Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 10:35:28 AM



Title: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 10:35:28 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: mdayonliner on January 17, 2019, 10:40:29 AM
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]
Dammit! it's another thread about Lauda  ;D LoyceV needs to update this: All topics about Lauda in Meta and Reputation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095631.0). Data are old now there.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Slow death on January 17, 2019, 10:57:26 AM
Lauda is a great member of this forum.

I remember this case: About Ethereum Plus (scam) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2053624.msg20474217#msg20474217)

Lauda was very helpful




Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Lauda on January 17, 2019, 10:58:58 AM
Yeah! I think we should set a new trend: Regardless of what the subject of your thread is, include the word Lauda in the title somehow.  :P


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 11:08:34 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.

I have proven he is a liar and gave me red trust from him for daring to say I would inform people of that FACT


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Harkorede on January 17, 2019, 11:16:21 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.


You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost cause... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 11:17:44 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.


You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.

Whilst you are about it can you present anything else you find that I am wrong about?  go on ... get on with it. Demonstrate all those things I have been wrong about because as yet NOBODY has demonstrated that I am wrong about anything.

Until I see a complete removal of red trust abuse on my account then NO i will not stop presenting facts that is should not be there.
Well done.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: TMAN on January 17, 2019, 11:23:10 AM
~snip~

FACT is no one gives a shit, please take all these personal attacks to the reputation section, you are really starting to fuck up meta. And no I will not remove my tags so you will leave us all alone - neither will the others.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 11:34:52 AM
My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 11:37:46 AM
My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.

are you completely thick as well....  your anecdotal experience does not preclude or protect or undo what I have proven he has done. Please start to understand this simple concept.

his own post history is not hearsay  - is there something wrong with you? do you know that something he has written himself which is a proven lie is not hearsay. You can understand this right?

I have proven he is a liar

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098591.0

I have proven he is an abuser of the trust system

I have proven his friend tman is an abuser of the trust system 2x now.

Do you deny either of those??

If so explain yourself now.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 11:41:24 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. :)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 11:42:35 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. :)

LOL .... ha ha that is refusal to review observable fact. Hmm a DT who says they are not interested in reviewing the truth. Is that what you are saying?

Well look the evidence is there above in this thread do you refuse to review it??

If so you need instant removal from DT and merit source you are not responsible.

I expect an answer or I want you removed from dt and merit source.

You can not as a DT refuse to read facts I am producing here for you to examine.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: TMAN on January 17, 2019, 11:43:12 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. :)

ah man, Legend...

JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 11:45:41 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. :)

ah man, Legend...

JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking


I prefer public analysis...........transparency is key.

I expect jet cash to examine the evidence provided in this thread and confirm

1. lauda is a liar.
2. Lauda will red trust you for presenting facts about this (even after he gets to call you a liar with no evidence many times)
3. Tman red trust abuse people ( as he stats in black and white for posting facts about it)

It is quite simple and there in black and white.

red trust is not there to stop people telling the truth it is there to allow people to tell the truth about wrong doing and untrustworthy behaviour.

I expect a full review

If jetcash refuses to do this after I have just told him  2 x and provided evidence on this thread then jetcash is also untrustworthy and complicit .  Or he is just a scared baby of lauda and his friends.

I want all my red trust removed else I will present the facts they should not be there. That is not blackmail that is reporting an abuse of the trust system. Got it.

@Harkorede

where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?



Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: stompix on January 17, 2019, 01:24:20 PM
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda :)]

Clearly, you're infected with cattus vulgaris.
But, although I've sent a lot of merit in meta, never saw that reference before.
Please don't tell me it was always there  :-[


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: The Cryptovator on January 17, 2019, 03:14:33 PM
Every one like Lauda because of it  ;)



Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 03:57:42 PM
Jetcash??

is mcdonalds wifi down again?  try burger king they are more reliable tp says.

I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.



Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 05:41:53 PM
Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: TMAN on January 17, 2019, 05:47:26 PM
Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

Man it’s all about the double sausage and egg McMuffin, unfortunately they don’t sell them where I am, many a time I have walked out the gym and started salivating about a maccies breakkie.

