Bitcoin Forum

So is everyone allowed to post their ponzi scheme garbage in the general forum or just Atlas?

This is for charity so it's a little different.

It's a ponzi scheme that you claim will result in you donating bitcoins to charity if some criteria are met that you are hesitant to quantify. 

Shall we run through your list of projects on this forum that you never finished?
Linking the BTC economy with Team Fortress 2 Hats.
Raising funds for a private army.
Soliciting donations to run an anti Obama ad.
Soliciting donations to run a bitcoin ad on the Alex Jones show.
Claiming to launch a self defense weapon company.
Claiming to develop some middleman fantasy device you named after anime money.
...and I know there are more.


Or we can talk about how you are always asking for loans from people on this forum.  Or how you make bets then back out of them when you realize you've lost.  Or how you've abandoned several identities on these forums to avoid your past performance.

Jalum, I think it's time to relax and look at the big picture. I haven't hurt anybody.

You backed out of a 100 BTC bet after it was clear you lost.  You hurt the victor of that bet to the tune of $300-400 (at the time).  I'm confident that if you had won that bet and the other party didn't pay you, you'd feel they robbed you of value/stole from you. 

Hahaha. I did not clearly lose. People just stated semantic loopholes.

Matthew, I'm fine. My words can just as easily be ignored and passed down to the bottom of the forum. If anything, I bring great value to this forum. I'm patient, understanding and I happen to express myself freely. If you don't like the way I am, you can go your own way. It's that simple.

You're not going to change me. You're not going to make me submit to your preference. I accept you as you are and I hope you can do the same for others.

Someone seems a little full of themself...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48178.0

You asked for something to be proven.  You said you would pay someone 100 BTC if they could prove it.  Someone proved it, logically and factually.  Then you closed the thread and deleted your account.

Because that's what people do when they know they're right: they lock the thread and delete their account.

There's at least one person on here who appreciates my presence. If not, fuck it. I like engaging others alone.

Nobody did. I won't be addressing this any further.

I think your opinion sucks.

Matthew, I am happy. I have nothing to prove. I aim to provide value when I can and I inevitably do.

Please understand your attempts at providing wisdom are in vain. Now learn to accept yourself, others and the world as they are. That's all I wish to offer.

As long as you ignore all my posts when I'm enraged or depressed.


Which is why I never make threads entitled:

This is how the weak are protected in a free society.
99%, 53%, 1%, Black, White - It's all retarded.
If you want to have slaves...
Here are the facts...
The Liberal "Grown-up" Mentality
The top 1% was never really the top 1%...
From the people who predicted the 2008 crisis: The most important message...


No, don't ask me to explain how I provide value, it's inevitable!


But ignore all that when I'm criticizing the libtard sheeple about their inability to see that flouridated water is part of the sterilization process put into place by the central banking cabal.

I haven't been depressed in a long time. I never get angry.

What's your objective, Jalum?

In this thread?  I'd like to get this thread (and all your other ponzi scheme threads under your other accounts) moved to the gambling forum where they belong.

Yes, that person is your bipolar twin, which in turn, is linked to the same oversized and undereducated ego.

The only people who appreciate your presence on this forum are SomethingAwful goons who are on here to mock you. Everyone else here is bored of you.

I'm the former though moving on to the latter.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4393.0

Everybody gets angry sometimes.


v "Never"

Yeah, that was one instance. I prefer not to be angry though.

I know for a fact that SomethingAwfull appreciates the loving out of Atlas's posts. Evidence in how much time they devote to him. Good luck with the gambly thingy.

Heh. I had several people tell me what a great friend I was the other day. I have a date lined up this Sunday. Life tells me that I am a valuable person. Matthew, you have no idea who you're dealing with. I don't know what you are trying to gain but, frankly, your ruse is very immature for a gentleman of your stature. You're better than this.

Heh. Thanks, Rassah.

Most of my friends aren't online, Matthew. I don't know if you can say the same.

Why is my mental health in question again? Heh.

My goodness, there are so many things said here that I want to quote and mock. Good thing I have to be somewhere soon.

Atlas, you should stop listing every time someone compliments you or orgasms out of admiration for you. It makes you sound desperate.

I don't understand why the Bitcoin community embraces scams like Ponzi schemes so enthusiastically.  Crap, theymos had (still has?) a link to a Ponzi scheme in his sig for the longest time.  It's just sad.  And letting one of the least reliable forum posters run one in the main forum for "charity" is beyond embarrassing. 

