Bitcoin Forum

Do you think paying bounty hunters in bitcoin or ethereum a good idea so that there is uniform payment among the participants? What is your thought about this? Maybe this is the first step to turn back the trust they lost because of mostly valueless coins they offered. What is your thought here guys?

Yes, it was always a good idea, certain ICO projects have been paying Bitcoin for a long time, and these projects recruit bounty hunters in a matter of hours, as they always have a limit on the number of participants in the ICO generosity campaign. Such projects pay a certain amount of bitcoins monthly or even weekly. That is, there are certain guarantees that you will not work for many months and get nothing as a result. If any of the bounty hunters wants to get the tokens of this ICO project, in any case they can also buy these tokens on a common basis as ordinary investors with big bonuses.

Yes i do. that's a good idea to prevent the dump of the token itself. Bitcoin and ether gives a lot of volume and that will not give any impact to the price of token. did you remember most of tokens being dumped caused by that doesn't have a lot of volume. It should be a good method to pay the hunters.

This, of course, would be great, maybe more money would not work, but the portfolio will not grow, there are a few coins and excellent, and then constantly monitor different wallets gives some discomfort, in my memory there were several companies, but unfortunately it is more convenient for companies to pay in their own tokens.

This is a good idea, but most of the Ico project will not like to do that because is more expense for them. Paying bounty hunter with the ICO token or coin will be more easy for them. Paying with Bitcoin or Ethereum will reduced dumping of the ICO. It will be good for them to pay with Ethereum or Bitcoin.

This of course would be beneficial to the bounty participants but would undermine an important reason for bounty distribution.
The bounty provider are not just giving away coin for advertising the project, they are also building a community and participation around their token.

that will never happen because an ICO owner doesn't want to spend money. or at least spend the least amount of money. so they pay with the thing they are creating out of thin air aka the tokens they create. and that costs them nothing.
paying with bitcoin requires them to pay money and buy bitcoin and pay with a valuable coin.

It's a good idea, previously all bounty program were using bitcoin as payment, but since the price of bitcoin too volatile and the circulation of the ICO coins not too good, some of them started to paid uaing their own coin, and once everyone seems okay with the ICO coin payment then nobody want go used btc or eth anymore, it's more profitable for us to be paid using bitcoin

There are many advantages that bounty hunters get if they receive btc or eth directly in every bounty. The bounty hunter will not have difficulty selling the reward and will probably minimize the dump or price decline that will occur.

I think that this will lead to stable payments, in January I would not agree with you, but now I would be happy to see stable payments.

This thought is very good. The bounty hunters will not affect the price of token when sell, they could sell as they wish. but unfortunately I do not think that the people who make ICO are BTC or ETH in their hands. I do not even think they collect the money they collect. for this reason it is easier to give their tokens to instead of BTC.

They should really be paying for bitcoin but I doubt it will happen nowadays.

I don't join bounties but its rare to see them pay with Ethereum and bitcoin. There might be few bounties that will pay in ethereum but I doubt it with bitcoin today. They are just going to pay with their tokens and that is zero investment and capital on their side, as I've said its rare today.

Nowadays began to appear bounty campaigns that offer rewards in ethereum. I am glad that this is so, because ethereum is more stable than any new ico token.

As a rule, these are good projects, and there is more likelihood that they will finish the job started!

Yes this is good. I have met such projects that ETH paid me, but haven’t yet seen who would pay at BTC. It would be cool if all the projects did that.

That will surely be a perfect idea for bounty hunters, the fear of not getting paid at the end if ICO will surely disappear,but the question is how many ICO are ready to do that.

There are some ICOs which still pay bounty hunters in bitcoin or ethereum. But it is really rare and their rules are extremely strict.

I do not think all ICO owners will do it. There are few ICOs starting with their existing small funds, even they have nothing excluding the ideas. This is difficult to impose on all ICOs.

The idea is good, but they pay very little in bitcoins and Ethereum. Although if each Scam will pay Ethereum and bitcoin, for all the projects in which I participate will be a decent amount. This is better than tokens, which may not enter the exchange at all.

Unfortunately, this will not be gray. If you need a reason, it is simple. And how to continue to distribute their coins? The coin of the project may have nothing to cost, but the project will have to be paid for in the BTC.

We will not see that. So you can not dream (*

As Bitcoin plays the main role in crypto market, that would be very strong model for rewarding supporters ..

Of course this is a good idea. If project admin decide to pay via Ethereum or Bitcoin among bounty hunters it will be best decision. Although rewards low if pay via BTC or ETH, but it will be good for every hunter. Hunters works so quite and spreading in the world.            

This would be great, if a project are able the bounty hunter with Bitcoin or Eth, this only means that the project have a start up fund.  This somehow differentiate them with other ICO that are made with zero fund in hand.  Aside from that it has been shown that ICO that offers Bitcoin or ETH as payment have more chance of success since they have the fund to pay for their marketing and advertisement.

It would be best for bounty hunters. It should be as protection against dump of new coins.

I agree with your idea, I have followed one of the bounties whose pay is not by using their Altcoin, but by using ETH, of course it will not make us in vain in working, a lot of tokens that I have received but the price is not in accordance with the price ICO, but there are also tokens that are not listed on the stock until now, even token sales have been completed for over 1 year.

It is a good idea, it has been suggest severally here on the forum but greedy project CEO's don't want that, they want to have all the btc to themselves in detriment to the price and value of their own token, i hope soon they will come to their senses and adopt this method.

It's a pretty good idea guys, look at my signature and follow bounty, you can sell your farmed stacks weekly for ETH. I've already tried it and it works. I hope we will see much more projects like this in future.

I want to say it's a very good idea. But it is rare to see BTC or ETH as a reward payment. Many ICO projects are unable to raise more funds. They will not be willing to use BTC or ETH as a means of payment. They only have tokens. So there is no way to unify the means of payment.

Projects are more willing to pay out the hunters in their own coin as they do not want to spend their
collected funds for hunters. That way the hunters are much more interested in the success of the project,
but if they do not feel it perspective they will dump their tokens which can hurt the project.
So, it has pros and cons for the project and the for the hunters as well.
Hunters are more pleased of course, if they are rewarded in ETH or BTC. Some projects make it on the
way that they pay out  only a part in BTC or ETC depending on the success of the crowd sale . I like that
concept  as the hunters are still interested in the success of the project and getting rewards in BTC or ETH
and they do not have to wait while the coin is listed on exchanges and do not have to bother with selling
it on a good price (waiting for months) or with dumping it.

Good idea paying bitcoin or ethereum for the bounty hunters to return and show the sincerity of the project
But i isuggest 5050 payment scheme 50 percent bitcoin 50 percent coins from the bounty project
I think is idea is fair for the devs

if the bounty hunter not just think about money and money in their mind, i think they are not want selling them asset and choose for holding their coin.

This is a good idea for such a market as it is now, since there will be some confidence to earn a stable amount of money and not to worry whether the project will succeed in reaching its intended goals or not.

Yes i do, that would be great if the payment will be on either Bitcoin or Ether. There is some project that already paying bountier with Ethereum, also signature campaign that have payment with Bitcoin. It will also prevent to dumping the price of that project itself.

dreams-dreams ;D
I think that would be fair, we do our work and sometimes we get paper instead of money. I think that we (community) should consider to work only for ETH/BTC.

I saw several platforms that work in this way, they pay certain coins attached to this platform, in my opinion, you can make 2 options, pay in Bitcoin and in coins of the project in which we work

Maybe they have advatanges of that , because they can prevent decreasing value of the token because we know bounty hunters is one of the factor why token become very low the value once they listed to the market but because paying bitcoin we can prevent that.

they will not go for it, and if they do, the payments will be extremely scanty and you don’t even want to participate in this bounty

If you think the coin you are promoting throw your signature or your social media profiles has no value, then why do you participate in first place. It is like cheating your followers.
Besides if some one creates his own product why should he use some one else's product!! It is like admitting that his product is not good enough and that would be a bad start.

Yeah i agree because nowadays many of us bounty hunters our effort will just go to waste because many ICO tokens is useless, if it will happen many bounty hunters will benefit, hope that this will happen for sure income.

