Avgust Albertson (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
April 22, 2013, 08:29:27 AM |
|
Who knows are there any pools or large miners running “child pays for parent” patch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4623
|
|
April 22, 2013, 04:02:00 PM |
|
None that I'm aware of, but I sincerely hope that miners (and pools) will begin implementing this functionality soon. It would be more profitable for them, and significantly improve the usability of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ehmdjii
|
|
September 10, 2014, 06:58:49 PM |
|
afaik eligius has implemented this, but i also would like to know which other pools do so.
|
BTC: 1LsD5HpnX1Kfyti7CnHiVB1rjUEXGqmR2H
LTC: LQbpdMZmYyJa9bJG6NweBNxkSTfgZorkrG
|
|
|
|
williamj2543
|
|
September 10, 2014, 06:59:55 PM |
|
What is this "child pays for payment" thing
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ |
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4623
|
|
September 10, 2014, 07:02:37 PM |
|
afaik eligius has implemented this, but i also would like to know which other pools do so.
Do you have a link to any information stating that this is true, or is it just something you think you heard someone say somewhere once? |
|
|
|
|
|
hayabusa911
|
|
September 10, 2014, 07:31:47 PM |
|
Yep, a source explaining would be amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
Cyrus
Ninja
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2949
|
|
September 10, 2014, 08:08:15 PM |
|
There's also some info on the Eligius website, that's all I could find. |
|
|
|
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
|
|
September 10, 2014, 08:12:25 PM |
|
What is this "child pays for payment" thing
More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all). |
|
|
|
|
BitCoinDream
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
|
|
September 11, 2014, 08:31:11 AM |
|
What is this "child pays for payment" thing
More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all). Does it mean that it would lead to another Tx in reality ? I mean to say, if Tx A has 0 mining fee and Tx B is using the o/p of Tx A, then Tx B can pay the miner fee for Tx A & Tx B to get them accepted fast ? |
|
|
|
|
Loophole
|
|
September 11, 2014, 02:22:41 PM |
|
What is this "child pays for payment" thing
More intuitively, it could be called "receiver pays for sender." If a transaction lacks a transaction fee where it'd be able to be processed in a timely manner, the receiver ("child") can pay the tx fee so it'll be processed faster (or at all). Does it mean that it would lead to another Tx in reality ? I mean to say, if Tx A has 0 mining fee and Tx B is using the o/p of Tx A, then Tx B can pay the miner fee for Tx A & Tx B to get them accepted fast ? Pretty much so. The ideal situation is that the miners will not consider the transaction one by one, but the whole chain of unconfirmed transactions. |
|
|
|
|
