Bitcoin Forum

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

No, bounty hunters are welcome!
We made additional bounty functionality to our exchange project: Ziggurat token TELEGRAM BOUNTY - JOIN OUR CHANNEL AND GET 30 ZIG
https://ico.ecex.exchange/telegram-bounty-join-our-channel-and-get-40-zig/
Telegram https://t.me/ZigguratICO
Log in our IN-HOUSE BOUNTY  https://ecex.exchange/ (https://ecex.exchange/)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVLMQiQX0AEyqTN.jpg

Who said bounty hunters are guilty? Bounty hunters are not lowering any rate at all, if anything, they are generating additional exposure for the ICO so that ICOs are likelier to succeed. Besides, if giving out bounties were not profitable, ICOs wouldn't be offering them in the first place.

I think what OP was alluding to was the fact that bounty hunters feel like they are under constant prosecution here at the forums. Whether that be from big ranking members who hate the thought of bounty or whether that be from ICOs calling for KYC on some projects. It just seems that this aspect of the forum isn't wanted, which is weird because they offer it. Kind of a catch 22 you can't win whatever side you are on.

The issue with bounty hunting is surrounding spam. Theymos (who runs the forum) has said himself that he likes that people can earn a little using the forum but he wants to maintain quality posting and discussion. This is why Merit changes were introduced.

I do not agree with that. I have noticed a trend with some investors. There are investors, who because of the bonus gotten from their investments in coins or tokens decide to drop the price in order to sell early and move over to another investment.

Things do seem less spammy since we have the merit system, but looks like low ranked members can barely rank up no more.

Bounties are a great way to generate awareness of coins.  The value of a coin is impacted by how many users it has and generally the more the better.  People that participate in the bounties help spread the word about the coin and should be rewarded.  The problem with spam is real though and I think the merit system is a step in the right direction.

It is expected that when the ICO has a bounty campaign, by the time of the distribution of bounties, some bounty hunters would immediately sell their coins for various reasons that's why it is expected that the price of coin would go down and if the project has true potential then it would grow organically. There are some bounty hunters who would immediately sell their coins because they know that the price would go lower and then if they like the project then they would buy it cheaper resulting to having more coins than what they receive.

The strategy of some ICO though is to distribute the tokens after maybe a month after being listed in exchanges so that the coin would already be having a stable value and the distribution of bounties wouldn't affect the price that much in case bounty hunters decide to sell their coins. I saw some ICOs that warn their investors beforehand that the price of their coin may not moon immediately because some bounty hunters would sell their coins for whatever price at the beginning and they would see the price growth after a few months.

SOME of bounty hunter do that, BUT please remember that bounty hunters is really helping to promoting a projects. A tweet that you read the article that you read some video you watch at youtube is made by all those bounty hunters. What make rate decrease is "maybe" because some bounty hunters sell all his coin immediatly when get it before any other person do. So almost all buy order filled. If the token really worth that coin or token will not have difficutly have the price back to normal, beside that bounty hunter allocation from total supply of the token cant be bigger than 5%.

Well, if you're looking for shitposts, then look no further than this thread--it's filled with them.  And it looks like they were all written by members who probably won't ever earn enough merit to reach Sr. member status, but we'll see.  I've been telling myself that it'll take some time, and the amount of garbage on bitcointalk will subside, but I honestly thought I'd see results a lot quicker.  What are people getting out of writing this garbage:
And most of the rest of the posts don't really say much of anything.  The OP doesn't even make a whole lot of sense, because it's a poorly-formulated question.

I don't know about bounties, but sig campaigners are largely responsible for the shitposting problem.  Account farmers are necessary because the bct account market is alive and well, so that's another part.  The toolbags who chase after airdrops tend to pollute the whole altcoin section, but this doesn't bother me much since I have most of it on ignore.  One of the best things I ever did on bitcointalk.
Ah!  In that case, I'd say why wouldn't you?  Most of these projects aren't destined to change the world by any means.  Holding onto any of those tokens is basically like watching your money burn--I think most of them are going to be worthless, and sooner rather than later.

I think he is referring to the general sentiment that profession bounty hunters dump their coins and tokens immediately, sometimes causing the coin price to sink below the ICO price.  That may often be the case, but if the project was worth investing in the first place, don't worry about it.  From what I've seen, ICOs normally pay the buyers a few days before the bounty hunters, so if they have doubts about the project, they can always get out before the bounty hunters.  

But I wouldn't invest in a project that I didn't have long term faith in, so I couldn't care less if bounty hunters dump.  IMO, it will be their loss in the long run.  

It depends which exchange the project get's listed on after the ICO.  If it's only on a small exchange with very low trading volume.  Bounty hunters dumping immediately after receiving their bounties will affect the price negatively.  I have seen this happen many times. 

I believe that bounty hunters are just doing their job. They are advertising the product and therefore deserve their intended bounty as well. If should it be true then it should be planned well since advertising is really a good part of a business exposure as said that is why I could agree with you.

This might be related to multiple account usage that has grown recently to larger scale. This kills the profits because there is no organic marketing that is going on and thus it causes the loss of investment. That is just one of the reason I feel why bounty hunters are not welcome much these days. However the situation will change soon if the organic marketing is focused and new ways of applications are brought into effect.

you mean after ICOs are finish bounty hunter sell their coins at lower price compared to ICO price. ICOs can choose not to run bounty campaign but ICOs need exposure so they need bounty hunters to spread their project details. some or most of bounty hunters need money so they sell it right away after ICOs is finish.

In majority case small percentage of supply wont crash the market so above argument is not completely true
Bounty hunters only move the market temporarily because they usually dump coin after they get the bounty
If the coin itself has good value perception, then it will go up after the dump
But if the coin fundamentally weak, the bounty dump will trigger mass exit (crash) that maybe take longer time to recover or not recoverable at all
On the bright side if a coin bounce back after dump period, then it will shine in the future  ;)

many bounty hunters are only concerned with the immediate benefits of getting paid for them. many do this by not thinking about the state of the coin in the market and that is deviating from the strategy designed by investors. perhaps that is one factor of the bounty hunter's fault.

Bounty hunters have nothing to do with ICOs and projects' failure because every ICO or product or project must conduct bounty campaigns because bounty hunters are helping them to spread the word and their products and projects information.
Bounty hunters must be paid bounty stakes because we are eligible of getting tokens because they are using our time and efforts to promote and advertise their products and services or projects.
That's the whole thing!

Indeed, in the first days after the generosity of the tokens earned from the ICO token, the market price of the tokens falls due to the fact that many of them immediately try to sell the received tokens at almost any price. However, if the project is promising, this can not be a problem, because in a month or slightly more the value of the token is restored and continues to grow. Moreover, sometimes companies delay deliberately payment of their tokens, or pay them in certain portions, or freeze the movement of tokens in purses until a certain date. So this can not be a big problem for the ICO team.

maybe because bounty hunters dump their coins after receiving their stakes. But its always been the reason why bounty hunters join the campaign in the first place. There's also an advantage on selling coins in the market so there are supply and circulation. just not big dumps. I think its more on the duty of the developers to create campaigns to let hunters hodl more to their rewards.

please explain in more detail what you mean, you do not give any source to the assumption you are saying. so I can not judge or respond to what's going on, say your version

Not all hunters perform the work correctly, many don't care at all for what they advertize. The main thing to get the profit. But at all this without hunters there would be no successful companies therefore they the integral component of ICO.

Bounty hunters are not guilty.
They did a great job as bounty hunter to promote the ICO.
the only problem is, there are so many ICO that already reached the hardcap and decided to run away.
Even the project became a failure, it's not bounty hunter's fault too.

True! ICO's team can change rules, don't approve your account and cut the pool. Fortunately bounty hunters don't invest their money. So they just lose their time but not real money.

I can not agree that bounty hunters are guilty for investment profit. I'm a bounty hunter (you could see it in my signature; D). But that does not mean that when I get "x" amount of tokens I will go and dump the price as soon as it goes to the market. In fact, those who dump the price are the investors who invest in a given ICO at pre-sale stage and get a 20-30-40% bonus. These are the people that make the other investors to suffer lost. But those are the rules of the ICO. If you do not like this rule ... just do not invest in it, but to blame the bounty hunters it is not fair.
Also, the real idea of ​​the bounty hunters is to populaze ICOs, so you can go and check this ICO's website, whitepaper, idea, team, etc. like I'm doing for dropil for example, and to make a decision by your own if you want to invest in this ICO or not.
I do not see why you should blame me for your investment. The decision to invest in a ICO was yours, the decision when to sell is yours, I just showed you a ICO that I think has a good potential. The decisions after that are all yours.

Bounty hunters are just a promoter who doing their tasks promoting a ICO Project so the ICO can be known to the investor so they interested to investing, there is many ways to promoting an ICO, so if bounty hunters is seen guilty for the volatile price on the market this is not an fair allegations. as long as the project manager need bounty hunters help and the quota still open and the project looks promising i guess nothing wrong in here.

It is bullshit. bounty hunters mostlly have approximetely 1% of total share. If the price can be dumped very shaarply with only bounty share then the problem is not bounty hunters. It means that investors do not believe in the project. because it is always a good chance to put buy walls during bounty distribution time if you believe in project enough.

yups,bounty hunters are the responsible upon ico's success because they take a full responsibilities on the advertisements and popularization of every project,so they deserve much income than investors .if hunters is not there every ico project will come to nothing because of un popularity

Bounty hunters are the least of a ICOs problems. There have been some tests done, With and without signature campaign, and the ICO that had 2% of its total earned about 40% more than the ICO that did not have signatre campaign. Sure bounty hunters always tank the price when the bounty is released, but it always go up if the project isnt shit from the start.

who said it? I just heard from you. no, like that we are all mutually beneficial and profitable. I personally followed the campaign and invested in some of the ico I have learned.

Thanks to bounty hunters, lots of people know about new projects. They contribute to discovering them.

The only thing some bounty hunters are guilty is making shitty posts and publishing low-quality content. But I think this will change eventually when ICOs realize that low-quality stuff doesn't do any good for their projetcs.

Bounties are a good way to create awareness to ICO projects. also you deliver tokens that could be traded in a later stage so that  way help the coin to be traded.