I was worried there when you started out, thought you were going to say that they banned you


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 05:49:38 PM
Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

Look at tman trying to get diverting with his superior mcdonalds knowledge. Gym hahaha


In other words Jetcash is  too scared to review the FACTS presented IN THIS THREAD that lauda lied.  Then lauda repeatedly called me a liar with no evidence and when I told him to stfu calling me that with no evidence or else I will encourage others to look into his history he red trusts me.

Well you need to be taken off of DT if you are scared to review my evidence because we need people with some courage.

I insist you review these facts POST HISTORY IN BLACK AND WHITE or be removed from DT.

If you think my evidence is anything like this mcdonalds nonsense you need to be removed from merit source because clearly you have a reading and comprehension issue.  

No read the facts and review them here in public.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 05:59:42 PM
I have reached a stage in my life when I don't do anything if I don't want to.

Right at this moment I'm more interested in deciding if I should start to use Grin or Beam. Grin seems to be better for everyday payments, but some people think Beam is better for asset transfers. I don't know enough to comment any further, and I prefer to investigate that rather than try to revive Lauda's history, which seems to have had considerable investigation by members who are more au fait with the situation than I am.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Lauda on January 17, 2019, 06:02:20 PM
Right at this moment I'm more interested in deciding if I should start to use Grin or Beam. Grin seems to be better for everyday payments, but some people think Beam is better for asset transfers.
Watch out which coin you choose, someone might dig it up 5 years later and claim you intentionally supported some scamcoin.  :D


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 06:06:08 PM

Watch out which coin you choose, someone might dig it up 5 years later and claim you intentionally supported some scamcoin.  :D

I'm hoping to dig up some 5 year old Bitcoin. I've even got a domain name for the search. :)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Lauda on January 17, 2019, 06:07:16 PM
Watch out which coin you choose, someone might dig it up 5 years later and claim you intentionally supported some scamcoin.  :D
I'm hoping to dig up some 5 year old Bitcoin. I've even got a domain name for the search. :)
You need to change your name to bitcoinhunter and it might work. Just watch out that you don't go crazy. :P


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 06:18:36 PM
I have reached a stage in my life when I don't do anything if I don't want to.

Right at this moment I'm more interested in deciding if I should start to use Grin or Beam. Grin seems to be better for everyday payments, but some people think Beam is better for asset transfers. I don't know enough to comment any further, and I prefer to investigate that rather than try to revive Lauda's history, which seems to have had considerable investigation by members who are more au fait with the situation than I am.

Excuses will not cut it.

There is no need to investigate. The evidence is on this thread.

You don't want to because you are too scared to give an objective review. This is the state of this board. People are scared to even view presented FACTS.

Remove jetcash from dt and merit source now. The guy is obviously terrified of giving a review of posted facts.

Lauda here too but is far to scared to debate with me also. I mean there is no debate he lied, called me a liar (brought no evidence) then red trust me for saying if he said that again I will encourage people to review his history where I know there are proven lies he has told in black and white because he told them to me personally.  

Now he is a proven liar + other filthy deeds giving me red trust for daring to say I will encourage people to look at his history if he does not fuck off calling me a liar with no evidence.

JETCASH DO YOUR JOB OR GET OFF DT AND MERIT SOURCE.






Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 06:36:07 PM

JETCASH DO YOUR JOB OR GET OFF DT AND MERIT SOURCE.


Two points.

I don't have a "job" here.

I don't think it is me who needs to get off the sauce. :)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 06:43:19 PM

JETCASH DO YOUR JOB OR GET OFF DT AND MERIT SOURCE.


Two points.

I don't have a "job" here.

I don't think it is me who needs to get off the sauce. :)

Stop being a pathetic coward. You have 2 links to read and you are scared to even review them. This demonstrates just how broken the forum is getting.

Review and tell me how lauda who you support for a trust position is not a liar.

You are responsible for your own actions. You are supporting someone untrustworthy (you can exclude him) into a position of trust. I mean you are not that thick you can't understand this are you.

