Bitcoin Forum

The famous address 1933 just started splitting... MK just woke up? Can it be connected to Gox?

https://blockchain.info/it/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a

Just wow haha

EXCITEMENT!

Too bad it isn't tagged with 'Shitload of money!', that was humour.

Lots of big old money moving around these days.

Mark is just laundering customers btc..nothing special  

New all-time high in Bitcoin days destroyed..and the highest three just happened in the last 2 months: https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed-min-week?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

This address had never paid out before and it last activity was on November 2012

Wow. Someone just realized they were rich.

Most definitely so its kind of interesting watching all this money movement over the last few days

Rather intriguing timing on this

Fascinating... and concerning at the same time.

Given the odd original number (111111.11) and the age there was some speculation that these were lost coins. Now we have proof the wallet is "live", the possibility this is a whale preparing to cash out can't be ignored.

It will be interesting to see how the market reacts to the news, I expect we will hear a lot of open discussion about this very soon.

Looks like a MtGox customer moving their funds. The BTC withdrawals from MtGox to the Main BTC address https://blockchain.info/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a (https://blockchain.info/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a) are listed below (from the leaks).

The early adopter sitting on $70m in BTC is probably shitting himself after knowing the hacker got all his personal details, passport scan, home address etc. He knows he's going to be a HUGE target for criminals.

It is also possible some gunmen were already sent to his home address and threatened to harm him and his family unless he transferred the bitcoins to the criminals. I hope this is not the case otherwise criminals now control all those bitcoins.  :-\