Several ICOs last year and this year did manage to pay their bounty hunters in Bitcoin but it's only for signature and social media campaigns. Not all ICOs wanted to pay upfront because the risk behind in launching a signature campaign right now is that you don't know how much traffic you're going to get. Some of them are effective while others are not.

For us, it's great because you know how much you'll get but for them it might not be that great. It's not worth the risk if they're going heavy with upfront payments. With ICOs having bounties it's a risk for both sides.  

It was a good idea. But it might be risky for the bitcoin itself. If every project pays the participants with only one currency such as bitcoin, the bounty hunters might dump the bitcoin or sell it immediately resulting to the decrease of its market value.

and also it could keep ico price stable,coins holder only investor and no bounty hunter hold , so they could not dump token.bitcoin as bounty reward give alot benefits to investors and bounty hunters.

one of the considerations is whether the project is really serious in marketing, but as long as the quality of the bounty hunters in this forum has still not changed, I think this is not effective, there are still very many bounty hunters who cheat, some of them use bots to get subscriber.

I strongly agree again if the regulations for bounty are tightened, and the quality of content from bounty hunters must be the best even to be ultra good

There is nothing preventing them from doing it and I have been involved in a number of ICO's where some or all of the bounty was paid in Bitcoin and Ethereum. It will certainly end false claims about coins declining after the ICO because of people selling their bounty tokens.

I think that kind of defeats part of the purpose of the bounty. They want to give their coin a wider distribution and they aren't doing that if they're paying you in BTC. If you want BTC then just dump your coins.

I think some project already done that kind of thing, rewarding the bounty participant in the altcoins that already available in the market.
It could also minimize the possibilities for many people to curse the bounty participant to be the cause of price dropping when the coin listed in the market for the first time.

It's a good thing but the mountainous terrain avalanches for ICO will require a very large capital to it. and of course, they want to make it as realistic as possible with pay from their creation in order to coin their budget is not great. Although there are some who pay with bitcoin nor the ethereum, however, is very slight and also sometimes with limited participants.

It would be so much convenient for every bounty hunter if all kind of bounty campaign giving a reward in Bitcoin or ethereum.
I would gladly join the campaign, that way our work could be fully appreciated with that kind of reward.

actually there are still some campaigns that pay bounty participants with ethereum or bitcoin. try to look more carefully. unfortunately, most don't accept accounts with red trust like you. it will be a barrier for you to follow the campaign.

That will be definitely something great for bounty hunters but it is clear to me that it is never going to happen, the great advantage for developers of using their own coins comes from the fact they are paying bounty hunters with coins that have no value yet and that it did not cost them anything to create, if they tried to pay with bitcoin then that means they will need a huge amount of money just for the bounty campaign.

This issue has been discussed many times, but I don't think it will happen, because for ICO sponsors, it is the purpose of launching ICO for money, so how can it still pay with Bitcoin or Ethereum? It’s good that they can pay you tokens on time, and in most cases their payments are deferred.

I don't think this thing will happen because of all ICO projects need money to develop their products, pay their tokens for bounty hunters is a way to promote their projects, help their tokens appear on the coinmarketcap after being launched.

Yea, that's will be solve many problems (especially for bounty hunters with a bag of unusefull tokens). But I think most of ICO's projects are very greedy and they won't to pay in real value crypto like BTC/ETH.

It is a good idea because most of bounty hunters would just sell their token after they receive it and for people to stop blaming bounty hunters for the price drop of the token.

Paying in Bitcoin or ethereum would be very good for bounty hunters, however this is unlikely to ever be massive. Some ICO projects pay for the services of bounty hunters in bitcoin, less often in ethereum, and such projects are very popular with bounty hunters. However, such a payment is generally contrary to the goals of ICO projects that seek to sell their new tokens.

yes it is best for all reason being that coins will not be dumped as soon as the coin get listed on exchanges other than this fake project will not come as now a days they pay only their coins to the bounty hunters whether the project is success ot not. also the hunters will be much happier to get eth and btc as reward.

You might like the idea of being paid in a coin with perceived value but this makes no sense to the ICO projects. Don't forget the coins they are giving to the bounty hunters didn't cost anything so why would they want to actually pay for the service you are giving them?

That will be an amazing step and will not only benefit hunters it will benefit the credibility of any running ICO. ICO's that is willing to invest real money from the beginning and from their own pocket is more likely to be a real thing, I am not saying that the ICO paying with their own tokens are scams, all I am saying is that paying real $ in bounty will add another layer of filtering that will help to reduce scam ICO, which will benefit all participants parties from hunters and investors too.

You answered it all, why do you think the project owners will want to pay bounty hunters in Bitcoin and ether since you think their token/coins are valueless? Of course they know it's valueless and will not give you really value so that hunters can profit but they will rather pay bounty hunters in the same valueless token/coins, though there are other more serious project that do pay in Bitcoin though to bounty hunters.

It is a good idea after these tokens that doesn't have any value which the bounty hunters are complaining of.

They don't need to wait for these tokens to get listed on exchange so they can sell it without any problem.

If bounty hunters paid in bitcoin it would be a mess for the bitcoin and the investor of the bitcoin and you can expect a lot of MASSIVE DUMP. Think twice, pay in tokens is absolutely a great way for it
.

I find some of the projects pay with bitcoin and this is very a lot of devotees. from regulation alone is enough tight where using at least merit to join. but participants are allowed also limited that much going the fastest competition. but for the payment of relatively small and I think it's better to get paid just because even other coins were bigger and the work is also not too heavy.

Obviously it's very good for bounty hunters, not much companies do that, only a few companies run signature campaigns and pay Bitcoin, but only high rank members can join, they don't have other campaigns, they run only signature campaign.

The main thing is that payments should be made once a week or once in two weeks, and not at the end of the campaign or one month after the end of the ICO, so there will be a guarantee that the earned Bitcoins will be received by bounty hunters, and not be lost along with the project team. Although I heard that in such projects there are usually lower payments than in those projects in which they pay in tokens. But I agree that this is a controversial statement because of the completely different liquidity of Bitcoin and the tokens of the new project.

For bounty hunters they will like it that paying bitcoins or ethereum, but I don't think the ICO projects will be success, mostly running campaigns that pays bitcoin are gambling sites, exchanges, the altcoins they just to promote it. 

it seems that it will not be possible because it will make the founders and those who have ICO projects suffer a lot of losses because the bitcoin used for the bounty allocation campaign will make the ico lose its funds, many ICOs prefer to make payments using their tokens .

I think that we need intermediary first. I mean, we need a person who will receive all award at the beginning. It has to be the famous person.
And he has to have great trust of course. Then after the end of a campaign he will distribute all award among bounty hunters.
And yes. Award have to be the stablest => USDT, BTC or something else.

For me it would be perfect to have a bitcoin or ethereum as a payment. It won't makes us getting headache to wait for the reward coins to be trade able.
So we can sell the reward without affecting the coin of the project.

That's good.. but im sure, there is maximum participant if they will pay with bitcoin, the task is not easy to do and rules is more tight..

as far as I know some major projects that focus on the signature campaign have implemented this, they make direct payments every week with bitcoin. but if we want to implement it as a whole for other small projects, it will be very difficult, besides not being profitable for the project owner, there will be a tendency for new accounts to abuse bounty campaigns. Strict regulations and rules should begin to exist and be applied massively against campaigner bounties.

Your point is correct and I think it is a good idea which all bounty hunter will have their salary after they promote the project. But, do you ever think what will happen to their token? Even it is a good idea to pay us in bitcoin and ethereum but I think it is also a good to pay us with their token.

Definitely paying Bounty Hunters in Bitcoin would be a good idea because Bitcoin is a good store value and all centralized exchanges accepts bitccoin so definitely bounty hunters can easily get their payment easy and does not have to wait for a long period of time to receive and enjoy their payments.

I believe that OP has a good idea as bounty hunters would really like if that will happen. Bounty tokens in eth and btc would mean an increase in participation of many bounty hunters which could boost their interest from joining bounties. I think that many of those bounty hunters who had stopped in participating bounties would be eager again to come back knowing that bounty tokens will be in btc form of currency.

