Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: xtraelv on May 30, 2018, 08:31:28 AM



Title: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on May 30, 2018, 08:31:28 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies.
Post by: freesia_pnp888 on May 30, 2018, 11:20:44 AM
thank you for such a detail post summary about him. i still imagine that he's asian and middle age now but who knows.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies.
Post by: xtraelv on May 30, 2018, 02:12:37 PM
Some more less likely theories:

https://i.imgur.com/n4K6uGu.png

Satoshis missing posts:

Here are those posts of his from the Staff forum that may be interesting. I'll paraphrase non-Satoshi posts where necessary for the posts to make sense. Note that he never actually said "bitcointalk.org" -- this appears due to automatic text substitution by the board.

I left the admin account set to the original SMF theme so if I somehow completely wedge the custom theme I can still get in to fix it.

I've got a neat little 12x12 coin image to replace those pip stars with.  Should look nice.  Also some nice button images to try.

The registration page has "hide your e-mail address" unchecked by default.  I must fix that in php before we can open up.

The Announcements forum is currently moderator access only.

12x12 coin for pip stars done.

Registration page "hide your e-mail address" checked by default done, haven't tested it yet.

Sirius: Let's get a proper SSL certificate
I think I could receive @bitcoin.org, but I'd rather procrastinate on this and work on other things first.  Is there a reason we need this sooner?
Sirius: All internal links are pointing to https, so everyone always gets an SSL warning.
I didn't know all the forum links point to https.  I always use https so I wouldn't have noticed.  SMF is supposed to detect and give you the same as what you've got.  If you're on an http page, then all the links should also be http.  If that's not working then I need to fix it.
OK, the problem was that $boardurl was switched to https://www.bitcoin.org/smf again.  It's supposed to be http://bitcointalk.org and the software will replace http with https as needed.  It always assumes the base $boardurl is http.  It can't switch it in the other direction.

$boardurl is "Forum URL" under:
Under Admin->Server Settings->Core Configuration

The cause of the problem is that the default fill-in for "Forum URL" is the cooked $boardurl, with https in it.  So, if you are logged in with https, it fills it in with https, so if you submit that page as is, you change it to https.

It's an accident waiting to happen if you ever submit that page without changing the https to http each time, that happens.

I switched it back to http, please doublecheck that all the links are now http if you're using the forum as http.

I don't have time to fix the admin page right now so it's not an accident waiting to happen.

It would be nice if the forum could be at www.bitcoin.org/forum/ instead of www.bitcoin.org/smf/ but that's a whole nother thing.  Would you be in favour of that change?  If we want to do that, I should do it because I already know where all the path settings are and how to do it, since I had to figure all this stuff out the first time there was the Forum URL https/http problem.  There are other urls under Admin->Themes and Layout.  I think if a mirror directory forum -> smf was created, it would be possible to change the urls in the admin interface without the forum software stopping working.



Is there any reason to have e-mail confirmation?

If you're doing that out of spam concerns, I've already got that covered.  I made some customizations to the registration HTML so any spambots designed for SMF won't be able to figure it out.  The CAPTCHA image URL requires an extra parameter, and there are 3 different CAPTCHA images, but only one shows because the others have stuff like width=0 height=0.

Twice I've seen reports of Live Protection causing initial block download to stall out early.
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=305

Just brainstorming here how this could happen.

Someone saying they got 513 or 1001 blocks before it stalled, yet they report having 10 connections.  The person had port forwarding, and must have since this is Windows and outbound from windows is limited to 8, and they had 10 connections.  With port forwarding usually you'd have more than 10, but if IRC was blocked, I could see how inbound would be a lot more limited like 10.

Seems like Live Protection is allowing connections to be made, but keeping them silent.  Or maybe only allowing a little data to go out but not much, which is strange.  Maybe it doesn't want to block outbound requests like browser page requests, which are less than 1K or so, but it wants to shut down large data transfer, so it stops it after just a little bit of data like the size of a URL.

If IRC is blocked, you typically do get like 501 or 5?? or 1001 blocks at first from the seed node.  You connect to a seed node, get the address list, then disconnect from the seed node but it usually slips in one or two block requests before the disconnect, hence around 500 or 1000 blocks.  If Live Protection zombies all further connections, that would give the result the guy got.  Maybe it zombies all inbound connections, and after the first seed node, the inbound connections came and gave him 10 connections so he didn't connect outward anymore, so it's all inbound connections.

That seems to fit what happened the best.  IRC blocked by Live Protection.  The node connects to a seed node, gets roughly 500 or 1000 blocks, broadcasts inbound IP address to the net, disconnects seed node, doesn't get any more outbound connections before the inbound connections give him 10 connections and it stops looking for outbound.  Now all his connections are inbound, and maybe Live Protection zombies the inbound, letting them connect but not letting any data through (or only one direction).  He doesn't get the usual 50 or so connections because he's not visible on IRC.

I still don't see a pegged thread about Microsoft Security Essentials Live Protection.  Someone needs to write a thread telling people if they have Microsoft Security Essentials how to exempt or whatever bitcoin.exe and pin it ASAP.  I'm really busy, surely someone else can do this?!!

I'm adding this to the readme.txt of the 0.3.1 release:
If you have Microsoft Security Essentials, you need to add bitcoin.exe to its
"Excluded Processes" list.

Kind of a blind guess because I don't have it so I can't look exactly what it says, but going on what others have said.

Here's another case:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323.0
I used that link to write the following in the readme.txt:

If you have Microsoft Security Essentials, you need to add bitcoin.exe to its
"Excluded processes" list.  Microsoft Security Essentials->Settings tab,
select Excluded processes, press Add, select bitcoin.exe, OK, Save changes.

Is there anything else we should do?  Maybe a link on the lower part of the homepage like "If you have Microsoft Security Essentials, see these instructions to add bitcoin.exe to the Excluded processes list."

You shouldn't chat in the #bitcoin room.

Do you think it'll gravitate toward #bitcoin-dev on freenode or lfnet?  freenode's the better choice because you may get noticed by other people on freenode.

Does anyone want to take over management of the .po files?

You would monitor the translation forum when translators come along with .po files.

The job is basically what I've been doing with them, which includes editing the .po file as a text file to fix up spacing, using poedit on it to update the strings from the latest sourcecode and maybe fixing up anything the automatic update got wrong, generating the .mo file.  Edit their e-mail address out of the header, put their forum name instead.  Need to know how to use SVN.  Attach the .po file back to the person so if they make any more changes they can go from the edited version.  Would make more sense for a non-developer since you don't need any development skills for this.

Gavin: Is there a DoS attack on the network happening now?
I'll take a look a the logs.

It could be someone's server farm all starting at once.

There have been some issues with garbage addr messages in previous versions.  Not saying that's the problem now, just want to make you aware.

In 0.1.5 there was a bug where a socket could get closed twice, which (maybe only on linux) could end up closing another random socket that could get reopened by IRC.  If that node was in the middle of receiving an addr message, IRC content could be converted into addr messages.

0.3.0 ignores addr messages from 0.1.5, but a 0.2.0 node could relay it.  I don't think there are any 0.1.5 nodes left anymore though.

In 0.2.9, I added a checksum to the message headers so no unintended messages can get into the system.  The new verack message is part of the version negotiation used to switch to the new header.  I'm embarrassed that I didn't do this originally, but I thought TCP already does that.

I have seen addr messages that are made of other addr messages shifted by 3 bytes.  I added some filtering in 0.2.9 for that in net.h.  The comment there explains how a 3-byte shift might happen if just the right bytes are garbled.

Garbage addr messages always have something else in the pchReserved field, so no nodes actually try to connect to the garbage addresses.

These problems should improve as more 0.2.0 nodes upgrade. 

0.2.0 obsoletes on 20 Feb 2012.  0.3.0 nodes will require the checksum header on that date and refuse to talk to 0.2.0 nodes.

I looked at the logs.  It looks like it's just heavy addr traffic.  I only saw a few garbage addresses, it's mostly well formed addresses.

There's much too much addr traffic though.  I'm making adjustments to quiet it down.

I added some code in 0.3.0 to limit the amount of addr messages, but the limits were pretty loose.  I'm limiting it down much more in 0.3.2.  In 0.3.0, it only sent to 10 other nodes, but those 10 nodes changed every hour, so you could have the same addr going around every hour.  In 0.3.2 I'm lowering it to 4 nodes and every 12 hours.


I suspect the reason e-mails from bitcoin.org such as the validation e-mail from the wiki are getting spamblocked is because we didn't have e-mail validation turned on for the forum, so maybe spammers used the forum to set their e-mail to people they wanted to send spam to and then PM themselves so it would e-mail there.  The only way to really know would be to look at the mail server logs and see if there's a large volume and what it is.

I turned on e-mail validation of new accounts on the forum, but now people can't sign up because the validation e-mail gets spamblocked.  Someone said gmail is one case.

So here we are, nobody new can sign up to the forum.

It would help if we could turn off the forum's notification e-mail features.  I tried to disable what I could, but it only had settings for forum thread notifications.  Can someone tell me if PM notifications are still active or any e-mail notification anywhere else on the forum.

Maybe we should disable the forum's access to the e-mail server entirely, then turn off registration e-mail until we work this out further.  I don't know where that setting is in the SMF interface.


Gavin: I've unstickied the "Post your Static IP" thread
Good, it really isn't needed anymore.  The old IP's listed aren't known to have -allowreceivebyip so they're not much use, and we're downplaying the send-by-IP option anyway.  Laszlo's IRC allows TOR users, and also they can get seeded with the seed nodes, so it's not needed for that anymore either.

grondilu deleted the whole "What will governments do against Bitcoin?" thread, which had diverged more into a philosophical debate about politics.

I removed the "Remove own topics" permission for regular users.  I didn't know they could do that.  It would be OK if it only deleted if it only has your own posts in it, like if you accidentally posted in the wrong place.

At the same time, I enabled "Move own topic". 




Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: sebastianAndrei on May 30, 2018, 02:23:41 PM
Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
Developed the code for bitcoin and founded bitcointalk.org.
He used an e-mail address and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0

His writing is clean, with few typos
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai,

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.


Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0  Most comprehensive list of suspects.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0 Marti Malmi

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0 Hal Finney
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0 Nick Szabo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0 Mike Hearn

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0 Michael Clear

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0 Craig Wright
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0 Craig Wright “Mr Fake”

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0 Julian Assange

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id% Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422 Adam Back

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all  Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617 Conspiracy theories
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0 Even a fake Satoshi replied
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.


Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  

I've also seen some documentary movie and some article regarding who's the real satoshi nakamoto but noone claim who he really was.

There many speculations and conspiracy who he really was but noone can ever see or konw who he really was even the fbi and cia don't know

who he was. Maybe the governemnt or those in power conceal who satoshi really was.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Queen12 on May 30, 2018, 02:25:25 PM
It doesn't matter who Satoshi is. :o :o
What's important is that he brings us blockchain technology and bitcoin, which is good for the whole world.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: AGD on May 30, 2018, 02:37:46 PM
Er, why is Dave Kleiman not on this list? He was Satoshi with the highest probability.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on May 30, 2018, 11:01:29 PM
Er, why is Dave Kleiman not on this list? He was Satoshi with the highest probability.

