Bitcoin Forum

You are disgusting. I really want to leave it at that but you will probably remove the reply for being off topic if I don't elaborate. You have little to no self awareness. Your exploitation of these attacks to cast these people as terrorists for supporting the laws and foundation of our nation is truly sickening.

These two have plenty of ideas to be critical over, this is just your personal peev. Also you are a fucking Canadian, how about you stop injecting yourself into all of our internal policies. Oh that's right you live in Canada and it is a frozen wasteland so you have to focus on the US all the time.


EDIT: This post was taken out of context from a thread in Politics & Society and posted here because Flying Hellfish is attempting to prevent a critical, on topic reply to his post by cropping it off and posting it here. I did not make this op as a new thread, but as a reply to the quotes above.

I presume, it is fine when the left does the very same thing (not that both sides haven't done it)? NPC. ::)

---

I'll walk myself out.
https://i.imgur.com/gKEdWrz.png

I think Flying Hellfish went a little too far with that comment about B1tUnl0ck3r and BADecker being the next terrorist or bomber or whatever.  Having said that, I don't follow any of the threads which are causing this drama.

I would hope that Flying Hellfish's personal beliefs don't interfere with his fair treatment of members here as far as moderation goes, i.e., that he's not deleting posts based on someone defending the right to bear arms (which is primarily a widely-held value in the United States if I'm not mistaken and not as much so in Canada).  The United States has a long history of citizens needing to be armed.  There were long periods of time when huge parts of the country was basically lawless and people had to stand up for what was theirs.  This has carried over into the present day, where many folks believe they need to have the ability to bear arms to defend themselves and their property. 

Regardless of whether B1tUnl0ck3r and BADecker are exhibiting signs of being mentally unstable, their voices should be heard--as long as they follow the rules of the forum.  Flying Hellfish has done an excellent job as a mod as far as I can tell, and I trust he'll keep his own biases out of his moderation.

We produce just as much food as the US does in our "frozen wasteland" - is it because we are harder workers or just more efficient?

Ignorance is bliss.  :)

Was there anything deleted in the thread? I can't tell but looking at it all I see is FH providing their opinion on the topic. Just because they are a MOD and their opinion isn't inline with 2nd amendment protectionist views, they should still be able to express that freely.

We wouldn't want to stiffle the right of people to express themselves freely here, within the guidelines/rules of the forum. This includes you and being able to express your feelings/thought on the subject.


It's refreshing to see the term terrorist applied here to the actual perpetrators of these crimes whether intentional or not.


I can admit to being more enthralled with US politics from an early age, because of the spectacle. The constant nearly never ending campaigning and the at times outright hilarity of the people and their actions that deem themselves adequate to rule govern. Canadian politics are generally boring by comparison, at least until a few years ago when we had a good year of real winners popping up all over the place.

To the point though this is a global forum and anyone should feel free to communicate their ideas or thoughts on any subject. However feel free to petition theymos for a U.S.A (insert repetitive chant) local board.

Believe me if I was moderating based on my opinion the whole board would look waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay different.  

I have deleted posts on both sides of all the arguments and I have left reported posts on both sides of the argument.

B1t (or w/e) opened 16 topics in a row and they were all reported, I removed 1 or 2 and moved I think 3.  I left all the other retarded shit he posted and in fact I posted that he is perfectly allowed to post most of his mumbo jubmo nonsense just in case someone wanted to actually read it.

Techshare is far more interested in trying to get me to stop posting my information because I live in a different country than him and for some reason my opinion is not valid.  I mean its not racism but he clearly doesn't like anyone saying anything that doesn't parrot his limited view of reality...


Nope fuck that, Techshare doesn't believe a person in a frozen wasteland is entitled to an opinion on his precious conspiracy theories.  Canadians are not as good as Americans because we are nothing with out them...

I don't give a fuck if I'm a mod or not I am allowed my opinion and if he doesn't like it he can fuck right off anytime he wants.  I will continue to post my opinion until it becomes against the rules for a lowly Canadian to post about American politics...  

But I can tell you this good luck censoring me Techshare, you could just put me on ignore.

Read you loud and clear on that one.  He wrote the following neutral feedback on my trust page:

"Just because you can't argue your points without personally attacking me is not my fault. You tell yourself whatever you like and block my messages. It doesn't change the fact that you are just a child throwing a fit because I hurt your frail little feelings by pointing out the flaws in your arguments. Of course if you simply just debated the subject none of this would be an issue now would it?