That doesn’t sound like a good idea to me. If they should be paying bounty hunters in Bitcoin and Ethereum, then what’s the need of the promotion they are doing? For their project to be successful they need issue out their own coins. Take for example we have Square Bet (don’t know if that’s the name though)and they issue a coin called SB coin.

I would like to see them offer payment in Bitcoin, but what I’m trying to say is that doing so wouldn’t benefit the company. So they got issue out their own coin, if you think the coin would turn to have no value later, then exchange it quickly when you can.

i think the idea is really good and i would it also like when icos pay their bountie participants in bitcoin or ethereum. but something like this will unfortunately not come, because most icos can not afford something like that.

That happened, the ICO project pays bounty hunters using BTC but is not 100% using BTC. Usually there is a merger between their Bitcoin and Tokens. And there is also using a service using Ethereum. Actually there is added value if we get payments using BTC. of course we can sell it directly.

I prefer to have that kind of bounty program, just like a while ago where a project is giving ETH as the reward for the bounty participant.
So it would be better if there are more and more of that kind of project.

I agree, but I agree more that payments are made in exchange for dollars, because if I think ETH and Bitcoin are still volatile, the Dollar is more stable

That would be nice if more projects would pay their bounty hunters with bitcoin or ethereum.
In any case, i find that better than the most worthless token that we get.

There are not many such projects, now almost all make payments only in tokens, but this is also profitable!

It takes huge appropriations to be able to do so. only a very large project that could have this. but only some of the bounty that dared to make payments with bitcoin and that's it with the number of participants who have been limited and the rules that require a minimum merit requirement to join. the amount of work to be done is also being sued for more than the usual bounty in general.

yes you are right, it is always a good idea if they pay in btc or eth, but if bounty hunters promote the projects so usually projects wants they should give project tokens , as its help to increase the supply. because you promote the project token not btc or eth.

Payments for gift recipients using Bitcoin and Ethereum will be an extraordinary attraction. And regulations will be stricter and participants will be limited. I saw yesterday there was a project that was paid to use Ethereum and that was very profitable.

I agree with you some level still ICO is for fund-rising. You cannot expect people to have big money to pay for all their needs including bounty hunters. Just think about the reverse progress. Instead of enforcing a project to pay in bitcoin why not you choose a  right project so that you will never get disappointment for your participation in bounty programs.

In my opinion, this forum and how ICO projects are working like everything is as per the general world's norms and  and regulations. I mean if you are ready to risk blindly then you may get scammed at any time. At the same time, if you do all your research and then if you go for risking your efforts then you will get big rewards.

It would be a great alternative and it does not need to be BTC. It would be great if the teams would pay hunters with stable coins or with the most popular crypto currencies to avoid the coin dumps.

Well, for me as a bounty hunter I like this idea and I am thinking of this before. I actually am part of a bounty campaign that pays both Bitcoin and the projects token which will make them a more legit projects out there. We are paid half in Bitcoin/Ethereum and half in tokens and that was a great experience safe for bounty hunters part. I prefer projects that undergo that kind of payments in their bounty programs and I hate those projects that requires KYC because at the end of the day tokens could be worthless.

You are talking for the devs whereas OP is concerning about avoiding disappointment after participating in to bounty programs. I mean dumping after the distribution of reward is not a problem here but lots of bounty programs have scammed the participants and we need proper action for that so that we can save this forum as well as altcoin industry. I too guess we must enforce all the bounty programs to be in BTC or in ETH.

I am also not against KYC. But the scammers are introducing KYC at the time of distribution of bounty rewards. I do really hate that. Because they must clear their stand on KYC well in advanced like in the beginning of the program itself. Introducing KYC in the middle or at the end definitely is a way of scamming the bounty hunters. I just wonder why this forum is not taking proper action about this kind of scammers.

If ICO gives a prize in BTC altcoin will not appear, and this will certainly be very expensive and make the team more selective in accepting participants. Surely the ICO will mine continuously so it runs out of supply.

          For bounty hunters it would be a good idea to pay for their work in Bitcoin or Ethereum. But this idea seems harder to apply nowadays, because the reward provider of the project you are participating in, wants to create a community that owns their currency. This makes it difficult to believe that this can happen because it would not be to the benefit of the project and the project manager.

That would be the best thing that could happen. I would certainly participate in such a bounty campaign. Paying in bitcoin or ethereum would just be fairer to the bounty hunters and the investors do not need to be afraid that bounty hunters are dump their tokens. I hope some good projects pick up on this idea.

a pretty good because the discourse naturally with paid with bitcoin is certainly easy to sell or already have a guarantee that the coin was worth. but it will need considerable funds from the organizer's bounty because certainly need huge funds to allocate bitcoin as payment. and of course, other destinations from paid with coins ICO is a way for promotion as well.

Agree with you . I also received an award at ETH and for me it was very convenient

I think it would be very good, it will attract more bounty hunters to get involved in the projects and help with marketing, spread the words about projects to more and more investors, more investors know about the project, more money they will receive, it's a win-win situation when both sides are happy.

Why are the ICOs do need make this? You are taking part in bounties to earn perspective tokens, even before these coins are going live on exchanges. This is the core idea of bounties, and I think ICOs should not change it.

I participated in only one project with such payment. Payment really was very small. As for investors, I believe that it is the early investors who are derailing the price of a coin! Hunters receive 1-3% of the issue of the coin and not all sell it at once. But buying a coin at 40-50% cheaper than the stated price ... there is much to throw the price. If companies do not at the early stages attract such investors-traders, then I am ready to receive my payment in tokens. Although, of course in a stable crypto is more reliable

I heard 4-5 months back about a project that pays in bitcoin but did not remember the project name. I could not participate in that project because the limitation of the bounty hunter such kind of bounties requires limited no of participant. Even I believe if we get fix money in btc rather than coins it would be beneficial for a project to avoid the dumping of coins as most of them always blame bounty hunters for dumping. If we receive bitcoin/ethereum as a reward from new ICOs certainly they can gain back the trust they lost by paying valueless coins. I agree with your thoughts of paying in eth/btc.

I keep searching and joined that kind of bounty if it exists this days because that is the best for me than our regular bounty reward the ICO tokens because we don't need to wait for it to be listed on exchange, instant income and fix.

They cannot do that because they do not have the money that they are paying the bounty hunters, they are using their tokens to pay in the hopes that their coins is going to do well. I don't think that there are any bounties that are still paying out in bitcoin, they cannot afford to do so. They can only do so with their coins and hold it from the bounty hunters

I wish it would have been very possible, I would have love it, but the actually truth is that it's not really possible, because I don't think the team would want to use the project fund contributed by the community members and pay the hunters,

I have asked this question many times too. Why not pay hunters in Eth or Btc? The ICO team are very selfish and don't care about their tokens value. That is why they dish out loads of their coins to bounty hunters but keep their eth or btc safe in their hands alone. As a result when bounty hunters need to get their rewards, they sell the tokens at dirt cheap prices, thereby devaluing the coins

This is what most bounty hunters want because there are many projects after the token distribution, the value not achieved as promised. Paying bonuses with Bitcoin will help bounty hunters become more active with their work.

I think it's a good idea, because as we know we as bounty hunter help promote their ICO and they get payments using BTC or ETH, so bounty hunters also have to get payments from BTC or ETH, because the allocation of the bounty hunter is the total income earned at ICO, so bounty hunters should get payments using BTC or ETH and not get payment with coin from their project.

I think it's a really good idea, as it's much safer for a hunter than getting money in obscure tokens, which are then more likely to fall or not even come out on the stock exchange.

They won't do that anyway. If they are going to pay those hunters in bitcoin or ethereum then they will be more strict and only accept professional hunters which have a good skills. The reason why the pay bounty hunters with their token is that bounty hunters accept token from ico even there is now value at all until the ICO is successful. So if they're going to pay in bitcoin or ethereum them it's a big lose for them if they only reached the softcap and I'm sure they will hire professional because they want to make sure that all their hunters really contribute in a way they like.

I prefer the tokens over bitcoin or ethereum. As I believe that it also shows that you are really interested and believe the project you are currently working with.

