Bitcoin Forum

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Actually through other social media you may reach more people but signature campaign is more effective because you reach only those people who are totally involved in crypto world and are looking for suggestions and solutions to their queries.

because making reposts is much easier than participating in a signature.  because the signature needs to take a more active part.  so many people want to make money on social networks.  accordingly, the more people participate, the less the share of tokens you can get.

I think signature is more profitable because this is biggest forum about cryptocurrencies so many potential investors can be found here. Also less people join signature campaigns.

That is a very good question. I myself also wants to know that. I mean there is more hectic task associated with social media bounty then why the signatures are given bigger share. I think the rewards should be evenly distributed.

You have a completely wrong understanding of advertising ICO. At this forum, the target audience, while social networks, often, advertise the project among people who are not absolutely interested in blockchain. In addition, the presence of a signature worn by high-ranking participants in this forum is a kind of indicator of quality.

It's totally logic to be that way since BitCointalk is all about cypto niche, so every single post / exposure matters for real since all people in this forum  are PRO-Cryptos.

In social media your followers can be non-crypto fan so it's not like always a good go with social media marketing, that's why always the Signature campaign is always more than social media campaign.

To emphasize more on this
Signature campaign is all about simplicity and strength
And the forum has a lot of potential investors

Also, participants in signature are mostly low too

Because this is an international forum where we can see all the trending campaigns and other amazing projects. We can see all the platform of the project through this, some people don't bother to look in Twitter and Facebook for an amazing project.

If you can see that Signature Allocation is always 35-40%, it's really high and will make us a good income if ever we join to an amazing campaign. Also, there is a sudden increase of participants in the bounty so they prioritize the signature since we are here in the forum itself where we can change our signature, it's an unique feature of the forum.

That's because social media numbers can be easily obtained artificially by buying subscribers, while high-level btt accounts are limited in number. The scatcity gives higher value and reward.

Signature campaign is much more higher. Bitcointalk forum is the gate of all among cryptocurrency. Considered this as social media decentralized. Peopl in crypto space has a bright future towards it's goals. The higher the bounce the better. You should keep hodling buddy!

Okay why signature is way more bigger than social media?? I think Signature campaign introduce one campaign while social media campaign you can introduce alot of campaign in a single period of time. In signature campaign you need a lot of effort to hodl their banners and sharing some thoughts on different threads wearing their banner.

I think the reason why signature campaign has higher allocation than social media campaigns is because in signature campaign, people who see your posts and the signature you are wearing are the people who are involved and interested in cryptocurrency, most especially the investors, while in social media campaigns, yes it is true that many friends and followers can see our posts, but not all of them are interested and wiuld take time to check what the cryprocurrency or the ICO is about.

This is the epitome of targeted advertising.  Everyone here loves crypto and is willing to throw down on a good project to gain a better lifestyle.  Having your project plastered all over the site so it's a nice way to have a good ICO to get the funds you need to pull the project off.

There is much difference between reaching everybody and reaching those specifically involved and inclined to crypto. It is like going to talk with a mixed audience and you may also be sure if any of those in such audience understand crypto, that is talking about social media bounty. For signature bounty, you talk specifically and directly with those who understand cryptocurrency and are real crypto investors.

I have read most of the replies and most of them are correct about your question. One more reason why signature campaigns do have high allocations because people doing the signature campaign should spend time and effort in constructing valuable posts or replies to a certain topic that could potentially help out the community and the people who are new to crypto space. The level of task done is very different when it comes to social media campaigns. One reason as well is that there are only a few number of participants that is sharing the allocated stakes.

Everything is very simple here. Signature campaigns are usually always allocated a larger percentage of the pool than the social media campaign. Signature campaigns are always attended by fewer people.

bounty campaigns have different allocations. Social media bounty is good as messages can be relayed to people outside the crypto industry but might not have a lot of conversion rate as the target market isn't advertised to. in signature campaigns, the adverts are strictly for target market and it goes straight to the target audience as everyone that comes to this forum wants to know about cryptocurrency and its a potential investor, That is why the allocation of signature is always high

Social media might have bigger audience but most of them aren't crypto related unlike on posting into this forum itself where most of people are into crypto which means a wide chance on getting a potential investor.
Even from the start of time or into signature campaigns or bounties. Signature do have bigger allocation than on social medias and also doing between task is really different knowing that Social media task aren't that hard too.