b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,e70f4a61-b6d2-43e0-aebb-7472ad034904,"2011-07-04 17:53:45",withdraw,-2841.45
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,08134fa1-52c7-4c4a-9916-5a78a7344ec5,"2011-07-05 15:09:19",withdraw,-1495.5
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,f8e186b0-d8ee-4064-be64-054258ca631c,"2011-07-05 19:00:10",withdraw,-1495.49999999
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,e5888c99-fc43-4bf0-82f0-9daa5fbbb28f,"2011-07-05 22:59:49",withdraw,-1530.98062227
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,426a0007-3797-4c81-8e37-f8fa2e835ed6,"2011-07-23 22:37:24",withdraw,-727.33370629
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,b02c1405-9cce-4b77-b7e5-237515027252,"2011-08-02 04:17:27",withdraw,-1
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,2308d9b6-1ee6-457f-966a-c198237cf449,"2011-08-02 04:45:24",withdraw,-1
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,7e128c5c-1e88-45f1-a17d-aded6c4b16e4,"2011-08-02 04:46:23",withdraw,-1776
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,168a83ac-a3a8-4051-b687-7b6f3bdb2dcd,"2011-08-02 12:36:03",withdraw,-232.1959
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,49c6387c-5d2d-4d42-b523-5c8844a16a97,"2011-08-02 22:32:58",withdraw,-933.91
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,1c361be6-e6eb-4040-b81a-e9386ca91f7e,"2011-08-03 01:23:48",withdraw,-1043.13305585
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,5ad790f6-0c3c-4cfc-8e63-e57e50342fa7,"2011-08-06 14:52:14",withdraw,-100
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,04f33017-b0a6-4c2d-b924-96fde5323e5c,"2011-08-06 14:54:49",withdraw,-5419.53237126
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,26d4c3a8-2211-466f-94d8-eb8dda1e7180,"2011-10-27 12:50:14",withdraw,-15000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,ef562979-e895-4932-82ee-530274d03b75,"2011-10-28 17:56:37",withdraw,-50
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,cfe0a762-0ae9-49b1-98ee-9594dcee823a,"2011-10-28 17:59:13",withdraw,-1913.98495583
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,fb883cef-040c-4ec1-80f3-da50f5c1eedc,"2011-12-04 06:52:58",withdraw,-0.4995
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,8a4b61f5-bb43-437d-82d4-d231bcec77ae,"2011-12-20 19:01:54",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,9fab3a11-0df4-45b4-bb56-ccbf25297e70,"2011-12-20 19:02:10",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,6bfce163-1133-45b7-8c58-8645f204f7a7,"2011-12-20 19:02:27",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,ce39ef5c-3657-4d92-a4d4-b3dbb21d86b3,"2011-12-20 19:02:52",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,e5562d1b-6932-4384-b5f9-debcfb03e911,"2011-12-20 19:03:14",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,10d69fbb-9f00-43e8-b445-5ccac706a9f1,"2011-12-20 19:03:24",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,61633710-e0be-4743-b8e2-945c2b302983,"2011-12-20 20:07:48",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,88146b9d-aceb-485c-b97b-d9b92e8a76fb,"2011-12-20 20:08:03",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,02802191-765b-4785-85fe-495f0742852f,"2011-12-20 20:08:12",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,3ad45bfe-69bf-439e-8d81-110c5b496b5c,"2011-12-20 20:08:25",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,e5beca8d-503b-4030-839c-b84d8490c369,"2011-12-20 20:08:39",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,01925733-af3d-4678-91dc-3044dcb567c4,"2011-12-20 20:08:48",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,206142fe-c6e2-44dc-9056-4dadd6561168,"2011-12-20 20:08:58",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,c03a05f6-87cb-4f96-9a96-d3b4de6f820f,"2011-12-20 20:09:15",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,3a1848c9-6dbd-40e5-aa6e-7cd1e35b273d,"2011-12-20 20:23:54",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,3cb1dc9d-a1cc-40c2-a684-30ced7a69f5d,"2011-12-20 20:24:07",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,34848e93-b754-4e0c-a1cd-b64f0932fcf4,"2011-12-20 20:24:18",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,027cc3b3-bcbd-4291-a254-5c896424e181,"2011-12-20 20:24:27",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,2ac84f8c-ca47-466a-a23c-ed70d9775341,"2011-12-20 20:24:38",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,f4bd5345-d519-4f12-8283-b46a4270eea0,"2011-12-20 20:24:50",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,ef2ce22a-f0c7-4eee-a196-329b3c5757bc,"2011-12-20 20:25:00",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,397a5929-f8b0-4241-a8ff-b8870d5faf61,"2011-12-20 20:25:10",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,53835d67-04c3-4914-8db4-d2c6dfa7f598,"2011-12-20 20:26:51",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,e74837c9-2be2-437b-8bb5-5d14de0952a2,"2011-12-20 20:27:00",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,234018b0-d8d4-452c-b10d-05ba50e9b1cb,"2011-12-20 20:27:55",withdraw,-1000
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,30f3abfe-733b-423b-92ee-087a62a84182,"2011-12-21 20:36:51",withdraw,-553.22580606
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,34fa39dd-8d36-4c28-ba99-d1e2d06f54be,"2012-08-25 20:52:05",withdraw,-3.12606703
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,5dea8eda-2593-4371-907e-daa51714dc93,"2012-09-29 18:42:41",withdraw,-1
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,82587589-b4b5-48d6-bf9b-c395f894c285,"2012-11-15 00:04:25",withdraw,-2070.69339415
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,95989adc-fe52-49ad-8a38-d73412c55ba9,"2012-11-15 04:51:58",withdraw,-3335.14918175
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,c8087502-b81b-4861-b707-b9556e591334,"2012-11-15 06:30:16",withdraw,-94.1574241
b169b66e-023c-462e-8ae4-9cb2db3f2219,72c1b538-8e56-48c0-9f45-6bf9701ae51a,"2012-11-15 23:41:01",withdraw,-2321.97214518

This is indeed a fear now that all historical data is available, one could easily link a username/email to a BTC address.

 Incredible. So many whales in one day.

Wait that's horrific. :-[

Don't panic guys, I just decided to move my money for fun to check if someone notices.

