Bitcoin Forum

Alik Bakhshi

Russia is the most aggressive country

    Following the Second World War, Russia is the only country that has seized foreign territories and even the whole state. Neither the United States, nor the United Kingdom, nor Canada, as a winner country, unlike Russia, did not acquire a meter of foreign land, but Russia seized vast territories:
 - 10% of the territory of Finland, and this is almost the territory of Switzerland,
 - annexed part of Germany (East Prussia),
 - three states Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia joined the USSR,
 - the huge territories of Poland were torn away in favor of the USSR,
 - annexed part of Romania (Bessarabia),
 - Tyva was annexed (in 1944),
 - part of the territory of Japan (Southern Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands) has been annexed.

  It should be noted that these territorial acquisitions of Moscow lie on the conscience of the American President Roosevelt, who completely trusted Uncle Joe, in spite of Churchill's warnings. But America had a colossal opportunity to stop the insatiability of Stalin. I am sure that if it were not for America, and the Russians had the first to have an atomic bomb, they would not fail to take advantage of this circumstance, and the world would be different today.

   At the end of the 20th century, before the collapse of the Evil Empire, when its economy was already breathing deeply, Moscow attempted to seize another country - Afghanistan. However, this time the Russians ran into a people that belonged to their freedom, as to a shrine and, despite their enormous superiority, the Russians suffered a shameful defeat (1).
    But what is surprising is that even after the partial collapse of the empire, Russia has not lost its predatory nature, which is well illustrated by the attack on Georgia and Ukraine. And again, through the fault of America, which did not take advantage of the situation to complete the disintegration of the evil Empire, the West today has problems with its revanchism. Not understanding President Bush Jr., what is Russia and the Russian people (2) with its imperial worldview in a compartment with Great Russian chauvinism (3), allowed Putin's "friend" to pour in Chechnya blood and suppress the shoots of Yeltsin's democracy. And Obama, too intelligent for this case, slipped Russia's attack on Ukraine, although it was clear on all grounds that Ukraine could not avoid military aggression from Russia. In the article Whose Crimea (4) I predicted in 2006 the inevitability of the implementation of the Kremlin's military plans for Ukraine. Moreover, two months before Russia's invasion of Crimea, in an article (5) I wrote that it will take place after the Winter Olympics in Sochi. Obama not only did not dare to contradict Putin's tricks, although America on the Budapest Memorandum was the guarantor of Ukraine's security, but also refused to help Ukraine in arming.
    The West does not want to take seriously the revanchist aspirations of Putin, as it once let Hitler revanchism, which in the end could lead to a big war, for Putin will not definitely stop in Ukraine.

14.03.17.

Totally agree 100000000%,all words in your text is true :-\ Russia is aggressor nr.1 in the world :-\

https://i.imgur.com/aNamELo.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/xmQMRva.jpg

How can you say Russia is the most aggressive country in the world? I think Rome was the most aggressive, than Great Britain, and than North Korea.

OK.. let me answer it, one by one.


Finland allied with Nazi Germany in 1945, and that is how they lost the territory.


Most of the East Prussia was annexed by Poland and not Russia. Russia got less than 10%.


These states were a part of the Nazi Germany. They joined USSR after the WW2.


These territories were having ethnic Russian or Belorussian majority. And still Poland was compensated with Pomerania, Prussia and Silesia. 


Romania was one of the allies of Nazi Germany during Operation Barbarossa. Moldova was taken away as a punishment.


No. They were not annexed. They voted to join the USSR.


Sakhalin / Kuril is disputed territory which was handed over to the USSR at the end of the WW2.

Don't know if number 1, but in top 4 for sure.

Who's known to take down governments, participate in every war, stick it's nose in every foreign politics,etc...? and I'm not speaking of Russia...

It's about the modern world, not the times of Caesar, Atila or Genghis Khan.

It's about late 19th and early 20th century. Countries boundaries have changed a lot in and after that period.
It doesn't prove anything.
Aggressiveness has many forms. It's a perspective.

Give an example please. Thank you.

 As you know, the Russians attacked Finland in 1939, Russian aviation began bombing Helsinki, which is why the USSR was expelled from the League of Nations. Russia annexed 11% of the territory of Finland together with the second largest city of Vyborg. The entire Finnish population was expelled from the annexed territory.

  Three countries Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were also annexed to the USSR before the Second World War, and not after the war, as you write. You need to know the story, not lie. I'll try to write in more detail about the aggressive actions of Russia in separate topics.

if it is the modern world youare talking about, then it is not Russia, it is korea I think.

LOL
Azerbaijan annexed Latvia under Jew and Latvian Comissars Rule.
What have Russians to do with this?
Russians are victims of Jew-Latvian Communist Dictatorship.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_Riflemen

http://www.infotop.lv/uploads/img/articles/large/Maskava-1920.jpg

Azerbaijan is a real danger to to World.
 (http://www.1news.az/society/20170605044220447.html) (In Russian)

Well this is kinda a point of view just from one side.

 - 10% of the territory of Finland, and this is almost the territory of Switzerland,
 - annexed part of Germany (East Prussia),
 - three states Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia joined the USSR,
 - the huge territories of Poland were torn away in favor of the USSR,
 - annexed part of Romania (Bessarabia),
 - Tyva was annexed (in 1944),
 - part of the territory of Japan (Southern Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands) has been annexed.

Stuff like that you can basically write about every single country in the world.

Example with Poland, it's not like Russia wasn't under occupation before.

Russia was a democratic country, but Jew-Latvian Communists have changed it to USSR.

http://cs621123.vk.me/v621123614/e407/nthtJd7ftnE.jpg

oh please no write these bullshit. small country like Latvia is aggressor for russia? hahahahahaha:D

Bravo!!! And so the Latvians, together with the Estonians, exiled their people to Siberia for hard labor! And Russian officers and communists settled in the vacated houses. You made a historic discovery. My bow to you and heartfelt congratulations.

Meshadi Azizbekov (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meshadi_Azizbekov) is a Russian under Your distort imagenery or Azeri?

There was Mister Juhashwili, who had troubles to speak Russian correctly.
But You call his Jew Comunist Gang as Russian Officers.

http://ilmari.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/sites/default/files/domain-1374/kuvat/brest_0.jpg

What becomes local Russian Residents of Manchuria in 1945?

http://img.gazeta.ru/files3/403/7696403/upload-s05-pic4_zoom-1000x1000-37074.jpg

The Class Conflict Theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict) was a basis for become troubles under this System.

This is not a secret from "200 Years Togheter" (https://www.amazon.com/Hundred-Together-Complete-Volumes-Dvesti/dp/5969707023/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1498562456&sr=8-2&keywords=200+years+together+solzhenitsyn) was published.

Russia was never a democratic country. That is why Russians have such a feature as the slave kneeling attitude towards their rulers. It was not until the Communist revolution, and so it is now.

The USA will never interfere with what the Russians do except they impose sanctions on them and that's all they can do, Russia is a formidable opponent with Nuclear weapons.

The fact is that the Russian people can not exist in conditions of democracy.

Russia was never the aggressor, and all the territories that acceded to it is the result of military victories over the aggressors. In addition to the war of 1939: the Soviet Union is strategically important to occupy 10% of Finnish territory and to move the border away from St. Petersburg. Because everyone understood the inevitability of war with Germany, and Finland with their Mannerheim line was their ally.

Pretty agressive, i won't deny. But don't know if the "most".

 First, the Mannerheim Line is intended for defense from Russia, and not for aggression. Secondly, Russia's attack on Finland in 1939 did not help in the war with Germany, but on the contrary Russia acquired the enemy. By the way, thanks to the Mannerheim Line, the Russians lost many soldiers and military equipment and could not advance into the interior of Finland. The Finnish people showed heroism in this war, and women took part in the defense. Finland could not be made a Russian colony, and today Finland is the most prosperous country in the world, the Finns knew why they needed freedom.

Azerbaidjans in ISIS
 
http://www.vesti.az/upload/images/news/2017/june/16/big/316208e731285c79bc7188b2685304c0.jpg

http://www.vesti.az/upload/images/news/2017/june/16/big/1b25e9ddf27db2828fd619d93f2df013.jpg

http://www.vesti.az/upload/images/news/2017/june/16/big/84b224157d2b5f0fe314645273609506.jpg

http://www.vesti.az/news/334222 (In Russian)

http://www.vesti.az/upload/images/news/2017/june/16/big/4a0dc87614a0b57aa95b470503bb2490.jpg

People arrested for Porn distribuition in Azerbaijan.

http://www.vesti.az/news/334206 (In Russian)

History shows a lot of facts when the state sponsored some organizations that later started their activities against this state.

Do you actually share old nazi, racist propaganda in complete seriousness on this forum?  :o You "totally" do, huh?

Hitler stated in Mein Kampf his belief that the Russian state was the work of German elements in the state and not of the Slavs:

    Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing Russia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race.

"Need, hunger, lack of comfort have been the Russians' lot for centuries. No false compassion, as their stomachs are perfectly extendible. Don't try to impose the German standards and to change their style of life. Their only wish is to be ruled by the Germans. [...] Help yourselves, and may God help you!"
— "12 precepts for the German officer in the East", 1941



    This is an ideological battle and a struggle of races. Here in this struggle stands National Socialism: an ideology based on the value of our Germanic, Nordic blood. ... On the other side stands a population of 180 million, a mixture of races, whose very names are unpronounceable, and whose physique is such that one can shoot them down without pity and compassion. These animals, that torture and ill-treat every prisoner from our side, every wounded man that they come across and do not treat them the way decent soldiers would, you will see for yourself. These people have been welded by the Jews into one religion, one ideology, that is called Bolshevism... When you, my men, fight over there in the East, you are carrying on the same struggle, against the same subhumanity, the same inferior races, that at one time appeared under the name of Huns, another time— 1000 years ago at the time of King Henry and Otto I— under the name of Magyars, another time under the name of Tartars, and still another time under the name of Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Today they appear as Russians under the political banner of Bolshevism.

Heinrich Himmler's speech at Poznań (Posen) on October 4, 1943

What happens to a Russian, to a Czech, does not interest me in the slightest. What the nations can offer in good blood of our type, we will take, if necessary by kidnapping their children and raising them with us. Whether nations live in prosperity or starve to death interests me only in so far as we need them as slaves for our culture; otherwise, it is of no interest to me. Whether 10,000 Russian females fall down from exhaustion while digging an anti-tank ditch interest me only in so far as the anti-tank ditch for Germany is finished. We shall never be rough and heartless when it is not necessary, that is clear. We Germans, who are the only people in the world who have a decent attitude towards animals, will also assume a decent attitude towards these human animals.

You are disgusting.

That applies to your ass too, Alik Bahshi.

http://cripo.info/i/vorio_003.jpg

Who are this prominent people?

It's good that you remembered the ideologist of German fascism, today this role is perfectly demonstrated by the Fuhrer Putin. Moreover, if Hitler divided the nations into higher and lower races, then, for example, Putin completely eliminates the Ukrainian people from history, saying that there is no such people. He believes that Ukrainians are a Russian people.

  I want to notify you as a great expert in ass, which is clear from your post that it has nothing to do with Putin's ass.

  With best wishes Alik Bakhshi

Of course Finland was ready to provide any assistance to the enemy of the Soviet Union :)
The President of Finland P. E. Svinhufvud in 1937, said in Berlin that "the enemy of Russia must always be a friend of Finland". In conversation with the German envoy, he said: "the Russian threat will exist permanently. Therefore, for Finland is good that Germany is strong."
Therefore, the Soviet Union took no walkable Mannerheim line with huge losses. Which could be the basis of the German offensive on Leningrad.