Added to the list and added you as a source. Here is a good post that debunks that theory: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506

I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. I quite like the mystery.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: AGD on May 31, 2018, 10:10:23 AM
Er, why is Dave Kleiman not on this list? He was Satoshi with the highest probability.

Added to the list and added you as a source. Here is a good post that debunks that theory: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506

I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. I quite like the mystery.

Check: https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: avikz on May 31, 2018, 10:22:40 AM
Thank to OP for putting such an enormous effort to put together this thread. However, I believe the community respects Mr. Nakamoto for his invention but they are not interested to know who the person really is! Because bitcoin is a revolution and for every revolution to take shape and to shake the world, the propagator must stay safe! Otherwise the revolution is bound to fail. If, by any chance his real identity is established, do you think the enforcement agencies will let him live his life peacefully?

Can we reach a consensus here to stop finding who the Satoshi Nakamoto is and let him live his life peacefully?? He needs respect and not the investigation on his real identity!


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on May 31, 2018, 10:54:40 AM
Thank to OP for putting such an enormous effort to put together this thread. However, I believe the community respects Mr. Nakamoto for his invention but they are not interested to know who the person really is! Because bitcoin is a revolution and for every revolution to take shape and to shake the world, the propagator must stay safe! Otherwise the revolution is bound to fail. If, by any chance his real identity is established, do you think the enforcement agencies will let him live his life peacefully?

Can we reach a consensus here to stop finding who the Satoshi Nakamoto is and let him live his life peacefully?? He needs respect and not the investigation on his real identity!

That is also my viewpoint. I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.
It is better to focus on his writing rather than his identity.  It is quite obvious that he was very concerned about privacy. His association with the cypherpunks proves he was deeply concerned about privacy.

There are also some other very smart people who were involved in the creation of bitcoin and some of them lurk on bitcointalk.

It is also quite possible and quite likely that he was involved in Government level work and divulging his identity might have caused serious issues for him.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinNewbie15 on May 31, 2018, 11:25:49 AM
Thank to OP for putting such an enormous effort to put together this thread. However, I believe the community respects Mr. Nakamoto for his invention but they are not interested to know who the person really is! Because bitcoin is a revolution and for every revolution to take shape and to shake the world, the propagator must stay safe! Otherwise the revolution is bound to fail. If, by any chance his real identity is established, do you think the enforcement agencies will let him live his life peacefully?

Can we reach a consensus here to stop finding who the Satoshi Nakamoto is and let him live his life peacefully?? He needs respect and not the investigation on his real identity!

That is also my viewpoint. I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.
It is better to focus on his writing rather than his identity.  It is quite obvious that he was very concerned about privacy. His association with the cypherpunks proves he was deeply concerned about privacy.

There are also some other very smart people who were involved in the creation of bitcoin and some of them lurk on bitcointalk.

It is also quite possible and quite likely that he was involved in Government level work and divulging his identity might have caused serious issues for him.

Satoshi definitely deserves his privacy. He gifted us Bitcoin, and if he wants to remain anonymous, he should! Besides, I'm pretty sure a few governments would like to have a talk with him if he was identified...


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on May 31, 2018, 01:59:53 PM
Er, why is Dave Kleiman not on this list? He was Satoshi with the highest probability.

Added to the list and added you as a source. Here is a good post that debunks that theory: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506

I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. I quite like the mystery.

Check: https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93


https://youtu.be/NCRh6zzWnVY (https://youtu.be/NCRh6zzWnVY) Craig Wright interview.

Craig Wright is not Satoshi. He has a temper that would have shown at some stage of the writings.
I think he and Dave Kleiman have mined a lot of blocks but I think he has lied to the estate.
In my opinion his evasiveness, temper and broken promises are classic signs that he doesn't have the evidence to back up his claims and is not telling the full truth.

Even if Kleiman was Satoshi - I don't think Wright has got the private keys.

A lot of the claims made by Wright were made in 2011 before people were actively tracking bitcoin addresses and a lot of his claims are demonstratively false.

Technically it doesn't matter whether you defraud for $1 million or $1 billion - the punishment is the same. The notoriety is more if it is for $1 billion.

I'd love to see some more emails written by Kleiman. That Wizsec article also doesn't believe Craigs stories. https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Satoshi definitely deserves his privacy. He gifted us Bitcoin, and if he wants to remain anonymous, he should! Besides, I'm pretty sure a few governments would like to have a talk with him if he was identified...

Even if I knew who he or she was I wouldn't out them publicly.  But speculation will never stop. But I'd hate it if a fraud is identified as the real Satoshi.

This thread is a consolidation of all the theories. Logical, imagined and just plain goofy.

While their identity may never be known, Satoshis writing is his real legacy.



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 05, 2018, 04:30:57 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png

Added extra details about Satoshis email being hacked and used to threaten theymos.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Pursuer on June 05, 2018, 04:42:36 AM
I opened this topic expecting one of those poorly repeated topics talking about Satoshi for the millionth time but I was surprised to see this nice compilation of all the theories so far. it was merit worthy.

I specifically like the "Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola" thing :D


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 05, 2018, 10:41:20 AM
I opened this topic expecting one of those poorly repeated topics talking about Satoshi for the millionth time but I was surprised to see this nice compilation of all the theories so far. it was merit worthy.

I specifically like the "Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola" thing :D

Thank you for the compliment. I did try to consolidate as many theories as possible. The recent Kleiman developments are interesting.
If Kleiman was Satoshi then it will still take years to play out through the courts. A Satoshi million bitcoin selloff will mean cheap bitcoin for a while.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: stayeduptolate on June 06, 2018, 12:45:43 PM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.

Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Adam Back, Charles Bry, David Chaum, Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Nick Szabo, Marti Malmi, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Mike Hearn, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Julian Assange, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang, Ross William Ulbricht, Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos, Craig Steven Wright, Dave Kleiman.

IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?



Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0 The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him.
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0  Most comprehensive list of suspects.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0 Marti Malmi

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0 Hal Finney
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0 Nick Szabo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0 Mike Hearn

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0 Michael Clear

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0 Dave Kleiman
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506 Not Wright or Kleiman (good post)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0 Craig Wright
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0 Craig Wright “Mr Fake”

Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0 Julian Assange

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id% Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422 Adam Back

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all  Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0

Conspiracies:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617 Conspiracy theories
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi

Frauds:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0 Even a fake Satoshi replied
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740 (another fake Satoshi)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate lawsuit against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638)
All I heard about SATOSHI NAKAMOTO is that he is the inventor of bitcoin, the largest crypto currency among all and now considered as a boon in today’s world. Though he is imaginary and hypothetical yet because no one has saw him ever . He has Twitter and other accounts where he use to communicate with bitcoin user and get their bitcoin experiences but no one has ever met him, I don’t think he is a fraud or something all I know is that he is the good father of bitcoin Nd I want to meet him once in my life.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: atliens99 on June 06, 2018, 12:47:27 PM
I read a quite hilarious article on the possbility of Satoshi being an Artificial Intellgience robot.  apparently bitcoin was careated by this robot so it could eventually take over the entire world :)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: carlisle1 on June 06, 2018, 01:30:52 PM
This post is month late from birthday celebration last april 5 lol

But you have lots of intelligence work here to get this details,though not so truthful but theres some fact that this have some link and that samsung ,toshiba,nakamichi and motorola sounds interesting,ill go deep about some of your points here,google will be used again for this 😂


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 07, 2018, 01:53:52 PM
I read a quite hilarious article on the possbility of Satoshi being an Artificial Intellgience robot.  apparently bitcoin was careated by this robot so it could eventually take over the entire world :)

You might be referring to this one ?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence




This post is month late from birthday celebration last april 5 lol

But you have lots of intelligence work here to get this details,though not so truthful but theres some fact that this have some link and that samsung ,toshiba,nakamichi and motorola sounds interesting,ill go deep about some of your points here,google will be used again for this 😂

I don't have strong opinions about it  - I really would like to reflect as many opinions and viewpoints as possible so readers can make their own conclusions.

The post is far from finished - I've got a lot of cleaning up and adding more links - to do on it.

I think if Satoshi wanted to be found he / she would have made it obvious or make it obvious in the future. Any good links and discussions will be linked to in the original post.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Kakmakr on June 07, 2018, 02:23:13 PM
Satoshi transcended to the next step in the evolution of Bitcoin, which is ALL Bitcoin users becoming the NEW Satoshi Nakamoto. WE are now Satoshi Nakamoto. It is our duty to hide his identity, because his identity is protecting our investment. Once his identity is revealed, all HELL will break lose.

Criminals will try to get their hands on his coins and governments will prosecute him for whatever reason they might conjure up to throw him in jail. People might be disappointed, once they realized who he/she is and they will dump their coins.  ::)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: ryan1918 on June 13, 2018, 07:20:26 PM
I agree the government will try to get him for whatever they can so he could not reveal himself at any time.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 16, 2018, 02:20:22 AM
I agree the government will try to get him for whatever they can so he could not reveal himself at any time.

http://bitcoinist.com/cia-doesnt-deny-files-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/

Just in the news today....


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: AGD on June 16, 2018, 11:15:19 AM
I agree the government will try to get him for whatever they can so he could not reveal himself at any time.

http://bitcoinist.com/cia-doesnt-deny-files-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/

Just in the news today....

Not sure if they needed stylometry to identify SN. It would be easier to use XKeyScore and some 0-days I guess. They definitely could be interested in identifying SN at some point (maybe about this time: http://gawker.com/the-underground-website-where-you-can-buy-any-drug-imag-30818160 and https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Schumer-Calls-on-Feds-to-Shut-Down-Online-Drug-Marketplace-123187958.html )


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Kimchu kuno on June 16, 2018, 12:08:43 PM
Satoshi transcended to the next step in the evolution of Bitcoin, which is ALL Bitcoin users becoming the NEW Satoshi Nakamoto. WE are now Satoshi Nakamoto. It is our duty to hide his identity, because his identity is protecting our investment. Once his identity is revealed, all HELL will break lose.

Criminals will try to get their hands on his coins and governments will prosecute him for whatever reason they might conjure up to throw him in jail. People might be disappointed, once they realized who he/she is and they will dump their coins.  ::)

In my own understanding why we are suspecting Satoshi Makamoto doing fraud and conspiracies hes invention helps the world economy to grow his not forcing the community to adopt and used it our own self presented to joined this network upon joining this technology we don't know his real identity that means  his privacy remain  whatever the outcome of his invention successful or down we should respect him because we have a little share of his legacy.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: cxmyifan16 on June 16, 2018, 12:13:19 PM
The true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is the main mystery of Bitcoin. And not only because the creator of the most successful currency experiment in the world remains anonymous after almost six years. Another reason is that the growth of bitcoin's price made him extremely rich.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: FrueGreads on June 16, 2018, 03:08:45 PM
Have you reported this to CIA or the FBI already? That looks like very valuable information and it could help them find him. On the other hand, maybe you should try to delete all this information.

