Bitcoin Forum

We all know that democracy means rule of the people. However, If a decision is adopted by the majority, It doesn't mean that It's totally true. Especially If the majority haven't good education level. In this case, should we consider that democracy Is dangerous for the global interest of the people ? What should we do in such cases
I hope you get my point

Education or educated people does not mean that they would always have the good interests of the punlic with them. DEMocracy meand the people and the people have diverse lifes and the differene n each and every one of them is the thing that makes democracy needed as this keans to let the people think that they would need and give and serve the public as much as you can

No.  Sometimes democracy gives too much freedom which is not good.  Uncontrolled that causes commotion.  People to rule is not necessary for countries where people claims power. Democracy may give freedom to choose on who to rule them but it also gives them the ability who choose that they can rule with them speaking around like a puppet.

It is kind of necessary because people need the nation to be ruled by themselves and not some other random person . Democracy is framework of rules and therefore it becomes the poeple that make the rules and follow the rules

Democracy isn't always necessary. Democracy means the rule of people. Democracy is freedom. Democracy is nice but what if majority of those who vote are uneducated or manipulated to become a vote buyer? Sometimes, democracy isn't good because some people take it for their advantage. Sometimes, it is also needed to have a strict government.

democracy is not necessary. our dear leader knows the best for us.

In such a case, making the mass educated/aware should be utmost priority. Because democracy is really a good thing for any country because it allows the normal citizens to take decisions and rule.

In war democracy stop, the republic elect a leader, who has goals and objectives to achieve. It's called the empire.with the support of the republic who has morphed into a war state the ennemies get crushed and democracy can be restored. In all events it's always better than barbarian occupation...

furthermore you fail in the trap of education. who tell you that educated can't have been feeded lies all along their education? For example imagine common core ruled by the friends of weinstein and hillary...

The real objectives is that most of soldiers under the leadership of the elected one are more or less okay with it, and clearly understand the perils and dangers that is posed by the enemies.

So actually to gain it's freedom from the western friends of hillary CHINA had to make great sacrifices. Today the friends of hillary worldwide, know or certainly will discover that there will be no hesitation to defend china from them.

What ever it takes.


of course hillary and her goons hate them.

Try readin "the best and the brightest" by david halberstam.

Edit:

Low iq people and idiots dont get to govern nations except avg. Iq of the population is already very low. I believe 90 is world average

Yes, democracy would always be that power wherein we have to always remember. Democracy is a power that shouldbalways be for the people. It should not be something that we should compromise against thenprogress or supposed development of a country.

democracy has a good and bad side, for example, democracy will be necessary because it will give the majority the chance to vote who they want to lead them. but if people don't know how to really use this then it will never be good.

no, I think it's dirty water, which is easy to catch fish. There must be a right choice)

i think the situation you told is impossible because in a class of students, there is group of person that has different beliefs so there is no unity.

democracy is good because the majority of people tells what is good for the cause

It's good to satisfy as large number of people as possible while ruling a country. But sometimes it's good to make an unpopular decision for the welfare of the nation than listening to the majority. Sometimes a smaller mass can be more correct than a large mass.

From my point of view, Democracy must only be for educated and clever people. Because of uneducated ones, most of the countries are ruled by some lunatic leaders. I think everybody does not have right to vote because voting is very critical stuff.

One of the most respected democratic values is freedom. For millennia many of the manifestations of freedom were not considered good. Even the greatest mind of antiquity, Aristotle, considered giving people the opportunity to live as they pleased, a sign of wrong, bad forms of government.

if democracy work in welfare of common people and do not corruption then the democracy become strong.like this democracy is necessary. if in democracy there is corruption in it and the state become unstable then dictator ship is better than democracy

Not entirely. Democracy simply states that the people has the right to express their opinions of certain issues to the government. Certain actions are also allowed such as strikes or rallies. But these opinions and actions are still controlled under the constitution. So the people does not really rule. It is not 100% freedom since there are still restrictions. But this is good so as to have control. Imagine being able to do whatever we want, I could see chaos! We can have the rights and freedom but limitations should still be set.

You make it sound like the democracy we have today is true democracy and the people actually do decide things. But this isnt the world we live in nor will it be. The decisions are made by a few powerful hands in the gov't

and yes they are smarter and likelier to make a better decision. However, at the very same time they could put their interests above the public (unethical but cmon its politics) or they could trade favors in order to advance

their careers (also unethical but cmon again still politics). That is why I hate the current system and do think if everyone is educated in your country that you should run a true free democracy system where everything is put

up to a vote!