This will certainly be the best option for any project that actually wants to see improvement and maintenance of its value. It is natural to see lots of projects dump massively upon listing due in part to the fact that bounty hunters tend to dump their token rewards. Meaning the supply is always greater than supply in the open market making the prices to drop drastically. If a project pays hunters with bitcoin, not only will it maintain the project value, it will attract more publicity for the project leading to a win - win situation.

maybe that's a good thing, but it looks like the project team won't do it. they prefer to use their coins, because jales is more profitable. they don't need to spend money on bounty hunters.

It will be very good for bounty hunters, but this will be extremely rare because it is much cheaper for companies to pay us with their tokens, there were very few companies in my memory that paid in Ethereum or bitcoin, but few people adhere to this, unfortunately.

For me, as for a bounty hunter, this is a good idea, since I will be sure that I will receive my guaranteed reward and my efforts are not in vain! But for the ICO itself such a move is not very good ...

I think that they pay a reward in the tokens of their project in order to popularize it at the expense of us, so that there will be more users, more volumes on exchanges - something like that. It is necessary to seek a compromise on this issue between the bounty hunters and the project team.

Of course it's a great idea. But what developers will go for it? They already need money to develop and advertise their project, and then they still need to buy Ethereum or Bitcoin to pay for the work of bounty hunters.

If they make a bitcoin payment, they'il get the money out of their pockets. This time their coins will have no meaning.

it is a very extraordinary thing. but it seems impossible because the average ico project team doesn't want to spend money on bounty hunters. so it seems like all that is difficult to happen.

I prefer receive project token as my bounty reward than bitcoin or ethereum because their own project have a chance to gain more profit than btc or eth, be careful a lot of tokens will become worthless at the end, so project research is most important part in our bounty job

if that is the mode of payment that has been agreed upon, then by all means as long as they got paid.

As a bounty hunter, i would be really happy if all of the bounty program  giving Bitcoin or Ethereum as the rewards.
That way will not affecting the price that most people keep on blaming the bounty participant as if it's their false if the price of coins dropping when it ready to be trade in the market.

for now it may be difficult to find a project as you want it may be there but it is very small in number. indeed for bitcoin payments, it is highly sought after by some people because of the reason they get paid faster and sell it

Yes, it would definitely be better! although the coins of some projects grow several times larger than bitcoin itself. I’m paying for Bitcoins, because I wouldn’t have to have a listing for a few months, but I would also like to require KYC

If that possible, i would like to have all kind of bounty to have Bitcoin or Ehtereum as the reward, and perhaps not just in a form of Bitcoin or ethereum.
Another coins that already available in market like Ripple, Stellar will also acceptable for me.

So far, I've only seen a few bounty hunters rewarding ETH, so a lot of projects pay BTCs. And projects that pay ETH bonuses, their pool is usually not large  ;)

I will be really happy if ICOs will just pay us with BTC or ETH and not with their own coin. Although the idea is good for us hunters, I think some ICO companies won't agree with this.

That's actually a good idea to think of so that the investors can have others thing to blame as all they're about when their is dump is always cause by the bounty hunters and if is already shared in bitcoin or eth it will be all good mostly for we hunters.

Very funny plan)) Interestingly, who will it pay you large sums in these coins? Do you really not understand that at best hunters will get tokens that the developer will release. Virgos do not incur any costs. Some projects pay in bitcoin, but these are rare cases ...

icos are good and i believe that they will bring us a lot pf good events and nice additional income so do not be afraid of them

i thonk that icos and many other projects need not only bitcoin but other cryptocurrecncy for being called perspective

initially most ICOs are paid in bitcoin, now some ICOs still give hunters choices of payment in ethereum or ICO token at the point of token distribution. Last year ICO coin was preferable in its token but this year almost all coin had a very terrible price dump which makes bitcoin payment preferable. Bounty hunters entry to token market give a test to the liquidity of a token for at least some weeks of exchange listing.

This has its advantages. First, bitcoin is traded on all exchanges that are only there. Secondly, it is not necessary to transfer bitcoin from exchange to exchange, paying extra fees

that would be really good if icos would pay their bountie hunters in bitcoin. the safest way would be for the bountie hunters, when the ico team use an escrow service, that guarantees, that the team really owns this bitcoins.

Previously, all campaign bounty was paid in ETH or BTS. None of the bounty hunters wanted to join projects where they offered to pay in project tokens. However, everything changed at the end of 2017, when a large number of newcomers came to the forum. They began to take part in any projects, even those where at the start it is clear that the project is fraudulent.
It is these people who devalue the work of bounty hunters.

Actually there are a lot of benefits to the team members of the project. They from the start cannot pay in BTC or ETH as they themselves need money for to start the project and in the end they want to pay in their token as they want us to use their coin and to be the community of them

In order to request payment in bitcoin or ethereum, the customer will require high quality work from the hunters. And more than half the hunters will be out of work. And if managers stop checking the quality of work, then the reward will be very small. There are enough examples when BTC was paid for signature. In this situation, much depends on the bounty Manager and his qualifications.

There are pros and cons for it. Bounty hunters would love it as they should not have to wait for the coin to be listed on
exchanges and that would insure the  value for them for their work done. On the other side why would ICOs do it if they
 can pay in their own tokens. But, still there are some ICO willing to pay the percentage of raised funds in ETH or BTC.

I think some ICOs already didi this. Most project pays boounty hunters with their own token because its much more cheap and its for awareness for their token and adding more holder. We saw that many project doing airdrop and i think its to increase awareness from market

I agree that if the bounty hunter paid with ethereum and bitcoin, but it all depends on the developer. In addition to not wanting to spend money, Developers do not want their coins to be quiet trading. Maybe there are some developers who want to pay with ethereum or bitcoin but only a little.

You are completely incorrect, bitcoin is the coin with the most volume so if bounty hunters were paid in bitcoin they will not crash the price of bitcoin but it is useless to even think about it because it is not going to happen since the developers are never going to do that since they will need money to pay so many people and most projects do not have any when they begin their development.

That's a good idea. I think it shows that the ICO project team is serious about their project and most likely not a scam project as they wanted to spend money to pay the bounty hunters with btc and eth. But it's very rare today to find a bounty campaign that pay in btc or eth. Daostack was the last bounty campaign that pay in eth.

hahaha looking at the huge number of bounty participants that would be very expensive for the project managers to bear. That is why they choose to pay in their native tokens rather than paying in btc or eth or any other major cryptocurrencies. A little suggestion though maybe they can be paid half in any major cryptocurrency and then half payment in their native cryptocurrency.

I think this is a good idea, I see some bounties that pays ethereum or bitcoin especially on service section. There is only two things I thought when they pay ethreum or bitcoin. First, they are legit and have funds to market their project which is a good thing. And lastly, they don't want to pay with their tokens/coins to avoid dump.

This certainly hopes any bounty hunter because it will be easy to sell the coins by the results of their work. but it will require a huge expense and certainly not recklessly brave projects issued capital of it it. Moreover, with the payment of coins from the ICO also helps these coins to be marketed so that it can be easily recognized by the investor is not merely a payment only.

Some ICO projects already pay for bitcoin bounty hunters and, more rarely, ethereum on this forum. However, of course, it is unlikely that all ICO teams will want to pay for the work of bounty hunters in Bitcoin or ethereum, since on the whole this is not very profitable for them. The task of ICO is to distribute its new tokens and collect bitcoins and ethereum, and not vice versa. If some ICO teams are interested in bounty hunters not lowering the price of their tokens after listing on an exchange, then for this reason as well they can do it.

If the bounty hunters payment directly bitcoin and ethereum the essence of ERC 20 tokens wouldn't become popular. No chance at all to know the newly platforms. Although receiving bitcoin either ethereum as a payment is hassle free or I mean effortless to exchange the tokens. Then I also think that the more ICOs adopted this kind of payment there will have a shortage of bitcoin supply and ethereum because the bounty hunters will choose to hold this coins. This is possible especially when the market is down.