It is already starting. Look at XiWATT. They basically removed their Reddit Bounty due to people simply posting links and upvoting them with hundreds of fake accounts. That's actually hurting the campaign instead of helping it. And I see this kind of behaviour in nearly every Reddit and Twitter bounty. Or airdrops.

why guilty? whereas with the existence of bounty hunters help ICO promotion in his project increasingly help the success rate of ICO in my opinion.

Bounties usually represent 2% from the total number of coins.
And from those 2% , it's an even lower percent of bounty hunters who choose to sell their coins.
So no, bounty hunters don't have the power to influence the price of the coin long-term.

Although if a large number of people sell a coin simultaneously then definitely there can be a big dip, but we cannot say that bounty hunters are the reason, anyone can cause this, some big investor who needs money or want to cashout can dump the price and similarly the team that holds big chunk of coins can also dump it, so blaming bounty hunters is not right as vast majority of them holds for a better price just like investors and supporters of the project.

I do not think the bounty hunter is guilty. Bounty hunters are highly acclaimed and they help make ICO projects more popular. ICO projects will be invested and their currencies will become more valuable.

LOL,its not the fault of these bounty hunters,its with investors because if they really trust the project they will wait until the value of the coin has reached decent amount,why would they invest and then dump it as soon as they get the tokens?for me bounty hunting needs a lot of waiting because it will take time for these developers to finish their job.

How can 1-2% of total tokens sold (not emitted)  possibly influence the remaining 98-99%? What a nonsense!

I'm talking about the fact that bounty hunters are often accused that they drop the rate of a token or a coin! I'm  sure that hunters can not influence the course because they are tightly tied to a dedicated pool on a bounty campaign!

Not all the bounty hunters are dumb,but i couldnt disagree most of the bountry hunters are dumping their tokens as soon as these tokens were distributed and put into some exchanges,these people doesnt value the coin because if they trust the project they will hold it until the developer has fully developed the coin.

I think bounty hunters are not to blame, because they are walking on track, there is absolutely no effect or ability to lower interest rates especially that causes token distribution or coins to be inhibited, I think the change is due to a system change that can not be as easy as dominated by bounty hunters, they just wait and hope according to the promised part in gift giving, I think bounty hunters is a part that can help in the success of a marketing and sales project. different from the investors.n the bounty hunters willingly wait patiently for the distribution of tokens and coins from the company even they are many who until not get paid because the target is not a goal.

ICO's team can change rules, don't approve your account and cut the pool.

I supporting this opinion, because serious project will buy their tokens after ICO end and stabil their currency, and it dont depend from hunters or investors.. also serious project of course always in demand

Some are just taking the advantage since most of the ICO are so risky, that's why it's better to have some than nothing if it fail. A wise trader would sell most of his crypto when it is green and buy when it is red. At this way, he will earn enough profit and then do it again but it's not that simple like the way i explained it.

I think this is right to some extent, not totally right. Some bounty hunters, not all believe in dumping their coin from bounty reward immediately they are given which will definitely have an effect on the price of the coin.

Why they have to buy back their tokens? Where they have to find enough money for this strange deal?

Bounty hunters help promote a project and can increase the success rate of their presale and ICO's.
They get paid for that in exchange. Nothing wrong with that.
The issue here probably  is that bounty hunters dump their bounties the moment they have the chance to sell.

I think bountiers not guilty but some are just abusive that might making it low quality posts or advertising. However we are just following instructions from project and if ever we don't follow correctly we won't receive any stakes or rewards. it's up to the project team and campaign manager how to descipline the participants but if to sum it up, both project and the bouny hunter benefit if the campaign become successful!

The problem is most ICO creators don't know about rates so they can't spread reasonable amount of tokens for marketing purpose. If they get a professional help that would be win win for both part. Bounty users are not guilty here, ICO creators decide how much tokens will be given in bounty campaigns.

This is all because of the negligence of most teams.They just want to collect a lot of money. After the ICO, team forget their investors and their coin.

Well i don't think that it's bounty hunters fault the blame is the investors/potential investors why? Because sometimes they don't see the potential of a coin so matter how hard the bounty hunters and advertising team do to advertise the companies' ICO on social media sites and biggest advertising sites they are still ignored that's why some ICO's didn't reach their quota and to compensate, the bounty rewards were reduced.

Bounty hunters dump their tokens the soonest time possible and even on way cheaper price than the ICO. This makes the price low. But this should not be a concern since it is only temporary. If you invested on a good project, it should recover the price really quick. If it does not, then it is problem in the devs and the project not the bounty hunters.

What????!
2 percent of the whole ICO?! Do you really think that it can shake the value of the coin?
That is why they are giving away that small amount for it not to affect the money invested by the investors. For the ROI to stay intact.
Look if they really sold a good amount or reached the hard cap then if there is anyone guilty, mostly it will be investors too. Buyers also.
Bounty hunters also buy tokens if they see a good service behind it.
If shit happens, then they will also be affected.

it could be that bounty hunters affect selling and marketing value if they are not committed and promised and give a negative image of the company and the project it follows, in other words it causes a negative image in the eyes of investors and other companies so that it will reduce the value of trust and the low purchasing power, but that is only a small possibility of the bounty hunters because they are clearly responsible and do not want to lose because the struggle is in vain.

Bounty hunters, guilty of what? I don't know why people should ever think that way. Bounty hunters are the live wires of any ICO. For any ICO to succeed it needs promotional efforts and marketing. The problem is that many bounty managers would always device means to deprive bounty hunters their rewards at the end of the ICO. They will always look for one excuse or the other to withhold payment due bounty hunters. Without bounty hunters most ICOs won't succeed. Managers should have a rethink. Leave those craps about selling low,that is not the issue. Price is determine by market forces not by any individual except there is manipulation some where.

Some price drop always happens after the bounty coins has been accrued and when the coin is already being traded somewhere. Bountyhunters want to get immediate profit. Not all of them but the major part. But of course it's just a local "pit" on the price graph. And even if this tragically lowers the price at the moment, investors just should wait a bit if they truly believe in this project. Moreover, they can use this drop to buy more coins and treat it like a second chance to make a profitable investment :)

Usually sometimes the bounty hunters can cause a drop in price as a result of dumping of a token/coin but that depends on the overall prospects of the coin.If it has good prospects people will be happier to hold rather than dump.

agreed, some of the devs/admin of a channel in telegram even saying these are free coins, i don't understand why do they have to belittle what bounty hunters have done or contributed to their project yet in the first place they are the one decided to accept this kind of advertisement system. Mostly of investors do not know what the value of labor service and it's weird they've invested on ICO and then they want profits right after the coin gets listed in exchange.

No, bounty hunters are not guilty, we're the one who helping them to endorsed the project through social networking sites. We're the one who helping them, by helping them, we are rewarded with the small amount where the project profits. We only get 1 to 3 % from the profit. Even we don't use our cash, buy we support the project by our efforts. Efforts that the project will be broadcast and known by others.

Well this is true, but don't happen too often. Usually when the bounty campaign is over and tokens are paid and listed on the exchanges. Then most of bounty hunters are selling their coins and the price drops.

There really aren't any problems with bounty hunting as long as they're not spamming like a dweeb, which is what most of the signature spammers are doing. They barely read the title of a thread and then drop off some incoherent nonsense that is vaguely related to it instead of having actually discussions like you know, the thing that a forum is meant to be used for.

If you are a Spam bounty hunter that does not contribute to this forum. then you are guilty. This is the reason why theymos implemented merit system. to lessen the Spam reply and topics flooding in bitcointalk.

This is also the main reason why ICO campaign rewards are getting low. thanks for the implementation of merit system. the trust for quality, constructive bounty hunters are now going up.

Is merit actually being considered in bounty campaigns now? On top of activity level that is.

I think that since opportunities for hunting bounties rewards exist so it shows that developers of the project doesn’t aware enough about the system they created. It is better to avoid such projects I suppose.

I think OP meant something different. Just did not correctly formulate the question. Most likely was too emotional. Sometimes emotions do not allow to concentrate.

So, as far as I understand, it's about having ICO and there is a bounty. Bounty members work and spend their time. As a result, the project does not gain even a minimum amount on sales. All money is returned to investors. But the bounty hunters remain with nothing. Get just zero.

The second situation. ICO successfully, collected a lot of money. But suddenly after the bounty company is over, the bounty rules change. Now all the members of the bounty need to confirm their identity. But the problem is that many countries have a ban. As a consequence, such bounty hunters worked for free.

Is this honest? No, it's not fair! Will this change? No, it will not. Project developers and bounty managers do what they want.

Bountyhunters does not usually give such a large percentage of us to seriously influence the price. In addition, many hold a part of the tokens, sometimes everything. The price after the end of the ICO often bring down large investors to repurchase.

Actually the word guilty is only use for the person who made a bad thing or making any unlawful actions, but as long as we are pairly balance between crypto business and workers we don't need to use any words of accusation like guilty.

At first look, I couldn't get what OP was trying to say and after reading some of the posts I guess many people accuse bounty participants to degenerate the value of the project.Having a bounty or not is a decision of the project owners and I don't think it is wrong to be part of it.

We have normal bounty haunters (that holding their tokens for a little time) and we have newbie bounty hunters (that selling their tokens just after distribution and it's affecting the price, they are actually guilty). You need to understad which one are you.

I do not agree with the opinion that the hunters are to blame . Usually 2-4 % is allocated to bounty rewards . And I think it does not really affect the price

I think bounty hunters aren't problematic unless they scam the projects. I see it as a way to promote and support your favourite project. But some people use weird methods like spamming altcoin forums, posting weird links, trying to scam bounty projects by doing double entries to different addresses so on.

Actually most of the time it’s investors who blame the bounty hunters. I can understand them they think bounty hunters get the coins for free which they paid money for but this is not a correct way of thinking. Bounty hunters spend time and they play a very important role in the advertisement of the project.

actually to say guilty it is a less precise sentence to be expressed. because I think the bounty hunters sell it by not putting up another thing because they only get out of their job and it's natural whether they want to sell or hold it it's their own right either at a price down or a high price.