Fixed that for you.

Fixed that fixed that for you.

Oh, I know you think you're reliable.  That's because you're delusional, which is part of the reason you're such a hopeless fuck-up.  The last time I asked you why people would believe you would carry out the work you proposed doing in light of your 0% follow-through record in the past, you said that you truly believed in the project and would never stop fighting for something you believed in.  Within about six hours, you had closed the thread and cancelled the project.  

What's sad is that the admins here have witnessed your countless failures and lies but choose to do nothing to protect those who might not be aware of your history.  I guess pro-Bitcoin zealotry outweighs honesty and ability.

Hey, if he pays back the money, who cares? People shouldn't be investing in or lending to anyone before they research them, anyway. It's as if Giraffe is implying everyone but him are gullible idiots.

I don't recall a single time I've failed. I've found things that don't work but failure? Hah. I haven't cost anybody anything.

Now they are going to say you cost them their time, brain cells, and IQ points, when they're the ones clicking on and reading your posts  ::)

Having an idea, collecting funds to make a go at it and then having to return them all is a failure. Failture does not make you unreliable everyone has failures and those who don't admit to having failed at any point are beyond delusional.

I'd call deleting accounts and changing names a ton of times unreliable.

Time and again you have proposed projects that you have failed to complete.  Most times you have failed to take any action at all.  Your reputation is nothing but failure.

If someone opens a restaurant but doesn't make any food, that's a failure.  Yes, they could have also robbed people who came in to eat, but that's hardly an accomplishment.  It's sad that you can only defend your reputation by pointing out the times you could have stolen from people, but didn't.  

Maybe he should be diagnosed as a crazy stalker.



wait, that's someone else

This is a horrible idea.  I've been around on the internet long enough to know it's not a good idea to call some 17 year old you stalk online.  This kind of damaging behavior from people like you who think "psychology" gives you the right to meddle in the lives of others as if you really understood them is far too common, all you do is "destroy minds and reduce man to a robotized and drugged state."

This thread was surreal enough without someone channelling L. Ron Hubbard.

Delusions work like that Atlas. In your eyes, I can believe that you don't recall a single time you have ever failed. In everyone else's eyes, we can all recall many times that you have failed - that is because we are not suffering from the same delusions as you are ;)

If you read the rules for Ponzi and still think it's a scam, you're an idiot.  It's a voluntary activity.

I still think it's funny that everyone here and on SA, including Matthew, are trying to "change" or "fix" Atlas. Can't be done. You can't change people even if you call their parents. But it's entertaining to watch you all try.

Call my parents. I dare you. You could give me no greater pleasure.

You're a really creepy guy.  This is an internet slapfight.  Leave it on the internet.

Giving money to Nigerian princes and joining Amway is also voluntary.  That doesn't make either any less of a scam.  Scams that prey on people's natural stupidity and greed don't stop being scams simply because the mark isn't robbed at gunpoint.

Nigerian princes promise something that they can't deliver. I don't.
Amway is a perfectly legitimate business by my standards (or at least the concept of Amway -- how they operate is an entirely different matter...).
Some people win, others lose.  Gambling as a whole "preys on people's natural stupidity and greed."  That doesn't make it morally wrong.
I'm tired of arguing with people like you.

So, are you saying slot machines, Black Jack, Roulette, State Lottery, and all other forms of gambling are a scam? In this "ponzi" everyone is aware of what it is and what the chance of payout is. How is this not just a Ponzi style lottery?

+1. You nailed it.

"Mr and Mrs Goldstein! Hello, my name is Matthew, I'm with the South Korean police and I've been reading your son's posts on the internet. DID YOU KNOW your son is unstable and makes all these UNTRUE claims about unrecognized imaginary internet money?

No, I haven't formally opened up a case, I've just been reading these forums on my own time...

Well YES, I am a grown man. Wh...

Now you hold it right there. I MAJORED in child psychology! I can diagnose your kid with...

Hello? Hello? DAMMIT I WILL CALL INTERPOL ON THESE ABUSIVE PARENTS!"

Bitcoins: Free from banks, not from stalkers.

That's creepy as fuck you want to get involved in that dudes personal life, and threatening state intervention is gross.

Arguing with me is voluntary, therefore you must enjoy it.