That's a hard decision for ICO's I think because the reason why they start ICO's is to raise funds to supply their project or for them get instant money (if it is a scam). This will be a big advantage for Bounty Hunters and a Big Loss for ICO's.. Yes it is possible for them to pay their Hunters BTC or ETH so there will be no dumping of coin and also if ICO's only targeting to get their funds in their token itself..  Also this will prevent scam ICO's even just for a little because only legit ICO's could make a capital fund of BTC or ETH in running their bounty campaigns..  ;) ;) That will be a good thing if it will be implemented in this forum generally ..

I believe there are some project already implementing that kind of payment system even though it still not many of those kind of reward.
But if all of the bounty campaign giving that kind of reward, i would be happy to join the project.

yeah, you are right.
i will also be happy to accept ethereum or bitcoin as a gift. but i think it's not a good idea for their tokens.

it is likely that this will hurt some people.

In my opinion as a bounty hunter and a cryptocurrency trader, it is not a good idea to pay the bounty hunters a bitcoin or ethereum. I think it is really effective if bounty hunters will be rewarded the ICo tokens, in this way, ICO tokens will be more tradable in crypto exchange/s once the bounty hunters are going to trade their rewards and at the same time, trading volume is increasing.

I have not to see one ICO that pays Bitcoin or ethereum but how I wish this will be the rules or the tradition, but these ICO started at zero cost and they are paying with I owe you token that they created and a promise of a platform and a value in the market, it's very advantageous for them but not for us.

Last yearn many ICO and bounty campaign use bitcoin only for payment, but is just for signature bounty campaign, you can check the profile of bounty campaign manager Yahoo and ask him about still have bounty campaign use bitcoin as payment.

      It's a good idea since it favor to the hunters but actually it could be very difficult for the ICO TEAM if the projects is on going and underdevelopment which is not really sure of the success so generally it's not fair for the ICO .

If payment using Bitcoin or Ethereum for bounty hunters is a very good idea. So the volume of Bitcoin and Ethereum gets bigger and the crypto market will rise again. And bounty hunters will find it easier to make sales because coins are already listed on the crypto-coin market.

For bounty hunters, getting paid for their work in Bitcoin or ethereum would be very good. Some ICO projects already pay for bounty hunters in Bitcoin and very rarely in ethereum. However, it seems to me that this will not be very beneficial for the ICO teams themselves. After all, they distribute their tokens to collect bitcoins and ethereum. True, if they do this only to campaign signatories, it is not such a big amount. Especially if the ICO team does not want bounty hunters to influence the price reduction of their token after listing on the stock exchange.

if icos would pay their bountie hunters with bitcoin, it would surely be the best for everyone. the participants have coins that have a real value and the token price can not be pulled down when bountie hunter sell their tokens. that is why it would be the best solution for me.

They used to pay bounty hunters with Bitcoin I don't know why it is stopped bounty hunters will definitely want to receive their rewards in Bitcoin or ethereum and they can even protect their coins from dumping because only investors and the team will own it.

It's a great idea. But the vast majority of ICO will never go for this. They simply do not benefit from it. Why pay hunters for bounty real money when you can pay wrappers that are not worth anything and it is not known whether when it is for them a good price. Therefore, it is very difficult to find such bounties and places in them are almost instantly filled.

Since most ICO's get the bulk of their money in Ethereum it would make more sense to pay in that currency rather than Bitcoin. It fact you could even take this idea one step further and set up the smart contract that people are sending their investments to, to send a defined percentage of the money taken in to the bounty manager who would be responsible for distributing it to the participants.

It would be awesome and a win win situation for everybody. First of all, people would get paid in a very valuable currency. Secondly, there would be no price dump after listing on first exchanges. A great solution.

This strategy is also requested for every bounty hunter so the token's they gonna get will no affect is the price of the token will dump. It's also good for me to get faster our reward in a short day after workig on their project.

I can only fully support this idea. That would really be a good solution to pay the participants in eth or btc. This would ensure that bounty participants not only receive worthless tokens for the work they have done.

While that sounds good, paying in BTC is more likely can't be done, most of ICO are gathering the funds through ETH or other smart contract platform, maybe in some cases it is possible
but just think about it, the less their token get involved into some kind of activity the more chance it will become useless.

There are some ICOs paying out in stable crypto,but point is that it isn't cost efficient and it isn't original matter of bounty.
Giving out original token increase awareness

basically this..

but sometimes they change on how they pay the bounty hunter though.. like they want to avoid some complication later on with the regulation so they switch to pay in ETH instead their native tokens like what happens with daostack.

Well i think it might work for bounty hunters. If the projects pay in bitcoin the tokens cant dumped by bounty hunters. But the problem is if the ico cant collect big money bounty hunter will get less profit. I never join a bounty campaign with bitcoin as reward before.

For people who wants fast money they prefer to have BTC or ETH with their bounty works.
But there are some participants who wants to have tokens which can give them more money.
Remember that there is a fix rate in BTC campaign while in token we are on staking which can give more numbers to us.
I prefer tokens to have and sell them at high in market.

Bounties in the first place is a very cheap form of advertisement and I am not sure how many projects can even pay all their bounty hunters in bitcoin. I think it is too expensive to them. Also, payment in bitcoin sucks real hard at this dip because of the volatility in case you bought it last year or beginning of this year when the values were quite high. Paying in their native tokens is very cheap and can easily be afforded by them that is why they always pay in their native tokens.

There are some campaigns who pay their particpants using btc you may take a look on this board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0.

That would be a great idea however for sure they will reduce it and one thing that I can see why they pay using their own token so that it will create a volume after releasing it to hunters but still it may cause dumps.

This is a good idea, but I don't think it will happen. The ICO project belongs to the startup team. They are not willing to invest a lot of money. They prefer to use their own coins as a reward. If Bitcoin is used to pay for a reuse contract, the ICO may be resurrected and the scammer is not willing to pay a high fee.

I don't think it's important to use which cryptocurrency ICO project as a payment method. The important thing is that the project should allocate rewards on time and by volume。

Yes ,that is true ,it does not matter what cryptos are to be rewarded to the bounty hunters from ICO projects , if they pay bitcoin then so much the better ,the important , the labor of the bounty hunters are rewarded by their respective  ICO bounty project.

the hope of many hunters certainly paid for with coins the obvious can be sold at a high price. but to be able to join in the bounty that pays with bitcoin is not easy. strict regulations and the need to work more than another bounty and even a limited number of participants in this case.

I think it is a good idea to pay Bounty hunters in Bitcoin or Ethereum because it solves 2 problems at the same time: the dump of the project' tokens price and low income for hunters.

yes, paying in bitcoin or ethereum is a good idea but most ICo's won't do that, they rather pay in their own tokens. I think it might be too expensive paying in bitcoin or ethereum.

- Of course bounty hunters always want to receive rewards that are token or coin because the value of these rewards, although it is not so clear, we can say it as a lottery game but the bounty hunters still love it when each reward always has a huge chance for them to get huge amounts of money. Especially the rules for joining are very simple, many bounty hunters can optimize rewards when using multiple accounts, but if the reward is bitcoin, things will not be easy for the hunters when the requirements are harsh and higher, they can hardly use multiple accounts, even if they do not work seriously, forbidding participation is a sure thing to happen

They have to pay using their own token, this not only makes sense when it comes to the money they are spending, this also makes sense since they are distributing their coins among thousands of new users that will make use of this new coin, so I do not see any chance that most icos are going to change the way they pay their bounty hunters.

it looks like the best ico and has a very good product concept there are so many, you try to see and compare some of these ICOs through the available ico rating because there is an ICO expert who can help you to provide an evaluation of the ICO.

Then that will be very good and more people would be more inclined to actually do the bounties but the thing is that the projects do not want to actually pay us in their money so they give us their coins and tokens and if those do not get listed then we are just going to end up with useless coins. i wish they would actually pay in bitcoin though, we would make more

The idea is good, but then who will be the coin holders? After all, investing Ethereum and Bitcoin investors will be holders of project coins. Or will bounty hunters receive payments in bitcoins, while investors keep coins? Then it will solve many problems for both hunters and investors.

This is a really great idea. I don't  know why projects still not doing everything that way. After all, it is beneficial both bounty hunters and holders (investors) of tokens of the project, because in this case no one will dump the token price after the listing.