I think this is just a perception, this always occur when the price of a token dump immediately after launch on exchange, but I have seen several ICO without bounty campaigns dumped after their list on exchanges

It's bullshit.
Participants of the bounty make advertising for the project and they are useful. Even if they sell their tokens - they have the right to do so. Although I do not do this if I believe in a project

It is not real bounty hunters like me . Because many of them hodling coins because they got them without payment , i am thinking like that .

I have one question, why do you think that we are guilty? I do not consider myself guilty of anything, I do a good deed, I inform people about the information, for this matter I get a small reward, so I'm not guilty, the decision is made by the person himself, nobody here imposes anything on him

I do not have same idea. Rules are very clear. Bounty hunter is not guilty but multi participation is guilty!

I think bounty hunters are not guilty, they're working for the projects , make the marketing becoming effective and gain the tokens from that projects.
Bounty hunters only are guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. Noone in this forum supports for using many accounts at all.

I supporting this opinion, because serious project will buy their tokens after ICo end and stabil their currency, and it dont depend from hunters or investors.. also serious project of course always in demand

Last two days to participate in our last airdrop. All participants who have bought at least 100 ZIG (0.015 ETH) will get
additional 100 tokens on 24.02.2018 (Estonia 100) https://ecex.exchange/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWtKwahVAAAIAaH.jpg

it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.

We arent guilty,because it is a strategy to get more profits,dumping shit tokens after getting listed to exchanges isnt a crime which is why you shouldnt be saying that,hunters deserves and has the right to do whatever they want to their rewards,they arent the cause of the problem,the token itself do you think hunters will dump quality tokens ?no.

The problem is not with some fantastic "lowering the rates" but with that kind of bounty hunters that came on thatforum for bounty rewards only and has no knowledges about that sphere. And they start spamming here giving a wrong ridiculous advice to investors just to hit the bounty score. That is the real problem.

You do realize that they earned those coins or tokens and it is up to them what they wish to do with them, don't you? Why do people forget such simple things? There is nothing wrong about bounty hunters selling their rewards whenever they want since it is their money at the end of the day. No matter what anyone says, almost any hunter would sell their rewards as soon as they receive them in order to convert it into FIAT as quickly as possible. Personally, I have done this many times myself and this does not make anyone guilty. If someone feels that way, it is best to ignore such people.

Although some bounty hunters are guilty of selling their tokens are a lower price,  I think it will not affect much on the projects token price since what goes to bounty hunters are only a small portion of the whole investment that a project got during the ICO. Bounty hunters only get 1-2% and approximately 98-99% are ICO investors.

guilty? no, they only get the most prize of 8% of total supplay, and they work to promote the project here not bounty the guilty, but because of demand and supply market. so this win- win solution for cheap marketing  :D

Without any problem, the bounty thread can get better publicity for the project.
So this is obviously a win-win situation. ;D

Bounty hunters guilty?
I won't believe or accept that how can you tell me that the people creating awareness, exposing it to the public are guilty  only a fake team that doesn't want to pay would say such

We can't avoid this situation because bounty hunters upon receiving their bounty they will sell that right away though not all but most the them will do. Usually if you are an investor, you will hold your investor for years before selling it.

I don't agree with your point. It's part of the marketing efforts of ICO's, gaining exposure and attracting more potential investors. What's being said about bounty hunters selling off their gains once the token hits the exchanges can also be implied to normal ICO investors. It's not an issue with the bounty hunters, just different people have different objectives with their investments. In the end it's a part of the game.

If the project is successful the remaining investors will still see gains eventually. If you're not out to keep the coins for longer terms I suggest you to invest in projects with a working product.

Here's a good topic for finding suggestions of such projects: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2451482.0

I dont think this must he an issue,or maybe OP is one of those whos "Guilty"that he has claiming.
Bounty hunters are use to this,and they know what they are doing so wheres the guilt there?
Sad to say maybe they ate just a noob bounty hunters thats why they are crying about this issue when they can find good ico project to gain what they really need o earn

i understand why called bounties hunters are guilty because bounties hunters usually will sell their tokens immediatelly after get paid and automatically the price of those token will fall because most of them are more likely to dumped the price and that's why some of ICO project only alocated 10% or less from total tokens supply for bounties program to ensure the price at the exchange more stable and not fall to the deep

Guilty for those bounty hunters who had multiple accounts in a certain ICO signature bounty campaign which I think is greedy to earn much profit than the others. I also agree that after the ICO campaign, instead of investing in such ICO, most of the hunters will just have to claim the token reward and change to fiat money but you cannot blame them for that because earning profit is what bounty hunters do for a living.

Firstly, investors get their coins of bounty hunters. Secondly, investors get from 40 to 80% of the total pool of released tokens, and bounty hunters - 1-2% of the sold. Are the above points not a proof of the fact that bounty hunters can not affect the exchange rate of the coin?

I also think that the organizers should support the course of their project. It is possible not to immediately give a reward for a bounty campaign, while investors do not have the opportunity to sell a coin.

Bounty hunters do a great job to promote the ICO. the only problem is, there are so many ICO that already reached the hardcap and decided to run away, like Envion.

I think the statement is not true,
because the bounty hunters acts as marketing that helps promote a project, or a coin to be launched.
and in return for the marketing work, it is only natural that bounty hunters get paid.

I think maybe bounties hunters are guilty because hunters will usually sell their tokens immediately after being paid and automatically the token price will fall because most of them are more likely to dump the price. Maybe that's why some ICO projects only allocate less than total offer tokens for bounties, they want to make sure prices are stable and do not fall due to massive sales after bounties finish.

Bounty hunters get's only 1 or 2% of total sales. So they really won't be the reason for a project failure. Bounty participants help to market the project and get new investors. If a project is good, then it will make investors successful. Did you give bounty hunter the credit when a project succeed? If yes, then okay. If no, then why do you think they are guilty? Bounty participants get paid for their job, no one giving them free money. It's an investment also.

It's natural. You always have to find someone to blame for your mistakes. The easiest way to blame the hunters. As if they can influence something with 1 percent of all coins.
But when you invest your money in a bad project, and someone gets coins for free, you need to blame him

Well, Im absolutely new so Im quite confused. However, I do not agree with that. I have noticed a trend with some investors who decide to drop the price in order to sell early and move over to another investment.

I don't agree on that. Bounty hunters are part of the success of the project as they are the medium to promote the projects. How would they become guilty? Because the price drops? Common, bounty allocation budget is just 1 to 3% of the total token. It most probably the investors who got bonus token at presale and sold all of them after market lunch. But this is just in a short period, if the project becomes succesful in the future then definitely the price will recover and even more.

After receiving bounty payments, hunters begin to sell their crypto currency sharply on the market and at that time the value of the currency falls. As a rule, in a week the price is restored to its previous positions.

The development team of the project they will not care about the coin that the bounty hunter holds, it usually ranges from 1% -5% of the total. Very small compared to total supply

I also do not understand why the bounty members are to blame.  After all, it is from the beginning embedded in marketing that a certain proportion is received by bounty managers.  And they earn their tokens with honest labor.

I agree with what you are saying here. You cannot blame bounty hunters for causing damage towards the project since they earned their tokens and coins and they are free to do whatever they want to with their rewards. If the project has potential, it will survive no matter what. The truth is that majority of the bounty hunters participate in campaigns for quick profits which makes sense which campaign managers are obviously aware of.

Without bounty hunters, the promotion of these projects will be difficult to achieve. So I don't think bounty hunters are guilty. On the contrary, bounty hunters should be respected. Without their efforts to contribute and help promote this project, others will not be able to invest in ICO. ICO will be a joke, which is a huge loss for the project and the entire cryptocurrency market.

Bounty hunters boost the ICO. So, how they can be guilty?
I think they are the asset  ;D of an ICO.
Moreover, it depends on the project. If I see some potential in a specific coin/token, why will I sell?
That's it.

Most of the ICOs these think bounty hunters are the main cause of drop in coin prices because they got the coins very easy and so tend to dump them early. The ICOs always forget that it was through the hard works of these bounty hunters that brought the investors. Although hunters have some bad sides their benefits to the ICO is worth their inclusion

Bounty hunters are not guilty. Everyone has different opinions. I feel that if there is no participation of bounty hunters, who will propagandize the project? The project has no visibility so how can it develop? This is my personal opinion!

to anticipate it maybe you can hold only. If the results of the ICO potentially could certainly return to ICO prices even more. This strategy alone in withholding what it looks like, and not from the bounty hunter. they have the right to sell what they can even after ICO though.

It doesnt matter even if the ico is good or not, bounty hunters will still continue to sell whatever they have or as long as the ico had just been finish. all of us wants to earn a profit or a free money out of nowhere therfor we dont need to regret anything at the first place.


No one is guilty not even the bounty hunters or investors because we aint doing any crime here. Being guilty only means that you are doing something illegal or have been convicted on the court . Any people can do what they want , any one can buy and hold . Anyone can loose or earn a profit. We are all free in the world of cryptocurrency.

I don't think they are at fault for redeeming their hard earned money. I think if the project is good enough the value will surely raise after ICOs irrespective of whether bounty hunters sell off or not.

I think bounty hunters are not guilty, they're working for the projects , make the marketing becoming effective and gain the tokens from that projects.
Bounty hunters only are guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. Noone in this forum supports for using many accounts at all.

There is no criminal in the crypto money world. Bounty hunters are guilty because they mislead the market. Naturally, bounty hunters seem guilty.

Many people like to shirk these responsibilities to the people around them. Many bounty hunters are rewarding tasks to earn living expenses. Without these bounty hunter promotion projects, how do these projects attract customers? If no one invests in these tokens, how does the tokens generate value? Everyone is trying to survive. Don't blame each other!

Investors get their coins of bounty hunters. and investors get from 40 to 80% of the total pool of released tokens, and bounty hunters - 1-2% of the sold. R the above points not a proof of the fact that bounty hunters can`t affect the exchange rate of the coin?

I do not agree with that. I have noticed a trend with some investors. There are investors, who because of the bonus gotten from their investments in coins or tokens decide to drop the price in order to sell early and move over to another investment.

