|
Title: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 09:39:49 AM Theymos introduced Trust flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.0), which can be created by anyone (conditions apply!), but need support from at least 1 or 3 DT-members.
It looks like this: https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/16/Rrp5T.png https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/16/RrbEo.png How Before creating a flag, please create a topic in Scam Accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) to use as Reference link. It can't be self-moderated, and it can't be locked. I've seen many Flags that point to a generic topic, which makes it much more work to check the evidence. Stick to the facts, and keep it as short as possible without leaving things out. If your Flag doesn't have enough support, feel free to post it here. To anyone: please check the reference topic before deciding to Support or Oppose the flag. When in doubt, don't do anything. Identify Flag types type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37 type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9 type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35 Trust Flag viewer See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0) for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?C=M;O=D directly for the data. There's a very convenient "BBCode for Bitcointalk" link on top of the page, use the most recent one to post the Flag here. You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.0). No spam Self moderated to stop spam. Don't go off-topic. Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). If this topic proves useful, I'll make a nicer OP. If not, I'll lock it. Title: Re: Request Flag support here! Post by: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 09:40:44 AM I'll be the first:
I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags Flags Flag on BetKing.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41) Flag on BetKing Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=42) Flag on PocketRocketsCasino (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=43) Flag on dean nolan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=44) Title: Re: Request Flag support here! Post by: Lafu on June 12, 2019, 11:18:26 AM I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags Done for all 4 Accounts and supported. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: NeuroticFish on June 12, 2019, 11:47:45 AM I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"... Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct? Correct. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 11:53:04 AM I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid. It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153493.msg51440061#msg51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag. I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"... Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 11:58:48 AM I don't want to be the party stopper That's the part under "conditions apply". It has some strong limitations, but I assume theymos created those to restrict the use of Flags. It makes red trust a bit less strong, and the stronger Flag shouldn't be used for everything.Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47. In between all his red trust, he Repaid another 0.2 BTC no collateral loan (https://archive.is/QpPid#selection-429.0-429.44). Therefore, I can't Support this Flag (but I won't Oppose it either).Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: NeuroticFish on June 12, 2019, 11:59:07 AM I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid. It's just dumb.I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"... It's not me who you have to argue with. I wrote from start that "I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules)". What I meant was exactly that under certain limits/rules some others should be able to also add flags. I added the "rule" into discussion for 2 reasons: 1. Avoid (for now!) doing work that could be invalidated. 2. Discuss (with Theymos?) for better rules. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 12:02:52 PM Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=49https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=50 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=51 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Quickseller on June 12, 2019, 01:12:14 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1046791.0
All of the people linked in the above thread. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on June 12, 2019, 03:38:10 PM TradeFortress flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58
I have created a flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58 I planned on creating a new scam accusation but I found an open topic that had my quote in the OP, which I have used as a reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=326879.0 Here is a post from my previously hacked account (couldn't quote it since it was posted in a locked thread): https://i.imgur.com/Y50j5ye.png That address leads to the inputs.io wallet, proving that I actually had funds stored there/lost money: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Inputs.io?from_address=1LH3aGsw5BzhPwbSANgfCnUXoS7XkK8fQM I cannot recall the exact amount I had stored there. I contacted TF about a refund but I have never received a reply. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on June 12, 2019, 05:36:57 PM How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen Sorry i have been away for some hours and I am just still learning about the new development. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 05:39:15 PM How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case? Assuming you haven't been scammed, you can use the Newbie warning Flag for those:Quote Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: TryNinja on June 12, 2019, 05:40:07 PM How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case? If I understood correctly, you can only give him the first type of flag "Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money" - which is only shown to guests/newbies.Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen The other 2 cases are only valid if you are a victim of OP (scammed, deceived, etc). If he "violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages" or "violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages". Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: otrkid1970 on June 12, 2019, 06:00:00 PM I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid. It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153493.msg51440061#msg51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag. I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"... Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47. You failed. The list of opposers will grow Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 11:25:57 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=64
It's reasonable to say that users dealing with him would be at risk, at the very least. If this one isn't within the guidelines, nothing is. ::) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on June 12, 2019, 11:32:24 PM When you have time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153703.0
ToC will be updated as flags increase. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on June 13, 2019, 06:58:19 AM Flag for user nitrat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1017787). He seems not just a bounty manager but directly involved with the project team.
Tagged and flagged. If you agree then please support : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=74 Thank you. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on June 13, 2019, 12:59:34 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=80 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=81 PSA: don't forget to flag known alts of any shitbird you're flagging... remember, previously red-trusted accounts look very different now. It used to be enough to label a scammer (and alts) with one or two red trust ratings, but now such accounts my look like this: +6 / =0 / -1 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Last of the V8s on June 13, 2019, 05:36:28 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=77 r0ach
I wouldn't advise anyone to trade with him, let alone a newbie. Thank you. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 14, 2019, 11:20:29 AM Please support my flag for Kriptonian1661
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=105 His post in thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5154206.0 Hi lads, Coming back again to promote my services. As i mentioned 1 Month ago i am the one who put Bitcoins name on Youtube Streams :Bloomberg Global News, Fox news and to continue. Basicaly every popular stream was marked with the name Bitcoin and as you searched Bitcoin the first thing that poped up was Bloomberg Global news, i am not going to provide any proof as it might endanger my career. The actions it self are my proof and you will have to trust me that i have a new technique to do it again and put BTC over the 20k Mark, but as i did it for free in the past i sure as hell am not doing it for free again !! So i am asking 50 BTC for my endevour and 1 year of time to make it all work properly so it all sinks in to the minds of consumers. This is not a scam, i simply want to be paid for my Idea, i will not do it for free ! So dont start saying oohh dude do your self a favor and pump BTC, what do i have from that? Sure i could sell BTC at a higher price but so would everyone else.. ppfftt not for free lads not for free. So here is my awful grammar but i do not care as English is not my Native language so you will have to deal with that. Anyway, my idea and endevour is worth 50 BTC, that is the price take it or leave it. Just remember you have to risk it to get the biscuit ! I will not reveal my identity or anything regarding to my plan, again you will have to deal with that. 1GZR3SFzXrc3gd2M74ga4P18CxvfEboeNG Once i see 50 BTC in my Wallet i will start my Project Troy. Kind regards Cryptonians. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: yogg on June 14, 2019, 11:22:20 AM Please support my flag for Kriptonian1661 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=105 Supported. Thanks for flagging that scammer. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 14, 2019, 11:25:58 AM Please support my flag for Kriptonian1661 I don't think this needs a flag. Anyone dumb enough to send 50 Bitcoin to a begger can't be saved. I've just reported the post.I think it's better to reserve Flags for when it's really needed. Besides, trust and flags aren't shown on that board anyway. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: witcher_sense on June 15, 2019, 10:50:54 AM I request support for the bunch of flags here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143166.0
Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bitmover on June 16, 2019, 02:08:14 AM Please support my flag here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=211 I talked to admins, and they said they will pay me if I remove the feedback lol ofc i said the opposite: pay me and I will remove the flag. This flag system works!! lol Edit: no payment so far. I doubt, as it is s known scam as many people already said. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bones261 on June 16, 2019, 02:15:31 AM Please support my flag here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=211 I talked to admins, and they said they will pay me if I remove the feedback lol ofc i said the opposite: pay me and I will remove the flag. This flag system works!! lol Well, let us know if they make you whole. If you forgive them, I'll have to remove my support from the red tag. Then I'll create a yellow tag since it's clear that they are trying to dupe people to get 90 bucks out of them for 18 bucks. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: marlboroza on June 16, 2019, 10:54:39 AM Supporting. This is this the same scam as these scams https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081286.0 so you can also report them to moderator for spamming their scams, they will nuke account.
If anyone wants to support this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=83... Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: marlboroza on June 21, 2019, 10:41:59 AM Edited link ::) Edit 2 Thread is removed, no evidences left so no one should support this flag. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: mikeywith on June 21, 2019, 09:57:18 PM Quote The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you. The newbie has 0 posts Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: marlboroza on June 21, 2019, 10:31:32 PM Quote The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you. The newbie has 0 posts now as of now ( obviously that post was deleted due to spam / off-topic ) so what happens now? you can't edit the flag ! wait for him to make another scam attempt and get someone else to flag him ? the new system is a bit messed up. Of course, I forget to archive thread so I can't really create new flag and I can't delete this one, well, what I can do is to remove "my support" from this flag because I can't support something which is not there ::) and I will also edit again my post above. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 22, 2019, 06:07:21 AM The newbie has 0 posts I've seen many flags use the scammer's thread as a reference, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to make a new topic on the scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) board, and use that to create a flag.Meanwhile, doge-games (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2624567) created a new topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157148.0) (I didn't check his website). Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: marlboroza on June 22, 2019, 02:23:25 PM I've seen many flags use the scammer's thread as a reference, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to make a new topic on the scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) board, and use that to create a flag. I did and this happened:https://i.imgur.com/BUqmLpW.png I have to recheck rules about flag thingy I probably missed few, but if anyone wants to create flag type 1 to warn newbies please do, here is thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157280.0 for reference. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on June 22, 2019, 03:19:28 PM I've seen many flags use the scammer's thread as a reference, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to make a new topic on the scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) board, and use that to create a flag. I did and this happened:https://i.imgur.com/BUqmLpW.png I have to recheck rules about flag thingy I probably missed few, but if anyone wants to create flag type 1 to warn newbies please do, here is thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157280.0 for reference. Made a new flag :) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 23, 2019, 10:13:50 AM Can I get flag support - whocoincrypto - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=259
Not discovered by me but here’s the evidence - What happened: Whocoins wallet is infected with a ransomware, website is created using wordpress.com Scammer's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2633179 ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157425.0 (archived) - http://archive.fo/W4KZS Website: https://whocoincrypto1.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/welcome/ - [Archived (http://web.archive.org/web/20190623032147/https://whocoincrypto1.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/welcome/)] Scammer also had an article about his scam on one of the blogs - https://coinhub.news/cs/article/bitcointalk-ann-who-whocoin-a-new-tor-based-anonymous-cryptocoin-using-new-cryptography 5 Antivirus Engines Positively detected that the wallet is malicious Virus Total results: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/22e4eabd8b8afd31ab692eccf7fc0d4da79ddbaa5b01afd1cefc112d6c6c18a5/detection https://i.imgur.com/DqK5j9i.png https://i.imgur.com/rIYUwuk.png Reports from users also show that the wallet asks for 3 Monero after locking the files 1. do not download it is virus!!!! it will lock all your files and ask 3 XMR what a fukcing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2. good thing i put this crap in a VM; looks just like that spritecoin crap I got last year and just a reminder: DONT RUN THIS ITS RANSOMWARE AND THEY WANT 3 MONERO Additional Notes: DO NOT DOWNLOAD THE WALLET AND RUN IT ON YOUR WINDOWS PC Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on June 23, 2019, 12:09:48 PM Can I get flag support - whocoincrypto - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=259 You got my support.I've seen many flags use the scammer's thread as a reference, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to make a new topic on the scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) board, and use that to create a flag. I did and this happened:https://i.ibb.co/0DM7JNM/51571968.png I have to recheck rules about flag thingy I probably missed few, but if anyone wants to create flag type 1 to warn newbies please do, here is thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157280.0 for reference. Made a new flag :) And you too 🤪 It's fascinating how these people use their creativity to cheat others. If they were using this creativity in a good way then the community and them too would get long term benefit. People are too greedy these days and always chose shortcut to take advantages from others. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 02:43:28 PM Here's a Newbie (account created in 2011) claiming to have a billion dollars worth of bitcoin for sale, and requiring KYC to deal. All of this in a locked thread. Obviously just an attempt to steal someone's identification documents.
Username: andy3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31289) Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31289 Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3395124.msg35551192#msg35551192 Archive: http://archive.fo/JEKBM Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=263 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 23, 2019, 03:01:11 PM Here's a Newbie (account created in 2011) claiming to have a billion dollars worth of bitcoin for sale, and requiring KYC to deal. All of this in a locked thread. Obviously just an attempt to steal someone's identification documents. Username: andy3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31289) Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31289 Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3395124.msg35551192#msg35551192 Archive: http://archive.fo/JEKBM Flag: ETA: I can't create a type 1 flag for this user, anyone know why? I don’t know what you mean? Do you mean you can’t start a newbie/guest flag? If so that’s weird, do you want me to try? Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 03:10:57 PM I don’t know what you mean? Do you mean you can’t start a newbie/guest flag? If so that’s weird, do you want me to try? Correct. I get sent to a page that says "That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked." Could you try, please? Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 03:14:28 PM All of this in a locked thread. Correct. I get sent to a page that says "That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked." That's the reason right there. You're supposed to create a non-self-mod unlocked thread for a flag. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 23, 2019, 03:19:49 PM Same here - That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked.
Can you just create a flag & put the link as your post here which will then give the link to the scammy thread & act as evidence? I would still support it. Use this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg51573663#msg51573663 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 03:38:50 PM I tried using the post that I created (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg51573663#msg51573663) as the reference link, and I get the same error. I then thought maybe it needed to be a topic link, so I used the link to this topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.0) and still the same error. I haven't run into that trouble before, it's the weirdest thing.
ETA: I just noticed this is a self moderated topic. DOH! I'll try staking my post in Lafu's thread and link to that. ETA again: That worked, but something odd still happend. I used the link to my post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153534.msg51574458#msg51574458) as the reference link, but the flag trimmed the link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153534.0) to point to the topic it'self. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 04:44:06 PM ETA again: That worked, but something odd still happend. I used the link to my post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153534.msg51574458#msg51574458) as the reference link, but the flag trimmed the link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153534.0) to point to the topic it'self. Yes, it does that. I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond. Quote Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that [...] Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 23, 2019, 05:07:05 PM I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond. That was my understanding too, but many Flags link to threads created by someone else. Maybe it shouldn't be possible at all to create a Flag based on a thread that someone else created.Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 05:21:46 PM I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond. That was my understanding too, but many Flags link to threads created by someone else. Maybe it shouldn't be possible at all to create a Flag based on a thread that someone else created.That might be an overkill. What if someone creates a thread researching a scam and then a victim wants to create a red box for it. I think we should just use common sense and use reliable links (preferably not the scam threads themselves as the perp could then edit/remove it), and archive them just in case. That was the preferred MO in the "old" system too. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 06:00:30 PM I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond. That actually makes perfect sense. Imagine the kvetching that would ensue if the perp couldn't respond to his accusation. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Blacknavy on June 26, 2019, 08:32:25 PM [FLAG] Mindrust [DT1] member gave me redtrust without reason (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158894.0)
He obsessed with me because we had couple arguments in past. Here's his slander (https://i.imgur.com/Tweta8B.png) I've never encouraged merit farming/trading in my life. I use this forum properly and never cross the general rules. He became a DT member just a 2-3 weeks ago and appearently he doesn't even know how to use his power. Quote Ortada hiçbir kanıt yok çünkü seçime katılan hiçbir üye o bahsettiğin grupta değil. Quote There is no evidence because none of the members in the election (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153279.0) is in 'that merit trading group' This was fully what i wrote. I do not know what to say because Mindrust is obviously crossing my words and trying to change the meaning. I believe that DT members will oppose this. It's not fair someone to crop only one part of my sentences and giving me red trust. I hope someone will fix this. FLAG #295 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=295) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: vlom on July 03, 2019, 06:41:34 PM ty
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894070 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on July 05, 2019, 11:15:54 AM How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet?
User profile - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254 He ponces around the forum pretending to be able to help people who have been scammed by casinos etc. I mean look at this shit - Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed! He’s been doing it for years. Look at his post history - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254;sa=showPosts I was tempted to create an alt & try to see if he charges for his bull shit service by contacting him, pretending to be an aggrieved gambler. I’m pretty sure this guy has potential to be a scammer but I have no solid evidence. I feel a flag to warn noobs/guests COULD be beneficial. What do you think guys? Edit - I’ve created a flag. Please support it - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372 This guy has so many negative trust feedbacks. I simply do not tryst the fact that he is qualified to or has any means of legally enforcing lawsuits/cases against gambling companies. He is getting people to contact him privately which I believe could be for financial gain with absolutely no guarantee or promise to ever get peoples money back. It you look at the post history it seems he’s getting desperate in recent days bumping lots of threads with the same C&P’d posts touting his likely faux business. Please help & support my flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on July 06, 2019, 11:33:35 AM Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above :)
Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 11:49:05 AM Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above :) I would like to support it but your reference link is not good. You should have pointed it to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1535816 (game-protect thread) or create a new thread with what you posted above... Keep in mind that flag reference links get truncated to the top of the thread so it doesn't work well if you're trying to link to a post somewhere deep in a thread. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on July 06, 2019, 03:34:05 PM Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above :) I would like to support it but your reference link is not good. You should have pointed it to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1535816 (game-protect thread) or create a new thread with what you posted above... Keep in mind that flag reference links get truncated to the top of the thread so it doesn't work well if you're trying to link to a post somewhere deep in a thread. It seems I can’t create a new flag with the link you provided (a better link) for another 180 days as I’ve already done one. Somebody else will have to do it or hopefully others support the current one. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: marlboroza on July 09, 2019, 07:55:08 PM How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet? It wasn't necessary to flag them as they had big red box on top of their thread because of old trust system.I can only say that there isn't any proof that their service helped anyone, however, there is no proof that they didn't but many things in their thread, site and behavior raised many red flags and I personally would not trust them. I mean look at this shit - And there is no proof that lawyer did or didn't approached them and knowing GP they won't say anything except this. Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed! It seems I can’t create a new flag with the link you provided (a better link) for another 180 days as I’ve already done one. Somebody else will have to do it or hopefully others support the current one. I would not suggest anyone to support this flag because it will be abuse of system - as suchmoon said, link is not good. Give me a few minutes, I will create new one.Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: morvillz7z on July 09, 2019, 09:51:48 PM If anyone wants to support a flag type 1 against ICOHolder, here's your chance:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=437 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1206615 They have a long and very bad reputation of verifying incorrect information about team members for various ICO projects thus misleading potential investors. They would verify stock images, cartoons and whatnot as long as they are being paid. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: game-protect on July 11, 2019, 12:31:50 PM A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea. :)
Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on July 11, 2019, 12:34:25 PM A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea. :) Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it.By the way, this is not looking good I am afraid - 🔴🔴🔴SCAM🔴🔴🔴GAME-PROTECT.COM🔴🔴🔴SCAM🔴🔴🔴 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116037.0) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: game-protect on July 12, 2019, 12:28:25 AM A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea. :) Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it.Believing means not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer! Not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer confirms that Game Protect is not a scammer. The more users believe = confirm that I am not a scammer, the higher is the trust rating and I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk :) The correct versions are: Quote Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them Quote Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they know / have proof that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: TECSHARE on July 12, 2019, 02:02:43 AM A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea. :) Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it.Believing means not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer! Not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer confirms that Game Protect is not a scammer. The more users believe = confirm that I am not a scammer, the higher is the trust rating and I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk :) The correct versions are: Quote Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them Quote Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they know / have proof that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. The trust system was created to help prevent fraud and abuse, not so that racketeers can use it as a veneer of endorsement of the forum to cover up for their lack of credibility. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on July 12, 2019, 02:58:53 AM -snip- https://i.imgur.com/uzr5eQ4.pngI am not a scammer and I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk :) If I don't know you're a scammer, then yes... in my reality, you're not a scammer. But we do. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bones261 on July 13, 2019, 01:21:35 AM Please support my flag against user BTCGamblePro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2567991). He is promoting a web application that claims to give a foolproof way of winning. When I decided to take him up on his offer for a free 1 week trial, I discovered the terms of service that I had to agree to is non-existent as well as the privacy policy. The yellow flag may be redundant since he already has red banner displayed due to previous negative trust feedback. However, I found the hyperlinks for "terms of service" and "privacy policy" that lead to nowhere particularly irritating.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=447 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on July 13, 2019, 07:46:49 AM Flag created https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=448 If you expect support for your flag, it's much more helpful if you create a thread in Scam Accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0), instead of linking to a sales thread filled with insubstantial posts. Collect evidence, use the proper reporting format, and make it easy for users to understand what it's all about. Here's an example (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5122856.0) of a format that received a lot of Flag-support.Check evidence and support if you agree with me so newbies wont get scammed. ~snip~ Please don't do this in my topic:Code: [size=90pt][color=red]WARNING!!!! THIS USER SCAMPER !!!![/color] [/size] Hey scammer, I've updated the OP, and deleted your post. This is not the place to fight your battles:~snip~ No spam Self moderated to stop spam. Don't go off-topic. Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on July 13, 2019, 06:38:53 PM trade-sa-to-shi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=444 (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=902367)
1xBit.com: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=446 (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910922) bitcoiin2gen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=443 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on July 13, 2019, 06:44:36 PM trade-sa-to-shi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=902367;page=aflags (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=902367) Can you fix the links? Now the links only work for users who see the flags as "active".1xBit.com: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910922;page=aflags (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910922) bitcoiin2gen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1854047;page=aflags Example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=444 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on July 13, 2019, 09:29:16 PM trade-sa-to-shi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=902367;page=aflags (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=902367) Can you fix the links? Now the links only work for users who see the flags as "active".1xBit.com: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910922;page=aflags (details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910922) bitcoiin2gen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1854047;page=aflags Example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=444 Fair point and fixed. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Initscri on July 16, 2019, 07:37:38 AM How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet? User profile - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254 He ponces around the forum pretending to be able to help people who have been scammed by casinos etc. I mean look at this shit - Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed! He’s been doing it for years. Look at his post history - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254;sa=showPosts I was tempted to create an alt & try to see if he charges for his bull shit service by contacting him, pretending to be an aggrieved gambler. I’m pretty sure this guy has potential to be a scammer but I have no solid evidence. I feel a flag to warn noobs/guests COULD be beneficial. What do you think guys? Edit - I’ve created a flag. Please support it - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372 This guy has so many negative trust feedbacks. I simply do not tryst the fact that he is qualified to or has any means of legally enforcing lawsuits/cases against gambling companies. He is getting people to contact him privately which I believe could be for financial gain with absolutely no guarantee or promise to ever get peoples money back. It you look at the post history it seems he’s getting desperate in recent days bumping lots of threads with the same C&P’d posts touting his likely faux business. Please help & support my flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372 Forgot to respond to this. He does charge a 5% up-front "donation" fee (which I assume is non-returnable due to his use of the word "donation") You can go through his post history. I had a nice little talk w/ him about it before. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bob123 on July 19, 2019, 08:45:44 AM Requesting support for the type 1 flag against Livecoin Manager (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2650265), which is a new account created because of the red trust and flag against Livecoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=462136).
