.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 06:46:12 AM
Yes that is correct, however, it is interesting that the high speed train from Beijing to Tianjin (built years later) which is built on extremely flat and dry land was not done with Maglev (but does run at around 400kmh).

I think that if it was more cost effective then the Chinese would have chosen Maglev instead.

I don't understand, but I think you are thinking that there is only one kind of maglev, or that all maglev costs the same?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: CIYAM on February 27, 2012, 06:51:32 AM
I don't understand, but I think you are thinking that there is only one kind of maglev, or that all maglev costs the same?

I am no expert in the technology or different variations thereof but I do know that China is building high speed railway like no other country on earth so if you can provide a more cost effective means of doing it then you should be doing it there.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: tarrant_01 on February 27, 2012, 10:26:33 AM
You are talking about something that will involve a LOT of government interaction. That involvement will put you in the line of fire of inspectors and require you to comply with building code in multiple jurisdictions. You will be required to deal with unions in order to satisfy government factions and DOT regulations, again, across multiple jurisdictions. That’s a killer for really big business and they already have the game in play.

And then DHS as well...gotta stop the terrorists from bombing our rail systems.  Not sure if you've considered the cost to secure the line.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: organofcorti on February 27, 2012, 12:37:53 PM
Here's a suggestion - pneumatic tubes.

I'm serious. You have a bunch of very large pneumatic tubes. Insert your cargo pod, low pressure in front, higher pressure behind. Use the maglev to reduce friction, braking can add power to the air turbines. If you want you could evacuate the air and add any low friction gas you want.

Someone did something like this but without the maglev a century or so ago. Or maybe I was just reading some steampunk. Anyway, this is very well understood tech and might make things a bit easier at the start.



Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 01:31:20 PM
Here's a suggestion - pneumatic tubes.

I'm serious. You have a bunch of very large pneumatic tubes. Insert your cargo pod, low pressure in front, higher pressure behind. Use the maglev to reduce friction, braking can add power to the air turbines. If you want you could evacuate the air and add any low friction gas you want.

Someone did something like this but without the maglev a century or so ago. Or maybe I was just reading some steampunk. Anyway, this is very well understood tech and might make things a bit easier at the start.


If the maglev is able to do all the work, why bother with the tubes?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: caveden on February 27, 2012, 02:26:19 PM
This sounds really ambitious.

Why are you focused only on cargo transportation? Can't the same technology eventually transport passengers? If you are able to build truck-sized "trains", can't you make the equivalent of buses as well?

I wonder how smaller can you get... it would be awesome if one day our ordinary family cars were able to hop on some rails and run on super-speeds. :D (btw, google tells me 350mph ~ 563kph... that's fucking fast! I don't think there's any commercial train in the world running at such speed, is there?)


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 02:35:52 PM
This sounds really ambitious.

Why are you focused only on cargo transportation? Can't the same technology eventually transport passengers? If you are able to build truck-sized "trains", can't you make the equivalent of buses as well?

I wonder how smaller can you get... it would be awesome if one day our ordinary family cars were able to hop on some rails and run on super-speeds. :D (btw, google tells me 350mph ~ 563kph... that's fucking fast! I don't think there's any commercial train in the world running at such speed, is there?)

Cargo tends to be less sensitive to acceleration and deceleration than humans, and there would be less safety engineering needed.

Also, the air resistance increases by the square of the speed, not linearly. So hurtling through the air at 350 mph is a hell of a lot more ambitious than going at say 250 mph. Just ask the engineers that designed the Bugatti.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: CIYAM on February 27, 2012, 03:16:15 PM
(btw, google tells me 350mph ~ 563kph... that's fucking fast! I don't think there's any commercial train in the world running at such speed, is there?)

The Shanghai maglev will reach a top speed of 431 km/h during peak hour trips (only 301 km/h off peak).


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 04:38:26 PM
The best place to present a project of this magnitude for scrutiny would be a think tank at a major university.  

Trolls and naysayers on forums are free  ;D

I am no expert in the technology or different variations thereof but I do know that China is building high speed railway like no other country on earth so if you can provide a more cost effective means of doing it then you should be doing it there.

I have actually seriously considered China, and despite their total disregard for patents and copyright, I do know how to work with them, and, personally, would be willing to partner up. The two problems I have are 1 - I have no idea how to approach them (especially since they are already sold on Transrapid), and 2 - my grandfather has struggled against communism all his life and doing this with China would be... uncomfortable. Being royalty, his parents were executed, and he was on the run as an enemy of the state throughout his entire youth. He was only left alone, somewhat, after he got his engineering degrees and proved to the government that he is worth a lot more alive than dead. They still spied on him and made his life difficult though (the phones in his house always made a *click-whirr* sound when you tried to call someone).

And then DHS as well...gotta stop the terrorists from bombing our rail systems.  Not sure if you've considered the cost to secure the line.