In theory, sure, but unfortunately not in practice. Governing by majority creates minorities - whose interests are then more often than not underserved. And when you combine democracy with capitalism, the resulting governmental stew becomes an economy of haves and have-nots.

Democracy can be a bad idea, if the vast majority of the people are uneducated and are having a low IQ. Look at the case in countries such as Somalia and Congo. Do you think that democracy will survive in these areas? People in such areas tend to elect candidates who belong to the same ethnic and religious group, irrespective of their capability.

Sorry guys, but I cannot recall a single country (except perhaps Switzerland) where democracy is actually democracy, and not just a simulation of democracy. So what are we talking about?

Democracy in the US is certainly flawed, but democracy is necessary because there is no better system of government. To perfect democracy in the US, we need to get rid of the electoral college, and use the popular vote.

Yes. Even those who are scornful of democracy and who would fancy their chances if allowed to grab what they could would lose something of real value in a non-democratic society. Few of us value properly the benefits of living in a coherent, integrated society, where everyone has a value because everyone has a vote.

No. Sometimes democracy is used only as an excuse to do certain or random things that may actual end up ranting around putting blame on the government. Freedom and power of the peopleis not always good.  Sometimes it is the one that ruins good governance.

This issue was often in history discussed ,and most of the old Greek philosophers agreed that of all the possible rules democracy is the worst one.
They explained that even though it seems like the best solution the problem is people are easily manipulated,directly or indirectly.
Indirectly by lies,propaganda and fake news(yes,even back then),and directly by bribing politicians and corruption.
When you think about it in most modern countries democracy is completely new thing,
in the past there was mostly some kind of absolute ruler,good or bad.How this new kind of governance will work out,we're yet to see..

For me democracy is important because people are allowed to express freedom. The ruling doesn’t matter that much, but it is the freedom that is very important. Imagine the world without freedom.

In my opinions democracy is made for people who understands peace like those in Europe, North America, i mean the Western World but when it comes to the Arab countries, Latin countries and some parts of Africa, one needs to have a firm hand over them because they can easily get out of control at any time.

Right. Though it can also be easily manipulated and bent by "learned and intelligent" people for their own interests. Though of course if you're going to be givem a cboice between democracy and dictatorship or communism,  people will be free to fight for their rights in a democratic government

The first question, though, is what do we mean by democracy? I think there are three possible meanings.

1 - Political
2 - Social
3 - Economics

No,i don't think democracy is necessary,an absolute ruler can also be a good way of governance.
There are many examples of rich,well regulated states which have a monarch as a head of state,
and on the other hand you have pretty poor and corrupt democracies,so it's never black and white.

Really depends on the given situation. Other countries may need an iron fist but then transitions to a democratic kind and then federal. Mostly depends on what the people want or what the nation needs at the moment of election of leaders. But I believe democracy is giving the mass the power to choose a viable leader and I'm happy knowing I chose the right leader to rule the country.

A direct democracy is certainly dangerous because large portions of the public are completely ignorant to many political topics. Also, a direct democracy is literally a tyranny of the majority. That's why I believe a representative democracy/republic is a much better option than direct democracy.

You need to specify where you need to apply democracy. In government politics, organizational or corporate matters?

The need to use this form of leadership will vary in the environment and so much other factors.

1. Enhance the sense of empathy and compassion among the citizens
2. Avoidance of Violent Intercommunity Acts of Violence
3. Establish good communication between communities
4. Improving the sense of cooperation and mutual cooperation
5. Improving the sense of community responsibility

Democracy is necessary, because it promote rule of law, equity and equality before the  law,. Democracy and also  promote freedom of speech. Show me well developed country, and I will tell you they are practice democratic system of government, in others word democracy enhance good government. So democracy is necessary necessary in our society.

You’re exactly and perfectly right about that. Other countries need a different form of government besides democracy because not every country needs and wants what other countries want. To make it short, every country is different that’s why they need different forms of government.

Despite the fact that democracy gives the people freedom, and people are known to have diverse ideas and intentions, it does not always bring about conformity to situations. For this reason, I don't think democracy should be always necessary.

Of course, a person will cause tyranny, society will be unbalanced, democracy is the hearts of the people think, will become beautiful

  A good book on the topic, public domain, is Montesquieu's the Spirit of law.