The gambling analogy is a good one.  Gambling can be done fairly, but not all gambling is fair.  Let's say I create a game with complicated rules that pays out well at first to draw people in but eventually just takes everyone's money, that is a scam.  But just because that game is unfair doesn't make poker a scam.  See, some things are scams and some things aren't.  Ponzi schemes are scams.  Puppies are not.  Nigerian prince emails are scams.  Hugs from your grandma are not.

If you publicly told everyone that your game would pay out more to those who played first, it won't be a scam. Scam implies you are telling people something that is untrue. No one is hiding anything here. Sending money to someone in Nigeria after they tell you they just need money and won't pay you back isn't a scam either.

Yeah, I publicly admit that people LOSE MONEY ON PONZI.  They can also win.
This full disclosure makes ponzi NOT A SCAM.

You don't see me calling ineedausername a scammer because I could lose nearly 67 BTC at any moment. I am fully aware of what I got into. He has classified nothing about his game.

Ponzi is far from a scam. It's gambling but not a fraudulent scam.

A Charity Ponzi? X that gives X to help a person or organization and Y that screws people out of Y shouldn't be in the same sentence. They cancel each other out!

I never thought I would see someone defend ponzi schemes like this. Holy shit, you people really don't know anything about economics, do you?

Funny how you phrase it like that, with a generic statement that applies to every type of gambling and investment.  That's Scamming 101.  "Folks, I can't guarantee you'll get rich on this.  You could technically lose your money.  But that's life:  you've got to spend money to make money!"

Full disclosure?  That generic statement is not full disclosure.  Full disclosure in a Ponzi scheme would be maintaining an updated listing of how many people have paid in so far, how many more have to pay in for the previous group to collect and how many MORE will have to pay in for you to collect.  No Ponzi schemes do this because people would stop putting their money once the numbers point to collection being nearly impossible. 

But since you're obviously very interested in running an honest operation, I'm sure you'll want to include this information for people to make an informed decision before joining...

You can already see how many people paid in.  Since you do not realize this, you have obviously not even attempted to take a rational look at my site.  Arguing without knowing what you're talking about makes you look like an idiot.
The other two suggestions you make are actually good ideas, they'd help people make informed decisions.  I'll try to get them implemented soon.  However, you can already calculate these figures from the site's public listings.
Also, I'd like to note that late in a Ponzi game, people are betting that either they'll get the large jackpot or that they'll get paid out because the game will go on for a very long time due to the large jackpot.

As a public relations expert I would suggest one of the problems you are having is one of perception.  Since you have named your game after a fraudulent and illegal investment scheme associated with criminals such as Bernie Madoff, people are assuming out of ignorance that your game is similar to the fraudulent activities of other individuals.

I would suggest dropping those references from your site and focusing on the BitConduit brand as the name of the game.  You still maintain full disclosure of the rules and payments of course.  I personally believe all pure chance gambling should be illegal, but since like poker this is a game of skill where you interpret the actions of others it is a little less problematic.

Just realized that "Ponzi" is mentioned in the Rules.  I've tried to keep the use of the term to unofficial discussions, but not in advertising and webpages.  Thanks for the tip.

If only pure chance games were illegal, would people just add some teensy unimportant skill element to otherwise pure chance games?

Which is why the gif in your signature advertising your scheme has Ponzi in it. Right.

By law competition organisers used to have to do this here so that it didn't compete with state run lotteries.  They usually required you to answer a question in addition to submitting your tokens/coupons/whatever.  One state used to have a law which stated that you couldn't require a purchase in order for someone to enter a competition so people from that state got one free entry.

I sent Matthew my parent's phone number. Heh.

This thread needs to be [CLOSED - due to lack of rationality].

We'll have 4 channers here before the week is out at this rate.

Bitcoinduit is just as illegal as playing Monopoly.

If things were as easy as that, then why are numbers rackets illegal?

It inhibits the state's ability to collect their share. They rather see the poor spending money on booze and paying a sales tax than have them gamble it away. In addition, they want a monopoly on their "official" lotteries.

Anyways, in general, it's for the same reasons that harmless drugs and victimless crimes are made illegal. The state has never made law on what's right. They make law to sustain and grow themselves along with their true constituents.

So do you pay income tax on your ponzi winnings?

I'll tell you when you scan and upload a copy of your tax filings.

So you speak German now?

Do you have jurisdiction over his country since you are in South Korea ? Honestly, are you hoping to get him into foster care as his parents are not up to the task ? LOL. Take a chill pill mate.

