|
Title: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: Avgust Albertson on April 22, 2013, 08:29:27 AM Who knows are there any pools or large miners running “child pays for parent” patch?
Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: DannyHamilton on April 22, 2013, 04:02:00 PM None that I'm aware of, but I sincerely hope that miners (and pools) will begin implementing this functionality soon. It would be more profitable for them, and significantly improve the usability of Bitcoin.
Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: ehmdjii on September 10, 2014, 06:58:49 PM afaik eligius has implemented this, but i also would like to know which other pools do so.
Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: williamj2543 on September 10, 2014, 06:59:55 PM What is this "child pays for payment" thing
Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: DannyHamilton on September 10, 2014, 07:02:37 PM afaik eligius has implemented this, but i also would like to know which other pools do so. Do you have a link to any information stating that this is true, or is it just something you think you heard someone say somewhere once? Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: hayabusa911 on September 10, 2014, 07:31:47 PM Yep, a source explaining would be amazing.
Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: Cyrus on September 10, 2014, 08:08:15 PM note that some miners (eligius) implement a "child pays for parent" policy: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1647 There's also some info on the Eligius website, that's all I could find. Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: Kluge on September 10, 2014, 08:12:25 PM What is this "child pays for payment" thing More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all).Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: BitCoinDream on September 11, 2014, 08:31:11 AM What is this "child pays for payment" thing More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all).Does it mean that it would lead to another Tx in reality ? I mean to say, if Tx A has 0 mining fee and Tx B is using the o/p of Tx A, then Tx B can pay the miner fee for Tx A & Tx B to get them accepted fast ? Title: Re: “child pays for parent” patch Post by: Loophole on September 11, 2014, 02:22:41 PM What is this "child pays for payment" thing More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all).Does it mean that it would lead to another Tx in reality ? I mean to say, if Tx A has 0 mining fee and Tx B is using the o/p of Tx A, then Tx B can pay the miner fee for Tx A & Tx B to get them accepted fast ? Pretty much so. The ideal situation is that the miners will not consider the transaction one by one, but the whole chain of unconfirmed transactions. |