I am explaining it to you as simply as i can.

Are you saying you willingly assist a proven liar on to DT1  ?? You know the T in DT is meant to stand for trust do you not?

You realise this makes you complicit and also a responsible for a liar being on DT even though I present you with the facts right?

So I would need to make sure these facts are known right? I mean it would be my responsibility to people to point them to this thread where you refuse to read the facts proving you are supporting and enabling a proven liar on DT1.

I mean if I did not make that known I would be complicit? wouldn't I?

I hope you can see the position we are both in. I am trying to help you help us.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 06:49:39 PM
>..<

How much do you want for the fiction rights for your posts?


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 06:50:20 PM
>..<

How much do you want for the fiction rights for your posts?

bigmac and large chocky shake?

post the fiction regarding this specific incident (no diverting)... I'll allow you to without royalties at this time...

review the evidence - admit he lied - exclude him on DT

next Tman the self confessed trust abuser but not on this thread to take it off topic


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 06:57:48 PM
I've put my domain name "Bitcoin Scammer" up for sale, and the link is in my sig. Maybe you would like to buy that, and take your issues up to the next level.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 07:02:52 PM
I've put my domain name "Bitcoin Scammer" up for sale, and the link is in my sig. Maybe you would like to buy that, and take your issues up to the next level.

I don't have issues. You do. You are supporting a liar willingly. Refusing to accept he is a liar when there is evidence in your own thread in black and white that he is.

Honestly if you can not see that you need to be taken off of DT and merit source.

Nothing personal i suspect you are just too scared to do the right thing. I don't blame you meta is riddled with total pussy cats. Meow.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 07:12:10 PM
Dammit - you've found me out, I am a pussy cat. What gave you the clue?


Maybe it was my avatar. :)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 07:31:32 PM
Dammit - you've found me out, I am a pussy cat. What gave you the clue?


Maybe it was my avatar. :)

I can sense that is " just leave me alone cryptohunter I don't want to get in any bust ups here"

Look I do not say you are that bad although you are an ass kisser to these bunch of scum bags. That is apparent.

However, you are a DT now and should be objective and review evidence of lies or scamming if provided for you in black and white concerning the very person you have made a thread about.

I mean you have no reason not to read 2 single posts that confirm lauda is a liar.

However, having said that I have just been told you are an older person and you seem quite civil so I will not apply more pressure at this time since it would seem a bit like bullying to me.  I am not a bully I simply want my red trust abuse removed and I reserve the rights to present facts that demonstrate I should have it removed where they are on topic.

For now I will not pressure you further to review the facts that I have presented. Perhaps you will do the right thing on your own time in the future.

Cool cat anyway.








Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 17, 2019, 07:41:02 PM
I've got a black belt in origami, so I'm not easy to bully.

I found this great page on the abagond blog - https://abagond.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/the-broken-record-department/

You may be provoking a movement to persuade Theymos to create such a board here.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 08:36:37 PM
I've got a black belt in origami, so I'm not easy to bully.

I found this great page on the abagond blog - https://abagond.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/the-broken-record-department/

You may be provoking a movement to persuade Theymos to create such a board here.

A fan of only fools and horses per chance?

Explain what you mean.

You object to people demonstrating facts to prove wrongdoing against them?

You say repeating facts to get justice is akin to a broken record.

Let me hear you explain it.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: jackg on January 17, 2019, 09:22:04 PM
I've got a black belt in origami, so I'm not easy to bully.

I found this great page on the abagond blog - https://abagond.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/the-broken-record-department/

You may be provoking a movement to persuade Theymos to create such a board here.

Meta will die if we do that.

Everyone here posting on meta will be the likes of.me looking for ways to improve the forum. It'll turn into being me, theymos and a few others who spot issues that can easily be fixed...

Everything from: "my account was banned", "please sir can I get the merit", "I'm.new here", "I know this should belong in reputation but at dt1 negged me so it's kinda forum related"...




You've been folding paper all this time ;D.




It'll be like ivory tower a few weeks ago when the first page contained 17 topics from jet Cash and 3 from me. 3 was excessive.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Harkorede on January 17, 2019, 09:34:14 PM
You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.