Even while being the most aggressive country, it's not like they're really getting anything out of it. They're military is old and failing, the economy in Russia is absoluetly so bad that the President (Putin) had to go to the extreme of invading another country and showing that they're winning at something to be able to convince the people that they're not a failing country. The only reason Russian had been doing good up to around 2012 was due to OIL being so expensive, now with the downturn of that the country is failing and they don't know what to do.

Most aggressive-- more like the biggest talker out of all the countries. If the US wanted to though, they could flatten them in .2 seconds.

Baltic states was occupied by USSR in 1940. Presidents of Latvia and Estonia were sent to prison in Sibir and their governments resigned. Ultimatum to Lithuania was given to join USSR, otherwise army of USSR would invade country.

You guys can't compare USSR and Russia today, that's like comparing Nazi germany with the todays Germany, makes no sense. And it's not like they've been doing stuff like these.

When you don't like someone you're judging every move they're making.

Before 1940, the Baltic states were ruled by puppet rulers installed by the Nazi Germans. And each of these nations (especially Latvia and Lithuania) had a sizable ethnic German population). The Soviets were afraid that these countries will merge with Germany.

I think Russia only excels in the vast amount of territory, but in terms of military I think superior to northern korea. He said he has a nuclear inside earth if all earth is activated will be destroyed

If the Russians had not attacked Finland in 1939, then perhaps Leningrad was not in a blockade. Russians are looking for enemies, this applies to today. What did Georgia and Ukraine somehow threaten Russia? Why did the Russians attack Ukraine and Georgia? Russia is the empire of Evil, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said. Why did the Russians press the Czechs on Vraclav Square in Prague in 1968? Why did the Russians get into Afghanistan, insidiously killing its president and his family? The Afghans as well as the Finns punished the Russians fighting for their freedom.

But it's funny though how Finns in general are nowadays one of the only people who respect Russians in general instead of irrationally hating them like most of the westerners seem to do  :o

And what about the two world wars in which the Germans and the French killed each other? Do they still hate each other today? So the Finns are Russian today.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KHlj540duQY/UzknfacoSXI/AAAAAAAABPw/zI0drWizkU4/s1600/Artsakh-Tat-Pap.jpg

Tell us about how Azerbaijan respect Multiculturalism.

http://im3.asset.yvimg.kz/userimages/it-len-off/crUT2UyOW0aLN5SGxjx9PUok2h4LWO.jpg

http://c1.mediamax.am/datas/znews/big_efbcd405d6bce1b65a6c8e8dd69d5b9c.jpg

No, presidents of these countries was nationalist dictators, not pro german. And population of ethnic German people was minimal in Baltic states. Only in Memel region german population was bigger, but this region already was under control of Germany before WW2..

Of course, they were progerman. Baltic States were formed under treaty of Brest-Litevsk treaty between Imperial Germany and nascent Soviet Union. Entire economy was controlled by german land owners between medieval times and 1945.

Nazis eventually sought to use them as area to concentrate attack on industrial heartland of european Russia. While I consider it personally to be terrible for natives, fears in Moscow had firm basis in reality.

Speaking of Russia, had to reminiscent of their muscles, as fighting the nation of the country, their combat capability is very strong, I admire their President Vladimir Putin.

When you talk about the combat capability of the Russian army, then you are mistaken. Look at her arms. All of it produced in Soviet times. Any weapon can kill, but in a modern war to win with such a weapon is impossible.

WOW, they look not aggressive or what?

If Russia is the most aggressive country then what will be the title of America. I don't know why the aftermath of the second world war is the measurements of this criteria, we should focus on the present scenario of the world. I think, by the name of terrorism America is planning to site the middle East, so America is the most aggressive country nowadays for me.

People like to hate on Russia. It's fashionable these days.

America is the most aggressive country in the world. It started about 250 years ago when people came to this continent and slaughtered the natives who were here. Theft by force. We're not talking about annexing 10% of a country that was already 5% of the size of our current country. We are talking about 3.5 million square miles being taken by force over the course of many years by people who abandoned their own country because they didn't want to pay taxes.

And since then, a decade hasn't gone by when we were not fighting somebody.

Russia thinks that it is invincible, but it's not so ..
They need to calm down

I really can not, so funny. The impression is that soon children will scare Russia and Putin. Well, all together it looks like some kind of insanity.

The current campaign of Russophobia is a tactic to divert attention from the major issues such as ISIS and growing federal debt. More than two dozen nations (including Japan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany, and Saudi Arabia) are currently under American military occupation. And they are still thick enough to accuse the Russians of aggression.

What is this man talking about here? Anyone?  ???

Hey I don't think Russia is the most aggressive country today. It was in the past, yes. But right now, take a look around you. Take some time to read some international news. The most aggressive is China. This country that was once touted as the sleeping dragon is now aggressively trying to steal the number 1 place in the whole world. The dragon is now fully awake. China has become a very rich country with its strong economy. They are now playing an aggressive role not just among its neighboring countries but also worldwide. Border territories are now being claimed by this country regardless of international law.

The Americans have military bases all around the world and are frequently invading the third world nations. And still you claim that Russia is a country which indulges in aggression. What an irony? During the last 3 decades, I have heard about Russians getting militarily engaged in two foreign nations. The first is Georgia (in 2008), and the second is Ukraine (2014). And in both these cases, the fault was with the latter group of nations. Georgia attacked the Russian peace-keepers in South Ossetia, and Ukraine banned the Russian language.

I think for now the most dangerous country is north korea, by having nuclear weapons. And threaten the security of the world

Saudi Arabia is one of the closest allies of the United States of America and is not under American military occupation. Russia is an ally of Bashar al Assad which is responsible for creating ISIS which emerged because of the people feeling hopeless under Assad rule. The father of Bashar al Assad killed 32.000 persons in a single day in the beginning of eighties. Russia is also an ally of Iran , a republic well known for exporting terrorists anywhere in the world.

America doesn't sponsor terrorists like Russia does.

You cannot compare Russia with America, America is the greatest country in the world while Russia is just a communist country which still pays people within 100-150 euro for a month. That is funny considering that this payment is made within 1 or maximum 2 days of work in the USA.

The truth is that many countries have been involved in wars showing an aggressive character,but that doesn't mean that Russia is the most aggressive country.One thing is sure and this is that Russian people are "crazy".

What Russian does not threaten the world with its nuclear weapons? The North Korea's weapons are primitive and can only threaten neighboring countries, and the Russian threat to all. Or have you not heard the phrase "Russia is the only country capable of turning America into radioactive ash".

No country, except for Russia, the modern world has not seized foreign lands, so Russia is the most aggressive country.

Azerbaijanis are DPRK-like zombies.

http://www.mehriban-aliyeva.az/files/preview/2017/2/900x620/14987327241095416330_900x620.jpg

Where is the difference of Turkmenistan to some Azerbaijan ass licking style?

http://s018.radikal.ru/i524/1707/a3/30d8462da3c7.jpg

http://thewanderingscot.com/photos/2013%20Caucasus/Azerbaijan/midis/IMG_4501.JPG

The local sport is searching "agression" in other countries.

http://news.azstatic.com/uploads/W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMTAvMTkvMDUvMjQvMTgvZDc4NTA2MDQtMjEzNS00NDljLTg1NjEtMDRmMGVmOWU3YmExLzc3ODYwLmpwZyJdLFsicCIsInRodW1iIiwiOTAweDYwMiJdXQ?sha=a402a95e01188424

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article749216.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/New%20leader%20of%20North%20Korea%20Kim%20Jong-un%20holds%20a%20weapon

Insane maniacs.

http://www.1news.az/images/articles/2016/12/23/thumb_20161223080018723.jpg

Hangman, beheaded armenian soldier Qyaram Sloyan, awarded from @presidentaz  (https://twitter.com/ArmeniaMODTeam/status/727092489052651520)

You posted a photo of the President of Azerbaijan next to the soldier, like photos with Russian President Putin on the Internet as much as you like.
As I see, you are interested in Azerbaijan, but here is the topic of Russia, so I will put a special topic for Azerbaijan specifically for you.

We have here a claim of American Human Rights Organization Freedom House, and it call Azerbaijan as such most agressive country.

"Aggressive Azerbaijan"
http://www.economist.com/node/11750683

"Azerbaijan planning to divide Iran into 5 countries"
http://www.trackpersia.com/azerbaijan-planning-divide-iran-5-countries/

For better check of Alik mania on spreading Hate to Russia one need to listen this Glossary (http://epfarmenia.am/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/glossary_eng-1.pdf).

So the subject has shifted from Russia to Azerbaijan? Azerbaijan is going to disintegrate once the Russo-Iranian alliance comes to full effect. Azerbaijan will be divided in to three equal parts, with one each going to merge with Russia, Armenia and Iran.

Why so much bull shit and why so many lies bruh? the most aggressive country is Djibouti and then Israel, ;D I don't know how come they assassinated JFK the poor fornicator actor of a president but now they are unable to head shot a few of these world leaders?

Wow, look at aggressive Azerbaijan!



How is possible to deal with someone from Azerbaijan, they are totalitarian aggressive lunatics.

USA have special Law about aggressive Azerbaijan. (https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/892c51/pdf/)

So insanely can speak only those who have never been to Russia, never communicated with the Russians. Wrong opinion about Russia in those people who know about the situation only from news that is broadcast on TV.

Russia is getting more aggressive now, under Putin. What they did in Ukraine was wrong. They should not interfere in the internal matters of Ukraine.

It's good that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania managed to enter NATO, otherwise they would have been occupied by Russia like Ukraine,

Ethnic cleansing is failed, so, eat shit dude.

The so called leader of democracy in the modern world that is the Americans are the most aggressive country currently on the face of the earth. They have been involved in the most wars ever since the second world war and they have even though overthrown dictators, they have made whole regions unstable, look at Iraq,Afghanistan and Libya and look at their plans towards Syria now.

LOL. People escaped from there.
Lituania have highest rate of suicides.
Salaries are lowest in EU.

F#cking liberty.
Who need appartment for $2500? Go in Estonia.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=570&v=-AnuPrxQ3b8

 French public television channel France 2 in an investigative program called the Azerbaijani government a “dictatorship” and its leader, President Ilham Aliyev, a “despot.”

Maybe, i'm between Russia and USA. Both countries think they deserve it all.

The difference between the US and Russia is that Russia captured a lot of foreign land during the Second World War and today continues to capture the lands of foreign states, and the US has not captured a meter of foreign territory.
Article about this difference.

Then why don't you ask your president to join the NATO? Did the NATO help you guys when the Armenians kicked your assess in Nagorno Karabakh? You lost 20% of your territory to some amateur fighters, despite getting support from the ISIS and the Al Qaeda.

Dear, you are again translating the topic of Russia to Azerbaijan. Especially for you, I have posted an article on Azerbaijan, be kind enough to put your thoughts on Azerbaijan in it. Thank you.

What is the need to capture more territory when entire countries are under American military occupation? There are US military bases all over the world, in almost all the continents (perhaps with the exception of Antarctica).

The topic Is about aggressive country.
Independent fonts and US Law give to Azerbaijan such description.

She is aggressive but not the most
There are countries and more terrible

 Which foreign territories of the United States were annexed after World War II?