P.S. if I was threatening you, you would know it."

And if you read the reference thread, you can clearly see he can't tolerate opinions contrary to his own and takes it to the point of not agreeing to disagree (as he wrote in one post) but continuing the argument via PMs and then in trust feedback once his PMs were blocked.

Any argument/disagreement with TECHSHARE is not going to be a normal debate, because he's a hothead to put it mildly.  Keep up the fine work, Flying Hellfish.

Thanks buddy.

TECHSAHRE has sand in his vagina and I guess maybe he's not used to someone standing up to him, most bullies aren't used to that.  He has a problem with people that aren't like him. I also have a real problem with anyone telling me to stop posting my opinion because of the country I live in.

When facts start to make you look like a retard it's best to try and get your opponent to shut up.  I hope it's noted I have never once suggested him or ANYONE shouldn't post their opinion, while TECHSHARE would like people not post their opinion if they're not from his country.

I'm not a politically correct Libtard, I have argued time and again that even the mentally retarded trolls are allowed their opinions (as per theymos' rules).  So when some stinky cunt comes around telling me to shut up because I'm Canadian, ya I get a little pissed off and am not afraid to tell the person looking to censor me they are an ignorant cunt.

1) If those two are entitled to their opinion, then Flying Hellfish too is entitled to his opinion and is authorized to vocalize comments thereof.
2) American politics are not restricted solely to those that reside in the United States (or are citizens outside of the country). There is no reason why Canadians should not discuss American politics as well as their own.

I for one, support the second amendment. (And to create some change in Canadian law to authorize tools for self-defence)

In case anyone actually cares I received a PM today saying that because I am "protecting" the trolls this user (not the OP) was done with the forum and that the forum lost a good user because I am protecting users who are morons...  This user (not the OP) was upset at me because I had removed his brilliant posts for being off topic.  I sent him a PM asking to make a different thread for the post or post it somewhere more appropriate but of course I was attacking him and he is taking is awesome posts and going home to mommy's basement.

I've proven that I don't care what your opinion is I DO NOT REMOVE posts because of the actual opinion in it.  If ANY post is breaking forum rules I will deal with it as appropriate regardless of the opinion in the post.

People shouldn't conflate the fact that I am willing to call retards retarded with the fact that I am somehow because of that censoring certain users posts.  In fact I love some of the retarded conspiracy theories they make me laugh and I enjoy calling stupid people retards!

I wont continue the off topic gun control discussion but anyone wishing to discuss it there are a number of threads in P&S discussing gun control and political/social violence, come join the chat.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4099972.msg47546846#msg47546846

Moloch sent you a PM to tell you that he's leaving the forum in case you missed his post where he was saying that he's leaving. ;D

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/le-miiverse-resource/images/b/b0/Toy-story-meme-drama-everywhere.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150324022530

He'll be back after some quiet time.

You may benefit from discussing this with a therapist.

The selectively out of context moving of my posts to make it look like I made this out of nowhere is cute. Also since you didn't just delete it you get to pretend this isn't censorship too! Convenient how that works out for you being a moderator.

You made the posts retard not me, if you don't make the posts they won't be on the site.  It's funny had I removed it you would have said I was censoring you, since I didn't delete them I am still censoring you.

You are the definition of a fucking retarded hypocritical piece of shit.


Perhaps if people were more willing to tell stupid people they're stupid we might have less stupid people...  Too many people think they're special snowflakes when in reality they are stupid retards.

Of course the OP calling me a rapist and calling me disgusting or telling me I am not worthy of my opinion for being Canadian is just fine right??????????

Considering that the post was very much on topic, I don't see how it would be hypocritical at all to accuse you of censorship for doing any of those things.

A straight up attack on me personally is not on topic stupid

The bolded part is DEFINITELY on topic. Just because you don't like that I am critical of you first of all doesn't make it an attack. Second that does not automatically make it off topic. It however is very much on topic, and I think you know it.

Calling me disgusting and a rapist is a personal attack, telling me you don't want me posting because of the country I live in is an attack.

I know reality isn't a place you are comfortable in even if the rest of us are.