Is that really all you've got ? You're "legendary" ranked already, but literally all it seems is that you're just trying so hard to be relevant. Probably why you're so mad at everyone/everything about the forum. Keep trying, you'll still be irrelevant if you keep this bullshit up.


@Harkorede

where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?



I'll pass, I'd rather spend my time on some porn website and wank off to their best videos than get into an argument with a lost cause.
Let me draw your attention to something if you haven't noticed already, You arre actually getting lesser people respond to your posts by the day, sooner you'll only have your deluded self to argue with. Have a nice time, bye!


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 17, 2019, 10:07:10 PM
You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.


Is that really all you've got ? You're "legendary" ranked already, but literally all it seems is that you're just trying so hard to be relevant. Probably why you're so mad at everyone/everything about the forum. Keep trying, you'll still be irrelevant if you keep this bullshit up.


@Harkorede

where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?



I'll pass, I'd rather spend my time on some porn website and wank off to their best videos than get into an argument with a lost cause.
Let me draw your attention to something if you haven't noticed already, You arre actually getting lesser people respond to your posts by the day, sooner you'll only have your deluded self to argue with. Have a nice time, bye!

Let me draw you attention to something before you start enjoying yourself (can't blame you)

You said I am wrong about everything. I ask you to produce 1 thing. You produce nothing.

Let that sink in.

So you were talking shit. because to say I am wrong about everything you should have had at least one thing in mind to produce that claim.

Let that sink in.

Every single person on meta telling me I am wrong about everything.

I ask all of them to bring 1 thing.

They bring nothing.

They are talking shit.

Then they tell me I am lying.

I tell them bring me 1 lie I have said.

They bring me nothing.

They are lying.

Let that sink in.


I don't want to be known. I don't want the approval of any person here. I want fairness for every person as much as possible. I want justice. I want my red trust abuse removed.

Let that sink in.

When I said darkcoin was a scam, because they said fair launch and captive instamined it  themselves, then reduced the minting by 75% then made masternodes to take more coins from the miners.

Everyone said i was wrong it was a fair launch as they claimed and I should shut up.

I said show me how it was fair.

They did not. But they called me a nutcase and told me I should be banned for spreading shit. (sounds familiar)

Everyone said I was lying. LAUDA was  one of the main people claiming I was wrong and said he was there at the launch and there was no instamine. He lied. I remember him very well.

Then some other people did eventually listen ,they took note and looked into it.

Then they said hang on it is really was a scam.

Then lots of people analysed the entire thing deeply and discovered fuck it is a huge scam.

Then the dev evan said okay sorry it was a "big mistake" actually I will airdrop 2 million dash to the board for free all you have to do is vote and I will air drop it to those that were members at lauch time. I told people vote and you get 2 million dash airdropped to your dumb asses. Sadly the poll (not transparent) was terminated early and everyone missed out on a possible multi BILLION dollar air drop. Oh well I can lead the horse to the water but...

Now most people accept the distribution side of it was a scam. (not theymos who says it looks okay, that is his opinion I do not share his opinion at all. Although even theymos can not reverse time and say there was no premine and that it was a fair launch (like all the other projects that advertised fair launch and did fair launch at that time .) he can not reverse time and say lauda did not lie.

I had forgot about lauda and dash until this asshole kept coming to threads I was posting on and calling me a liar. then when I asked him to produce the lie he would not. he did it several times. Fuck him he is the proven liar and I will not accept red trust from that piece of shit.

Just the facts...

Enjoy your wank -









Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: jackg on January 18, 2019, 01:33:39 AM
@cryptohunter I'm still waiting for proof against lauda.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 18, 2019, 01:52:20 AM
@cryptohunter I'm still waiting for proof against lauda.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098591.0


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 18, 2019, 04:36:18 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Lauda on January 18, 2019, 04:38:09 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)
There is, it's just in another section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099172.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 18, 2019, 04:51:31 PM
>..<

Are you still the hot topic that has replaced nerits, or have we moved on to DT?