I haven't, beyond just putting up walls to prevent foreign objects from getting in. Since the system will be closed in the middle, and only open at the distribution center ends, I haven't considered security to be a problem. But I guess someone could load a bomb into a box with a GPS, ship it, and have it detonate in the middle of the rails. A 350mph bomb would do a hell of a lot of damage :( Thanks for the tip.

Here's a suggestion - pneumatic tubes.

Less efficient. Maglev uses an electric motor, with a gap of less than 1cm between windings and magnet. Almost no power is lost. With tubes, you have to power fans, spin them up and down, and pipe the air around corners and such. Tubes also make it more difficult to automate the thing. With the speed and power being built into the track, you can send a train one after another at a 10 second interval, and though the trains will speed up and slow down, they will always be at the same 10 second interval (the system works by sending electric waves down the rails, and the trains ride the waves). With pneumatics, you either have to send one train at a time, or hope that the train in front is sufficiently being pushed by the train behind.

Why are you focused only on cargo transportation? Can't the same technology eventually transport passengers? If you are able to build truck-sized "trains", can't you make the equivalent of buses as well?

Yes. The original patent actually uses passenger trains as example, and in fact, my other business idea involves moving 12meter 30+ ton containers. The problem is pretty much no one in US rides public transport and passenger trains here are not profitable, and in Europe everyone is fixated on the German Transrapid technology, and at the same time wary of ALL Maglev tech because Transrapid was such a colossal waste of money (it works, but only after billions were sunk into it over the last 40 years). Last night I was thinking that, eventually, these will be inevitable for passengers. We won't have oil (jet fuel) for ever, and once that starts to run out, a trip from DC to NY, instead of taking 1 hour by plane, will have to take 4.5 to 5 hours by solar or battery powered dirigible or prop plane. Ground based electric will be the only high speed option.

I wonder how smaller can you get... it would be awesome if one day our ordinary family cars were able to hop on some rails and run on super-speeds. :D (btw, google tells me 350mph ~ 563kph... that's fucking fast! I don't think there's any commercial train in the world running at such speed, is there?)

If I wasn't clear in my business proposal in the OP, I am not proposing truck-sized trains, but only something that would carry two refrigerators or a small sedan, being launched as soon as the box is dropped on it, as opposed to waiting to get filled like trucks are. That's about the smallest this tech allows, though, since it depends on the speed of conductivity of aluminum. Any smaller would require more conductive materials (gold for example) and would make it prohibitively expensive.
Commercial wheel-on-rail trains can't go that fast because centripetal forces will shred the wheels, and there are friction and vibration issues. The main barrier, though, is transferring power to the trains. Overhead lines can't support high speeds. It may be possible to build wheel-on-steel trains using out linear motor technology, though, assuming the wheels can take the abuse.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: cbeast on February 27, 2012, 05:04:01 PM
Your basic idea isn't new. Francis Bellamy wrote about it in 1887 sans the maglev. Germany has been working on this awhile too. http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html (http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html)
The Venus Project's Jacque Fresco has designs for high speed maglev through vacuum tubes for speeds approaching 6000 mph. The Zeitgeist Movement also has many such designs.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:20:46 PM
Your basic idea isn't new. Francis Bellamy wrote about it in 1887 sans the maglev. Germany has been working on this awhile too. http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html (http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html)
The Venus Project's Jacque Fresco has designs for high speed maglev through vacuum tubes for speeds approaching 6000 mph. The Zeitgeist Movement also has many such designs.

I would love to hear Jacque Fresco's design for suspending a train in the air using nothing but magnetism. What type of maglev system did he design, and how does it work?

Thanks for the link btw. Definitely useful. It's good to know that others are looking for something like this, and that I can mention to VC's that the technology they will be investing in may later be sold to those other guys.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: cbeast on February 27, 2012, 05:30:43 PM
Your basic idea isn't new. Francis Bellamy wrote about it in 1887 sans the maglev. Germany has been working on this awhile too. http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html (http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html)
The Venus Project's Jacque Fresco has designs for high speed maglev through vacuum tubes for speeds approaching 6000 mph. The Zeitgeist Movement also has many such designs.

I would love to hear Jacque Fresco's design for suspending a train in the air using nothing but magnetism. What type of maglev system did he design, and how does it work?
As a former Interstate truck driver, I am 100% for an underground freight transport system. I am not familiar with the engineered systems out there. Jacque Fresco is a 94 y/o industrial designer, not an engineer. I don't think he has specific schematics. Naval rail guns achieve artillery velocities, so it must be possible.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 27, 2012, 05:43:12 PM
Your basic idea isn't new. Francis Bellamy wrote about it in 1887 sans the maglev. Germany has been working on this awhile too. http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html (http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/a-world-without.html)
The Venus Project's Jacque Fresco has designs for high speed maglev through vacuum tubes for speeds approaching 6000 mph. The Zeitgeist Movement also has many such designs.