I think you are on the right path, but since Satoshi was the creator of bitcoin, and we all thank him for that so maybe we should try to not help in the discovery of his identity as a token of appreciation. If you don't let this one go, you will probably ruin bitcoin, Christmas and very important companies in our society. Some things are better left hidden.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 23, 2018, 01:18:45 AM
Have you reported this to CIA or the FBI already? That looks like very valuable information and it could help them find him. On the other hand, maybe you should try to delete all this information.

I think you are on the right path, but since Satoshi was the creator of bitcoin, and we all thank him for that so maybe we should try to not help in the discovery of his identity as a token of appreciation. If you don't let this one go, you will probably ruin bitcoin, Christmas and very important companies in our society. Some things are better left hidden.

I think Santa is safe for now. Just remember that Kris Kringle has used pseudo-names for decades and the elves at the bitcoin foundation will keep him safe.

Besides:

Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria applied for the trademark of Bitcoin Cash, and calls himself Satoshi Nakamoto

Wants to charge 2% royalties for transactions over $800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMahwybUUd4

http://satoshinakamoto.ws/

https://i.imgur.com/7kuvjvi.png

https://i.imgur.com/ZKqRGmH.png

https://i.imgur.com/i7upJG7.png




Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: nanasei on June 23, 2018, 01:38:33 AM
There is a conspiracy on bitcointalk that Satoshis nakamoto was a member of this forum and set it up while going out of the forum. But I don't believe it.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: CRYPTON0101 on June 23, 2018, 03:01:02 AM
More likely not a person due to the complexity of the code. AI makes sense complex computational power. Through deep learning AI controls financial resources feeds on broadness of blockchain to grow and expand.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 23, 2018, 03:39:17 AM
There is a conspiracy on bitcointalk that Satoshis nakamoto was a member of this forum and set it up while going out of the forum. But I don't believe it.

More than a conspiracy. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Blackshadow007 on June 23, 2018, 03:42:59 AM
I think its a name behind which involve many people possibly a team of genius people . Whatever Mr. Satoshi is a Ghost lol and should remain so .


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on June 23, 2018, 03:46:40 AM
More likely not a person due to the complexity of the code. AI makes sense complex computational power. Through deep learning AI controls financial resources feeds on broadness of blockchain to grow and expand.


I disagree. Everything is complex if you don't understand it.

People like Wei Dai, Adam Beck, Hal Finney, Gavin Andresen, Martti Malmi, and many others are all capable of understanding and developing the complexities of bitcoin.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Getcoinsite on June 23, 2018, 03:48:48 AM
What a detailed topic that complies about all the inquiries and question in every cryptonians specially those bitcoiners that looking for concrete answers.

Though its very related in every issues still no perfect answer to the question that Who's Satoshi Nakamoto but i resepct the mans Privacy and besides theres no enough words to thank him for bringing blockchain to us all


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: neliawesome on June 23, 2018, 03:59:35 AM
I am very curious of Satoshi Nakamoto because of his briiliant ideas of creating bitcoin but I dont know if he really does exist or not.I am amazed because through his great minds he contributed much to everyone.But due to unknown identity until now there are lots of people who claimed as him because they wanted to be famous or to scammed people.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 08, 2018, 06:38:12 AM
Just discovered an interesting Theymos thread about the removed Satoshi posts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898

I've also edited an earlier post in this thread and quoted Theymos.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Dmitry.Vastov on July 10, 2018, 07:34:49 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638)
SATOSHI NAKAMOTO the so called inventor and the owner of bitcoin , who so ever he is, first of all I like to thank him for his such a great invention because bitcoin in now a days is considered to be the boon for humanity and many has find Satoshi Nakamoto on many social networking sites like on Twitter or on Facebook where he use to interact with his users , though nobody has saw him yet but we all believe that he is there and once in my life I would like to meet him seriously.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 10, 2018, 10:47:07 AM
Nice thread!
Herewith, some proof of work timestamps, for reference;

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

...

some more proof of work ...

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38965734#msg38965734
Quote from: satoshi on July 14, 2010, 06:15:19 PM
Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 01:42:17 PM
Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 05:32:31 PM
Win32 CPU Cycles vs 'Live Protection' Engines ?
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35.0

Re: EARLY BITCOIN WALLET.DAT
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822045.msg18148803#msg18148803

 :-\


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 11, 2018, 10:13:12 PM
Nice thread!
Herewith, some proof of work timestamps, for reference;

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

...

some more proof of work ...

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38965734#msg38965734
Quote from: satoshi on July 14, 2010, 06:15:19 PM
Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 01:42:17 PM
Quote from: satoshi on July 15, 2010, 05:32:31 PM
Win32 CPU Cycles vs 'Live Protection' Engines ?
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35.0

Re: EARLY BITCOIN WALLET.DAT
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822045.msg18148803#msg18148803

 :-\

The reason I made this thread was to consolidate the great information on the forum. Not by replicating it but by linking to it.
Another reason I made it was to stimulate some intelligent conversation and hopefully draw out some of the legends on here that were part of that history in the making.

I feel I have succeeded with all those objectives.

When seeing this - that is impressive:
https://i.imgur.com/J4tToO2.png - in case image doesn't load.
https://i.imgur.com/J4tToO2.png


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 12, 2018, 10:37:15 AM
Regards,

I've always thought the following is interesting in regards to Craig Wright and Dave Kleiman;
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright

32. Wright, Craig; Kleiman, Dave; Sundhar R.S., Shayaam (2008). "Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy". In Sekar, R. Information Systems Security: 4th International Conference, ICISS 2008, Hyderabad, India, December 16–20, 2008, Proceedings. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 243.

Note that that paper is online at multiple sources along with the other guys c.v. / linkedin (which is continually beyond impressive; if you want a gov / big data / conspiracy / connection).  :D

and

33. Smith, Paul (27 February 2008). "Biometrics attracts few takers". CIO Magazine.   :P

...

Stop talking, stop thinking, and there is nothing you will not understand.
Return to the root and you will find the meaning;
Pursue the light, and you will lose its source ...
There is no need to seek truth:
only stop having views.

- Seng-ts'an/Sosan (d.600)

Do not seek to follow in the
footsteps of the masters;
seek what they sought.

- Zen saying

 ?  ;D

Additional: If anyone thinks that the creation of digital gold would unlikely attract the attention of (state?) actors and/or other different nefarious types; then just familiarize yourself with the history of it;
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_gold_currency


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies.
Post by: piterpie on July 12, 2018, 10:44:05 AM
thank you for such a detail post summary about him. i still imagine that he's asian and middle age now but who knows.
I think Satoshi Nakamoto is a group living in Japan. Before, when I first invested in the cryptocurrency market, there were many people who told me they had met Satoshi in real life. But I guess Satoshi Nakamoto is just a myth


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 14, 2018, 08:42:33 PM
I, BitcoinFX hereby state that when I started mining bitcoin in early 2010 I used the following windows program (Prio)
- https://www.prnwatch.com/prio/ - to watch all incoming and outgoing TCP/IP connections to the Bitcoin network from my home PC, which was fully port forwarded on 8333.

I distinctly recall resolving the website of said Dave Kleiman, as to this effect, the domain name was also acting as a bitcoin P2P node.

Either ... www. DigitalComputerForensicExpert .com or www. DaveKleiman .com or www. ComputerForensicExaminer .com

The website had a distinct design that stuck in my memory coupled with the fact that, as an individual who had recently discovered Bitcoin, this reassured myself that other IT professionals were interested in the project (if only from a research / testing standpoint).

Kindest Regards,


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 14, 2018, 09:15:49 PM
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman

... "According to Craig Wright, Kleiman lost money due to US government seizing of Costa Rica-based Bitcoin exchange called Liberty Reserve leading to Kleiman's poverty. " ...
- Metro, Friday 6 Apr 2018 12:28 pm
- http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/06/alleged-bitcoin-creator-craig-satoshi-nakamoto-wright-reveals-secrets-rare-interview-7444418/

...

Here is a link to a thread regarding my old / original exchange service 'BitcoinFX' ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822045.msg18151407#msg18151407

Now. Does anyone find it just a little bit odd that my website does not feature anywhere in any of the Bitcoin history time lines? Despite references to my service being originally made via the bitcointalk.org forum.

Realize that I myself lost a lot of totally legally earned money (via retail forex trading and some advertising revenues) when LR was shut down and users funds were confiscated by the US government - personal / business account funds which I myself also intended to move back into BTC ...

Something really stinks here folks! Obviously!


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: butcher_spam on July 14, 2018, 09:23:58 PM
either way, we won't know the truth. at least for us it will remain a mystery, as it concerns the personal safety of Satoshi Nakomoto. Just imagine, if the world knew the identity of the founder, he would be put on international wanted list in many countries, all because our world is full of greedy and evil people.
but I still hold the view that our administrator theymos knows the identity of this person, and perhaps he is part of the Satoshi team. Despite this, I think that this person will be a long time to thank, as many users have already done. :)
Satoshi Nakamoto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 14, 2018, 09:33:53 PM
either way, we won't know the truth. at least for us it will remain a mystery, as it concerns the personal safety of Satoshi Nakomoto. Just imagine, if the world knew the identity of the founder, he would be put on international wanted list in many countries, all because our world is full of greedy and evil people.
but I still hold the view that our administrator theymos knows the identity of this person, and perhaps he is part of the Satoshi team. Despite this, I think that this person will be a long time to thank, as many users have already done. :)
Satoshi Nakamoto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)

This is completely irrelevant in this instance as;

Dave Kleiman is now deceased.

Craig Wright has already asserted himself to be Satoshi Nakamoto and is re-asserting BCH as the main BTC chain.

I, myself have nothing to lose in this regard, if I can help seek truth and justice then I will. TBH I would quite like to get some of my hard earned 'money' back myself! Grand larceny is a crime.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: mymenace on July 14, 2018, 09:42:03 PM
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman

... "According to Craig Wright, Kleiman lost money due to US government seizing of Costa Rica-based Bitcoin exchange called Liberty Reserve leading to Kleiman's poverty. " ...
- Metro, Friday 6 Apr 2018 12:28 pm
- http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/06/alleged-bitcoin-creator-craig-satoshi-nakamoto-wright-reveals-secrets-rare-interview-7444418/

...

Here is a link to a thread regarding my old / original exchange service 'BitcoinFX' ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822045.msg18151407#msg18151407

Now. Does anyone find it just a little bit odd that my website does not feature anywhere in any of the Bitcoin history time lines? Despite references to my service being originally made via the bitcointalk.org forum.

Realize that I myself lost a lot of totally legally earned money (via retail forex trading and some advertising revenues) when LR was shut down and users funds were confiscated by the US government - personal / business account funds which I myself also intended to move back into BTC ...

Something really stinks here folks! Obviously!



Really Stinks


...."Dr Craig S Wright
‏Verified account @ProfFaustus
Jul 10

The best way to destroy Bitcoin, add something like OP_EXEC.

Tech solutions to problems that do not exist.

People with ETH envy should just work on ETH. They might then finally understand why these asinine ideas are such shit.".....




They want the bitcoin blockchain gone because it holds the evidence of the liberty reserve scandal

Why they all looking at Bcashers as Satoshi (obvious these punks want bitcoin dead, not defeated, not replaced, GONE!!!)


