|
Title: What is more Power Efficient Post by: kahir on July 25, 2014, 07:18:44 PM Hello i would like to know what algorithm is more power efficient as the topic say
myr grostel or qubit (x5) and does the increasing of the X make the algorithm more power efficient like if x11 uses 100 W does X13 uses 90 w AND x14 use 80W Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: Amph on July 25, 2014, 07:31:06 PM whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization
Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: kahir on July 25, 2014, 07:38:53 PM go away Amph
Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: Amph on July 25, 2014, 07:48:37 PM go away Amph uh? lol? this is the true man, it is whirlcoin with whirlpool algo, if you don't believe me just do some research Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: djm34 on July 25, 2014, 08:29:45 PM whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization thanks for repeating that everywhere after all the time I spent improving it... ::) and this isn't entirely true (you never said that groestl was crappy before Christian released killer groestl... and currently this is where whirlpool is, it isn't (yet) killer whirlcoin but went through at least 2 or 3 rounds of optimization.) regarding power efficiency. Saying that a gpu use less power over a long chain, means it is less efficient not the inverse. Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: Amph on July 25, 2014, 09:18:24 PM whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization thanks for repeating that everywhere after all the time I spent improving it... ::) and this isn't entirely true (you never said that groestl was crappy before Christian released killer groestl... and currently this is where whirlpool is, it isn't (yet) killer whirlcoin but went through at least 2 or 3 rounds of optimization.) regarding power efficiency. Saying that a gpu use less power over a long chain, means it is less efficient not the inverse. i never said it just because i wasn't a nvidia user back then, not a strong one at least(i didn't care much about nvidia to be honest), but it's true it still lack some optimization actually i said you did a great job with it in the official thread i remember one of my post saying it Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: SpeedDemon13 on July 25, 2014, 10:19:32 PM whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization Doesn't it do 9300 kh/s on the latest sgminer fork by djm, that's up from 3300 kh/s.... Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: kahir on July 25, 2014, 10:39:19 PM guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....
Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: SpeedDemon13 on July 25, 2014, 10:42:59 PM guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet .... Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power. Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: kahir on July 25, 2014, 10:50:13 PM guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet .... Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power. exactly .... example if im mining myr and im getting same X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15 and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: SpeedDemon13 on July 25, 2014, 10:51:41 PM guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet .... Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power. exactly .... example if im mining myr and im getting same X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15 and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric I would say HVY is the most power efficient per hash, but not necessarily the most profitable. Title: Re: What is more Power Efficient Post by: Amph on July 26, 2014, 07:19:34 AM whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization Doesn't it do 9300 kh/s on the latest sgminer fork by djm, that's up from 3300 kh/s.... 9300 one card? i must have missed it guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet .... Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power. exactly .... example if im mining myr and im getting same X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15 and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric myriand don't have whirlcoin, stupid question, you can't compare like that, for now the most power saving is whirlpool |