That said, it is also important to understand what the law is too that transcends even nations.  Recommended readings are the tryal of John Lilburne and John Whorton, and also Joh's Locke's, the two Treatises of civil government.  Both are public domain.  By the time you are done the Lilburne case, you may then want to learn more about Roman legal practices.  Many online resources about that too. 

Yes, I get the idea. That's why absolute democracy is not always good as the masses might actually have different views and opinions about a topic which may cause division. If the leader however is good and knows how to strategize, then the authority should be given to him to decide on certain matters.

There are times that democracy is being abused by the people. We all know that the ruling comes from the people. However, there are times that because of too much ruling, the people lose their track and forget to remember what the goal truly is.

Personally, Democracy isn't a good idea why? People can abuse their authority over anything. And once this happen conflict among individuals will persist until the entire country plunge into chaos. So having one leader to rule the country is always the best option, ofcourse the leader must always listen to the people to avoid chaos.

depends, if most of the residents are high quality staffs ,yes, otherwise, no.

We have three types of organizational leadership forms:
democratic, authoritarian, and lassie fair.

In terms of political and governmental structure there are far more than your fingers can count.

Today, you can mix all these types together and build a unique system.

But in every case, it is important that there is a hint of democracy for the people to enjoy. Why? The lack of freedom causes revolts, then anarchy. It's not a pretty pcture.

I agree that democracy is not perfect because we can see a lot corruption, lies and bad things in average democratic society.
Still, when we compare today's democracy with social and political arrangements from the past, as feudalism or slavery society, democracy is much closer to a righteous and advanced society.
Democracy is necessary until we find something better. 

Why democracy is necessary. The great thing about living in a democracy is, well, living in a democracy. Characteristics of a democracy include things like power exercised by citizens, or officials elected by citizens. Majority rule, but with human rights, equality, freedom of media, speech and religion

democracy ?
when we are talking about democracy,
absolutely it connects with government,
of course people cannot just giving opinion and ask it to be rule of democration.
the function of government is to select which opinion is good or bad,
for me, whatever the people want to do, the point dont't hurt or disturb others.
if there is no democracy, it will be like north korean, they just follow what the king says.
and can get their freedom in their life.
that's not good also.
because we all guys not animals. wehave brain to think we have feeling to feel.
we have freedom to life in this world.

Not always. It depends on the situation of the society. If a society have many injustice events for the popo
Ulation then democratic governance is needed.

Democracy gets evoked only for quite irrelevant matters, when it comes to important decisions, they are never democratic.

Democracy is necessary now days in western society but in the same time it is highly overestimated.
Rather than democracy, economic prosperity matters more, many oil rich countries in the middle east have very satisfied local population even being devoid of western style democracy.
Also democracy can be equally manipulative as are some dictatorships, notable examples are Brexit, election of Trump etc.
More times than not, weak leaders hide behind peoples will even if that leads their nation into abyss.

sometimes democracy is necessary for each country, but for country with big problem in security, democracy is not necessary, because its country need full control from military or center government to guarantee the society.

It is true that democracy will be big problem when the decision made by the majority that on low level of education. I think in this case the democracy is not necessary to applied, even it shouldn't be applied. Democracy can be good and worse depend on the places and cases. 

Democratic values ​​are the values ​​that are absolutely necessary to develop a democratic government. The absence of such matters will result in a subtle effect of difficult administration.

I like to be neutral here I like what you said about not giving a good decision by the majority but I disagree about the low-educated part. I think democracy is not always discussed by educated people but rather by citizens who are concerned to their own country and has a good heart and wisdom.but I also agree to the "not giving a good decision" because based on my own experience people who are in a democratic country tends to overeact and has no discipline.There are some close-minded people that does not open their mind to new changes but always thinks about the negative side of every action that the government does. I know this our free-will but we also have to be open and think out of the box and not only think about what we know is right.

No it is not necessary all the time, it depends on the situation of the society and what kind of society a country has. In the philippines we have a democratic government. People has the freedom to express their feelings and their affirmtion and beliefs.

Because a dictatorial organization was failed, democracy was born. We always have to be renewing democracy.

Yes. Democracy is absolutely neccessary, if true peace and prosperity is to sustain in the world.

It is disappointing that some of the posters on here even considers the thought that democracy is an option. It only shows how much the governments and politicians have subverted the inherent freewill of the people.