Some hunters begin to sell their earned tokens after entering the exchange, but the percentage of such people is small. If a project with a good idea and a team that can realize all the ideas, hunters are not a problem for the price of the token.

I don't agree on this, as we bounty hunters had just small amount of shares from the total token being distributed and to think that not all bounty hunters will dumps during first or second month from listing at exchanges. If the project have product and strong team support then this is not the issue.

maybe it's because the bounty hunters are trying to sell their tokens rewards as soon as possible when the tokens release in the market and this makes the price is getting dump so hard. I think this is not the bounty hunters mistake, they only selling the rewards to get ethereum so they can sell their ethereum to make money. I think if the tokens are really good enough to get survive in the market, then the tokens will stay in the actual price and will increase by slowly or fast.

Who said bounty hunters are guilty? I do not think this is right. Bounty Hunters make their project more known, thus attracting more investors. And the number of coins they hold is nothing compared to the investors.

Bounty hunters can't affect the price drop, as they have a very small part of the tokens and not all bounty hunters at the same time drain. The price depends only on the admins of the project. If you do not see the development of the project, then what's the point to keep the coins even to investors . The price may rise immediately if before listing a very good article or news is filed.

bounty hunters are not guilty for that matter. the thing is, many bounty hunters are selling immediately after it enters the market, but it doesnt mean that the coin will become trash or a shitcoin after that, there are some developments that the project itself must done, so their coin will increase its value. if there is no development from the developers, then that is when the investors money will put to waste.

thinking the same as me, the average bounty participant receives only 1%. but there is always news of bounty participants just ruin the market price, really unfair to me. should the project team be able to control prices in the market with attractive programs.

Suppose a coin raised 10mn dollars and out of that, 1mn was allocated to bounty hunters. Now the day the coin gets listed on any exchange, those bounty hunters will immediately sell those coins and hence causing a dump. By doing that, the price of the token would fall and investors would feel the heat and might panic. Hence, it is observed that every time a coin is listed on any exchange, the price takes a big hit and takes a while to recover.

 Why blaming each other instead of driving in one vehicle and ride in one direction for the common good of crypto. Yes it's true that some hunters dispose of their tokens immediately after receiving it, but I know that there are only a few doing that, mostly if a certain project has a good team with a reliable concept, hunters have a vision that after the reward had received, it better to hold than to dumb because they believed  a good  project comes with a good value. Both hunters and project team must exert all their best to prove that it is worth to invest in this project.

It is a fair game. Developers pay tokens to bounty hunters for work.
Bounty hunters just help projects to index in search engines and get more viral

I think that always when they say something like this - Do not take this seriously. Bounty contract has never had so many tokens to seriously affect the course.

I agree with you, most of the participants or the bounty hunters always dump their coin if the allocation f a certain program is low, they have no patience in holding their funds,Patience is the key to gain profit in this field.

The fact is that the low price of a token is justified by the presence of bounties. And the real reason is the uselessness of the project. Successful development of any platform will always have a good price. That's all.

You are wrong. Nobody owes anyone. This is the law of life. The coin on the market is falling, but you just have to wait and it will start to grow. This is a long process.

Bounty hunters are not to blame for the fact that large investors immediately sell their tokens below the ICO price. If ICO projects remove 40% discount for initial investors, then we will see much more successful projects.

this is all untrue, bounty members have a minimum percentage of tokens and it does not affect the course in any way

It's just a suggestion only. bounty hunter only received small appropriations from the whole crypto. so if it makes price falls then simply make a question. down and rise in the price depends on whether the team could make it to be developed after ICO or not.

I think the change is because of a framework change that can not be as simple as commanded by abundance seekers, they simply pause and expectation as per the guaranteed part in blessing giving, I think abundance seekers is a section that can help in the achievement of a promoting and deals venture not the same as the investors. In the abundance seekers eagerly sit tight persistently for the conveyance of tokens and coins from the organization even they are numerous who until not get paid in light of the fact that the objective isn't an objective.

I think personally if the prize hunters are not problematic unless they scam the project. I see it as a way to promote and support your favorite projects. but if it is used for people who do bad things or commit unlawful acts, but as long as we have a balanced balance between the crypto business and the workers, we do not need to use words of accusation like guilty.

Of course, most bounty hunters sell their coins and prices fall. But it's their decision. They were wasting their time

It is not possible for the bounty hunter that they are the main reason why the coin/tokens rate is low. When you see in the ico percentage, the bounty rewards got the lowest allocation. The whales that are getting good discount in the ico sale is the main reason. They only make the ico as their business, they just buy in lowest rate and sell it hard.

I think abundance seekers are not to fault, since they are strolling on track, there is definitely no impact or capacity to bring down loan costs particularly that makes token dispersion or coins be hindered, I think the change is because of a framework change that can not be as simple as ruled by abundance seekers, they simply pause and expectation as indicated by the guaranteed part in blessing giving, I think abundance seekers is a section that can help in the achievement of a promoting and deals venture. unique in relation to the investors.n the abundance seekers enthusiastically sit tight calmly for the dispersion of tokens and coins from the organization even they are numerous who until not get paid in light of the fact that the objective isn't an objective.

Bounty hunters are guilty of criminal offense. They earn money by making an Ico ad that they trust. They spend a lot of time and spend their time here.

All things considered, Im totally new so Im very befuddled. Nonetheless, I don't concur with that. I have seen a pattern with a few financial specialists who choose to drop the cost keeping in mind the end goal to offer early and move over to another venture.

yes that is true because most time wen they invest in any ICO, they will all thing the project will moon but in no time wen the token is being disbursed the bounty hunter will go dump it and the price will what no value and it decrease to what they even invest in the initials so that is it's obvious said that they are guilty.

Bounty hunters are not guilty and should not be blamed for everything that happens. Even many investors dump their tokens immediately they receive them, why is it only bounty hunters that will suffer for the blame of others.

I don't get when you say guilty.. Bounty hunters have nothing to do with price of coins or tokens they are dumping. It's all up to the investors wether they would stick with the tokes or not.

Come to think of it, percentage allocated to bounty reward are little compared to what investors have control over. I am not totally disproving the fact that bounty hunters dump coin but the blame also fall on investors whose bonuses are more than bounty rewards and can also dump since bonuses are not paid for.

The blame are always pure on hunter, it is not always true that price got dumped by disparate hunters sometime dashing out too much bonus during ico usually cause dump of price and not hunters.

A bit annoying the attitude of some bounty managers to the hunter. It's like the hunters are beggars. We don't beg for anything, but we earn honestly, observing the conditions established in the campaign rules. Fortunately, the majority of managers, adequate, and inadequate , usually don't store a lot of campaigns because to him no one comes. :D

I sincerely do not agree with this. How are bounty hunters at fault? The bounty hunters are in my own opinion even helping giving the projects and ICOs more publicity so that more investors can be aware of a particular project. If a project or ICO has got a good use case, it will speak for itself and no investor will ever blame him or herself for investing in such ICO.

Airdrop coins crypto people cannot lower price a long as most people remain scouting for snatching a good amount tokens at then cryptoexchanges. Levels reductions could remain based due to poor marketing for several starting seasons.

Don't know how they are guilty. Bounty hunters are the persons who played the greatest role in spreading about a coin a social media. So, they are doing their little job and getting paid.

Actually, most bounty hunters I have seen usually sell off their tokens when they receive their tokens and this causes massive drop in price of a project and an investor would be on deficit on his invested capital. In my opinion, its not only bounty hunters that are guilty. Also, private sale investors also sell off because they usually receive massive discounts and this makes them be in huge profit when tokens are listed.

I do not know why some people are accusing bounty hunters. I think the hunters make the project successful and only help with a small reward. Usually hunters get coins after they get investors and the project goes to the stock exchange.

Depends on the type, but I can agree.
If its social media campaigns, then I would say yes, they made it into spam.
No added value, just likes/shares/retweets/etc. or comments with broken english. This gives crypto a bad name.
I have done translations on the whitepaper. That seems like the most noble out of all, however, signature usually pays better.

I don't think anyone has blamed the bounty hunters, I think it's something investors usually dump a coin on as soon as it comes out on the exchange, if that's what you mean, like you say, if the project is good, they're going up, because revolutionary technologies always gain a lot of momentum and end up being very productive economically.

Well,  of a truth they receive just a fraction of the tokens raised, some are there that are desperate to make cash returns immediately after they receive there tokens, hence,  ready to sell at really ridiculous prices which in turn affects the market. Let us be fair for once.

Oh, it is a big mistake to think so. Most of projects do not demonstrate their real value and manipulate exchange rate. So bounty hunters do not have big influence

I think gift hunters cannot be blamed in terms of lowering rates, they only work and they don't steal or something that can harm someone

you are totally right. First of all, the hunters receive only 1-3% of the tokens that are going to be in circulation supply after the ICO. Even if all the hunter will dump all their tokens this process can't dump the token price under ico price too much. I would rather say the price dump can cause of the bad marketing and big presale percentage for the whales.

Bounty hunters are not able to affect the price effect of the development project even if the hunters sold all the tokens, this vsevolish 2%-5% Sumy pledged by the company, and not all sell 50% somewhere maximum

in any case, you are unfair to the hunters behind the Bounty. The fact is that the company's total pool of Bounty is always equal to two or three percent, which in general can not greatly affect the coin's pricing if these 3% enter the market.

Why should blame the bounty hunter? Gift hunters have the right to sell their tokens at any time, as long as they are normal and normal. All people whether hunters or investors will also sell their tokens if they really have a need.

I believe that bounty hunters do not affect the price. if the project is good, its price will initially grow and its tokens will not be thrown out to the market.

the bounty hunters usually get only the 1% of the total supply of tokens and when you calculate that there are many of bounty doers this is relatively a very small nubmber of tokens which can not affect the prices and returns anyhow in long term

I figure abundance seekers aren't risky except if they trick the tasks. I consider it to be an approach to advance and bolster your most loved venture. Be that as it may, a few people utilize peculiar strategies like spamming altcoin discussions, posting odd connections, endeavoring to trick abundance extends by doing twofold passages to various tends to so on.