You may want to call them now, Matthew. It's getting a bit late.

Dude, grow up. This is getting pathetic, and you are getting down to his level, if not way lower.

No, please keep this up. This is highly entertaining. Both of you seem willing to entertain, so let the entertainment commence :)

Heh. We're all friends here even though some may disagree.

I thought it was entertaining, until it got sad and pathetic.

...lie, cheat, steal and break the law...

For the record, I have committed none of these things and my strawman is not listed as Immanuel Ortega.

Yep. Because the BEST way to fix things or convince people of things is to tell them "You are wrong!" and "You fucked up!" I though you were a psychology major? Or did you literally mean just a major and not a graduate?

This is just getting creepy. Heh.

I thought you said you were a psych major? You should know that NO ONE who threatens suicide actually ever does it, and those who do feel so alone they never tell anyone. That's practically psych 101. At most he's guilty of being an attention whore  ::)

Oh, also, totally sucks that SA locked their Bitcoin threat to be private only. I didn't even know they talked about me on there till recently.

If anything, Matthew, you are on your way to being sued for defamation. I've never threatened suicide on here.

However, I was suicidal at some points in my life. I won't deny that but to classify that as threats is slander. I have every damn right to express my feelings as they are.

Surprised no one else jumped on this, but:


You just admitted that Bitcoin is play money.

There you go, misinterpreting his post, moving the goalposts and contradicting your own previous statements.

So Atlas is going to pay bitcoins for a bit-lawyer to bit-sue a bit-troll and put the bit-troll in bit-prison for bit-slander? Ahahahaha...

Sued for defamation of character? Ahahahaha. Nobody is more guilty of defamation of your character than your good self Atlas.

Are you going to contact Interpol and get Matthew returned to the US for calling a spade a spade? How is your understanding of the Korean legal system? ;D

[edit] Just for the record, I find Matthew creepy as fuck. Carry on. :)

Huh? You sure that you have the right person? The authorities would have been contacted if I had seen that, since I happen to have all of Atlas' information.

You should seriously consider dropping that point. Suicide is too touchy of a subject to remind someone of, especially if they've gotten over it.

Ahh yes, the man who by his own words is picking on a mentally unstable youth.  So big, so brave.

Honestly, do you have anything better to do?  Or do you go the extra mile to demonstrate how much of a douche you are?

You know what, you don't gotta answer.

I already know   ;D

How's that? Tell me how I've misinterpreted the post. Explain how Atlas saying bitconduit is just as legal as monopoly (a board game where nothing of actual value is at stake, and you use a fake currency) can be construed any other way except that bitcoins do not count as real money. Or do you consider monopoly money to be a real form of currency?

Also, what goal posts did I move? How did I contradict myself? Did you even quote the right person?

Holy fucking shit Matthew, what the hell is wrong with you.  Just drop this shit.  Take your own advice,

They lock the forums about once a month in an attempt to get people to register.  It will be open again soon.

And holy shit.  I come back from work and this thread has really gone down the rabbit hole.

FFS Matthew, take a break from obsessing about Atlas and go prepare some tough questions for your interview with MagicalTux.

I doubt that me or anyone else saying "no" would make the slightest bit of difference to whether or not you're going to continue obsessing over Atlas.  Whether you want to rescue him, punish him or a bit of both, this is one drama I suspect is going to play out to an inevitably bitter end.

Wow. I'm all for having drama for drama's sake. But this is getting wayyyyyyy to far into obsessive stalker territory. And I say this as a goon, an anon and a bernd (so i'm not exactly one of the "nice guys" on the net).

If you were doing this to Atlas in real life, Matthew, he could get a restraining order against you faster than you could say "Ohay guys, what's with the handcuffs?"

I've seen way more internet detecting and doxing of fellow members here than I've ever seen on SA, to be honest. 

It was way worse in the early days on SA. I'm an original '01 and we were Matthew-style creepy back then, with what people found out about and did to other people. We've become much more civilized since then.

Okay. Lesson 1: Stop bothering people IRL.

There is no lesson 2.

Why on earth aren't you asking 4 chan if you're a channer?  They're still into internet detection, doxing people and harassing them in real life.  They'd probably track down whatever you wanted to know just for shit and giggles.

Matthew, since this is what you do for a living, please post your supervisor's phone number.

lol I'm glad you take this as seriously as I do ;)

Am I the only one who finds Matthew's almost romantic ("I care about his well being so much!") obsession with Atlas to be creepier than Bruce's (alleged) obsession with Thai boys? (Or my obsession with naked Chester pics on coffee tables?)

