Bitcoin Forum

When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?

Yes off course mate signatures are the premium stuff around here. When you are publishing on the social media then it may not become the targeted type of advertisement as we don’t know whose really following us and what is their interest is really.

In case of signature as it is published over the forum which itself is crypto related with all the crypto lovers around here then it becomes the prime spot for everything. May that’s the reason they get heavy rewards.

Because it's "limited". Anyone can have a twitter or facebook account, but a bitcointalk with a high rank and good quality post? It requires time and dedication. And you are basically advertising in a website that talks all the time about the niche of your product (icos, blockchains, etc).

This is an already targeted audience. Anyone here is crypto aware. Making blog post   twiiter Facebook gives a lesser chance to reach targeted audience. Yes btt signature should receive more.

Exactly as you said, it is the best form for advertising their ICO. People on social media are almost 100% other bounty hunters, but here on forum, there are some people who have been in the whole crypto scene from the very beggining some years ago. Still I would love to see more of the rewards for socials.

I think you complain because you have a small rank. If you were at least full member then complaints about the fact that subscription companies eat ~ 40% of the pool of the pool would have disappeared by themselves)))

Because it is kind of targeted advertisement  ;)
There are a lot of potentional investors.
Also Twitter, Facebook banned crypto ads, that´s why these 2 will be soon delefted from bounty campaigns.

I think bounty campigns get the highest allocation because they provide highly targetted exposure, relevant advertising and in spot marketing to the crypto community, as bitcointalk forum represents the largest crypto community online to date, so i think signature campaign is the most important one so is the allocation.

I agree with you that members who are able to participate in signing are the most loyal followers of the encryption community, and perhaps the way social media can spread the project quickly, but the spread is inaccurate, and it may have a negative impact.

Yes, it takes time and energy to complete a signature campaign so payment should be commensurate with the efforts. I totally agree with you that signature campaign  ensures real value for money. Thanks

I think majority of the investors are aware and regularly checking bitcointalk.org forum. This means that the target market is on this website and it makes sense to allocate majority of the bounty pool to signature campaign. I was also checking the signature of upcoming ICO's and its a very effective way of knowing what the ICO has to offer. Other sites are confusing for investors while bitcointalk.org signatures makes their ICO research easier.

Yes off course mate signatures are the premium stuff around here. When you are publishing on the social media then it may not become the targeted type of advertisement as we don’t know whose really following us and what is their interest is really.

In case of signature as it is published over the forum which itself is crypto related with all the crypto lovers around here then it becomes the prime spot for everything. May that’s the reason they get heavy rewards.

Seems fair to me as majority of people looking to invest funds come to this forum, also as you alluded some bounty hunters like the projects they are promoting and get involved as a result.

because I think we can only choose one signature so that the signature is given a bigger allocation compared to other campaigns, because other campaign we can participate more than one.

It also took me some time to understand that it doesn't matter here how hard you work, you can earn much more just wearing a signature of a project, than making somewhat quality content about it. However, in the first case you may be not caring about the project at all, though in the second one you have to study it in details to be able to tell your audience about it. But personally my earning from signature campaigns have always been higher then from Youtube campaigns.

I agree with this reason, the signature campaign is very appropriate to advertise a new ICO because in this forum all are related to cryptocurrency.
so a lot of bounty programs give a high rewards to signature campaign

This is something I truly wondered about.

Have this problem from their perspective: A company wishes to advertise their ICO the most efficient way possible, and probably they are going to incentivise the one being it. Seems like it might be the Signature.

Why?
Because this is the biggest forum associated with cryptocurrencies. And each participant can have only a single signature. think about what other bounties exist: social media campaign: never really understood them. Maybe because I don't use Twitter, and use Facebook for staying in touch with friends, not to make investment decisions. Seeing something advertised on Facebook is an instant red flag for me.
There are others, like translation campaigns, but if someone is interested in cryptocurrencies, it is highly likely that person knows english. But I think it is the most "earned" or "noble" way of getting income of a bounty, to make a high quality translation of the whitepaper/website. But it will be handy for just a few investors, and it does not pay well compared to the work put into it.
Other ones, like making video about the project is usually a sellout, those videos usually are not honest, and heavily biased.
So out of all, I think signature bounty truly makes it the best option for a company, in bounty terms. However I would loveto see some statistics how many investors invested because they saw the project in a signature, and had the desire to invest into it. Or you can just see it as a banner for anyone who posts.