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=475 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=475) Reference topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166754.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166754.0) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on July 20, 2019, 07:30:27 AM Please support this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=477
I am posting it in here on behalf of the victim since his experience in this forum is very limited. He requires assistance in every steps. For a newbie this flag thing is too much to do. Accusation conversation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166605.0 Requesting support for the type 1 flag against Livecoin Manager (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2650265), which is a new account created because of the red trust and flag against Livecoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=462136). I got the support.Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=475 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=475) Reference topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166754.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166754.0) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bones261 on July 20, 2019, 02:36:15 PM Hello, I need some advise on flags. I flagged the below account for offering a pyramid scheme. I used the member's thread as reference for the flag. I had figured that if I quote the op and flag it, that would be sufficient to support the flag.(I quoted it so the OP would not be able to modify his post and get rid of the evidence.)
However, another member just pointed out that the scammer is breaking the rules. So the thread is likely to get deleted... Am I really going to have to open up a scam accusation thread and every petty offense that I come across? In the mean time, so that I stay on topic, please support my flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=474 👍 All transactions go via an ETH smart contract and the funds does not fall in the wallets of the owners of this project, we just transact funds from the downline person to the upperline, this is the beauty of this project. Quoted and flagged. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=474) This is obviously a pyramid scheme/ponzi. Please click on the link to support my flag.💎 https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351 (https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351) to join this project you need only 0.055 ETH (about $10, 0.05 + 0.005 for GAS), this is the maximum amount you can lose in this project) 💥 You need to invite only 3 people at your link, your people will transact 0.05 ETH to you each, after you buy levels from higher level people, in order to earn even more, the second level costs 0.15 ETH, but further more interesting and the profit will be much more 💯💥 You can also build your downline referrals - their downlines, in order to earn more, or just wait, but it will take more time❗ THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE EARNING ABOUT 10,000 ETH, though real earning will likely to be much lower, BUT STILL, you can earn a few ETH! 💰💰💰 And this is all for an investment of only 0.05 ETH❗ Also your upline will help you to build you own structure 👍 💎 Go to the site https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351 (https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351) choose the language and click Registration above, you just need to make a transaction of 0.05 ETH via Metamask. Or click Manual and you can do it via https://www.myetherwallet.com/, but there you need to manually send the transaction and when making the transaction in the Advanced settings add the ETH wallet 0x9e6E68ac9d6a1E69950b75a9d06EE335CC0Ba2d8 in the Add Data field and transfer 0.05 ETH and the system will automatically put you in the right place. This is all you need to do to register in the project❗ By registering with my referral, you will receive many referrals, I will actively promote this project, I really liked it and I think everyone can make good money in this project. Join and start earning with our community, and, certainly, bringing your people is very welcome, let's succeed together 👍 Cryptohands is already at the 11th place on https://dappradar.com/rankings/protocol/ethereum (https://dappradar.com/rankings/protocol/ethereum)! P.S. If it writes that you came without a referral link, you can add this ETH address in the field 0x9e6E68ac9d6a1E69950b75a9d06EE335CC0Ba2d8 and all will be ok 👍 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=474 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on July 20, 2019, 02:47:28 PM However, another member just pointed out that the scammer is breaking the rules. So the thread is likely to get deleted... Am I really going to have to open up a scam accusation thread and every petty offense that I come across? I prefer creating my own thread and this way chances of altering the topic/post contents are less.💎 Go to the site https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351 (https://cryptohands.org/?rid=2351) The user used referral link so most likely the topic will be deleted if anyone report it.Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: teeGUMES on July 20, 2019, 05:43:15 PM Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=481)
User (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2326516) Topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1691388.0) While watching the Livecoin campaign disaster go down I looked into some of the other exchanges others were mentioning as also having shady ToS/business structure which led me to the tradesatoshi exchange topic. The user zyrenth appears to be high up at tradesatoshi and was last active ~12 hours from this post. This user was singled out in the OP of the thread linked which is what led me to look at their profile. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: roycilik on August 02, 2019, 06:09:13 AM Need support
shasan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1883627) has created a flag for Apriand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669062) (Load default) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=539 Referenced: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137126.0 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on August 02, 2019, 09:46:30 AM Need support FTFY.shasan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1883627) has created a flag for Apriand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669062) (Loan default) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=539 Referenced: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137126.0 The flag has been supported and also I left a negative feedback for the user. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: shasan on August 02, 2019, 11:30:45 AM Need support:
Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=546) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140184.0 Reason: Loan defualted. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Vispilio on August 02, 2019, 09:20:24 PM Multi accounts of the same person or gang, conducting sophisticated scams on the Turkish forums throughout the years (typically by alt accounts escrowing for each other then running away with the money), recently waking up from inactivity after 2 years, be careful he is hungry again:
gablay12: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=381608 flag against gablay12: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=550 pisquare: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=819232 flag against pisquare: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=551 These 2 guys (possibly the same person with multiple personality disorder) and their various alt accounts immediately started retaliatory tactics against honest members of the Turkish forum who correctly tagged them after their scam circle became suddenly active again, comprehensive thread about their misdeeds and criminal activities evidenced here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171678.msg52040939#msg52040939 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: shasan on August 03, 2019, 10:00:25 PM Need support:
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=555 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171966 Reason: Collateral Scammer. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: Csmiami on August 03, 2019, 10:15:47 PM Requesting some love on these 2 type 1 flags:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=557 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=557) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=558 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=558) Reason: likely scammers/loan defaulters. Reference will go to a thread I've just created here that I intend to use for only Lending board flags Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: shasan on August 03, 2019, 10:18:30 PM Need support: USER: Razerglass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360915)
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171995 Reason: Loan Defaulted. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on August 07, 2019, 01:13:55 PM Kindly support my flag against the manager of ANYONE project Is this flag type2 or 3? And are you one of direct victim? I supported the flag but I needed to have the answer also.Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=592 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171602.0 Reason: Accomplice of refusal to pay signature participants. Cheers :-) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 07, 2019, 01:22:25 PM Is this flag type2 or 3? It says "violated a written contract, resulting in damages", which means type 3.Quote And are you one of direct victim? Based on this, I think he is a victim:Link: http://archive.is/BOyIK Users paid are marked blue. Sorry, I don't have time to evaluate all evidence myself now, so I can't support it yet. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on August 07, 2019, 01:26:17 PM It says "violated a written contract, resulting in damages", which means type 3. I always find it hard to identify a type 2 and type 3 flag.By the way, thanks for the reference. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 07, 2019, 01:41:49 PM I always find it hard to identify a type 2 and type 3 flag. It took me a while too, I had to identify them for my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0). Normally I would refer you to my site (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?MD) for the exact type of each flag, but it's still uploading data (currently 75% to go).I took these notes on 3 flags which can be withdrawn: type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37 type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9 type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35 I'll add this overview to the OP. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on August 07, 2019, 01:52:49 PM I took these notes on 3 flags which can be withdrawn: Quoting for visibility in the post history.type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37 type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9 type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35 I'll add this overview to the OP. Thanks very much bud. Now I got what I needed. The 2nd one is caual or implied agreement and the 3rd one is a written contract. This is what I was missing this small detail. Thanks again. Cheers :-) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 11, 2019, 10:59:54 PM Is there a way to change from a "type 1" to a "type 2" flag? Or have both especially if both are true?
Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on August 11, 2019, 11:43:58 PM Is there a way to change from a "type 1" to a "type 2" flag? Or have both especially if both are true? You can not change one type to another. And I think you can create two types of flag if you want to but not the same (I have a little doubt) Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 12, 2019, 06:26:48 AM And I think you can create two types of flag if you want to but not the same Correct:These limits are in place: - Per 180 days, you can only give 1 flag of each type to a given user. So you can't give someone multiple written-contract-violation flags in 180 days, for example. - Globally, per year you can only create 1 flag per activity point you have, but at least 1/year. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 12, 2019, 06:34:42 PM Well, I added the second (type 2) flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=621 but it is only showing the original "type 1" flag. I then tried to enter it again and it said the flag was added, but it's not.
Maybe because it needs support? Or maybe only 1 flag is permitted at a time? Or maybe due to this: sandy-is-fine alleges: Axez D. Nyde violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Axez D. Nyde did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around August 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 12, 2019, 06:38:35 PM Well, I added the second (type 2) flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=621 but it is only showing the original "type 1" flag. Type 2 (or 3) need Support from at least 3 DT-members to be Active.You can find the flag here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=37197): Quote Inactive flags This user has inactive flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=37197;page=iflags), which may be totally inaccurate. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 12, 2019, 06:40:03 PM AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help? :D
Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: bones261 on August 12, 2019, 06:47:48 PM AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help? :D I went ahead and supported your red flag. I certainly hope that some members of this forum don't decide to give you flack, since you deliberately made a deal with this person so you would have grounds to give him a red tag. Well, you delivered him the money and he failed to deliver the product. This could start adding up if you do this too often. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 12, 2019, 06:57:20 PM AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help? :D I went ahead and supported your red flag. I certainly hope that some members of this forum don't decide to give you flack, since you deliberately made a deal with this person so you would have grounds to give him a red tag. Well, you delivered him the money and he failed to deliver the product. This could start adding up if you do this too often. Thank you! That sounds weird, the guy is a scammer and soon to be proven alt of one other major active scammer and he took the sting to prove it. Stranger things happen here so "whatever". Life will go on. :D Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: STP on August 14, 2019, 09:24:05 AM Looking for support - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175274.0
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=623 edit: other member created flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=789338;page=iflags Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175320.0 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 14, 2019, 03:50:29 PM Please support flag on this guy. Existing trust is self explanatory.
Trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=630 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on August 14, 2019, 03:58:12 PM Please support flag on this guy. Existing trust is self explanatory. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007) Supported. You may want to update it with the direct link of the flag which is this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=630 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 15, 2019, 08:21:28 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=634
Quite obvious. Gift cards - locked, self-moderated & auto-buy alt of the "REFOUND" guy. Has at least 12 other past alts many of which have been nuked. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 16, 2019, 01:40:10 PM User - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2523468
Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175710.0 Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=638 Reason for flag - See ridiculous loan request below (Scammers gon’ scam) Hi guys! I need a loan of $10k and I'm willing to put $5,000 on the line as to show you how serious about this I am. I'll repay the loan with in a 7 day period and willing to provide more information for peice of mind to the lender. Please contact me on telegram @galactivale or or post your telegram Bellow. Edited: I know I'm a newbie so don't remind me Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on August 16, 2019, 01:47:50 PM Oh yeah, I seen it other day and was laughing out of my ass LOL
Anyway supported and is going to tag the user too. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: tmfp on August 16, 2019, 07:25:54 PM Where do I find a list of all flags created? tia Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 16, 2019, 07:28:22 PM Where do I find a list of all flags created? Good point, I've just added this to the OP:Trust Flag viewer See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0) for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?MD directly for the data. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: ivndnkn on August 23, 2019, 06:12:08 PM Hello, i need some support for my flags:
Reason for flag: my funds withheld with no particular reason. Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088396.0 Link to flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=657, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=658 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on August 23, 2019, 06:31:27 PM Hello, i need some support for my flags: Reason for flag: my funds withheld with no particular reason. Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088396.0 Link to flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=657, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=658 My support is added. I am familiar with the scam from when it was first reported by ivndnkn and I have helped highlight and expose the HolyTransaction / Flyp.me scammers. The scammers at HolyTransaction / Flyp.me are selective scamming and cannot be trusted. Best to avoid these scammers. Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on September 05, 2019, 01:12:45 PM Can I request opposition to flags?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=695 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=696 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=697 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=698 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=699 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=700 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=701 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=702 Title: Re: Request support for Flags here! Post by: shasan on September 05, 2019, 01:17:57 PM Can I request opposition to flags? I think support and opposite should be in the same place. Anyway, I have opposed all the flags mentioned by you.Title: Support my flags and scam case against the Rock Trading Exchange Post by: Coinfan on September 10, 2019, 01:09:28 PM Please support the flags against the Rock Trading CFO and Rock Trading CTO to help warn about them:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=206 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=207 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=493 and give them negative feedback: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=35172 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=15648 Quick updated summary: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.0 I) I have on the Rock Trading exchange 35519 euros and they covertly blocked all my means of withdrawal, including all crypto, 20 months ago (see balance scan below). II) They refused several times to explain why. Now they wrote it was because the account was "dormant". Which is a complete lie: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg51377323#msg51377323 III) They didn't tell me about the withdrawal block and let me keep entrapping more money with a deposit and trading/paying fees for months unaware of the block against what their TOS demands. This is fraud and a scam. IV) When I complained on August 2018, they demanded my documents against what their FAQ said "verification isn't mandatory"and the Rock CFO had confirmed me by email that verification was voluntary. They removed this reference to the voluntary nature of verification probably on 16 may 2019, which is another confession that they are breaching it. But the original version is conserved here as it was on 2 November 2018: https://archive.fo/BNSfb https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg51152105#msg51152105 V) Since I argued this, they eventually said I didn't have to send my documents, but they said that my money would be kept blocked "much more time". VI) When I said I would take this public, they started demanding my documents again. VII) Mandatory verification has no basis on their TOS, so they lied about an applicable european directive. But they know that the IV AML Directive ins't applicable to crypto exchanges. And the V AML Directive hasn't been adopted by Italy and it isn't applicable until Italy converts it into Italian Law. Moreover, even the V AML Directive only applies to crypto when there is fiat conversion/withdrawal. I want to withdraw bitcoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg51753117#msg51753117 VIII) Italian Law, Legislative Decree No. 231/2007, as emended by Legislative Decree No. 90 of 25 May 2017, on AML and KYC duties, but his article 3, n.º 5, i), says that crypto exchanges are restrictively ("limitatamente") subject to this duties only on their operations of conversion from crypto to fiat. That is, to customers who ask for fiat withdrawals. I left clear that I wouldn't ask for any fiat withdrawal. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50490829#msg50490829 IX) They confessed they are ready to keep my money "forever" (cit), under the pretext of the illegal KYC: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg47458158#msg47458158 X) For months they kept raising abusive suspicious about my ownership, ignoring the overwhelming evidence, which is a fact confirming that asking for my documents is just a pretext in order for them to keep my money blocked. No honest person would deny my ownership. If I sent them my documents they would invent another pretext. XI) What they are doing is completely contrary to italian law (quoted above) and their own TOS/FAQ (see detailed analysis https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg46225609#msg46225609 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg45001851#msg45001851 XII) This is now on the european arbitrage system and on an Italian Financial Arbitrator, after a complaint with full disclose of identity with the same names they have on file. This was confirmed by a banking transfer to pay for the complaint cost and by documents sent. There is no longer any anonymity, but they still refuse to return my money. Since the Arbitrator said nothing, an italian prosecutor office, the italian garante of privacy and another financial authority were also contacted about this case. XIII) Recently, they confessed several times that there isn't any security reason and that they know that the money is mine. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50017001#msg50017001 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50381769#msg50381769 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50353964#msg50353964 XIV) They also confessed they are holding my money just to know who I am: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg49576928#msg49576928 This is against their TOS and Italian Law. But they know that if they were right, the Arbitrator would give them all details. So, it's clear that this isn't the real reason. XV) They also confessed that if they lose the case they are not going to respect the decision of the Arbitrator to release my money: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50017001#msg50017001 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50344427#msg50344427 XVI) Beware, the Rock CFO wrote he is ready to do to every unverified customer what they are doing to me, even without changing their own TOS/FAQ: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50060106#msg50060106 (translation and comment) XVII) They breached their duty to respect the privacy of their customers and account security. They published here on bitcointalk almost all the personal details they had, including first name, nationality, gender, banking relations on a EU country and a full text of an 2013 email which was irrelevant to their defense: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5025233.msg49989828#msg49989828 (italian) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50343815#msg50343815 XVIII) They confessed that they are not acting under their TOS/FAQ or italian law (so, they accept that they are breaching both) but claim to be "anticipating" the V AML European Directive that they know isn't applicable in Italy until converted in Italian Law: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5025233.msg50016475#msg50016475 (italian) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg50528161#msg50528161 (translation and comment) XIX) Recently, on the end of July 2019, they inserted a new sentence on their FAQ: "If your account is unverified you will not be able to trade, deposit or withdraw cryptocurrencies and/or euro." https://support.therocktrading.com/kb/faq.php?id=64 They are trying to "clean" now acts they done on December 2017 and August 2018! The authorities will see this as a clear confession of the illegality of these acts. Only changes FAQ the ones who breached them! XX) They confirmed the main facts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg44951057#msg44951057 My evidence: I) I have the login and password of my Rock account. II) I have the login and password of the email associated with the account and I wrote them using this email. III) The IP I have is and always have been from the same country and location. IV) There is a second Rock account that the Rock knows is related to me. An email was sent from that email account confirming my identity. V) I quoted detailed conversations I had with the CTO Paci on Second Life 6 years ago. VI) I can confirm my identity using the Second Life account associated with my Rock account. VII) I still own the banking account with the account number (IBAN) the Rock Trading has on file. VIII) There is a coincidence between the two names on file with the Rock and names on the complaint to the Arbitrator. IX) Recently, I signed a message with a bitcoin address used to make a deposit on the Rock Trading in 1 June 2017: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg51271058#msg51271058 X) About 12 months passed since this public war started. If I wasn't the owner, the real me would already claimed the money. I told them I wouldn't login again and no one has login on the account for 10 months. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on September 21, 2019, 04:22:47 AM Need support:
Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=755) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5186348 Reason: Loan defualted. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on September 21, 2019, 04:32:19 AM Need support: Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=755) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5186348 Reason: Loan defualted. Supported. Just curious - why did you use type 2 (casual/implied) instead of type 3 (written)? To me it seems a loan like that is a solid written contract. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on September 21, 2019, 04:34:14 AM Need support: Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=755) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5186348 Reason: Loan defualted. Supported. Just curious - why did you use type 2 (casual/implied) instead of type 3 (written)? To me it seems a loan like that is a solid written contract. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on September 21, 2019, 07:31:45 PM Maybe is offtopic, but it's related to flags. I guess LoyceV is adequate to answer :D