I'm tempted to run a book on the next one, but I can't work out the odds. The options seem to be

- Moderation
- TMAN
- Grin ( the outsider)
- Inadequate smileys ( I might try to kick start that one )
or is there something else in the wings Maybe lead membership - your posts sink to the bottom.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Lauda on January 18, 2019, 06:10:31 PM
>..<
Are you still the hot topic that has replaced nerits, or have we moved on to DT?
I need to stay ahead of this, the problem is that I've run out of legitimate reports and have nobody to tag ATM. :D

I'm tempted to run a book on the next one, but I can't work out the odds. The options seem to be
- TMAN
-snip-
Maybe in the Russian section.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 18, 2019, 06:37:59 PM
I need a new keyboard. I'm posting about nerits I see, are those negative merits?
And then there was the famous rape machine post. The problem is that the letters have worn off the keys, and for some reason I keep typing "r"s instead of "t"s.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: jackg on January 18, 2019, 06:46:30 PM
I need a new keyboard. I'm posting about nerits I see, are those negative merits?
And then there was the famous rape machine post. The problem is that the letters have worn off the keys, and for some reason I keep typing "r"s instead of "t"s.

Use the number pad I do that sometimes.
Using the altcodes I think that still works with Linux?


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 18, 2019, 06:50:27 PM
I'm on Windows 10 - the 2Tb SSD I bought is still sitting in its box. I decided that I needed to improve my social life, so I've slowed down with a few projects.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 18, 2019, 08:22:24 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)

Complain about drama

Wants more drama

Asked to provide a case as to why proven facts demonstrating there are  liars on dt is defined as drama

Merited by another person who dare not even review facts of proven lies and respond because is too scared.

LOL meta... got to love it.

Moglie where is that coward gone? Is he a proven liar now?

He said demonstrate evidence lauda lied and he will remove lauda from his list and add me.

I said forget adding me just remove him. I wonder if he did after I provided the evidence ........just ran away...........zoom.



Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: bones261 on January 18, 2019, 08:41:16 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)

Merited by another person who dare not even review facts of proven lies and respond because is too scared.




You know what ass wipe, It's abundantly clear that you don't understand anything about the effect of homophobia and racism. I responded to you by basically doxing myself in the open forum in the line of posts that your are referencing. You think that's chicken shit to reveal that you are gay and a brown person in this forum??!!!??? Why don't you go fuck the right off?


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 18, 2019, 08:53:27 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)

Merited by another person who dare not even review facts of proven lies and respond because is too scared.




You know what ass wipe, It's abundantly clear that you don't understand anything about the effect of homophobia and racism. I responded to you by basically doxing myself in the open forum in the line of posts that your are referencing. You think that's chicken shit to reveal that you are gay and a brown person in this forum??!!!??? Why don't you go fuck the right off?

Oh well let's not get paranoid. Why you should think that is something to worry about I have no idea. This is a sensible progressive forum the majority will not treat you any differently. This is the 2019 these qualities are not treated as negative by most civilised people.


However I stick by my statement you, moglie, jetcash and others are provided evidence of a lie and will not say

Okay yep that was a lie.

Seems strange.

If anything you should be fighting for a transparent and fairer system not railing against it.

Why are you getting upset that I am simply telling the truth. It makes zero sense.

Meta is a fucking weird but fun place. Nobody here seems to enjoy being truthful or wants to make things fair and creating a real meritocracy.

I mean present anything that I have said that makes you believe I am asking for anything but that.







Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: bones261 on January 18, 2019, 09:21:18 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)

Merited by another person who dare not even review facts of proven lies and respond because is too scared.




You know what ass wipe, It's abundantly clear that you don't understand anything about the effect of homophobia and racism. I responded to you by basically doxing myself in the open forum in the line of posts that your are referencing. You think that's chicken shit to reveal that you are gay and a brown person in this forum??!!!??? Why don't you go fuck the right off?

Oh well let's not get paranoid. Why you should think that is something to worry about I have no idea. This is a sensible progressive forum the majority will not treat you any differently. This is the 2019 these qualities are not treated as negative by most civilised people.