If you go to the address https://blockchain.info/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a (https://blockchain.info/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a) and scroll down, there is a message sent at 2014-01-24 01:44:41

Public Note: send 100,000 BTC to this address 1Ggta18qjjptCiAYwsQB3dmVphuu39aNHp, or i will kill you. I know how you are...

:-\

Note the same message was sent to at least 2 other addresses in Jan 2014
https://blockchain.info/address/17ewBhK712mY2E4uPAbinThibdY2LRyabd
https://blockchain.info/address/1CvPC3zQ4xPL4ZcFWwfS3D8cmTgQSVcp2P

Probably just like all the other "begging" in public notes to addresses with large balances.

Sad part is that after this leak, someone really could know who the person is associated with that address.

i thought they were multiple users first. i cant seem to find any trades by this user, and it seems they dont have any balance left on the site

Anybody could send that. If they were serious i would think theyd atleast send a whole BTC. lol... fractions of a btc dont really speak volumes

Another Karp account consolidating with the rest, though these seem to be stopping on 5k splits with a chunk of ~1,166 ish going on its lonesome.

That's disappointing although for 100,000 BTC I think the address on the receiving end is the one in the most danger lol

Not necessarily. It can't be a coincidence that this happens immediately following the internal database leak from Gox - see thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=508162.0

It's quite possible Mr Whale here is concerned with being publicly identified from information contained in the leak, or at least a risk from anything they redacted from it but still in the hacker's hands.

I'm not a data extraction expert, is anyone here able to cross-check the 1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a address as well as any addresses that were significant inputs to it to see if this aligns with any of the data there?

If you can - thanks in advance.

Here's the updated path: (linked instead b/c the image is large)

https://i.imgur.com/iwZHSSV.jpg (https://i.imgur.com/iwZHSSV.jpg)

^ Was just doing that myself. Interesting how its hitting a couple different country's addresses. How does blockchained know the country? IP correlation?

There was a large withdrawal of 15,000 BTC which could only have been made from an account with "Trusted" Status.

For trusted status, physical copies of the documents must be sent by mail and they must be certified by an apostille.




It is possible, but why would Mark Karpeles need a MtGox account to move bitcoins? Or could this be Mark's personal account?

I still think it is more likely to be an early adopter who is concerned about being a target now that their private details are being passed around criminals. Or that the criminals already got the bitcoins through coercion at the individuals private residence.

Anyone who has withdrawn thousands of bitcoins from MtGox should split the bitcoins into many different wallets and then send them to another exchange such as btc-e and then withdraw them to encrypted wallets and hide/bury them. This will break trail through the blockchain.

Just blech.  The whole thing continues to be irritating.  I was a verified, trusted user, but exited last year.  My holdings are safe, but I'm assuming my information is in a digital pile with everyone else, waiting to be sold to the highest bidder; all the while we have what looks like Mark moving close to 300,000 coins around after declaring bankruptcy.

If the final story culminates in Bitcoin Foundation involvement, shame on me I suppose.

https://blockchain.info/address/1HoTTpCYwAkoR3FCvoRT8WM8UPosYh3S6J

Very high probability the 111K is a gox controlled address. At least two gox deposits are confirmed to have been consolidated into this addr.

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

I think its assigned on every thread isnt it?

The truth will probably be stranger than anything we can imagine right now. My guess is that the 311k coins that have been moving are still safely under trustee control.

Far more unsettling for MtGox users in general should be the fact that a large portion of blockchain has now been mapped directly to specific users (or can easily be), with ID scans, addresses etc. and full trading histories, balances, etc. The entire data dump was supposedly sold at least once - likely several times - for a paltry 100btc.

The Target card skimming scandal is nothing compared to this.

He was even willing to sell parts of it for 10BTC if people didn't want the whole thing.

Nah, most of the threads are indexed by search engines. Go have a look at the source of just about any other thread page, no robots meta tag...