Obviously not.  If he admitted to enjoying these types of interactions I would also suggest that he could benefit from speaking with a trained professional.  No need to make assumptions about my intent.  I'll spell it out clearly.  I'd like it if you both did whatever was necessary to be able to coexist without insulting each other.  If that is therapy, or spending some time with special needs individuals, or rape victims, I'd be a huge supporter of any effort to avoid these types of interactions in the future.

Oh ok so since I enjoy calling stupid people retards and he just calls me a rapist, disgusting, and my opinion is not welcome because I live in a frozen wasteland that is useless without his country without enjoying it you felt the need to suggest I need therapy and left him out of it for some reason?

See since you're reasonable and not attacking me I do what I do with 99% of the users which is discuss things with you.

If you were to all of a sudden suggest I am disgusting or a rapist or wanted to censor me for the country I live in then I would probably call you a retard as well.  Since I assume you are more than OK with me posting my opinion on an opinion board regardless of the fact I reside in a lowly frozen wasteland and need therapy then I am just fine with you and almost all the other users here.

I happily treat people the way they treat me, I approach all users politely and respectfully, especially since I have become a mod but if someone is going to attack me or wants to censor me I will fight back thank you very much, I'm surprised that me defending myself makes me a person that requires therapy, guess the 2nd amendment only counts to guns for defense and not words.

I'm not saying what he did was right.  You seem to think I'm defending him.  I said, "If he admitted to enjoying these types of interactions I would also suggest that he could benefit from speaking with a trained professional" and further alluded that his post suggested he could benefit from spending time with rape victims.  One can point out that enjoyment of doling out derogatory statements is not a healthy attitude and suggest a positive way forward that I think could enlighten without attacking.  Anything you took from my statement other than that is an assumption by you.



You can fight back all you want.  If that makes you happy, go for it.  I don't think that's the way to make this forum a better place, which is all I really care about when it comes to Staff members, but if that's the attitude that landed you this position then someone must see some benefit in it.  I have no desire to continue arguing with you but will state that:
1) I never said you required therapy.  I suggested a way you may benefit as an individual, but perhaps I made an incorrect assumption that enjoyment from the belittling of others was a personality trait you'd find a greater happiness in changing.  I apologize.  
2) I won't treat you how you treat others and judge you critically for your statement about the 2nd amendment and it's application to words.

It seems you are purposely conflagrating two separate topics to cover up the clear case of censorship here.

Dude please I have not treated you with anything but complete courtesy, so feel free to judge me any way you want.  

I most certainly tried to explain politely many times about the rules TECHSHARE was violating and why I removed certain posts and wouldn't remove other posts.

Since TECHSHARE decided he didn't agree with that and didn't like my opinions he went full retard and called me disgusting, said my opinion wasn't valid because I live in a shit hole country that only exists because of his country.  When I continued to be critical of his holy saviour trump he decided to go one step further and call me a rapist (joke or not it wasn't funny or on topic).

So I've had enough at this point, and you know what if he wants to keep going full retard I will keep calling him a retard, but I won't censor him unlike what he said should be done to me.

I may be a mod but I am also a fucking user so when it gets to a certain point then I am done holding back.  Anyone that doesn't like that is free to fuck off, ignore me, PM theymos, give me red trust or whatever else the fuck they want!

I didn't delete his posts I moved them but yet I am still censoring him somehow even though the information is fully present and accesible by ANYONE.  My interpretation of the rules says that personal attacks belong in reputation not the trash can as someone might think I was censoring him.  Not to mention it was designed to inflame and off topic posts were surely to follow.  In that vain I moved it to the spot where discussion could continue.  Some how in TECHSHARES pea brain this is actually further censorship instead of me applying the rules and allowing him his opinion of me...

So ya he's gone full retard so I have no problems calling him a retard and I don't think that is a character flaw because there is way to much PC bullshit in this day and age.  It's a shame when normal people are scared to call morons, morons.

You literally removed my statement from the conversation. Moving an on topic response to a political post to an out of context section is still a sad attempt at censorship, but in a way you can claim you aren't actually censoring. Context matters.

I know reading comprehension is hard but in case you missed it  

Not to mention it was designed to inflame and off topic posts were surely to follow.  In that vain I moved it to the spot where discussion could continue.  Some how in TECHSHARES pea brain this is actually further censorship instead of me applying the rules and allowing him his opinion of me...