Is there any statistics on how much each user have supported/opposed flags? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 21, 2019, 08:46:03 PM Is there any statistics on how much each user have supported/opposed flags? See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0) :)Or Personal Trust Flag viewer for examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 24, 2019, 05:00:49 PM Here is a request to have these flags removed because they have been created purely as a defence mechanism to attack the users that exposed their scam. Could moderators please ban the sock-puppet accounts because they have created flags against users that are vexatious and vindictive in nature. As per the following post from theymos, I request action be taken: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.msg51435911 "Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed." The following flags have been created by sock-puppets owned and operated by Spectrocoin / Bankera owner VYTAUTAS KARALEVIČIUS. Many of his sock-puppet accounts have supported the flags too to give them a false sense of backing. The common factor between these flags is that they were created in response to attack well respected members of this community because they exposed Bankera and Spectrocoin as scammers. Both are operated by scammers VYTAUTAS KARALEVIČIUS https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags (a revenge attack on mosprognoz) created by: EA001 supported by: SpectroCoin_support, Bankera, huup, JohnnyBTC197, jamolo, JimmySlander, Scroogge, EA001, moris2025, MontyMcMoo, weriu, macinino, Edvardas11, Valsabbiacoin, gazpa created by: jamolo supported by: huup, kronwel, JohnnyBTC197, jamolo, SP!, JimmySlander, Scroogge, EA001, moris2025, MontyMcMoo, majestyz5, manocoinas, macinino, Valsabbiacoin, DCP1979, gazpa https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855;page=iflags (a revenge attack on JollyGood) created by: JimmySlander supported by: JimmySlander https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618;page=iflags (a revenge attack on nutildah) created by: JohnnyBTC197 supported by: JohnnyBTC197, jamolo, JimmySlander, Scroogge, moris2025, MontyMcMoo, macinino https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1165766;page=iflags (a revenge attack on gorbal) created by: JimmySlander supported by: huup, humerh3, JohnnyBTC197, jamolo, SP!, JimmySlander, Scroogge, EA001, moris2025, MontyMcMoo, gryazev1978, macinino, Valsabbiacoin, gazpa Until such time the moderators hopefully remove the flags and hopefully ban the sock-puppet accounts I request that users from the community kindly add their opposition to all of the flags. Thank you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 24, 2019, 06:04:47 PM As per the following post from theymos, I request action be taken: I don't expect Admin to remove Flags, theymos only said he'll work on removing them from DT, and these users aren't anywhere near DT.Quote The following flags I made BBCode for this in my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0):Quote 2019-09-24 Tue 03.18h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/121.html) 600 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=600) jamolo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2228349.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.0)). Supported by huup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2425032.html), kronwel (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/137466.html), JohnnyBTC197 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2595324.html), jamolo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2228349.html), SP! (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2426513.html), JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html), Scroogge (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2447925.html), EA001 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2589739.html), moris2025 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2305878.html), MontyMcMoo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660801.html), majestyz5 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2614963.html), manocoinas (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2301926.html), macinino (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660191.html), Valsabbiacoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2661540.html), DCP1979 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2661567.html), gazpa (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2663800.html). Opposed by bones261 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/452769.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JeromeTash (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1190631.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), blurryeyed (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/885996.html), Coinfan (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/82709.html), logfiles (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1247226.html). 601 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=601) JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html) flagged 616 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=616) EA001 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2589739.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.0)). Supported by SpectroCoin_support (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/816438.html), Bankera (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1101537.html), huup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2425032.html), JohnnyBTC197 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2595324.html), jamolo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2228349.html), JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html), Scroogge (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2447925.html), EA001 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2589739.html), moris2025 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2305878.html), MontyMcMoo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660801.html), weriu (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2544230.html), macinino (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660191.html), Edvardas11 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2661470.html), Valsabbiacoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2661540.html), gazpa (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2663800.html). Opposed by bones261 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/452769.html), tmfp (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/351569.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JeromeTash (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1190631.html), IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), blurryeyed (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/885996.html), Coinfan (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/82709.html), logfiles (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1247226.html). 617 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=617) JohnnyBTC197 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2595324.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0)). Supported by JohnnyBTC197 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2595324.html), jamolo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2228349.html), JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html), Scroogge (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2447925.html), moris2025 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2305878.html), MontyMcMoo (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660801.html), macinino (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2660191.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), mocacinno (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/405464.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JeromeTash (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1190631.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html). 743 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=743) JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html) flagged JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.0)). Supported by JimmySlander (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1811999.html). Opposed by mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), Coinfan (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/82709.html). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on September 24, 2019, 06:09:16 PM A couple of new contract flags for a known scammer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=766 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=767 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 26, 2019, 06:18:59 PM @Loyce
Regarding this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg52546722#msg52546722 Those flags have been created with a specific allegation, take for example this one: "jamolo alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with jamolo alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with mosprognoz is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions." The thread in question is "Bankera" and neither mosprognoz, myself, nutildah or gorbal asked for money. The allegation is that anybody dealing with any of us is at significant risk of losing money. That is wholly false. Is there any action at all that be taken against the authors of these vexatious claims? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on September 26, 2019, 06:19:35 PM Bitstarz not only preventing a player from receiving their winnings but also preventing them from receiving their deposit. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=770
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 26, 2019, 06:23:22 PM Is there any action at all that be taken against the authors of these vexatious claims? I'd say Opposing the Flags by DT, and maybe excluding the users from their Trust list is enough. They're unimportant to the Trust system.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on September 26, 2019, 06:29:03 PM Bitstarz not only preventing a player from receiving their winnings but also preventing them from receiving their deposit. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=770 Shouldn't this be an implied contract flag? This is similar to the Livecoin issue I think. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on September 26, 2019, 06:31:16 PM Bitstarz not only preventing a player from receiving their winnings but also preventing them from receiving their deposit. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=770 Shouldn't this be an implied contract flag? This is similar to the Livecoin issue I think.I messaged the user in question regarding the issue so if a type 2 fits better then we can talk to them about it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: huup on September 26, 2019, 06:50:35 PM @Loyce Regarding this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg52546722#msg52546722 Those flags have been created with a specific allegation, take for example this one: "jamolo alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with jamolo alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with mosprognoz is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions." The thread in question is "Bankera" and neither mosprognoz, myself, nutildah or gorbal asked for money. The allegation is that anybody dealing with any of us is at significant risk of losing money. That is wholly false. Is there any action at all that be taken against the authors of these vexatious claims? Yeah.... did you also mention the fact that you repeatedly picked a fight at that topic and continuously choose to spread false info. Like phone numbers supposedly not working, sending false office claims. Etc... I even saw a claim where a picture off a souvenir shop was used to tell the people that that was the office off bankera. Next to that you and your friend mosprognoz made dozens off post on the topic with dozens off lies and then started a topic there was to much “buzz” and pump’s? You are the scam artist here and a disgrace to this entire space. The thread is locked thnx to you and your spamming friend. We never minded you to post on your own topics all those false claims about my project. But who gives you the right to fuck up the conversation for other people? Who gives you the right to make this ridiculously false stupid claims all day long. Real people invested in those projects and you come by for the fun off it and make that shit? Multiple official agencies have tested, audited and have given licenses. But somehow you think you are an authority? Hope you had your fun keyboard warrior. But if you had any balls you showed us your reall name and didn’t have to have hide behind your fake profile. Because in the real world where real authorities live you would have been sued into oblivion. With your stupid scam list! Anyway you got what you want the topic is closed. Pathetic child! aja and claiming on 23 september you are not going to post on our topics anymore: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5186721.msg52537677#msg52537677 But 24 september (a day later starting again, isn's exactlty stopping) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577176.msg52546568#msg52546568 the only reason it stopped is because the thread was locked. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 26, 2019, 07:02:40 PM Is there any action at all that be taken against the authors of these vexatious claims? I'd say Opposing the Flags by DT, and maybe excluding the users from their Trust list is enough. They're unimportant to the Trust system.Thank you Loyce. Great advice as usual. I made it clear in a post in a different thread I would not be posting in the Bankera scam and Spectrocoin scam threads again as they were being pushed up with every post however when the sock-puppets posted nothing happened, the thread was regularly languishing around pages 4-6 of the listing. I also sent a request to other users to not post in those scam threads again because of the unfortunate side-effect of pushing the scams to page 1 of the listings. On my part I added all the sock-puppets related to the Spectrocoin scam and the Bankera scam as well as several other scams on my IGNORE list because they were not worth engaging with. Fortunately, now when they post I only see the user name and do not have to read their trash. Sometimes they follow me around and post after me in various threads but at least I do not have to read anything they post. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 26, 2019, 07:03:55 PM Reminder:
No spam Self moderated to stop spam. Don't go off-topic. Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on September 27, 2019, 07:24:28 AM Is there any action at all that be taken against the authors of these vexatious claims? I'd say Opposing the Flags by DT, and maybe excluding the users from their Trust list is enough. They're unimportant to the Trust system.Thank you Loyce. Great advice as usual. I made it clear in a post in a different thread I would not be posting in the Bankera scam and Spectrocoin scam threads again as they were being pushed up with every post however when the sock-puppets posted nothing happened, the thread was regularly languishing around pages 4-6 of the listing. I also sent a request to other users to not post in those scam threads again because of the unfortunate side-effect of pushing the scams to page 1 of the listings. On my part I added all the sock-puppets related to the Spectrocoin scam and the Bankera scam as well as several other scams on my IGNORE list because they were not worth engaging with. Fortunately, now when they post I only see the user name and do not have to read their trash. Sometimes they follow me around and post after me in various threads but at least I do not have to read anything they post. Unfortunately there's nothing you can do to stop someone from opening a flag on you, but as Loyce pointed out, the flags are of little to no importance thanks to the lack of status of the accounts supporting it. Not much more to be done about Bankera at this point anyway! I think flags disappear after, what was it? 90 or 180 days without support? But since the flags against us do technically have support, I don't think they're going anywhere, unfortunately... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 27, 2019, 07:57:02 AM I think flags disappear after, what was it? 90 or 180 days without support? I haven't read that before. I don't think Flags ever disappear, although type 2 expires after 3 years, and type 3 expires after 10 years.Type 1 is forever! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 27, 2019, 11:50:20 AM Unfortunately there's nothing you can do to stop someone from opening a flag on you, but as Loyce pointed out, the flags are of little to no importance thanks to the lack of status of the accounts supporting it. Not much more to be done about Bankera at this point anyway! I think flags disappear after, what was it? 90 or 180 days without support? But since the flags against us do technically have support, I don't think they're going anywhere, unfortunately... Who knows, maybe in the future modifications will be made that allow certain higher ranked members to remove certain types of flags. Keeping that aside you are right when you say the flags have little or no support and therefore little relevance regardless of whether they stay put or not. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on September 27, 2019, 02:58:04 PM I think flags disappear after, what was it? 90 or 180 days without support? I haven't read that before. I don't think Flags ever disappear, although type 2 expires after 3 years, and type 3 expires after 10 years.Type 1 is forever! Ah sorry, I must have brain cancer or something. Well, if you don't have at least 1 flag on your Trust page, then you aren't doing anything very interesting... Its kind of like a badge of honor. Unless its active. Then you might be a scammer. Who knows, maybe in the future modifications will be made that allow certain higher ranked members to remove certain types of flags. I think the option for someone to erase their own flag should definitely be considered, but I'll save expanding on that point for a different thread... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 27, 2019, 03:11:55 PM Well, if you don't have at least 1 flag on your Trust page, then you aren't doing anything very interesting... Guess I'm just boring.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on September 27, 2019, 04:20:45 PM Well, if you don't have at least 1 flag on your Trust page, then you aren't doing anything very interesting... Guess I'm just boring.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on September 27, 2019, 06:54:20 PM although type 2 expires after 3 years, and type 3 expires after 10 years. So, after 3/10 years scammer will have chance to scam again, good!! very good!!!Type 1 is forever! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 27, 2019, 07:01:49 PM So, after 3/10 years scammer will have chance to scam again, good!! very good!!! Correct:A new scammer flag should be created for each separate alleged incident. In the spirit of forgiveness/redemption, scammer flags expire 3 years after the incident if the contract was casual/implied, and 10 years after the incident if the contract was written. These expiration times might be administratively changed in specific cases. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: abel1337 on September 28, 2019, 02:10:39 AM So, after 3/10 years scammer will have chance to scam again, good!! very good!!! Correct:Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 28, 2019, 08:14:00 AM Can there be a possibility that a flag account that is once flagged can be flagged again The 3 or 10 years for Type 2 and 3 Flags starts counting at the time of the incident, not when the flag was created. Example (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=565024):Quote It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around March 2019. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on September 28, 2019, 01:02:33 PM ~snip~ It's a long time and if you think about the positive side then in 3 to 10 years a person can turn into a good person. Everyone needs to have a chance to redemption themselves.So, after 3/10 years scammer will have chance to scam again, good!! very good!!! I liked this idea however in reality we will see the scammers will abandoned the account long before they have their clean time to come. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 28, 2019, 01:34:23 PM Who knows, maybe in the future modifications will be made that allow certain higher ranked members to remove certain types of flags. I think the option for someone to erase their own flag should definitely be considered, but I'll save expanding on that point for a different thread... Maybe right now that is something just not on the agenda because of the recent introduction of 'bump' but if someone opens a flag it stands to reason he should be allowed to delete it especially if the point of dispute is resolved. Having flags active for a minimum of 3 years is quite excessive if two parties involved find a solution and no longer have a dispute and harsh if both parties want the flag removed. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on September 28, 2019, 03:11:20 PM Bitcoin SV (BSV) [#2] (active account)
Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2558986 Reason: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=777 #1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: tmfp on September 28, 2019, 11:01:57 PM We have a bunch of scammers going under the MAYA Preferred shitcoin umbrella, now throwing their weight about and threatening legal action against a whistleblower here. Their other accounts have been tagged/flagged but they open new ones, including Maya Preferred Official (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2671761), which is the subject of this flag for which I am asking support, especially as it is now starting crude self moderated threads. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=778 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on September 29, 2019, 01:46:47 PM ^ You have the support.
especially as it is now starting crude self moderated threads. I wonder how a project with plagiarized content go that much?https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=778 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: bigkahuna2 on September 29, 2019, 03:35:43 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5187248.msg52545805#msg52545805
thank you please help me red flag scamer here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=780 This user has several alts: Embroiderymate https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=709833 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171027.msg52021996#msg52021996 http://archive.fo/HK1hK angryrob https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106181 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5122763.msg52407915#msg52407915 http://archive.fo/dc6Th CouponKingUK https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2062811 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3386534.msg35480718#msg35480718 http://archive.fo/LEHJg buy4meuk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2549156 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5176607.msg52194051#msg52194051 http://archive.fo/rnaa0 PumpAndDumpScript https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1056667 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2006845.msg19978394#msg19978394 http://archive.fo/QeNaV HouseOfWesteros https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1157780 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175430.msg52157319#msg52157319 http://archive.fo/I4DTH Affiliated addresses: Email bitcoin191uk@gmail.com Email: mytiptopshop@gmail.com Email: embroiderymate@gmail.com Telegram @couponkinguk Skype: embroiderymate@gmail.com Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: tmfp on September 29, 2019, 08:39:21 PM We have a bunch of scammers going under the MAYA Preferred shitcoin umbrella, now throwing their weight about and threatening legal action against a whistleblower here. Their other accounts have been tagged/flagged but they open new ones, including Maya Preferred Official (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2671761), which is the subject of this flag for which I am asking support, especially as it is now starting crude self moderated threads. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=778 And another one on the same Maya scam topic, this one for the Joseph L Cord (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1719030) account which opened their [ANN] thread. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126669.0) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=782 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 03, 2019, 01:47:00 PM Bankera shill and scammer huup https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032 created two false flags. One in the profile of JollyGood and another in my profile. You can read about him and his alias here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0
False flags : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=787 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=789 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on October 03, 2019, 03:04:07 PM Bankera shill and scammer huup https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032 created two false flags. One in the profile of JollyGood and another in my profile. You can read about him and his alias here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0 False flags : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=787 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=789 Don't forget this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=788 Looks like they're still upset over the Bankera thread getting locked. :'( Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on October 03, 2019, 03:14:06 PM Bankera shill and scammer huup https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032 created two false flags. One in the profile of JollyGood and another in my profile. You can read about him and his alias here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0 False flags : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=787 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=789 Don't forget this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=788 Looks like they're still upset over the Bankera thread getting locked. :'( Looks like someone's on their way to having the most inactive flags against their account ;D I now wonder who does have the most inactive flags to be honest, no doubt some good scambuster. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 03, 2019, 03:31:23 PM I now wonder who does have the most inactive flags to be honest, no doubt some good scambuster. I think Veleor wears this badge of honour (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html):Quote 2019-10-03 Thu 03.18h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/130.html) 316 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=316) korner (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1096223.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4859231.0)). Supported by korner (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1096223.html), Alex LZ Saver (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2620423.html), reckon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2544811.html), Sorbent (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2618696.html), exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html). Opposed by Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), diks (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/344996.html), yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), Lafu (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/805820.html), Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html), LeGaulois (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/507856.html), TheFuzzStone (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/679341.html), MaoChao (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/410541.html), micgoossens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1067333.html), xtraelv (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/897509.html), chimk (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1202061.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), iasenko (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1291828.html), witcher_sense (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1433865.html), Alex_Sr (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1762404.html), madnessteat (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1894120.html), DIKUL (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2148411.html), FontSeli (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2221613.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), logfiles (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1247226.html), VyachikO (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2123089.html), DabLjat (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2197723.html), IMadeYouReadThis (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2611158.html). 421 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=421) reckon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2544811.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5020193.0)). Supported by Alex LZ Saver (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2620423.html), reckon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2544811.html), exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html). Opposed by Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), Lafu (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/805820.html), Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html), micgoossens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1067333.html), witcher_sense (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1433865.html), Alex_Sr (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1762404.html)[/size]. 422 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=422) Sorbent (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2618696.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5020190.0)). Supported by Alex LZ Saver (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2620423.html), Sorbent (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2618696.html), exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html). Opposed by Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), Lafu (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/805820.html), Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html), micgoossens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1067333.html), pandukelana2712 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1304130.html), Alex_Sr (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1762404.html)[/size]. 554 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=554) Alex LZ Saver (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2620423.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171768.0)). Supported by Alex LZ Saver (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2620423.html), exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), xandry (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/382413.html), johhnyUA (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/623643.html), FontSeli (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2221613.html). 593 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=593) exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173396.0)). Supported by EVg98 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2311414.html), exp0it (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2621930.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), chimk (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1202061.html), madnessteat (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1894120.html), Ratimov (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2627711.html). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 03, 2019, 09:45:40 PM Bankera shill and scammer huup https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032 created two false flags. One in the profile of JollyGood and another in my profile. You can read about him and his alias here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0 It is typical revenge behaviour by scammers to open false flags against those that oppose them or expose them. The other thing is it shows their level of desperation too.False flags : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=787 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=789 One of the things that I just do not understand is why are they continuously posting propaganda there with sock-puppets when they are not getting any business (or getting very little business) from this forum. The coinsbit thread for example is full of trash too just like the Spectrocoin and Bankera threads yet they constantly purchase accounts and use newbies to create an army of sock-puppets to flood the thread with propaganda but they are not getting real genuine users posting there and are probably getting near zero business from here but they continue to post propaganda and flood. The question is why do they do it here when it brings no obvious benefit to them? Don't forget this one: Well they just had to go after me too ;Dhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=788 Looks like they're still upset over the Bankera thread getting locked. :'( You are right, they locked both the Bankera and Spectrocoin threads so must be extremely upset. They lashed out using their sock-puppets in frustration by creating these false flags against anybody the challenged them but they have just made themselves look even more pathetic in their desperation. They have some flags against you too so you definitely rattled them too when you challenged them ! The Scam Accusation thread covering Bankera/Spectrocoin created by mosprognoz is an excellent piece of work. It is very detailed and it deserves credit for exposing the scammers in the way in which he did and that is the main reason they are fabricating information against him: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174337.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 04, 2019, 01:42:57 PM Looks like someone's on their way to having the most inactive flags against their account ;D I now wonder who does have the most inactive flags to be honest, no doubt some good scambuster. I think it's me now, because another bankera paid shill and a scammer moris2025 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2305878 opened a new flag in my profile yesterday. False flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=799 This is becoming really annoying. If scammers will continue this way, I will go to guinness book as a world record holder of false flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: bigkahuna2 on October 05, 2019, 01:34:53 AM please ok this red flag for scamer, embroidermate has 6 other names and embroidermate is the one who scam me and this scamer is one of them.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=807 even his email says embroidermate. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 06, 2019, 05:30:56 PM Well.. this is getting really bad. two brand new and one old accounts just opened three false flags in my and JollyGood profiles. Both of them are for violation of a written contract. Reference links provided are also false.