I would love to hear Jacque Fresco's design for suspending a train in the air using nothing but magnetism. What type of maglev system did he design, and how does it work?
As a former Interstate truck driver, I am 100% for an underground freight transport system. I am not familiar with the engineered systems out there. Jacque Fresco is a 94 y/o industrial designer, not an engineer. I don't think he has specific schematics. Naval rail guns achieve artillery velocities, so it must be possible.

Ah, um, yeah, I was kind of expecting that. Coming up with an idea for sending a train through a tube, and using a fancy word like "maglev," isn't coming up with a "maglev design." There are a lot of these "designs" out there, but none have been build since 1887, because the maglev part is actually the most important and most difficult part of it. It's only recently that Transrapid, JR-Maglev, and our system were invented, and all three are still being developed. My system, which I actually own, is the only one that allows for such cheap automated transport, and is what I hope will allow my project to actually become a reality.
As for naval railguns, they use maglev style propulsion, but not suspension. The propulsion is basically your average every-day motor, but unwrapped into a flat strip instead of being a circle, so the magnets move forward instead of swinging around an axis. That, again, is the easy part. Making something hover on magnets has always been the difficult part.

Still, really awesome to hear others are actually working on developing something like that. I would prefer to have this be above ground to save on tunneling though, which is another reason I am pushing for "small."


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on February 27, 2012, 05:45:01 PM
I would prefer to have this be above ground to save on tunneling though, which is another reason I am pushing for "small."
"Small" also cuts down on the surface area exposed to oncoming air mass, resulting in greater speed potentials.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 28, 2012, 01:37:33 AM
How practical would it be to incorporate your idea with the bloom box? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcLq3B8C5sk

I'm assuming that this system is operated by electricity from off the grid. If that's the case, then eliminate the grid completely by having bloom box units either stationed along the line, part of the cargo container, or both.

~Bruno (not Bruno Edison)

It doesn't really matter where the power here comes from. There is also no power on the trains themselves, since they are mostly just chunks of steel and magnets. Using bloomboxes would be possible, but would add more complexity to a project that you can just plug into whatever nearby source of power is the cheapest.

I'm off to bed. Will reply to more questions tomorrow.

Hence the suggestion--cost. It is the cheapest option and shouldn't add that mush complexity to the project. In fact, I can envision the developer(s) of the bloom box working hand-in-hand with your project.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 28, 2012, 01:47:32 AM
I would prefer to have this be above ground to save on tunneling though, which is another reason I am pushing for "small."
"Small" also cuts down on the surface area exposed to oncoming air mass, resulting in greater speed potentials.

With an aerodynamic shape.

What was the maximum gross weight being transported, again?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 28, 2012, 05:14:16 AM
I would prefer to have this be above ground to save on tunneling though, which is another reason I am pushing for "small."
"Small" also cuts down on the surface area exposed to oncoming air mass, resulting in greater speed potentials.

With an aerodynamic shape.

What was the maximum gross weight being transported, again?


Five to ten tons. I can make the weight be whatever I want it to be, but one of these will transport one pallet, or about two refrigerator sized boxes.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: CIYAM on February 28, 2012, 05:23:22 AM
Not sure how much you know about the automated freight trains being used in the coal mining industry in Australia but certainly companies like BHP have a lot of money to spend and the resource boom is still going very strongly down under (so maybe some opportunities there).


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: cbeast on February 28, 2012, 05:27:42 AM
If trucks were taken off the Interstate system, there is at least a full lane that could be devoted to a two-way autonomous freight system. Container size does not need to much bigger than a coffin for most crap people buy. Trucks and trains can still be used for the few large items.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Wandering Albatross on February 28, 2012, 05:53:13 AM
The politics of making that a reality would bog it down into a painful misery.

Besides 3d printing may do away with shipping a lot of stuff. Imagine local 3D printing shops that have the raw materials and you design what you want from home, they print it and you pick it up and pay for it.

We are on the verge of some new and very disruptive technologies impacting the masses.  Nanotech being one. The significance is not realized by most but it hasn't gone unnoticed by defense industry and others.

But maybe your maglev could be used for moving raw materials.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 28, 2012, 02:35:14 PM
The politics of making that a reality would bog it down into a painful misery.

Besides 3d printing may do away with shipping a lot of stuff. Imagine local 3D printing shops that have the raw materials and you design what you want from home, they print it and you pick it up and pay for it.

We are on the verge of some new and very disruptive technologies impacting the masses.  Nanotech being one. The significance is not realized by most but it hasn't gone unnoticed by defense industry and others.

But maybe your maglev could be used for moving raw materials.

