Is democracy always necessary ?

[JesusCryptos]

We live in the era of the "light" democracy - so people have the right to chose which irrelevant things they prefer. As for the relevant ones, others decide.

[Mustanzid]

Democracy is necessary for the betterment of the peoples as well as the nation.If there is no democracy their will be no peace in the nation and also in the world.

[Urbanbypas]

Democracy is an acceptable option for civilized nations. If the country is inhabited by barbarians (for example, in Africa), then democracy will lead to civil war. In this case, a rigid authoritarian rule is necessary.

[Yurkov]

We all know that democracy means rule of the people. However, If a decision is adopted by the majority, It doesn't mean that It's totally true. Especially If the majority haven't good education level. In this case, should we consider that democracy Is dangerous for the global interest of the people ? What should we do in such cases
I hope you get my point

Yes, democracy would always be that power wherein we have to always remember. Democracy is a power that shouldbalways be for the people. It should not be something that we should compromise against thenprogress or supposed development of a country.

you can not get democracy unless you have a modern democratic government and a modern democratic society.the two things are interrelated

[Vishnu.Reang]

Well, every system has its pros and cons. If democracy has the con of majority of stupid people taking wrong decision, then in autocracy only one person can achieve that with 100% certainty. No system is perfect. Its we the people who need to behave and improve as a civilized society to take onus upon us to perform our duties. If every person does his job well, the world will automatically become a better place to live.But the dream of utopia will always be a dream as human beings are tuned to be attracted towards greed, power and lust

[Blockgraham]

The choice of regime in any country is a complicated historical process. I doubt democracy will remain in a country with the majority poorly educated. It'll just fail to remain democratic and sooner or later will turn into dictatorship, e.g. The history will show.

[seasonw]

Yes, democracy is always required, nobody wants communism unless you are the committee member in it 

[sonlazio]

Yes, I thinks democracy is  a main goal to pushing for better future.

[Rony24h7]

Different countries obtain their different rules. Some give the priority to democracy and some use their another system. If you think about people and fulfill their dream and necessity then you have to give priority to democracy.

[djangocoin]

I feel in the future we will come up with a better solution. Who knows the next phase may be decentralizocracy

[marinomario]

Because the system (democracy) ensures every citizen to engage equally in the life of the state through a guaranteed right. A country without the role of a citizen can not be called a country. feudal system for example, the people have no rights except a few royal families. Then we can see how the existence of a state that is governed in feudal system, or fascist etc. The people do not have the proper rights, either as human beings or as citizens

[yadwoa69]

Democracy enable everybody express his view in the governing of a country. It is necessary for a country to always practice it to allow the average citizen to engage in it.

[Tozi]

In most cases everything is settled in a democratic way.Especially in politics, no decision can be made if the majority isn't for it.Democracy is necessary when crucial events are about something.

[Naoko]

Democracy is certainly necessary always, only people don't need to solve state issues and it's good to know those whom they choose to represent...and the people trust election campaigns, and then wonder why officials were not so good as they advertised themselves

[gabmen]

Democracy is certainly necessary always, only people don't need to solve state issues and it's good to know those whom they choose to represent...and the people trust election campaigns, and then wonder why officials were not so good as they advertised themselves

For most cases yes it is necessary but there are certain cases when democracy is extremely abused and is used to take advantage of the freedom it gives. Democracy should always come hand in hand with being responsible and knowing what it entails to be given that much freedom

[nagatraju]

I think yes. If there were no democracy in the world, then there would be chaos. We need democracy, although we do not realize this.

[ankitasrivastav30]

Nice discussion. I strongly believe in democracy myself, in spite of all its flaws

[bitcoinKnight809]

There is also no chaos in other forms of governing like communism though. However, democracy gives you more freedom.

[LeeSeungGi]

I agree with your opinion, sometimes democracy is not necessary. Sometimes the leader should be the one in charge to make decision for people, especially when the problem is too sensitive for the community.

[herecomesjohnny]

Democracy is being highly adopted in this century. In the past times, word democracy was unknown and ruthless leaders forced the population to obey and listen to them. There are still some countries that haven't implemented democracy in their system because of the few important members of the society that are persistent to hold the population within the strict set of the rules. Today, democracy is widely spread and we can see all kind of referendums that are approved by the government. Power of the free speech is best advantage of the democracy in the current society.