I think to make you understand, check your social media followers, how many of them knows about crypto currency? I bet you that not up to 10% of your followers know about crypto currency, but I can assure you that, 99% of people here in bitcointalk knows a little about crypto currency and ICO's. so that''s why they give bitcointalk more allocation. 

Social media campaign have opportunity of reaching out to more people than signature judging with population facebook alone is enough i don't know reason proportion of pool given to signature is much it has been like that since i join bitcointalk.

Well, I that is your own way of looking at it. There will definitely be a difference in signature campaign and that of social media because there is difference in task that is required from the both. To be honest, it is not really easily to post something reasonable on btt unlike social media that will just require liking and sharing posts. Also to attain the rank to qualify for participating in signature campaign is not gotten easily.

in my opinion, this is because the bounty signature focus more with people where they are the ones who are interested in their own could even ICO as an investor. so the signature can be said the bounty more appropriate target in selling a token increase sales and project of the bounty on the other. so it's no wonder a larger allocation.

The only audience you reach on Twitter/social media are bots, shittalking shillers and no coiners. So not exactly the audience you want to reach.

Of course the most important thing is in this forum because it has been proven that we are crypto lovers and have guaranteed publications for the future of the project so that most people think that telling crypto users is the most appropriate and accelerating the promotion process, unlike many social media who knows that with crypto they may underestimate it, and the level of signing and social media work is very different, I believe that the most extra signatures really think in making constructive posts that are not reposted.

Because in social.media campaign the only thing you will do is share or repost it but in signature campaign you use your brain to share whats your best opinion you will give to threads in this forum. In signature we need a constructive answer in any thread we reply.

Not many people like to do signature campaigns because it is more work and you can only do 1 campaign at a time. Imagine joining a campaign lasting 3 months and then discovering that they didn't reach the soft cap. That would be a waste of 3 months work, whereas in social media you can join multiple campaigns.

In fact, the signature and social networks mostly attract new bounty participants, not investors. So they don't make much sense. But if to compare, then repost to do can all, and here is have high rank on forum and write good posts, to participate in discussions on forum can not all. Although it is not so difficult. Therefore, the signature is paid more.

Signature campaign has the high allocation to social media because bitcointalk forum is a crypto related forum and many people here in the forum might see the signature and invest in the ICO, unlike the social media,

The reasoning to that by bounty managers is that hot leads vs cold leads. In this forum where many people are already aware in cryptocurrency there is a higher probability that the signature will attract potential investors or even new bounty hunters in the ICO hence a hot lead. While in Social media campaigns even though there are many people to advertise the ICO most of them is ether really not interested specially in platforms such as Facebook and Twitter or they do not know what it hence the cold lead.

In my opinion, signature campaign is more higher rewards from social media bounties because it us more focus from advertising the said project ico by using their avatars and signature labels through out the community. Here in this forum there are many investors are looking for a great project to invest. The more users they saw wearing those signature it means a lot for an investors that it is a great project.

Direct marketing to your main audience is better than peppering social media to people who may not even know what crypto is.  The signature campaign is also much more difficult to complete.  I bet the signature campaign sells more coins that Facebook and Twitter combined. 

maybe because the "signature" is on a platform that specifically discusses crypto, so users are automatically people who like crypto so marketing a project will be better.

It is because the signature can be more effective in promoting to investors. Investors should get the information mostly in crypto forum. So the possibility to get investors through signature campaign will be bigger than social media.  

Actually its not that way. The reason why you can get more in signature campaign than social media is the number of participants. Some of the ICO are allocating 10-15% for the signature campaign and 20% in social media.

No doubt bitcointalk is a crypto forum, it is strictly crypto currency and blockchain related forum and community, so this is a right place to do your bounty campaign because anyone seeing your signature will check it out and probably invest in the ICO

I think there are two reasons for this. The first reason is that you should write post about only certain topics in the biggest forum site in the crypto world for the signature campaigns. And at the same time you can only join a signature campaign. But there is no such restriction in social media campaigns.