Why again do you want to censor me because of the country I live in, I notice you completely ignore this point time and time again????????  I'm not saying your a racist but it's a good thing I come from a predominantly white country or someone might think your racist!  


See you really are retarded, since you like the word context perhaps we could read post #2 in the thread in question
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5062639.0


Ok so if I delete your post I am censoring you, if I move the post while still providing context I am still censoring you.  See when you say retarded shit like that you shouldn't be surprised to be called a retard!

Removing my ability to continue the conversation when my reply was on topic (just offensive to your ideals), is in fact censorship regardless if you moved it to the garbage can or reputation, because that is not where I posted. It was clearly an abuse of your authority to silence an opinion that you didn't agree with. This post is here as a direct result of your actions, I didn't make the OP here, you did. You have fun hurling insults and playing dirty little mod games. I am sure that will work out just fine for you.

Why don't you answer the question about wanting to censor me because the Country I live in?

Whats ironic is you called me disgusting and a rapist and my opinion didn't count because of my country yet cry like a little baby twat waffle when I fire back at you, go wash you pussy.

You should PM theymos to have me removed as a mod or start a meta thread to get me removed as a mod.  I am a Nazi censoring communist that all the trolls hate!

So then you cry like a little bitch about context and I show you I provided context you then move the goal posts again. So context doesn't matter, see you say something that doesn't mean anything to you because if it did you would recognize I provided context.

I don't give a fuck where you posted something that doesn't mean it belongs there full stop.

Why don't you answer the question about wanting to censor me because the Country I live in?

You are the one that made reports to have differing opinions than yours removed, how many bad reports do you have lately?

Why don't you answer the question about wanting to censor me because the Country I live in?

isn't it funny you're the victim of censorship by me but you're the one who wants to shut me up because in your words I live in a frozen wasteland and have no business discussing US politics.

Why don't you answer the question about wanting to censor me because the Country I live in?



And here is the polar opposite of TECSHARE who also hates me.  I guess if trolls on both sides hate me I must be doing something right.


All the trolls hate old Flying Hellfish hes such a fascist communist!

In fairness to users BADecker, Spendulus, CoinCube they have never openly posted about me censoring them (AFAIK), they have all appeared to be relatively reasonable when discussing mod issues unlike TECHSHARE or Moloch.

It seems trolls don't understand that posts get removed or moved by mods and they think their posts are so amazing they belong where ever they put them no matter what the content is!

Because the very concept of you crying about me censoring you is insane...

Speaking critically of you is not censorship, though I can see how you would latch on to something else to cast yourself as some kind of victim here. Me censoring a moderator is not possible so, your rambling about it is nonsense. I just wanted to have a conversation and be free to be critical of your opinions without having my comments moved out of context on some flimsy pretext. I don't owe you explanations for anything with your desperate attempt to change the subject from your censorship.



YOU STARTED THIS THREAD NOT ME.


If you don't like the circus don't invite it to town.

I never said speaking critically about me is censorship, I am well aware you don't have the ability to censor me and I never claimed you did but I know you are too stupid to actually understand words.

If you actually read the words I typed I said you wanted me censored because of the country I live in.  This shows a record of your complete bias. You're an unreasonable asshole who thinks he and his country are better than other people.

If you don't like the words don't write them next time.


You're right you don't owe me an explanation but people should see that your essentially a racist piece of shit.

This is all just you desperately justifying your behavior with your delusions. None of this changes the fact of what you did.

This is just you not understanding words.  None of this changes the fact that you admitted to essentially being racist!

Last I checked Canada isn't a race even if you accusations were true lol.

I am fully aware Canada is not a race which is why I used the word essentially.  I know reading comprehension isn't you're strong suit but try to keep up retard, you're making yourself look really really bad LOL.

Of course insulting an entire country and telling me to stop talking about American politics BECAUSE of the country I live in isn't discriminatory?

Exactly what does any of this have to do with your inability to have a critical conversation about your opinions without moving replies you can't handle to different subforums?

It goes to show that you have a significant bias, an inability to think critically and a discriminatory attitude.  

These kinds of attributes go to showing folks that you're claims against me are based not in fact or reality but in bias hatred.

I mean I still haven't seen you deny the discriminatory comments you made, well they are there for everyone to read so I guess I can understand why you ignore it.