Odd, so I guess the mod's must have a way of enabling it on individual threads.

What makes this thread worthy of such a tag?

Perhaps I spoke too soon. Not quite so certain now. Good one...

In fact, Google indexes this forum instantly, unless instructed not to. I just went to a random thread, then copy and paste a phrase submitted minutes ago and searched for it via Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&oq=I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64l3&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=%22I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized%22

I've noticed it before being in place with other quasi-controversial threads, but opted to not call it out, kinda hoping/guessing that it was an anomaly.

Only an admin would have such privileges, and would have to be available and know that such was warranted.

So maybe after page 1 it puts that or something? That's what the SMF forum people are saying about it.

Must be nice!

Now it just changed to the above, and Google has this thread index, whereupon it wasn't there a few minutes ago, as I have shown and everyone here would have experienced the same thing I did at the time.

Allegedly its prevent search engines indexing duplicate content, which is very bad for SEO.

Also from briefly reading a couple threads over @ the SMF forum on the issue, in this version of SMF, the search de-duplication doesn't work well.

I'm excited, as it is someone probably getting ready to dump.

Got it!

Post #4 was indexed, but post #5 onward was when the robot/no-index was manually put in place.

The following thread was just created, but no robot/no-index meta tag is in place: mtgox is really hacked again? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=508949.0)

I just noticed when I referenced a different thread from my watchlist (i.e. goto "new" posts) the noindex directive is given. This would support the theory that SMF sets it on "special" pages to avoid duplicate content for crawlers.

When I open the same thread directly from the main forum list, noindex is not in the source.

/end side-track.

This is what I'm seeing (below) with having only Page #3 of this thread in view:


Apologies for derailing this thread, for that wasn't my intent. I am though wondering if there's a direct correlation between the content of this thread and what's being released into the wild, hence this micro crusade.

Apart from this one , most of them are just begging ...
begging for house/car/crack/study.. and so on..

given the large # of gox withdrawls (makes it seem like they bought em on gox...), the timeline, and the large # of btc.... winklevoss twins?

Could 1933 belong to Theymos?

The plot is now thicker than Karpele's breakfast drink....

I'm kicking myself pretty hard every day.  You're not the only one

evrybody can wirite anything there , does not mean annything.

Is this the reason why the price of BTC is dropping at Bitstamp?

Probably just the normal volatility

The amount of btc in the hands of very few people is retaded. If the hacking and stealing continued, all of this currency will be in the hands of thieves and crash.

On the forum iam seeing the 4 post regarding a huge amount being transacted so its difficult to say who's money is it moving around it can't be all of gox one or two huge transaction might be them. So far no clue but i'll update the thread if in case i find any.

LOL,  I'm guessing Theymos must be one of the few people with 100,000+

The reptillians are going to declare control of the world soon.

Oh

It has been splitted in a bunch of 5000 BTC addresses. Still no news about its possible ownership

This address appears in the Kleiman Estate vs Craig Wright documents.

https://www.scribd.com/document/372445546/Bitcoin-Lawsuit

"The 2011 IP Agreement provides that Bitcoin wallet 1933***XYa8 would be held by Craig in escrow and revert to him if W&K defaulted, but the 2013 W&K Sale Agreement provides that it will
 be “released to” Craig despite satisfaction of the liability, and the 2012 Deed of Loan shows the wallet being placed into a trust by Craig with a notation that it  be held there until Dave and Craig can set up joint-companies later."