It is and always has been since 2008 a Currency War


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Vart4varta on July 14, 2018, 09:54:36 PM
Whether he was created by the government or not, people loved bitcoin, and this is a bad sign for those who are engaged in money laundering and crime. All we can do is relax and enjoy the way the commission rates for transactions and payments are reduced.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: 4abrec on July 14, 2018, 10:32:43 PM
either way, we won't know the truth. at least for us it will remain a mystery, as it concerns the personal safety of Satoshi Nakomoto. Just imagine, if the world knew the identity of the founder, he would be put on international wanted list in many countries, all because our world is full of greedy and evil people.
but I still hold the view that our administrator theymos knows the identity of this person, and perhaps he is part of the Satoshi team. Despite this, I think that this person will be a long time to thank, as many users have already done. :)
Satoshi Nakamoto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)

This is completely irrelevant in this instance as;

Dave Kleiman is now deceased.

Craig Wright has already asserted himself to be Satoshi Nakamoto and is re-asserting BCH as the main BTC chain.

I, myself have nothing to lose in this regard, if I can help seek truth and justice then I will. TBH I would quite like to get some of my hard earned 'money' back myself! Grand larceny is a crime.
Most importantly, there are people like you who are willing to fight for justice and truth. After all, we all know that the power is in the truth. I'm certainly powerless to help you, but I would be very happy if you could get justice in this matter.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: 4abrec on July 14, 2018, 10:39:45 PM

Really Stinks


...."Dr Craig S Wright
‏Verified account @ProfFaustus
Jul 10

The best way to destroy Bitcoin, add something like OP_EXEC.

Tech solutions to problems that do not exist.

People with ETH envy should just work on ETH. They might then finally understand why these asinine ideas are such shit.".....




They want the bitcoin blockchain gone because it holds the evidence of the liberty reserve scandal

Why they all looking at Bcashers as Satoshi (obvious these punks want bitcoin dead, not defeated, not replaced, GONE!!!)


It is and always has been since 2008 a Currency War
Yes, I know that the war of currencies is a very long time, and many want the power in the crypto-currency market, but I sincerely believe that these people are wasting their labor and they should not succeed.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 14, 2018, 10:47:06 PM
either way, we won't know the truth. at least for us it will remain a mystery, as it concerns the personal safety of Satoshi Nakomoto. Just imagine, if the world knew the identity of the founder, he would be put on international wanted list in many countries, all because our world is full of greedy and evil people.
but I still hold the view that our administrator theymos knows the identity of this person, and perhaps he is part of the Satoshi team. Despite this, I think that this person will be a long time to thank, as many users have already done. :)
Satoshi Nakamoto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)

This is completely irrelevant in this instance as;

Dave Kleiman is now deceased.

Craig Wright has already asserted himself to be Satoshi Nakamoto and is re-asserting BCH as the main BTC chain.

I, myself have nothing to lose in this regard, if I can help seek truth and justice then I will. TBH I would quite like to get some of my hard earned 'money' back myself! Grand larceny is a crime.
Most importantly, there are people like you who are willing to fight for justice and truth. After all, we all know that the power is in the truth. I'm certainly powerless to help you, but I would be very happy if you could get justice in this matter.

Here, here! Thank you.

For the record, logs I have are stored in multiple locations and I have also made sure that people who I can assume to trust in the Bitcoin space know my identity.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Baimovic on July 14, 2018, 11:01:55 PM
this is very interesting, especially some names of companies that match with the name satoshi nakamoto, samsung, toshiba, nakamichi, motorola. is this just a coincidence?

or a name that is conceptualized and planned? if all those companies belong to satoshi, I think that's impossible.

all that companies have older age than bitcoin.

My assumption, that is speculation without foundation and accidental speculation.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: butcher_spam on July 14, 2018, 11:41:39 PM
this is very interesting, especially some names of companies that match with the name satoshi nakamoto, samsung, toshiba, nakamichi, motorola. is this just a coincidence?

or a name that is conceptualized and planned? if all those companies belong to satoshi, I think that's impossible.

all that companies have older age than bitcoin.

My assumption, that is speculation without foundation and accidental speculation.
Not a fact! Such coincidences even my child can lead a lot.
Everyone needs facts, not coincidences.
No facts yet. There are only persons who are still silent and I think that they will be silent for a very long time.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Nhor1011 on July 14, 2018, 11:53:40 PM
   Satoshi Nakamoto is still a living  legend that always keep a secrets and always wants privacy,respect and anonimity. So,i think it is enough that we know who is Sotoshi Nakamoto and just be thankful that through that person bitcoin was created and give hope,help and future for everyone. Let us continue support and patronize bitcoin as a symbol of a person with great mind a big heart for every one of us here in cryptocurrency.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 15, 2018, 12:22:33 AM
  Satoshi Nakamoto is still a living  legend that always keep a secrets and always wants privacy,respect and anonimity. So,i think it is enough that we know who is Sotoshi Nakamoto and just be thankful that through that person bitcoin was created and give hope,help and future for everyone. Let us continue support and patronize bitcoin as a symbol of a person with great mind a big heart for every one of us here in cryptocurrency.

I'm not seeking Satoshi.
I'm seeking who is not Satoshi.

:-X   8)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 16, 2018, 07:43:08 PM

I'm not seeking Satoshi.
I'm seeking who is not Satoshi.

:-X   8)

I agree. There will be many charlatans claiming to be Satoshi.

It is the only hindrance of not knowing his identity.

One big red flag is when someone utters "I am Satoshi" as I don't believe the real Satoshi would say that.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: September11 on July 16, 2018, 09:08:11 PM
Wow, this is one of the best posts I've ever seen on the theme of Satoshi's identity. I would merit it but I'm quite poor in zMerits.
Still, nobody has theorized that Satoshi Nakamoto could in fact be the name of the hamster of the real creator of Bitcoin. Or perhaps his snake instead :)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on July 16, 2018, 10:04:23 PM
Re: the recent: Paper: Duality: An excerpt - http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf

Back to the topic then ...

The paper contains a couple of references to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number))

" ... The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, the "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", calculated by an enormous supercomputer named Deep Thought over a period of 7.5 million years. Unfortunately, no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet was built from organic components and named "Earth". The Ultimate Question "What do you get when you multiply six by nine" was found by Arthur Dent and Ford Prefect in the second book of the series, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. ... "

and

" ... In Japanese culture, the number 42 is considered unlucky because the numerals when pronounced separately—shi ni (four two)—sound like the word "death". ...

oh, and not forgetting the most important bit ...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/Simple_Magic_Cube.svg/220px-Simple_Magic_Cube.svg.png

So, .... some facts and some fiction here perhaps?

Remember : The next time someone asks you to explain how Bitcoin works ... Tell them it works like a chain of 'solved' rubiks cubes (magic cubes), where all the contained transaction data must match up (like the faces of the cube), before any work on the next cube (block) can commence.

Magic Internet Money - Who knew ?  :)

- https://youtu.be/aboZctrHfK8

 8)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 16, 2018, 10:31:23 PM
Re: the recent: Paper: Duality: An excerpt - http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf

Back to the topic then ...

The paper contains a couple of references to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number))

" ... The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, the "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", calculated by an enormous supercomputer named Deep Thought over a period of 7.5 million years. Unfortunately, no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet was built from organic components and named "Earth". The Ultimate Question "What do you get when you multiply six by nine" was found by Arthur Dent and Ford Prefect in the second book of the series, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. ... "

and

" ... In Japanese culture, the number 42 is considered unlucky because the numerals when pronounced separately—shi ni (four two)—sound like the word "death". ...

oh, and not forgetting the most important bit ...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/Simple_Magic_Cube.svg/220px-Simple_Magic_Cube.svg.png

So, .... some facts and some fiction here perhaps?

Remember : The next time someone asks you to explain how Bitcoin works ... Tell them it works like a chain of 'solved' rubiks cubes (magic cubes), where all the contained transaction data must match up (like the faces of the cube), before any work on the next cube (block) can commence.

Magic Internet Money - Who knew ?  :)

- https://youtu.be/aboZctrHfK8

 8)

I demolished that paper as a hoax here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41493435#msg41493435

and here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924

The book might still be interesting fiction. ;D

I think I would rather read a non fiction book by someone like you bitcoinFX. That way I know the the story is real. There are so many people that are part of this whole story that I much rather hear it from. Whether it is Enzo Ferrari, one of his trusted engineers or one of the team drivers. The story will be great.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: mymenace on July 16, 2018, 10:33:43 PM

I'm not seeking Satoshi.
I'm seeking who is not Satoshi.

:-X   8)

I agree. There will be many charlatans claiming to be Satoshi.

It is the only hindrance of not knowing his identity.

One big red flag is when someone utters "I am Satoshi" as I don't believe the real Satoshi would say that.

We are satoshi?


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 16, 2018, 10:37:09 PM

I'm not seeking Satoshi.
I'm seeking who is not Satoshi.

:-X   8)

I agree. There will be many charlatans claiming to be Satoshi.

It is the only hindrance of not knowing his identity.

One big red flag is when someone utters "I am Satoshi" as I don't believe the real Satoshi would say that.

We are satoshi?
;D

We as in Me, Myself and I ?

I think everyone participates in Satoshis vision. Some positively and some not...

For the record, logs I have are stored in multiple locations and I have also made sure that people who I can assume to trust in the Bitcoin space know my identity.

I'm quite excited that someone like you, bitcoinFX (user number 30 !) is here on the forum able to relay some of his experiences. Without these very early adopters bitcoin would not be where it is now. There are contributors all along the way in different roles but it is something very unique if you can take part in something like this right at the start.

What would make an awesome book to read is if most of the people involved early on in bitcoin all wrote one page or one chapter each.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: andohyeb on July 16, 2018, 10:51:47 PM
Satoshi Nakamoto is still alive and I believe the conspiracy theory that he is still active on this bitcointalk forum and part of the administrator of the forum. But my problem is how will anyone with the skills to invent such a great technology will be hiding.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 17, 2018, 01:30:19 AM
Satoshi Nakamoto is still alive and I believe the conspiracy theory that he is still active on this bitcointalk forum and part of the administrator of the forum. But my problem is how will anyone with the skills to invent such a great technology will be hiding.

Whether alive or not. There are very good reasons to be hiding.

Some people do not seek fame, Government attention, Media attention or wealth. Some people do things because it is the right thing to do and prefer to hide from the limelight.

Privacy - a common saying is if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about.

Cool - I'm happy to take away your curtains and your toilet door ! Others will be happy to steal your identity and possessions.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: mymenace on July 17, 2018, 06:44:09 AM

I'm not seeking Satoshi.
I'm seeking who is not Satoshi.

:-X   8)

I agree. There will be many charlatans claiming to be Satoshi.

It is the only hindrance of not knowing his identity.

One big red flag is when someone utters "I am Satoshi" as I don't believe the real Satoshi would say that.

We are satoshi?
;D

We as in Me, Myself and I ?

I think everyone participates in Satoshis vision. Some positively and some not...

