Bitcoin Forum

can you explain to me why you are giving negative trust? how do you connect it to the trade for sending and receiving merit? How do you know I sent merit for ico? Did you  give negative trust for me and just a few people in the title because it's mentioned “ merit for ico “ ?

I want to know the answer to a problem from the members.

is it  fair that a negative trust is given to me for sending and receiving merit to a member?

if this is a justifiable case, why is lauda and lauda's smarmy not punished?

Is anyone else finding daily new threads about Lauda almost as tedious as the daily new threads about merit?

Look dude your smerit received is look like very suspicious almost in local board post.
I viewed your summary smerit recieved all of these was higher amount of smerit just like you received 40 smerit.
Well, i didn't say that you abused merit system but i think your too much have smerit with in a single day,
so, we could NOT blame mam lauda if that what she thinking of and she give you a negative trust. ::)

Yeah that was in my mind too. :) :)

Context since OP is dishonest: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2964183.0. More importantly:


Witch hunt.

so ? There is only 3-4 person in the title have received a negative trust. do you think that anyone who gives a high rate merit send and receive to each other is punished in this case?

If you have taken the same amount of merit continuously from the same people, then you are not counting on this fault ? is it forbidden by the forum to people send and receive merit each other ?

I'm gradually working on it. I'm not a robot, I'm a cat.

---

Sigh. You're an idiot.

you should find better things to do to yourself, I can say as a doctor your mental and emotional situation is really bad. I feel sorry for you . i hope god helps you.

i also reveal the your real personal character ,now everyone is seeing how you are. You insult me ​​while I offer you good wishes from God

A doctor would never say something like this. Stop lying.

Lauda is un-stahp-able.

https://i.imgur.com/YLiIR4J.jpg

if u want the prove send me private message

So, speaking as a physician, would you say it's ethical to publish a professional opinion regarding the mental health of a person whom you haven't examined and who hasn't authorised you to make such a statement?

I did not insult to anyone . I told my opinion professionally. If you have seen the photos, I can remove them now. I do not have to prove to anyone my job

by the way If you do believe that is not  the god of the forum, you can see the realities. you do not even have to be a doctor for it

How about we question the ethics of taking a photo of an anaesthetised patient without their consent, and posting it online, again without their consent.

can u see the patient face if u see you right . you just seen surgery team

I know the procedures. be comfortable in this regard. there is not non ethic situation

'I'm just going to take your picture real quick so that I'll win this argument over me trading merits at Bitcointalk.'

Also, how about the ethics of being so preoccupied with Bitcointalk merits as to focus on that while delivering anesthesia.

I don't know which country you work in, but in my country that is a breach of both confidentiality and consent, and you would be disciplined for it.

How about we also discuss the fact that you are engaged in an argument on a forum when you are supposed to be looking after a patient? Your messy anaesthetic machine, including an opened but not drawn up vial, discarded needles, a disconnected laryngoscope, a variety of unlabelled syringes and an APL valve screwed down despite the fact you are on the ventilator (generally shoddy technique), suggests you are not good enough to multitask. I suggest you pay more attention to your job.

I have the necessary care and consideration. If I send you my statistics now, you will surely find something to tell me.  It is not my real purpose to be out of the way, but I think you are the follower of lauda.

its fine to me . already everyone seems to be on lauda’s side. insulting lauda but guilty  its me i guess

I have had next to zero direct interaction with Lauda. Right now I'm more concerned about the safety of your patients.

dont be . everything is under my control

Thank you for your thoughts

A real Doctor and/or an anesthesiologist would not have this much time in the world to spam this forum with such BS.

Please dont lie about your education or your skills - people like you make the real doctors look like douchebags. They are far too busy handling their real lives and their professional lives and they dont have time to troll in the forum and open a thread like this and keep bumping it with every baseless crap that they can find out.

Also it does not matter who you are. You actions and the way you interact with people here makes what you are - in the internet and this forum - which you already have ruined on your own.

Wow what a scumbag. That is terrible form, invasion of privacy over Something so petty as an internet squabble, you are a douche and Lauda is correct

Quoted for irony.

I'll just leave this image here. Hypocrisy is Lauda's highest quality

https://i.imgur.com/Yj0vldo.png

That was my first thought, especially an anesthesiologist who presumably would be in very high demand--but you never know.  There are many different birds in the forest, and it could happen. 