In social campaigns, much less action and knowledge is required. Also there is less target audience, unlike this forum. In signature s campaigns you need to spend much more effort and time.

I think its because of the effort and to filter most bounty hunters. For the efforts, you'll have to be posting in different forums for the signature campaign, doing this will be more effort than just sharing a post from social medias. And for filtering bounty hunters, like what I said first, it requires more effort so that lazy bounty hunters or those who do many bounties can only participate on signature campaign, but if a bounty hunter had several Bitcointalk accounts, then it will all change, but I think bitcointalk has a way of finding multiple accounts having the same IP address.

maybe the signature is more profitable than social media because in social media there are not many people who know about crypto, bro, if using signatures there are likely to be many investors who see, so the gift for signatures is greater than social media

The forum has a much larger target audience, from which many are ready to invest in projects. Also signature campaigns require much more effort than in social campaigns.

Because the signature activity was conducted on the BTT forum, this is first of all a respect for the forum, and the second forum is a concentration camp for encryption enthusiasts. The advertising campaigns on the forums are the most targeted, and the advertising efficiency on social media is not as efficient as the ad

yes it has become a habit from the past, the signature is bigger than the social media, because one person can follow social media several times, in contrast to the signature can only be followed once.

You're right! In addition to that, most of the participants in signature campaigns are high ranking accounts who devoted much of their time already in cryptocurrency. Also, the coverage which is the forum targeted all involve in cryptocurrency.

Signature campaigns help promote successful e-money projects. It introduces directly to the players. The distribution of signatures is always higher than social media. Also, when you sign up for a good signature campaign, you will receive a bonus.

     Maybe it is because signature campaign is more on academical approach when we make a reply or quoting in this forum and it is done with the best of our knowledge, just to elaborate the topic requested by our co-member. So maybe this is their basis of apportionment of tokens .

I think each bounty has determined many tokens that they will allocate as rewards. If the participant's campaign is a bit, it will certainly get a lot of coins. Most bounties use stake to calculate the amount of our reward. If we get a little stake, there are also a few coins that we will receive. In the signature campaign, Sr. Members upwards will be paid with a large stake every week.

In signature campaign you can participate only with one account at the same time while in social media campaigns
you can participate in multi campaigns (some of them participate in more than 100 campaigns at the same time).
Signature ranks are not easily achievable especially after introduction of merit system and signature campaign participants
are more involved in Crypto and they are very often investing as well.

You are right, social media campaigns have a wider range of information than signature campaigns. However, information targets in social media campaigns are still random and only a small part can be said to be right on target because not everyone involved in social media understands crypto. In contrast to the signature campaign in the forum that is all involved in the crypto world and it is considered more targeted.

Social media is mostly for meeting and connecting with people all around the world, social media is not really a crypto based platform, so promoting bounty on the social might not be targeting the right people and most of them don't know anything about cryptos, but it's not the same with bitcointalk.

I think Signature campaign are always higher than other campaigns due to the promotions and different advertisements of lots of projects on this platform. Also, the fact that signature campaigns do not really have much people as one cannot join a signature campaign twice gives it a higher reward.

It is not always the case. There are some ICO's that allocate less to signature campaigns. Anyway, I think it is usually higher for most campaigns because the target audience are all crypto enthusiasts unlike in social media.

So much good reasons why signature is the best way to earn a bounty token. One is that Bitcointalk is a very popular forum with millions of traffics visited by users who are investors in crypto currencies every month. They go here to validate and research some of the great projects that are going to launch. Social media sites are solely for socializing and not for promoting sites and ICOS, Bitcointalk can be used to promote and using signatures-like banners to represent ht ICO you are supporting.

IMO, signature bounty campaign got the highest allocation among all the campaign is because you engage more on the crypto enthusiast that are looking for possible project to invest in. Besides that if you participate in signature campaign you only focus on that particular ICO unlike if you participate in social media wherein you can have multiple participation.