That's a good point. And with things like Skype becoming more mainstream, travel will be required less, too. Luckily, 3D printers are a very long way away from printing electronics, televisions, blenders, and refrigerators. It'll happen eventually though.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Exonumia on February 28, 2012, 03:33:12 PM

It sounds like you need yourself a Lyle Lanley

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ

Good luck to you... I have been wondering why we don't have automated delivery systems since I was a child... just takes someone crazy enough to believe to change things.



Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Wandering Albatross on February 28, 2012, 07:45:46 PM
Quote from: Rassah
Luckily, 3D printers are a very long way away from printing electronics, televisions, blenders, and refrigerators. It'll happen eventually though.

I urge you to look into 3D printing a little further. It's not that new. My point is that we are not a long way away at all. There's another name that it is called but I can't remember the term. I think it's additive engineering (as opposed to removal engineering).
They are doing human organs, engine parts and I've seen intricate items like a timepiece.

Don't forget any disruptive technology is going to get held back by tptb, but things move forward.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on February 28, 2012, 08:00:27 PM
I urge you to look into 3D printing a little further. It's not that new. My point is that we are not a long way away at all. There's another name that it is called but I can't remember the term. I think it's additive engineering (as opposed to removal engineering).
They are doing human organs, engine parts and I've seen intricate items like a timepiece.

I'm quite aware of 3D printing, and have followed it since it started with modified ink jet printers years ago. How long do you think it will be until we can print something like an iPad at home from scratch?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Wandering Albatross on March 01, 2012, 08:16:49 PM
Quote from: Rassah
I'm quite aware of 3D printing, and have followed it since it started with modified ink jet printers years ago. How long do you think it will be until we can print something like an iPad at home from scratch?

Before modified ink-jets they used a laser, to initiate polymerization in a bath of polymer, at the surface.
With the $$ that apple makes in ipads wouldn't expect that to happen soon.  But I have no idea.

With MEMS and other tech. like that it's conceivable that it goes past the printing paradigm and goes to a programmed additive engineering. Probably already a clever name for it. Similar to how a gene codes for an elbow tendon. Only all done via nano-bots. nanotech seems to have bored most people but it is likely the most disruptive tech. right now. It allows control of synthesis in amazing ways. Going a little astray.

Shipping things all over is very wasteful.  But apparently tptb like shipping.  I always thought that shipping music,movies in cds, dvds etc. was so odd.
Why didn't they just have a cd/dvd burner in a shop and burn a copy on an as-needed model. Now they wanted to retain control of the IP so shipping was their answer I guess. But they could have saved billions by having a cd/dvd burning kiosk that was physically secured.

My long winded point is that the politics of any large project is so complex now that tech. can leap over the initial idea.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on March 01, 2012, 08:25:38 PM
I think stamping and shipping things like plastic forks, spoons, and knives would actually still be cheaper than printing them at home. There is a lot of savings in customized specific production hardware over the universal generic one. Manor will eventually change that, but that won't happen for at least another 20 years.

Update on my project: I was going to meet with a VC group this Friday, but due to my state's budget going through legislation this week I can't take this Friday off, and need to stay in the office "on call." I am going to try to meet with them over Skype, but whoever is handling email at that department is very unresponsive. If that fails, I'll try again next week.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on March 04, 2012, 04:05:08 PM
In case anyone is interested in following the development (or total catastroflunk) of this project, I'll keep posting updates here.

Executive Summary is fleshed out. I wasn't able to meet with VCs this past Friday due to not being able to take off from work, so will try again next Friday. I fully expect costs ("especially in this economy") will be the main barrier to fight against to get this started. Hopefully I can get the university interested enough without giving up too many patent rights. The sad thing is, the actual inventor of this system is in pretty severe stages of Alzheimer and cancer, and will probably not survive the rest of this year, so one of my main goals also involves getting someone else involved in this well enough that they can understand and continue to develop this system. Although the basic construction and design are simple, the math involved is very complex and specialized, and it would be a tragedy if this system disappears from our collective knowledge for decades until someone rebuilds it from (admittedly badly) written instructions.
In the meantime, here's the finished Executive Summary:

Quote
The Pitch.
The internet is a great way to deliver digital goods, bouncing data along wires from hub to hub. Wouldn’t it be great if we had a similar system for physical goods? Turns out we already have the hubs – Wal-Mart’s distribution centers are an automated technological wonder – but the “wires” connecting these centers are slow, inefficient roads manned by cumbersome, expensive trucks. Our ultra-high-speed transport system will connect the already established distribution centers, with direct, fully automated, efficient, and cheap to operate lines.

Product.
Currently, to transport goods to distribution centers, trucks have to drive from one to the other by roads and highways. This method is slow, and susceptible to traffic issues, driver fatigue, and high costs of maintenance, fuel, and taxes. We (Tozoni AMLEV) propose to design and build customized high-speed transport lines between distribution centers. The system will consist of small, fully-automated cargo platforms, only big enough to carry a large refrigerator or a 3,000lb aircraft shipping container. The platforms will be gliding on the track using magnetic levitation technology, flying at 350 miles per hour, completely automatically. Once reaching their destination distribution centers, the cargo will be automatically offloaded and routed through the distribution center’s internal conveyor system to its next destination. Once multiple distribution centers are connected, the cargo will be able to bounce from center to center, being transported over vast distances cheaply, very quickly and completely automatically.