The signature campaign receives the highest reward because it is a major campaign of the ICO, which is the best form of advertising for every ICO. It achieves all the goals set by the ICO.

This is because most bounty hunters are more familiar with crypto and might be an investors. And those who are looking for a good project they can rely in this forum. We're not sure of the social media followers except social media related cryptocurrency news. So maybe it's deserving that the signature campaign has the highest pool.

I think the high percentage that is allocated to a signature campaign is right. Not everyone can have a good account on the forum, and every person has an account on facebook and tweeter. So I think that's all right.

Most investors in crypto who will commit real money into a project is found on this platform, hence a need to create awareness with signature campaign.

because it has a destination directly to the ICO that investors are in this forum. the signature campaign gives the role of seeking investors that many of them crypto there is definitely the nature of this forum. for the other campaign in the same certainly also has a nice goal and certainly also aims to find investors. but from some of the projects I have also seen is not always a signature.

Because we are promoting it through this forum and it is known by everyone with us making good posts and its signature affixed in our account to finish the campaign they have set.

Because this is the most effective way for promoting projects, while other campaign are held in social media or by articles in blogs, which they has very broad audiences. Ehile on signature campaign, it promotes only to people who are interested and undestand well, about cryptocurrency.

Now, especially after the introduction of the Merit of each account with a high rank is worth its weight in gold. And this is really the best tool for advertising the project, as you have noticed, the forum gathers people who are interested in cryptocurrency and can potentially become investors. Newbie keep track of users with a high rank and often they serve as a guide for them when choosing new projects.

I agree, signatures should have the highest % from all the bounty options. First of all, you can do only 1 signature at a time, compared with other options like social media, so it's much more valuable. Also, like you said, everyone reading this forum is a potential investor, so signatures have a huge marketing effect.

Forum is the best place for bounty. Here people come because they are interested about cryptos. In other social media cyptos are not as vast as forum cause there are various types of people and their expectations from these social network is not alike.

What you say is true. The reason why signature campaigns almost in all bounty programs get higher allocations than other campaigns because forum members already know about crypto which is a potential marketing target for ico projects. In addition, most of the forum members are investors, whether on a small or large scale. Unlike the audience of social media campaigns, project information will be widely accepted by the audience, but the audience is not necessarily aware of the crypto world.

That's it. And I believe that if not for the narrow public of the crypto currency, many ICO did not even spend on advertising in other networks. But alas, the public should increase and develop people's interest in this technology.

I have also noticed this but I think it is because of the impact it do have on investors as many investors look for investment information from bitcointalk than any social media.  It is truth that twitter and facebook has a wide coverage but bitcointalk has specific target and that is cryptocurrencies investors!

The bounty company knows what to invest more money in. Although what is most interesting in recent years, more often there are projects where a larger percentage of pours in facebook companies. And this despite the fact that many social networks prohibit the mention of cryptocurrencies....

But signature bounty participants are really enjoying bounty stakes. But you get to only participate in 1 for 2 to 3 months even more.
But the pay is worth it.

I agree with you mate. All persons who visit the site for the signature campaigns are all crypto lovers. For sure in advertising of some ICO will be lot easier.

sometimes signature campaigns offer more rewards than facebook campaigns and twitter campaigns, but sometimes we can meet a facebook campaign or twitter campaign to give more gifts than signature campaigns, even ico that do not use signature campaigns, I think the campaign signatures are more supportive overall because everyone diforum can see the campaign through the signature campaign.

I agree, signatures should be have the highest % from all the bounty options.

Why? First of all, you can do only 1 signature at a time, by Social Media you can used more.

So it's much more valuable.

Everyone in this forum is a potential investor, so signatures have a huge marketing effect.

Facebook or twitter are social network. So by posting in these networks will not be that much fruitful. But in forum audience is not limited. Crypto investors, bounty players and crypto head people flock together in the forum. So signature bounty should be given the highest pool.

Because only here everyone who saw the advertising of the project will understand what is at stake and will be able to make a contribution, unlike advertising on other resources, where you will not understand what this information is here.