There is no select lot of 'superior' and 'inferior' people. In my experience, it is the poorer masses that need democracy the most - it is precisely the lack of democratic opportunity that keeps them there. As for education, again, it is democracy that brings about education, prosperity/wealth and peace.

Every individual is sovereign, is equal before law, and should have the right to live with freedom from oppression from any source, and participate on policy that effects them.

Having said that, representative democracy that is currently practised across much of the world, does not, and never will be able to reflect true democracy. Right now it is only just a sham - the candidates who can fool most of the people get elected, then pretend to uphold the interests of their constituency while doing the exact opposite. Until participation of the entire citizenry is possible, democratic process is just a faux.

On the other hand, block chain technology has the potential to create the closest representation of true democracy.

I think democracy is necessary nowaday, we always need to have freedom to growth and free society to develope skills.

Completely perfectly agreed.. Democracy is the best regime which exists on earth nowadays. Until people will find a better regime than democracy, Democracy will remain as best regime. On the other hand, Democracy has drawbacks and people must dissolve its drawbacks away.

We live in the era of the "light" democracy - so people have the right to chose which irrelevant things they prefer. As for the relevant ones, others decide.

Democracy is necessary for the betterment of the peoples as well as the nation.If there is no democracy their will be no peace in the nation and also in the world.

Democracy is an acceptable option for civilized nations. If the country is inhabited by barbarians (for example, in Africa), then democracy will lead to civil war. In this case, a rigid authoritarian rule is necessary.

you can not get democracy unless you have a modern democratic government and a modern democratic society.the two things are interrelated

Well, every system has its pros and cons. If democracy has the con of majority of stupid people taking wrong decision, then in autocracy only one person can achieve that with 100% certainty. No system is perfect. Its we the people who need to behave and improve as a civilized society to take onus upon us to perform our duties. If every person does his job well, the world will automatically become a better place to live.But the dream of utopia will always be a dream as human beings are tuned to be attracted towards greed, power and lust ;)

The choice of regime in any country is a complicated historical process. I doubt democracy will remain in a country with the majority poorly educated. It'll just fail to remain democratic and sooner or later will turn into dictatorship, e.g. The history will show.

Yes, democracy is always required, nobody wants communism unless you are the committee member in it  ;D

Yes, I thinks democracy is  a main goal to pushing for better future.

Different countries obtain their different rules. Some give the priority to democracy and some use their another system. If you think about people and fulfill their dream and necessity then you have to give priority to democracy.

I feel in the future we will come up with a better solution. Who knows the next phase may be decentralizocracy :D

Because the system (democracy) ensures every citizen to engage equally in the life of the state through a guaranteed right. A country without the role of a citizen can not be called a country. feudal system for example, the people have no rights except a few royal families. Then we can see how the existence of a state that is governed in feudal system, or fascist etc. The people do not have the proper rights, either as human beings or as citizens

Democracy enable everybody express his view in the governing of a country. It is necessary for a country to always practice it to allow the average citizen to engage in it.

In most cases everything is settled in a democratic way.Especially in politics, no decision can be made if the majority isn't for it.Democracy is necessary when crucial events are about something.

Democracy is certainly necessary always, only people don't need to solve state issues and it's good to know those whom they choose to represent...and the people trust election campaigns, and then wonder why officials were not so good as they advertised themselves

For most cases yes it is necessary but there are certain cases when democracy is extremely abused and is used to take advantage of the freedom it gives. Democracy should always come hand in hand with being responsible and knowing what it entails to be given that much freedom

I think yes. If there were no democracy in the world, then there would be chaos. We need democracy, although we do not realize this.

Nice discussion. I strongly believe in democracy myself, in spite of all its flaws

There is also no chaos in other forms of governing like communism though. However, democracy gives you more freedom.

I agree with your opinion, sometimes democracy is not necessary. Sometimes the leader should be the one in charge to make decision for people, especially when the problem is too sensitive for the community.

Democracy is being highly adopted in this century. In the past times, word democracy was unknown and ruthless leaders forced the population to obey and listen to them. There are still some countries that haven't implemented democracy in their system because of the few important members of the society that are persistent to hold the population within the strict set of the rules. Today, democracy is widely spread and we can see all kind of referendums that are approved by the government. Power of the free speech is best advantage of the democracy in the current society.

Democracy isn't always a good thing at all, Sometimes with little or no democracy a country is able to thrive and though people claim that it gives the people a voice but it sometimes stall the progress of a country especially when there is no outright majority in the country. It makes the country ungovernable when the opposition is trying to belittle you at every turn.

