|
Title: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 02:45:33 AM This is a Demand of Money Required by Law before taking someone to small claims court
TheBitMan owes RandomQ $600, and has 24 hrs to pay via bitcoins to the address below My Payment address 1Kf5qMuQkN3T2dAR4EPeBZREnfy6C7MWAS --------------------------------------------------- $40 - Unique Transaction ID # 5KC55551L6278421G $20 - Unique Transaction ID # 83563526SH281730U $50 - Unique Transaction ID # 57907370R64832243 $50 - Unique Transaction ID # 5XJ43285W8169715B $40 - Unique Transaction ID # 7UR80556E2735483X $200 - Unique Transaction ID # 0JX22215FH012201M $200 - Unique Transaction ID # 5PC314948F217464A ---------------------------------------------------- A small Claims court filing will be filed in Suffolk County, New York Against TheBitMan superbowlchampsnygiants@yahoo.com thebitman@aol.com and if he is a minor his parent will be added to the claim. I have possible names of TheBitMan and his Parents ST***** A***** TE*** A***** CH***** A***** This Thread will be for the process of documenting my small claims filing, Please Flame in the main Post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83679.420 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83679.420) Thank You IANAL / TINLA = "I am not a lawyer" / "This is not legal advice" Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: John (John K.) on August 07, 2012, 02:56:05 AM This is a Demand of Money Required by Law before taking someone to small claims court I thought that by law you're required to either send a certified recipient mail to his address or phone him to tell him verbally? Not too sure about this though. ;)TheBitMan owes RandomQ $600, and has 24 hrs to pay via bitcoins to the address below My Payment address 1Kf5qMuQkN3T2dAR4EPeBZREnfy6C7MWAS --------------------------------------------------- $40 - Unique Transaction ID # 5KC55551L6278421G $20 - Unique Transaction ID # 83563526SH281730U $50 - Unique Transaction ID # 57907370R64832243 $50 - Unique Transaction ID # 5XJ43285W8169715B $40 - Unique Transaction ID # 7UR80556E2735483X $200 - Unique Transaction ID # 0JX22215FH012201M $200 - Unique Transaction ID # 5PC314948F217464A ---------------------------------------------------- A small Claims court filing will be filed in Suffolk County, New York Against TheBitMan superbowlchampsnygiants@yahoo.com thebitman@aol.com and if he is a minor his parent will be added to the claim. I have possible names of TheBitMan and his Parents ST***** A***** TE*** A***** CH***** A***** This Thread will be for the process of documenting my small claims filing, Please Flame in the main Post. Thank You Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 03:01:50 AM I thought that by law you're required to either send a certified recipient mail to his address or phone him to tell him verbally? Not too sure about this though. ;) Before a small claim you must request that the money be paid back, via any method. Once I file a john doe small court claim, then I can get his info from paypal,yahoo, and aol and serve him with the real claim. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: John (John K.) on August 07, 2012, 03:05:11 AM I thought that by law you're required to either send a certified recipient mail to his address or phone him to tell him verbally? Not too sure about this though. ;) Before a small claim you must request that the money be paid back, via any method. Once I file a john doe small court claim, then I can get his info from paypal,yahoo, and aol and serve him with the claim. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 03:06:58 AM http://i1261.photobucket.com/albums/ii582/GreenBTC/thebitman1.jpg
Email sent to all known Emails addresses http://i1261.photobucket.com/albums/ii582/GreenBTC/Untitled.jpg Image showing $600 reversed from my account. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 03:36:20 AM Thank you to the Admins for providing the Message Logs (of messages between RandomQ and TheBitMan)
I sold him BTC from June 3, 2012 to June 17, 2012 and have the message logs to prove it 7.7 BTC $40 3.69 BTC $20 8.54 BTC $50 8.62 BTC $50 6.75 BTC $40 31.40 BTC $200 31.55 BTC $200 ---------------- Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 03:45:42 AM Small claims court paperwork is all filled out and ready to be signed by me in front of a Notary.
Since the 24 Hour deadline is after business hours on 8/7/2012, I will get it signed and mailed on 8/8/2012. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Turbor on August 07, 2012, 05:57:14 PM how did he pay you ?