Why Lithuania not give back to Poland city of Vilno?
What a greedy Lithuania.

http://i.blog.fontanka.ru/photos/2014/09/580x380_vsuV81kc0Mb1f3DbBt85.jpg

These are the problems of Lithuania and Poland. In Russian is a very strange position. Instead of answering for their crimes they always try to divert attention to other topics. On your map no Russian. This is probably because there don't actually own any land? All captured by the others?

This lunatic jerk Alik call USSR as "Russia".
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic was a part of USSR, and under rule of Gangster from Baku (picture in this topic).

 The fact is that here the defenders of Putin's aggressive policy pretend to be fools who do not know the history.

Lithuania and Poland were among the countries which benefited the most from USSR winning the WW2. But even then they would like to complain about the Soviets and their behavior during the war.

What Lithuania & Ukraine are waiting to show how to make the Land restitution what they becomed from "Communist Occupation"?

Stop spreading fake information. Romania and Bulgaria have lovest wages in Europe.
And wages in Lithuania are higher than in your mother Russia.

Lot of benefits - 50 years of occupation, big part of population lost due to deportations to Sibir. Thanks USSR for it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Lithuania#/media/File:Population_of_Lithuania_1915-2014.png

http://s019.radikal.ru/i641/1707/8f/3b8b39f3f25a.png

https://www.geolounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/europe-population-map.png

http://www.financialobserver.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The-Baltic-States.jpg

Effects of EU is evident.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_deportations_from_Lithuania
There is max number reported of 150.000, and from there 60.000 returned to Lithuania.


People is runnining from there - €3500 - appartment on sale in Estonia (http://doska.k-jarve.ee/12562.html)

Demography is one of the key problems in Lithuania. But this is not only problem of Lithuania. Similar situation in Latvia, Estonia, Scandinavian countries. But demography of ex Soviet countries not EU members is even worse.
Emigration is another problem, 50k people every leave country, much less come back. On the other hand, EU opened opportunities to earn higher wages in other countries.

Demography is equally bad or even worse in the regions of Russia which neighbors these Baltic nations, such as Pskov and Novgorod. However, Belarus is an exception. The demography is in quite good state there.

After the annexation of Lithuania by Russia in 1939, 300,000 Lithuanians were deported from their homeland to Siberia only because they were Lithuanians. The small-numbered Lithuanian people were significantly reduced numerically. In the liberated houses Russian officers and officials

We can take into account the fact that from the actions of the Soviet Union, and from the successor to Russia, suffered the entire post-Soviet space. All the countries that were part of the Soviet Union still feel the web of adversity that breeds back in the time of Stalin's repressions.

Sure. Stalin fucked up alot of folk. Back in the twenties there was even famine in central Russia, that resulted in widespread cannibalism.

So what has jewish Georgian commanding multinational COMMUNIST empire has in common with modern nation-state of Russia? Precisely. History.

And nothing more.

1. What have to do Russia to signed document by Etnic Jew from Abhazia Mister Lavreniy Beria as USSR Rapresentant?
2. What is the font for this number? It fit not in the known data.
3. Etnic Russians was deported on the base of this same document.

The the total max number of people deported from Lithuania in 1941 is from 10187 to 17501

Putin returns to Russia an imperial character that carries a potential threat to all former colonies of Russia.

Jerk Alik have nothing to confirm the fake data.

First world countries (with large territory) always tend to be part of the most agressive countries. So yes.

Nowadays i believe the most aggressive country is north Korea, testing a nuclear missile in the 4th of July it is an act of war, now that Trump have the presidency of the USA who knows what will happen now :/

If you recall history, North Korea is the product of the Soviet Union. And today Russia is also on the side of the communist regime of North Korea.

This is also blatantly false. Trying to prevent nuclear war is not the same thing as taking sides, Alik.

In October 2006 Russia supported United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 condemning North Korea's nuclear test.

After North Korea detonated another nuclear weapon on 25 May 2009 the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a sharp note of condemnation; The statement called the test a "violation" of previous Security Council resolutions and a "serious blow" to the nuclear nonproliferation regime. It also complained that “the latest DPRK moves are provoking an escalation of tension in Northeast Asia.”

North Korea under the third generation leader Kim Jong-Un continues to defy the international community in relation to its nuclear and rocket programme. It has recently advised foreign embassies that the North Korean government could not guarantee their safety in an event of conflict and advised the foreign embassies to reconsider their evacuation plans.

On March 2016, following the January 2016 North Korean nuclear test, Russia supported a U.N. Security Council resolution regarding the introduction of further sanctions against North Korea. Russian presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov said "the Kremlin is concerned over North Korea’s statements about its readiness to use nuclear forces and urges all states to display restraint", in response to Kim Jong-un's orders to the military to deploy the nuclear warheads so they can be fired at "any moment" and be prepared to launch preemptive attacks against its enemies.

If you remember the story that the Soviet Union had a hand not only to the creation of North Korea. There were a lot of socialist countries which was funded and managed by CCCP. This has led to the impoverishment of these countries and the disintegration of the USSR. I hope Russia will be no exception and will repeat the fate of the Soviet Union.

What about those millions of ethnic Russians who were sent to gulag during the 1930s? It was the Russians who suffered the most under the rule of Stalin. On the other hand, he favored the Muslims such as Azeris and Uzbecs.

Any historical document that is now declassified does not bear the truth. Therefore, it is very difficult to reconstruct the events that really happened at that time. But I have no doubt that the Russian government has committed several times the genocide against its people. I do not understand why

In that case, why should other peoples suffer in such a crazy country like Russia?

http://www.azerimosobl.ru/sites/default/files/gallery/denzashita2016-8949.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99Vzdy0V7Po

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3TxmXqsAd0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d24yM_5Rw_g (IN Russian)

Who is suffering in Russia?

http://www.azerimosobl.ru/var/images/khimki_stabilnost02.jpg.jpg

Azerbaijans for Putin. (http://www.azerimosobl.ru/content/%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD) (In Russian)

I don't like Russia at all, but i think USA is the most agressive country. Sorry pal, but i study history.

History is first and foremost a series of facts that can not be hidden, and most importantly, the fact remains a fact and does not depend on the commentary. The Russian state is an empire with many nations, and as history knows, empires collapse and this process is a historical fact.

First of all, there was no Russian government at that time. The entire USSR, including Russia was ruled by the Communists. There was genocide against the citizens of the USSR (especially against ethnic Russians), but those were committed by the Communists. You can't blame the Russians for the crimes of the USSR.

It's all national intrest. Russia as a country is doing all within power to maintain it's relevance. In the face of imminent threats. It is not really Russia fault that it seeks to expand its territories. The inability of the United States and NATO led coalition to stop. Every great nation of the world has at one time or the other sought to expand its territories or influence. Russia is doing what it's has to do to remain great. United States of America and NATO on their part should do more to rein them in.

If Russia is not stopped in its aggressive intentions now, then it will be much harder and an example of this is Germany in the time of Hitler. The political revenge of Putin is no different from Hitler's revenge.

This is why some Azrbaijanis love to live in Russia.


Large-scale immigration of Azerbaijanis to Moscow  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijani_mafia)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlHboFOxago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EBULmoTc0g

https://youtu.be/WIHvsazgm9c?t=42s (In Russian)

But Mister Alik is a pure lunatic, he prefer not to talk about the real problems of his alldays living in Azerbaijan.

http://eburg.mk.ru/upload/entities/2017/02/15/articles/detailPicture/e3/b6/19/1a9408391_8264155.jpg

People is asking to Mr. Putin the protection from Azerbaijani Mafia. (http://eburg.mk.ru/articles/2017/02/15/stomatolog-iz-nizhnego-tagila-prosit-u-putina-pomoshhi-v-borbe-s-mafiey.html) (In Russian)

Why they let those criminals in Russia? Very irrational  :o

Russia is not the most aggressive country but there are some other countries that are more aggressive like USA etc.

Because the Russian politicians are on their payroll. Every year more than 100,000 youngsters die as a result of heroin addiction in Russia. And these Azeri subhumans have a monopoly on the heroin trade in Russia. During the last two and a half decades, they have caused the deaths of more than 3 million Russians (mostly youth).

I certainly appreciate your insistence on the justification of Russian, but everything should have a limit. What about the Russian genocide are you talking about? How expats can arrange a genocide of Russian? Lol. This is probably a feature of the Russian mentality. And now you deny its involvement in military conflicts against all of its neighbors.

If the Russians themselves, along with other peoples of the USSR carried out genocide, this does not mean that these other peoples should be dependent on the madness of the Russians.

Out of the 60 million people killed by Stalin, more than 75% were ethnic Russians and Ukrainians. Groups such as Azeris and Uzbeks were never targeted and they enjoyed full protection under Stalin.

Russia under Putin's shadow has over powered themself. If USA needs to fear anything other than ISLAM then it is Russia :)

What is this number?
"Victims" are not in the numbers of deads/killed.

Yes. These statements are all true. I also read about this. And as of now they are also one of the aggressive country. It was maybe because of their powerful politicians as well that they became like that.

Russia has never been an aggressive country and is not. She is only protected from all ill-wishers who are trying to destroy her. Islamic states or the USA are the most aggressive.

I think at this period russia is not the most aggresive country. There is no news that they conquered territory of other countries like china did in the philippines (west philippine sea).

And Ukraine and Georgia?

Victims doesn't only mean those who died in the gulags and the purges. I have also included those who died from the famines and warfare. Because even these deaths were indirectly caused by the dictatorship of Stalin.

commie bastards lol

True facts, but i still think USA is the most agressive country.

Well I could say that Russia is one of the most aggressive country , maybe because they know that they are powerful and having a advanced technology that will help them when it comes to a war . They bullied the small country for them to have some of the resources in that country .

No surprises there. The Americans have invaded or intervened in at least 70 third world nations (militarily) ever since the end of world war 2. No other country (including Russia) even comes remotely close.

I read some news that Russian government is covertly arming the taliban fighters.

According to us general russia is arming taliban fighter https://youtu.be/QbAOREEYtc8

Taliban fighters is armed with improved weaponry like Heavy Machine Gun, Sniper rifle, and the ubiquitous Kalashnikov assault rifles.

Russia will go to any abomination, just to harm the US.

Can you please define what is aggressive for you?

This is the Byzantine emperor so appointed?

I think russia is not an aggressive country, if I see in the news more aggressive north of korea in russia, let alone the end of north korea often do intercontinental missile experiment, so make world worries especially neighbor country north korea, hopefully in this world given peace And no more war

I really agree with you, Russia is not the most aggressive country today, maybe in the past Russia was very aggressive.
China is very aggressive nowadays, China's economic growth is very advanced and strong, China's politics is growing strongly to affect the Asian countries as well as major countries in the world.
China has embedded its nails in many countries, its economic and political power have an effect on the targeted country, little by little China is affecting the world economy to make a big profit for their country, and take the world by their power.

USA and UK are the most aggressive countries for sure. Check their borders and check where their army corps are. Wtf are they doing in out of their borders? Fucking bastard killers...

Russia is one of the most aggressive countries, but now it is possible after disintegration of the USSR severely limited. America imposes sanctions that will weaken the Russian economy even more and this will lead to the collapse of Putin's regime, but that does not mean that there will come a more peaceful ruler.

Yes, the mentality of the people does not change, but the disintegration of Russia will free many nations. And it is possible that when the Russian people can not sell the riches of other peoples as a result of the collapse of the Russian Empire, then it can be engaged in rational creative work, and not the production of weapons of war and death.

I do not think that Russia is the most aggressive country, there are many good people there. This government is too aggressive, which tries to earn as much money as possible.