For the record, logs I have are stored in multiple locations and I have also made sure that people who I can assume to trust in the Bitcoin space know my identity.

I'm quite excited that someone like you, bitcoinFX (user number 30 !) is here on the forum able to relay some of his experiences. Without these very early adopters bitcoin would not be where it is now. There are contributors all along the way in different roles but it is something very unique if you can take part in something like this right at the start.

What would make an awesome book to read is if most of the people involved early on in bitcoin all wrote one page or one chapter each.

No as in Satoshi is a team of cypherpunks  ;D

Timelines of 2 prominent founders within this group coexist in a strange twist of political intrigue, intelligence agencies, disappearance and asylum

I like conspiracy theories, make it up as you go along so much easier



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: unusualfacts30 on July 17, 2018, 06:59:02 AM
Samsung, Toshiba, Nakamichi, Motorolla.

Has anyone tried contacting them to see if they know whereabouts of Satoshi Nakamoto? Perhaps he was one individual working with them or four individuals working as one. who knows.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 17, 2018, 09:11:57 AM

No as in Satoshi is a team of cypherpunks  ;D

Timelines of 2 prominent founders within this group coexist in a strange twist of political intrigue, intelligence agencies, disappearance and asylum

I like conspiracy theories, make it up as you go along so much easier



Make it up as you go.

That is what politicians, intelligence agencies and people stuck in asylums often do too.  ;D


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: mymenace on July 17, 2018, 10:15:56 AM

No as in Satoshi is a team of cypherpunks  ;D
Timelines of 2 prominent founders within this group coexist in a strange twist of political intrigue, intelligence agencies, disappearance and asylum
I like conspiracy theories, make it up as you go along so much easier

Make it up as you go.
That is what politicians, intelligence agencies and people stuck in asylums often do too.  ;D

No reason to reinvent the wheel, follow the crazies

So as the theory continues...
Disappearance and Asylum

6 months apart, founders, cypherpunk group - who and who (disappeared and requested to be crazy [asylum])?  ;D


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on July 17, 2018, 11:24:26 AM

No as in Satoshi is a team of cypherpunks  ;D
Timelines of 2 prominent founders within this group coexist in a strange twist of political intrigue, intelligence agencies, disappearance and asylum
I like conspiracy theories, make it up as you go along so much easier

Make it up as you go.
That is what politicians, intelligence agencies and people stuck in asylums often do too.  ;D

No reason to reinvent the wheel, follow the crazies

So as the theory continues...
Disappearance and Asylum

6 months apart, founders, cypherpunk group - who and who (disappeared and requested to be crazy [asylum])?  ;D

Can you elaborate ?


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: munareal on July 17, 2018, 11:57:18 AM
There are many reasons why Satoshi's identity is left hidden. We should respect his privacy and appreciate the work he had developed for the use of humanity which is really overwhelming.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Qeupe on July 17, 2018, 12:20:28 PM
Let it be a mystery, there must be a good weld why it is hidden. The most important thing now is the result of his work that has changed the world, its impact is greatly felt by the community. His dedication has helped many people in financial terms, thanks Satoshi


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Al the Alpaca on July 17, 2018, 12:28:57 PM
Let it be a mystery, there must be a good weld why it is hidden. The most important thing now is the result of his work that has changed the world, its impact is greatly felt by the community. His dedication has helped many people in financial terms, thanks Satoshi

well, we must not focus about the creator of bitcoin. we must focus on what is good about it. focus on your investments, earnings and many more. We believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is a great creator of Bitcoin, his/her dedication on pushing Bitcoin to be legalized in many countries is very good, I believe that Many investors are now thankful on Satoshi Nakamoto because of his legacy unto us.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Gotumoot on July 17, 2018, 01:00:50 PM
Let it be a mystery, there must be a good weld why it is hidden. The most important thing now is the result of his work that has changed the world, its impact is greatly felt by the community. His dedication has helped many people in financial terms, thanks Satoshi

well, we must not focus about the creator of bitcoin. we must focus on what is good about it. focus on your investments, earnings and many more. We believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is a great creator of Bitcoin, his/her dedication on pushing Bitcoin to be legalized in many countries is very good, I believe that Many investors are now thankful on Satoshi Nakamoto because of his legacy unto us.
Sometimes its ok to be curious on whats happening. For us humans, its normal that we seek for the truth and all the things about something. Satoshi nakamoto is a alias used by a person or group that created bitcoin. Its real identity is not known, but there people that claiming they're satoshi nakamoto but they dont have valid reason. I think the real satoshi just wanted to help the people but dont want to be known its real identity.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: atogsice on July 17, 2018, 01:03:01 PM
More than his coding skills, I like how he has kept his identity hidden. He though about long term.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitBite5 on July 17, 2018, 01:06:14 PM
People like misteries and conspiracy theories more than everything, they enjoy it so much. So the same it's with Satoshi too.
I believe that Satoshi whoever he/she/it is will not reveal the true identity, this will remain the secret. And besides to feed the curiosity there is no reason to know the actual identity.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: arabellascott21 on July 17, 2018, 02:02:39 PM
Nobody would really know for sure. Let's just respect his privacy and let him be. We will know eventually who he is if he do reveal himself.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: mymenace on July 17, 2018, 09:23:28 PM
A

State
Authority of
Totalitarian control by
Oligarchs using a
System of
Hierarchical
Institutions


You are

We are

Satoshi

You are already one Satoshi of many, use Bitcoin as your weapon and break free


Developers of bitcoin
Satoshi Nakamoto
Team
Satoshi Dead, Nakamoto Imprisoned


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: vlad230 on September 07, 2018, 08:00:59 PM
This was a very interesting read, OP. You have truly gone above and beyond to gather this list of findings, you might consider changing your career to be a detective  :P

He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
I think this was an important piece of the puzzle. Considering every human needs sleep, I would say this is his night time, thus putting him on a US timezone for sure.

Some people were saying he was UK based but I don't think that's accurate. So, we could exclude that.



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: lillyann on September 07, 2018, 08:33:00 PM
Samsung, Toshiba, Nakamichi, Motorolla.

Has anyone tried contacting them to see if they know whereabouts of Satoshi Nakamoto? Perhaps he was one individual working with them or four individuals working as one. who knows.
I think we will not find out the truth. Contact will not do anything. With kis to contact? these are huge companies. I can see that working people are not facts.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: salimRonn123 on September 22, 2018, 01:07:56 PM
Privacy - a common saying is that if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about. Others will be happy to steal your identity and property. The schedules of two prominent founders in this group coexist in a strange transformation of political conspiracy, intelligence, disappearance and refugees.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: ubiheal200 on October 04, 2018, 11:05:30 AM
Has anyone tried to contact them to see if they know where Satoshi Nakamoto is? There are many reasons why the identity of Satoshi is hidden. Let it be a mystery, there must be a good solder why it hidden. His dedication helped many people in financial terms, thanks, Satoshi


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: pumbum on October 05, 2018, 05:10:09 PM
I think that the faces will appear only when the cryptocurrency will be useless. or when the cryptocurrency will deanonymization thanks to the power of a computer at the end of the money in Fiat


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Dmitry.Vastov on October 07, 2018, 04:48:23 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)
Bitcoin was introduced in 2009 , a decade ago and now it has been considered as the finest invention to the mankind and SATOSHI NAKAMOTO, is the first who is considered behind the invention of bitcoin, though nobody has met him yet and his presence is even doubtful as nobody has seen him yet but there are gossip that he used to talk and interact with people on social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, though, I haven’t chat with him yet but once I got chance, I would like to meet him once in my life.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: abhi777 on October 07, 2018, 07:17:20 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)
Bitcoin was introduced in 2009 , a decade ago and now it has been considered as the finest invention to the mankind and SATOSHI NAKAMOTO, is the first who is considered behind the invention of bitcoin, though nobody has met him yet and his presence is even doubtful as nobody has seen him yet but there are gossip that he used to talk and interact with people on social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, though, I haven’t chat with him yet but once I got chance, I would like to meet him once in my life.
Satoshi Nakamoto is a term used by someone who is unknown and is a designer of bitcoin and the results of its original application refers to Bitcoin Core. Through its application in Bitcoin Core, the base of the blockchain database has also been planned with careful thought for the first time. In a series of actions taken, the problem of double-spending payments for digital currencies can be found by Satoshi Nakamoto for the first time. Satoshi Nakamoto is an active follower in relation to the development of bitcoin until 2010.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Dmitry.Vastov on October 08, 2018, 08:44:48 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)
Bitcoin has made its unique identification in the market of investment and it is its users that has made so successful and popular and the bitcoin is on the top of on ranking of crypto currencies and the credit for all goes to SATOSHI Nakamoto, the so called inventor of bitcoin, though nobody has seen him yet but he used to talk to his investors through social networking sites but when in my life I would like to meet him and want to thank him for his invention.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bessta on October 08, 2018, 09:07:35 AM
This is actually a good speculation on who is he. Because of his japanese name, the only thing I can think of is he maybe is a japanese guy. But your speculation actually is really good and you were able to make your speculation well.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: xtraelv on November 16, 2018, 10:49:31 AM
Update on the Craig Wright / Kleiman claims:

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

https://i.imgur.com/UP3hBFN.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9vi00u/craig_wright_plan_on_stealing_old_wallet_balances/

https://i.imgur.com/kmVv3z3.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_worthless/

https://i.imgur.com/Cl523c9.png


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Get_Boogie_2night on November 16, 2018, 12:35:43 PM
To this day the craziest theory I've heard is that it's Elon Musk
All in all, most probably it was a group of people, we might find out any day now *sarcasm*


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: hv_ on July 08, 2019, 10:58:33 AM
New aspects

https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/c7g2jh/satoshi_nakamoto_tulip_trust_i_and_ii_and_his/


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Nolimitz84 on July 08, 2019, 11:24:47 AM
Thank you for so much detailed and interesting analysis.A lot of different options and there is no one single and true.The text has the words Satoshi Nakamoto where he tells his colleague that ,,he will do other things,.I wonder what this man is doing now?Most likely developing a super powerful quantum computer. ;) 8)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: kr105 on July 08, 2019, 12:21:18 PM
Thank you for so much detailed and interesting analysis.A lot of different options and there is no one single and true.The text has the words Satoshi Nakamoto where he tells his colleague that ,,he will do other things,.I wonder what this man is doing now?Most likely developing a super powerful quantum computer. ;) 8)

I agree that OP created very good and detailed topic here. Structure and design makes you wanna read all of it. Everything written in very smooth way, i like reading this kind of things on Bitcointalk.
Many people wants to know who Satoshi really is. Almost all Bitcoin supporters wanna know every detail about his life. Honestly i think it’s just better not to know the real story behind Satoshi Nakamoto. Sometimes little secrets make everything better. On the other hand some people really believe that he is dead already..