   Well, It may be a better environment than in the 80's, but apparently you have no clue what the gay experience is like, even in this day. Sorry, I'm not buying it when you put on airs that you are some kind of SJW. By the way, I thinks it was funny as hell for a white guy (I think he's white) to portray a black woman in the most absurd manner possible. If I was a merit source at the time, I probably would have poured out the merits. Things that make me chuckle get merit from me. Sorry that doesn't meet your high standards of what deserves merit.

For reference of a white guy playing a black guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5XEdw1eRc4 (Maybe not as extreme as the Huge Black Woman example, but definitely not what I would consider a pristine portrayal a woman, either. In fact, few of the portrayals of women on that show are flattering to woman. Does that make me a misogynistic pig because I find it amusing? Probably. Oh the fuck well.)


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 18, 2019, 09:35:00 PM
I thought I would bump this thread, as there isn't enough drama on Meta these days. :)

Merited by another person who dare not even review facts of proven lies and respond because is too scared.




You know what ass wipe, It's abundantly clear that you don't understand anything about the effect of homophobia and racism. I responded to you by basically doxing myself in the open forum in the line of posts that your are referencing. You think that's chicken shit to reveal that you are gay and a brown person in this forum??!!!??? Why don't you go fuck the right off?

Oh well let's not get paranoid. Why you should think that is something to worry about I have no idea. This is a sensible progressive forum the majority will not treat you any differently. This is the 2019 these qualities are not treated as negative by most civilised people.



   Well, It may be a better environment than in the 80's, but apparently you have no clue what the gay experience is like, even in this day. Sorry, I'm not buying it when you put on airs that you are some kind of SJW. By the way, I thinks it was funny as hell for a white guy (I think he's white) to portray a black woman in the most absurd manner possible. If I was a merit source at the time, I probably would have poured out the merits. Things that make me chuckle get merit from me. Sorry that doesn't meet your high standards of what deserves merit.

For reference of a white guy playing a black guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5XEdw1eRc4 (Maybe not as extreme as the Huge Black Woman example, but definitely not what I would consider a pristine portrayal a woman, either. In fact, few of the portrayals of women on that show are flattering to woman. Does that make me a misogynistic pig because I find it amusing? Probably. Oh the fuck well.)


You dont have to buy it you have to prove that anything i have said does not demonstrate that I am. That is how it works. You need to provide a case for your opinion or it is just groundless.

Your views of racist trolling to sig spam for bucks may not be the view of all. It obviously is not judging by that thread people are genuinely upset and offended.

That does not change the fact that apparently you had the courage to dox yourself but the not the courage to review proof of a lie and say it was a lie.

Now if you like people racist trolling for sig spam bucks that is your view I am not going to argue about that.  That is your view.
But don't apply double standards to other peoples posts.

Never complain about trolling, or people spamming with puppet accounts for more btc dust.

Also you still did not answer the the most important question.

You are all terrified of something.





Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: bones261 on January 18, 2019, 09:52:41 PM
You are all terrified of something.

Terrified? Not really. Irritated. (at you) Definitely.





Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: cryptohunter on January 19, 2019, 01:29:19 PM
You are all terrified of something.

Terrified? Not really. Irritated. (at you) Definitely.





irritated because I am pointing out clearly that you are afraid to review observable facts that prove lauda lied and give your opinion.

Sorry you're irritated but you should be ashamed. Simple as that.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: bones261 on January 19, 2019, 02:07:34 PM
You are all terrified of something.

Terrified? Not really. Irritated. (at you) Definitely.





irritated because I am pointing out clearly that you are afraid to review observable facts that prove lauda lied and give your opinion.

Sorry you're irritated but you should be ashamed. Simple as that.

Which matter in particular? The one where Lauda was accused of mishandling escrow funds or the misguided attempt to ensnare who she thought was the bitfinex hacker? Meh, whatever.


Title: Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)
Post by: Jet Cash on January 19, 2019, 04:26:35 PM
We need to appoint someone to be Charon ( the ferryman ) for these threads. :)