Bounty hunters are also at risk. If the project fails to meet the required amount of money and fails, they will face a waste of time to work.

If you are referring to the price of ICO token after it is being added in the exchange, I think it is not right to blame bounty participants because it has only a small % of the total supply. You have to blame it on the investors that get huge amount of token in a presale. Even the dev team is also guilty for giving a huge bonus for the presale. If the token has a small bonus, those dumper will wait for the price until it reaches more than ICO price.

They are all looking for excuses during this bear market.  It seems these projects want to use the bounty hunters for free exposure.  Then when the bounty hunter succeed in getting their project talked about and they have a great ICO then the bounty hunters are evil dumpers not allowed to get paid for their work.  Lovely job isn't it.  The real reason the coin is dumping is because the project leads are dumping. Not the few scraps we hunters get. 

I think exactly the same. The bounty hunter are certainly not to blame for the whole dumps. They get only 1 or 2% of the tokens and that's not very much. I also believe that the ICO operators are more likely to dump their tokens. Most of them have the biggest part of the tokens. And even if bounty hunter dumps, they can do whatever they want with their tokens. Rather, the ICO operators should ensure that their project, after the ICO, still has a buy support for there own token by big investors or by themself.  8)

They always get free coins. They always dumped those coins and were the main cause of the tokens falling deeper

Usually people say this about hunters, when they sell your tokens are received for the bounty of the company, as this supposedly reduces the price of the tokens of the project.

I think most of us involved in bounties and airdrops are aware that we have really contributed a lot to the growth of this industry, so I see no reason to be blamed for things that are not in our hands, as the uncertainty and distrust that prevails in the market.

bounty hunter received only a few percents of the allocation alone and that I don't think it can be said the decline stemmed from a bounty hunter. I think it's a reasonable thing to happen and of course depending on the team behind it also can run or not. If indeed nice of course despite the price drops will be up again in some time.

You should not be guilty to do bounties. Bounties help the projects a  lot and that is why they organise it.

Bounty hunters helps the ICO's to promote their project, even we can get small percentage amount. So why the bounty hunter to get guilty.

Actually not the majority of ICO can provide success for investors because the problems are often faced and as investors keep trying when at the end ico has not provided maximum benefits in order to help their economy tend to be helped.

It is not true.
Maximum share of bounty hunters it is around 1% from the project's total supply. I don't think that 1% of holders are able to influence on the market price so crtically. It can happen only if project have problems with the trading volume and liquidity.

It varies a lot from bounty programs to bounty programs.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4776598.msg43128217#msg43128217

Check out the link above to find out more bounty programs.

Unarguably, bounty hunters are guilty. In a situation whereby bounty hunters get nothing less than 20k+ token from a particular bounty maybe from article writing and BTT and some other one's.  They tends to dump all this token in the market immediately it get listed on an exchanger thereby lowering the prize if not to the ground. But if we see a change of attitude of bounty hunters just like ICO's investors, I think some project whould have been great and will be doing good in the market.

Abundance seekers can't influence the value drop, as they have a little piece of the tokens and not all abundance seekers in the meantime deplete. The cost depends just on the administrators of the venture. In the event that you don't see the advancement of the venture, at that point what's the point to keep the coins even to speculators . The cost may rise instantly if before posting a decent article or news is documented.

Investors got rekt a bit and start blaming everyone including bounty hunters that have done nothing (perhaps, they blame them in those dumps after tokens distributed)

We cannot put the blame on bounty hunters 100% but they also form part of the downturn in the market by dumping their tokens early.

People blamde bounty hunters because they generally dump their coins right after getting them, after all, that means that they are devaluating their previous holdings making it drop in price.

the part of tokens sold by bounty hunters can't dump the market because of small amounts. but tokens sold by developers themselves can dump the coin till zero.

Bounty hunters are guilty? Why?  Some people think that we are spamming all around the  forum, and they want to read qualified posts, etc. But there are lots of interesting posts, lots of information which is gathered by bounty hunters and spread all over the forum. No doubts, lots of posts made by bounty hunters are not very useful, but they are very helpful for the projects. Otherwise, they wouldn't spend money and time on bounty campaigns.

Rewards supporters would not knock gains when everyone are pursuing obtaining a greater amount of cryptos on the crypto-markets. Gains drops may be facilitated on account of unstable apetite no less than quite too many introductory periods.

bounty hunters can never be guilty, any body stipulating so is so dishonest and untruthful, bounty hunters make ICOs so popular, if not for them, the so called investors wouldn't have even known about the project to start with

Bounty hunters have an impact on altcoin price drppings because many of them sell after ico at a low price. But for those who wait, the rewards are greater.

They usually say that bounty hunters are the once who dumps the value of the coin/token but I don't think it's their fault because that issue of dumping the price of a token must have been taken into consideration by the team of the project. They knew that it might happen or it is actually happening for real and they should've prepared action or solution to prevent dumping. Like this one token where I've read that they have allocated certain fund to buy back those token from bounty hunters because they knew very well that once the bounty reward has been distributed then bounty hunters will sell at once. Bounty reward allocation is just a small percentage from total coin supply so it's not that huge if they would rebuy those tokens from bounty hunters. Just my personal opinion.

I truly don't concur with this. How are abundance seekers to blame? The abundance seekers are as I would see it notwithstanding helping giving the tasks and ICOs greater attention with the goal that more financial specialists can know about a specific undertaking. In the event that a task or ICO has a decent utilize case, it will justify itself with real evidence and no speculator will ever reprimand him or herself for putting resources into such ICO.

Bounty hunters are not guilty in any way. I think bounty has been a way for ICOs to make cheap but effective promotion of their platforms and considering that bounty budgets are always between 1-3% of the total hardcap of projects, Even when bounty hunters sell off for less a good project should be able to withstand it.
I think projects that choose to give a large pool you their bounty hunters should choose to pay in ETH

No, they paid token for bounty hunter to marketing their projects. And price drop when bounty hunter flip their token. But if token have good potential, price will up again and make a profit for investors.

You know, the bounty hunter's share is only a small part of the total token, usually 2%-3%, and the team usually holds 10%-30% of the share, and the share sold to investors is usually It accounts for more than 50%, so if you look at this ratio, you know that the dumping of the bounty hunter is impossible to affect the token market price. In my opinion, it is clear that some project side shirk their responsibilities and shifting the responsibility of the token price drop to the bounty hunter.

Indeed today many blame the bounty hunter for causing the price of the ICO project token to fall far from the opening price. Although not everything is true, but it has made investors accuse it of all. So before we make an investment we must always be prepared with all the risks and not just blame the bounty hunter. Because indeed almost all cryptocurrency prices are experiencing a decline to date. Bitcoin alone takes a long time to get to the current price, so you have to be patient to be able to benefit from cryptocurrency.

Exactly, all this time there have been many assumptions that the cause of falling prices is a bounty hunter, but I think it's wrong, because the percentage of prize hunters is very small, so how can it affect the price of tokens. perhaps the assumption that always blames the bounty hunter appears because they think the bounty hunters get tokens for free so they are considered to like cheap selling

These are not fair judgments for those who engage in bounty work. The value of the labor they receive and enjoy according to different thoughts. Some people say that the bounty process is a reason for the value of the token to drop.

As well all know , the bounty program is great way to earn tokens without investing capital. Bounty hunters are the safest investors as they get tokens without getting their money involved ,though some efforts are required in their Campaigns and they are been rewarded for their Labour. Bounty Hunters contribute tremendously to the success of ICO projects, creating awareness in all social media network to ensure the success of a particular ico project. I do not find any giult in Bounty hunters .I feel without them ,it would be very hard for a Project to gain much Public recognition.

That is why i think one of the best ways possible is to reward bounty hunters with either btc or eth so as not to affect the value of a token because of dumping. Also, not only bounty hunters are responsible for dumping. In fact even investors specially the first ones who availed of the early bird discounts being offered by the project are usuallt the first ones to unload their tokens.

Why would they want to do anything bad to a campaign? They won't benefit much from doing that.

it do fluctuate but if you're are making investment thn you must be ready to accept the result but here hope not out.

I think the bounty hunters are not guilty and they only selling the rewards to get a profit. I think some of them still holding the tokens because they are sure that the token can increase higher in the future and they know that the project is good in the long-term. I think the investor take their part too when the token is released and they are selling their tokens to make a profit like the bounty hunters. but if the project is really good like I said, then the project will increase higher in the long-term.

Those people who try lovering tokens price are not bounty hunters. Bounty hunters get only 2 or 3% from all tokens which it is not so big amount. Price actually lovering people, who bought tokens in the pre-sale base. They get tokens with even 80% discount and want to sell them and fix their revenue straight away after token have been listed in exchange.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

if you meant by that is dumping ico token right after the distribution is quite right, so many bounty hunters these days dumping tokens and didn't even care the price is

This is a false statement, I see a lot of projects pay for the Bounty hunter, but their projects are still developing and profitable for investors. You should know that investors are always distributing token ahead of the bounty hunter for a long time. So do not blame the bounty hunter.

As far as I know, one of the reasons that kills the project is the investors, as well as the bounty hunters. Some says that only 1-3% will go to the bounty that's why it can't affect the token price, but the first one who would sell their token after exchange are the bounty hunters.

I do not think that bounty hunters are to blame for the fact that the bounty companies reduce rates for the week and cut the reward in 2 or more times. Blame those who change the rules and deceive us

Well I think bounty hunters are guilt of making the value of a token drop after the ico well this is because most bounty hunters on receiving their token do not hesitate to dump the token even at a low cost

It's always deepnd from the developers teams and communities, though the mass dumping out from the hunters hands may reflect somehow after reaching the exchange, but if the team have a good plan and the developers alotted some fundings to support the dumped since it's only 1-2% portions of allocations that can be tolerable if the team really ambitious to succeed.

In this case indeed bounty hunter is not fully guilty but i have to says rare to see bounty hunter had a plan to hold their tokens asset and more likely they will sold it because want instant money but the devs should be aware about this situations to keep their project still good and not lack of interest

I also feel anomalies. Hunters are always the blame for the price decline, whereas in fact, the percentage of funds allocated for hunters is only 1-5%. how can 5% make the price fall so much? this is just a reason made.