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bitcoinqubit on July 08, 2019, 03:11:17 PM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)


o much bullshit in this post did you know that journlist that was get info from underground people which behind wiki leaks and others always receive the inforamtion under one weird name .


you so uneducated in simple things that done over the web and its shows on very low logic and the ability to trace on the web

do you think wiki leaks run by one person ?????

bitcoin operation its done by global team , if you uneducated its dosent change this facts....

after bitcoin explode suddnely from no where cicada 3301 pop up and search people in the same area and other with sharp skills

sad to see so much people like you with so much starts and dont know shit about the web and what goes underground really

heyyyyyyyyyyyyy

bitcoin was nothing but nothing without top marketers which make it viral with ze0 salary

shame on you simple things like this you didnt know...

even more few people hint that peer to peer file sharing will make finical freedom one of them edoward snowden which was leak huge info amount to wiki leaks website and journlist from around the w0rld.

you just uneducated and dont know how things operate underground very simple and the bullshit you say dosent change the facts...

in other words wiki leaks run by one person because the journalist that was receiving info was get it under one name yet wiki leaks is rung by gloabl team....

and wiki leaks operation much more big then bitcoin relative * the biggest leaks dont in the entire history

educate your self littel bit and you have 5 shitty stars , so sad to this bullshit spread.

Daphne Caruana Galizia was get info from group of people which was under one name and they part of big global team, she was killed in very short time because she exposed to much ...

edoward snowdan was escaped from usa to china under different name and there part of the team waited him to hide him

some of them behind bitcoin and some hint that peer to peer going to make finical freedom which i dont going put names here its hint some where on the web who know to trace will get to them the other in this also huge operation called bitcoin we will never will get to them.

last point top marketers from around the world was making bitcoin viral,,,,who know if they part of them or not....marketing this is the brains which without them nothing happen...

soory for my english but i dont give a damn shit :)



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bitcoinqubit on July 08, 2019, 03:12:12 PM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)


o much bullshit in this post did you know that journlist that was get info from underground people which behind wiki leaks and others always receive the inforamtion under one weird name .


you so uneducated in simple things that done over the web

do you think wiki leaks run by one person ?????

bitcoin operation its done by global team , if you uneducated its dosent change this facts....

after bitcoin explode suddnely from no where cicada 3301 pop up and search people in the same area and other with sharp skills

sad to see so much people like you with so much starts and dont know shit about the web and what goes underground really

heyyyyyyyyyyyyy

bitcoin was nothing but nothing without top marketers which make it viral with ze0 salary

shame on you simple things like this you didnt know...

even more few people hint that peer to peer file sharing will make finical freedom one of them edoward snowden which was leak huge info amount to wiki leaks website and journlist from around the w0rld.

you just uneducated and dont know how things operate underground very simple and the bullshit you say dosent change the facts...

in other words wiki leaks run by one person because the journalist that was receiving info was get it under one name yet wiki leaks is rung by gloabl team....

and wiki leaks operation much more big then bitcoin relative * the biggest leaks dont in the entire history

educate your self littel bit and you have 5 shitty stars , so sad to this bullshit spread.

Daphne Caruana Galizia was get info from group of people which was under one name and they part of big global team, she was killed in very short time because she exposed to much ...

edoward snowdan was escaped from usa to china under different name and there part of the team waited him to hide him

some of them behind bitcoin and some hint that peer to peer going to make finical freedom which i dont going put names here its hint some where on the web who know to trace will get to them the other in this also huge operation called bitcoin we will never will get to them.

last point top marketers from around the world was making bitcoin viral,,,,who know if they part of them or not....marketing this is the brains which without them nothing happen...

soory for my english but i dont give a damn shit :)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bitcoinqubit on July 08, 2019, 04:06:57 PM

Thank you for letting me know this interesting information, but now I no longer care about who Satoshi Nakamoto is, instead I care about the development of Bitcoin in the future.

in reality it interesting when you get it right.

who want go more deep the rabbit hole and all what said here was said by people like kevin mitnick the legend and others legends,

i will put links to videos if people here to much uneducated to trace this simple things...

deep the rabbit hole...

**


this kind of people dont have salaries like fucky agents which backed by army of people/country and shitty salaries, they know to do bunch of money and be free and in the same time to do operations on a global scale like bitcoin and wiki leaks, and other cool stuff which agents only will dream to do and be aprt of this kind of people which challenge them self to make the imposiible over and over again without salaries and nothing.

you know the operation like wiki leaks its never ever done in the entire history the same with bitcoin, cicada 3301 which was pop short after bitcoin explode and search people in the same field* and skills and people with huge sharp logic.

another point is that this kind of info need to be exposed by agents from all countries around the world because they are the LAST HOPE FOR US...

yet they are the same shit like governmnets and in the end who did it underground people without salaries and without any protection, like

edoward snowdan and kevin mitnick , Chelsea E. Manning,  and Daphne Caruana Galizia which was killed in very short time and great honest women for great kids...killed.

there are bunch others some expose them self and dont give a damn shit and some hide because they know to much and other reasons.

for agents that backed by army of people and shitty salaries , to bring down someone, which mean to kill its dosent show on any intelligence or smart people they are fucking army of people that backed by shitty salaries hhhhhhh and still cannot get to the info that wiki leaks leaked by this huge team.

compare to wiki leaks operation which show on high intelligence and done by people which dont have shitty salaries and know to do huge amount of money,
and expose info which top agents from any country cannot do its fact and kevin mitnik the legend also said this i can put video here hhhhh!

wiki leaks this operation is the biggest one that was in the entire history and this is why great honest people killed fast!

bitcoin come from the same international team or some of them, and also the biggest startup that was ever created because the last startup in this area was paper money, after this no body try to compete usd,euro,shekel, what ever shit out there...

in 11 years market which almost half trillion created any agents from any counrty in the world only will dream be part of this kind of teams,

edoward snowden after exposing very important info about fbi shit clowns and other agents around the world which was on wiki leaks escaped to china there people waited him to hide him,,,,he escaped under different name and there are bunch like of him that move from country to country under different names for meetings and other important stuff . far away from illusion you think wiki leaks can run without organazied people over the web which know to communicate in way which is impossible to crack because if not this type of communication that was traced fast as light its fucking FACT!

edoward snowdan and other few which i will not name them was said before bitcoin came even that peer to peer file sharing will do financial freedom!!

cicada 3301 which shortly after bitcoin explode pop from no where and start to search for people in the same area hhhhhh and people with huge sharp logic, and went viral forever* which mean the topest marketers in the world was behind this project , its the same people behind wiki leaks and bitcoin....

...

so inspiring to see that underground people do shit which agents from all countries will only dream to do and be part, time changes and internet interconnect the smartest people on the globe.

after all they dont depend on shitty salaries and backed by army of people like agents yet they can learn them how to make huge amount of money and do projects on a global scale and communicate in some sort of way which impossible to crack it, how know maybe few people in this forum communicte secretly with others and give the illusion that there are no sender and  receiver who knows and other places??

Daphne Caruana Galizia which was killed in very short time  fucking great honest women for great kids,
what do you think this team need all this money to buy cool cars and show everyone they are the richest hell NO , for sure they drive in cool cars and live good yet they need to protect them self.

which mean if something will happen to kevin mitnick or edoward snowdan or others they have the power and MONEY to solve it once for all.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: hv_ on July 09, 2019, 05:59:52 AM
I bet we'll never know for sure..

But u might ask a few P2P about

https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/1148268836782780418


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bitcoinqubit on July 09, 2019, 09:43:13 AM
Who is Satoshi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin  (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/) "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0) in October 2008
Developed the code (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp) for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address (https://www.gmx.com/mail/#.1559516-header-nav1-2) and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
 Stefan Thomas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0), a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427158.0)
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)

His writing is clean, with few typos.
He shows a high proficiency in English. Making very few mistakes. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924)
After his first post, in which he used American spelling, he switched to English spelling for all the rest.



Quote from: satoshi
From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 4:38 PM
To: "Wei Dai" <weidai@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@anonymousspeech.com>
Subject: Citation of your b-money page

I was very interested to read your b-money page.  I'm getting ready to
release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.
Adam Back (hashcash.org) noticed the similarities and pointed me to your
site.

I need to find out the year of publication of your b-money page for the
citation in my paper.  It'll look like:
[1] W. Dai, "b-money," http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, (2006?).

You can download a pre-release draft at
http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html  Feel free to forward it to
anyone else you think would be interested.

Title: Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party

Abstract: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the
burdens of going through a financial institution.  Digital signatures
offer part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted
party is still required to prevent double-spending.  We propose a solution
to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.  The network
timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work.  The longest chain not only serves as proof of
the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest
pool of CPU power.  As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on
the network, they can generate the longest chain and outpace any
attackers.  The network itself requires minimal structure.  Messages are
broadcasted on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the
network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of
what happened while they were gone.

Satoshi

Was Satoshi a good coder ?

It was pretty good: I'd give it a grade of B+. The worst problem was that there were only a few, huge files, but if you ignored that then it made a lot of sense. It was written in (then-)modern C++, clearly with a lot of care. It was clearly not written in a stream-of-consciousness manner. There were very few bugs that you could blame on lack of programming skill.

My personal suspicion in this area is that Satoshi was never (or not recently) a full-time programmer, but he was pretty familiar with computer science (maybe a student or academic?), and he'd read some comprehensive C++ book just before starting on Bitcoin, so he made full and correct usage of C++ features in a slightly messy way.


Someone hacked Satoshis email account to try and discover who he is:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2062951.0

There are websites dedicated to preserving the writings of Satoshi Nakamoto:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/
http://satoshinakamoto.me/
The Dai / Nakamoto Emails:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto translated (meaning) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@decentro/satoshi-nakamoto-a-comprehensive-translation-of-an-enigma

https://i.imgur.com/hE8CoGX.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399281.msg4336076#msg4336076

Lots of people have been suspected of being Satoshi:

People who corresponded with him have all been named as suspects:

‎Hal Finney, Martti Malmi,  Adam Back, Michael Marquardt, Gavin Andresen and Wei Dai.

But in doing so are we minimising those individuals own contribution to Bitcoin.
They may not be the founder but they are the apostles.

Bitcoin is a collaboration of efforts based on a combination of ideas all consolidated in this whitepaper (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/)
It was then executed by a group of individuals, both identified and anonymous.


Many threads with some compelling arguments have been made about it.