Scammers profiles. sockpuppet2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2691000 sock-puppet https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690989 moris2025 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2305878 False flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=805 I don't know what to do ? Now anyone can create 1000 false flags without getting punished. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 06, 2019, 05:46:50 PM I don't know what to do ? The Reference threads are invalid, so there's not much to worry about. But I get that it's annoying.I could offer to allow the accused to add a commentary to my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0), but that's not the most obvious place to check when someone sees an inactive Flag on your profile. If anyone is interested, I can add the commentary feature. But I won't restrict it to "the good guys" only: all accused users can use it if I make it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 06, 2019, 06:05:23 PM Well.. this is getting really bad. two brand new and one old accounts just opened three false flags in my and JollyGood profiles. Both of them are for violation of a written contract. Reference links provided are also false. Scammers profiles. sockpuppet2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2691000 sock-puppet https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690989 moris2025 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2305878 False flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=805 I don't know what to do ? Now anyone can create 1000 false flags without getting punished. Well it is clear we rattled the Bankera/Spectrocoin scammers to the point they locked their threads so this is the only reaction these imbeciles have ;D Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: witcher_sense on October 07, 2019, 05:54:37 AM I request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=825
A project called RoyaltyCoin provided us with white paper that was almost completely copied from another project with a similar idea called Inmusik. In white paper, the name Inmusik is replaced by RoyaltyCoin, there is also a small amount of rewriting that still does not change most phrases. You can read more about this investigation here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190530.0 I also checked the team profiles on LinkedIn, the RoyaltyCoin project is not mentioned anywhere. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on October 09, 2019, 07:52:18 AM Looks like someone's on their way to having the most inactive flags against their account ;D I now wonder who does have the most inactive flags to be honest, no doubt some good scambuster. I think it's me now, because another bankera paid shill and a scammer moris2025 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2305878 opened a new flag in my profile yesterday. False flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=799 This is becoming really annoying. If scammers will continue this way, I will go to guinness book as a world record holder of false flags. You can add another one to your tally: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=831 And JollyGood one to his: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=832 Those Bankera guys are still pretty cheesed off at you! They came in with guns blazing, fired up about 25 different accounts, and are still created more even after their thread has been locked. Also while I'm here, here's 3 more stupid retaliatory flags that should also be opposed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=828 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=829 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=830 They are in retaliation for this flag, which should be supported: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=827 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 09, 2019, 09:28:51 AM Those Bankera guys are still pretty cheesed off at you! They came in with guns blazing, fired up about 25 different accounts, and are still created more even after their thread has been locked. Yes the Bankera/Spectrocoin scammer that controls the sock-puppets has so much time on his hands he does not know what to do now since locking both of the scam threads. The pathetic imbecile decided to do something constructive with his time by creating more sock-puppets just to open more and more fake flags against those that exposed their ridiculous scams. Thank you for the links to the other flags, I supported and opposed them accordingly. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 10, 2019, 08:58:44 PM False flags. Those Flags have been removed! I haven't seen an official statement on this.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818 I noticed this because the last update of my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0) was smaller than the previous: my script stops after 3 Flags in a row don't exist. The next update will have a higher error limit. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 10, 2019, 09:31:02 PM False flags. Those Flags have been removed! I haven't seen an official statement on this.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818 I noticed this because the last update of my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0) was smaller than the previous: my script stops after 3 Flags in a row don't exist. The next update will have a higher error limit. These have also been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=831 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=832 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 11, 2019, 07:24:30 AM False flags. Those Flags have been removed! I haven't seen an official statement on this.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818 These have also been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=831 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=832 A lot of people are saying that Theymos does not care about scammers, that are doing shady things, including false flagging. But in fact everything is complete opposite. Theymos does care about such things. I informed him about that false flags and here is his answer. The flags and ratings from the spam alts are removed, and those alts are permabanned. huup and moris2025, who were behind those alts, are banned for 90 days, but their flags remain, since trust is not moderated except for obvious spam. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 11, 2019, 11:53:53 AM The flags and ratings from the spam alts are removed, and those alts are permabanned. huup and moris2025, who were behind those alts, are banned for 90 days, but their flags remain, since trust is not moderated except for obvious spam. Well scammers huup and moris2025 just might be getting ready to use more sock-puppets in the 90 days they cannot login in just to keep busy... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: xtraelv on October 11, 2019, 07:00:51 PM Forum dickhead Hatch Support has been busy making flags:
https://i.imgur.com/mBR9zuR.png https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=853 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=852 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=851 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=850 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=849 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=848 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=847 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=846 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=845 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=844 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=843 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=842 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=841 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=840 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=839 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=853;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=852;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=851;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=850;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=849;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=848;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=847;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=846;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=845;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=844;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=843;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=842;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=841;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=840;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=839;oppose Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: morvillz7z on October 11, 2019, 07:17:11 PM I opposed all.
Would be nice to see a flag abuser like Hatch Support receive some sort of punishment for his actions, being that temp or perma ban. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 11, 2019, 07:36:27 PM Forum dickhead Hatch Support has been busy making flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=853;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=852;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=851;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=850;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=849;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=848;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=847;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=846;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=845;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=844;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=843;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=842;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=841;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=840;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=839;oppose Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have opposed them all and and also left appropriate feedback for both his accounts: Hatch Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2689172 Hatch Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2477143 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on October 12, 2019, 08:39:22 AM Forum dickhead Hatch Support has been busy making flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=853;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=852;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=851;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=850;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=849;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=848;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=847;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=846;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=845;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=844;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=843;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=842;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=841;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=840;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=839;oppose Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have opposed them all and and also left appropriate feedback for both his accounts: Hatch Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2689172 Hatch Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2477143 He created another flag, now to me just because I oppose all of his flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=857 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 12, 2019, 09:19:25 AM He created another flag, now to me just because I oppose all of his flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=857 Please contact mod and ask to ban that idiot. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 12, 2019, 09:34:22 AM He created another flag, now to me just because I oppose all of his flags. The system is open to abuse and this is the clearest example.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=857 If this is not sufficient evidence enough for moderators to have enough authority to ban these types of imbeciles then what is? Please contact mod and ask to ban that idiot. I hope both his user accounts Hatch Support and Hatch Exchange get bannedTitle: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on October 13, 2019, 09:50:43 AM Forum dickhead Hatch Support has been busy making flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=853;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=852;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=851;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=850;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=849;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=848;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=847;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=846;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=845;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=844;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=843;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=842;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=841;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=840;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=839;oppose Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have opposed them all and and also left appropriate feedback for both his accounts: Hatch Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2689172 Hatch Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2477143 He created another flag, now to me just because I oppose all of his flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=857 Likewise to me as well psycodad for the same reasoning ::) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=863 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=864 Looks like an efficient way to gain negative feedback at least :) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=863;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=864;oppose Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 13, 2019, 09:58:19 AM Likewise to me as well psycodad for the same reasoning ::) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=863 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=864 I opposed them. As I said before, the system is open to abuse. It is a pity moderators have no functionaity to remove fake and revenge flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: psycodad on October 13, 2019, 11:38:06 AM Likewise to me as well psycodad for the same reasoning ::) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=863 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=864 I opposed them. As I said before, the system is open to abuse. It is a pity moderators have no functionaity to remove fake and revenge flags. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, what an utter twat, though it also feels a bit like a badge of honour when this idiot tries to flag you ;D Confirms me that I am doing the right thing in opposing/supporting such flags concerning these scammers. And thanks to all opposing that ridiculous trolling attempts. As long as enough people oppose such spam flags I think the system is working just fine. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on October 14, 2019, 09:30:12 AM Latest false flags from Hatch Support:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872 - TwitchySeal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873 - rhomelmabini https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874 - cyberpinoy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874;oppose (cheers for the recent opposition to flags against me and psycodad) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on October 14, 2019, 09:36:22 AM Latest false flags from Hatch Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872 - TwitchySeal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873 - rhomelmabini https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874 - cyberpinoy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874;oppose (cheers for the recent opposition to flags against me and psycodad) Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: psycodad on October 14, 2019, 09:39:39 AM Latest false flags from Hatch Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872 - TwitchySeal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873 - rhomelmabini https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874 - cyberpinoy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874;oppose (cheers for the recent opposition to flags against me and psycodad) Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned? Same here, opposed all. I am not sure if theymos is following here, maybe someone has to bring this to his attention. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on October 14, 2019, 09:50:27 AM Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned? Same here, opposed all. I am not sure if theymos is following here, maybe someone has to bring this to his attention. Well, theymos would probably say "the trust system is not moderated," but perhaps at least a temp ban is in order. On a side note, the project they are advertising is undoubtedly a scam, and they probably have some sort of mental disorder to boot. At least they know how to use the trust system features, even if incorrectly. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on October 15, 2019, 06:52:33 AM Hi, i request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=878
User @M Arif Ramadon made bounty thread for previously reported ponzi scheme Hodium https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185516.0 They have their bounty campaign going on for a few weeks on their website, but recently they added signature campaign part too.More than 20 BTT members joined so far, and new ones coming every day spreading Hodium ponzi. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192350.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: stompix on October 17, 2019, 08:40:46 AM Nice, I got my first flag, also from hatch support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=164749;page=iflags Going through all of them right now, a real pain **** https://i.imgur.com/JyjYMVP.png Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 17, 2019, 02:25:52 PM This is slightly related, so I'm posting it here too:
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 19, 2019, 10:26:48 AM Please Support this flag - Please only post here if there is a Flag.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 10:29:03 AM Please Support this flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889
Signature Campaign Cheater - (Check the feedback from yahoo62278) Btctalk name: Astargath Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459781 Rank: Hero Mmeber Current post count: 4965 MintDice username: Astargath Wear appropriate signature: Yes Wear avatar: Yes Btctalk name : Bardman Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459805 Rank : Hero Member Current post count : 1285 MintDice username : Bardman Wear appropriate signature : Yes Wear avatar : Yes I wouldn't mind applying for a sr.member spot or even Full member for now. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: morvillz7z on October 19, 2019, 10:47:26 AM Please Support this flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889 Signature Campaign Cheater - (Check the feedback from yahoo62278) Isn't the feedback left by yahoo sufficient enough? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo. edit; It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt. I meant multi-accounts as in 'multi-accounting' meaning cheating bounties/sigs with alts. Still, i believe flags should be reserved primarily for scammers and the tag left by yahoo is a pretty significant warning by itself. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 19, 2019, 11:08:17 AM Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo. Agreed. I see no direct reason to "believe that anyone dealing with Astargath is at a high risk of losing money", as stated in the Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889).Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 11:37:23 AM Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo. It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt. Agreed. I see no direct reason to "believe that anyone dealing with Astargath is at a high risk of losing money", as stated in the Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889). he tried to earn $35 by cheating with alts. What's the guarantee that he would not run away if someone trust him with money? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on October 19, 2019, 03:20:31 PM It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt. The negative feedback left by Yahoo is more than enough for such a scenario. Don't sweat yourself off over a trust flag mate. Anyone sensible would be able to notice that the accounts are alts and the person behind them tried to cheat on a bounty.If we go one creating flags for issues like this then trust flags will become meaningless. I have seen so many accounts that have been busted for cheating on bounties... probably thousands of them. Are you going to create flags for all of them? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on October 19, 2019, 05:33:31 PM Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags. No brain required.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=868;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=867;oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=865;oppose Check the links, oppose the flag. Easy. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 19, 2019, 06:03:36 PM Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags. There are 82 Flags with broken Reference links. I made a convenient list of those: Trust Flag viewer: all Flags without a valid Reference topic (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html)Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 19, 2019, 06:08:44 PM Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags. There are 82 Flags with broken Reference links. I made a convenient list of those: Trust Flag viewer: all Flags without a valid Reference topic (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html)If there are flags with broken reference links then by default those flags be removed or auto-deleted. Just my opinion ;) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on October 23, 2019, 03:33:25 PM Hi, i request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=901
tl;dr Textbook shitcoin that currently has IEO on P2PB2B with all kind of abuse (plagiarized content, fake team description, fake profiles in WP) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 26, 2019, 12:48:32 PM Please check this and support the flag because this exchange is extremely shady and the exchange owner is no behaving in psychotic manner making all sorts of wild allegations.
Bituary Exchange thread full of sock-puppet newbies: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194717.0 Proof of selective scamming by Bituary Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195893.0 Proof of psychotic behaviour by Bituary Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195893.msg52884581#msg52884581 More proof of psychotic behaviour by Bituary Exchange attempting revenge: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196172.0 What sort of exchange freezes a user account when he makes a withdrawal. Then is forced to send KYC. Then is told to deposit more BTC in order to allow the withdrawal to take place and then is told to deposit another 1 BTC otherwise account will remain frozen and no withdrawals will be allowed? A scam exchange would do that. I feel sorry for the victim of this scam because having 0.9185 BTC stolen is hard to get over. This thread has the screenshots showing the Bituary Exchange scammers in full flow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194717.msg52872597#msg52872597 --- https://ibb.co/JFL3cyG --- --- https://ibb.co/0G69f29 --- --- https://ibb.co/WVFQ1Cb --- --- https://ibb.co/0JwTQzh --- Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 26, 2019, 01:54:28 PM Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312;page=iflags Please change the link, and link directly to the flag. Depending on custom trust settings, users might not see anything. I see nothing there.We are not responsible for users talking in our thread. I am responsible for users posting here, so I've deleted your post. This is not the place to challenge accusations, please do that in the Flag's reference thread.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on October 26, 2019, 02:01:09 PM Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312;page=iflags Please change the link, and link directly to the flag. Depending on custom trust settings, users might not see anything. I see nothing there.We are not responsible for users talking in our thread. I am responsible for users posting here, so I've deleted your post. This is not the place to challenge accusations, please do that in the Flag's reference thread.Thank you Loyce, well spotted. I updated the link in my previous post. It is here too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Bituary Exchange on October 26, 2019, 02:12:31 PM Request opposition on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312
morvillz7z, nutildah, mosprognoz, Coinfan, s1lverbox, JollyGood are the same owner accounts that are Supporting flag more in thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196172.new#new Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TalkStar on October 27, 2019, 05:47:37 PM Here is another flag link; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=911
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 05, 2019, 11:49:37 AM I noticed Flyp.me (owned by Holy Transaction) scammers are still posting the forum on their thread so wanted to post this Scam Accusation link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088396.msg48850412 Any support would be appreciated because they do not deserve to use this forum as a platform to scam people Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 05, 2019, 12:04:42 PM I noticed Flyp.me (owned by Holy Transaction) scammers are still posting the forum on their thread so wanted to post this Scam Accusation link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088396.msg48850412 Any support would be appreciated because they do not deserve to use this forum as a platform to scam people Neg feedback left and flag supported. Now it is active. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on November 06, 2019, 03:03:00 PM This flag is against user MichalOlszewski (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2707767), who's phishing for a scam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5198643.msg53001129#msg53001129).
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=953 ~ Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 06, 2019, 04:25:50 PM This flag is against user MichalOlszewski (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2707767), who's phishing for a scam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5198643.msg53001129#msg53001129). Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=953 ~ Supported. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on November 08, 2019, 06:36:12 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=957 I'll be adding more there, but need time. Seems some SV fanatics came over to defend that scamcoin. Ironic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=958 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=959 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 09, 2019, 01:24:26 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=957 I'll be adding more there, but need time. Seems some SV fanatics came over to defend that scamcoin. Ironic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=958 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=959 Supported all of them. That moron kingcarsen created 4 false flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 09, 2019, 01:29:31 AM Requesting opposition for false flags created by a well known scammer kingcarsen
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=860708 False flags : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=964 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=963 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=962 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=961 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: kingcarsen on November 09, 2019, 07:22:16 PM Please support the following flags, this forum is full of cesspool trolls like mosprognoz and Lauda, take em down boys! For the record too, fuck Bitcoin SV and fuck Craig Wrong.