On the move again  - https://blockexplorer.com/address/1Jq4f2fCjBJBwiCmcmtz7CW8RTuamcfoQT

a list of 83 wallets with the amount of 999.99998156 BTC

1Jq4f2fCjBJBwiCmcmtz7CW8RTuamcfoQT
17Mbft2v8x2MXyFaQQAJFUFsEaNS2hx8Nj
161kViPB1QTxid9rHXCbQDFvS72Mgfc4y7
1EYREFWkPX3CyA5uk5CZByK1LRpRCgXorF
1LC1r8TX2SzZtzWAw6DTKXv32RWrvKbCLv
1y75TUkBQjVmg7C2GRA6rNX5V7b5Xhd7s
16SN3ifXtPLdX5Rr1eXxBs2kr9cCVGVbPD
1AeLVWnGSFRVrqsDQAtza9ETP8CQtMqQYy
1C1wc3A61FubqzHitPvCV82tDcesW4XC5N
1HurzjPqvy3dbGcBpf2zmEXGzqJuYP9hHm
1KfmQppd29BQjmPimfb73fRGDESzFybVn2
16pMWunTk5ayjPk91cc5ghp2DtygSmVosb
1DkP5oAi3PbyvLndmqsUyBPJ1zpqHfcHro
16Z6hLdk5GrHT7EQDPGdme3QtzbU4XtV24
12EMDoUhaNCuWZeeT6ey61AkjKyzmjV2m3
131gJ5QEpk74NdQKZC4FHW9q9N4htvdvUM
13CPuESGA1mA2RY7dvTmVkLZtHQv484K73
168w95Wf8tphgM7DPREXr8zLnVoE2wJCAN
1JBzBYhWwUDwukMF98E6odcEG2Cq2myK8W
1JWHZ9WKbwDkuC4nhN9cB7uaRcgA7dPbrA
12mGByfmJH16c5hQApi4N2eHJKfKrrf1fm
16EjMe6ufEzpGgDryRJni4XXe8fzaZHiVV
1P26cNQUjtcqJS5RjxGZY458Z7Nb6SJyRU
14KYPZVWh7PJ7P6qZBnWFmgvd7KZGkBZGt
1CHnxKrYjYc9pVX4Z8uMWKM3Gm5NCnh78e
17GURBUGs1WZN3DtqCDLeBFvznbBgQbAPm
15gzWMVtGqc26KiwmZW4F6UHgsF4KQhE4d
13xUA4QFq7wXAfpXL8jYEwJYmiDMmiMzDx
1GSq1Ca1uLDBdtAkbnK7YbhwcsEX7wCfZd
16ejCxMd4iz7UgGPU6jQP5rFbvSunJueJ3
175Vm3p3LWtJJdN5mSpv7RQWhx8tqUZzB5
1GgJLsrcfQ9EXsVosamCrK3DJTZB5a4dk1
1S2PWYeAEhNnpjizaAmrssfLi8Zfroxg4
1AyvHCZgfFcRLUCzs3W5vkyX195FCmsimK
1EAaETBVzBAYMdokQy6oDV3ndtsEgyNuZG
1N3iUA8sQXyv8pZekHEmmVx4JDZ98MPPBa
1LTxwgxWgt6qTb6843pMGpAAVZt1uhosq4
1NjqzRPtJ7ZFJHnF3VfM1rHkCCgYCbPNBo
14GHoKsHEfR618VFoz9ahLwzxcGkNEka3q
1mFwvE389NhZLe7TUKMA77qVcPNLzFUVd
12HQsSH5JXKphCyDhHG56s4hnLysX7qans
1JqT4EpwmHogj6gayzoM8sZ18nfLA8Fb75
17gBJdE7xd8Xs7UwotuAb8EbGbPy9TvfHK
17diY4cG7W1o16Q2Jy1MFJ7PVPLjJQ38Gi
1ABrBxtxCUjrw2MiV3AkYcUfq4fnhALASw
1NUKiX4WuhBxfd7cMxh2WRnukcNZAZ74Rx
1QAbhtkLCaNFFfGagPiqCMZecupKjZBBbh
1QL6KoM1uWtTEwQ7vJXY7J3Bpg5mMEzEag
1HW1jcfhke4W7SBUaxGUZQF9m5Gdcv6VJS
175zrR3z4PB3ug4YFBrk83tiCgbtfFGusm
1FHDkwWz8vuKqidGiwVwTcMgR4hncnXPiS
1BBXEhXcHAA8jvDUvtakz7Hz4zf41Q8zNg
1LNB1SmPSkgo1oduVUWcKmwAjSYkMXcScC
1F2bKNevAVDJbXy6kYPghqB7BTLtRzfkYb
1DktWqGjJQFmrKELt1nQrdJWmNMWBxGQV9
12bGpTNZp3PTeiJSnCFuSzP2EfnvWMatF6
15YEfnK5PpBWkBuNPYYFTeXLXRtyqsC9DH
1Q1SNLVNLbipKcNR412GEaggjyZmD9yfqE
1Pnvt4ttbvexku9EvQb7vRyBP5qRpRrGX6