Can you prove that your allegations are true? All governments else russian also get as much income as possible from their inhabitants not just russians who do that.

wow, define what is aggressive first, in my definition the most aggressive country in the world is united states where they always try to put their nose everywhere in this world.

Russian aggressiveness is an issue that is being actively imposed by western mass media. So before speaking about how aggressive Russia is, you should try to read some other sources of information with different from US and Europe opinion and try to analyze it yourself

Russia is agressive because the media shows that.
But there is some countries which are more agressive and violent. Like USA, France, Israël ...

The numbers speak for themselves. During the last 7 decades, Russia has invaded a single country (Afghanistan), and that too at the request of the elected government. On the other hand, the Americans have invaded more than 70 nations and are still having military bases in some of these nations (including Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Japan).

Russia is the most common country if we speak about war. Russia is a powerful country like america wherein Russia is a good country fighter if there is war. They have a nuclear weapon and powerful weapon that can be use if war will come. Many people will die if this happen so we should be ready in war anytime. It is okay to be an aggressive country to protect their nation but they should not harm innocent people.

Why you are taking only last 7 decades? Because you don't to mention countries occupied by Soviets.
And why having of military bases you calling as invasion if there are both sides agreement.
Ok, if we follow your logic that military bases abroad = occupation, it means that Russia occupied Belarus, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Moldova, Kyrgyztan and Syria, because they have their military bases here. And we shouldn't forget about annexed part of Georgia and Ukraine.

Show me such agreement for 10 US Bases in Syria.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUQl8nRAW5U

I dont belive anything. And I am sure that if there is a country in the world that stands out for its aggressiveness, it must be USA.

I think not russia is the most aggressive country today because the number aggressive country is north korea. Because the rocket missiles test.

For that moment Russia is not an agressive country ..Russia is trying to dispose of west oppression

I absolutely agree with this. Full military combat when it comes to war. The most aggressive country in the world.

Sry, im not a big fan of russian politics, but there are so many aggressors in the world. Its easy just to blame russia

I don't blame them. Why not? Because they are warm enough in summer to feel how nice a warm land is. But they are so cold in winter that they wish it would all go away. So, why not conquer warm lands so that they have someplace warm to go to in winter, while maintaining their family heritage for summer?

8)

I can think of a very long list of aggressive countries, including and not limited to:

USA
Russia
Israel
Iran
North Korea
Syria

The last time I checked, Russia was not occupying any of the nations in your list (Belarus, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Syria). A membership in the Eurasian Economic Union doesn't mean that they are under Russian occupation. If that was the case, then I could say that the EU member nations are under occupation by Germany.

Totally agree! Your content is real.

Secondly, Russia. Unfortunately, Russian imperialism has been slowly growing under Putin’s influence. Obviously we know about the rigged referendum in Crimea, but Russia took Chechnya, too, back in 2000. They’ve been helping out Assad in Syria, and, like North Korea, have invested valuable resources into the military rather than social issues.

Oh, double standarts... If NATO have military bases - it's occupation. But if Russia have military base abroad - everything is OK? I'm not saying anything about European Union, EAEU or CIS because it's not related to things which was said. At first, you talked about military bases but now you are changic topic to economical unions.

youre talking about which time modern or ancient time? i didnt get it though

Russia's influence outside their own national borders is pretty limited. But what about the United States? They are maintaining hundreds of military bases in every nook and corner of the world, and they have invaded countless third world nations ever since the end of world war 2.

yes, because russia is the biggest country in the world and has a sophisticated weapon and do not want to lose from other countries so that Russia is more aggressive because it wants to seize the position of super power which is currently owned by the united states. 8)

i didnt get that what the hell they get from aggression? rather they can keep calm and cause welfare of their own country only

I dont agree because nowadays Korea is still in no.1 position from the view of aggression -_-

yes i agreed with that Russia is the most aggressive country from the economy, war and trechnology.

Underestimating Pakistan? they are no way inferior to russia in this case because they are constantly disturbing indians

I do not think that. In my opinion, Russia is presenting a tough solution to issues related to national interests. It may be a concern for some countries with opposing ideologies. .
According to recent statements, recent action has also shown Putin's strong hold on foreign policy.

Are you Russian? It seems so common for Russians to do this. If they are ever criticized for doing something, they point their fingers are somebody else. They say, "But they did it too!" or "Well, look at them, they're worse." This is such childish behavior. I don't want to say that the US is made of angels, but how is what the US does a justification for what Russia does?

You say that Russia's influence is limited outside it's own borders. Well, this thread is originally about the fact that Russia keeps trying to move it's borders out.

Russia is a power nation, it may look aggressive but it's a nation not to be meddle with.
I also happen to think the most aggressive and unpredictable nation is North Korea,
they seem to look like they are always preparing for war. I think generally any nation
with a massive army and nuclear capabilities are considered aggressive if provoked.

You are right, Putin chose the path of revenge and wants to restore the empire within the borders of the Soviet Union. This is the goal of his life and this revanchism finds support among the Russian people, who have an imperial worldview.

united states didnt cared seizing they simply took over the financial system of the state, or placing a secret junta, in that state government..

you have still seen nothing, yet  8).

A lot of bullshit there really. Too much of mainstream media. The bias is beyond thick and even dripping. There are certain questions you need to ask. If you do proper research, you will find out that there is no greater aggressor than the USA. It's all just masked warfare. The US has destabilized more countries and economies since after the World War than any other. And the process is still ongoing. So, before you even throw statements around carelessly, at least verify them for once.

I think Afghanistan is the most aggressive, if not, why they were in war with both Russia and USA?

That's because both used Afghanistan for their own purposes. They needed reason to start war against each other which can't be liked neither by Afghanistan nor any other countries where the same could happen.

Damn, you're brainwashed hard...were you detained in Guantanamo?

You don't have to officially annex territory...you just have to overthrow local government you don't like
and appoint loyal dictator, like Saddam, Pinochet etc...USA did it 30+ times after WW2, mostly in
South and Central America, and in Middle East

Ohhhh what we gain after WW2? I'm from Poland and after war country is even smaller. We lose more on the east and gain less on the west.
Truly Poland is the biggest loser among winning camp

The four counts where Russia "moved it's borders out" (Transnistria, Apsua, South Osetia and Crimea) were for protecting Russian, Apsua and Osetin populations who asked for help, being attacked by NATO or NATO-aspiring nations parts of which they nearly became.
This has nothing to do with "revanchism", "revenge", "childish grievances" and so on.
Preventing ethnical cleansings is not revanchism.

2nd, only one of those regions became part of the Federation. I specifically omit Donbass, as Donbass is too divided to get this kind of help.
Donbass is at civil war with unelected government, receiving humanitarian help much the same as "rebels" in entire Middle East receive help of US. The situation with involvement in Donbass is exactly mirroring involvement of e.g. US in Syria, but without the tomahawks.

3rd, how is what US does is a justification? There is geopolitical balance.
Giving Crimea to NATO would be geopolitical catastrophe with a lot more repercussions, than taking it back into Russia.
Reluctantly, Russian government was forced to take Crimea.

I wonder what was the reason to put Israel 3rd here.
Israel is the only nation that managed to increase it's territory by almost 100% in 6 days.
They took also Sinai peninsula that would make that factor even greater, but then gave it back.
Neither US nor Russia attacked more than 5 countries simultaneously in recent history.
Also neither of them were directly perpetrating racially targeted genocide in the 2nd half of previous century.
With the exception maybe of Viet Nam.

Why is even Iran here? All it did it went to war with Iraq, because of anglo-saxon shenanigans.
North Korea did absolutely nothing. Syria only fought back to Israel. My impression the list is just composed
from what the person see on CNN, without any personal analysis.

Despite the high criminal level in the early stages of the Russian’s history, taking place immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when organized crime controlled more than 40.000 economic organizations, including governmental organizations. The state of current affairs has significantly changed. Today visiting Moscow, St. Petersburg or any other city in the rest part of the country (except some spots) is safe as in any other big capital in the rest of the world; although it’s worth following some basic safety rules. If you thinking to travel to the regions close to the Ukraine border, this is not recommended, because of the high level of risk and unstable situation in the region of Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov.

I'm my opinion USA is the most aggressive country. But countries can do nothing it. American media bombarded the world population with propaganda 24/7. And USA has the most powerful military in the World. Thus no one can criticize the USA. It is like the Emperor new cloth story. Every Leader that criticize would be painted evil, replace and killed even their only intention is helping their own people.

I suggest reading this book:

http://pages.rw/images/detailed/5/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit_Man.png


Short video that sums up the book:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37Dvt2EqXF4

Yes Russia is one of the most aggressive country in the world as it cannot withheld any king of tolerance at international level . If anything goes not in favour of Russia's decision it starts international pressure just to signify it's dominance at the global level . Also russia is the most intolerant to any king of attack which other country specifies on russia verbally .

Some blizzards possible during winter time, that can affect the traffic and delay the flights. So, be sure that your visa won’t expire and you possess enough money in order to prolong your stay in the country. In some very remote areas near the border with Mongolia and Kazakhstan, earthquakes are possible.

Without the Western banking elite based in the USA on Wallstreet, the rise of the USSR would have never even happened. They not only funded it but carefully cultivated it. This neither makes USA nor Russia "the bad guys", it makes us all hosts to the same parasite.

Agreed about North Korea. People in the Asia-Pacific region are under constant pressure caused by unpredictable behavior of NK.
For instance, at the beginning of the year Japan received the alarm that North Korea has launched the nuclear missile. This announcement was later declared wrong, but I can`t imagine what kind of stress this announcement produced considering WWII history of Japan.
After all, what you can expect from the country where 4-5% of the population is enlisted and more than 4 million people in reserve.

The situation in the world is now such that the United States, although imposing its will on the entire planet, has in fact subjugated Europe to itself. Resistance to this pressure is a natural process.
The annexation of the Crimea was caused by the threat of Ukraine joining NATO and the deployment of military bases in Crimea. By this time, Ukraine was seized by anti-Russian nationalists. And since the peninsula is a strategically incredibly important object, opening access to the trade routes of the Black Sea, it was necessary.
At the same time, the referendum was not rigged. The absolute majority of the inhabitants of Crimea are Russians, who were concerned about the anti-Russian policy of the new government of Ukraine and the destabilization of the economy due to the power change of power. Also, residents of Donbass are mostly Russians and the secession is caused by the nationalistic policy of the new government in relation to the Russian-speaking ones.

Your justification for the occupation of the Crimea is very similar to the justification by the Russians of the war with Finland for being located close to Leningad. With this logic, any country has the right, if it wishes, to start a war.

Actually, two completely unrelated events, and not similar in any way. Crimea was given as gift to Ukraine by Khrushcev, while Finland
was never part of Russia. Attack on Finland could be better compared with USA attack on texas, although USA actually achieved
goal and took Texas from Mexico forever

Crimea was donated to Ukraine because Crimea is not the original territory of Russia. For example, did he not give Ukraine any other territory? Secondly, the gift is a gift. This does not mean that the gift can be taken back.

There is no "gift of populace" notion in international law, neither there was in Soviet law.
Population are not slaves to be gifted. Officially, it was not a gift, it was illegal act, both from the point of view of USSR and of Russian Soviet Federative Republic and even of Ukrainian SSR.
And Sevastopol was not "gifted" around that time, it was "gifted" (illegally ceded) by Yeltsin.