I'm not going to duplicate the theories but have instead provided the links to various theories on here:

People or organisations that have been suspected of being Satoshi:

Charles Bry, David Chaum, Neal J. King, Shinichi Mochizuki, John Nash, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman, Gavin Andresen, Andreas Antonopoulos, Peter Bachman, John Perry Barlow, Doug Barnes, Michel Bauwens, BCNext, Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Bell, Kay Bell, Tamas Blummer, Nicholas Bohm, S. Boxx, Stefan Brands, Eli Brandt, Greg Broiles, Patrick Byrne, Jan Camenisch, Arthur Chandler, Jim Choate, Igor Chudov, Bram Cohen, Nick Collision, Matt Corallo, Geoff Dale, Luke Dashjr, L.Detweiler, Whitfield Diffie, Ray Dillinger, Jamie Dinkelacker, James A. Donald, Dooglus, Barry Downey, Evan Duffield, Vincent Durham, Tony Eng, Dan Fabulich, Niels Ferguson, Paul Ferguson, Amos Fiat, Art Forz, Matthew Franklin, Patri Friedman, Curtis D. Frye, Tony Gallippi, Jeff Garzik, Matthew Gaylor, John Gilmore, David Gordon, James Orlin Grabbe, Ron Gross, Ashish Gulhati, Laszlo Hanyecz, Martin Hellman, Michael Hendrix, Eyal Hertzog, Robert A. Hettinga, Eric Hughes, Mike Ingle, David Irvine, Douglas Jackson, Victor K., Jeff Kane, Mark Karpeles, Sunny King, Steve Klingsporn, Con Kolivas,  Dave Krieger, Nick Lambert, Matthew B. Landry, Laurie Law, Charles/Charlie Lee, Vili Lehdonvirta, Hendrik Lenstra, Romana Machado, Michael Marquardt, Yossi Matias, Gregory/Greg Maxwell, Timothy C. May, Jed McCaleb, Stanton McCandlish, James McCarthy, Jim McCoy, Alfred J. Menezes, Perry E. Metzger, Jude Milhon, Max More, David Naccache, Daniel A. Nagy, Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, Moni Naor, Satoshi Obana, Kazuo Ohta, Donald O'Mahony, Jackson Palmer, Torben Pedersen, Michael Peirce, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Naval Ravikant, Ben Reeves, Ron Rivest, Meni Rosenfeld, Nikolay Rozhok, Gary Rowe, Susan Sabett, Mayank Sahu, Steve Schear, Andreas Schildbach, Nils Schneider, Berry Schoenmakers, Adi Shamir, Carol Shaw, Charlie Shrem, Barry Silbert, Jerry Solinas, Markus Stadler, Bill Stewart, Patrick Strateman, Aaron Swartz, Amir Taaki, Yael Tauman, Hitesh Tewari, Will Thomas, Peter Todd, Zhou Tong, Dustin D. Trammell, Patrick P. Tsang,  Wladimir J. van der Laan, Thomas Vartanian, Roger Ver, Paul Vernon, Sebastiaan von Solms, Erik Voorhees, Michael Weber, Russell E. Whitaker, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, Peter Wuille, Moti Yung, Phil Zimmerman, Haibin Zhang, Theymos,  Marti Malmi  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=144445.0), Hal Finney #1  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2680645.0), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349725.0)' Nick Szabo #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071314.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361613.0), #3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322765.0),Mike Hearn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2146520.0),Michael Clear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49671.0),Dave Kleiman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.0),Not Wright or Kleiman (good post) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032215.msg31194506#msg31194506), Craig Steven Wright #1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1765953.0), #2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410287.0),Ross Ulbricht (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198085.0), Julian Assange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4271.0),Wei Dai, Ben Laurie, Nick Szabo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=689736.msg%msg_id%), Adam Back (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1345468.msg13718422#msg13718422), Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki,#1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209590.0;all), #2  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240301.0)


Craig Steven Wright lawsuit by Dave Kleiman Estate
https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit (external link)

Private key for the GENESIS block hidden in these equations? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462802.0)



IBM, DARPA, Google

FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, FSB, Mossad

YOU ?

Articles involving writing analysis:
Bootstrapped Gavin: Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity revealed! (https://zycrypto.com/bootstrapped-gavin-satoshi-nakamotos-identity-revealed/)
Research on Satoshi Nakamoto identity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.0)

Forbes journalist, Andy Greenberg discovered that a man by the name of Dorian Nakamoto, (born Satoshi) was living only a few blocks from Hal Finney. (The man who received the first bitcoin transaction)

https://i.imgur.com/9h2Jmx4.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769004.0 Dorian Nakamoto and Hal Finney

https://i.imgur.com/JbLIZGW.png

The impact was so adverse on Dorian Nakamoto that Andreas Antonopoulos ran a fundraiser for him. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505581.0)
Check fundraising address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX  (Given to him in March 2014)

  Most comprehensive list of suspects. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0)

Conspiracies:

Conspiracy theories (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87617#msg87617)
 Gavin Andreson and the CIA killed Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1458817.0)
 Satoshi is an AI robot (https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/907478/bitcoin-created-by-ai-robots-btc-cryptocurrency-artificial-intelligence)

Frauds:

 a fake Satoshi replied (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506692.0)
another fake Satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg87740#msg87740)
 "Satoshis spokesperson" -Miss Roselyn Hamilton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.msg12076159#msg12076159)
 Craig Wright “Mr Fake” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2422914.0)
Convicted fraudster Ronald Keala Kua Maria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg40699355#msg40699355)
 Satoshi is writing a book (https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/satoshi-nakamoto-family-foundation-is-purportedly-writing-a-bitcoin-beginnings-book/)
Paper: Duality: An excerpt (http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf)

There is a theory that the name is made up of common industrial companies.

https://i.imgur.com/wqlMYRN.jpg

SA            TOSHi  NAKA        MOTO
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola

If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to be known by another identity it is up to him or her to make that move. It is clear from the writing that they were deeply concerned about privacy.

Here are the writings of the real Satoshi (https://nakamotoinstitute.org/)


https://i.imgur.com/CU4VWz5.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/)

https://i.imgur.com/QwtFYKa.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

The current most popular theory:

Satoshi Nakamotos' current github is showing a photo of Dave Kleiman
https://github.com/satoshinnakamoto
https://i.imgur.com/8h4srqu.png

https://i.imgur.com/OFRH7IR.png

Quote
Mr Wright has also demonstrated this verification in person to The Economist—and not just for block 9, but block 1. Such demonstrations can be stage-managed; and information that allows us to go through the verification process independently was provided too late for us to do so fully. Still, as far as we can tell he indeed seems to be in possession of the keys, at least for block 9. This assessment is shared by two bitcoin insiders who have sat through the same demonstration: Jon Matonis, a bitcoin consultant and former director of the Bitcoin Foundation, and Gavin Andresen
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/05/02/2160632/oh-my-craig-wrights-keys-of-revelation/

This in combination to the claims made in the Dave Kleiman Estate  lawsuit  (https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit) against Craig Wright makes Dave Kleiman the current most plausible suspect.

Craig Wright filed a motion to dismiss (https://www.scribd.com/document/376723062/Motion#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X1678bab45d2ee3d0aeddda2a82e0b14b&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate)

But I'm still skeptical of the claim because it is reliant on Craig Wrights testimony. In my opinion he has a $54 million reason to lie.

Adresses debunked: https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

Has Craig Wright Committed Perjury? https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

Wright claimed AU$54 million in tax rebates for R&D in 2014/15. That is a lot of motive for a hoax. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-australian-who-may-have-invented-bitcoin-claimed-to-have-landed-54m-in-taxpayer-funded-rebates-2015-12

Wrights own mother claims he has a habit of lying: http://archive.is/kjuLi#selection-1655.0-1655.94

Craig Wrights MtGox account also is not that of a "whale" https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hx3q9/according_to_the_mtgox_leaks_from_early_2014_our/

Wright also claimed to have a  PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But the university denied ever handing him a Phd.

Cybersecurity firm Wizsec dismisses the Wright claims on which the Kleiman lawsuit is based as "fantasy" https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

My conclusion:

I rather not know. I think the mystery makes it more intriguing. Some legends are better as legends. Like Merlin and Robin Hood.

Further reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency

Re: Satoshi is Back, suggests Fortune
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg41411073#msg41411073

Satoshis missing posts  -Theymos (also quoted below)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56272.msg669898#msg669898


https://i.imgur.com/ocYZg3r.jpg

This is a work in progress, corrections and additions are welcome.  
Sources: UsernameBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=912930.0), AGD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg38967638#msg38967638),  BitcoinFX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg41895691#msg41895691)

There are so dump people out there there is no words to explain there dumbness , like saying the founder of Bitcoin sv is Satoshi when ironaclly he clam that Bitcoin is not real crypto and in the same type say he the founder hhhhhhh , and there are more dumber people then this which think Satoshi is one person ,

Did you know that wiki leaks operation million times bigger then Bitcoin operation , do you know how much people all around the globe try to trace the oragnized group of people behind wiki leaks, hell it's facts not the dumb posts which overload this fourm,

All this hint from where Bitcoin come and by which people on the web,

So simple...
And when journalist receive information from this team they receive always under one name..

So heck and simple to know this and it's all facts not stupid concpiricy theories which come from super dumb people


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Bitcoinqubit on July 09, 2019, 04:28:32 PM
Stop looking for Satoshi. Don't waste your time.

almost everything can be traced ... you wrong and yes some people from bitcoin operation we will never get to them this is true.



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: TimeBits on July 09, 2019, 05:29:30 PM
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola and Santa?
How high do you have to be?

Now for the real conspiracy

Satoshi showed up once again on April 23, 2011, when he emailed a software developer, Mike Hearn, with “I’ve moved on to other things. It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone.” From then no one knows what Satoshi is up to.

Gavin self admits to being a CIA INFORMANT
https://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=335

Bitcoin in the hands of the CIA, Created by the IMF and FED? probably I would say 90% chance bitcoin was created by people thinking about money and who was thinking about money other than the banks that were starting to get exposed around 2000-today on the internet?  and that entire genesis block pointing out the banker bailouts is all reverse social engineering to dupe you to think it is anti banker. It is their Trojan horse out of the fiat system as they know the collapse is inevitable as there is no way to pay back the debts.  

Both the first two ip`s came from the same area code that Hal Finney lived in. Could Hal just been remote viewing a office computer? Could Hal of been Satoshi playing around on two accounts like most people on this forum do? Could it explain why none of the coins have moved?

Anyways, serious talk, I am pretty sure they killed Satoshi and if you read the first sentence of the whitepaper you will understand bitcoin was not suppose to be a stock or investment. It was meant to be a non shit money supply and you fucks piss all over Satoshi`s grave every time you use fiat or sell bitcoin for fiat. Just use the fucking currency as a currency. I earned 4 bitcoins and spent 0 fiat, I got a computer, laptop, chair, clothes and meds and used no fiat. For real read the first sentence of the whitepaper, U$D is a financial institution you dumb fucks.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: hv_ on July 23, 2019, 11:24:59 AM

This first naming

Quote

http://www.upload.ae/file/6157/ecash-pdf.html


clearly hints for it's legit purpose.  Not just a store of value - with high fees...

And sure Satoshi was the creator of a new eCash - so he knew that he might Need highest privacy - and still ppl do not reall know who he is. - So he was good to manage that bit.

Bitcoin protocol is NOT that private - at will, for a purpose.  It lacks a lot of 'anonymity features' - thogh for a purpose - it's was designed that way.

> To get accepted by the globe (incl financial institutes, gov, mearchants, ...) for honest business.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: CBANX Ltd. on July 23, 2019, 11:58:59 AM
Satoshi Nakamoto is a fictional character to whom we can't suspect as one because he is not only an inventor of Bitcoin but also a father/mother of an astonishing technology i.e. Blockchain which makes him a never-dying fictional character.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: leech. on July 23, 2019, 11:59:23 AM
What if Satosi Nakamoto is just a fictional character behind whom there is a whole group of developers. I think that Bitcoin created a government of one of the countries (USA, China) to use this new industry further in its favor  :-\ :-\


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: songsunling on November 14, 2019, 07:29:59 AM
Satoshi Nakamoto is a team.  Hal Finney, Dave Kleiman, Craig Steven Wright should be the members.

https://github.com/Time02/SatoshiTimeLine


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BonfireBob on November 14, 2019, 07:56:43 AM
This is a great post. It is fun to follow the updates on who's Satoshi, it has became like Area 51 everyone want to know what is happening inside :D 


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 14, 2019, 01:02:04 PM
Samsung Toshiba Nakamichi Motorola and Santa?
How high do you have to be?

