Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 03:58:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What is more Power Efficient  (Read 1143 times)
kahir (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 07:18:44 PM
 #1

Hello i would like to know what algorithm is more power efficient as the topic say


myr grostel or qubit (x5)


and does the increasing of the X make the algorithm more power efficient

like if

x11 uses 100 W

does

X13 uses 90 w  AND x14 use  80W

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 07:31:06 PM
 #2

whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization
kahir (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 07:38:53 PM
 #3

go away Amph
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 07:48:37 PM
 #4

go away Amph


uh? lol?

this is the true man, it is whirlcoin with whirlpool algo, if you don't believe me just do some research
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 08:29:45 PM
 #5

whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization
thanks for repeating that everywhere after all the time I spent improving it...  Roll Eyes and this isn't entirely true
(you never said that groestl was crappy before Christian released killer groestl... and currently this is where whirlpool is,
it isn't (yet) killer whirlcoin but went through at least 2 or 3 rounds of optimization.)

regarding power efficiency. Saying that a gpu use less power over a long chain, means it is less efficient not the inverse.

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 09:18:24 PM
 #6

whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization
thanks for repeating that everywhere after all the time I spent improving it...  Roll Eyes and this isn't entirely true
(you never said that groestl was crappy before Christian released killer groestl... and currently this is where whirlpool is,
it isn't (yet) killer whirlcoin but went through at least 2 or 3 rounds of optimization.)

regarding power efficiency. Saying that a gpu use less power over a long chain, means it is less efficient not the inverse.

i never said it just because i wasn't a nvidia user back then, not a strong one at least(i didn't care much about nvidia to be honest), but it's true it still lack some optimization

actually i said you did a great job with it in the official thread i remember one of my post saying it
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 10:19:32 PM
 #7

whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization

Doesn't it do 9300 kh/s on the latest sgminer fork by djm, that's up from 3300 kh/s....

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
kahir (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 10:39:19 PM
 #8

guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 10:42:59 PM
 #9

guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....

Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
kahir (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 25, 2014, 10:50:13 PM
 #10

guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....

Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power.

exactly ....


example


if im mining myr

and im getting same  X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric



 same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15  and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 10:51:41 PM
 #11

guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....

Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power.

exactly ....


example


if im mining myr

and im getting same  X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric



 same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15  and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric

I would say HVY is the most power efficient per hash, but not necessarily the most profitable.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
July 26, 2014, 07:19:34 AM
 #12

whirlpool-->whirlcoin because it lack optimization

Doesn't it do 9300 kh/s on the latest sgminer fork by djm, that's up from 3300 kh/s....

9300 one card? i must have missed it

guys guys .... the question why i made the thread is not answered yet ....

Your question is a little vague. Do you mean power efficient in respect of hash power or just low power? I'm just assuming the power efficient per hash power.

exactly ....


example


if im mining myr

and im getting same  X myr coins using both algorithm MYR-grostil and Qubit ...... which one use less electric



 same here lets say im mining a coin that uses x11-13-15  and getting the exact amount of coins for each algorithm .... which one use less electric

myriand don't have whirlcoin, stupid question, you can't compare like that, for now the most power saving is whirlpool
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!