Many investors are in this forum and this is the best way, Allocation to singnature campaign has always been a favorite in every bounty.

To the point) The point is that advertising through the social network, it's like telling pigeons about quantum physics. Basically it will not be knowledgeable people who may not even understand the meaning. Advertising through the social network is like cufflinks on an expensive suit - uncomfortably meaningless but necessary because the etiquette)

The thing is, that they are a lot of users in this message board, who are in to cryptocurrencies since beginning. They also buyed bitcoin or other currencies like ethereum for less then one dollar. They have so many cryptocurrencies, which they cant pay out because nobody would give them so many millions of dollars. And these people are still active here. So with signature campaigns you can reach all those people. These are the best investors!

I believe every project has its target market. The target market for ICOs is crypto community and the best place to find them is the crypto forums. It is more economical to reach out to 5k members on the forum that reaching out to 20k people on facebook. So i think they deserve it.

In my opinion signature is biggest pool in bounty baecause signature campaign gives big contribution to promote ico project. And especially I am sure many developers is in this forum.

Yes. I think you also have a point here. You can use your account to participate in only one campaign at a time but your social media accounts can be used for so many other bounties. It becomes worse when you are to wear the signature for more than 2 months

        The ICO project is better promoted through the signing campaign than through socializing campaigns (twitter and facebook). This would be the explanation for the stakes raised in the participants of the signing campaigns and the high percentage of the coins offered in the signing campaign. If you have a good bitcointalk rank, you do not even need a job. I am just a Member, but I like to participate in signing campaigns, being very profitable.

Gets a lot more targeted views than the social media bounties, social media bounties seem to be bots spamming 50 different bounties at a time.

I somehow agree with this. Before when bitcointalk doesn't have merit a simple day to day of being active in the forum can help your rank up. Rank up can lead to higher pay in bounty campaigns. But now we have merit it will take more effort than before to have a high rank. Which leads to small numbers of ranked members for campaigns.

The same reason why most signature nowadays has erasures of signature members leaving campaigns and shifting to other more promising campaigns.

I think this is because so many people when deciding on investing (icos or coins) read this forum and rely on the opinions of its regulars  ;)

because the users in this bitcointalk forum are their target to participate in their crowd sale. Many users here are investors and also those bounty hunters can be a potential investors as they have knowledge in dealing cryptocurrency and can hold their bounty token or can use it in daily trading to create a price movement.

because the signature campaign should not be more than one project followed, so one account may only follow one signature campaign, unlike other bounty campaigns, such as social media, translation, content creation, which can be more than one project, so it is reasonable to allocate signature campaign is bigger than the others

in addition, for the confidence of each project may also be determined by rank, higher ratings will enable other audiences to follow the project and start investing,

Yes, signing on the forum is a good way to advertise the project, as it is aimed at the right audience. But I still think it's more likely to attract bounty hunters than investors.
Perhaps those who have higher grades, things are different, because they have more trust.

I have seen many campaigns now that are alloting less percentage for signature campaign but their project is not getfing the required exposure and hype in the community so i think thaf signature campaign with high percentage is required to attract more forum.members and make the ico go viral and be noticed.

Yes because signature campaign is the bounty campaign which reaches out to the target customers of the ICOs and so must always be given the highest bounty pools.

because I think signature campaigns have more role to attract investors especially see the signatures used by legendary, social media many have fake account so make them have small allocation

Yes,it is and it has been discussed over many times already.But I like that point that bounty hunters also will invest on the ICOs yes that is true even many hunters invest on the potential project because they know what is the potential level of the project (supposed to be).

As a bounty hunter, I also noticed that signature campaign is mostly had the most allocated amount of funds among all bounty programs. I think it is simply because, public investors are usually seeking gopd ICOS to invest with in this bitcoin forum than on social media sites or ICO rating sites. Thats why signature campaigns had the most because it is only exclusive to post in this forum only.

Yes, of course worthy signature campaigns with a higher percentage than other campaigns. That's because with the signature campaign information related to the project can be directly seen by the forum members, so that the investor as the target of the advertisements that are in the forum get information about the project.

