Title: Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? Post by: Muhammed Zakir on October 27, 2014, 04:46:15 PM Just have this question! :)
Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? ~~MZ~~ Title: Re: Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? Post by: etotheipi on October 27, 2014, 04:49:20 PM Just have this question! :) Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? ~~MZ~~ When Armory's wallet format was originally created, compressed keys didn't exist in any Bitcoin software. I never accommodated for the possibility in the wallet format. Since then, the wallet format has been so thoroughly tested and battle-hardened, I didn't want to mess with it to support a non-critical feature like compressed public keys. Finishing up a new wallet format now that will support a lot of new features, including both compressed and uncompressed keys. Still a ways off from an official release, but it's coming. Title: Re: Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? Post by: Dabs on October 31, 2014, 12:22:01 PM This is the only thing that I'm waiting for.
In theory, this is possible right? I mean, a deterministic wallet that uses compressed keys. So I can have a watch-only wallet on my web server. (Like a game website for example.) Title: Re: Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? Post by: inf on October 31, 2014, 12:51:19 PM This is the only thing that I'm waiting for. In theory, this is possible right? I mean, a deterministic wallet that uses compressed keys. So I can have a watch-only wallet on my web server. (Like a game website for example.) It does not matter whether they are compressed or not, otherwise Armory itself would not work... See this thread how to host a today's watch-only wallet on a webserver with PHP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=836465.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=836465.0) Title: Re: Why is compressed private keys not supported? Any problem? Post by: Dabs on November 01, 2014, 01:02:15 AM This is the only thing that I'm waiting for. In theory, this is possible right? I mean, a deterministic wallet that uses compressed keys. So I can have a watch-only wallet on my web server. (Like a game website for example.) It does not matter whether they are compressed or not, otherwise Armory itself would not work... See this thread how to host a today's watch-only wallet on a webserver with PHP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=836465.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=836465.0) That's good to know, but I would like to use the compressed keys version of Armory or the watch-only wallet. In other words, I don't want to use any bitcoin addresses whose private keys begin with the number 5. |