Value Proposition.
Tozoni AMLEV system is cheap to design due to using analytical calculations for all of its components (all aspects can be fully simulated on computers instead of on physical models). The system is also light and cheap to build, due to it being fully automated by design, as opposed to relying on complex control systems. Since the cargo platforms do not touch the track, and very few moving components are involved, there is very little maintenance required for the system. The system is also very energy efficient, using only electricity for propulsion, without friction, of small light platforms. Since the platforms can reach speeds of 350mph and beyond, it makes it possible to quickly ship only products that are needed, instead of waiting for a large truck to load up on everything that may be necessary in the direction it is going. Using smaller cargo platforms also means it is possible to use much lighter and cheaper track construction, including possibility of stacking tracks to reduce the land footprint.

Competitive Advantage.
Tozoni AMLEV system, including both suspension and propulsion components, is fully patented. Dr. Tozoni has many years of experience in mechanical and electrical engineering, was the Head of the Department of Electrodynamics at the Cybernetics Institute of the Academy of Science, USSR, and has published many books on mathematics and electromagnetics. The Tozoni AMLEV levitation system differs from all other levitation systems in that it is based on attractive force of permanent magnets, that all aspects of it can be fully analytically calculated and designed, as opposed to relying on trial and error, and is suspended automatically, without need for monitoring and control systems. The system is also fairly well known, and has a team of scientists and engineers very interested in being involved with or helping with its construction.

The Marketing Plan.
The Immediate goal is to build a single transport line between two distribution centers separated by desert or farm land (to keep the costs of land down). (Example: Wal-Mart distribution Center in Chyenne, Wyoming to one in North Platte, Nebraska, 200 miles down center of highway). Our target segment is any market interested in transporting small to medium physical goods. Initially, the system will target retail distribution centers, allowing the first two connected centers to operate as one. This means cargo trucks will only be required to deliver their goods to the distribution center closest to their point of origin, instead of having to go to both centers. Eventually, once we connect more distribution centers, the interconnected automated network should be able to support delivery of all of the retail goods among the centers, and the center operator should be able to take on outside business, such as mail and parcel delivery, or any delivery of physical goods.

We believe that despite the high initial cost of construction, the finished product, with its very high speed and extremely low operating cost, will be able to easily compete with existing delivery methods, and make up the cost of construction through high profit margins.

The Financial Plan.
Tozoni AMLEV will need approximately $400,000 to build the initial proof-of-concept test model within 6 months of initial funding. The system design and parameters have already been analytically calculated, and the initial funding will go to consulting services for Dr. Friedman of Drexel University (he is a student, of a student, of Dr. Tozoni), and for engineering and manufacturing of the test model by Oceaneering Inc., a local MD engineering firm familiar with the project. Once the physical test model verifies the analytical calculation results, a further $500,000 will be required to design and engineer the platforms themselves. During that period, we will scout locations of potential distribution centers 100+ miles apart, secure required land, and negotiate deals with the distribution center operators. In the first half of 2013 we will build a 2 mile test track, preferably on the location where the final track will be used. The system costs approximately $4MM per mile of track, and approximately $90,000 per platform, although we think we may be able to reduce costs by using cheaper support materials (estimates are based on a 30ton cargo container system requiring heavy concrete support). During that time, funding will also be needed for final design tests, which should be completed by the end of 2013 or earlier. Construction of the finished line should be completed by mid-to-end of 2015. At initial launch of the system, the system is expected to be used at near capacity, working as both a bridge between two distribution centers, and a bridge between two parts of the country (trucks can save money by dropping goods off at one center, and have them be picked up by another truck at the next center, even if the final destination for the goods isn’t one of the two centers). After proof of concept and a strong positive revenue stream, a portion of the revenues will be used to secure and develop lines between other distribution centers.

Dingman resources will be used, along with Maryland Technology Commercialization funding, to set up a lab at the University of Maryland, where students will participate in further developing the system, including building the initial test model. Part of the funding for the main project will be raised from the government’s technology research and green initiative programs, and the rest through private funding. We also expect to get local government tax subsidies for providing a system that will ease traffic on their roads.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: cbeast on March 04, 2012, 06:26:18 PM
Personally, I think that divided highways should not be split by direction, but by the type of traffic it carries. Professionally driven truck trains on one side and the drunks driving SUVs on the other. just sayin.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: bb113 on March 04, 2012, 06:40:11 PM
At the very least there should be a "drunk lane", lined with tires so it's like bumper bowling. Student drivers could use it as well.