mosprognoz, Lauda, suchmoon, and owlcatz are all wanted for defamation, if you have any leads on their personal information, please feel free to shoot me a PM! ;) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=964 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=963 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=962 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=961 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dragonvslinux on November 09, 2019, 09:56:37 PM Please support the following flags, this forum is full of cesspool trolls like mosprognoz and Lauda, take em down boys! For the record too, fuck Bitcoin SV and fuck Craig Wrong. mosprognoz, Lauda, suchmoon, and owlcatz are all wanted for defamation, if you have any leads on their personal information, please feel free to shoot me a PM! ;) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=964 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=963 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=962 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=961 All opposed due to improper flag references, which is ironic to say the least. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TheUltraElite on November 10, 2019, 06:59:19 AM -snip- A good example of the low level of IQ and serious incompetence in creating flags. As expected from scammers living in their basement. ::)Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on November 10, 2019, 07:11:45 AM mosprognoz, Lauda, suchmoon, and owlcatz are all wanted for defamation LOL. "Wanted for defamation". Good one. https://i.imgur.com/y2WYsfu.jpg Flags opposed. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 10, 2019, 11:01:33 AM mosprognoz, Lauda, suchmoon, and owlcatz are all wanted for defamation LOL. "Wanted for defamation". Good one. https://i.imgur.com/y2WYsfu.jpg Flags opposed. ;D This made me laugh The WANTED poster is hilarious Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: tmfp on November 10, 2019, 11:45:37 AM Just consider ourselves lucky that we don't live in South Korea..... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#South_Korea) Quote In South Korea, both true and false statements are can be considered defamation. Any statement made with the intention to harm another person’s reputation can be considered illegal, and those charged may face fines and/or imprisonment of up to seven years. South Korea is the only country in the world where an individual can be found criminally liable and imprisoned for damaging another's reputation by publicly revealing true facts. Quote it is not difficult to file a police report for 'loss of face' in South Korea Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 11, 2019, 02:30:24 PM A Flag has been created by the victim of a fake exchange that currently has withheld $210,000 worth of cypto (around 23.8 BTC)
The reason given was that "law enforcement agencies requested it" and that "the origin of the money is from money laundering". This selective scamming attempt will hopefully backfire on the thieves that set up these businesses to selective scam before implementing their exit strategy. Please support this flag because regardless of the chances of the funds being returned we cannot sit idle and allow these scammers to simply get away with $210,000 worth of cypto without at least making our feelings towards them known. cryptex.net ANN self-moderated thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2454750.0 Scam Accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200216.0 Scam Accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200391.0 Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1235755 Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1235755 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on November 12, 2019, 04:47:22 AM Please oppose this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=975
Frivolous flag, invalid reference. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 12, 2019, 11:41:12 AM Please oppose this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=975 Frivolous flag, invalid reference. The thread mentioned in the Flag seems to have been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200699.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on November 12, 2019, 12:01:48 PM The thread mentioned in the Flag seems to have been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200699.0 That instantly invalidates the Flag.See http://loyce.club/archive/topics/520/5200699.html to see what the topic was all about. Now we're on the subject: there are a few Active Flags (some with many supporters), while the Reference topic has been removed. See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html for the list. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 12, 2019, 12:08:00 PM Now we're on the subject: there are a few Active Flags (some with many supporters), while the Reference topic has been removed. See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html for the list. That's the mod's problem. Why are they removing topics that are flagged ? Any solution ? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 12, 2019, 12:47:17 PM The thread mentioned in the Flag seems to have been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200699.0 That instantly invalidates the Flag.I'm running an update now, when it's done, see http://loyce.club/archive/topics/520/52000699.html to see what the topic was all about. Now we're on the subject: there are a few Active Flags (some with many supporters), while the Reference topic has been removed. See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html for the list. #344 against mosprognoz is one of those dead linked flags. It was created by korner who has now been permanently banned. Those types of flags should be removed, I hope theymos is taking a look at this otherwise anybody can create a flag then delete the thread associated with it. Also if anybody is banned should their flags be automatically deleted too? What are your views? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on November 12, 2019, 12:56:32 PM The thread mentioned in the Flag seems to have been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200699.0 That instantly invalidates the Flag.I'm running an update now, when it's done, see http://loyce.club/archive/topics/520/52000699.html to see what the topic was all about. Now we're on the subject: there are a few Active Flags (some with many supporters), while the Reference topic has been removed. See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html for the list. #344 against mosprognoz is one of those dead linked flags. It was created by korner who has now been permanently banned. Those types of flags should be removed, I hope theymos is taking a look at this otherwise anybody can create a flag hen delete the thread associated with it. Also if anybody is banned should their flags be automatically deleted too? What are your views? If possible, I think a flag made by a banned user linked to a missing thread should be auto-deleted, but being invalidated is just as good. They are far more useless than untrusted ratings. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 12, 2019, 01:00:53 PM #344 against mosprognoz is one of those dead linked flags. It was created by korner who has now been permanently banned. Those types of flags should be removed, I hope theymos is taking a look at this otherwise anybody can create a flag then delete the thread associated with it. Also if anybody is banned should their flags be automatically deleted too? What are your views? Is it possible to delete a thread created by yourself ? I was thinking only mods have that option. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on November 12, 2019, 01:25:10 PM .. If possible, I think a flag made by a banned user linked to a missing thread should be auto-deleted, but being invalidated is just as good. They are far more useless than untrusted ratings. There are several options here. User can be banned because of old plagiarism. This ban does not mean anything if he creates a flag with real proof and has enough support to be active. It can only be towards inactive flags created by a banned user. Also, I find a few flags where flag creator has not associated thread opener and they haven't control to keep live thread. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 12, 2019, 01:45:54 PM .. If possible, I think a flag made by a banned user linked to a missing thread should be auto-deleted, but being invalidated is just as good. They are far more useless than untrusted ratings. There are several options here. User can be banned because of old plagiarism. This ban does not mean anything if he creates a flag with real proof and has enough support to be active. It can only be towards inactive flags created by a banned user. Also, I find a few flags where flag creator has not associated thread opener and they haven't control to keep live thread. Surely if a flag exists for a thread that no longer exists it means the alleged evidence the flag was created on is not available therefore the flag should not exist either. I wonder what the community consensus is on this. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on November 12, 2019, 03:43:03 PM Now we're on the subject: there are a few Active Flags (some with many supporters), while the Reference topic has been removed. See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/ReferenceTopicDoesNotExist.html for the list. That's the mod's problem. Why are they removing topics that are flagged ? Any solution ?The thread mentioned in the Flag seems to have been removed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200699.0 That instantly invalidates the Flag.See http://loyce.club/archive/topics/520/5200699.html to see what the topic was all about. Those types of flags should be removed, I hope theymos is taking a look at this otherwise anybody can create a flag then delete the thread associated with it. So far, only 5 Flags have been removed. I don't think theymos wants to spend too much time on it, it's up to the community to Oppose invalid Flags.Quote Also if anybody is banned should their flags be automatically deleted too? What are your views? No. They can still be valid, just like feedback doesn't get wiped when someone is banned.Is it possible to delete a thread created by yourself ? I was thinking only mods have that option. Users can only move their thread to Archival. Mods can move it to "the trashcan". But a user can just create a worthless thread, use it as Reference, and then wait for a Mod to clean up his thread.Or a user could simply be Nuked, that removes all topics opened by said user. Surely if a flag exists for a thread that no longer exists it means the alleged evidence the flag was created on is not available therefore the flag should not exist either. I don't think this community will ever reach consensus on anything :PI wonder what the community consensus is on this. My opinion: if an Active Flag doesn't have a valid Reference topic anymore, someone should create one, create a new Flag, and the current Flag supporters should stop supporting the old Flag and start supporting the new Flag. I think that's the proper way to use the Flag system, but it's a lot of work. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on November 12, 2019, 03:57:52 PM Surely if a flag exists for a thread that no longer exists it means the alleged evidence the flag was created on is not available therefore the flag should not exist either. I wonder what the community consensus is on this. I dislike the whole idea of forcing a reference to point to a thread (can't point to a specific post or to an archive) and requiring it to not be self-modded etc but then it still allows the thread to be deleted, locked, or the contents to be completely replaced etc. If anything it should require an immutable archive link, or better yet - don't impose any specific requirements that can't be enforced anyway. But as it stands now, we shouldn't invalidate flags if the reference is removed. A scammer might trick moderators into deleting a thread and apparently moderators can't or won't check if it's used for a flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on November 12, 2019, 04:40:01 PM But as it stands now, we shouldn't invalidate flags if the reference is removed. A scammer might trick moderators into deleting a thread and apparently moderators can't or won't check if it's used for a flag. I don't like the idea of a flag that doesn't have a reference thread, maybe theymos can implement a little indicator near the "delete" button that informs moderators if the thread has been used as reference for a flag. That would at least warn a moderator if the person reporting the thread is the subject of the flag, there may be an effort to manipulate the system. I don't think anyone is missing those reference threads started by korner, but why did they all get deleted? Was it due to being banned? I thought that only happened if the account was nuked, but he still has many posts. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 12, 2019, 05:26:03 PM Surely if a flag exists for a thread that no longer exists it means the alleged evidence the flag was created on is not available therefore the flag should not exist either. I wonder what the community consensus is on this. I dislike the whole idea of forcing a reference to point to a thread (can't point to a specific post or to an archive) and requiring it to not be self-modded etc but then it still allows the thread to be deleted, locked, or the contents to be completely replaced etc. If anything it should require an immutable archive link, or better yet - don't impose any specific requirements that can't be enforced anyway. But as it stands now, we shouldn't invalidate flags if the reference is removed. A scammer might trick moderators into deleting a thread and apparently moderators can't or won't check if it's used for a flag. You have a point but in your opinion what is the best or most appropriate manner to handle the issue? What if the flag reference is the thread OP and both the flag and thread were created by the same person? Flags are an important part of the forum set up but scammers can and definitely have abused it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on November 12, 2019, 05:59:50 PM I don't think anyone is missing those reference threads started by korner, but why did they all get deleted? Was it due to being banned? I thought that only happened if the account was nuked, but he still has many posts. Some threads were created by alts that got nuked, some were just zero-value garbage. I think I reported the last one that was on the Off Topic board and it said "flag 123". Literally that's all it had in it - the number of the flag. You have a point but in your opinion what is the best or most appropriate manner to handle the issue? What if the flag reference is the thread OP and both the flag and thread were created by the same person? Flags are an important part of the forum set up but scammers can and definitely have abused it. Legit flag creators should do the same thing we used to do with red trust references before flags came along - archive all valuable evidence. Flag abusers will get their flags opposed anyway so there is no big difference if their references are valid or not. I wouldn't go overboard with any special rules on this. The flag system is convoluted enough. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on November 12, 2019, 06:39:03 PM You have a point but in your opinion what is the best or most appropriate manner to handle the issue? What if the flag reference is the thread OP and both the flag and thread were created by the same person? Flags are an important part of the forum set up but scammers can and definitely have abused it. Legit flag creators should do the same thing we used to do with red trust references before flags came along - archive all valuable evidence. Flag abusers will get their flags opposed anyway so there is no big difference if their references are valid or not. I wouldn't go overboard with any special rules on this. The flag system is convoluted enough. My post was alluding more so towards Flag abusers. I guess you are right, if they abuse the system with Flags they will get opposed but it still does not stop it being a nuisance. Maybe trying to modify the Flag system at this time is not ideal but some of those factors that were taken in to consideration at time of its release might be considered if it is overhauled in future. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on November 13, 2019, 03:47:58 PM Hi, i am asking support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=976
TradePlus used stock photos for their team members. Their explanation of the issue is interesting, despite using those photos on their website and in the whitepaper. photos had to be taken from free stock photos, stock photography uses the same models we never said ever this our team phots buddy get your facts right Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: The Cryptovator on November 20, 2019, 05:56:10 PM PayPal scammer with locked thread, please support/oppose red flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=938 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=938)
Here is the scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197475.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197475.0) Evidence is quite reasonable to me. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on November 23, 2019, 10:36:23 AM Please take a look at this flag and tell me whether or not you believe it is correct:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1002 (Now I'm only one flag behind Veleor for Most Inactive Flags.) BTW, our perfect-trading quant shop / hedge fund boy wonder is costing his "customers" (not sure if he actually has any) more money than they are making after his advertised fees. OP still never admitted to lying about having a bankroll of 800 BTC, but that's for another flag, this one, to be exact: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=752 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on November 23, 2019, 10:39:48 AM Please take a look at this flag and tell me whether or not you believe it is correct: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1002 Opposed and tagged the creator. (Now I'm only one flag behind Veleor for Most Inactive Flags.) Unfortunately I am the record holder of bitcointalk in most inactive flags. ;D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on December 18, 2019, 01:35:40 PM I'm going to plant my previous Flags here if that's OK?
...will update with others later. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on December 18, 2019, 01:50:08 PM I'm going to plant my previous Flags here if that's OK? Of course :) See Personal Trust Flag viewer for Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html) for all of them.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on December 18, 2019, 01:53:31 PM I'm going to plant my previous Flags here if that's OK? Of course :) See Personal Trust Flag viewer for Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html) for all of them.*Sweet* Thanks for the list! (am redoing my signature) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2019, 02:35:30 AM Please oppose this frivolous "written contract" flag raised against mosprognoz by the Bitcoin SV troll:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085 Edit - another one against Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on December 19, 2019, 02:57:55 AM Please oppose this frivolous "written contract" flag raised against mosprognoz by the Bitcoin SV troll: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085 Edit - another one against Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086 This korner guy has his banned hand in a lot of pies. I know this isn't the right thread for this subject, but we need to see what we can do to get his flood of new alts banned for ban evasion (the ones impersonating people commenting in the SV thread -- you have one now too, named "suchpool"). Banning the Bitcoin SV account would also be nice. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Bitcoin SV on December 19, 2019, 02:58:08 AM Please support this flags against mosprognoz and lauda
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085;support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086;support Thanks for all supporters Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on December 19, 2019, 06:58:22 AM Please oppose this frivolous "written contract" flag raised against mosprognoz by the Bitcoin SV troll: He's been busy: he raised all 3 possible Flags against 3 users:Quote 2019-12-19 Thu 03.18h And that's Flag abuse by the very definition of it!source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/208.html) 1085 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html). 1086 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html). 1087 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1087) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1088 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1088) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1089 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1089) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1090 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1090) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1091 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1091) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1092 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1092) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. 1093 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1093) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nobody. I've opposed all 9 Flags. I know this isn't the right thread for this subject Then please open a new topic :PQuote Banning the Bitcoin SV account would also be nice. I haven't really followed the whole thread about it, but from what I've seen it's about having an "unpopular opinion", and people don't get banned for that.Theymos Opposed the Flag against Bitcoin SV: Quote 40 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40) Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) flagged Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0)). Supported by Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), Iamtutut (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1855426.html), GeoRW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2157.html), korner (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1096223.html). Opposed by theymos (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/35.html), jbreher (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/28719.html), malevolent (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/23092.html), chimk (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1202061.html), CryptopreneurBrainboss (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1052091.html), Quickseller (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/358020.html), peloso (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/81995.html), MirkoIta (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/62565.html), hv_ (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/711260.html), HardFireMiner (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1014868.html), sirsplashalot (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1093610.html), williamuk (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1017117.html), actisstupidname (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1794966.html), breign (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2466348.html). Bans are for breaking forum rules, and (hopefully!) nothing else.Please support this flags against mosprognoz and lauda You're free to ask for Flag Support here, but you kinda lost credibility when you created all Flags the system allowed you to create.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on December 19, 2019, 07:03:34 AM ^^^
Thanks for the excellent summary; opposed the ones I hadn't gotten around to yet. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on December 19, 2019, 02:20:10 PM Please oppose this frivolous "written contract" flag raised against mosprognoz by the Bitcoin SV troll: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085 Edit - another one against Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086 Opposed both of them and thanks to everyone who opposed them too. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on December 19, 2019, 02:48:49 PM Opposed both of them and thanks to everyone who opposed them too. You have 10 unsupported Flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags) already!Just a thought: shouldn't Flags with Insufficient support have a more neutral color than the "normal" Flag colors? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: mosprognoz on December 19, 2019, 03:04:47 PM Opposed both of them and thanks to everyone who opposed them too. You have 10 unsupported Flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags) already!Just a thought: shouldn't Flags with Insufficient support have a more neutral color than the "normal" Flag colors? Yes ! Unfortunately I am the record holder of bitcointalk in most inactive flags. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TheUltraElite on December 19, 2019, 03:16:15 PM I think I should also post a flag that was made against me some time back and it has zero credibility from the reference.
However feel free to support or oppose it whichever you feel is right based on what has been linked. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=878630;page=iflags Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on December 19, 2019, 04:10:40 PM Opposed both of them and thanks to everyone who opposed them too. You have 10 unsupported Flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569;page=iflags) already!10? That's simply astounding. I will have to up my game as I currently only have 5. Just a thought: shouldn't Flags with Insufficient support have a more neutral color than the "normal" Flag colors? Yes, definitely. It should be a grey color as opposed to yellow or red. That's one of the great things about this community: I don't even have to oppose the flags against me and they would still be inactive. Most people are pretty keen on preventing flag injustices by the handful that are committed to introducing them. Also partly in thanks to this thread, I imagine. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on December 19, 2019, 05:20:32 PM Please support this flags against mosprognoz and lauda https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085;support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086;support Thanks for all supporters You give us only support options with this link, sorry mate but I must check first at all. btw. after recheck I'm going to oppose all. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on December 19, 2019, 11:29:59 PM I think I should also post a flag that was made against me some time back and it has zero credibility from the reference. However feel free to support or oppose it whichever you feel is right based on what has been linked. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=878630;page=iflags I likewise have two flags against me, feel free to support or oppose them as you wish. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=702 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=970 (Thanks TUE for the idea) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on December 23, 2019, 02:08:19 PM Dronair, scam project with fake team and plagiarized whitepaper that I reported week ago made new Ann and bounty thread with new account so I am asking for flag support
Flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1101 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on January 01, 2020, 10:36:04 AM Hi, I am asking support for another flag, against OP of Leedcoin, project that plagiarized one older scam, Vulcoin
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1127 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on January 07, 2020, 04:28:20 PM Up to 8 flags against me now.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618;page=iflags 4 of them are from the same person... At what point does flag abuse become ban-worthy? I guess never. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 07, 2020, 04:36:56 PM At what point does flag abuse become ban-worthy? I guess never. Flag abusers are damaging their own credibility, so assuming the Trust system works how it should, they shouldn't ever reach DT.Nobody ever tried to Flag me! Being conservataive with negative feedback has it's perks :D Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: The Cryptovator on January 08, 2020, 05:58:53 AM Stupid Bitcoin SV even don't know how work flag system. It doesn't necessary to open multiple flags for same reason. You might open just single flag for single reason. Seems they have open multiple flags against me.
Here is flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags) Nobody ever tried to Flag me! Leave a negative feedback to Bitcoin SV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2371095), then your dream will filled (IMO).Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: psycodad on January 08, 2020, 06:20:00 AM Stupid Bitcoin SV even don't know how work flag system. It doesn't necessary to open multiple flags for same reason. You might open just single flag for single reason. Seems they have open multiple flags against me. Here is flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags) Nobody ever tried to Flag me! Leave a negative feedback to Bitcoin SV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2371095), then your dream will filled (IMO).Opposed all of them, now waiting for the incoming red tags and flags - I wear them with proud, like the one from Hatch Support. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on January 08, 2020, 06:29:24 AM Stupid Bitcoin SV even don't know how work flag system. It doesn't necessary to open multiple flags for same reason. You might open just single flag for single reason. Seems they have open multiple flags against me. Here is flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags) Nobody ever tried to Flag me! Leave a negative feedback to Bitcoin SV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2371095), then your dream will filled (IMO).Opposed all of them, now waiting for the incoming red tags and flags - I wear them with proud, like the one from Hatch Support. He just left 62 frivolous flags, most people got 3. They are flag #s 1137 - 1199. I opposed all of them. Flag abusers are damaging their own credibility, so assuming the Trust system works how it should, they shouldn't ever reach DT. This is just ridiculous, though. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on January 08, 2020, 06:34:06 AM Stupid Bitcoin SV even don't know how work flag system. It doesn't necessary to open multiple flags for same reason. You might open just single flag for single reason. Seems they have open multiple flags against me. Here is flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983;page=iflags) Nobody ever tried to Flag me! Leave a negative feedback to Bitcoin SV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2371095), then your dream will filled (IMO).I have left negative trust and opposed the flags. The user in question seems to be suffering from delusions of grandeur probably due to some form of serious psychological trauma. Tragic really. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SockyMcSockFace on January 08, 2020, 09:14:05 AM Stupid Bitcoin SV even don't know how work flag system. It doesn't necessary to open multiple flags for same reason. Not only is it not necessary, it is against the rules. ::)It seems I have "won" 3 flags. If only this was a game of "Capture The Flag"! :P All these flags link to the same (locked) post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0) in "off-topic". Which obviously has no facts or evidence of anything. And apparently I am a "defamator, troll". ::) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2020, 10:33:54 AM He just left 62 frivolous flags, most people got 3. They are flag #s 1137 - 1199. I opposed all of them. I'll post a list after finishing my Flag viewer's update.The user in question seems to be suffering from delusions of grandeur probably due to some form of serious psychological trauma. Tragic really. I don't think so, I think he's looking for attention, and that's working out very well for him!Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on January 08, 2020, 11:01:21 AM He just left 62 frivolous flags, most people got 3. They are flag #s 1137 - 1199. I opposed all of them. Flag abusers are damaging their own credibility, so assuming the Trust system works how it should, they shouldn't ever reach DT. This is just ridiculous, though. Ridiculous, yes. That’s the point: Fit subject for ridicule (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215743.msg53550640#msg53550640). Thus, “damaging their own credibility”. ’Tis the fool who loses his cool in a public dispute. Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on January 08, 2020, 11:18:23 AM The user in question seems to be suffering from delusions of grandeur probably due to some form of serious psychological trauma. Tragic really. I don't think so, I think he's looking for attention, and that's working out very well for him!I know that in some circles it is widely agreed that any form of publicity is good for business but is he actually benefiting from this conduct outside the forum? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2020, 12:49:22 PM He just left 62 frivolous flags, most people got 3. They are flag #s 1137 - 1199. I opposed all of them. I'll post a list after finishing my Flag viewer's update.So here's a complete list of all Flags created by Bitcoin SV: Quote 2020-01-08 Wed 12.08h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/230.html) 1085 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1085) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by Vod (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/30747.html), gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), TheUltraElite (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/878630.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1086 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1086) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), Patatas (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/385855.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TheUltraElite (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/878630.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html), Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html), IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1087 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1087) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), stompix (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/164749.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1088 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1088) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mosprognoz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1094569.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), stompix (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/164749.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1089 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1089) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), Patatas (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/385855.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1090 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1090) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Lauda (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/101872.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), Patatas (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/385855.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1091 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1091) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1092 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1092) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1093 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1093) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2460025.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by gmaxwell (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/11425.html), Foxpup (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/55384.html), suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), examplens (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/314792.html), nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1104 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1104) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185578.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1105 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1105) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185578.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1106 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1106) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185578.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1132 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1132) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), morvillz7z (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1825672.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1133 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1133) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), morvillz7z (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1825672.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1134 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1134) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), teeGUMES (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/307884.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html), morvillz7z (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1825672.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1137 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1137) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1138 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1138) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1139 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1139) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1140 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1140) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged marlboroza (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/787736.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105765.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1141 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1141) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged marlboroza (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/787736.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105765.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1142 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1142) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged marlboroza (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/787736.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105765.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1143 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1143) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1144 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1144) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1145 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1145) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), Coolcryptovator (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1980983.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1146 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1146) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145975.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1147 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1147) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145975.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1148 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1148) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145975.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1149 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1149) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mindrust (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/176777.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158894.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1150 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1150) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mindrust (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/176777.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158894.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1151 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1151) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged mindrust (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/176777.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158894.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** This is an automated comment (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.msg53479719#msg53479719): Flags 295 and 1151 are duplicates. 1152 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1152) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184720.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1153 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1153) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184720.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1154 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1154) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DireWolfM14 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2003859.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184720.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1155 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1155) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged franckuestein (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/225121.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1156 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1156) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged franckuestein (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/225121.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1157 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1157) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged franckuestein (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/225121.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1158 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1158) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Hueristic (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/198573.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1159 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1159) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Hueristic (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/198573.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1160 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1160) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Hueristic (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/198573.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1161 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1161) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1162 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1162) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1163 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1163) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101152.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1164 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1164) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117829.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1165 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1165) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117829.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1166 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1166) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Last of the V8s (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/479624.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117829.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** This is an automated comment (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.msg53479719#msg53479719): Flags 365 and 1166 are duplicates. 1167 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1167) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged gembitz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/761729.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1168 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1168) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged gembitz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/761729.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1169 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1169) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged gembitz (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/761729.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** This is an automated comment (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.msg53479719#msg53479719): Flags 108 and 1169 are duplicates. 1170 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1170) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LBX (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/842041.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4395974.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1171 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1171) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LBX (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/842041.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4395974.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), JSRAW (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1210969.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2020, 12:49:31 PM Quote 1172 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1172) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged LBX (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/842041.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4395974.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1173 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1173) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged 1174 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1174) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged 1175 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1175) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged 1176 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1176) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged shinohai (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/717141.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1177 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1177) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged shinohai (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/717141.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1178 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1178) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged shinohai (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/717141.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1179 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1179) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1180 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1180) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1181 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1181) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged dragonvslinux (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1170966.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1182 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1182) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged blurryeyed (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/885996.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1183 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1183) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged blurryeyed (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/885996.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1184 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1184) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged blurryeyed (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/885996.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html)[/size]. 1185 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1185) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100018.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1186 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1186) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100018.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1187 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1187) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged Timelord2067 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/131361.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100018.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1188 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1188) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203881.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1189 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1189) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203881.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1190 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1190) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged IconFirm (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/841288.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203881.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1191 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1191) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged MagicByt3 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2269783.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1192 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1192) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged MagicByt3 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2269783.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1193 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1193) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged MagicByt3 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2269783.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1194 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1194) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210) commented (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.0): Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215743.0 1195 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1195) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210) commented (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.0): Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215743.0 1196 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1196) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), TMAN (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/98986.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). *** nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210) commented (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193695.0): Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215743.0 1197 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1197) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DooMAD (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/175361.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1198 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1198) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DooMAD (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/175361.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). 1199 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1199) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged DooMAD (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/175361.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html), o_e_l_e_o (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1188543.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html). 1201 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1201) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html)[/size]. 1202 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1202) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html)[/size]. 1203 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1203) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged JollyGood (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1016855.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html)[/size]. 1204 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1204) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html)[/size]. 1205 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1205) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html)[/size]. 1206 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1206) Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html) flagged SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215709.0)). Supported by Bitcoin SV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2371095.html). Opposed by suchmoon (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/234771.html), psycodad (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/430390.html), nullius (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/976210.html), SockyMcSockFace (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2731533.html). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: psycodad on January 08, 2020, 02:03:30 PM /me needs a script to auto-oppose, now that was quite a job.
