|
Title: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: Bit_Happy on January 24, 2015, 05:03:42 PM I ran across this and only made it through a couple of paragraphs. The author shows a decent level of effort, but what do you think of his content?
Does anyone have time to summarize/translate this crazy article? Pharaoh Jesus and the 9/11 Stargate. (WTC Pyramid: Part 1) http://thebravenewworldorder.blogspot.com/2006/11/pharaoh-jesus-and-911-stargate.html Enjoy... :D Title: Re: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: Wilikon on January 24, 2015, 05:27:07 PM If even you gave up before the end, what are you expecting from us exactly? ;D I stopped reading when I saw madonna. The author should turn this into an E-book. At 99 cents for kindle he would have made a small fortune. Title: Re: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: Possum577 on January 25, 2015, 07:27:04 AM Enjoy? What lazyiness. People that think 9/11 was a hoax or a conspiracy are those that refuse to believe facts.
Title: Re: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: Nemo1024 on January 25, 2015, 05:12:58 PM Enjoy? What lazyiness. People that think 9/11 was a hoax or a conspiracy are those that refuse to believe facts. I will stop believing that it was a conspiracy, when the following facts are explained: - How 3 buildings fell into their own footprint, when such kind a demolition is a demanding process, any mistake will cause the buildings to topple? - How could all 3 buildings fall down at free-fall speed, when the accumulating rubble below should have been slowing down a natural collapse. - How a fire that was burning sub-steel-melting-point for some 40 minutes made the building collapse, when similar fires, raging for hours in other steel building (with lower grade steel than the one used in WTC) didn't? - How come steel and rock were melted at ground zero for weeks? - How come there were no airplane fragments at the Pentagon site, and no extensive fire damage? The official argument for Pentagon case was: airplane fuel is not hot enough. Shouldn't they have come to at least a consistent explanation? - How could a pilot who could barely control a Cessna, make a descending turn, zeroing in onto Pentagon? - Where is the gold from WTC7? - What about the acoustic analysis of explosions coming shortly before the towers were pulled down? There are many more. There are also some quite obvious false leads among the conspiracy facts discussions, possibly having been planted later to discredit _any_ discussion around the topic. Title: Re: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: hashman on January 27, 2015, 08:35:21 AM Enjoy? What lazyiness. People that think 9/11 was a hoax or a conspiracy are those that refuse to believe facts. I will stop believing that it was a conspiracy, when the following facts are explained: - How 3 buildings fell into their own footprint, when such kind a demolition is a demanding process, any mistake will cause the buildings to topple? - How could all 3 buildings fall down at free-fall speed, when the accumulating rubble below should have been slowing down a natural collapse. - How a fire that was burning sub-steel-melting-point for some 40 minutes made the building collapse, when similar fires, raging for hours in other steel building (with lower grade steel than the one used in WTC) didn't? - How come steel and rock were melted at ground zero for weeks? - How come there were no airplane fragments at the Pentagon site, and no extensive fire damage? The official argument for Pentagon case was: airplane fuel is not hot enough. Shouldn't they have come to at least a consistent explanation? - How could a pilot who could barely control a Cessna, make a descending turn, zeroing in onto Pentagon? - Where is the gold from WTC7? - What about the acoustic analysis of explosions coming shortly before the towers were pulled down? There are many more. There are also some quite obvious false leads among the conspiracy facts discussions, possibly having been planted later to discredit _any_ discussion around the topic. Nobody conspired. Accidents and coincidences do happen you know. Title: Re: Does anyone have time to summarize/'translate' this crazy article? Post by: Spendulus on January 27, 2015, 07:23:51 PM Enjoy? What lazyiness. People that think 9/11 was a hoax or a conspiracy are those that refuse to believe facts. I will stop believing that it was a conspiracy, when the following facts are explained: - How 3 buildings fell into their own footprint, when such kind a demolition is a demanding process, any mistake will cause the buildings to topple? - How could all 3 buildings fall down at free-fall speed, when the accumulating rubble below should have been slowing down a natural collapse. - How a fire that was burning sub-steel-melting-point for some 40 minutes made the building collapse, when similar fires, raging for hours in other steel building (with lower grade steel than the one used in WTC) didn't? - How come steel and rock were melted at ground zero for weeks? - How come there were no airplane fragments at the Pentagon site, and no extensive fire damage? The official argument for Pentagon case was: airplane fuel is not hot enough. Shouldn't they have come to at least a consistent explanation? - How could a pilot who could barely control a Cessna, make a descending turn, zeroing in onto Pentagon? - Where is the gold from WTC7? - What about the acoustic analysis of explosions coming shortly before the towers were pulled down? There are many more. There are also some quite obvious false leads among the conspiracy facts discussions, possibly having been planted later to discredit _any_ discussion around the topic. - How 3 buildings fell into their own footprint, when such kind a demolition is a demanding process, any mistake will cause the buildings to topple? They fell in the direct of gravity. Down. - How could all 3 buildings fall down at free-fall speed, when the accumulating rubble below should have been slowing down a natural collapse. No it would not "slow a natural collapse." - How a fire that was burning sub-steel-melting-point for some 40 minutes made the building collapse, when similar fires, raging for hours in other steel building (with lower grade steel than the one used in WTC) didn't? Once steel is hot it has no strength. Ever seen a blacksmith working steel? - How come steel and rock were melted at ground zero for weeks? Well what should they do? Unmelt? - How come there were no airplane fragments at the Pentagon site, and no extensive fire damage? The official argument for Pentagon case was: airplane fuel is not hot enough. Shouldn't they have come to at least a consistent explanation? Aluminum and kerosene burn - fuel and oxidizer. There is nothing left but ashes. - How could a pilot who could barely control a Cessna, make a descending turn, zeroing in onto Pentagon? He pointed the plane at it? - Where is the gold from WTC7? Stolen? It was never there? It's still there? |