I'm not throwing in my support to this guy, nor have I ever worked in an operating room, but those needles and vials wouldn't look out of the ordinary to me.  Most of the syringes look labeled, and as far as that ampoule that's opened, they may have only drawn up what they needed and what you see is overfill that hasn't been disposed of yet.  I have worked in hospital pharmacy, and we'd routinely leave ampoules out so the techs would know what drug was in what IV bag or syringe. 

As far as OP's sins go, I'm on the fence about how merit abusers should be tagged.  There are fairly obvious cases where merit has either been bought or is being traded or is being sent to alt accounts, but a lot of cases aren't obvious.  And I personally wouldn't put merit trading in the same category of account selling, shitposting, or scamming.  I think it's a problem that is limited in how bad it can get by the scarcity of merits themselves.  But as I've said before, I fully respect members like Lauda and actmyname for tagging people they think are abusing the system.  And I can tell OP that however many threads you start, or however loud you yell about this, Lauda probably isn't going to remove that feedback, so get used to it.

Fortunately OP has an excellent career to fall back on and isn't dependent on anally raping bitcointalk for his livelihood.

Answer is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2973511.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2973511.0

Atleast I seen a doctor on this forums, could you recommend any Tablets or neurologist?

You are a cheat., telling people to invest in nasty then telling the same people it's a charity at a later date.. you are being exposed as a douche just like OP here.. just be quiet little man

Stop crying around you pussy!!!

For the on poster I got this thing by searching in this forums how Trust system works?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust

Currently Lauda has 0 and i think 1 or 2 more negatives for stopping the RED MARK. I am not sure,m but as per my guess from the list, hope someone will correct it.

The rules don’t apply to lauda and his cronies. I would think this would be more than obvious by now.

Oh God, this thread is full of lauda's fans and ass massagers.

Lauda is a faggot with some stupid smelly cats!

Ass massagers. Good one

Black white fallacy
Split ass-kisser and victim
Not true discussion

I will answer the question in a logical approach. When the person is thirsty, she will drink. Then solved the problem. There will be an enough reasons why it was given. Personally, I don't know Luada but one thing for sure I don't know everything about her only name and how she deals to this forum.

You definitely feel bruised.

How would you know that a doctor wouldn't do that? Except you are one yourself or you easily seek recourse to the fallacy of hasty generalization in discourse.


Come on guys, don't you understand the place of sarcasm in word play? OP, probably meant a witch doctor. And yes, as a witch doctor he has the privilege to make his findings public.

Come on Mpamaegbu, we should not be trying to find ways to give any kind of credibility to OPs (whether that be attempting to find humor or not) who either come out with a thread whining and trying to impugn the reputation of another member for selfish reasons. 

Accordingly, we should not be giving any benefit of the doubt to OP's status assertion that s/he/it is a "doctor" which implies medical doctor and/or someone with psychiatry expertise.

So, even if the whole situation is funny, it is NOT.   

Just give Lauda negative trust, with reference where it message has a border condition.

You have to understand, that it has to workout all those BTC it put into this forum, when BTC was cheap.

In reality you should not be worried about this trust, everything about crypto is trustless!

Nobody can punish the punisher. I have heard a lot of negative about Lauda, but I doubt that the advice about giving her negative trust will succeed, because of in the case that if it would be possible this person would be out of the forum long time ago.

Right to the point. Quarreling Launda is actually proving him/ her right for giving you a negative trust.  I would make more sense for you to calmly explain your point and avoid insults and quarreling.

That would be an abuse of the Trust system. Trust is subjective and one should not give a trust rating to someone simply because they hate them. I understand you all hate Lauda so much that you fell you should give them some trust "in return" - however the fact is that people have been busted for a reason and thus Lauda's rating are backed by evidence, while yours are baseless bullcrap.

Obviously trust is subjective and nobody is trustworthy - still you are nothing but a butthurt mobstar.

Wrong. There are DT members who were removed from DT for being involved in shady activity. Giving Lauda negative from you people will have no effect except that you all will see Lauda's account painted red but not for other people in the forum.
There is clearly no reason for Lauda to waste their time here commenting and/or try to argue a point.