If possible i want every bounty program pay with bitcoin or eth but indeed that's hard to do so and pay with bitcoin or eth will ensure people get decent payment and they can cashout anytime because bitcoin and eth are available to trade on every crypto exchange and pay with bitcoin also will minimize the participants got scammed

That's right, so it won't be a project that wants to pay using bitcoin but it definitely uses low coins like its own coins that can be exchanged for altcoins such as ethereum. because I won't want ICO to pay a high price

I can say that if all projects will use the ETH as payment, it will be very good. Will give rise to ETH. Allows you to remove all complaints about hunters associated with obtaining tokens.

I would still remain a supporter of the payments in the new coins. This is an opportunity to get super profits, and since when working with a large number of projects, only such anomalies give an incentive, this is the best option.

actually paid using bitcoin, or eth is not a problem. however, sometimes a project requires people to make transactions on their coins. well, at this stage, investors, and boutny hunters play an important role in increasing the volume of trading. well, but there are some projects that pay using bitcoin or eth.

It will be a good way to pay bounty participants and it will motivate bounty hunters to do credible job. Project can reduce the reward and make it to be fixed, even if it is not much people will be happy to participate in campaigns that they can sell fast.

the worst thing that will happen is if bearish / bull occurs in bitcoin.

Owners will be confused in synchronizing salaries with the latest price conditions, and this has been very chaotic since the end of last year, so many projects choose to concentrate on ICO percentage shares only. at least need a stable coin for this.

I think using Bitcoin or Ethereum as a reward is a good choice. This allows us to save a lot of fuel costs during the conversion period, which is more conducive to our calculation of sales revenue and price.

I like this idea, and as far as I know, such bounty campaigns exist. But now I’m more worried about the question whether the situation with the bounty campaigns will improve at all and whether participation in them will be profitable in the future.

Of course bounty hunters would start to take Bitcoin instead of coins of some incomprehensible project. Still all clear how many they got, but when it comes to coin a new project... no one knows how much he earned, until the last)

it would be an ideal solution, but I think that it is unrealistic in the near future, and an example of projects that pay in BTC and ETH is not enough

I think here the community would be divided into several camps. There are people who catch ATH and especially on this and earn. In the case of Bitcoin, this is unlikely. He can't jump up to its ATH in the course of the day.

I think many bounty hunters would be happy to receive such payments. Remember the projects that offered to get their rewards in Ethereum... Almost all bounty hunters have chosen Ethereum.

Such projects are and have been, so it seems to me that you just need to look for them and be sure to view information about them in order not to get on the scam!

In my opinion it is actually positive. Basically ICO is held to raise funds in the form of btc, eth or other crypto as capital for the development of the project itself. Bounty campaign with payment in the form of bitcoin or eth makes hunters and even potential investors more enthusiastic and confident about ICO of the project. This can be one of the indicators that the project has the confidence and potential for success because it dares to pay bounty hunters with btc or eth in terms of supporting campaigns.

it's very good, but it seems no one will want to do it. for paying project teams besides using their tokens is a loss. they definitely won't want to spend money just to pay bounty hunters.

I have experienced or participated in a bounty program that pays participants using bitcoin. But not bitcoin, but Ethereum. But it's actually very good if there are projects that do that. In a sense, if the bounty is finished maybe you will immediately get a payment that you can sell directly without having to wait for the market because bitcoin and ethereum are also very many places to sell it.

I'll definitely going to accept whatever campaign that pays Bitcoin, but unfortunately we have none that's paying Bitcoin or any other tradeable coin right now, all bounty hunters are only getting tokens they are promoting, I doubt if we are going to have one now, because it's cost effective for the ICO.

I think that this is a good idea, since I have already collected a large number of coins that are not listed on the exchange. From this I see no reason to participate in the bounty.

It would be much better, because now I have altcoins without any value. Do you understand how is it possible? I can't sell tokens and get money for my job.
With bounties paying in BTC situation would be completely different

of course if it is applied to all ICOs it will be very good for and bounty hunters will prosper.
but what I questioned, ICO is a company that just started a project that has limited funds, do they have enough BTC or ETH to pay bounty participants?

It would be way better for both bounty hunters and for investors.

They are giving out 1m dollars worth of token and they are ending worthing 10k $ worth. If they just give out 50k$ worth of btc/eth bounty hunters would earn something real and investors won't get harm, because of bounty dump.

That would be a great thing. In fact, projects that pay with bitcoin are not much and the bonus is very little compared to the effort that bounty hunters spend. It is also a disadvantage for those involved in bounty campaigns. If they can improve the pay for bounty hunters, I think our market will be better when the bounty hunters work hard again.

I can ensure that there is no bounty campaign will pay bounty hunters in ETH or BTC, if there is so only few. While they're paying real money to run their ICO to collect ETH, BTC and other cryptocurrencies so I don't think they'll pay bounty in BTC or ETH and their own tokens is the best choice for bounty hunters :)

It is a good idea but I think it will be costly and risky to project owners. However, it is a generous way. Thanjs for bringing this up.

It would be the best solution for both parties, because bounty hunters would get stable crypto currencies and the projects would avoid the price dump after the first exchange listing. I am not sure what is the reason why they are not still doing this.

In my opinion. If an ICO project pays bounty hunters in the form of Bitcoin is a good idea. because we know together that bitcoin is the parent of altcoin and the price is very expensive. only if the ico project does that, I think it is rather difficult, because they will need large capital.

I agree 100% with your idea, paying a bounty hunter with BTC or ETH can reduce the risk of token price dropping when enters the market, because most bounty hunters directly sell tokens they get.
usually they allocate 3% -5% of tokens sold but still pay with the token itself not from the proceeds of the sale in the form of BTC and ETH.

No one will pay Bitcoins and Ethereum to participants of bounty campaigns. Why do this? Most of the bounty hunters agree to work for the food (tokens) of the project. If there are many who want to work for small awards, why pay more?

I think that is a great idea but most of them can't afford it , because they need to fix some money for that , and if they cant touch their hardcap , it would be hard for them to do that , I'd like that idea though.

Most bounty hunters will prefer to be paid in Bitcoin if possible. This will ensure that the bounty hunter does not end up with shit coins when the project  fails.

I wouldn't refuse if I were offered this type of payment. Like everything here, I think. But if I had created a project, I would prefer to pay rewards in my tokens, as it's obvious that it's cheap.

It would have been the most effective means of payment, but it do not know why they are not doing that. At least the accusations levied against bounty hunters would have been eradicated and they would have known that bounty participants are not that ones contributing to dump in price. There are even times I wondered why blame hunters for occurrences like this.

I think that this would be extremely wrong as the project has to pay out exactly his tokens. only those people who are really interested in the project will participate in this way.

I think this is a very good idea, but it is unlikely to succeed. One of the reasons is the fact that ico administrators will not want to lose the resulting cryptocurrency, it is easier for them to give tokens or coins, as they often have no value. That is, ico collects money, cryptocurrency, and in return it gives - tokens or their own coins, which at the initial stage cost practically nothing. There have been cases when tokens did not want to pay, but these are already those ico that turned out to be scam or fraudsters. In any case, hardly even honest administrators will want to pay, although you are right, payments at BTC or ETH would raise the rating of such ico tons and make them more successful.

This is good of course on the side of bounty hunters but if you’re a project developer its quiet risky for you to do that. Its hard to raise funds right now through ICO so most of the project failed and they just lose the money without even touching cryptomarket. If bitcoin will be use to pay the hunters, I think the volume of fake projects will be lessen, and more hunters will become more happy. But its ok also to receive the token, most especially if its a real good one.

The idea is good, but projects on the contrary profitable to pay tokens to save a little money, only some bounty managers saw that pay in bitcoins and Ethereum

A very correct step, alongside the return of confidence, will protect investors from falling rates. Secondly, it is possible to ensure a more systematic selection of hunters.
So in this action, I see only positive things. But the question is, who of the companies will start doing this?
Implement this idea will be incredibly difficult.

yes, I agree with you. I think that paying with bitcoin or ethereum will be more promising than other coins, because bitcoin and ethereum are the most popular coins and have a fairly stable price, so there is no need for lots of coins scattered while worthless. but is our opinion heard? who will grant it?