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: D4CH on August 07, 2012, 06:05:22 PM Please follow up on this, if something happens! I'm quite interested in this.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 07, 2012, 08:47:08 PM how did he pay you ? Paypal He owes 13 people around $4300. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 09, 2012, 05:09:55 AM The 24hr Deadline is over with and payment has not been made.
"TheBitMan" is said to be making a payment Friday or Saturday this week. The small claims court paper is filled out and ready to go, I will need to visit a notary before they are sent out to court. For Every $500 in payment made to the group it would pay off $70 of the debt. Getting Paid Every two weeks, would pay off the debt in around 4 and 1/2 months. I'm estimating that the court will issue a judgement in around ~2 months time. So I'm willing to take the risk and go for a small claims court payout. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: TheBitMan on August 09, 2012, 11:49:49 AM The 24hr Deadline is over with and payment has not been made. It might be more than $500.. but do what you want to do."TheBitMan" is said to be making a payment Friday or Saturday this week. The small claims court paper is filled out and ready to go, I will need to visit a notary before they are sent out to court. For Every $500 in payment made to the group it would pay off $70 of the debt. Getting Paid Every two weeks, would pay off the debt in around 4 and 1/2 months. I'm estimating that the court will issue a judgement in around ~2 months time. So I'm willing to take the risk and go for a small claims court payout. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Kluge on August 09, 2012, 11:55:45 AM So.... you're going to try suing a minor for breech of contract? I'm pretty sure you can't add his parents to a claim, because the contract wasn't valid in the first place.
IANAL, either, though, so maybe someone will clear this up for me. I've never really understand why you could sue a minor for breaking your window, but not for failing to fulfill a contractual obligation -- or if this could even be considered a contract since it was an "immediate" transaction. Pretty sure minors couldn't get away with taking goods from a store and not paying, but I guess that'd be a more clear-cut case of theft. Oh, well - interested to see what comes of this. Shitty situation for everyone - sorry you both are going through this. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 09, 2012, 01:23:14 PM So.... you're going to try suing a minor for breech of contract? I'm pretty sure you can't add his parents to a claim, because the contract wasn't valid in the first place. IANAL, either, though, so maybe someone will clear this up for me. I've never really understand why you could sue a minor for breaking your window, but not for failing to fulfill a contractual obligation -- or if this could even be considered a contract since it was an "immediate" transaction. Pretty sure minors couldn't get away with taking goods from a store and not paying, but I guess that'd be a more clear-cut case of theft. Oh, well - interested to see what comes of this. Shitty situation for everyone - sorry you both are going through this. Option 1 What if an adult makes a contract with a minor because the minor claims to be over eighteen? If a minor lies about his or her age when signing a contract, and the other person had good reasons to believe that the minor was capable of making a contract, the minor will not be allowed to cancel the contract. Option 2 If the minor knowingly makes a false representation about his age for the purpose of acquiring goods or services then claiming the defense of infancy, the minor could be committing the crime of theft by deception. While minors may void contracts they can still be charged with a crime if their intent is criminal in nature. Paypal accounts require you to be 18 years old. 2.1 Eligibility. To be eligible to use the PayPal Services, you must be at least 18 years old and a resident of the United States or one of the countries listed on the PayPal WorldWide page. This Agreement applies only to Users who are residents of the United States. If you are a resident of another country, you may access the agreement that applies to you from our website in your country. TheBitman Lied about his Age by creating a Paypal account, when using that account he commited fraud by lying about his age to other people. If the small claims case gets throw out, I will proceed with a criminal compliant on fraud charges. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Kluge on August 09, 2012, 01:29:56 PM So.... you're going to try suing a minor for breech of contract? I'm pretty sure you can't add his parents to a claim, because the contract wasn't valid in the first place. IANAL, either, though, so maybe someone will clear this up for me. I've never really understand why you could sue a minor for breaking your window, but not for failing to fulfill a contractual obligation -- or if this could even be considered a contract since it was an "immediate" transaction. Pretty sure minors couldn't get away with taking goods from a store and not paying, but I guess that'd be a more clear-cut case of theft. Oh, well - interested to see what comes of this. Shitty situation for everyone - sorry you both are going through this. Option 1 What if an adult makes a contract with a minor because the minor claims to be over eighteen? If a minor lies about his or her age when signing a contract, and the other person had good reasons to believe that the minor was capable of making a contract, the minor will not be allowed to cancel the contract. Option 2 If the minor knowingly makes a false representation about his age for the purpose of acquiring goods or services then claiming the defense of infancy, the minor could be committing the crime of theft by deception. While minors may void contracts they can still