Russia isn't aggressive country, but it has to defend its rights and borders

How can you call Russia agressor? The history of this country is full of wars, you are right. But did you think how people feel during this taugh time? German attacked Poland and Ukraine and only Russia could resist... Russia lost in this 2 world war more people than other countreis together. More than 20 million Russians. They saved YOU from fashists. But your media fool you and you do not know the truth. Americans think that they won in the 2nd world war, but it's not true. Russia did it.

It wasn't so simple, though...but Americans played it cleverly, pitted Germany on Russia, then helped Russia, all
for their profit, while bleeding both Russia and Germany...I hope new generation of Russia and Germany politicians are more smart


As someone said somewhere, in Battle for Berlin, Russians drove Studebaker trucks, Americans used Ford, and Germans used General Motors

To be completely correct, it was the Soviet Union. Apart from territory, modern Russia has very little in common with its predecessor.
It played the major role, but I think the USA did their important contribution as well: who knows how the history would`ve gone if Americans didn`t confront Japan on the Pacific front?
Don`t forget it wasn`t only Germany the other countries fought against, it was the Axis powers.

Do you have any idea what you wrote? Beginning to read the true history books of our world, and then say that someone has captured in this world.
What is shown on television today is not the slightest truth. Today show that Russia provoked the 2nd world war. How dare you do this to write! If would nor the USSR you would all executed in camps or destroyed under Hitler and fascist Germany!
I am sure everyone is tormented by greed and greed only because Russia has such large territories and such wealth - this is the main reason for discord.
Do not look into the GARDEN to another - count your hectares!
You would still remembered the adventures of Alexander the great or the Roman Empire!.
Better look at what is happening in the world today-the whole of Africa and the middle East is on Fire just because the United States and the whole of Europe are spreading chaos and disorder there funding terrorists.

While most of what you wrote is true, you can't disregard this:

https://i.redd.it/ib81w67gucax.jpg

German and Soviet officers shaking hands following the invasion of Poland

Wouldn't Germany be most aggressive country then? Even going at such lengths as attacking an ally, while having 3-front war already. That's what i would call excessive aggressiveness. Sure, some might say that USSR was preparing their own attack on western front, if Germany didn't strike first, but as I've read from historic documents, many Hitler's advisers advised him not to attack USSR in current circumstances. Yet, he was such an aggressive dude, that he could resist the urge to strike, and he did, and the history went as we know it. Nowadays Russia's aggressive posture is nothing more than a bravado really. There isn't any wars that happen on a global scale, and the one war that is happening, is economic one, and Russia's currently losing it.

Usually, travelers can be robbed or kidnapped while drinking in nightclubs or bars, after accepting the proposals of free food, drinks, or transportation from strangers. Don’t leave your food or beverages unattended. Kidnapping for political reasons is possible in the North Caucasus. At one time the tourists have been attacked.

There is North Caucasus in the USA? From your description sounds almost as dangerous as Chicago or Detroit

This sort of thing is not only limited to Russia but almost every tourist Hotspot in the world. The local citizens will always try one way or another to steal from the tourists. It’s not something new so don’t vilify the Russians because of that .

More aggressive than the USA?  ???
I don't think so. Yes, Putin is displayed as the bad guy and yes he is doing shady stuff, but so is everyone else. They just have a better image. Also without Russia there would be no counterpoint to the dominance of the States. No good if one global player has overwhelming power.

In general, it is ridiculous to consider Russia an aggressor. The largest country in the world has no global territorial claims. Russia did not join the Donbas, although local residents expected it and hoped for it.
There are no economic benefits, unlike the United States, for which any war anywhere is beneficial for the dollar.
Russia is under constant pressure of propoganda from the west. Not to mention the economic pressure.
Perhaps the tale of terrorism has already annoyed everyone and needs a new external opponent.
And China, though a great threat, but a bad goal. He is able to make the whole Western world an economic hell and leave them without pants very quickly.

Foreigners are usually scammed via dating websites. Once the relationship develops, the target is asked by their friend or prospective partner to transfer money to make the travel to the country of the victim’s origin possible. When the money has been obtained the relationship is usually terminated. On the streets be careful and avoid playing in different gambling games, as they always organized with malice prepense.

Russia is not an aggressive country. Those who claim that Russia is an aggressive country do not understand the true structure of the world. Russia is always forced only to defend itself.

I believe that the above applies only to the policies that are led by the heads of state.
But in no case, it is not necessary to transfer this negative attitude to the inhabitants of Russia, ordinary people. Believe me, they themselves have always been the victims of their rulers.
This is very sad. Now in Russia, too, not everyone agrees with the foreign policy of the authorities. Therefore, it is not necessary to transfer the negative to the whole nation. It is necessary to treat people humanly, despite the policy.

You have just found one, and one is better than Russia in aggression. That is the United States, this is the way to snatch wealth. In fact, the world itself is a country, but interests lead to division. The Russian economy is very bad now.

I share the same thoughts. Common people are not involved in the state decision making, and people at power aren`t always peaceful and ready to find compromises. This is evident in all superpowers, the USA and Russia always compete. I think it won`t be that long until China joins this confrontation considering its development rate.
I just cite one example: remember the World Cup 2018 in Russia, remember how hospitable people were despite all the propaganda and stereotypes about Russia being hostile. I think it`s really important for all of us to pay less attention to what politicians do and focus on common people - not all of us are susceptible to the state propaganda.

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

whats the difference between seizing and annexing countries, or replacing the banking cartels with one aligned to you?

the answer is = Zero the usa, takes over the financial systems of countries thats basically the same. for the leaderships that constantly cant create long term gains, the usa.

russia acts geographically different

you dont want a serious discussion here, you are either stupid or an agenda driven propagandists nothing else.

And why do not you like the agenda? What's wrong with the rocket "Falcon" successfully launched? Or do you not like the fact that the Falcon is a rocket for tourists, and Putin’s hypersonic rockets for murder?

a highly armed russia is a guarantee for the stability development and advancement of the societies in east asia, south asia and the middle east.

besides it was russia that was the enemy of lybias destruction not the us that bombed lybia for petrodollar security gain.

russia should start using its orthodox mission to be able to integrate and foreingers better into its economy. so russia grows better and faster again simily like the gulf states in the middle east.

russians themselves dont like their weapons, after all they crushed the soviet union because of the too many weapons. but their government knows that those are necessary. to achieve foreign policy goal and protect economic supply lines.

I think that despite all the assertions that are given of Russia, the fact of having troops in Venezuela, supposedly protecting it from the United States, is a total act of provocation, because Russia has no interest that the people of the people of Venezuela are well, but protect the interests of continuing to exploit a country rich in gold, precious metals and oil in exchange for giving security to a dictator who is at their mercy. It's like paying and giving yourself the change.

Russia seized another country and provided it with development and stability — this is the absurd finale of your words. All Eastern European countries have fled from the Russian guarantee of their stability and development.

didnt the usa recently bombed back into stone age lybia in order to free it from ghadaffi in order to maintain their petrodollar imperialism? well russia seeked to prevent that.

how would you like it if superpowers regularily bombed back your society just in order to keep their countries money printing kapitalists the richest superrich of the world?

lybia would have survived and kept its 40 years developed infrastructure, if russia would have been stronger and more imperial.

they have fled and then lost a large portion of their labour population to uk, which no uk is losing due to brexit.

collapse of soviet union was no countries leaving, it was just opportunists taking over power (so called transformation winners)

but russia is comming back, just look at hungary, victor orban once took over power with western lobbist groups then he became an anti western anti liberalist opponent of the EU

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

And now we all wish the Soviets had taken all of Europe so we could have kept the Muslims and the Africans out of Europe.

Azerbaijan, land of Muslim terrorism?

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/azerbaijan/terrorism

There were no terrorists in Azerbaijan when Russians kept peace and order there

In fact, America and Russia are very similar here.
They act in very similar way and protecting their political and economic interest around the world.
In the history Latin America usually way playing ground for America and Europe and Asia for Russia.
Great countries never allow small countries to run a completely independent policy.
Right now it seems that Venezuela is in conflict and one side wants to cooperate with America and other side with Russia.
It's battle for future influence and profit from oil.

I have a feeling that for the West and America rewritten the whole history and now in all textbooks and television Russia - the enemy number 1.
That everyone forgot about world war III? when Nazi Germany bombed the whole of Europe and only Russia was able to release all.
Forgot about Korea and America? forget Afghanistan?
God, what nonsense you're talking, Wake up and remember what happened before.
A single foot of earth over the past 100 years, Russia is not captured by the military, all the land that she inherited - the result of wrong policies of countries and referendums.
And all those who say that Russia is the aggressor No. 1 is just jealous of her vast territory!
Russia is a very good-natured country those who came to Russia for the world Cup just delighted and want to come here again.

In all Muslim countries of the former colonies of Russia there is no terrorism. It is the Russians who came up with the myth of terrorism, so that under this pretext they could bring in an army, supposedly to defend them against terrorism and retake them.
As for Azerbaijan, this country, having freed itself from Russia, is successfully developing and there is no Muslim terrorism there.

Lol, I linked UK government page and you blame Russia for that...how cute
If your government want you to spread propaganda here, tell them to find someone smart

thats not true, actually

the west abused their sea trade blockade, besides, socialism is comming back worldwide, especially in the usa, so dont think the cold war is over.

i also thought for a long time he is just a paid propaganda troll to spread anti russia hatred.

I’ve been paying a bill for propaganda tread to spread anti russia hatred.
thats not true, actually

the west abused their sea trade blockade, besides, socialism is comming back worldwide, especially
Report to moderator

Whom is the West abused by the sea blockade? Maybe call a country that was a colony of Russia, which fell under the naval blockade of the West? How does socialism return to the US if it has never been there? Socialism on the example of the USSR failed. All the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe have long since moved to a market economy. Where have you been that you missed important historical events?

the west has become effectively communist due to crypto, look at the western governments today they are effectively all communist. and their infrastructure is getting wasted by cryptocurrencies like bitcoin

including bankingcartel capitalist china.

The poor West, it awaits the fate of the USSR.

not just the west, crypto will put wast regions of the world into defining themselves as communists. to protect their power

Communism is stateless society...so either whole world is communist, or noone is
Communism as dictatorship is just western propaganda (pretty successful, I must add)

not just the west, crypto regions of the world to defining themselves as communists. to protect their power
Communism is a stateless society ...
Communism as dictatorship (pretty successful, I must add)

  Understood nothing. That communism in the USSR really had nothing to do with dictatorship? But what about Lenin’s words about the dictatorship of the proletariat?

no communism is when people in power (financial system) legitimice themselves with a communal mission,

the EU and the USA under TRUMP (put america first) are true communists.

what is a democracy when it is devoured by capitalist or the banks (financial system)

I, as a resident of Russia, find it funny to read such statements about Russia.
Firstly, what happened during the USSR could not be applied to contemporary Russia.
It is like hating today's Germans because of what Hitler did.
Secondly read the meaning of the word reparation.
And finally unlike the USA, Russia does not interfere in the internal politics of other countries.

Yes, Russia does not interfere in the policies of other countries, it captures them.

Russia let Azerbaijan go, USA still didn't give back California, Texas and whatever else it took from Mexico

Don't all big nations conquer other nations?

Russia did not let go, Azerbaijan as well as Russia was part of the USSR. However, the USSR collapsed and Russia together with Azerbaijan and more with many other republics became independent states.

Mindblowing logic, lol

its not that easy, its people in those neighbouring countries and their trade and social networks that are asking for reintegration, in order to improve their businesses and societies or like in the case of the middle eastern neigbours to be protected from neigbours or destructive regime changes.