Bounty hunters will be in a hurry to join ICO that pays via Bitcoin and ethereum or any coin that you can trade in the market with a good price, I read that in the past they do offer Bitcoin and Ethereum payment but not anymore, I'm looking for one hope one ICO will come up.

I think it will be a good idea since they receive ethereum and bitcoin, in exchange of their token. And also since people hate bounty hunters for dumping the coins and causing price decrease.

of course this will increase the trust of all investors and also bounty hunters themselves might consider taking part in this investment
beforehand, make sure first, if the developer must use a third party or escrow to make payments, so that funds are safer and justice is created between business people,
because we often know that some people leave their own bounty hunters without any payment, because they don't use third party services or maybe smart contracts

Yes.  This is a very good idea, but not always, there are a number of projects that have a great future and I am sure that it is better to receive product tokens in them!

I think it's much better, because you don't need to worry anymore about the price of the project will have, when listing in exchange
right? but most projects give payments using their tokens, rarely pay directly using bitcoin

I would like to participate in such a project! Pay Bitcoin or Ethereum is a great idea. In this case, the bounty hunters will benefit and be safe, because some coins appearing on the stock exchange immediately depreciate.

The bounty payment method using Bitcoin (or Ethereum) is a good idea. But with a note, the related project uses a trusted escrow agent to avoid bounty participants not being paid from their hard work.
Besides that, this method can also prevent the bounty hunters from dumping an ico coin/token in the market.

I think this thing sound like be reasonable but it is hard to become the reality because projects just want to get Bitcoin or Ethereum as much as possible and spend risk part for investors and bounty hunters

What you are telling was being done in before ICO was introduced , their was bitcoin or eth payment system only was follow in bounty. But when they started to take investment and selling their token or coin in ICO way, they stopped paying in btc and eth and started to pay through their own token / coin. This way they secured their investment and left their coin to bounty hunters and dont care about it.

It will be good option if they start back the old system of Project investment system and bounty system.

I also think so, not worried about the price that plummeted after the ICO is completed. This positive thing that will make the ICO with the method of payment will be flooded with so much bounty hunter.

No company that issues its tokens will agree to such a step.On the part of the bounty participants, it seems to me even better to get paid for work in tokens.Just many of them will be able to give x.Accordingly, the more tokens In your wallet the more likely you are to get more profit.One problem with tokens is a very frequent lack of listing on exchanges. If you receive payment in tokens, there is no guarantee that the token will be sold. If all projects immediately after the bounty were listed on the exchanges, this would be very cool.

if all ico pay the bounty hunter with usdt or btc even eth I think the campaign must have restrictions on participants. I have participated in several campaigns where participants were limited and the results were also very satisfying despite the payment of the ico coins.

I think there is no difference what kind of currency will have to receive payment bounty hunters, it is much more important that the project after the end of the ICO could redeem their tokens from the bounty participants, then this will help to have a token price at a high level.

if the payment is only bitcoin, maybe the bounty hunter will not bother having the income from the tokens / coins they get, and maybe if you use the paid bitcoin rewards that are offered stable but you could say a little in my opinion

This is a very bad idea. Since the founders of the ICO will have to spend large resources to reward bounty hunters. Consequently, the people who invested in this project will suffer huge losses. It is best to analyze well in the project in which you are involved. And wait for the price of altcoins to rise.

All bounty hunters will go for this kind of ICO, everybody wants to get paid for Bitcoin and Ethereum, but unfortunately, there is no campaign that pays Bitcoin and Ethereum, even a coin that is already in the market, might as well go for new coins that already in the market if there is one.

It is not a bad idea, it maybe a good idea for both hunters and ICO companies. In ICO company side, If they paying with bitcoin or eth, they won't worry about the price of their token because the hunters won't dump their token at below ICO price. In bounty hunters side, they will know that they will get a fix reward without worrying about the price of the token they want to sell later.

obviously, this will make all bounty hunters happy and more eager to work, but the bounty manager must be more strict in regulations so that no one cheats with some bot accounts. I really hope that both the ico and sto projects do this  :-*

Why should they pay bounty hunters when the projects fails. When the project fails they walk away saying the project is canceled who cares the bounty hunters.

Most projects do not pay bounty hunters in bitcoin and ethereum because the fact is that those projects do not have the funds to pay for such payments so they go with what they do have.

Paying bounty hunters in native tokens is a strategic move because it helps create more holders of the token and additionally, this would create more liquidity when they decide to go on an exchange.

No matter the amount a coin is sold before lunching on exchange, there is no guarantee it will sell above or even at same price after listing. Most times, people blame it on bounty hunters. So if hey think bounty hunters are the ones at fault, then they should be paid in another currency in the market.

I think that it will be only good for bounty hunters because ICOs have to spend their raised funds to pay bounty hunters. But if the ICOs send them tokens, they do spend single dollar on it ;).

This seems very difficult to implement. Project owners always want to pay with their coins. So we see that very few bounty programs pay by BTC, ETH or USDT.

At the falling market, it's better to pay with ETH and BTC! At the growing market, it's better to get money in tokens to increase the chance of finding a worthy project! But I'll be glad if projects pay what they've promised.

That's a good idea. I'm very happy if the developer pay us with btc instead of their token, cause usually when it comes to exchange, their token value is surprisingly dumped hard. And if they pay us with btc, the price is at a good rate.

 there are some bounty of ICO that paid with bitcoin. but it's hard to join, because you must have a good post on your post history to be accepted in their campaign. but it will be good if all ICOs paid all bounty hunters with bitcoin. because if we paid by token, the estimated price will be different after the token list on market, especially after it dumped.

I am not sure if it will be a good idea or not. The distribution of a project's coin to the bounty hunters do somehow affects its popularity which would have positive effects to the demand and eventually, the market price of cryptos. On the other hand, paying only Bitcoin to bounty hunters will surely save the project coins from downtrend. So maybe, it would have both positive and negative effects. It would be better to spread awareness that holding is more necessary.

In my opinion if only in bitcoin there is no chance to have other types of coins. I prefer different types of coins. If paid via bitcoin, of course their coins won't sell. They develop their coins and will pay for participating in their project with their own coins. Actually it doesn't matter what you want to be paid for, the important thing is that you get paid and don't waste time.

Some projects that I get pay using Ethereum and in my opinion, it's very good. Especially if the paid hunter is using Bitcoin is certainly much better. Because it will have an impact on the price of Bitcoin whose price will continue to soar upwards.

This is a good idea, but only those who conduct ICO are unlikely to do so. I think that it is not profitable for them. They will be much more profitable to pay in coins than Ethereum or bitcoin.

Depends on how transparent an ICO is.
Some ICOs doesn't even want to involve their BTC in bounties at all.


Lol. That doesn't how the market works.

Viewed from a community perspective, the method of payment will provide a higher return. Bitcoin and ethereum are good enough quality coins and their value growth is quite productive. So that it can be useful in the long run. Different from the point of view of the ICO team, they will incur higher costs for the method.

If ICO pays Bounty participants with Bitcoin, it will definitely make ICO increasingly attract everyone's attention. And the impact on Bitcoin is that selling value will continue to grow because investors will definitely invest in Bitcoin. But is that possible because so far many ICO projects have used the Ethereum platform.

 
For bounty hunters it will be beneficial as they would not have to wait for their rewarded tokens to be listed
on exchanges with an uncertain value. Those campaigns should with limited number of participants, otherwise
they would be overloaded. The question is, why would the ICOs  pay in BTC, when they can pay in their tokens.
What would be the benefit for them.

Many bounty hunters dream of such changes in the market. After all, it will be possible to get a better and more reliable reward. Unfortunately, the projects themselves are unlikely to be interested in such changes. Because in this case they lose an effective way to advertise.

It would be a good strategy for hunters. For projects - in that case they can demand only high quality actions from hunters to promote their idea. For example not to use bounty social accounts which are full of bounty ads and not effective.

Interesting idea. But pointless. Most of the campaigns send their tokens, to use inside of their ecosystem. For example for tokens of Huobi Russia bounty, i will pay smaller fees on exchanges. And will have more bonuses with them.

