Enjoy? What lazyiness. People that think 9/11 was a hoax or a conspiracy are those that refuse to believe facts.
I will stop believing that it was a conspiracy, when the following facts are explained:
- How 3 buildings fell into their own footprint, when such kind a demolition is a demanding process, any mistake will cause the buildings to topple?
- How could all 3 buildings fall down at free-fall speed, when the accumulating rubble below should have been slowing down a natural collapse.
- How a fire that was burning sub-steel-melting-point for some 40 minutes made the building collapse, when similar fires, raging for hours in other steel building (with lower grade steel than the one used in WTC) didn't?
- How come steel and rock were melted at ground zero for weeks?
- How come there were no airplane fragments at the Pentagon site, and no extensive fire damage? The official argument for Pentagon case was: airplane fuel is not hot enough. Shouldn't they have come to at least a consistent explanation?
- How could a pilot who could barely control a Cessna, make a descending turn, zeroing in onto Pentagon?
- Where is the gold from WTC7?
- What about the acoustic analysis of explosions coming shortly before the towers were pulled down?
There are many more. There are also some quite obvious false leads among the conspiracy facts discussions, possibly having been planted later to discredit _any_ discussion around the topic.