I think the allocation that given to the signature campaign is equivalent to what is done by bounty hunters. usually, signature campaign requires a longer time and also does heavier tasks as stated in the rule. that way I think that's normal if the signature campaign provides a big allocation than others.

The first thing is the targeting, in signature campaign your advert is visible only to targeted audition, because everyone in this forum IS INTO crypto. Second thing is to build your members rank in the forum, which is much harder then building 3000 followers in twitter for example. And third thing is that you can participate only in one signature campaign at a time, while twitter and facebook, allows you to earn even from 20 different campaigns at the same time.

Signature campaigns is usually allocated with a high stakes because this forum itself has potentials investors who view and research on the ICOs and most members here really  know the modus operandi of cryptos and how to invest in it better than those in the social media and higher proportion of people do obtain more information about the ICOs here.

This is very easy to understand, for several reasons：

1.You can only participate once in the signature campaign, but you can participate in many bounty campaigns at the same time as Twitter and Facebook.
2.All members of the BTT Forum are players of crypto, which are more effective than Twitter and Facebook.
3.BTT rank is very difficult to upgrade, you need merit, and the well-known merit is not so easy to get. Low rank participants can't get too many stakes.And Twitter and Facebook can easily have a large number of followers.
4.The difficulty of signature campaign is also much more difficult than that of Twitter campaign. The difficulty of replying posts 10+ per week is much higher than that retweets 3-5 weekly.
5.The number of participants in Social Mediad is usually much larger than the number of signing bounty participants, so Social Mediad participants can allocate stakes will become very small.

This is because ICOs that are being run are based on cryptocurrency investments and most of the crypto related people are in this forum so it would be wise enough to campaign in this community so that cryptopreneurs can invest into it rather than just sending it to the outside world who don't know much about crypto investments.

in the signatures, it is easier to understand about good projects to be followed, while for social media only people understand who knows about this project From that the rewards for social media projects are smaller in return

For the signature campaign, more funds are allocated, and fewer people participate than in social networks. I think, because of this, the reward in the subscription campaign is higher.

Because in the signature campaign we help promote the ICO project that we follow into the forum where, seekers, investors, and everyone who joins cryptocurrency and understand it about cryptocurrency. Whereas in social media, indeed we help develop ICO projects for people, but some of them must be indifferent because they do not know what you are sharing and for what you are sharing.

It's actually about the effort that you gave in marketing an ICO that's why it's higher than any other campaign.

I also thought so, but I saw that the signature campaign had more patents than social media, although basically through social media we were reaching more people who saw it, and there were also bounties whose social media campaigns were bigger than signature campaigns.

Yes, you are right
because everyone in this forum is people who are interested in crypto while not all of them on social media are crypto fans, so the signature campaign is considered better and more effective for advertising the project, therefore the results for the signature campaign are bigger ,rules about social media are also easier because we only repost or retweet while in the signature campaign we have to make constructive and quality posts

Signature campaign is the best way to campaign a crypto-based project. because bitcoin forum is the place of their who interested in crypto world. on the other hand, social media ( Twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc) is the place for any kind of people. there have not may any crypto interested person. so signature campaign is always high.

Well I agree to them that signature campaign earns more than social media campaign because everyone who are involved in crypto is here in this forum.While in social media it gives impact also but not everyone who is in your friendlist are into crypto.Also signature campaign also contributes to this forum especially if all your post are with quality and sense.

I think not all campaign are focused in signature campaign.
there are bounties that are no signature camps.
there are bounties who give allotment to that like just 10 percent and social media gets 30 percent.
there are different portion in different bounties.
but to be honest, in average signature camps get higher parts.

Well, obviously if you do signatures then you are doing advertisements for all people here in the community that already knows about it. While it social media there are only less people who are interested about this.

It takes a lot of time to sign, but social media is much simpler. The time of signing should be many times that of social media.

I think the signature campaign is higher than social media because this forum is crypto enthusiasts, therefore the signature campaign is higher than social media because overall social media is not only Krypton enthusiasts

The analysis is very comprehensive, these are the reasons for signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media, in addition, I add that bitcointalk's high-rank signature is very profitable, usually a legendary account is 10 times the income of a jr.member.