I think the bounty hunters would really like that idea. If they were paid with bitcoin or Ethereum, then they would have a guarantee that their work would be accurately paid, that they would get good coins for their work. And I think that they would perform their duties more diligently.

This is a good idea, but unfortunately it will never come true, as it is in any case not beneficial for developers.

If it is already agreed that bounty hunters will be paid in btc or even eth, it would have been the best. I came across a project, whose name is Desico. This project claims it is issuing out security tokens, although not registered with any regulatory body.
After bounty participants had worked for them, it was now later announced that they will not be paid, so i was thinking that can't they be paid in eth or btc, since they do not want to pay in their security tokens.

In the early stages of this forum, when BTC and ETH prices were still very low, many projects used them to pay for bounty activities. Many projects now issue their project tokens as a bounty, a non-capitalized campaign.

I will be happy for both Bitcoin and Ethereum, the main thing is that there would be a good price on it and it would be possible to earn more!

in fact, recently, the companies that paid remuneration of Bounty Hunters in Bitcoin or Ethereum almost imperceptibly remained unnoticed. Perhaps the developers thus secure themselves at the time of failure.

Yes I side with you I think it's a great idea to pay bounty hunters in BTC or ETH rather than their own ico's as it's a more stable form of payment and can be more useful.

In order for this to happen, the project needs regulation and external financing, so that their financial part is insured, for this it is necessary that their token has a price and does not collapse.

Conside about they are about creating a new coin and that makes sense to change the payment into bitcoin or ether, but there was a lot of platforms have been doing it. Metahash is the one who has paid bounty hunters in ethereum form.

hell yes it's something i have been saying all along. it would provide a lot of stability for bounty hunters who could make it their full time work, it would also be added security for the hunters, im sure if majority of the hunters demand BTC it is very probable.

With the market deteriorating, using relatively stable coins to pay is something most hard-working people are eager to achieve. Only in this way can people be better motivated to work.

That would be a great idea for the project and for all of us. Because after ICO finishes usually the bounty hunters go to the exchange in the first day and sell thier bounty coins with anormous cheap price. This would mean to kill the coin at the first days.. The bitcoin payments could stop this big problem.

Paying bounty hunters in Bitcoins or Ethereum is a very good idea, but there are very few such bounty!

Since I know bounty, I only see 2-3 bounty is paying by ETH. But only 5-10% pool, it is very difficult for them to pay bounty hunters by ETH or BTC because their project may fail in the ICO stage

This idea is awesome! But not for all) This is good only for bounty hunters and investors of the ICO. If we are talking about the team, they are not very happy to pay you for you job with real money, they prefer "money from air" - tokens)

Paying for bounty hunters for participating in ICO bounty campaigns with Bitcoin or ethereum would be very good and I think that the majority will support this. Some ICO campaigns pay for the services of Bitcoin bounty hunters and the number of participants there is always limited and, as a rule, accounts from the full member and above are required. At the same time, the required number of participants in the ICO signature campaign is filled in the table in a matter of hours.
However, in general, ICO teams are not profitable to pay for the work of bounty hunters in Bitcoin or ethereum. On the contrary, they accept these coins and seek to distribute their tokens.

I believe that this is counterproductive, as projects should promote their own coin. If I was a bounty hunter, I'd prefer to get paid in ethereum or bitcoin. But on the part of the investor, I would have behaved more cautiously, since investing in the project, I get the project tokens for their further growth.

Yes, this is a good idea, but unfortunately we don't know that people who make ICO are really eth or btc in their hands. for this, escrow should be used or it may be appropriate to make payments weekly.

Personally, I think it would be great for bounty hunters to receive rewards in Bitcoin or ethereum. But then why would tokens be needed? And so they will be needed for rewards that can then be sold on the stock exchange and exchanged for the appropriate coins. Since this is all happening then you need to do as it really is.

I personally think it is a good idea for projects to pay their hunters in ETH or bitcoin because it will help the project from dumping hard on the exchange and also,  the team will be able use the funds raised for good purpose.

I think that at this time the actual topic is generally any payment to bounty hunters, so as long as the bounty of the company temporarily extinct. There are only a few potentially good projects, but they are still very few and extremely unstable.

The days where bounty pays in bitcoin was gone. I've witnessed the rapid appearing of those bounties that pays in bitcoin but suddenly after the all time high, they were all gone and popped like a bubble. I guess you just missed those days where there are 5-10 bounty campaigns that you can choose to participant and take note that the funds were escrowed.

The annoying part now is that they don't even want to pay bounty hunters anymore it's either the telegram group disappear or the lock the bounty tokens for 3 to 6months when the token don't worth anything

Yes, this will be a very good solution for everyone and to restore everyone's trust. Some projects have payments for Bounty participants using Ethereum and that is a promising project. And if there is a project like that, there will definitely be more bounty hunters or investors who join. And this will increase the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Previously, there were bounty campaigns that paid in bitcoins. But nowadays a lot has changed and I have not seen projects that pay in bitcoins. But you can find campaigns that pay in ethereum, although it is also very rare.

This is a good thing. If all ICO projects use Bitcoin to pay the bonus, this will effectively increase the hunter's profit, and the price of Bitcoin will become more stable.

YES it would be very good, but there will not be any for several reasons, and the first reason is that by paying the reward with any other coin they support not their project but someone else's, the second reason is that they need to transfer the collected money to the participants of the bounty thereby reducing their bank they will spend on project development.

Simply because, developers itself ain't sure whether the project will be supported and if they can manage to collect enough funding to develop their project, aside from that they also aware that there's no assurance that they can manage to survive if they won't be able to get enough investors so they don't want to lose their money or to share those funds right away from the bounty hunters.

This has become history. As far as I know, the forum used to pay for jobs through Bitcoin or Ethereum, but now these benefits have disappeared and will not appear in the future, as the future bitcoin will become expensive and there will be no more bitcoin payments.

bitcoin payments in necessarily are paid extraordinary. However, for it certainly takes the bounty with an exceptional allocation. but of the many bounty payments by results are not even big bitcoin and gives only a small amount of the fee. even other bounty proved promising and larger in payment.

The idea you mentioned is very good and feasible in the future. I think this form will ensure the effort and time for Bounty hunters. Besides, it will shorten the waiting time on the floor compared to the allocation of Token and I support this.

People are going to be very disappointed if they think that is ever going to happen, many icos are not even paying their participants with the coins they created out of nowhere, what do you think it will happen if payments are offered in bitcoin or ethereum? There will be many times more scams than what we have now and that is a thought that scares me.

In fact, most bounty hunters are now dreaming of this. After all, such a reward for them is more profitable and safer. But it is unlikely that the projects themselves will be interested in such solutions. After all, it is more profitable for them to provide their tokens in order to successfully advertise their project and attract investors.

Since a lot of projects are scam, they will not give bitcoin or ethereum to the bounty hunters. If they give, people will invest more and the chances of being scammed is also high. That is why I think STO should be there instead of ICO.

There are some far in between projects that pay bounty hunters in BTC/Ether, you just gotta search bit harder for them.

Although this will be hard to find, I guess every bounty hunter should be able to be aware of themselves when they get tokens for the work they do. Payments that use bitcoin need to be done by someone who can make a positive contribution to a project that is followed, because every devs needs large capital to buy bitcoin. Until now, most of the bounty hunters only gave a lot of rubbish in this forum, few of them gave a minimal contribution to this forum. You already know, how many people have alt account to join the program bounty?

It would be great, but do not forget that there are many tokens that can be sold very profitably! Especially if the project has collected a lot of money! I sincerely hope that Saturn Black will bring profit to the bounty participants.

By the way, they launch 2 bounty campaign at one time!!

surely when the bitcoin price falls, all will be directed to the hunter bounty because the bounty hunter will immediately sell it to get income. I think that's not too good, more if bitcoin becomes a smart contract for tokens, if possible.

Bounty hunters would be unanimous for such innovation. But developers are unlikely to make such sacrifices, since they themselves are not 100% sure of the positive result of their ISO. And in case of failure, all risks simply fall on investors.