be charged with a crime if their intent is criminal in nature. Paypal accounts require you to be 18 years old. 2.1 Eligibility. To be eligible to use the PayPal Services, you must be at least 18 years old and a resident of the United States or one of the countries listed on the PayPal WorldWide page. This Agreement applies only to Users who are residents of the United States. If you are a resident of another country, you may access the agreement that applies to you from our website in your country. TheBitman Lied about his Age by creating a Paypal account, when using that account he commited fraud by lying about his age. If the small claims case gets throw out, I will proceed with a criminal compliant on fraud charges. You could tell PayPal he lied about his age, which is a ToS violation, so it might be even more difficult for BitMan to recover funds from them, but that sounds counter-productive. It seems like a tragedy to press criminal charges against someone because they had PayPal funds frozen and didn't have reserve funds to cover the problem. I strongly suggest he tells his parents, now, as I believe that was previously only being considered. I'll check with some other lenders and see if we can get this situation resolved amicably for everyone. Please do not press criminal charges against him... ETA: Hrm. After talking with someone else... I take back everything I've read in this thread, assuming the BitMan is not a minor. If BitMan is a minor, I'd be willing to go splitsies on a notarized, co-signed, secured loan to him. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: rjk on August 09, 2012, 01:39:14 PM Have fun proving intent.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 09, 2012, 01:45:51 PM So.... you're going to try suing a minor for breech of contract? I'm pretty sure you can't add his parents to a claim, because the contract wasn't valid in the first place. IANAL, either, though, so maybe someone will clear this up for me. I've never really understand why you could sue a minor for breaking your window, but not for failing to fulfill a contractual obligation -- or if this could even be considered a contract since it was an "immediate" transaction. Pretty sure minors couldn't get away with taking goods from a store and not paying, but I guess that'd be a more clear-cut case of theft. Oh, well - interested to see what comes of this. Shitty situation for everyone - sorry you both are going through this. Option 1 What if an adult makes a contract with a minor because the minor claims to be over eighteen? If a minor lies about his or her age when signing a contract, and the other person had good reasons to believe that the minor was capable of making a contract, the minor will not be allowed to cancel the contract. Option 2 If the minor knowingly makes a false representation about his age for the purpose of acquiring goods or services then claiming the defense of infancy, the minor could be committing the crime of theft by deception. While minors may void contracts they can still be charged with a crime if their intent is criminal in nature. Paypal accounts require you to be 18 years old. 2.1 Eligibility. To be eligible to use the PayPal Services, you must be at least 18 years old and a resident of the United States or one of the countries listed on the PayPal WorldWide page. This Agreement applies only to Users who are residents of the United States. If you are a resident of another country, you may access the agreement that applies to you from our website in your country. TheBitman Lied about his Age by creating a Paypal account, when using that account he commited fraud by lying about his age. If the small claims case gets throw out, I will proceed with a criminal compliant on fraud charges. You could tell PayPal he lied about his age, which is a ToS violation, so it might be even more difficult for BitMan to recover funds from them, but that sounds counter-productive. It seems like a tragedy to press criminal charges against someone because they had PayPal funds frozen and didn't have reserve funds to cover the problem. I strongly suggest he tells his parents, now, as I believe that was previously only being considered. I'll check with some other lenders and see if we can get this situation resolved amicably for everyone. Please do not press criminal charges against him... The PayPal account has already been flagged by PayPal Legal Department for AML / KYC Violations. They will only be releasing the fund if he can verify who he is and he is over 18 and the funds are not proceeds of criminal operations. There is a chance the the Account will be Seized outright since he can't prove he is 18 till June 2013. This is not a victim less crime, I've had damages (NSF Fee's+ bank charges) due the paypal charge backs. Paypal Collection Department is trying to collect from me. I've had to close Bank Accounts and stop selling on Ebay because of this. My loses due to this are way over the original amount I have lost. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 09, 2012, 01:51:53 PM Have fun proving intent. The perpetrator's intent to deceive is usually the hardest element of a fraud to prove. The following are examples which have been used to prove an intent to deceive: Admissions Alteration of documents Concealment of evidence Confessions Destruction of evidence False statements (lies) Obstruction of justice Pattern of conduct (repetition of behavior) Personal gain Testimony of a co-conspirator Did he brag about the money his was making on a public place that keeps records IE. Twitter He made a false statement to paypal about his age, otherwise he wouldn't be able to do any of this I'm not sure yet how much money "TheBitMan" made but he was selling BTC for $7-10 when the price was ~$5. so that would be personal gain Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 09, 2012, 02:06:30 PM What Does it Mean when Somebody Commits a Fraud or Misrepresentation in Creating the Contract?