I believe that this is completely justified and right, that for the signature of the award is much more than for social networks.  Many members of this forum have been participating here for more than 5-6 years and deservedly have high ranks.  Many listen to them.  When I was a newbie and just learned how to choose a campaign bounty, I looked at the signature of high-ranking members, and studied these campaigns and then joined them.

Social media is where "normies" are (which is who we need for crypto to go mainstream), but the core audience for blockchain projects is on this forum. This is the front line to public exposure and where most of the experts hang out (I'm not one).

people in this forum mostly are engage in crypto. while many people in the social media don't engage in crypto and don't even know it. even if ICOs can reach many people in social medial it is still useless if they are not interested in it. people in this forum are interested in crypto so they can be a potential investor.

It because the signature is posted in this forum and we all know that almost all user in this forum is a investor. Investor attrack ico that see in every post especially if the post is very constructive

we cannot attract laypeople without any proper knowledge to invest in ICO, most of ICO investors are crypto enthusiast who used to know any updates related to cryptocurrency, and they were old player. due to lack oportunity developer have in tokensale, they will tend to do marketing campaign in crypto enthusiast area. so it will be more effective. because many whales and big investors are around here. so signature campaign will always has biggest allocation for bounty

Because with the help of the subscription campaign more attention is attracted than from other social networks. If you wear a signature all your previous messages become with this signature.

Just check out number of participants in twitter and compare to signature. While you lead just 1 signature you take countless social bounties. That's the difference. It is obvious.
moreover social bounties don't have any impact

For me i think. The projects target are the people around this forum.
why? first almost all of the people around here are associated with crypto.
and yes they are possible holders of major cryptocurrency. the marketing strategy with signature.
is actually telling those people that they are here. and they could support the bounty.
its like a selective marketing. its like selling hotdogs to hotdog lovers.

but with social media bounty. it is possible they could find some investor around.
but its not that big compared to the people whos around the forum that could actually be investors.

Signature campaigns on the bitcointalk forums will reach the right target audience and search easier than the Social Media campaign.

The signature campaign is not an easy thing compared with social media. You need to have a constructive post and informative ideas to be able to share with others especially to newcomers. Besides a thousand of members here in forum bounty hunters and investors who will read your posts and can see the signature you are wearing will attract more investors and will to try to reach the site and see if the projects we are promoting is for good or not before trying to invest.

I think signature campaign is more powerful then others because in social media there are different categories of people but in forum there is only the traders and the people who is related to crytpo trading are there so it is more eaiser way to get connected to the people related Icos and work of crypto currencies.

Campaign manager allocate more stakes to those signature campaign participants because that's the best way on how they could introduce their projects to the market. While the participants are posting on different threads, they also wear the signature of the particular ICO project.

Because the signature campaign require you must have writing skills and ranks to participate. It is more complex than social media campaigns, so its reward is higher is reasonable thing

In my opinion, social campaigns are not as effective as a signature campaign. Beginners and learn about ico will participate in the forum and they will feel confident when the high rank members are signed on 1 ico. The current media is quite thin, and most are non-quality ads.

I agree with the previous commentators - the signature company is designed for a narrower range of people interested directly in cryptocurrencies.  Social networks, although they have more coverage, do not affect so many potential investors.

Signature campaign can only be done through bitcointalk form. The bitcointalk forum is the largest community of the crypto investors. As a result of this, bitcointalk forum is the largest platform through which a project can be promoted.  Through the signature of the promoting members, investors that are willing can know more about such project.
Signature campaign is not as porous as that of social media where anyone can just open account whenever they like and it is ready for you.
Also, social media is more of bounty hunters than investors.

In signature campaign you wear an avatar and signature of the campaign to promote and gather an investor for  the project that you joined. In social media of course is also to promote but not that like in signature because the big investor and almost all people that having an interest in crypto currency will be here in forum. That's the reason why signature campaign are having a high percentage of rewards than social media campaign.