In fact, hunters are very helpful in building a community, not infrequently also hunters who act as holders

Also I think that the participants of the campaign bounty are not to blame for reducing the price of the token. A very small percentage of tokens are distributed to all participants from total emissions. They simply can not lower the price, even if they all begin to sell their tokens at the same time. But this is impossible. Half of all leave tokens in the hope of rising prices for them.

Bounty hunters can not affect the price effect of the development project. They like everyone want to make a profit. ;D ;D ;D

actually its not the bounty hunters fault, because the amount of token that the whole bounty hunters are holding is only a little percentage. and it doesnt highly affect the price of the market. if the project is really good, its price will increase even if the bounty hunters will sold their tokens.

The bounty hunters are not guilty of anything, to the extent that they have contributed in an extraordinary way to promote projects that otherwise would have had to expend important amounts of money in making their projects known. It must be taken into account that most bounties do not exceed 2% of the capital raised, which is a ridiculous amount when compared to ordinary advertising expenses, which often go beyond 50% of a company's budget.

I don't think they are guilty, they just want to support and help project promote ICO to raise funds for development in future.
They can't know exactly which ICO is legit/scam, can't know which ICO can reach caps and have profit in future.
Just need to check, test and decide to support potential ICOs and their Bounty program.
This bounty program is Legit from a real company - Organicco: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3777991.0
You can check and join it to earn free ORC tokens.

Bounty hunters are part of the community of tokens to be released on the market. and I think Hunter has an important role in the development of tokens.
Even though some weaknesses often make noise and panic, they only have 1-3% of tokens in circulation and do not affect the market too much.

Bounty hunters are the ones making the tokens/coins cheaper that it's ICO value because they are selling it no matter what is the price in the market when their bounty got into their hands. Bounty hunters should also learn the value of holding and wait for it's price to pump up at least higher than ICO price.

I wonder why you think bounty hunters are guilty.  I. Think the work of bounty hunters are very necessary in publicising a new product.  If you consider the rate of popularity bounty hunters give to projects you will understand their  importance  in project developments. 

Yes i am very agree with you. The ICO company have allocating the bounty expense to promote their ICO.
But they don't want to pay the hunters with ETH or BTC. Don't blame hunters if their token dumped by hunters because hunters need money after their works. At least the ICO company can buyback the token using the bounty expense to support their token price.

I think it's just a matter of panic. When the bounty hunter accepted the distribution of job bounty they do the price will go down, and even though it's a bit would still affect the condition as well. because many are too afraid the price would fall so it is better to sell quickly before entering the lower. This is a massive price drop and creates looks that bounty hunter as guilty in this situation. Maybe when willing to be patient and hold will be different results.

Bounty hunters are not guilty of any thing , I see this as a way of bad mounting the hard working hunters which do all required to get the token known and perform, and from the investors angle are the private buyer and pre-sale buyers that I see as a real dumper cause any time they invest huge some with bonus and once it hit exchange they dump the bag and move on to another project which is more reason we have price going down and not just the 2% of the token giving to bounty hunters that will crash it price but the like of those that have more that $10k worth with 50-40% bonus .

it's not all a bounty hounter. currently the bounty participants only get 3-5% of the total allocation of tokens and the hounter bounty sells it does not significantly affect prices. even though there is a decrease if the team is willing to pump prices I think it will definitely be the best price and will not be a severe dump. so don't blame the bounty hunter

I think there are some bounty hunters who does not really care about the project they are involve in, they earn their token through different bounty campaign with their effort, so they believe they can sell at any price. Solution here is for the team to buy them out so that there can be price stability!

I see it in different way, no matter how good the project is, at a start on exchange the price usually drops because of hunters who just want to dump and leave. Now I have one suggestion which you can see on this thread I created. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4900025.msg44128884#msg44128884

Bounty hunters can not be considered guilty of the fact that the price of new tokens, which for the first time fall on the stock exchange, is reduced. Bounty hunters are allocated only a few percent of tokens of the volume produced. As a rule, they also receive their tokens when they have already been listed on the stock exchange for a long time and have already fallen in price. The culprit in this could be a bad ICO project, the overall poor state of the market in stagnation or even lower prices, and, most likely, investors' actions to sell tokens purchased during ICO with a significant discount. It is very profitable for investors that tokens purchased at the beginning of the ICO process with a 50 or 40 percent discount immediately sell them on the stock exchange at the ICO price and, thus, receive almost 200 percent of the profits.

Yeah, I don't think that all bounty hunters are guilty. I think the price of a token depends on the quality of the project, it doesn't depend on the bounty hunter, it means if the project is good so the token price will rise, and the investors will get a profit.

Although not all bounty hunters, majority of bounty hunters are guilty of dumping tokens/coins always. They are so quick to sell these coins off just immediately they get them. It is sad because that portrays them as a littl selfish, and not caring how their decision will affect the market price of the coin/token.

Because these guys attract a lot of people who are trying to spread the project so that the project will eventually raise the necessary money for development. But in order to understand that this project is not a scam project, the bounty manager must check projects.

This is a justification for investors. If nobody wants to buy shit coins on the market, the only what remains is to blame bounty hunters

I don't think bounty hunters should be guilty for anything, bounty hunters are part of the system and the generate massive exposure for ICO projects which can't be gotten at any platform in that cheap price

Hunters get their payment from ICO by advertising them.
Most hunters sell their tokens immediately which cause the market to fall.
But lets not blame bounty participants as they did their part on making the ICO popular.

Redeem coins will be in a few years, and many investors and bounty hunters need a profit immediately. From here a large discharge of tokens on the exchange and their subsequent re-purchase at low prices.

Projects that don't support the value of their token actually deprive it of their future. Such teams are doesn't looking in the future. More danger when on the reputation the team promises to spend part of the money on liquidity and doesn't do it later.

I also have the same thoughts as you, if a good project then the price of the coin will increase, Bounty hunters they only hold a few tokens, they are not the main decision of a coin. So I think the quality of the project is the most potential. Bounty hunters are not guilty.

Bounty teams reacts accordingly on the behaviors of bounty hunters. If there are fraudulent attempts, then expect a hard response to counter such attempts. If I am a bounty manager, it would not be easy for me to handle hundreds or even thousands of applications and I would also be frustrated if I find out that a lot of these entries are frauds.

There is nothing to be guilty about for bounty hunters it all depends on the project if its a good one then there are sure to be good rewards and benefits but if not then there is nothing bounty hunters can do about

The developer are the one guilty here as they have no option than using bounty hunter to promote their project but thinking they are superior over hunters in other not to reward them on their work in bad thing that need to be correct and every hunters need to fight this , I hate seeing the clause saying they have right to take or change the rules not considering the fact that hunter also have their say but in this situation , hunters are count as fool and it is a bad image that need to be fight.

Certainly not just the bounty hunters are the main reason for the altcoin's price to go below. There are many things to consider like the usual investors that are dumping the tokens for profit raise. And also the team has a allocation also on the project ico.

This is the wrong view, ICO project development teams usually like bounty hunters. What is really sinful is not the bounty hunter, but the ICO scam team. These talents are truly sinful and they persecute the cryptocurrency market.

It is not the fault of the bounty hunters that the prices are falling after the first exchange listing. It is very easy to blame hunters for that but it is the fault of the team members that they were not able to create enough hype around the project to make people buy their tokens.

If what you said was the situation then the developer are not the one to be blame but the whole team in charge with the bounty managers and this is why I usually advice people to join a bounty project which the team are well experience because they will always put their worker feelings into consideration.

There are many factors causing the decline in value in the ICO project. But, I quite believe the statement that "bounty hunter is guilty" whether you got the statement from where. But I agree a little.
I am a bounty hunter in the article/blog. You know right? Usually, there are several managers showing bounty hunter writings in a spreadsheet. and ...... OMG, I read their writings, most of them are not content-quality and either have a significant contribution or not to the project they are reviewing. I feel like those don't. And sadly, a lot of their writing was accepted. I regret that. Indeed there are those who write well and professionally, but there are very few in number.
So, I feel that bounty hunters also have a share in reducing crypto values.
I believe the quote which says that "if we give a job to those who do not have expertise, then wait for destruction".

In my opinion, bounty hunters cannot significantly affect the price of tokens. In the couple of years that I have been watching the market, there were many examples when the project tokens were 100 times more expensive than the cost of the ICO. And look for the causes of failure in someone is the lot of the weak.

I think that totally not right, cause not all bounty participant selling their coins directly after it got listed in the market.
Some of them keeping their coins as a way of investment just like a regular investors who purchase their coins.

Correct. I hate to break it but some hunters also rely on those campaign and its hurting to know that investors are quite angry when the hunters got paid and blaming them for dump price.

If they think about it, some hunters are also investors minded and they want to earn big. Not only them, but for the case of dumpers, they deserved it since they work for it.

Bounty Hunter rated much selling coins with large numbers and this makes the price go down. but this system is certainly a freedom to bounty hunter because this is the result of work done. Perhaps many investors who feel that this is the cause of the fall in price but actually that's not entirely true.

Now many ICO projects regulate coin distribution. Some of my ICO projects followed them to send coins through stages. So for Bounty participants, this is usually the last to receive coins and it also goes through a long process. This is done so that there is no significant price reduction.

Bounty hunters are not to be blamed for anything, if a project is good ebouugh, there will always be liquidity and price will always go up. What percentage does bounty hunters get from sold tokens is insignificant. The current market is another factor and not bounty hunters.

I agree that it is foolish to blame for the low price of coins bounty hunters. After the end of the ICO and the release of the coin on the exchange, as a rule, the price decreases for some time. But if the project has a good idea and a team, you will soon see a high trading volume and the price of the coin go to the moon.

I fully agree with this statement. It will now be wrong to blame bounty hunters for problems. After all, you need to understand - only 1-3% of all tokens stand out for their share. It is unlikely that the sale of such a number of tokens can critically affect the value of the coins.

Because bounty hunters did not invest in the project and it is profitable for them to sell tokens even at a price that was at the ICO or even lower. And investors are waiting for the price to rise, to earn something.