In general, a party engages in fraud when he or she misrepresents a material fact to induce another party to act or refrain from acting towards formation of a contract. Persons charging other with fraud must prove that the person making the representation knew or should have known that it was false, that he or she intended for the other party to rely on it, and that the party did in fact rely on it, resulting in damages. If i had known that he lied about his age to get a paypal account, I would not have done any business with him. I knew that you had to be over 18 to have a paypal account, therefor he misrepresented himself as being over 18 to anyone he did business with. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: BCB on August 09, 2012, 02:14:36 PM ETA: Hrm. After talking with someone else... I take back everything I've read in this thread, assuming the BitMan is not a minor. If BitMan is a minor, I'd be willing to go splitsies on a notarized, co-signed, secured loan to him. Kluge, Have you been following this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83679.0 A number or Board Members have been bending over backwards to help this "kid" (if he is indeed under 18) out. Two lenders passed on a loan with very favorable terms because the TheBitMan would not agree to some of their verification terms. It was only after serious talk of a small claims that he has even agreed to make any payment. And still no one has yet to see any funds back. Waiting.... Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Turbor on August 09, 2012, 06:24:07 PM No mercy ! Let the kid bleed for his actions. The earlier he learns this lessons the better for him.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Bjork on August 09, 2012, 07:29:48 PM And this is why you never use pay-pal.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Dorkslayz on August 09, 2012, 10:29:49 PM Obviously onlooking this situation from both perspectives, I wouldn't like to be in the situation of the "kid" (if he is under 18) having to tell his parents and it would be very embarrassing and I imagine he would be ashamed of it.
However, he did defraud the OP out of a large sum of money. I think in this situation the OP does deserve to win and the kid to go punished for his actions. Just my 2 cents. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: repentance on August 10, 2012, 05:38:45 AM If you'd taken it to Judge Judy you would have got free publicity for Bitcoin as well as your money back. ;D
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Gladamas on August 10, 2012, 06:48:37 AM If you'd taken it to Judge Judy you would have got free publicity for Bitcoin as well as your money back. ;D +1. But then she would say something stupid like "What the fuck is Bitcoin? Nobody cares about this shit. Case dismissed." Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 14, 2012, 12:04:34 AM Well since I received a payment on Saturday, And do to the request of BCB.
I have postponed the Small Claims Court. But if this debt gets sent to collections(PayPal), I will file the small claims. Currently this is just a debt to paypal they have kept it locally and not sold it to an outside collection company. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Shadow383 on August 15, 2012, 02:58:23 AM Well since I received a payment on Saturday, And do to the request of BCB. Why don't you just get in contact with the parents?I have postponed the Small Claims Court. But if this debt gets sent to collections(PayPal), I will file the small claims. Currently this is just a debt to paypal they have kept it locally and not sold it to an outside collection company. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: dissipate on August 23, 2012, 08:32:11 PM And this is why you never use pay-pal. QFT I don't think I will touch PayPal with a 50 foot pole after reading this. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on August 29, 2012, 08:19:29 PM Looks like we might get paid in full sometime this weekend ;D
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: davidspitzer on August 29, 2012, 09:19:24 PM So.... you're going to try suing a minor for breech of contract? I'm pretty sure you can't add his parents to a claim, because the contract wasn't valid in the first place. IANAL, either, though, so maybe someone will clear this up for me. I've never really understand why you could sue a minor for breaking your window, but not for failing to fulfill a contractual obligation -- or if this could even be considered a contract since it was an "immediate" transaction. Pretty sure minors couldn't get away with taking goods from a store and not paying, but I guess that'd be a more clear-cut case of theft. Oh, well - interested to see what comes of this. Shitty situation for everyone - sorry you both are going through this. Option 1 What if an adult makes a contract with a minor because the minor claims to be over eighteen? If a minor lies about his or her age when signing a contract, and the other person had good reasons to believe that the minor was capable of making a contract, the minor will not