Yes, the signature campaign commonly gets higher rewards than the social media. Firs is about its involvement in which the signature participants must have qualified posts in the bitcointalk forum only. The posts must be qualified and on topic as stated in the rules. Additionally, it obligates the participants to wear the signature, personal text, or avatar during the bounty campaign or ICO. Therefore, I think signature participant is suitable to get higher rewards.

Thats a good analysis but I don't think you are right about the participation number. If you are talking about the BTC based signature campaigns then surely they will have high participation because people get paid in the form of BTC which is direct payment method and it is also very much trusted.

Apart from this if you talking about the bounties then I dont think there is high numbered participation in them because bounties are too many and people can join only one campaign at a time.

Social media participation are always higher. Thats my observation and its true I guess.

Do you know why signature more relatively given high proportion on bounty campaign? It is because the target audience. Its plays a big role and most of the part you are on a crypto sphere with lots of potential investors talking about cryptocurrency. Unlike on social media not all of the audience are aware what cryptocurrency and how to invest. So quality over quantity you know the math.

I agree. There are thousands of altcoin investors here in this forum who are more knowledgeable about cryptocurrency than those person on your friends on your social media accounts. Besides, how many of those friends are seeing your post about the ICO you are endorsing? I believe that only 5% to 10% of your friends can only see your post and there is a small chance that they will invest to that ICO. Signature campaign have lesser participants but reaches higher numbers of investors because of this forum.

Why the signature allocation is always higher than other? It is because their main target investors is bitcointalk users. Bitcointalk is on of the oldest and best Bitcoin forum, ETH and other great successful cryptocurrencies was born here.

Active members of the forum participate in the discussion of different topics and give advice in different posts, the higher the rank of the participant the more confidence it causes in other users, among whom there are many investors and traders, so the signatures of such members of the forum cause trust and attract attention.Therefore, signature campaigns are considered very profitable, they are targeted at attracting the attention of potential investors and advertising projects.

Because the signature works among people who already have to do with the crypto currency.

I think that  it is because the work is usually more tedious, and you spend way more time carrying out tasks for signature bounty campaigns. In addition, the forum has a larger audience that is reached, and this may be why people who partake in signature bounties tend to have the highest stakes allocated to them.

Now the companies can catch easily users having promised them for a coin subscription. Usually these coins cost nothing. These are only a figures on the monitor. Few companies put heart and soul and energy in the projects.

Social Media reaches a lot of people but signature reaches potential investors here on this platform. Also, signature campaigns are difficult to do as compared to social media. With the signature, you post daily, to get accounts is uneasy. But with social media, getting followers these days is very easy. Signature reach potential investors than social media I think.

You get a targeted audience using the Signature campaign. Also, people can participate in Multiple Social Media campaigns but only one Signature Campaign at a time.

And most of the times, the percentage allotted to Social Media campaigns is more. But, when the stakes are divided you receive less tokens for Social Media and more for Signature campaigns as less people participate in Signature campaigns.

Because advertising in the signature occurs on the forum with people who already have a relationship with the crypto currency, and in social networks it is not always so.

signature campaign is similar to forum ads thats why the allocated bounty pool is higher than the social media. every where you commented on these forum the ads sticks to you. and more crypto minded people are been reached here with the signature ads.

You can participate in 100 social media campaigns at the same time, while only in 1 signature campaign. This should be the reason that media campaigns has far more participants than signature campaigns.

Always what? Greater than? (I guess so). Anyway, I already get your point ;D.

In my opinion, signature campaigns have a bigger reward compare to social media campaigns because it provides heavier load of work since you are creating posts meticulously compare to social media campaigns where all you have to do is to share and put hashtag sometimes. The conclusion, the harder the work, the higher the reward.

And because of this one, sir KobbyC nailed it.
For example, as a teacher, there's a greater chance of educating people even only from a bunch of interested listeners compare to a crowd of uninterested ones. I know there's a saying that "Every drop counts" but quantity doesn't matters the most all the time.

I think that they usually make it that the signature percentages are higher because the work done is usually more, and a wider or targeted audience is reached. There are a good number of investors on this platform, and a lot of them come here to get certain information. So signature bounty hunters usually get more stakes from carrying out tasks.