Democracy isn't good always. In democracy, the views of the people are taken into consideration and the people's right are also respected. In democracy people involve themselves in building the nation or the organization since they are involve in decision making and what they say count. So is very necessary to employ democracy in governance. But it is vice versa. Other group of people need to be governed autocratically. Because decision making is quick especially in emergency situations and action need to be taken as soon as possible.

In implementing policies that would affect a whole country with its people, then I say yes everyone's opinion matters, even those who are less educated than others because everyone is at risk.
In matters, where decisions should be made promptly and where time is a constraint, then democracy falls a bit short. We can't have a team of engineers for example deliberating and voting on how they should implement a certain feature for example, that costs time and money. Instead, someone should be in charge, listening to everyone's opinion in order to form an informed opinion of his own and then go with it. That's more efficient.

Indeed, democracy can be dangerous. And that's why there is no such thing in real life. The powers that be are just feeding us what they and us think to be democracy but in fact it is no more than a fraud. But this is the case when two evils make a good and two wrongs make a right. If someone superior has forced true democracy upon us, as in experiment, it would be a complete disaster.

absolutely needed by everyone, we can't do things on our own if government will meddle on us and having no democracy in a country results in civil war because supporters of the government tend to have some arguments with people embracing the concept of democracy. But in my opinion if a country is having out of control and many groups getting armed I think that is the time where government should step in and a martial law should be declared to restore the order of the country.

Surely do buddy, education is key and integral to understanding how the current institutions work. If we don't have a proper understanding about them then we can't seek to better them in the future and thus education is crucial to advancing our societies to heights unknown.

Democracy is necessary, although it is imperfect. We must understand, to date, we have not created anything better that could replace it.

I think democracy is very important. It is an important symbol of the development of a country. The people have their own ideas and this will enable the country to develop better. If most people do not have a good education level, but democracy can give enjoy fair treatment, they are also very grateful to the government. ;D

many countries have failed to implement a democratic system.
democracy does not mean to follow the most opinions. instead democracy is freedom of expression.
 

I think meritocracy comes quite close to being perfect and efficient. The problem with it is that most people are ignorant and they follow those who can play on their feelings rather than take their thoughts. People choose those whom they like personally, not those who are actually better at something. And until common people become wiser and smarter, this will remain so.

Not really democracy also got its flaw, it is good to used democracy as the base to build a country, but democracy also need to be accompany by educated and able to understand other people point of view, if nit then the country will be thrown into chaos

Democracy does not mean complete and unlimited power of the people. The democratic structure in the country means that the government listens to the opinion of the people. The "people" in themselves are a huge substance, which can not have a single opinion at all. Therefore, we are given educated politicians who understand the economy and conduct statistics of the people's opinion.
And if you consider that in many countries under the guise of democracy thriving frank monarchy, we can say that anarchy is not to be feared ;D ;D ;D

Democracy is always essential and important regardless of wherever and in what work. Where there is democracy there is justice. Nowadays, most of the places are democratic state companies that are less respected. And compared with other countries in the world, Vietnam's democratic spirit is not high.

Yes, without democracy there is always a hard way to share the thoughts and feelings of people.

Democracy has it's own flaws (look at brexit, plenty of other examples too) but there isn't a better system. Governments need to change, hence elections etc; You can't keep the same people on the top as you will end up being a totalitarian state. More power to ordinary people the better over all. Crypto currencies are one of the things that are changing world's paradigm, just think about it - we don't need a bank any more to transfer value....

Democracy is needed unconditionally, to solve this or that question. We must understand that its absence can harm our society. But I think, that true democracy, unfortunately not.

Well, that is true. It's not necessarily that the majority agrees with something doesn't mean that it is helpful, take "mob mentality" for example. They just follow a certain trend not knowing if it would benefit them or not. They just follow the majority and act on their basest instincts. I believe the remedy here is the promotion of individual thinking and freedom of speech. Mostly we should encourage people to their own opinion about a subject without being affected by other's. We should be taught to see a topic for what it is and in different sides.

For me it is. I mean the fact that we are given the freedom of expression because of democracy is always a great thing for me. Having the power to say what you want and to be heard is already a great opportunity. The only problem that I see is people who abuse this power.