Quote
Drunk driving creates a total loss of $9 billion per year or 16 cents per mile driven in the U.S.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=7888

Quote
A mile of freeway through an urban area costs approximately $39 million, while a mile of freeway through a rural area costs approximately $8 million.
http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-14011-28076--F,00.html

Not financially viable though.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on March 04, 2012, 09:58:06 PM
Quote
A mile of freeway through an urban area costs approximately $39 million, while a mile of freeway through a rural area costs approximately $8 million.
http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-14011-28076--F,00.html

Ooh, thanks for this! Definitely useful info for me!


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on March 21, 2012, 08:56:43 PM
Just an update on what's going on.
I met with my University's "Entrepreneurship Center" on March 9th (http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/dingman/). Got some good feedback there. They also asked why not people, since cargo doesn't need to be fast. Good point about cargo usually not requiring fast transport, but sadly people here just don't really use trains. Other suggestion is to focus on perishables (apparently McDonalds has distribution networks, too, for example), or on Just-In-Time manufacturing places.
The three areas of development to possibly focus on are as a:

Feature - sell it as a distribution component for an already established distribution system around a campus, such as the Detroit car parts and assembly campus
Product - sell it directly to Wal-Mart as a replacement for their current trucking system
Platform - develop it as an independently owned transportation network, and let whoever needs to transport things use it. Other businesses can develop then their business around this platform.

Next steps are to assemble a team, and pitch to things like Wal-Mart Business Challenge, MIPS, and one I am currently pursuing, ACC Clean Energy Challenge (http://www.accnrg.org)
I'm in the process of looking for team members (found at least one) and using a very nice resource called CoFoundersLab (http://goo.gl/dLKab) to look for people. Submission deadline for ACC is the 23rd, so I'm kinda scrambling.
A website (very basic) for the tech is set up at http://www.amlevtrans.com/, and final draft of Executive Summary is here http://sg.sg/GDIDKT. I really need to update that site though (never have the time), and probably upload the "manual" for the tech, which we had to keep off the site until our patent was approved.

I also need to come up with a different name. My grandparents called it Amlev (American Type of Maglev), but this system really shouldn't be limited to America, and despite by grandparents' patriotism, I really think the name should reflect the inventor, Tozoni, rather than the country he liked. So, I'm thinking Tozoni MAGLEV, or something simple/similar would be good.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on March 21, 2012, 09:01:57 PM
Very nice site, hope you are able to get somewhere with this as it appears to be an excellent design/idea.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on July 11, 2012, 03:03:19 PM
Bump because I see Rassah is online and I would be interested in an update.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on July 11, 2012, 03:37:49 PM
Bump because I see Rassah is online and I would be interested in an update.

I didn't get anything out of that Clean Energy Challenge thing, but was pointed to a few programs within University of Maryland that I should interview with and apply for. I met with the representatives of those programs around mid May. They suggested I apply for one of their tech development grants in the fall, but to do that I need to incorporate, since grants are not given out to individual people directly. Working on incorporating now (by which I mean I have been sitting on my butt for the last few weeks, enjoying the free time since I graduated, and just now thinking "Oh crap! Summer's half way over!"). Since it's summer vacation, the university hasn't been any help with that process, so having to figure that out on my own.
Also, Dr. Tozoni, the inventor (and my grandfather), passed away on June 1st, so that kinda sucked :(
On the plus side, one of his students, who since coming to this country has refused to help and maybe saw Dr. Oleg as competition, attended the funeral and the commemorative dinner last night, and we actually became acquaintances. My parents seem to have gotten very friendly with him and his wife, too, in part because he used to be Tozoni's long time friend, and spent many years with him back in USSR (my mother has interest in someone who knew her father so well). The huge benefit of that is that he was Dr. Tozoni's student, understands all the tech behind the invention, recognizes just how big Dr. Tozoni was, AND he's a high ranking professor at University of Maryland, with a lot of recognition and awards. Before, I avoided mentioning him completely during my discussions with university out of fear that he would sabotage my progress. Now, maybe I will be able to use him as a reference, and a word from him would be a HUGE benefit. I guess I'll find out soon enough.

So, in summary, need to incorporate, then apply for funding, and in the mean time maybe polish the website a bit.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on August 14, 2012, 03:54:14 AM
(bump?  :-[)

Registered TozoniMAGLEV, L.L.C., so tax time should be way more interesting this year. Building a web page at http://www.tozonimaglev.com (still missing a lot). Got a business partner who is very eager to work with me. Deadline for submitting applications for funding is October 15th, so will have an Executive Summary and business plan before then. In the mean time, continuing to build out the site, and am setting up accounting stuff for the new Corp (giving GnuCash a try). Will hold company assets in Bitcoin, partly because it's easier than opening a business account at a bank, and partly because Bitcoin. Nice to have a partner to work with for a change.