122HCxHuCV4fdh9wH9ccB1BaSe2uQDTW7d
1JH2Yt4LWPkXjCw11GQpAf6SahjknVn9iL
1G6qkSuiwuXSsPT3VdEWyeWrvVwnjnUnCC
1ECQyPuL94zKHGguaweHi5d21zy7xHchsn
15JZnwq2NqSNtMPbBhdQddbyimay4xvGyA
1NDW9P5gb1tBxuAk2vjQqk25V7aUcmitPL
1NTNR2tKwKKV2uPpqnxeyVGhkqy442Gp6x
1J1xf1wSW27XjcZNc9Q9k4okdUUmHhhwsY
14Sdez3ZFMc4bFS4eezfc6DWo7T8mkHdFt
1PMULdAeRU9xiotfn9Yjhc4e9heb9bA1J6
1HS8i7yiFxiwkFyRGdp6wTYKajpf58BYdN
1FJqDzCYyqVbKm2cLJkuhtx8WztNzmwWNj
1D73bDndyazRE4PrHfsgQaR8AwLd1v31jA
1NGGanEWLAKgj9ZifEKiEVSAjzbhjwZQrP
16fKLByWc6dWY9tPPvY1SsajYsgDfsmwf9
13Foa8niJE2nHugJ28HYBUfx9Ww4QfS1pU
1FcM3U5XKLrYSx2CY4f3H9W8AZsKzFTVSA
1E8DA8t4NZthKF5MpzFwoV8gHumt3eHwyR
1FxDvUoEJU19Bq1ywQX7beQcqkn7cUp6jX
1HzodEgsb2TsvWAwY9pWBwJAVawXReD9KV
1513Qr2KAM88LY2FSCq5JCJyd4LorUYtgM
14PC55j5h7yT7bzXzAu4Tcco5JfGdWJMtR
1KxgoEBPRKFg2ZKEoN6aUm3UZ6WUeNwpZn
1QHDQi1PVaNNn7oZZAWAZCiqRmQWouv1ey

1933                                          ***XYa8
1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a

Is it the same wallet?

But I find it quite curious that the owner of the wallet decided to move it at this point where Craig Wright is in a battle with the Bcash fork.

Craig is not the owner of 1933 wallet, all the addresses which he claimed were either Mt.Gox addresses, or didn't even exist on the dates which he back-forged in the agreements. He even claimed the address where the stolen funds from the earlier Mt.Gox hack went was his. He is a well-known nut case, just picking random large addresses and claiming they are his. 1933 is most probably from SR.

Btw, I managed to find a link between 1LDN (Ross) and 1DKY (600k btc) wallets, by randomly picking and following one outgoing transaction from 1LDN. There are 50 intermediate addresses between these two wallets. Funds passed through Instawallet before being deposited to 1DKY. Someone who knows how to look for links non-manually, could try to find other and shorter links between these two wallets.

I might as well leave this article here, for those interested:

"The mystery of the 1933-wallet"

https://coinedtimes.com/the-mystery-of-the-1933-wallet/

This is very interesting. One would hope that this doesn't impact the price even further in a negative way.