Democracy is always necessary its just that people should know how to abide rules to have peaceful life. Sometimes, democracy have been used under the groups against the government and by this government have to do action, here now enters abuse issues where victims were abused due to their acts supporting againts government groups.

I think Democracy is always necessary because it's framework of rule . But '' if the majority haven't good education level '' , i think we need to reconsider

Yes, everyone is created by God with freedom and democracy is a product of freedom if it is taken away from us even in just a single moment that's an act of unfaithfulness..

Democracy has it own good and bad sides. At the good side is the freedom to do alot and at the bad side the problem of abuse of the freedom. we tend to misbehave just to prove that we are under democratic regime and this can cause things to be out of place. we fall laws in the name of democracy and so we could be democratically also punished for breaking the laws.

It's a good thing on the surface as it gives the majority a voice and representation. A Democratic Republic is better however because it not only gives a voice to the majority, but also gives a voice to the minority.

Democracy is not perfect, but nothing better has yet been invented. All other methods of political rule led to even more disastrous results. Will there ever be a better system? Definitely. When you change the people themselves. No change in the best side of human psychology no positive changes in forms of government impossible.

That is not always the case. I am living in India, and in many of the states the voice of the minority is suppressed as a result of the combined voting strength of the majority. For example, in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, the Muslims are using their population power to completely sideline the minority Hindu and Buddhist populations. The same thing is happening in the Christian majority states, such as Kerala, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Meghalaya.

You are right about education level of society. Education is related with democracy. Democracy may be a kind of dictatorship if people in society are not well educated. Politicians may use democracy for their own benefits. It is a little bit dangerous.

Because (system) democracy allows the involvement of every citizen of a country.
Translation: In Wikipedia it is stated that "Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens have equal rights in decision-making that can change their lives Democracy allows citizens to participate-either directly or through representation-in the formulation, development and law-making. "
Medium State is "a group of people who occupy a certain territory and organized by the government of a legitimate state, which generally has sovereignty".
So, why is democracy important to a country?

democracy is a sign of the aspirations of the people, if there is a situation in which democracy is controlled by the majority, then as a good people we wajid admonish or even straighten it out, but most of the crowd are afraid to voice their aspirations, then let us try the democratic well, help others do not even evil people

This is always true because the number of well educated and smart people will always be smaller than those uneducated and dumb and all of them have the right to an equal vote.
How can a vote of a university professor who is an expert in the field be equal to a vote of a moron with an IQ of 60 and completely no education? There will never be enough experts to outweigh the votes of the morons, so the only way is for the experts to persuade the morons to vote their way. As we know this rarely works because if someone approaches the morons and gives them something that will directly benefit them, their vote will quickly change.

The application of democracy in the life of nation and state is very important to be realized. but a democracy like a double-edged sword on one side brings goodness and the other brings badness. One that brings badness is that sometimes democracy is used by irresponsible people to achieve their personal or group desires because of lack of education and morals.

of course democracy is important and it is always be, because the main point of democracy is the representation of the people, everybody must have a saying when it comes to policy and will, if we denied democracy because we think it is not adequate due to the level of education of the people that is also against the meaning of democracy, it doesn't matter who you are or what you are, you should have a voice in a system of power.

Democracy is not always good thing.
It is rather common practice to treat democracy as wonderful elixir, that can cure all problems,
but in practice if often means only populism and ostentation.

I think its not. Different types of government are applicable differently on every country. Some needs democracy while some are not. Democratic government must be in balanced. This type of government, major decisions is being decided by the majority, so if the majority is influenced badly, it can lead to wrong decisions, which is catastrophic.

Yes democracy is not only necessary but essential part of economy as well.

I’ve always believed that democracy, capitalism and economic progress are all intimately connected, that you can’t have one without the others.

I believe there is no absolute system of good and bad, it all depends on the condition of a country. For developed countries with high levels of education democracy can be the right choice, but for countries whose average education is still low democracy is less suitable, because it is easily mobilized by irresponsible parties

I completely disagree with your post. I will give you a very simple example. You can compare between China and India. During the past 2-3 decades, China has achieved enormous amount of economic growth, although the country is run by a dictatorship. On the other hand, India has lagged behind, despite being the largest democracy in the world.

I agree with your opinion!
Community education factor is very vital role in the world of democracy. But the lack of success of a democratic country can not be blamed solely on its less educated people.
Because I think every decision will be back to the leader, wise or not a leader can make decisions. A country if headed by a very long-serving leader or a king if ever made the wrong decision will still harm the state.