Signing off.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on August 14, 2012, 04:01:02 AM
Awesome, I love the concept and I'm always interested in how it proceeds.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: check_status on August 14, 2012, 07:45:47 AM
:shakesfist: Phinnaeus, you used my idea which I got from somewhere else. :D
It is amazing tech, so can't really blame you.

In the Bloom Box videos, the CBS version, there is a BTVC who got the $400Million for Bloom Box, 4x the initial projection. You could argue it was over funded.

Is there a loss over distance, electrically?
Are the rails levitation susceptible to interference induced currents generated by something like solar magnetic storms, static electrical fields, an EMP, or microwave radiation?
Is it possible to discharge a rail intentionally or unintentionally?

Another point, the entire line would be limited in acceleration time, 0-350mph, by the most acceleration sensitive items. A tomatoe may only handle an accelration of 0-350mph in 15 seconds while a refrigerator could withstand accelration from 0-350mph in 7 seconds. Therefore, the entire lines shipping time doubles by adding tomatoes to the shipping line.

If you had multiple load and unload points in between start of line and end of line, how would you handle shifting cars, or cargo, on and off of tracks?

How would you handle track length, if your not shifting cars off?
The track would have to be 3x the distance of the actual start and end transportation points.
A loop would be more efficient I guess, but would that work with the electrical systerm in the rails?

How about Canada's logging, mining industry? Or even there great expanse of wild from east to west?


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on August 15, 2012, 03:09:03 AM
I guess these questions are regarding my tech?

Is there a loss over distance, electrically?
Are the rails levitation susceptible to interference induced currents generated by something like solar magnetic storms, static electrical fields, an EMP, or microwave radiation?
Is it possible to discharge a rail intentionally or unintentionally?

1) No more than over regular wires. If the lines running parallel to the track are high voltage, feeding the track itself through transformers every few kilometers, it should be ok (no different than electric trains)
2 & 3) There is no current in the rail other than what little is generated at the instant the train passes over it, and the levitation itself is done by magnetism - permanent magnet attracted to steel - not by electricity. I guess maybe a very powerful EMP can disrupt the levitation, and that may be enough for the train to shift and scrape/crash on the rails. I don't know how powerful it would have to be. Nice idea for something to test in the lab :D (and gives us an excuse to build one legally)

Another point, the entire line would be limited in acceleration time, 0-350mph, by the most acceleration sensitive items. A tomatoe may only handle an accelration of 0-350mph in 15 seconds while a refrigerator could withstand accelration from 0-350mph in 7 seconds. Therefore, the entire lines shipping time doubles by adding tomatoes to the shipping line.

I suspect a bigger factor will be keeping the motor from overheating, or the motor wiring from getting bent or ripped out from too much exertion from high acceleration. Also, hopefully, most of the rail line will be travel at constant high speed rather than fast starts and stops. Honestly, though, I haven't considered high G acceleration for anything other than a gas gun for space launches (uses exploding gas behind the train rather than electric motor)

If you had multiple load and unload points in between start of line and end of line, how would you handle shifting cars, or cargo, on and off of tracks?

Platforms will be difficult to remove due to their attraction to the rails. I was thinking the platforms would just be flat cars, and cargo will be removable boxes that lock on top of them. Cars can also be shifted between tracks, though at low speed.

How would you handle track length, if your not shifting cars off?
The track would have to be 3x the distance of the actual start and end transportation points.
A loop would be more efficient I guess, but would that work with the electrical systerm in the rails?

A loop, or a low speed shift  where a train comes in front-forward, then shifts and leaves back-forward can work (trains are symmetrical, so can travel forward and backward). Trans that simply slow down while overhead traveling cranes that take off or deposit cargo can work too.

How about Canada's logging, mining industry? Or even there great expanse of wild from east to west?

Good idea about Canada. I'm looking for a place with a lot of really cheap unused land, since that is the most expensive part of building this. Though logs and mined ore aren't perishable, so moving that slowly and cheaply is still best. Perishables like food, or people, moved across the country would work better. Thanks for the Canada idea.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on August 19, 2012, 10:15:58 PM
Set up a business account at 1TZMG7L8iN7SgtTC2ZVguxzdxkLKCwuqy  (TZMG = TozoniMaglev). Contributed capital: 61.807520BTC. So far spent $150 on a company logo design ($75 now, $75 in accounts payable). Current company profit: -$150USD. Good start!  ;D


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: thatbluedude on August 20, 2012, 12:08:59 AM
Playing the investor without reading other posts: might be redundant
I’m not convinced that this will make me money. Why should I invest my money in fancy trains(on stilts?)for cargo? will the advantage gained be really worth the billions it will cost to set this up? Why will you succeed where many others have failed? Why should I believe your numbers? magnets->rare earths;how will this affect the world market/price ?
after reading other user posts:
“following issues will be eliminated: most maintenance costs.” sceptical about that claim. you will have to pay for everything since it’s private property. after some years you would be in a constant replacement cycle repairing tracks and everything else. whats the expected lifetime of tracks? 30 years?