I take my responsibility and right of supporting or opposing flags quite serious, but for Bitcoin SV I made an exception after the fifth or sixth flag he raised without any real evidence posted. If this is not blatant abuse of the flag system, I'd be interested to hear what then defines abuse of the flag system. I hope theymos or another mod takes proper action on him. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on January 08, 2020, 03:23:42 PM /me needs a script to auto-oppose, now that was quite a job. I take my responsibility and right of supporting or opposing flags quite serious, but for Bitcoin SV I made an exception after the fifth or sixth flag he raised without any real evidence posted. If this is not blatant abuse of the flag system, I'd be interested to hear what then defines abuse of the flag system. I hope theymos or another mod takes proper action on him. Abuse of the flag system is rampant and has been going on far too long unfortunately, I hope some action is taken to put an end to stop those that misuse the system. Look at that Bitcoin SV user, he is showing signs of someone suffering from a variety of mental issues. Seriously. It is unbelievable the amount of flags he created and attached fake reasons for validity. Why is he so concerned about what users in this forum think about Bitcoin SV anyway? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on January 08, 2020, 03:38:09 PM Thanks, Loyce! Useful.
/me needs a script to auto-oppose, now that was quite a job. I take my responsibility and right of supporting or opposing flags quite serious, but for Bitcoin SV I made an exception after the fifth or sixth flag he raised without any real evidence posted. This raises two important points: In my case, I only got through a fraction of the flags thus far. If BSV raised an abusive flag against you, and I didn’t yet oppose it, it means nothing except that I could only do so much repetitive clicking in one bout. Thanks to nutildah, psycodad, and SockyMcSockFace for having had the stamina to slog through the whole list! I will continue opposing these a few at a time; and yes, I would in this rare case apply a script. While I was opposing BSV flags, I saw many other inactive flags which are probably wrong, which occurred in my absence. I say “probably wrong” because they are against people I’d be more or less inclined to trust, and/or were opposed by people I trust. It was a distraction that I ultimately just ignored, because I would need to do at least a cursory investigation in each case to reach my independent conclusion. I observe this to underscore what psycodad said, “I take my responsibility and right of supporting or opposing flags quite serious”. If I just ignore an inactive flag against you, it means nothing about you. I know that in some circles it is widely agreed that any form of publicity is good for business but is he actually benefiting from this conduct outside the forum? Sshh. Don’t give him the hint. Far from wanting to ban him, I wish there were a way to force him to stay here if he tries to run away. Here, we have a home advantage insofar as, other than noisy, stupid BSV shills, everybody here knows that he’s a liar. I think the best strategy is containment and examination. Yes, it seems like a waste of time to deal with that mess; but unfortunately, we will need to spend much more time counteracting BSV anyway, on and off this forum. It’s best to start here. Also, restating another way what gmaxwell recently pointed out in another thread, it is also a benefit when BSV supporters speak up. The principle of freedom of speech is often explained in terms of shining a light in dark places. I want to shine a light on BSV, in the manner of a police interrogation lamp. He is losing his cool and lashing out wildly. I want to encourage him to stay here for as long as BSV is a problem in places other than this forum, i.e. as long as the BSV scam exists. This is a much bigger issue than some forum drama. (I also note, we seem to have perpetual drama anyway; it’s better to have drama about an important issue, so we can coalesce and redirect that energy into a bigger effort.) As for any publicity being good publicity, this was recently discussed implicitly in another thread. I thought so, which was why I ignored BSV (the whole scam, not just the user account). I realized that I was wrong, so I stopped ignoring it. The community needs to organize, pay attention to BSV, and go on the offensive. You are questioning whether or not his antics here are helping him in the bigger picture. I am suggesting that we make sure his antics everywhere backfire, starting here. Look at that Bitcoin SV user, he is showing signs of someone suffering from a variety of mental issues. Seriously. PR protip: “Any publicity is good publicity” reaches its limits when you just made everybody see you as crazy. Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2020, 03:53:33 PM While I was opposing BSV flags, I saw many other inactive flags which are probably wrong, which occurred in my absence. I say “probably wrong” because they are against people I’d be more or less inclined to trust, and/or were opposed by people I trust. I wouldn't try to vote on all possible Flags. There's far too many of them, and ideally many different users should all check a few Flags once in a while to make voting more distributed.Quote I observe this to underscore what psycodad said, “I take my responsibility and right of supporting or opposing flags quite serious”. In my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0), I highlight the easy ones to Oppose: duplicate Flags and Flags without valid Reference link :)Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on January 08, 2020, 04:23:43 PM While I was opposing BSV flags, I saw many other inactive flags which are probably wrong, which occurred in my absence. I say “probably wrong” because they are against people I’d be more or less inclined to trust, and/or were opposed by people I trust. I wouldn't try to vote on all possible Flags. There's far too many of them, and ideally many different users should all check a few Flags once in a while to make voting more distributed.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on January 09, 2020, 03:00:25 PM Added a flag for "TrustUSD", which is a blatant ripoff of the "TrueUSD" stablecoin, except their token is neither stable nor backed by assets. They have a plagiarized white paper and their logo is almost an exact copy of the TrueUSD logo.
Flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1214 ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205460 Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213446 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Nandini_crypto on January 09, 2020, 09:09:33 PM I think this is the right topic discussion I am in.
There is a flag created against me for writing the topic Does this tread really deserve the attention it has got? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215242.msg53533405#msg53533405) Flag--> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1213 I would request for justice. I do not find any mistake in the topic I started. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 09, 2020, 09:31:05 PM Flag--> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1213 Someone has created several new accounts just to Support the Flag. I've Opposed it, the Reference thread only shows you've hit a nerve.Title: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: nullius on January 09, 2020, 09:51:16 PM Flag--> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1213 Someone has created several new accounts just to Support the Flag. I've Opposed it, the Reference thread only shows you've hit a nerve.See here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215242.msg53561630#msg53561630); the non-“Brand New” supporters are known alts. Now, I see three new accounts. I have archived their user pages to show that they are/were “Brand New” with 0 posts as of the time when I found them through their support of Flag 1213 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1213):
I will tag them, with reference to this post. Should I flag them? Should they be reported to moderators? What is the forum’s policy on accounts created for the purpose of supporting/opposing flags? Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: AB de Royse777 on January 09, 2020, 10:14:40 PM What is the forum’s policy on accounts created for the purpose of supporting/opposing flags? Supporting or opposing a flag from a non-DT account does not carry much weight. So we all should be fine with it. Talking about this flag from the user The-Devil seems very uninformed step. And it's not unexpected as per my opinion since that use is fairly new to the forum affairs.I will be opposing this flag too. Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: nullius on January 09, 2020, 10:51:46 PM Supporting or opposing a flag from a non-DT account does not carry much weight. So we all should be fine with it. Note the word “attempted” in the subject. I know full well that it carries no weight, but it’s obscenely abusive. I am not “fine with it”. It is a Sibyl attack, and it is spam of the trust system. The theoretical futility of the act does not alter this. Moreover, it did apparently scare the newbie who apparently does not know he’s in no danger. Please see above. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg53564336#msg53564336) If you dig way back on my trust page, you will see negative sent feedback explaining that I had previously intended to send it, but I was afraid to when I was a newbie—for exactly this reason. Against a newbie, false flags or tags are an intimidation tactic (though the retaliatory flags against PrimeNumber7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1212) and now Lauda (!) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1216) are just plain stupid). I think it really boils down to the question of whether the forum’s administration wants to let such useless Sibyls lie dormant indefinitely, or clean them up as the trash they are. As a practical matter, I don’t have a strong opinion on which way they should handle this; but the question is worth broaching. I will be opposing this flag too. Good idea: You’re not “fine with it”. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on January 10, 2020, 03:55:14 AM I wouldn't try to vote on all possible Flags. There's far too many of them, and ideally many different users should all check a few Flags once in a while to make voting more distributed. I would like to have a one-click "advanced" option to oppose obviously frivolous flags, like the ones create by korner sockpuppets. It doesn't have to be all flags by a certain user but at least an option to select multiple ones easily and and then oppose all selected. The troll flags are basically DOSing the trust system since the effort to create them is so much lower than the combined effort of multiple users trying to oppose them. Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: AB de Royse777 on January 10, 2020, 04:21:47 AM Note the word “attempted” in the subject. Noted. It's a great idea to edit the response title that suits the needs.Quote I know full well that it carries no weight I too was wondering how it's not known by a user like you (seems to have good grasp than most of the members in the forum). Good thing is that I was not wrong.Quote but it’s obscenely abusive. I am not “fine with it”. It is a Sibyl attack, and it is spam of the trust system. Absolutely and this is not the only user in the system. We have game-protect and many other users who do constant abuse of trust feedback system. And you already realized that I too is not fine with it.Quote The theoretical futility of the act does not alter this. Fact.Quote the retaliatory flags against PrimeNumber7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1212) and now Lauda (!) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1216) are just plain stupid Yes and it seems the flags created by the user The-Devil are very wrong after all and according to your language, "I am not fine with it" in other words, I oppose the flags created against the users PrimeNumber7 and Lauda.Quote I think it really boils down to the question of whether the forum’s administration wants to let such useless Sibyls lie dormant indefinitely, or clean them up as the trash they are. As a practical matter, I don’t have a strong opinion on which way they should handle this; but the question is worth broaching. I too have not much strong opinion but if I someone asks me while I am drinking in the pub on a nice evening with an intend to start a conversation with me then I would say, yeah put some restrictions (possibly allow a minimum rank) for users before they are able Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: suchmoon on January 10, 2020, 04:30:55 AM I too have not much strong opinion but if I someone asks me while I am drinking in the pub on a nice evening with an intend to start a conversation with me then I would say, yeah put some restrictions (possibly allow a minimum rank) for users before they are able to create flags and also to vote. This will eliminate the brand new fake accounts to abuse with false support or oppose in a flag. For voting - maybe. For creating a flag - no. Scammed newbies need to be able to create flags. It would be nice to have a limit on how many flags they can create but on the other hand Bitcoin SV and other "advanced" sockpuppets are able to farm merits fairly easily so that wouldn't be much of an impediment for them anyway. Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: AB de Royse777 on January 10, 2020, 04:41:27 AM For voting - maybe. For creating a flag - no. Scammed newbies need to be able to create flags. It would be nice to have a limit on how many flags they can create When you (In this case it seems that the person is me) are drinking on a lazy day in the local pub and if you already have drunk a lot then slip of tongue (better to say fingers on the keys) like this (restricting to create flags) is acceptable. What I mean by this is that you have a valid point here and I have edited my last post after seeing your response :-)Quote but on the other hand Bitcoin SV and other "advanced" sockpuppets are able to farm merits fairly easily so that wouldn't be much of an impediment for them anyway. True but as usual someone will spot it and will bring it to our attention.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on January 10, 2020, 04:53:34 AM True but as usual someone will spot it and will bring it to our attention. If this happens on larger scale later in the future, I don't think it would be notified or handled always. Even opposing that number of abusive flags is not always handy. Only theymos could handle this at light speed and he should now. Btw, the thread title changing trick make it more confusing, please stop. Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: LoyceV on January 10, 2020, 09:00:18 AM I will tag them, with reference to this post. Should I flag them? Should they be reported to moderators? What is the forum’s policy on accounts created for the purpose of supporting/opposing flags? I don't think there is a forum policy for this. My personal policy is they're not important enough to care.As long as invalid Flags are inactive, the system works just fine :) Title: Re: What is the policy on Sibyl accounts made for attempted flag manipulation? Post by: Timelord2067 on January 10, 2020, 09:22:08 AM What is the forum’s policy on accounts created for the purpose of supporting/opposing flags? That's where the team of investigators of the Known Alts thread(s) work to expose such shill/sock puppets to identify and tag the alts. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on January 14, 2020, 04:51:17 AM Heads up, a new round of flags created by korner alts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211434.0):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1231 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1232 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1233 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1234 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1235 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1236 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1237 They are all being supported by his other alts. ::) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on January 16, 2020, 07:59:05 AM Please support flag against @BTClover999, OP of Affiliater, scammy project with plagiarized whitepaper that has ICO going on at the moment.
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1250 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: donuts1234 on January 17, 2020, 09:03:01 AM Requesting support for flag started against the user BitGame777 for the scam accusation out laid here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0)
Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 17, 2020, 10:35:29 AM Requesting support for flag started against the user BitGame777 for the scam accusation out laid here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0) Flag supported. See my reasoning here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745040.msg53628639#msg53628639).Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: donuts1234 on January 17, 2020, 03:59:58 PM Requesting support for flag started against the user BitGame777 for the scam accusation out laid here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0) Flag supported. See my reasoning here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745040.msg53628639#msg53628639).Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251) Thanks for supporting the flag, hopefully another person chips and and maybe then they will decide to pay me out. But it seems like without any detriment to them they seem fine just launching ad hominem attacks and resolving nothing. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on January 17, 2020, 05:06:20 PM Requesting support for flag started against the user BitGame777 for the scam accusation out laid here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218218.0) Flag supported. See my reasoning here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745040.msg53628639#msg53628639).Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1251) Thanks for supporting the flag, hopefully another person chips and and maybe then they will decide to pay me out. But it seems like without any detriment to them they seem fine just launching ad hominem attacks and resolving nothing. I supported This flag after reading all about this case. The flag is now active. Idk if they want to pay you because of the flag, but this is not the proper way to do any business. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on January 20, 2020, 08:17:16 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260
Because of the transgressions and refusal to admit wrong and stop (he has yet to stop). I'd also recommend: Quote ~Agrawas Apparently the user has included andulolika (in my opinion!) solely because he received a positive rating off of him. However, I have notified the user and am waiting for feedback on why they have done this. Maybe I am wrong.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rohan Kotkar on January 20, 2020, 12:05:07 PM Requesting flag support here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1223
Active accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5216622.0 I don't exactly know if my accusations are appropriate, as I can't see any flag support in my favour. I just want to make sure whether I did anything wrong or is it worth for the cleanliness (anti-scam movement) of the forum. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on January 22, 2020, 07:21:34 PM Requesting flag support against @Litbinex Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1267
Litbinex scam accusation topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219456.0 Litbinex is new exchange, but behind it is the Littradex exchange that was exposed by @tvplus006 for plagiarizing Binance whitepaper. Here is Littradex scam accusation topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184130.0 Litbinex took over Littradex social media channels, and they are listing their LTB tokens on bunch of shady exchanges like Coinsbit and P2PB2B. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 10:30:05 AM There's another Flag spammer (now nuked):
Quote 2020-01-23 Thu 03.18h Most of these Flags are easy to oppose without looking into them: the Reference topic doesn't exist.source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/246.html) 1314 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1314) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged witcher_sense (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1433865.html) (type 3, 1313 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1313) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged stompix (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/164749.html) (type 1, 1312 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1312) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged stompix (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/164749.html) (type 2, 1311 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1311) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged stompix (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/164749.html) (type 3, 1310 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1310) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged peloso (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/81995.html) (type 1, 1309 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1309) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged peloso (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/81995.html) (type 2, 1308 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1308) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged peloso (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/81995.html) (type 3, 1307 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1307) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Vadi2323 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/399366.html) (type 1, 1306 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1306) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Vadi2323 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/399366.html) (type 2, 1305 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1305) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Vadi2323 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/399366.html) (type 3, 1304 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1304) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar_home (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2719244.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1303 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1303) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar_home (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2719244.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1302 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1302) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar_home (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2719244.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1301 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1301) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/23324.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1300 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1300) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/23324.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1299 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1299) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Balthazar (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/23324.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217.0)). Supported by VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html). Opposed by nobody. 1298 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1298) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 1, 1297 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1297) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 2, 1296 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1296) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged nutildah (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/317618.html) (type 3, 1295 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1295) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Cyrus (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/78147.html) (type 1, 1294 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1294) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Cyrus (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/78147.html) (type 2, 1293 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1293) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Cyrus (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/78147.html) (type 3, 1292 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1292) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged xandry (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/382413.html) (type 1, 1291 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1291) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged xandry (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/382413.html) (type 2, 1290 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1290) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged xandry (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/382413.html) (type 3, 1289 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1289) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged kzv (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/662400.html) (type 2, 1288 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1288) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged StartupAnalyst (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2254935.html) (type 1, 1287 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1287) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged FontSeli (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2221613.html) (type 2, 1286 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1286) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged StartupAnalyst (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2254935.html) (type 3, 1285 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1285) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 1, 1284 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1284) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged taikuri13 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1855828.html) (type 2, 1283 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1283) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged witcher_sense (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1433865.html) (type 2, 1282 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1282) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged StartupAnalyst (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2254935.html) (type 2, 1281 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1281) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 2, 1280 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1280) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Veleor (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1177936.html) (type 3, 1279 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1279) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged FontSeli (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2221613.html) (type 3, 1278 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1278) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged kzv (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/662400.html) (type 3, 1277 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1277) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Ratimov (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2627711.html) (type 1, 1276 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1276) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Ratimov (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2627711.html) (type 2, 1275 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1275) VIVA-E (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2677613.html) flagged Ratimov (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2627711.html) (type 3, Question: should I add direct links to "Support" or "Oppose" Flags on my Trust Flag viewer? Pros: This makes it much faster to Oppose all Flags from a Flag spammer. Cons: That would mean you have to trust me for creating the correct link. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on January 23, 2020, 10:45:43 AM Question[/b]: should I add direct links to "Support" or "Oppose" Flags on my Trust Flag viewer? Pros: This makes it much faster to Oppose all Flags from a Flag spammer. Cons: That would mean you have to trust me for creating the correct link. Yes, of course, that would make it much easier to support/oppose, especially when reference topic deleted or does not exist. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 24, 2020, 06:53:45 AM Yes, of course, that would make it much easier to support/oppose, especially when reference topic deleted or does not exist. Done:New: (Support | Oppose) The BBCode for this has a small mistake, that will be fixed tomorrow.Because of Flag spammers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg53680508#msg53680508), I've added quick links to (Support (http://) | Oppose (http://)) Flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on February 12, 2020, 08:01:06 AM Requesting flag support against @michaelcutajar, that is behind FPCC announcement thread
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1370 FPCC is ponzi with fake team member CV, promising big return, and recently they started shilling their Ann thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224051.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: decodx on February 13, 2020, 10:15:30 PM Requesting flag support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1375
Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225641.0 Thanks! Title: Please support Flag #1388 against Come-from-Beyond (IOTA co-founder/promoter) Post by: nullius on February 19, 2020, 03:43:28 PM I request that DT members support Lauda’s flag #1388 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1388) against Come-from-Beyond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=46556), the IOTA co-founder and the principal promoter on this forum of IOTA’s snake oil SCAM (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0). Thank you.