Anything else you need me to school you on?  Keep going I can spare some more time for ya!

Your delusional conclusions based on nothing are not as reflective on me as they are on you. Of course it is not like comparing people to terrorists because you disagree with them is anything in comparison to your woes.  None of this justifies your censorship of this very on topic reply to your post accusing people of being one step away from begin terrorists, but hey what is important is I am racist against Canadians... or something.

Ok first of all I said that those 2 users were one "event" away from being terrorists and if you actually read as much of their moronic posts as I have had to you will understand they are not right in the head.  B1t for example spams incoherently about pedo networks and jews etc etc, sounds a little like the social networks of the synagogue shooter...

Now while I have commented on those two special retards I have also argued a number of times they have the same "rights" to post here because that's the rules theymos has put in place.  I have also refused to delete a lot of their posts that have been reported.

You on the other hand have argued I should not be able to have an opinion because of the country I live in.

You have argued I am censoring you even though I didn't delete the so called censored posts.

The threads and my posts you keep claiming are off topic and censorship are still here, I wonder why none of the globals are deleting all this censorship and off topic.

I wonder why theymos hasn't removed me as a moderator yet, I mean he wouldn't stand for a second for a moderator censoring any user, he protects all you trolls just the same!

You can't understand anything except your version of reality.  I tried to discuss this with you politely privately but since I wouldn't censor posts you didn't like you went off the deep end.

I see lots of opinions you don't agree with. Tell me, which one of them justifies your behavior?

You see lots of opinions I don't agree with because I don't censor (or moderate as us norms call it) based on my opinions.

Thanks for helping to prove my point again and your inability to grasp simple logic.

I defend the "trolls" "right" to post here the same as the other users here so I guess the rules justify my behavior.  I'm allowed to called them what I think they are, it is an opinion board after all....

You on the other hand have only your discriminatory posts and desire to have me censored to justify your behavior.

School is in session sunshine, keep em coming!

I see claims. I see lots of self reassurance. I don't see any explanation of your behavior. The post was clearly an on topic reply you simply had no decent response to because you KNOW it went to far. Rather than admit that mistake, you instead opted to move my post somewhere else on the forum in a sad attempt to censor while pretending you are not censoring, and also immediately put me on the defensive by having this weird out of place post in reputation that looks like I posted the OP. Considering all I did was participate in a political discussion, I would say you have more explaining to do here than I do.

So if you can take a break from telling yourself how much winning you are doing, can you explain to me why this direct response was not on topic? Because you feel it was insulting? If that is the case pretty much all of your posts directed at me would be off topic as they include direct insults. Not that I really care if you insult me, it is just pretty glaring how there are a set of standards for yourself, and then for people you disagree with.

Like my Republican brothers I never get tired of winning!


Because the entire post was about me and not the topic at hand...


I don't give a fuck if you insult me, knock yourself out.  I won't censor you opinion of me which is why I moved it here instead of deleting it...  If you notice this entire thread would be off topic in the original thread and the entire thread would have divulged into an off topic personal argument between you and I.  Instead of allowing the topic to be polluted with off topic nonsense I moved it to the location where this type of discussion is appropriate.

Actually the entire post was about your comment. You can play word games all you like to pretend you didn't do what you did, but it is clear what the direct result is. Shutting down political criticism you could not handle by moving it to an unrelated section, making it appear like I posted a reputation post.

You removed it because I exposed your hypocrisy, using terrorist attacks to try to demonize the people you disagree with as terrorists while talking out of the other side of your mouth about scaling back rhetoric, as if Conservatives are to blame for these attacks. You realized I caught you in a situation you could not argue against, so you shuffled it off to the dustbin of the forum hoping you could just intimidate me into not calling you on it. Well you did that for me. Now rather than simply facing the political criticism, you have doubled down and abused your moderation position rather than attempting to argue your point.

Ok turbo you run around with your conspiracy theories, I'll hang in reality and wait to be banned!

FH out!

There you go again, taking the easy way out. Why defend your argument when you can just cast me as group XYZ and dismiss your abuse as a result. No worries though, the whole forum saw how calm and controlled you were thru this whole episode, I am sure there is no doubt of your impartiality and ability to control your emotions.

So we have a choice between

- P&S being overrun by assholes like TECSHARE/Quicksy/bluefirewhatshername; or
- having it moderated by an opinionated commie pothead who lives in an ice hut...