I would like to read the actual business case when you have it since I like the idea of maglev and it’s difficult to work with just a few sentences.
most important! will I get some free company shares for my awesome input when this takes off?   :)


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on August 20, 2012, 01:18:15 AM
^ ^ ^

I got an idea, Rassah. Name the investment arm of this endeavor LevPirate, stating at the onset that investors are by invite only. That should attract some capital.

~Cackling Bear~


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on August 20, 2012, 07:10:32 AM
Playing the investor without reading other posts: might be redundant
I’m not convinced that this will make me money. Why should I invest my money in fancy trains(on stilts?)for cargo? will the advantage gained be really worth the billions it will cost to set this up? Why will you succeed where many others have failed? Why should I believe your numbers? magnets->rare earths;how will this affect the world market/price ?

Thanks for letting me practice my pitch:
Using this tech you can change shipping from the current accepted practice - having to load as large of containers and trains as possible - to JIT small fast trains that only go when you need to send a package or two. You don't need to wait for everything to be loaded, and don't need to wait for the driver to be ready. As soon as your train with the small cargo rolls over the section with the linear motor embedded in the track, it will get whisked away to its destination automatically. Amazon is pushing heavily for same-day delivery, currently relying on opening up more and more storage centers around the country. Using this system they can have one main hub handling a huge area, with these automated lines extending to much smaller hubs further out. I believe this system, although a bit more expensive to build than wheel on steel, is a heck of a lot more efficient than anything else out there, and operating costs for power will be much smaller as well (on top of the savings from almost no moving parts, no friction wear, and no driver). Should gas prices increase, trucking and diesel trains will become even more expensive, as will airplane flights, and this may end up being the only viable fast transport system. This system can also be used by NASA or the military to launch small satellites into space using electrical assistance (think giant rail gun). I heard that 20% of a rocket's fuel is used up just to get it moving on takeoff. This can accelerate a rocket to tremendous speeds before it has to fire off it's own propellant.
I believe the other MAGLEVs have failed because their technology is woefully inadequate. It's both too complex with all the redundant computer control systems, and way more expensive (and dangerous). The extremely high cost (~$45m/mile) of the Transrapid electromagnetic MAGLEV system was the main reason MAGLEV projects never took off anywhere; governments are excited about planning to build a MAGLEV until they see the price tag, and once they do, the projects/ideas get delayed indefinitely. My system costs about 1/4th that of Transrapid.
I have very detailed spreadsheets that calculate the costs of all the materials, even including volumes of raw materials required based on SolidWorks CAD designs. I can share the spreadsheet and you can check my assumptions. As for rare earth magnets, they are only required on the train cars, not the rails, and a large cargo carrier (30 ton capacity) I think uses about $120k worth of them. Building this system will increase demand, and thus price, but probably not substantially. Plus with newer and more powerful magnets coming out, smaller magnets can be used.

after reading other user posts:
“following issues will be eliminated: most maintenance costs.” sceptical about that claim. you will have to pay for everything since it’s private property. after some years you would be in a constant replacement cycle repairing tracks and everything else. whats the expected lifetime of tracks? 30 years?
Hmm, good point. No idea what the expected lifetime is. There's no friction, but no doubt a bit of flex as the trains pass over. I think the cement will get worn out first though. The rails are actually not that expensive, and can be taken out and replaced, since they are just bolted in in long sections. There will also be a slow moving maintenance vehicle that will go over the rails to test them for any issues every once in a while. Testing for what kind of stresses will be experienced is part of what the initial model will be used for.


I would like to read the actual business case when you have it since I like the idea of maglev and it’s difficult to work with just a few sentences.
most important! will I get some free company shares for my awesome input when this takes off?   :)

I'll have the old business plan up (Gaza Land bridge) some time this week. As for the newer one, I have to write it up and submit it by October 15th. Hopefully I'll have it way before then.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: Rassah on August 21, 2012, 12:29:21 AM
For anyone who is curious, I uploaded the old business plan (for the multi-billion dollar project), and my old Executive Summary that I wrote for my Entrepreneurship class, to the website here: http://www.tozonimaglev.com/files
The files are GAZA-6-BUSINESS PLAN- WITH CHANGES BY DMITRY.docx and Executive Summary (OLD).docx
The first file is a rather long and detailed read. The second I will have to change some and add a business plan to before I can submit it for consideration for grants/loans.


Title: Re: Business idea (Off-Topic, but looking for feedback)
Post by: rjk on August 21, 2012, 04:17:33 PM
This is sweet, I see that you are considering using existing rights-of-way along the highway medians. I think this is the perfect way to do a new high speed rail system, anywhere.