Bounty Hunter types of blood sell them cheap on the market value and of course, this makes the coins from the ICO to be quite low and even falling from the ICO expected value. many of the investors who have complained of since ICO wish not far from expected.  might as well not completely wrong from a bounty hunter because it is the absolute of the results paid for the job is done bounty hunter.

Hunters should not take these comments personal. Someone always has to be blamed for failure. I saw many coins were  dumped
while  the hunters still not getting rewarded. Bounty allocations are ususaaly 1% of total supply so they cannot have a big influence on the coin long term. I am not saying hunters are not dumping, but it cannot have long term effect .

That's not the true reality, don't listen to anyone saying that bounty hunters are guilty because there's hundreds of hunters who will hold their coins if they think that the project is worth it. In most, the hunters would dump and sell because they came just to earn which is the bad side in the whole story.
We shall let peoples act freely, that what we call freedom.Hunters earned their rewards legally, they are absolutely right and they are free.

I have encountered such cases when project developers offered their bounty hunters the opportunity to redeem their tokens from them at the price they were at ICO stage, but such projects are quite rare. Most projects don't bother about it at all.

Although I am not a bounty hunter, I am against this view. In fact, bounty hunters are helping the ICO project, and it would be difficult to succeed without them. Otherwise, the money I lost in Ethereum could not be recovered, so I think ICO should develop vigorously. If ICO dies, I will go bankrupt.

What is really sinful is the SCAM ICO team. It is these scams that have disrupted this market and have greatly hurt investors' confidence. As for the bounty hunters, this is only a small part. They cannot make any influences marketing to the market.

I doubt that bounty hunters can greatly reduce the price if the project is good it hardly possible to reduce the price much

Why hunters should be guilty , they have done their work by promotion as well as create awareness among the people about the project. they have given their best for the project. instead we can say that some investors lower the prices by selling their investment soon but it is individual choice.

guilty for what ?  i am a bounty hunter but i never feel guilty because i dont do any bad stuffs from the campaign that ive been working with  . maybe the bounty owner are the one that should be guilty to us because they sometimes dont pay the bounty hunters despite for the efforts that have been exerted  for a long duration of time  . or the bounty manager is the other one that also be guilty because they maybe reducing our payments .

I don't think the bounty hunter is guilty. I think the reward for distributing the bounty is so poor. The income of each of us is less than 0.01 of the total profit of the event. How do we affect interest rates even if we sell these rewards?

Yes they are guilty in some ways right. But this is something very important problem and needs to be solved. The bounty hunter works for the projects social media accounts and they are doing what te admin says to them. RePosts, ReTweets or some telegram adverts. But when the ICO finishes and they get their payments they start to wait for the coin arrives to the markets, and when the coins starts to trade in first day they will sell their bounty cıins and that would drop the coins price hard. All i can recommend that the bounty hunters should have their payments late. Like after 6 months when the coin hit the market. Thats how can we stop loosing..

this is indeed not a bounty hunter's fault but because the crypto condition is in a bad condition. there is a lot of fraud in the ICO that makes investors lazy to invest and also with lots of dead coins making people more careful and holding their coins by not holding coins for too long.

if only the market and the coins they have are good then the bounty hunter will not sell their coins as soon as possible because they also want big profits like investors.
the bounty hunter is not stupid!

I have not received tokens of 3 bounties and price was dumped anyway.
That's why I don't blame on hunters, they have only a small amount of tokens to dump

I am sure that bounty hunters is the first to be arrowed is because bounty hunters get free coins not like investors where they invest with their own money.

they cannot blame the bounty hunter. Bounty hunters only sell coins that they get from their work. and that is natural. Bounty hunters only sell their coins even though the price of the coin is still below the price of ico. investors should not be afraid.

No.it is not the bount hunter were to be blame with any regularities or when the token price after getting listed will fall down. This because team had control over it when they list their tokens and some will going to take away their shares and that is why token price will drop. Just imagine that after listing the token price being drop even if bounty hunters are still.not selling their tokens. this is more on team dumping their tokens before listings.

bounty hunters are blamed indeed because most of them always lower rates from the past, and they only care about the exchange if they think the tariff is feasible they will immediately sell and go because there are many investors who are angry with bounty hunters

Don't mind these guys. How can 1% of a total supply given to bounty hunters affect the price of the token or coin? The investors themselves are the same people who dump the tokens. Some investors think we do not cherish the projects we promote but that is not true. I for instance, hodl most of the promising coins/tokens. the few bounty hunters who sell their tokens cannot be the reason why investors don't get their expected profit. they should be doing their marketing well.

For me "bounty hunters guilty" sounds like the spends on marketing are guilty for the project's fault. It's just silly. Bounty hunters don't owe anything to the project. It's just a job. The project needs promotion, bounty hunters need job. I think nobody would be against payments in BTC, ETH or even USD for the work. But most of startups just don't have any funds at the very beginning.

Don't undertaken your point quit well, but if you are referring about price dump then that is not true team and investors are guilty couped with the current market condition it not favourable for any coin.

its scam projects says like this, because if project is good - no one can lower it price or rating or other, dont mind

Because the bounty hunter will definitely sell after the token is on the market and has been distributed. That is why the price of coins or tokens is low. In my opinion, investors also influence the price of coins or tokens because they are involved in profitable sales at the beginning.

In my opinion they have no guilt. It's the fault of shit projects

Just most of the teams themselves are fraudsters and cheat employees. So it should not continue, you need to change something!

Agreed. In addition, all blame bounty hunters that they immediately drain the tokens, but very often people do not notice at what price they sell their tokens, and at the moment all ICO can only afford the price of the token in 5 - 20 times less than the stated price.

I don't think bounty hunters were responsible for the downfall of the project.Bounty hunters had help to promote the project and has spend alot of time on it.Bounty hunters will not dump their coins if they see some potential in it.They also deserve their reward that is why they can do whatever they want to do with it.

in my opinion, the bounty hunter does not affect the coin that is actually from the ico project if indeed the project is good, then it is not far from the price of ico when on the market.

The reason ICO investors lose money is not the bounty hunters. Bounty hunter spents time too for ICO success. They blame the bounty hunters for scam ICO but bounty hunters advertize the ICO too

These are the complaints so many investors have been giving and yet, they have never come up to say that other factors can also affect the price.
If the project team want to do the right thing  and to avoid unnecessary complaints, bounty participants, should be paid in coins that are already listed and already have price coinmarketcap, such as bitcoin and ethereum.

if pay using thats coins,  whether it can be a solution to the issue?
Isn't the purpose of the project also to promote their tokens, so they can be traded on the exchange.
so is it possible for them to give ethereum or bitcoin to the campaign participants' salaries?

nothing blames the bounty hunter.
and we need to understand, the allocation for bounty is only a small percentage 2-4%. and that cannot be said as a destroyer of the price of coins on the market. that's ridiculous

If someone thinks that the bounty hunters are guilty, it is a silly comment. Bounty hunters only take a very small part of the total supply of the token. Even if they receive a reward and sell it, the impact level is negligible. So pitiful.

Such conclusion came from the fact that mist of the bounty hunters are selling immediately upon receiving their rewards. It is indeed a bad move to make because they should have hold it for a but longer before selling just like what the investors are doing. But that's the fruit of their hard work and it means they can do whatever they want to, and also, such action is already happening even before so it cannot be the main reason for the continuous downfall at this moment.

I do not agree if the bounty hunter is guilty of causing the price to drop. As a bounty hunter, of course, they work to help promote the ICO to be more widely known and able to attract investors. And sometimes bounty hunters also often become investors.

It is true that majority of the bounty hunters dumping  their tokens when getting their rewards, but that cannot affect the price of the coin on long term basis as the bounty allocations are as low as 1-2%.
Investors are also dumping their tokens as they are in panic of this market situation.

All hunters get for their work in the amount of 1-3 percent of the total pool. Not everyone immediately sells or drains their coins, and certainly not at the same time) and such a small percentage of the total number of coins cannot significantly influence the course.
the guilty are usually sought by those who are themselves to blame for the failure itself

I think the bounty hunter is not wrong. But for new bounty hunters it might make some mistakes that they sell all of their tokens at inappropriate prices. Even so, bounty hunters still have a role to help promote their projects quickly. If you don't want to use a bounty, ICO can stand without any bounty campaign but the founder must promote their own project.

I'm not satisfied with your answer, Some Bounty Hunter like me does hold any coins and not selling it until price goes up. Whales should be blame on this pump and dump scenario especially when they bought below ico price and sell those.

Some events about the decline in ICO coin prices when they were only released on the exchange market were caused by bounty hunters who threw coins. But I think it's not wrong from the hunter. Because if you can observe that the allocation of tokens for this Bounty is only a little.

without a bounty hunter the project will not succeed and it is very regrettable if anyone blames the bounty hunter, if the problem of the price at the exchange depends on traders who can sell large or small volumes, it all depends on the development of coins that have good effects and continuation of coins that is

Bounty hunters receives a very small portion of the prizes. So I don't think we're guilty. Cryptocoins can't fall into this situation because of that small share.

When the price of cryptos are down sure you will only recieve small amount rewards but when it pump the bounty hunters recieve a verry high amount of profits compare to traders and investors . they are guilty because they are making a good income for free with a minimum amount of effort while other workers work too much and earn only a verry low amounts of income  .

but with the curent situation there nothing to be guilty about as a bounty hunter because their income right now is not yet big and they may even didnt get paid sometimes  not unlike to other past years where cryptos were in good condition  .

If all the projects had set themselves the task of buying back their tokens from the bounty participants, this would probably have a very good effect on the price of the token after it hits the stock exchange, but few do. And I do not know what could be the reason. Maybe it really is very few people really need.

The title is very confusing, why should the bounty hunters become guilty, they have the right on the token because it is allocated for promoting and exposing the project to all investors and bounty hunters are investors too, some of them are investing their money too, so bounty hunters should not be guilty at all.

It's very convenient to blame bounty hunters for everyone, but the percentage that projects on a payback is insignificant and can only affect the price cut shortly. I do not sell good projects, and even buy additional, that is, I invest. For me, these allegations are simply nonsense.