Matthew, I'll give you one final chance before you embarrass yourself.

I haven't aggressed against nor defrauded a single individual. You have nothing on me. I am absolutely spotless. However, what you are doing here can only tarnish your record.

Feel free to reconsider your decisions and plans at any time. You can't hurt me but you can certainly hurt yourself.

You two are just making it worse for the both of you. Have you considered calling each other to resolve this?

Matthew, what you're doing in this thread is a low blow. You are already aware of my opinion about it.

Atlas, Matthew seems like a nice person, and since he's giving his time away to you so freely, you should consider taking advantage of his free counseling when he calls you. Otherwise, try finding someone in real life to help you out. You need to get out of this state of denial.

This post does not represent the opinion of the moderation staff of Bitcointalk.org.

Considering you can't call my parents, I beg to differ  ;D

Also, bonus points for Don Quixote reference.

Maged, you're wrong.

Show me one victim of my purported crimes.

Considering ones mental state is VERY subjective, I'll say you're both wrong. And insane.

It depends how you class victim. You could say that the person who had to jump through hoops to get their refund after donating BTC to one of your failed projects was a victim. You could say that the person who won your 'Win 100BTC No Questions Asked' thread was a victim when you refused to pay them and you closed the thread. You could say anyone who has wasted time working with you on your many projects are victims, sucked in by your 'vision'.

Asking me for 'proof of victims' without commenting about your denial also adds weight to the proof that you are in total denial. Think about it ;)

They didn't jump through any hoops. They didn't even bother to send me an email. All they did was call for my attention by making new threads. That is not how you ask for a refund. I refunded him immediately once I happened to catch the mess he was making. I was the victim. He falsely tarnished my reputation. He made it look like he had personally contacted me for a refund when he had not.

Nobody won that thread. So moot point.

Nobody has committed to working with me on one of my projects.

No victims.

I'm a victim. I'm still waiting for that BTC you owe me for that "Whoever posts last" thread where you kept changing the rules in retrospect so you wouldn't have to pay out.

Semantic loopholes are disingenuous. You're no victim. You're just a conniving fraud.

No victims.

So I've officially been recognized as a Bitcoiner.   :D

Similarities are mere coincidence:

Monty Python - The Argument Sketch - Live at the Hollywood Bowl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL9oA1LFoMw)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojrQq6yc_2w (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojrQq6yc_2w)

Maybe try 64 point font and italics next time, it'll make it even more real to you.

I don't think you're as bad as many would imply, and certainly don't deserve Matthew Wright's creepy ass stalking. But Atlas, you made up a fake backstory as a horse trader for your I. Goldstein account. That was a lie, intended to obscure the facts from people about the risks in investing with you. You probably would have many victims of this dishonest practice if you weren't always called out every time you make a thread.

You're just a kid with some dumb ideas about business and naivetee about economics. You're not a monster and you aren't victimizing anybody.

holy shit lol

Can you guys hurry up and post the next round of this internet bitch fight?  I have to go to work in a couple of hours and I need my morning drama fix before I leave.

Bump. Only an hour and forty-five minutes before repentance has to go to work. Help a fellow BT'er.

Let me try...

WHO CAN'T YOU JUST LEAVE ATLAS ALONE?!!

If you keep bullying him, I'M JUST GONNA KILL MYSELF!!! And then I'll kill all you too! That'll show you!

There's nothing like a typo in 18 point red.

LOL! Your welcome  ;D

Note to self: Remember to don't hump my new coffee table and type at the same time.  ;)

Nah, i'm just typing all of this on my android tablet, and sometimes the autocorrect gets wonky.

I like how Atlas still doesn't understand why people had problems with him hijacking other people's computers to mine bitcoins with his website (an idea he's now recycled and is offering it to other people as a "revolutionary idea.")

He wants victims? There were plenty there. Just because the amount stolen from others was miniscule doesn't mean it wasn't a crime. Guess the word "principle" doesn't exist in whatever idiot dictionary he uses to make himself look smart.

You're making the mistake of assuming that Atlas doesn't understand the arguments people have been making about forced mining.  He understands them - he just doesn't agree with them.

I'm leaving for work in 10 minutes.  I fully expect to come home to the mother of all internet bitch fights and I'm going to be really pissed of if you guys drop the ball on this.