Yeah that's a tough one LOL. Keep in mind that not so long ago no one else really cared much about cleaning up P&S and that's how FHF got the job.

Censorship my ass. Create a thread in Off Topic like notbatman and live there.

Tell me, why I am I responsible for the behavior of those other individuals? Am I an "asshole" because I have opinions you disagree with? Is that not the point of the section to have discussions with people you don't agree with?

Also that is a false choice fallacy. There are plenty of other options besides your two extremist examples. Frankly I didn't feel the need to make this a public discussion. Flying Hellfish did however, and here we are. In the OP he created by removing my critical, on topic political reply to him, from its original thread to "Reputation", using authority exclusive to moderators.

Tell me where I said that you're "responsible for the behavior of those other individuals"?

You're an asshole because you're an asshole. You can't hold a discussion for more than a couple of posts without descending into pointless trollery and personal attacks. Which belongs in Reputation, Off Topic, or trashcan.

Well badecker literally believes police in the US is worse than ISIS so I wouldn't be surprised at all if he did something insane.

PD: he is insane.

Can you tell me what your baseless opinions about my opinions have to do with this specific incident right here? You know, on topic?

I already did. There is no censorship. There's just your butthurt for being unable to shitpost P&S.

It's a motherfucking Igloo not an ice hut... brb Polar Bears need feeding!  8)  ;D

Except you didn't even address the actual situation. You attempted to make me look guilty by association (with people I don't really even associate with or necessarily like), and unilaterally judged my posts as "trolling" and "personal attacks". If my posts are all such off topic trolling, why are they still up?

I wasn't complaining. I didn't find it necessary to post about Flying Hellfish's Reputation, but he decided to put this here as if I posted the op. Literally this thread is a direct result of his actions.

Also I find it amusing you accuse me of not being able to control myself for more than a few posts without personal attacks while both of you pretty much include one in almost every post. I think there may be just a little bit of projection going on. You can just label things you disagree with as "trolling", or "personal attacks", but most of us can read simple English and can see that I was directly replying to his political rhetoric with a valid argument of my own.

No, "fucking Canadian" is not a "valid argument". I don't call you a "fucking Russian troll" or whatever the fuck you are when I don't like your opinion. In fact the first few times you attacked me I tried to reason with you but you're clearly unable to see a difference between a person and an argument (everyone who doesn't agree with you is a "lefty") so your fake concern about exploiting terrorist attacks is not fooling anyone. I don't see you retracting your repugnant harebrained conspiracy theories about those attacks.

Create your own threads and set your own local rules if you're so inclined.

Lets take a look:

1. The topic of the thread is "We stand with the second Amendment no matter what...", which I directly address in reference (1).

2. I directly reply to Flying Hellfish's commentary comparing other forum posters to terrorists, exploiting the recent bomb threats and attacks in reference (2).

3. I again reference the fact that he compared these posters to terrorists, pointing out that they say plenty of things far more worthy of criticism, and this is simply a pet issue of his.

4. The entire post is a direct criticism of his words and the way in which he conducts himself during "debate".


It is convenient to simply just label this "off topic" or "trolling" when you don't agree with the conclusions. The problem is eventually its going to be you too unable to speak freely, that is how censorship works. Frankly though I don't believe either of you actually believe what you are saying and are just hoping you can spin this and wrap it up before too many people notice and think too hard about it.

Well at least you finally admit the entire post is a direct criticism of me, since the debate wasn't about me I appreciate you pointing out that the entire post was off topic as I asserted from the beginning.  You forgot to add above and beyond the criticism was the discriminatory comments included in your post.

Can you tell me what section an entire post criticizing someone should belong?  Would that be reputation or Politics and Society?  I'll give you a hint look at where the thread is still located!

What conclusions? That Canadians should not participate in political debates? Mighty hypocritical given your whining about speaking freely. Speak on the right board and you'll be fine, as evidenced by all the garbage you've been posting in this thread - you don't seem to have been banned yet.

I know you like to stretch the interpretations of words as much as possible, but really, this is getting sad the lengths you are having to go to now to justify your actions. We both know my words were a direct response to your comments and your emotions got the better of you and you made a poor judgement.

Apparently I am not the only one you have done this to...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5067125.0