It's simply because i account can only join 1 signature bounty at one time and also the task is more than any type of bounty.
So, it's normal that signature bounty gives the best amount of reward

Cause here is the biggest crypto community. Not Twitter, not Facebook. People are searching where to invest, reading different opinions, whach how people support. So managers give more money for signature to expand projects here

Exactly the same sentiment that I have. Signature bounties should be given a big chunk of the payments. My experience so far is abysmal when it comes to being paid for the signature bounties that I joined in. I seldom get the good ones even with the rank that I am in. That is why there was a time I only stick to day trading, which I still do now.

This is definitely the most relevant channel. Everybody here in this forum is interested for the new crypto projects. Also, it takes more than a month to build up your forum level to even be able to participate in these campaigns.

Yes you are correct, I remember when I join social media bounty, most of my friends keeps asking me question after questions about the shares I do, most them even un-follow me because of the share i am making, but signature targets the right audience and will end up getting few people to invest or at least know about the project.

He wasnt complaining actually he is just saying he has realized why its important. Signature campaigns allows you focus on your target audience and also gives you marketers who are forced to be loyal since they can only wear that signature and they also become eventual stakeholders in the project as they will earn the token. So you get a win - win situation where you sell your project and build a community of people who wwill understand what the project is about since they are crypto enthusiasts.

What you are suggesting will just cause more spammers to join the forum. Already tons of newbies joining the forum just to spam their signature and earn as much as possible. Though the merit system is helping to counter new users from spamming the forum by joining signature campaign, still there are people that would go to different level to earn anything possible. Its better to assign a pool somewhere else to get better presence in the market.

Because posting articles isn't easy and given that you wear banners to promote the business model that you have. I'm very proud that bounty managers are smart to allocate each dividend in every pool especially Signature bounty.

I also think it deserves the highest pool. This forum is known by every crypto related people, and everybody here is to find informations about investments, technology, ... So I think it is wise to do the marketing, where it is 100% relevant to the audience.

Because signature is been done in bitcointalk and bitcointalk is a crypto related forum, everyone in this forum knows something a little about crypto currency and blockchain, so it is easy to market people here to make invest in your ICO then any other platform.

I also agree with you because the bitcointalk account can be used for only one particular campaign at a time but with the other forms of campaign you can join as many different campaigns as you want

signature is great because forum members are the most quality targeting people for a ico. its getting unlimited amount of views and its much better for ico owners. thats why some bounty managers are allocating 40% of total bounty money for signature campaign.

most likely it is this branch of the bounty is able to bring as much money. I don't think others attract as many investors

It is a good thing you were able to find out on your own how signature campaigns do have a huge impact on advertising a project.

Also, you have to understand that as a bounty signature campaign participant you are more like investing your space and time alone for that project for the period of time the ICO is on, which shows your belief in the project in the first place among every other project running their ICO. When compared with other forms of campaign (article, Twitter, Facebook, reddit etc)  where you can do multiple campaigns from different projects at once, with signature you are stuck with one at once.

In that case, you are taking a huge risk, since you either have to be prayerful the ICO ends up successful or you get nothing, or it does not turn out to be a scam which the latter can be averted though, if you do your due diligence.

I try to agree with this point because signature campaign is the most attractive platform to have. With almost all the users that joins in bitcointalk forum are a cryptocurrency investors not like facebook, twitter, instagram, and etc. So signature campaign must be given more allocation.

for me this is a great option for earning and besides all this bitcointalk is the largest platform for earning on cryptocurrency .

Very controversial statement! It seems to me that you should not rely on your personal subjective assessments of the situation, but trust in specific figures and facts. I think, in support of your theory, it is worthwhile to give a few diagrams with specific percentages of how the forum affects the advertising of a particular project among the target audience - that would be interesting to see!

I totally agree with you..
Signature campaign is advertising the said project, since every potential investor comes to bitcointalk.org, the easiest way to catch a glimpse of a project is through their signatures. Signature campaign participants should really be paid well.

That's a pretty good question, by the way. All due to the fact that people who wear these labels probably can be some big personalities on the forum.

The aim of bounty projects is to promote a project in the market. It happened that the majority of the crypto people are in this forum searching and looking for prijects to invest. Those people are the person of interest to invest on a particular project. It is on signafure campaign wherein this forum is the medium.