Right! Aggression and stupidity can go hand in hand.    8)

It's always funny to read Alik Bahshi's statements in both russian and english. However, any sane person will come to conclusion that his employer is either stupid or just have stolen nearly all money, which were dedicated to funding the propaganda. Giving a level of Azeri corruption into account, the second option seems more believable.

jes these payed propaganda trolls are all trash, only the russian ones work, that threw the drunken brits into brexit apocalypse, they dont act that stupid. they act inteligent.

@ali

the russians dont volunatrily spend so much money for weapons in fact they hate doing that.

And what then do the Russians do? And where is this fact?

That's great! From the topic of Russia as a state of conquest, the Putin troll turned to corruption in Azerbaijan. My opponent has no arguments to refute my topic, and therefore begins to discuss in another area. Dear, if you want to talk about corruption in Azerbaijan, then open the topic, I will be pleased to get acquainted with it. And here is the topic of Russia as an aggressor.

Its simple to refute...USA is most aggressive by far. fact that it's occupying about 50% of globe but did not officially annexed it means nothing...its far
cheaper to rule and exploit other countries when they think they're free, but Germany or Japan are far from free, so lets not even start with arab countries,
or whole South America or Africa

I wonder why no one is talking about Japan. Japan has killed form 3 kk to 10kk people in China in 1937. In 1937, the Osaka Mainichi Shimbun and its sister newspaper, the Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shimbun, covered a contest between two Japanese officers, Toshiaki Mukai and Tsuyoshi Noda of the Japanese 16th Division. The two men were described as vying to be the first to kill 100 people with a sword before the capture of Nanjing. From Jurong to Tangshan (two cities in Jiangshu Province, China), Mukai had killed 89 people while Noda had killed 78 people. The contest continued because neither had killed 100 people. By the time they had arrived at Zijin Mountain, Noda had killed 105 people while Mukai had killed 106 people. Both officers supposedly surpassed their goal during the heat of battle, making it impossible to determine which officer had actually won the contest. Therefore, according to journalists Asami Kazuo and Suzuki Jiro, writing in the Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shimbun of December 13, they decided to begin another contest to kill 150 people.[49] After the surrender of Japan in 1945, Mukai and Noda were both arrested and tried as war criminals, and both of them were found guilty and executed by shooting_{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre}.

I can't believe why some people can even compare Putin to Hitler. It is fact that Putin is good manipulator and it is not afraid to use power even if it is meant to kill someone, but it usually end on one or few deaths, not whole race!!!! Nowadays I would say that USA is most aggressive country you won't see it on TV or news cuz everything is carefully hidden behind democracy or Humanitarian aid.

  I looked at the map in Russian sources and did not see that America occupies an area of 50% of the globe. But the fact that the Crimea now became belong to Russia is drawn on the map. So who to trust you, or the map?

Thats because you're simpleton and don't understand that you don't have to formally annex something to own it

You only need military base presence, like for example Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo, and compliant "democratically" elected
government..."democratically"  is in quotation marks because for USA that means that government is compliant to
USA (Pinochet), and not to their own population (Assad)

You see, I, as you write a simpleton, based on facts, and not on conjectures like you. The card I gave as evidence is a fact. America did not annex, for example, Germany or Poland, despite the fact that there are military bases there.

Yes, I knew you will not understand

western media constantly complain about russian trolls and internet interference, so it must work, like in the case of brexit that effectively crippled uk as a democracy. and a society.

russia isnt aggressive the russians simply sacrifice a big part of their economy for security, compared with the usa, the russians dont have a big military budget actually you should rather complain about the usa.

there are much worse and much more aggressive societies than russians,

to russia you can safley travel through and visit it if you have the money, but compare that with waziristan pakistan tribal areas or certain tribal war zones in africa, its basically a no go area, the people dont have just a big military budget there they live like some form of zergisch subhuman savages. with low life expectancy.

I agree. Seems more like a propaganda for me. That title should be a toss between the us and china. Though i understand that this thread was started 2 years ago but even then, the us has been more aggressive. By far. Putin is a smart man and won't gamble being tagged as aggressive though he won't be pushed around as well that's for sure.

A clever leader would not make his country an outcast. The mere fact that the dictator Asad and Maduro, who led his country to poverty, are the friends of Russia, speaks of the great way you say Putin’s mind.

i think the outcast lies that is comming from the banking cartel from the west is a card house that is collapsing, look at uk and brexit thats real outcast selfcripplement and shot into the foot. if russia would be open it would be same shit like india with its bad neigbourhood. russia is honest its not constantly stealing workforce and experts from others. it tries to work with what it has and isnt constantly stealing like uk (rumanian and eastern european labour).

While I'm no fan of the current Russian government, it is a bit unfair to say that Russia was not one of the winners from world war 2. They are aggressive but I would say it is more of a power play by Putin to retain and consolidate his grip on power. You can only hope that people who decide to creep around in the shadows will get buried there.

I believe it would be unfair to single out Russia as the most aggressive country in the world. It is some sort of negative propaganda. Many Western Powers are also covertly involved in killings, assassinations, bombings and bringing down the governments all over the world to promote their financial and strategic interests.

China doesn't meddle outside its immediate neighborhood, so I would say that the US is the most aggressive country in the world right now. They have been occupying parts of Germany and Japan ever since the WW2 (Russia ended its occupation soon after the war). And in Japan, there have been widespread protests against the continuing American military presence. The behavior of the American soldiers does not help the matter either. There were multiple incidents recently, when the American servicemen tried to sexually assault under-age Japanese children.

soviet union is returning anyway, however much more hedonistic and less efficent for third world countries

neocommunism -> (EU) + (FED) zentral bank regions fighting for their survival

America, annually kills more than 100 thousand children, 250 women and 500 thousand men, And here Russia ?

The massive invasion of the Russian army along the entire border with Ukraine characterizes Russia as an aggressive country. All democratic countries are united in their desire to help the Ukrainian people in the struggle for their freedom and their future.

I will be brief - take the trouble to give the facts. True, not from sources such as terrorist forums or Russian media (which is essentially the same thing), but from open and trustworthy?
If they are not, then add to your post "I think so, but why exactly - I did not come up with" :)


and for study, I will give the FACTS about how many warriors against OTHER peoples Russia STARTED. Took from the 20th century to today. Let's evaluate "peace-loving Russia"

XX century:
-Suppression of the Ihetuan civil uprising in China by the Russian temples, which eventually turned into a war (1899-1901)
- The aggression of Soviet Russia against the UNR and the liquidation of independent Ukraine (1918-1920)
-Civil War in Spain (USSR intervention on the side of the government) (1936-1939)
-Occupation of part of Poland (partition of Poland together with the Nazis, annexation of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus) (1939)
-Annexation of the Baltic countries, not recognized in the world until the collapse of the USSR (1939, 1941-1944)
-Soviet-Finnish war, annexation of Karelia and Southern Finland (1939-1940)
-Soviet-Ukrainian war (against UPA) (1941-1953)
-Soviet occupation of the countries of Eastern Europe and East Germany (creation of puppet pro-Soviet governments), annexation of Koenigsberg (now Kaliningrad) (1945)
-Soviet-Japanese war, annexation of the Kuriles (1945)
-Korean War (unofficial "hybrid" war waged by the USSR), creation of a puppet North Korea (1950-1953)
-The same "hybrid" participation of the USSR in the Vietnam War (1957-1975)
-Military suppression of the uprising in Hungary by the troops of the USSR (1956)
-Intervention of the USSR troops in Czechoslovakia, military suppression of the "Prague Spring" (1968)
-Arab-Israeli war ("hybrid" participation of the USSR on the side of the Arabs) (1967-1973)
-Another "hybrid" participation of the USSR / RF in the civil war in Angola (1975-2002)
-War for the Ogaden ("hybrid" participation of the USSR) (1977-1978)
-The Afghan war began with the overthrow of the legal government by the USSR special forces and the assassination of the President of Afghanistan and further full-scale military intervention (1979-1989)
- Transnistrian conflict with Moldova with the participation of the 14th Army of the Russian Federation and Russian "Cossacks", the formation of an unrecognized puppet enclave "PMR" (1992)
-First Chechen War (1994)
-Second Chechen War (1999)

XXI Century:
- War against Georgia, formation of unrecognized puppet enclaves of South Ossetia and Abkhazia (2008)
- Illegal and unrecognized by the world annexation of Crimea with the help of the military of the Russian Black Sea Fleet and special forces of the GRU General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (2014)
- "Hybrid" war in Donbass, formation of unrecognized puppet enclaves "DPR" and "LPR" (from 2014 to the present)
- Military operation in Syria (Russian intervention on the side of the government) (from 2015 to the present).
- Global military invasion of Ukraine (February 2022)

And this is without taking into account other local conflicts, where Russia acted as the instigator of the problem, the provocateur of the parties, the murderer (hiding behind the classic theme "it's not us").

I hope the war between Russia and Ukraine will be her last war.

This article says what we all feared. Russia is going to shut the gas off. But why? Is it because Russia is mean and bad? If Russia were mean and bad, they wouldn't have start the gas flowing in the first place.

So, why is Russia shutting off the gas? Because she is sick and tired of people from the outside messing in her domestic affairs regarding Ukraine. Ukraine needed to be spanked for what she was doing to Russia. And Russia simply stepped up to the plate and started the spanking.

Then all these other nations jumped in. So, why should Russia supply them with her products? They asked to be enemies. Give them what they asked for. Shut off the gas.

But here's the real gasser. Russia can't get parts because of the sanctions. Poor little Russia. Everybody is against her... LOL.


Gazprom Declares Force Majeure, Will Halt Gas Flows To Germany Indefinitely (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/328882-2022-07-18-gazprom-declares-force-majeure-will-halt-gas-flows-to-germany.htm)




8)

This is extremely short-sided. Russia has been extremely aggressive since it gained some momentum in the late 1800 or so, but prior to their aggressions, other countries like Spain, Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US for example have all displayed agressive tendencies and actions, and to think that the Russian aggression is in a bubble and not connected to prior aggression is just not correct. Everything needs to be viewed in the context of historical evidence, and unfortunately, Russia is just one in the long line of aggressive empires and is really not the only one right now.

Russia is the most aggressive country


... next to the Ukraine. The difference is the way they are aggressive. Russia is out-in-the-open aggressive, honestly aggressive. The Ukraine tries to hide their aggressiveness by sneaking it in through a back door, just to make Russia look bad.



8)

I want my grandchildren to ask me - "grandfather, what kind of word was "Russia"? What is it? Was it exactly?" :)

A couple of questions:
- where will Russia put all the gas planned for sale to the EU?
- For how many kopecks will it sell all this gas to China?
- ... and when China gets tired of joking over Russia, how much will Russia pay China to take this gas?
- When the training program "Do like Russia" comes out, about how not to do it if you don't want to look like an idiot? :)

If the other two questions ever happen, they won't happen within the lifetime of your family line.

8)

Europe is looking for alternative ways to replace Russian gas. A promising option could be gas from the Caspian Basin. On this occasion, negotiations between the EU and Azerbaijan have already taken place.

If the other two questions ever happen, they won't happen within the lifetime of your family line.

8)
[/quote]

And you are funny  ;D ;D ;D

start counting - no more than 700 days before this event, probably even earlier! Take a screenshot - if none of the events happen - I will apologize to you in front of everyone, and I admit that I underestimated your qualities as a seer and analyst :) Well, or you will have to make a similar speech in an appeal to me :)


PS "Ask Putin." - I will not, this is the most deceitful and vile creature on the planet. It lies always and everywhere, with or without reason. A lie is like air for him... Maybe even more is needed :)

You seem to have figured one thing out correctly. And you are practicing it quite well. It isn't countries that are aggressive. It's people.