Goddamn this thread is so full of hilarious I just about got a nosebleed reading it.

I say we dig some shit up on repentance to make him a happy camper when he gets home from work. I'm sure there's a nugget or two in his 462 posts, coupled with a little Google Gold Mining, to make get what he wishes for.  ;)

Boy, this is weird. It looks like our friend, repentance, is a religious fanatic: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/search.php?s=937dc325a755162457d6f38c25a8ccec&do=finduser&u=14697

I'd rather bet the concept of "repentance" is one common to all religions, and him picking a dictionary word makes it 99.99999% likely (estimate) he isn't the only one on the net.

I truly knew that, but wanted to have some fun at repentance's expense, nonetheless. It was the best thing I could did up in short notice. I had a 50/50 chance of it being the same guy.

This repentance guy is a slick one. Picking a dictionary word to cover his online presence is genius. I'm even willing to bet he enjoys a relatively normal life.

lol

He at least knows how to do Bitcoin-style statistics

You mean you fall somewhere near the mean?


I just got the joke, JeffK.

Is Atlas really Mathew? I imagine him sitting there fighting with himself under 2 different personas.... or is it just me?

Haven't seen a good nerd fight in a long time.

Atlas, you're a thief, you basically admitted it in the SA thread, but handwaved it away by dismissing the low value of your theft.  It isn't the value of what you stole that matters, its the violation of trust that makes a thief untrustworthy.  People cannot give you money in good faith, because you have shown that it is in your moral center to take what does not belong to you. Besides, you didn't set out to steal "only a little", you set out to take as much as you could, but got called on it before that amounted to anything serious. The fact remains, you took that which does not belong to you. It's the same as picking their pocket and justifying it because they only had a penny. That you either can't admit what you did was wrong, or that you honestly don't believe it was wrong, only serves to show exactly why you can't be trusted.  

You're also a liar.  You claim to have never stolen, but you did steal with that javascript miner.  You claim to have never lied, but you lied about your scores in that robot competition hoping to get some donations.  I don't buy your story that you didn't see the scores at the competition for a second, and even if that is true, it still means you just made up those numbers on the spot.  This is behavior you're going to need to stamp out when you enter the real world.  You don't have value because you declare you do, when you leave the protection and safety of your parents, people are going to expect results when they hire you.

Also, you really need to check your terms in a dictionary.  Nothing makes someone look dumber than attempting to use big words to sound intelligent, and then using them incorrectly.  And you do, often.

You're still just a kid, I wasn't particularly enlightened at your age either, and you'll most likely grow out of it as you enter a world where you really do need to take care of yourself, and can't rely on parents for food, shelter, clothing, and entertainment.

Matthew.  Stop this trainwreck.  You're a grown-ass man in an internet slapfight with a teenager.  That's just sad.  Don't call his mom, stop following his every move, no one here trusts him or takes him seriously anyway, it really isn't a big deal. Let it go, you'll be a lot happier.  This is good life advice in general. Bitcoin won't fall solely because of Atlas' inability to follow through on a single project.  That's your free market weeding him out, alright?

Don't forget his claims of being a 70-year-old horse trader with a keen interest in Bitcoin. Which I still can't think about without laughing for several minutes.

Atlas has an account on the Cheating Network called Amiath.

He recently posted this advice (http://cheatingnetwork.net/forums/chit-chat/96363-dick-problem-paypal.html#post861515) regarding another poster being found out for using a fake ssn for their paypal account:


Concerning another poster being sent a TV instead of a pair of headphones (http://cheatingnetwork.net/forums/chit-chat/96245-buy-item-user-sent-different-item-accident.html#post860992):


He sure comes across like an unscrupulous scammer.

WTF!!! http://cheatingnetwork.net/forums/chit-chat/96205-post-your-gender-now-boy-girl.html#post860742

http://cheatingnetwork.net/forums/avatars/amiath.gif?dateline=1318970508

n/m

See poetry thread.

Just call his goddamn parents or not. You're bordering on blackmail now.

Can we get you banned for racism now?

Most states in the U.S. have a statute (http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXV/Chapter93/Section43) that protects the receiver of unsolicited products from returning them. I am not sure if a mistaken order counts as "unsolicited," but I bet you could make a pretty damn good case that it is. Don't send the wrong merchandise.

No, racism isn't against forum policy. Of course, the caveat about that is that significant trolling is bannable, and racism is likely to have a large overlap with trolling.