be allowed to cancel the contract. Option 2 If the minor knowingly makes a false representation about his age for the purpose of acquiring goods or services then claiming the defense of infancy, the minor could be committing the crime of theft by deception. While minors may void contracts they can still be charged with a crime if their intent is criminal in nature. Paypal accounts require you to be 18 years old. 2.1 Eligibility. To be eligible to use the PayPal Services, you must be at least 18 years old and a resident of the United States or one of the countries listed on the PayPal WorldWide page. This Agreement applies only to Users who are residents of the United States. If you are a resident of another country, you may access the agreement that applies to you from our website in your country. TheBitman Lied about his Age by creating a Paypal account, when using that account he commited fraud by lying about his age. If the small claims case gets throw out, I will proceed with a criminal compliant on fraud charges. You could tell PayPal he lied about his age, which is a ToS violation, so it might be even more difficult for BitMan to recover funds from them, but that sounds counter-productive. It seems like a tragedy to press criminal charges against someone because they had PayPal funds frozen and didn't have reserve funds to cover the problem. I strongly suggest he tells his parents, now, as I believe that was previously only being considered. I'll check with some other lenders and see if we can get this situation resolved amicably for everyone. Please do not press criminal charges against him... ETA: Hrm. After talking with someone else... I take back everything I've read in this thread, assuming the BitMan is not a minor. If BitMan is a minor, I'd be willing to go splitsies on a notarized, co-signed, secured loan to him. Minors are allowed to disaffirm and, in effect, to walk away from most of the contracts they enter. This, of course, is one of the reasons merchants usually refuse to enter contracts with minors unless a parent or other financially responsible adult co-signs. Contracts that a minor can disaffirm are voidable, meaning they can be invalidated by choice. A voidable contract, however, is valid and enforceable unless and until it is canceled. If the minor still has what he received from the other party, he must return it to the other party upon seeking to avoid the contract. If he does not return the property in such a situation, he cannot avoid the contract. If the minor cannot return what he has received pursuant to the contract because it has been spent, damaged or destroyed, he still can avoid the contract. He can avoid the contract and is only required to return that part of the consideration he still has. Even if he has nothing left, or what he has is damaged property, he still can avoid the contract. Helen, age 17, wanted to buy a motorcycle. She did not have the money to pay cash but persuaded the dealer to sell a cycle to her on credit. The dealer did so partly because Helen said that she was 22 and showed the dealer an identification card that falsely stated her age as 22. Helen drove the motorcycle away. A few days later, she damaged it and then returned it to the dealer and stated that she avoided the contract because she was a minor. The dealer said that she could not do so because (a) she had misrepresented her age and (b) the motorcycle was damaged. Can she avoid the contract? Yes. In a state that follows the common law rule, neither the damage to the property nor Helen’s misrepresentation of her age will prevent her from avoiding the contract. Some states would hold that because of the misrepresentation of age, Helen must pay for the damage that she has done, but she can avoid the contract. A few states would hold that Helen cannot avoid the contract because she misrepresented her age. Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: BCB on August 29, 2012, 09:21:22 PM Are you a lawyer?
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: Gladamas on August 29, 2012, 09:46:40 PM Are you a lawyer? +1. Do you take BTC for legal advice? ;D Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: davidspitzer on August 29, 2012, 10:51:26 PM Are you a lawyer? Working on it. I recently finished law school and took the bar in CA. I am wasting the results Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: BCB on August 29, 2012, 10:52:53 PM Congrats! Thanks for the free advice. Bitcoin could use some good legal minds.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: RandomQ on September 08, 2012, 12:26:56 AM I have been Paid for the Full Amount that paypal Reversed from my Account.
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: bg002h on September 08, 2012, 01:56:49 AM Did this go through the court? Is this the first completed Bitcoin lawsuit?
Title: Re: RandomQ VS TheBitMan Small Claims Court State of New York Post by: BCB on September 08, 2012, 01:58:35 AM Paypal release the held funds and TheBitMan actually paid everyone back before it went to court.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83679.0 |