8)

Here I absolutely agree with you!
I have been explaining to people for a long time that not one Putin, a geek and scum is to blame for everything that happens! He is just a collective image - Russian values ​​and desires. Therefore, there is no "only guilty Putin", there is a whole nation of terrorists and murderers who, having enormous resources, have not been able to learn how to create something for life, but only with all their might, due to backwardness and anger, are trying to prevent everyone around them from living fine ! Here you are absolutely right, it's nice to see that in Russia there are still more or less sane people who objectively assess the situation! I will give you an example! :)

Ask whole South America how they like aмepикaнcкий миp

for ukraine may say yes russia is aggressive but they are not the only aggressive country but the death and destruction they cause say yes because this is a war which is considered aggressive as it is stronger in every way.
and many strong states act aggressively against weaker states, and violence is necessary to end wars with violence.
both were wrong, the west violated the warsaw pact so russia was stabbed in the back then russia became paranoid. So the cause of the war is the paranoia of Russia and the greedy west by stabbing Russia in the back, also the Ukrainian president is wrong if he doesn't choose the west there will be peace, there is no right or wrong in war.

  Nobody destroyed the Warsaw Pact. The practice collapsed as a result of the voluntary withdrawal from it of all the countries that made it up. The basis of the pact was the ideology of Communism, which turned out to be a mistake. Democracy defeated communist totalitarianism without firing a shot, and there is no reason to blame the West for this.

    And what is the fault of the President of Ukraine Zelensky? Is it that he organized the fight against the aggressor for the independence of his country in his direct duty? Putin's goal is to destroy Ukrainians as a people. Putin said that Ukrainians are actually Russians and there is no Ukrainian people. As I see it, you support Putin's aggression against the Ukrainian people. There is no other conclusion to your post.

Zelensky's fault in sabotaging the Minsk agreements. There was nothing humiliating for Ukraine in them - the inhabitants of Donbass wanted only a little autonomy and the right to speak their native language freely. By sabotaging the Minsk agreements, Zelensky not only dragged Ukraine into an armed conflict with Russia (although he came to power on promises to end the war), but also lost, in addition to Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions (and most likely will also lose Mykolaiv, Kharkiv and Odessa regions).

  Russian troops entered the territory of Ukraine without any rights. Understanding this, Putin called the Russian soldiers little green men. All Putin's actions are lies. There was no ban on the Russian language in Ukraine. This is Putin's false pretext to bring in the Russian army. Why didn’t he send an army, for example, to Latvia, because there the percentage of Russians was higher than in Ukraine. The thing is that Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania acted smarter, they immediately applied to join NATO, otherwise the little green men would have ended up there under the pretext of infringing on the Russian language. I was in Latvia and Lithuania, I spoke Russian calmly, no one stopped me or threatened me. This is a lie of Putin, however, as in everything. Putin wants to restore the empire within the borders of the USSR, there is no other reason for Russia's aggressive actions. And most importantly, the Russian people, with their great-power outlook, support Putin.

The Baltics are next in line for denazification.

And Trump is going to win in 2024, and denazify the US.

8)

And then Poland, Finland, UK, later US and half of world basically and then everywhere will be Russkiy mir.

Why he didn't ''denazified'' while he was presidentin 2017-2021?

Trump was a businessman, not a politician. Now he has learned politics.

8)

 That's when he learns, then he puts forward his candidacy for president.

Come on guys, Russia is definitely not the most aggressive country

  A cry of helplessness.

The truth is that Russia has been a powerful country and will always want to challenge any country that crosses their boundaries.
 What also makes Russia to be very powerful is that Russia does not depend on any country in anything.  Russia is a great a country because some country look up to them.

  And what country crosses the borders of Russia?

For me I don't think Russia is just being aggressive. The truth is that every country of the world tries as much as possible to protect her interest.

This is just international politics playing out. Each country has her own allies who would support their activities wether wrong or right. Russia is just doing the same thing any other world powerful country would do; protecting her territory.

https://i0.wp.com/pbs.twimg.com/media/DOSxG9aW0AEQLas.jpg:large?resize=650,400


Find Russians!

  I would be very grateful if you indicate who attacked Russia?

Anybody from any country who travels abroad, essentially takes a little of his country with him. He might agree with certain "things" from the place to which he is traveling, but he still is his country.

How much more when families that include Russians live in Ukraine because of mixed relations of the past. And when the Ukraine attacks these Russians out of the blue like they have been in Donbas for the last 8 years, they are really attacking Russia.

8)

 Firstly, no one attacked Russians in Ukraine. I have Russian friends in Chernivtsi who told me that this is Putin's lie, and everyone knows that Putin is a well-known deceiver. Secondly, if, for example, in France someone attacks a Russian, that Russia will invade France because of this?

And you believed your Russian, lying friends. Seems like you like to believe lies from Russia.

     8)

Is not talking in the context of people but the way the government of Russia had tried to enforce his presence in his territory, if you can read the text he related it to previous government even before the Soviet Union.

Let me decide what kind of friends I have. And they are not from Russia, but from Ukraine. As for lies, here on the forum there is my topic "The Empire of Lies and its main liar" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5408234.0
 

Everything goes to the fact that this bastard formation in the form of Muscovy under the stage name "Russia", like a cancerous tumor on the body of the world, poisoning the whole world with its toxicity and rashism, will soon be removed !!!
What happened yesterday is not what I expected and announced a week ago, but it also turned out very nicely. Glory to Ukraine ! Glory to the APU!
But very soon you will still see what I informed about earlier, believe me, it will be very cool! :)

It can indeed be considered the most aggressive country if we take into consideration the economic sanctions that have catastrophic repercussions on the global economy. Its effects are catastrophic.

In this opinion, the issue of aggression in relation to wars is completely eliminated, because all colonial states are aggressive to similar degrees. When I think of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, I find no one comparable to the aggressiveness of the United States. But, of course, I cannot forget what Japan did in the East Asian countries that it colonized or Nazi Germany and the art of torture it invented in its prisons.

I couldn't decide for you which friends you have, because you are so hung up on lies that you don't have any. Which of your acquaintances are feeding you lies, and which aren't? How do you know? And how do you know when they are the worst of liars, the kind who only lie to you some of the time, but seem friendly the rest of the time.

You are so bitter in your lies that you are losing your masculinity. Or did you write in your profile that you are a woman. I haven't checked. But you sure sound like one the more we go on.

If Russia and its people were liars, they would have been destroyed long ago. Why? Because when you know that all your people are liars so that you can't trust them, and when you are one yourself, you split up to avoid being hurt by each other.

The fact that Russia has some of the top-notch nukes in the world. The fact that they trust each other with them, shows that they are not liars. Since you are their enemy, why wouldn't they use lies with you if it means overcoming their enemy?

8)

  A good example of an ideological defender of the Empire of Lies, where logic and common sense are without connection and scatter like galaxies in the universe.

I think Russia's aggression in Ukraine will be its last war.

No defense of Russia intended. These are simply facts. Russia is powerful enough that its  last war might just be when it takes over the world.

8)

The fact is that world's most powerful countries always want to remain powerful and fearful. Non wants to be intimidated or sidelined. I still believe that any of the World's most powerful countries would still do almost the same thing being done by Russia.

I think the facts are talking about the opposite. For example, America had every opportunity to destroy Russia in 1990, but it is not an aggressive country, it does not need foreign land, unlike Russia.

Russia and the US agreed that Russia would dissolve the USSR if the US backed off regarding NATO... all for the goal of world peace. Russia did its part of the agreement, but the US did just the opposite. The US will have to pay for its lying and cheating. Just because we don't see a USSR any longer, doesn't mean Russia lost any of its former power. All it means is that the power has been consolidated to a smaller area, the Russian mainland. From there it can be used more effectively by Putin against anybody, including the US.

8)

You are generally far from reality. The only question is whether you don't know or you're lying. When did the US promise to disband NATO or retreat? What president or who else said such words? Give a link, but not to the famous liar Putin. Russia was unable to stop the collapse of the Warsaw bloc, lost in the Cold War and collapsed, and this without the military participation of NATO.

This is funny. You want a link, while the only links YOU give, are links to other link-less things you have written. Take a look at real history sometime.

8)

First, I refer to my articles so as not to repeat myself and to prevent the reader from asking questions in advance that he may have. Secondly, I always rely on known facts and do not turn to religion like you when you are at a loss as an opponent.

Really? And how it would do that?

What to do?

8)

it is true and deserves to be dubbed in the russian state,
because I recently read the news about the Russia-Ukraine war
it says the crimes of the russian army invaded ukraine,
what i read,
Russian soldiers opened fire on churches, killed New York journalists, killed people with disabilities, attacked civilians, and fired artillery at schools.

The atrocities of Russian soldiers are documented by journalists, and for these crimes Putin and those involved in these crimes will answer before the tribunal, as well as for the downed Malaysian plane with passengers. They will be hanged in the same way as the German Nazis were hanged.

Anybody can see what a troll you are. All they need do is look at your website(s) and other forum writings. Almost all of it is your blab. References are your own writings rather than examples from somewhere else. You are approximately all hot air talk.

---

All this is exactly what the whole US and Ukraine are doing in Ukraine. Take a little time out to find the rest of the story.

However, thank you for posting the way you do. It will help people who want to know the truth to want to investigate the rest of the story. It helps me to point out the rest of the story.

8)

Apart from all these you have mentioned, you know that Russia need to calm down and deal in the safest and better way to make sure that the world do not become a world zone. There's is need for Putin to try his best and ensure a safe zone for the Ukrainians so that this world can end amicable without more fights and conflict between the two countries.

Russia is in a life and death struggle to defend herself against the US, who is attacking her through Ukraine.

You might be a kind of person who would allow an attacker to mug you and steal your property. There are many other people who would not be like that.

Russia has decided to fight to protect herself... rather than simply rolling over and letting the US kill her and steal all her property.

8)

Why did Ukraine attack Russia? It seems to me that you clearly do not perceive reality.

Azerbaijan is worse, when you look at genocide against Armenians

Ukraine attacked Russia starting 2014, because she was prompted to by the US, and because she is as aggressive as Russia.

People in that whole area of the world seem to be so aggressive that they don't care if they die or not. All they want to do is fight. You prove it by constantly expressing that Russia is bad. You want to fight, because you are aggressive. You simply don't have enough money to do it in a REAL way. So, you blab, trying to make Russia look far worse than she is.

Consider what Branko says, above. You jokers in that whole region of the world love to fight. When are you going to forget the past, and learn to live with your neighbors and neighboring countries in peace... and without slandering them all the time?

8)

The eloquent message of the tsarist general A.P. testifies to the aggressive nature of Russia. Yermolov to Alexander - in 1819 during military operations in the Caucasus: “I made a march into the mountains, taking advantage of the general horror and flight, destroyed several villages, all the grain in the fields and did not meet a single person on the way; the enemy has dispersed to such an extent.” In the same place: “It was ordered to exterminate the villages, and, by the way, the most beautiful town of up to 800 houses, called Ulu-Aya, was ruined. From here, the inhabitants fled with such haste that they left several infants behind. The devastation was necessary as a monument to the punishment of a proud and hitherto unsubmissive people; it is necessary for the edification of other peoples, on whom some examples of horror are convenient to impose a curb.” (Notes of A.P. Yermolov, during the administration of Georgia).