I believe that such accusations against them are a huge mistake. In fact, many projects do not develop and do not rise in price due to the current problems in the crypto market and strong manipulations by various speculators. Investors need to remember that bounty hunters account for only a few percent of the total budget.

This is nonsense that the price goes down because of bounty hunters. If you look at what rewards are given to advisers, then our rewards will be a drop in the ocean.The price always falls due to the wrong marketing project. And this is the main reason.

I think not all bounty hunters make the price of tokens a dump. Moreover, now the payment for bounty hunters is slowed down to maintain price stability.

If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token / coin.

I don't know in what way that bounty hunters became guilty anyway? You need to tell us here the complete details dude. due to I'm not type of a  community here that will get easily believe in the hearsay. Actually, in my assessment about in bounty hunters all of them has a big role in every campaign, without them I do believed that the ico project won't succeed for sure.

Yes, you are right companies are allocating very low funds to bounty hunters and finally people are completely blaming the bounty hunters. I hope the price will not affect with the bounty allocation, even most of the people will not dump the coins.

No, according to my opinion, the bounty share is quite small, they haven't paid at all lately. It's impossible to influence the price drop with so much share

in any case, if we take into account that the total gender for the bounty company is only 1 and 3% of the total amount of a coin, it is very funny to believe that 3% of the tokens that go on sale on the market significantly affect its pricing.

Bounty hunters are guilty because they almost instantly sell all of their rewards once it comes to exchange. But I want to tell bounty hunter guilty for promoting a scam campaign. When they promote scam project and investors lose their money, I would say bounty hunters are responsible for this.

yes as a bounty hunter i do this all the time and im not guilty . why should i be guilty if i have work hard to earn that tokens ?  i did not steal them and those are not came from scamming or from scam projects .


yes they must be guilty only if they know that the bounty is a scam but if not then its not thier fault but its the fault by the owner or the bounty manager .

bounty hunters owned only small amount tokens . investors and whales are the real one to blame here because they are manipulating the price .

Actually it is a risk that devs/teams must face when he run a project. They must understand something that is always done by bounty hunters when they get tokens from their projects.

And I think, it's a natural thing that must be understood by teams, because when bounty hunter got the token then it has being a right bounty hunter. They have a exempt to decide to sell or keep hold of the tokens they get.

Exactly, every bounty hunter will think in positive direction and start promoting the bounty campaign with lot of hopes on their mind. So nobody wants to promote the scam bounty but due to cruel team makes them to scam the investors and bounty hunters after the crowdsale.

We really need a good forum software, we are still stuck at 10 year old forum software with no update..

Lot of bounty hunters may not have enough knowledge about finding the worthy project that is why they just promoting each and every project they find on bounties section which is really helpful for scammers to create scam bounties.

Atlanta bounty was a disaster for me..
first they distributed bounty in 18 months period
than after few months, they start asking for KYC and 1 ETH amount to continue receiving bounty.

Bounty Manager should stop asking for KYC.. as this is not required for such small amount bounties

It's always a blame game for shitty projects out there. If the project has a really good potential then buyers will save the price because I have seen some projects that manage to go 10x after listing even they held a high paying bounty.

Exactly. Just a note that sometimes only 1% of the total supply are allocated in bounty campaigns while almost 50% of the total supply is for the sale purposes. So who dump first?

The thing is they should anticipate the dump as this is usual and they should have a good plan to reverse the dump, like having a sell support that controlling the sell order not lower than the ico price. That way it can protect its investors, but really you will barely to see this kind of team nowadays.

Lol! No one is forcing you to stay here.

I am fully convinced that bounty hunters cannot in any way affect the prices of coins. Indeed, in total, they receive literally a few percent of the total budget. I believe that the problem really lies in other circumstances. First of all, you need to take into account the general decline in the market and manipulation.

I disagree with your words, bro, don't blame the bounty hunter for always lowering prices on the market, because the bounty hunter is looking for rewards from the ICO program being run, I myself am a bounty hunter but have the right to sell and buy.

At first place investor will dump thier coins in order to get back thier roi. While some bounters hunters will wait atleast to 2 to 3 months because thier rewards are lock before they can trade it.

We aren't. And bounty hunters are not really after the tokens in the first place, they are after the value of the token where they can sell after listed. They are not expected to HODL for long because they are going to find another bounty again and monitoring them is hard so they quickly sell it. The investors of the ICO hold much more and they have much power to dump the price of the token and not bounty hunters.

Only few will hold but most of the bounty hunters will dump right away, if they have a good value, better for them.


Investors would dump if they feel the project has not chance to recover, but I think most will still hold.
The reason of dump is its trading volume, usually small projects are listed in small exchange also, when bounty hunters dump, smart traders will take advantage, they will remove the buy order to let the price go cheaper and in that way they can buy and hold a bit to rise.

However due to the bear market, their expectations were not met.

bounty hunter Not guilty In my opinion if the token or coin that has been entered on the Exchange then people will look for a profit as big as possible, so investors can also sell tokens or coins may be more than the bounty hunter

Only a little percent people from crypto community see that. But we're bounty hunter who actually feel that thing. I mean, we bounty hunter even get reward for free, still have strategy and wouldn't dump our coins in cheap price.

Who said we get free reward? Bounty hunters do hard work to receive a good amount of tokens. Social media bounty is just a shit of boring works. Sig campaign requires a lot of time.

As a bounty hunter we're not working our ass off for free but do the demand for the reward. Doing a task for a rewards is not free but a compensation of your work. You're right, time and effort is needed to participate in any kind of task like social media and signature campaign.

Sorry if i am wrong  ;D, maybe because i think we not use any money for do bounty campaign. If me wrong i will say my apologize. But i mean bounty hunter have strategy to sell their rewards and not just only sell it in wherever price is it.

Most projects allocate for their bounty hunters no more than 1% of the total budget. And I really do not understand how they can affect the prices of tokens. I believe that problems and price cuts are due to other circumstances. First of all, you need to take into account the manipulation and the general decline in the crypto market.

Your not wrong but you were correct . I was also a bounty hunter before and i do have a strategy  .the strategy isnt only to wait and sell my coins at a high price but also i only choose the better projects that i think will be more succesful compare to other common bounties but not all bounty hunters are like us .  Majority of the bh will only sell thier coins for easy money  but there is nothing to be guilty with it because you work hard for it .

Hope you are not experiences on investing on ICO and participated in the bounty campaigns.
You need to see the tokens listed on exchanges with the very few volume. For that time how you expect that bounty hunter unable to do any changes in the market. That listed value of tokens volume of will be lesser than that 1 percent.

Well, speaking on investing ICO I did that thing last year but I've lost them all. Some haven't listed yet and the majority of them are exit scam project which is quickly abandoned the project. We can't predict which new one on ICO's project is worth it and have the potential to earn a profit.

Price is always all about supply and demand since the first exchange of goods happened. When you have knowledge of this simple microeconomic principle thoroughly explained by Adam Smith in the 18th century, then everything becomes clear. Now in every equation there are variables. What you have to focus on are these variables. For example you do know that bounty hunters will obviously dump massively not caring about trading, candles or waiting to sell at a higher price. I myself sold for ETH and BTC almost all coins I earned from bounties and I was right about it 99% of the times.
Why was that? Basically because there was no actual demand for these coins (I'm talking about hundreds). I did trading and doubled and trippled up a few of these tokens and then dumped them again, trying to double my profit, when it was obvious that the teams behind stopped supporting the price. So when the only factor that supports the price is the project itself or the exchange bots, then the volume is weak, the demand is weak and price will most certainly dive to zero.

Most ICO's, once listed, they did a few pump and dumps. All were manipulated by the teams and by the exchanges to catch a few dollars from the remaining traders. You have to realize how this works. The price can't grow in long term, unless there is real demand by investors. 2017 canot be repeated this year. In 2017 people made 20x of their initial investment and were able to extend into investing in ICO's and other obscure projects that were obvious scams. In 2018 I doubt there was even one decent project that listed on an exchange and actually had demand and price growth.

A variable into the equation is the exchanges the projects want to get listed and the passion/commitement of the developers. Once you see a project trying hard to get listed at Latoken (no offence but it is a small exchange right now) you know there won't be demand for it and price will stabilize at 1-2% of the ICO price. Now there was a project (Vanta) that was trying to get listed in Upbit exchange (a respectable Korean exchange). This one although I sold my tokens I'll be probably buying in again as the team is commited and supportive of the project and don't care about short term price fluctuations.

So these are the main factors to consider about price and not blame the bounty hunters for actually getting paid for the work they did. Bounty hunters are not traders. It is a job for them and remember that most of the times they don't even get paid for it.

It is not fair for those involved in bounty (bounty hunter). It is reprehensible that the reward placed on airdrop or bounty always accounts for 1% of the total token. Unfortunately, they only blame bounty hunter for breaking their project without thinking that it is a general situation and it depends on the whole problem in the crypto market.

Well, if you'll excuse me dude, honestly, I have a question in mind that I don't exactly understand that in what way in which bounty hunters become guilty? Because as far as I know, all bounty hunters here who join in every campaign project they give help actually most of the time, and sadly most of the time bounty hunters also became the no.1 poor because every time there is a scam project bounty hunters are the main victim by it though the investors was also a victim. So meaning, out of 100% perhaps 90% of the bounty hunters gave the contribution to promote the project campaign and became successful in the end and sometimes the owner blame the bounty hunters if the project fails.

There are a lot of ICOs that almost be dead project. Leave investor in market until it get delisted because don't have volume in there. This thing always happen even there are bounty campaign or not.

Correct. So bounty hunters are not guilty really, they dont do aything illegal. They are just becoming participants in the ICO project and thus they support it. And the project is compensating them for being part and for helping. if someone cant understand this then he needs to rethink what exactly the hunters are doing. Also the bounty hunters, and the ICO projects openly show that they are running bounty campaigns..

As a bounty hunter, I don't see that we are guilty. In what anyway that we become like that?
Being a bounty hunter, all we wanted is to get profit through joining in any of the bounty campaign that will rise
in this field of crypto business.

in what part they can tell that we bounty hunters are guilty? The campaign should thank us for helping them to attract investors by posting good about the campaign in different social media sites