Now for the real conspiracy

Satoshi showed up once again on April 23, 2011, when he emailed a software developer, Mike Hearn, with “I’ve moved on to other things. It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone.” From then no one knows what Satoshi is up to.

Gavin self admits to being a CIA INFORMANT
https://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=335

Bitcoin in the hands of the CIA, Created by the IMF and FED? probably I would say 90% chance bitcoin was created by people thinking about money and who was thinking about money other than the banks that were starting to get exposed around 2000-today on the internet?  and that entire genesis block pointing out the banker bailouts is all reverse social engineering to dupe you to think it is anti banker. It is their Trojan horse out of the fiat system as they know the collapse is inevitable as there is no way to pay back the debts.  

Both the first two ip`s came from the same area code that Hal Finney lived in. Could Hal just been remote viewing a office computer? Could Hal of been Satoshi playing around on two accounts like most people on this forum do? Could it explain why none of the coins have moved?

Anyways, serious talk, I am pretty sure they killed Satoshi and if you read the first sentence of the whitepaper you will understand bitcoin was not suppose to be a stock or investment. It was meant to be a non shit money supply and you fucks piss all over Satoshi`s grave every time you use fiat or sell bitcoin for fiat. Just use the fucking currency as a currency. I earned 4 bitcoins and spent 0 fiat, I got a computer, laptop, chair, clothes and meds and used no fiat. For real read the first sentence of the whitepaper, U$D is a financial institution you dumb fucks.

Satoshi is not dead and I'm back they tried to let me forget about everything I did and they deleted my post here on bitcoin talk today and yesterday..
Governement is here and watching.
We need protect bitcoin network and explain what other government project are doing like XRP RSR AND DAPS , they are hiding they are working with governement.. and trying to do what they did already for years inside blockchain


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: crisanto01 on November 14, 2019, 01:39:04 PM
What if Satosi Nakamoto is just a fictional character behind whom there is a whole group of developers. I think that Bitcoin created a government of one of the countries (USA, China) to use this new industry further in its favor  :-\ :-\

That's what I thought too, that they are group of people but they are hiding their identity, what's the scariest thing that will happen is that if they are group of people and that is why they are hiding their selves identity is that the are planning something bigger that will shock the whole world and that is when the price of Bitcoin became $50k or more that they will sell it.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 14, 2019, 07:54:25 PM

satoshi is not dead


satoshi is obviously not dead he is a life form that has feelings but he is not one of you meaning you can't find him from a search warrant.

Hello you are back ?

Welcome back, nice try.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: drumamat on November 14, 2019, 08:23:45 PM
What if Satosi Nakamoto is just a fictional character behind whom there is a whole group of developers. I think that Bitcoin created a government of one of the countries (USA, China) to use this new industry further in its favor  :-\ :-\

That's what I thought too, that they are group of people but they are hiding their identity, what's the scariest thing that will happen is that if they are group of people and that is why they are hiding their selves identity is that the are planning something bigger that will shock the whole world and that is when the price of Bitcoin became $50k or more that they will sell it.
And in General, if in fact there is a group of people behind bitcoin, it is not clear what the purpose of their invention is?If the goals are clear-why then hide?It's a dilemma that makes me worry.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 02:56:25 PM

satoshi is not dead


satoshi is obviously not dead he is a life form that has feelings but he is not one of you meaning you can't find him from a search warrant.

Hello you are back ?

Welcome back, nice try.

some basic hodge podge of an idea I came up with in minutes for wif to private key, lemme no if you understand it

WIF_to_Privkey

BOOL checkuncompressed

Input WIF;

If firstcharacter == 5
     base58decode
     set bool variable to true;
Else base58decode
      set bool var to false;

drop last 8 characters

drop first two characters

if bool false drop last 2 characters

? privkey

also you can do a wif checksum

you need to explain me in wich software and for what to begin if you realy want to help me i'm late for 10 years man.

Thank you for your understanding.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: tsaroz on November 15, 2019, 03:02:33 PM
Satoshi was highly dedicated to keep his identity anonymous. He planned the exit from bitcoin even before he started working on it. He maintained anonymity with (almost) everyone he interacted to. He has a flawless American English and (intentionally) uses British spellings and phrases occasionally. This makes the theory of Satoshi being a famous person or a famous organization more valid than any other.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 03:04:24 PM
Satoshi was highly dedicated to keep his identity anonymous. He planned the exit from bitcoin even before he started working on it. He maintained anonymity with (almost) everyone he interacted to. He has a flawless American English and (intentionally) uses British spellings and phrases occasionally. This makes the theory of Satoshi being a famous person or a famous organization more valid than any other.

Yes a real Genius  ;)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 06:09:08 PM

Can we talk about the code you give me ?


Actually it is not code, but some coding logic.

For the base 58 decode, you may need big number, open ssl has that, for example.
You also need to solve leading zeroes and possibly trailing zero(es).
I don't think I will show you that code idea, plus it would not be how satoshi did it, nor for the project, but a standalone program anyway.

I understand you dsnt want to help me anymore to get back my bitcoin


The only bitcoin you have, you incompetent fool, is that that you stole to fund you mining alt coins

You are losing control and are realy non-professional guy, i stole nothing you probably need a break in what you are doing.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 06:52:05 PM

 i stole nothing you probably need a break in what you are doing.


for your total lack of progress the last 16 years, even going backwards, you should have retired at your twenty, bozo.

"you should be dead at your twenty" you mean.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 08:45:41 PM

 i stole nothing you probably need a break in what you are doing.


for your total lack of progress the last 16 years, even going backwards, you should have retired at your twenty, bozo.

"you should be dead at your twenty" you mean.


no, I type what I type not you. I meant what I said, you should have retired from being the federal agent at the mandatory twenty year retirement instead of someone higher up extending you. Stop making up ridiculous and ludicrous nonsense from your flimsy imagination, dolt.

In your dream maybe its happening like this.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 15, 2019, 09:19:31 PM

 i stole nothing you probably need a break in what you are doing.


for your total lack of progress the last 16 years, even going backwards, you should have retired at your twenty, bozo.

"you should be dead at your twenty" you mean.


no, I type what I type not you. I meant what I said, you should have retired from being the federal agent at the mandatory twenty year retirement instead of someone higher up extending you. Stop making up ridiculous and ludicrous nonsense from your flimsy imagination, dolt.

In your dream


nothing you have ever said, thought, or did has ever been accurate

I can understand your frustration.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: somsomnaja on November 20, 2019, 08:09:57 AM
thank you

slot (http://slot-888.co/)

สล็อตออนไลน์ (http://slot-888.co/)

สล็อตบนมือถือ (http://slot-888.co/)

เกมส์สล็อต (http://slot-888.co/)



Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: IwantMoonBefore2020 on November 20, 2019, 10:35:21 AM
You are welcome.
I love humanity and believe we are going to be better and more stronger togethers, help everyone you can you have the power to do it and you need to believe in yourself.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: fullhdpixel on November 21, 2019, 04:20:15 PM
Wow, this is a really interesting story. It's been long I took a long time in reading a story or post in this forum. I would usually just skim through them, but this one, lol, I got my eyes fixed on the screen scrolling slowly down and read everything. This is really interesting and you should keep it up, if there's still more you can be updating it here in case.

I would really love to know who is this Satoshi Nakamoto and why he has decided to stay in hiding. Such a person really deserves a prize, this is a really big work he did here and I'm surprised you said he's not really a programmer, but likely someone that recently learnt programming at the time he developed Bitcoin. Damn!. How has he been able to keep his identity secret to this day? I guess this wasn't planned in a day.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on May 27, 2020, 10:19:11 PM
 
Hey "Satoshi" ... I think I found you ...
 
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/373/839/b27.png
 
Am I right ?

 8)
 
N.B. I'm actually being serious here!

The individual in question is not in the OP.   ;D


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: wojak on May 28, 2020, 05:58:44 PM
So my hints:
Dan Fabulich - specialized in biomedical engineering and philosophy, Satoshi Nakamoto is japan scientist in biology, Nakamoto is also a japan philosopher. Additionally there is a lot of papers about cryptography and similar where papers of David Chaum are nearby papers of S.N. also Satoshi is popular word and I've found few times that such articles like "Impact of Artificial "Gummy" Fingers on Fingerprint Systems" are next to cryptocurrency and decentralized economy papers. Also there are multiple references to "she" - IMO: Sarah Flannery.

So in my opinion, people related at least in philosophy to David Chaum created this person in some very private mailing list, took almost random name, like Satoshi Nakamoto cause someone had his paper opened to read (in addition Tominaga Nakamoto philosophy is related to BTC).
It is especially interesting that David Chaum didn't liked the idea that one person - initiator - can become rich, like become lord of the world with unlimited resources.
In the end all of them decided that they will never use first bitcoins.

https://46.media.tumblr.com/499d07db1ca4fb6b29939ec03699e6b6/tumblr_p0de19fN3a1wrraimo1_400.gif

:P

pro hint: if you are searching mailing list archives for such things like interpunction, double spaces etc, dont check emails - most are altered, check those emails how they looks like in replies quotations.


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on June 07, 2020, 09:26:31 AM

The Escobars Believe They’ve Found the Real Satoshi ...
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/the-escobars-believe-theyve-found-the-real-satoshi

"... In a recent phone call with Cointelegraph, Gustaffson — right-hand man to Pablo’s brother Robert — relayed this fantastical version of events in an effort, he says, to silence some of the furor created by self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig S. Wright. ..."

...

Whilst not being the same candidate I've found in my own research ...

I guess when even Escobar Inc. is asserting that Craig S. Wright is NOT satoshi, one kind of has to agree!


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: Mbitr on June 07, 2020, 10:00:14 AM

The Escobars Believe They’ve Found the Real Satoshi ...
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/the-escobars-believe-theyve-found-the-real-satoshi

"... In a recent phone call with Cointelegraph, Gustaffson — right-hand man to Pablo’s brother Robert — relayed this fantastical version of events in an effort, he says, to silence some of the furor created by self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig S. Wright. ..."

...

Whilst not being the same candidate I've found in my own research ...

I guess when even Escobar Inc. is asserting that Craig S. Wright is NOT satoshi, one kind of has to agree!

I read this earlier and I think the crucial word is Fantastical ! But as you also said they are also discrediting CSW - so not all nonsense  :)


Title: Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
Post by: BitcoinFX on November 16, 2020, 11:55:01 AM
Research papers likely written by the real Satoshi Nakamoto ...

######### ######### ######## ###### ### ###############

## ####### #### ######## ###### ### ##############

### ######### ## #### ###### ########

############# ######## ### ######

;D