  Judging by the cruelty with which Russia destroys Ukrainian cities, it shows that over the past 200 years Russia has not changed at all, remaining an aggressive country.

Even Americans blame Azerbaijan

https://www.npr.org/2022/09/19/1123515328/armenia-azerbaijan-nagorno-karabakh-explained

"Nancy Pelosi and several other U.S. lawmakers arrived in Armenia. Pelosi blamed Azerbaijan for "illegal attacks" on Armenia"

When Russia wasn't fighting Ukraine and had peacekeepers between Armenia and Azerbaijan , Azerbaijan and Armenia were at peace

Nancy Pelosi is supported by the Armenian lobby in California, so she is against Azerbaijan. Moreover, she does not know the true history, and knows it only at the suggestion of the Armenians.

Loads of Zelensky messages show that the Ukraine wants to turn the fight into an attack that overthrows Russia. If he did that, would he stop there? Of course not! He'd simply take up the conquering of nations around the world.

The problem isn't Russia or Putin. The problem is that ALL you jokers in that part of the world want to fight. Your theme is: "Fighting gives life meaning!"

You prove that you are from that part of the world and that you want to fight as much as they do. It's in your aggression against Russia, right in your writing. If we could easily get into Russian news from Russia, we could find a bunch that say the same things as you do, but against Ukraine. You are simply a verbal warmonger... because you don't have enough strength to get out there and literally fight.

8)

I marvel and bow before your providence. You are right, Zelensky, after defeating Russia, will begin to conquer other peoples. Probably first the European peoples, then it will spread to .... Maybe you can tell us in what sequence Ukraine's aggression will be directed. Thank you. I look forward to your clarification. I think you should warn loudly what awaits the peoples if they all together do not repulse Ukraine and rally with Russia, which alone is trying to stop the aggressor who attacked Russia.

If Russia is aggressive - so is India and USA and China
all the powerful countries are killing and damaging the people and the infrastructure at the cost of peace and this will affect lots of people and generation for ages

You are right, any war is bad. But Putin started this war and sows death on Ukrainian soil. What do you propose to do in this case?

Putin had shown the world that he do not tolerate any nonsense which is very obvious that the way is presented it looks very surprising and regrettable even to the Russian soldiers. Nobody likes war and people had learnt from the world war 1 and world war 2 that there is no  need for us to fight ourselves. It is better to resolve any issue that will bring war than we trying to fight and kill ourselves.

The funny thing is that in the US, the people who want the war to continue, often suggest that those who want peace should move to Russia.


Always Opposing The Last War But Not The Current One:  (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/334526-2022-10-25-always-opposing-the-last-war-but-not-the-current-one.htm)




8)

And how do you propose to solve the problem? So Putin decided that it was the war that was needed to seize Ukraine.

If Biden communicates with the American people on the open lawn in front of the White House, then the bandit Putin, demonstrating his cowardice, communicates exclusively from the bunker and on television. He even holds meetings with his ministers on television.

USA has offered 26 million of aid to the Ukraine and along with that they have also been giving with arms and ammunitions.
EU is already in trouble because they went against Russia - now winter is arriving and they have no gas supply

There is lot of wrong information in your post. I'm not sure from where you took these 26 millions. USA aid for Ukraine, including arms is worth of billions.
And from your post it looks like Europe will freeze to death without Russian gas. Europe don't have shortage of gas, they found alternative suppliers like Azerbaijan, USA, Qatar, only price is question. Main problem that Europe were happy to suck Russian gas pipe and become heavy dependable on it and they didn't saw any reasons to have alternatives for it.

The impudence in their aggressiveness was brought to the point of absurdity by the Russians. So the attack of Ukrainian drones on Russian warships, which fire missiles at Ukrainian cities, was called a terrorist attack by the Russians. And the fact that Russian missiles are killing civilians and destroying homes is a good thing.

But it is the Ukraine military that was doing this against both Russians and Ukrainians since 2014. All Russia is doing is trying to stop the Ukrainian madness, which madness is being supported by the US.

The fact that Russia is against harming civilians is shown by their moving civilians across the Dnieper River in Crimea, so that they wouldn't be harmed by the Ukraine military... that doesn't care who they hurt.

The fact that the US is supporting the Ukraine, ultimately for US purposes, shows that the US is far more aggressive than Russia. And to show the Ukraine madness, read below.


Biden Lost Temper In Zelensky Phone Call: "Show A Little More Gratitude" (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/334910-2022-10-31-biden-lost-temper-in-zelensky-phone-call-show-a-little.htm)




8)

This nonsense is not commented. This user is exactly a copy of Putin on the forum.

And you're copy of Poroshenko on a forum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHWHqj8g7Bk

This is much better than being a copy of Putin's tyrant.

So you're OK if president of some country threatens part of country
kids will have to live in basements because of shelling? How are
you better than Putin, then?

Understood nothing! Which President? Whose President? Could you be specific?

I was very specific

You were very vague. Poroshenko respects democracy.  Compared to Putin he's a saint. Although...compared to Putin most humans are saints.

"president of some country threatens part of country"



Huh?

If you aren't paid Russian troll, you should ask for money from Kremlin. Because otherwise you are just working them for free (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot). Maybe you'll get a medal from Putin.

Most of Russian trolls here in Finland are easy to spot as you, i am not sure why as they could do way better job hiding their agenda. But i am not complaining as when they are acting like mental patients they are not doing any harm.

But anyway... As a Finn, our education system has done a good job teaching media criticism in public shool and making us resistant for Russian propaganda in general. Most of us can see it from miles away as we have long history with it. We have been in information war against them since CCCP and while Russia has been using every leverage they can, their resources seem now to have depleted for the war in ukraine. There are occasional reddit and some attacks but that's mainly it.

In fact the whole illegal attack to Ukraine seem to have unified the whole Finland, lot's of peaceful hippies are regretting that they did choose civilian service instead of military service in during mandatory national conscription. People seem to have more focused of getting rid of polarisation and fake news. And while most of Finland didn't want to join into NATO just while ago, the whole attitude changed immediately after invasion.

I changed my mind that day. There wasn't really even an option for me. Putin was unhinged and just too dangerous. Not to mention the weird conservative values he holds dear.

Living next to Russia makes us scared, and things have never been this intense since our winter war (*edit* Continuation War). What scares me most is that i can't see any other way out of from this then change in leadership in Russia. In that way they either get even crazier leader or point the blame to crazy putin. There are not going to be peace with Putin, that's for sure.

Too bad they only taught you about Russian propaganda in school, so you completely fell victim to USA propaganda

https://images.csmonitor.com/csm/2012/09/Powell.JPG

Sounds like projection to me. This comment could only come from someone who doesn't live next to the border. Do you really think we are not aware what's happening next door when we have 1,340 km border with them. Do you really think we need to listen US for that and we don't have our own intelligence? You can do better than that. I am guessing that this is a non-issue for you as you don't have to think about it daily. We don't have that luxury of trolling with this subject. But we deal trolls that do every day.

So instead of trolling, try empathy next time.

In most Western countries the press is much more independent than in Russia.  In the US, anyone, including journalists from major media outlets, are free to criticize the government without having to fear going to jail or worse.

For any example of what you consider to be western media propaganda, you can find other western media arguing against it.  Hell, there are some main stream media outlets that regularly repeat Russian propaganda here.  The press has freedom to publish what they like, and the people have freedom to choose which sources they rely on for information.  That's what western media really is, fyi.

USA is running to Saudia for help - correct me if I wrong

The US asked the Saudis to increase oil production. Saudis said they would.  Then they decreased it.  

You're also wrong about Europe not having a gas supply and $26 million is literally pocket change compared to whats being spent.  They can go through $26 million worth on artillery shells in an hour.

I also learnt it from the news channel and found out it correct that America is giving Russian aid with is worth 26 million and also the arm and aminuation
No doubt about it.

US is giving aid to Ukraine to fight Russia.

Saudi play dule - they want to keep the terms with USA alongside they don't want to ruin their relation with Russia and Israel.
Saudis are strange - while no muslim country want to keep term with Israel - Saudis are building modern city with them

Really? I thought all Russia media is censored there...what happened to RT, btw?

Here, this guy can explain to you how "free" your media is:

https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1589606899569377282

No, rt is not censored in the US.

Your link is censored in Russia, but not in the US.

Are you really silly enough to try and defend Russia by arguing that America doesn't have a free press?

He is not stupid, he is a liar, like Putin, like his Empire of Lies.

https://www.protocol.com/entertainment/rt-ban-roku-apple-directv

You seem confused.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNSfhhrWINE

If you knew history well, nobody would see Russia as the most aggressive country.  In reality, Russia is not aggressive, at least not that aggressive. Russia is like a big boss to rule the largest land areas in the world and to protect a home like this, you have to be tough as an iron. A vast land means endless natural resources and power. Anyone would want to steal or occupy a piece in order to survive. Why would you not be armed and protect what you already have ?  In terms of wars and aggression, The United States is far more aggressive and coersive than any other country in the world. Be aware.

I'm based on facts. Russia is an empire. Russia is a prison for many nations whose territories it has seized. Many peoples were deported from their homeland. After the fall of the communist regime, the empire partially collapsed, but Putin wants to re-capture the peoples who gained independence. It is a fact! I consider Russia to be an aggressive state, which is not so.

Because of its aggressive nature, Russia has become isolated from the civilized world. Her allies are North Korea, and Iran, where religious fanatics plunged the country into the Middle Ages.

Except 60% of Russia is uninhabitable.  It's just a frozen tundra.  This, along with rampant corruption from the top of government, explains why the largest country in the world is not among the 10 largest economies in the world.  There are 3 US States that have a larger economy than Russia.

Russia is on of the tough nations in the world and their president, Vladimir Putin is very arrogant and dangerous. He do things without second thought and his actions have claim so many lives of Ukraine citizens. Russia are no match for the world power, United States. The U.S president Joe Biden is very calm unlike the previous former president, Donald Trump which no develop nation invade any developing country. Ukraine are just fighting for their sovereignty and Russia should not arose the wrath of US, because it's definitely not going to be easy on them.

Yes. Siberia, where you can find frozen mammoths from thousands of years ago... frozen so fast that they still have the grass they were eating in their mouths and bellies, and with meat that is almost fresh enough to eat.

The Earth's magnetic poles are shifting. And with the shift may come the warmth that existed ages ago.

Position yourself in this part of the world, NOW, so you are ready for the warmth when it comes. However, cold didn't stop the Alaska pipelines, and thousands of people from living in Alaska. There is even a city called North Pole there.

The cold ain't nuthin'. Get those Siberian minerals. Steal them from Russia if you must. Bunch of US crooks.

8)

The loss of Kherson shows that the Russians no longer have the strength to move forward. Now the main thing for Putin is to keep the territory of Ukraine, which is in his hands.

I was watching the news and heard that too. At the end they all have to stop fighting - Russia only thinks they are powerful and they can do anything they want and the world would not speak up - like many muslims are killed around the world by the west but no one speaks up. But at least EU stood up for Ukraine. That so great.

President Putin is stubborn person who do we all know about he cannot dress back from his actions since this one started putting is the one that is making it to be more difficult and tougher four people of each nation and people of Ukraine so I don't think that the day young woman can surrender all country or free Ukraine with what I'm seeing

President Putin is stubborn and so is Biden and so is XI and so is Isaac Herzog
They only look for the opportunities and want to suppress the weak country in the name of war against terrorism