Title: Re: Please support Flag #1388 against Come-from-Beyond (IOTA co-founder/promoter) Post by: mindrust on February 19, 2020, 04:56:54 PM I request that DT members support Lauda’s flag #1388 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1388) against Come-from-Beyond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=46556), the IOTA co-founder and the principal promoter on this forum of IOTA’s snake oil SCAM (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0). Thank you. But theymos said there should be a written contract between the two parties (scammer & victim) ;D Title: Re: Please support Flag #1388 against Come-from-Beyond (IOTA co-founder/promoter) Post by: nullius on February 19, 2020, 05:43:41 PM I request that DT members support Lauda’s flag #1388 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1388) against Come-from-Beyond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=46556), the IOTA co-founder and the principal promoter on this forum of IOTA’s snake oil SCAM (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0). Thank you. But theymos said there should be a written contract between the two parties (scammer & victim) ;D Don’t worry; Flag #1388 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1388) is fully compliant with flag rules. It requires objective evidence of a high risk of losing money. I have provided that evidence, whereupon Lauda saw fit to create a flag. A Type-1 flag does not require violation of an oral or written contract with the person raising the flag. If you believe that the evidence in my scam accusation thread adequately demonstrates that IOTA presents a high risk of losing money, then please consider supporting the flag so that newbies and casual websurfers receive a warning. (Logged-in users above Newbie rank will not see the warning, unfortunately.) I don’t think there can be much of a reasonable question on this point, whereas Lauda quoted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.msg53871607#msg53871607) reporting by no less than IEEE Spectrum two years ago (https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/cryptographers-urge-users-and-researchers-to-abandon-iota-after-leaked-emails) that “multiple prominent security researchers and academic cryptographers... implore investors not to hold the [IOTA] currency”, and I pointed out that they are insecure crypto snake oil who also can and do shut off the network anytime they please. 2. Warning newbies/guests who don't know how to research properly about high-risk people. A newbie-warning flag is active if there are more people supporting such a flag than opposing it. It shows a banner on topics started by the flagged user for guests and for users with less than 7 days of login time. For all users, a "#" is shown next to their trust scores. The flags that may be raised on violation of an oral or written contract are different types of flags: For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created. This is the only thing which causes the "Warning: trade with extreme caution" warning to return. It also triggers a banner similar to the newbie-warning banner which is visible to all users. A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active. My disagreement with some DT members about the proper use of feedback is unrelated to flags. Indeed, I argue for somewhat broader application of negative trust feedback partly on the basis that the flag system has narrow rules, which I respect. Title: Re: Please support Flag #1388 and Flag #1392 against IOTA Post by: nullius on February 20, 2020, 11:47:57 PM I request that DT members support Lauda’s flag #1388 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1388) against Come-from-Beyond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=46556), the IOTA co-founder and the principal promoter on this forum of IOTA’s snake oil SCAM (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0). Thank you. Please also support Lauda’s flag #1392 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1392) against iotatoken (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=574177) (reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.msg53879762#msg53879762) within the same IOTA scam accusation thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0)). Thank you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on February 21, 2020, 12:02:13 PM Requesting flag support against AddmoreMining
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1393 Addmore used fake team member photo, and plagiarized content from 2 sources. Here is the thread from scam accusation board with more info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227258.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: ChiBitCTy on February 23, 2020, 08:04:14 PM NVM
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 27, 2020, 06:37:36 AM Please support flag against Bitcoin Gold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1408.
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 07:37:29 AM Evidence of connection given. Support needed:
Flag on hacker1001101001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1021758): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412. Flag on poochpocket (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=304376) (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413. hacker1001101001", is your alt account / have you ever used the account (in any way or form) under the name: "poochpocket"? Yes, the account is in control of me. I would also like to mention I have never used it for any scamming purpose hence none, me or the other account deserves a tag or an flag.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on February 28, 2020, 07:43:44 AM Support needed: Flag on hacker1001101001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1021758): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412. Flag on poochpocket (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=304376) (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413. More fake flags by the guy with the highest percentage of fake flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 07:44:43 AM Support needed: More fake flags by the guy with the highest percentage of fake flags.Flag on hacker1001101001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1021758): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412. Flag on poochpocket (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=304376) (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on February 28, 2020, 07:52:23 AM If you continue posting lies like that, you are going to create enough references for yourself to be flagged. Those flags are on-point and based on evidence, zero speculation. Some people.. Guy who has created the highest number of fake flags most recent fake flags have been tagged as such: Flag 1220: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser - Flag is therefore invalid. Flag 1412: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as having committed an indictable offence. The accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid. Flag 1413: Accused User poochpocket is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as the accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid. Updated 28/Feb/2020 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 11:57:02 AM Flag on poochpocket (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=304376) (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413. Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 01:07:54 PM Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts. He admitted it himself: Let's make it simple. Here is a question directed at "hacker1001101001". It is a simple yes and no question. "hacker1001101001", is your alt account / have you ever used the account (in any way or form) under the name: "poochpocket"? Yes, the account is in control of me. I would also like to mention I have never used it for any scamming purpose hence none, me or the other account deserves a tag or an flag.If you avoid it or ignore it, then you will leave me no other choice but to post in the investigations section. OP can then cross reference by linking in the first post. You have an line of bad deeds here, you would never be sorry about doxxing someone. So yet I was just more inclined to be honest not afraid of you posting personal info. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 01:36:52 PM Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts. He admitted it himself: After the flag was raised. I have removed the opposition but that's not how flags should be done. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on February 28, 2020, 03:24:46 PM There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts. He admitted it himself:Yes, the account is in control of me. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 03:33:41 PM The Flag is on poochpocket, not on hacker1001101001. I didn't read all the details, but it doesn't seem right hacker1001101001 can confirm this on behalf of poochpocket. Anyone can claim the exact same thing about my account, that doesn't mean it's true. So it shouldn't count as evidence. This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on February 28, 2020, 03:37:05 PM This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all. This wasn't directed at you or any of your claims, I pointed out that "He admitted it himself" doesn't work.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 03:38:37 PM This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all. This wasn't directed at you or any of your claims, I pointed out that "He admitted it himself" doesn't work.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 03:55:58 PM After the flag was raised. I have removed the opposition but that's not how flags should be done. You are right, there should have been something more concrete self-admitting from both accounts.The Flag is on poochpocket, not on hacker1001101001. I didn't read all the details, but it doesn't seem right hacker1001101001 can confirm this on behalf of poochpocket. Anyone can claim the exact same thing about my account, that doesn't mean it's true. So it shouldn't count as evidence. Point taken, both accounts should admit it in order for clarity to prevailIn this case it does, because I am guaranteeing the validity of the evidence. Do you want me to get witnesses and to quote statements for the record? Sigh. If you want, then ask him to post the same confirmation from poochpocket. At that point, after he posts, I would demand you support both flags because of said actions though. Sigh #2. I think that would be the better thing to do so we can all move on from it, surely he would have no problem admitting it again but from his alt-account this time.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 04:39:27 PM In this case it does, because I am guaranteeing the validity of the evidence. Do you want me to get witnesses and to quote statements for the record? Sigh. If you want, then ask him to post the same confirmation from poochpocket. At that point, after he posts, I would demand you support both flags because of said actions though. Sigh #2. I think that would be the better thing to do so we can all move on from it, surely he would have no problem admitting it again but from his alt-account this time.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on February 29, 2020, 02:56:57 AM This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all. Well, you are the guy who in another thread made a threat against me recently to create a flag against me wholly on the belief that my opposing your two false flags constitutes some indiscretion in your mind. But you know what? You wouldn't be the first guy to create a false flag against me. Not even the second or third guy... I already have five false flags created against my u=131361 main and one false flag created against my mobile-alt u=2640757 account. So you Lauda would be the guy in lowly seventh place. That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0) thead - "it's what we''re good at" TM.). Next. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on February 29, 2020, 05:50:37 AM This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all. Well, you are the guy who in another thread made a threat against me recently to create a flag against me wholly on the belief that my opposing your two false flags constitutes some indiscretion in your mind. But you know what? You wouldn't be the first guy to create a false flag against me. Not even the second or third guy... I already have five false flags created against my u=131361 main and one false flag created against my mobile-alt u=2640757 account. So you Lauda would be the guy in lowly seventh place. That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0) thead - "it's what we''re good at" TM.). Next. Title: IOTA flags #1417, #1416, #1392, & #1388 (...etc...) Post by: nullius on February 29, 2020, 01:24:24 PM Update: There are now four flags against those who have been involved in and/or promoting the IOTA scam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.0):
My thanks to tyKiwanuka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1025255) and Gyrsur (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=62358) for bringing forth additional evidence on IOTA-related forum acounts—and of course, to Lauda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227016.msg53891412#post_laud_lauda). [...] What in the name of sanity are you talking about? Have you been drinking or something?That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0) thead - "it's what we''re good at" TM.). Next. I am guessing that maybe he means this: Mind your manners, child. nullius is another one of those brain dead shill accounts that's been brought back to life. Instead of making contact for their concern about a post of mine, they went on a stumbling rant about the post. Very brain dead nullius - the shill account. Why is my nick in this thread? Why is my alt's nick in this thread? “LOL.” If you even deign to notice. (...etc... (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218451.0)) I would simply ignore it as off-topic. Don’t you/I/your other alts have important things to do? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on March 01, 2020, 12:29:30 AM FUD FUD It's funny how the pair of you seem to have gotten yourselves into a frenzy very recently (around the same time) I wonder if it has anything to do with some alts that were tagged and bagged around the same time? (or, to keep it on topic, some flags that were planted). Loosing your source of extra income must be hurting you two guys. (Where are your Gangs when you need them to come to your defence I wonder?) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on March 06, 2020, 10:34:49 AM Requesting support for a flag against the Coinsbit exchange here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1434 They've had a huge number of complaints for several months, and some of them are from users locked out of their funds, which have been rolling in to the forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185065.msg53901574#msg53901574). Here's a couple summaries of their problems: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195285.msg53855110#msg53855110 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195285.msg53974810#msg53974810 These are from the thread referenced by the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on March 06, 2020, 12:31:22 PM I added support. The coinsbit scammers have been scamming users for a long time just as p2pb2b and exrates have been doing.
Their thread is still being pumped to the maximum by their sock-puppet accounts. Requesting support for a flag against the Coinsbit exchange here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1434 They've had a huge number of complaints for several months, and some of them are from users locked out of their funds, which have been rolling in to the forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185065.msg53901574#msg53901574). Here's a couple summaries of their problems: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195285.msg53855110#msg53855110 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195285.msg53974810#msg53974810 These are from the thread referenced by the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: efialtis on March 06, 2020, 07:12:51 PM Hey guys,
I am requesting support for a flag against Kawbet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1435 Reference thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5230966.0 They are basically part of the shadiest gambling group around... 1xbet/1xbit/favbet and many more... Worst thing: They are even running a signature campaign! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on March 18, 2020, 06:49:05 PM Hello all, I'm requesting support for this flag against theyoungmillionaire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180530) for defaulting on a loan. I posted a scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54053650#msg54053650) against him, you'll find it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54053650#msg54053650 Type 3 flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1470 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on March 18, 2020, 10:58:39 PM Flag supported.
It is not nice when you give out loans to people and they betray your trust. I hope he returns your funds to you with an apology and explanation. Hello all, I'm requesting support for this flag against theyoungmillionaire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180530) for defaulting on a loan. I posted a scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54053650#msg54053650) against him, you'll find it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54053650#msg54053650 Type 3 flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1470 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: efialtis on March 20, 2020, 09:58:20 AM Hey there,
I am requesting support for this flag against Bitcoin_chaser: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1475 They are promoting scammers such as 1xbit, bitstarz, kawbet. Thanks! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: efialtis on March 24, 2020, 08:27:11 PM Hey,
I am requesting support for a flag against Pnxbet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1489 Reference thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235201 Pnxbet are connected with Kawbet and 1xbet/1xbit. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on April 02, 2020, 07:54:36 PM Here is the flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1506
It is in relation to this thread regarding MarketPeak using sock-puppets/paid shills to flood their thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236117.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on April 05, 2020, 05:50:09 PM Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on April 05, 2020, 05:57:50 PM Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag. The following statement is an unbased lie and I request more support for the flag. Funny how most of the people opposing it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me, not relevant to your flag or you. ;Dhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on April 05, 2020, 06:00:27 PM Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag. The following statement is an unbased lie and I request more support for the flag. Funny how most of the people opposing it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me, not relevant to your flag or you. ;Dhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 You have an history of creating shitty flags out there. Go through yourself. Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on April 06, 2020, 05:37:54 AM Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag. The following statement is an unbased lie and I request more support for the flag. Funny how most of the people opposing it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me, not relevant to your flag or you. ;Dhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on April 06, 2020, 06:59:51 AM Requesting opposition for the unwarrant flag by Lauda, due to me not actively involved in the accusations made in the linked thread and not having any history of anyone being at high risk of losing money with me. I even think it is not a proper use of flag. The following statement is an unbased lie and I request more support for the flag. Funny how most of the people opposing it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me, not relevant to your flag or you. ;Dhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place. 2 PMs explaining I not willing to engage in similar beheviour again and with my reasons to get stuck into it back then. And I am harrsing a person who finds fun in getting hands on others personal info, classic. Yet that doesn't change the fact that most of your flags are baseless and indicate no possible high risks. Asking for opposition from who can judge it without double standards unlike you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on April 06, 2020, 07:16:57 AM 2 PMs explaining I not willing to engage in similar beheviour again and with my reasons to get stuck into it back then. And I am harrsing a person who finds fun in getting hands on others personal info, classic. Bullshit. 2 PMs whining i.e. lying how you are going to behave, which I declined after which you started attacking and harassing me. You are the very definition of a degenerate evil individual. Never should you attack the person you asked help from just because they did not provide you help. You are not entitled to my good side.Yet that doesn't change the fact that most of your flags are baseless and indicate no possible high risks. Asking for opposition from who can judge it without double standards unlike you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Vod on April 06, 2020, 07:20:10 AM Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place. You've never done anything to me - why would I spite you? The profiles receiving the flag are generally going to claim it's not relevant. People still deny scams proven by the blockchain. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on April 06, 2020, 07:24:28 AM 2 PMs explaining I not willing to engage in similar beheviour again and with my reasons to get stuck into it back then. And I am harrsing a person who finds fun in getting hands on others personal info, classic. Bullshit. 2 PMs whining i.e. lying how you are going to behave, which I declined after which you started attacking and harassing me. You are the very definition of a degenerate evil individual. Never should you attack the person you asked help from just because they did not provide you help. You are not entitled to my good side.Yet that doesn't change the fact that most of your flags are baseless and indicate no possible high risks. Asking for opposition from who can judge it without double standards unlike you. I asked forgiveness which you kicked on my face as I didn't wanted to curb my openions on some matters here, with threating me with posting my dox. Don't act as you don't know what you did. I can't even imagine someone as evil' as you in IRL. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Lauda on April 06, 2020, 07:27:31 AM I asked forgiveness which you kicked on my face as I didn't wanted to curb my openions on some matters here, with threating me with posting my dox. Don't act as you don't know what you did. I can't even imagine someone as evil' as you in IRL. Yes, one of the most privacy-centric users is going to post somebody's DOX. Completely legitimate logic. Read this again:Quote You are the very definition of a degenerate evil individual. Want me to write it with a permanent black marker on your forehead?Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: hacker1001101001 on April 06, 2020, 07:33:49 AM Edit : Funny how most of the people supporting it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me and due to me speaking about your double standards and abuse, not a relevant flag at first place. You've never done anything to me - why would I spite you? The profiles receiving the flag are generally going to claim it's not relevant. People still deny scams proven by the blockchain. I think Vod you should avoid supporting flags by just looking at the names involved and once check if the accused is really willing to scam someone out here. Your general statements would not seem true always. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on April 06, 2020, 08:15:48 AM Reminder:
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: peloso on April 06, 2020, 09:17:45 PM Yet that doesn't change the fact that most of your flags are baseless and indicate no possible high risks. Asking for opposition from who can judge it without double standards unlike you. she played game with trust sustem she playing game with flags now what next ::) The following statement is an unbased lie and I request more support for the flag. Funny how most of the people opposing it are primarily doing it out of spite towards me, not relevant to your flag or you. ;D most of those who support too ::) Title: Flag #1627 on #2790027 “Curiosity123” Post by: nullius on April 10, 2020, 06:20:22 PM I request support for Flag #1627 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1627) on #2790027 “Curiosity123” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2790027). Reference topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238902.0); see specifically this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238902.msg54195481#msg54195481). Thank you.
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: The Cryptovator on April 13, 2020, 07:06:11 AM Support/oppose flag type 1; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1652 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1652)
Reason; Promoting obvious ponzi scheme on the forum where trust rating isn't visible (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240005.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on April 15, 2020, 07:40:13 AM Support/oppose flag type 1 (created by Coolcryptovator): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1009
Reason: unknown and shady exchange (pretending to be Romanian, although no Romanian ever heard about it), with no phone number / address listed on its website, scammed its clients (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238319.0). Although the exchange was requested to prove its statement, no proof was brought (furthermore: no other reply from the exchange as well). DTs, feel free also to give negative feedback, if you consider this is the case here. Thank you, Coolcryptovator, for creating the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TalkStar on April 19, 2020, 06:04:23 PM Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1673 (Support/Oppose)
Please take a look on this topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5241422.0) which is already created against these guys who are running multiple projects with same plagiarized whitepaper. At their first attempt they tried to take the advantage of recent pandemic and their first project name was "Covid19coin". Now they are ready to play their scam game with another one called " Ullu" Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: scammed-by-nitro on April 20, 2020, 08:57:33 AM Hi there.
Was advised to post my flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1679 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on April 20, 2020, 09:02:34 AM Hi there. I tagged NS recently and suggested scammed-by-nitro to create this flag. It seems for newbies or less experience forum users face hard time to create a flag. I had to instruct scammed-by-nitro using several PM LOLWas advised to post my flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1679 Anyway, here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5239947.msg54253327#msg54253327) is what I said to back up my stand. I hope few DTs will look in it and will support/oppose the flag. Cheers. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Murat on April 24, 2020, 03:41:37 AM Support - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1687
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: psycodad on April 27, 2020, 09:51:44 AM I have created a flag against crex24 and would like to ask you for your support:
Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5243879 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1699 Thanks for considering. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: notblox1 on April 30, 2020, 09:21:50 PM Asking for support.
Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244733 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1767 Thanks Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: NotATether on May 12, 2020, 01:57:47 AM I ask
Flag on CDMWidewineNew (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1809) (trust feedback (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2805587)) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on May 12, 2020, 05:52:46 AM I ask Flag on CDMWidewineNew (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1809) (trust feedback (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2805587)) Correct - it only takes support from 1 DT member for the Type 1 (yellow) flag to be active. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: FatFork on May 13, 2020, 10:43:43 PM I have created a flag against aishabinteali (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1977471) and I would like your support.
Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248269.0 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1831 Thanks! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on May 16, 2020, 05:49:27 PM Need support:
Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1849) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248973.0 Reason: Loan defualted. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on May 19, 2020, 10:29:38 AM Hi, I am requesting flag support against HYIPMilker
Flag type 1, please support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1834 HYIPMilker is a ponzi scheme platform offering 30% monthly profit for a lifetime. Below is the link with topic in scam accusation board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248357.0 Since I'm here, I am also asking for flag opposition that was raised against me by finansesss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2757139). He might be an alt ( based on sent feedback ) of one other scammy member, Friend007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2766285) that i tagged and flagged for plagiarism. Flag Type 1, please oppose https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1510 Thanks! Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on May 21, 2020, 03:19:55 AM Please oppose this flag against Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1876
I had to unignore the hypertroll to read the referenced thread and it's some bullshit about Lauda changing his opinion regarding DASH... hardly a reason for a flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on May 21, 2020, 12:54:26 PM I did some self-moderated cleaning :)
See all unedited (or deleted) posts in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! (http://loyce.club/archive/topics/515/5153445.html) for a backup. Reminder: No spam Self moderated to stop spam. Don't go off-topic. Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on May 23, 2020, 03:40:36 AM Flag Support or Oppose for this case of account ownership change:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1884 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on May 23, 2020, 11:52:56 PM SoggyLettuce (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=114672) Is a serial scammer and Bitcointalk accounts seller. Newbies till continue to get scammed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247473.msg54470806#msg54470806) through his threads
The red flag one of the victims created against him still has insufficient support since it requires at least 3 DT Members to support it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1878 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on May 26, 2020, 11:59:22 PM I've added a couple of more flags to the list which can be viewed here: https://bpip.org/flaglog.aspx?accuser=Timelord2067
Some of the previous ones may have been missed in the past, perhaps if people could have a browse through and see if there's any they might want to support (or oppose, the choice after all is yours). There's 39 in all. Thanks for reading. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on May 31, 2020, 07:42:57 AM Hi, I am asking for flag support against sk hossin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2234279), bounty manager of a Arc Iris scam and behind Goldario ponzi scheme bounty as well ( hiring translators for them). He is also an alt account of previously tagged and flagged Kazi Sajib (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1146060).
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1935 More about their connection in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5239520.msg54527894#msg54527894 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on May 31, 2020, 04:27:28 PM Need support:
Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1946) Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088770.0 Reason: Loan defualted. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on June 01, 2020, 09:19:30 AM Hi, coming again to ask for flag support. This time against Bitradez (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2807543). They are trading platform ( still in development of course and having IEO at the moment) that plans, believe it or not, to send Lambos and Porches (among other gifts like iMacs and luxury watches ) as a reward to their most active users that meet certain criteria.
Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1952 More about Bitradez https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252282.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Rikafip on June 22, 2020, 07:12:27 AM Need support for 2 flags:
1st flag is against @PZMCash Bounty, alt account of already tagged and flagged PZMCash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2781011), that is used for their bounty campaign. PZMCash is a known ponzi scheme that goes on for some time Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2005 2nd flag is against @Cryptobull, OP of TCapital, MLM/ponzi scheme pretending to be TRX staking platform. They promise Rolex watches and Mercedes s500 cars to those that stake enough TRX and get enough people into this scheme. Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2054 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: 1miau on July 08, 2020, 12:46:24 AM Please support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2126
futbolcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2784969) is holding an ICO for a shitcoin called "futbolcoin", unknown team (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259606.0) and used previously fake translations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259606.msg54724697#msg54724697) on various local boards. Now, he's pretending that he doesn't collect funds (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259606.msg54751278#msg54751278) while it's clearly visible on their website that they are are collecting funds because it's an ICO. ::) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on July 09, 2020, 02:58:59 PM Please support this flag to avoid any future scams. Flag link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2128 Reference - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260941.new#new Here's the problem with your flag: you weren't actually scammed by Boombl4 (were you?). You should have opened the type 1 flag which is a yellow warning flag. The other 2 flags are for people who had an agreement with and lost money to a scammer. No doubt he is a scammer and he deserves the red flag, but you're not one of his victims (from what I can tell). You can still open a type 1 flag if you want, in which case I will gladly support it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on July 09, 2020, 04:38:01 PM edit: Sorry, I was in rush and did not read properly. You are totally right, I was not scammed. type 1 flag created - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2129 That's better. I've supported this flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: betnomi on July 10, 2020, 03:11:18 PM Hi everyone, am here to request a Flag opposition.
We believe in light of the available evidence and progress, the flag is unwarranted. Flag link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772;page=iflags Appeal thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261194.new#new Thanks for your time and consideration. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TalkStar on July 10, 2020, 03:55:46 PM Hi everyone, am here to request a Flag opposition. Your flag has already been placed to "inactive flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772;page=iflags)" section and it not showing directly on your trust page. We believe in light of the available evidence and progress, the flag is unwarranted. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261194.new#new Thanks for your time and consideration. You can add the flag link on your previous post which will help others to get on your flag page directly. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: betnomi on July 10, 2020, 04:00:47 PM Your flag has already been placed to "inactive flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772;page=iflags)" section and it not showing directly on your trust page. You can add the flag link on your previous post which will help others to get on your flag page directly. Thanks for pointing that out. Just updated the post with the flag link. Title: Compromised Account Post by: RBF on July 10, 2020, 10:25:01 PM Hi folks,
Yesterday, I've recovered the access to my account (this account). It was stolen some time ago, and after that, a lot of strange activities were performed with it. The recovery process started with an e-mail sent to recoveries...@bitcointalk.org , that asked me to sign a message related to any public address shown in my previous posts in the Forum. However, the only public address that I've found was one from the XAPO Wallet. So, the recovery team asked me some questions regarding the city in which this account was created. Also, I've shown to the recovery team that after the date that my account was stolen, I didn´t post on the Portuguese forum anymore (I'm from Brazil and 99% of my posts were there). After some confirmations, including IP check, my account was freeze and after 7 days I was able to regain access to it. I've already deleted the posts that were made during this time (I couldn´t delete some of them, but I've edited them, as you can see in my posts history). I've noted that there´s an ACTIVE FLAG linked to my account. Is it possible for you to remove or oppose it? You can check the status of my account (the recovery process) in the SECURITY LOG: https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php Link of the FLAG: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1867 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1867) Thank you for your comprehension, RBF Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SiNeReiNZzz on July 19, 2020, 02:26:11 AM Hi, guys.
I ask you to support this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2147 I hope., this way we can at least protect some people from depositing money in this casino. Thank you... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Coin_trader on July 19, 2020, 02:38:42 AM Hello fellas.
Please support this flag against Betbit Casino: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2145 The balance of the was frozen without notice and until now they don't have any update. There ANN thread seems abandoned already. It will really help if we give awareness to all possible player. Additional info: There website was down for 5 days and until now. There a lot of complaints already on there ANN thread. Check ANN thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1700628.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on July 19, 2020, 05:27:20 AM Hello fellas. I supported the flag but the link you used as reference is not the scam accusation but rather the ANN of the culprit which can be edited anytime by Betbit making it harder to follow up.Please support this flag against Betbit Casino: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2145 Next time when opening a flag, it would be good to use a link of the scam accusation or a link to the post the victim used to make a complaint. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Coin_trader on July 19, 2020, 05:34:22 AM Hello fellas. I supported the flag but the link you used as reference is not the scam accusation but rather the ANN of the culprit which can be edited anytime by Betbit making it harder to follow up.Please support this flag against Betbit Casino: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2145 Next time when opening a flag, it would be good to use a link of the scam accusation or a link to the post the victim used to make a complaint. It's already listed on my notes. This is the first time to used flag system so I have some lapses. Thank you for reminding me about it. The main reason why I used the ANN thread itself is because it was already abandoned and a lot complaints was posted there. I believe that will be sufficient as scam accusation reference. I forgot that the ANN thread can be edited anytime once the admin become online again. Rest assured all points will be considered on my next flag. But this time please excuse my foolishness. ;D Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on July 19, 2020, 11:30:24 AM Hello fellas. I supported the flag but the link you used as reference is not the scam accusation but rather the ANN of the culprit which can be edited anytime by Betbit making it harder to follow up.Please support this flag against Betbit Casino: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2145 Next time when opening a flag, it would be good to use a link of the scam accusation or a link to the post the victim used to make a complaint. It's already listed on my notes. This is the first time to used flag system so I have some lapses. Thank you for reminding me about it. The main reason why I used the ANN thread itself is because it was already abandoned and a lot complaints was posted there. I believe that will be sufficient as scam accusation reference. I forgot that the ANN thread can be edited anytime once the admin become online again. Rest assured all points will be considered on my next flag. But this time please excuse my foolishness. ;D First what you need to do, is to archive evidence. You must be sure that scammer can't delete it. After that, you can create a flag and scam accusation. IF it's not too late to archive, or you have evidence you can add your feedback to this profile with the reference link. Scam accusations must be clear and precisely showing problem. It is very hard to get a positive reputation back, even if they're false accusation. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: sheenshane on July 19, 2020, 12:31:39 PM snipped- That's right, archieve (https://archive.is/) is appropriate and good as an alternative proof if you aren't making a thread in scam accusation towards them. But I advise it is very good to create thread scam accusation for them as your reference as a valid proof. Not only for the purpose of proof, but it is also for them to appeal in the future when they will come back.Anyway, I supported the flag too. It seems they already abandoned their site and I didn't attempt it to open because I saw that it isn't a safe link. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: efialtis on July 24, 2020, 03:15:44 PM Hey,
I am asking for flag support against Sportsbet.io - didn't see this day coming but their recent actions can't be tolerated: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2160 All the info can be found in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263445.0 Quick and dirty: Player X makes relatively big deposits and can wager with no problem at all Player X wins a good amount of money Player X wants to make a withdrawal and his account is blocked Player X is supposedly abusing via multi-accounting and asked to go through KYC Player X is doing full KYC Operator states he doesn't believe Player X's story, confiscates any winnings and offers to return the deposit (for which Player X should be thankful) - all of that without providing any evidence at all Operator then staates that Player X failed KYC with no mention/evidence or anything regarding how/why he failed Player X is ready to disclose each and every personal bit of information and ready to do anything he needs for verification Operator states case is closed, no more statement It's a shame really - you can't just withhold anyone's money without providing evidence as to how the player broke ToS - you can't do that even more so when you are Sportsbet.io, probably the most trusted sportsbook in this very forum. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on July 24, 2020, 04:24:32 PM Please move the discussion about sportsbet.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=832366)'s Flag to the reference topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263445.0):
No spam Self moderated to stop spam. Don't go off-topic. Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JeromeTash on July 27, 2020, 09:24:55 PM Requesting members to support this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2166 against Bitcoin2cvvvvc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2729436)
He's asking the members in currency exchange board to use a scam exchange (usdexchanger.com) to buy BTC through it. More details; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5264453.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SiNeReiNZzz on August 03, 2020, 02:16:35 AM Hello
I'm in contact with the scammed victim (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261029.0) from Cyber.Bet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2815268). After now more than 2 weeks without any reaction to the allegation, I think it is now safe to say that this provider of gambling is not a trustworthy company! The victim is asking for help from anyone who might be able to contribute at the investigation. In which part ever, you're welcome! He also wanted me to create the flag for him. (in his name, so to speak) As you can see, he has already supported the flag himself: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2147 And hereby expressly once again, I ask everyone with a high member rank, and especially DT1 Trusted, to support this flag, please! I hope., this way we can protect some people from depositing money in this casino. Definitely as long as the allegation has not been refuted by the operator If this flag should prove to be wrong, I will of course also take care of the clarification of the flag... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Stalker22 on August 22, 2020, 07:38:27 AM Requesting a flag support and trust feedback from DT members against the tradetoken3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2824598)
Type 1 flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2231
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: The Cryptovator on August 22, 2020, 07:55:53 PM Promoting fake giveaway (instant double scheme)on the forum. He has been trying to attracts users by his false statements.
Support/Oppose flag type-1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2245 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2245) Accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5270662.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5270662.0) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: sandy-is-fine on August 24, 2020, 09:42:20 PM UK Guy has 2 pending RED scammer flags (not the yellow newbie only flag) here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=934053;page=iflags Not my flags but def need to be supported as there are multiple claims against him. Need 2 more DT's.
Here are the scam threads I can find on a quick search: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200576.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268689.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268525.msg54988150#msg54988150 Edit: Thanks. It's been done. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on September 05, 2020, 07:27:12 PM winter1001 was the bounty manager of Tweebaa, a scam project that are also proud to have a plagiarized whitepaper. Instead of admitting that the project was scam and delete the bounty thread. He instead went ahead to defend and shill (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252461.msg55086424#msg55086424) the project.
Details of the scam accusation and market manipulations - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252461.0 Type 1 Flag against winter1001 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2304 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on September 10, 2020, 10:57:04 AM Requesting flag support against bitcoinmixer.org (forum rep - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2723736)
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2723736 All the evidence is in this thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263361.0 I’ve requested that the OP creates a type 3 flag but he hasn’t done so yet. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 10, 2020, 02:26:42 PM BTCU.io falls under the same umbrella group of scam websites operated by the same bunch of criminals such as coinsbit/p2pb2b etc. Please check this out and support the flag:
Scam Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5255830.0 BTCU_ULTIMATE - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2824182 Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2313 Thank you Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on September 20, 2020, 10:10:24 AM DT members, please support Type 1 Flag #2342 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2342) (scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277059.0)) against a probable fake newbie account that was created in 2017, suddenly woke up with a password change, made a false scam accusation against Prime Dice (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274951.0), and then turned around and promised to advertise a “no risky” dice profit strategy (ironically with statement of using “alotof alts accounts on primedice”).
Thank you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on September 20, 2020, 10:47:53 AM Flag supported.
No matter how small or trivial a scam might seem but a scam is a scam at the end of the day. DT members, please support Type 1 Flag #2342 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2342) (scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277059.0)) against a probable fake newbie account that was created in 2017, suddenly woke up with a password change, made a false scam accusation against Prime Dice (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274951.0), and then turned around and promised to advertise a “no risky” dice profit strategy (ironically with statement of using “alotof alts accounts on primedice”). Thank you. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SiNeReiNZzz on September 22, 2020, 08:13:59 AM DT members, please support Type 1 Flag #2342 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2342) (scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277059.0)) against a probable fake newbie account that was created in 2017, suddenly woke up with a password change, made a false scam accusation against Prime Dice (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274951.0), and then turned around and promised to advertise a “no risky” dice profit strategy (ironically with statement of using “alotof alts accounts on primedice”). Thank you. I have also supported the flag! Additionally I have left negative feedback in his profile. It is really starting to annoy... Best Regards Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SamuelJobs on September 23, 2020, 06:04:19 PM Requesting support for this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2695959
Story: Contacted this guy about his self-moderated and locked topic about selling XRP here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277725.0 I send him this private message: https://prnt.sc/umm6bb After few minutes he contacted me thru telegram: https://prnt.sc/umm6mh https://prnt.sc/umm6ta https://prnt.sc/umm79v https://prnt.sc/umm7je https://prnt.sc/umm7sp https://prnt.sc/umm83w https://prnt.sc/umm8dx After that i received negative feedback from this 3rd world failed scammer :D I hope he will be tagged and also flag supported. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SiNeReiNZzz on September 24, 2020, 12:09:26 PM Requesting support for this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2695959 Story: Contacted this guy about his self-moderated and locked topic about selling XRP here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277725.0 I send him this private message: https://prnt.sc/umm6bb After few minutes he contacted me thru telegram: https://prnt.sc/umm6mh https://prnt.sc/umm6ta https://prnt.sc/umm79v https://prnt.sc/umm7je https://prnt.sc/umm7sp https://prnt.sc/umm83w https://prnt.sc/umm8dx After that i received negative feedback from this 3rd world failed scammer :D I hope he will be tagged and also flag supported. Flag not supported! I think you have to look at yourself... For the future it would be good to add a direct link to the flag, to make it easier for us... Best Regards SiNeReiNZzz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251328) Title: Re: New Coinsbit sock puppet Post by: JollyGood on October 16, 2020, 07:08:39 AM I have supported the flag because the same scammers are now using a self-moderated thread to try to steal from people and forum members need to be aware of it.
Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2865721), which started a self moderated thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282230) today! Thx! Title: Re: New Coinsbit sock puppet Post by: examplens on October 16, 2020, 10:22:40 AM Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2865721), which started a self moderated thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282230) today! Thx! When I see a topic like on the flag, I lost the will to read it all. There the damn book writer and posted all conversations. Tons of screenshots with "hi" messages on Telegram, etc... Need to spend too much time for one sock puppet account. You should be a little more concise in exposition. I am supported flag against user BTCU_ULTIMATE, whether they are the same accounts or it connects them in the same scam? Title: Re: New Coinsbit sock puppet Post by: LoyceV on October 16, 2020, 05:02:00 PM Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2865721) As I wrote on your feedback: you're a Trust abuser. I'll let you have this post in my thread though, but I don't want to read your very long topic. Examplens is right (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.msg55390559#msg55390559): BTCU_official is only mentioned after hitting PageDown 60 times.I've done some self-moderating on this subject, see https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5153445.html if you really want to read it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Steamtyme on October 19, 2020, 07:00:00 AM In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282911.0 Edit: My response to Nullius in the other thread, only updating as it seems relevant to the post below. I will not be discussing this flag further in this thread. That's fine and you are free to do so. The flag criteria is easily met for me moving forward from this day. Dealing with the account is a risk. reading what the account wrote is not. My own neutral feedback also states the value of some of their previous posts. i am not in anyway discussing the individual behind the Lauda account only the account itself. Quote This account has been abandoned. Do not deal with this account under any circumstances as it will not be the original owner. Beyond that please still learn from the informative posts they created here on the forum. Edit: Forum admins have taken steps to lock the account permanently, in the same manner as the Satoshi account. I no longer see a warning flag as necessary with the Lauda account. I have removed my support for the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on October 19, 2020, 07:20:45 AM I request that DT oppose this flag. Thanks. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398
I request support for this Flag on the Lauda account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398 In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282911.0 As I stated in the relevant topic, to which further discussion should be directed: I don’t think that it is right, productive, or at all appropriate to place a big warning banner on all of Lauda’s old threads, such as the famous wallet thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1631151.0) and stickied rules threads (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1689727.0) (!). Whoever was behind the Lauda account was and is trustworthy—only, no longer connected to the account, as of today. That is why I red-tagged the account with negative feedback, and a statement explicitly beginning, “Starting with the date of this feedback...” (And I was the first to tag the account.) I considered raising a flag myself, then rejected the idea; and I have opposed your flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on October 19, 2020, 01:12:48 PM I request support for this Flag on the Lauda account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398 In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams. The reasoning is sound and works for me. Not every account should have a warning attached, but the author them-self suggested hacking or impersonation might occur. SUPPORTED. Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 19, 2020, 03:12:47 PM Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago... See:I will request that theymos ban the "Lauda" account (u=101872) Done. Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Steamtyme on October 19, 2020, 06:58:36 PM Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago... See:I will request that theymos ban the "Lauda" account (u=101872) Done. Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore.I have removed my support of the flag, and updated my post in this topic stating as much. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on October 20, 2020, 12:17:02 AM I have removed my support of the flag, and updated my post in this topic stating as much. As I said in the other thread, support has now been withdrawn. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: notblox1 on October 22, 2020, 02:58:24 PM Someone please support or oppose a Flag for member casino_sa_toshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868044) and give him negative feedback.
He is most likely same scammer bittrafficme (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2706235) or better know as serial casino scammer. Using exact same website and software. More information: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283572.msg55430674#msg55430674 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283572.msg55430924#msg55430924 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2405 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: BettingSolutions on November 11, 2020, 02:02:15 AM Requesting support for red flag on user "corlies" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2827158
All proofs and statements are in the report against him https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5288324 User was aditing contacting us for fake sale, after being caught and ignoring the request of escrow, he start to attack us with false non-proof based arguments, trying to cover his failed scam attempt by trying to connect us with people with past shady activity. His ignorance, arrogance and aggressive attitude after escrow request is more than a red flag there is something shady with this member Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2459 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on November 15, 2020, 07:45:01 PM DTs, please support:
Flag #2465 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2465) on #2880133 “Slbtc” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2880133) (trust page (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2880133)) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on November 25, 2020, 06:13:29 PM Hello. Please don't break bumping rules (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0) in my topic.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on November 29, 2020, 05:42:37 PM Requesting support for a flag against user asu:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5294730.msg55712657#msg55712657 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2497 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TalkStar on January 03, 2021, 09:27:23 PM I am requesting support for this flag. Please take a look here,
Flag Type 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2566 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: decodx on January 03, 2021, 10:17:41 PM I am requesting support for this flag. Please take a look here, Flag Type 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2566 Flaf supported. Obviously, this is a scammer looking for new naive victims. Stay safe. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Coin-1 on January 11, 2021, 11:10:42 PM I am requesting support for this "Type 2" flag:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2567 As far as I understand, due to the described incident, many honest traders lost their cryptocurrency worth over $58000 at the current price. I personally suffered a financial damage of about $1700. I consider that the project team scammed me. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: actmyname on January 16, 2021, 10:27:27 PM Vareole is a scammer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2587) - 1 DT member from activity.
Original Thread. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309440.0) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Csmiami on February 24, 2021, 06:22:54 PM I'm requesting support for my flag against a casino here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2646
In depth information is presented on the thread, but I'll however make a short explanation here too: I participated in some free prediction game, being the prize of it some freebets to be spent on the casino with some requirements. I managed to end in a winning position, but never received a notification of the bet being credited. Later, I was made aware elsewhere that the bets had been paid, so I contacted the casino owner over PM in telegram. I was told that the bet had been credited but expired when it was accepted and that it'd be looked into. 18 days have passed ever since, and the version has changed to "you were credited and it expired because it wasn't used" here on the forum; I'm still missing the bet, and the operator has tried to publicky "shame" (?) me for never having deposited in the platform; as if that was reason enough to not credited me my winnings Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: SiNeReiNZzz on February 26, 2021, 09:54:24 PM I'm requesting support for my flag against a casino here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2646 In depth information is presented on the thread, but I'll however make a short explanation here too: I participated in some free prediction game, being the prize of it some freebets to be spent on the casino with some requirements. I managed to end in a winning position, but never received a notification of the bet being credited. Later, I was made aware elsewhere that the bets had been paid, so I contacted the casino owner over PM in telegram. I was told that the bet had been credited but expired when it was accepted and that it'd be looked into. 18 days have passed ever since, and the version has changed to "you were credited and it expired because it wasn't used" here on the forum; I'm still missing the bet, and the operator has tried to publicky "shame" (?) me for never having deposited in the platform; as if that was reason enough to not credited me my winnings Okay I will first read up on the subject and then I will certainly support your flag. If no agreement can be found with this casino... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on March 02, 2021, 08:45:03 AM Please support a Type 3 flag against a long-time scammer under a new alt account:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2648 Somewhat amazingly, there's been a fair number of newbs complaining about getting scammed by accounts that have negative trust and flags. There's seemingly no way to prevent these people from getting scammed. Maybe there's been an uptick in people looking for deals too good to be true. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: icopress on March 04, 2021, 10:12:35 PM Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.0) but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity.
https://i.imgur.com/5InTKvy.png Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on March 13, 2021, 06:44:24 PM Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.0) but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity. Oh well, this happenes because Timelord is a very ill person and he can not judge properly anymore. Once I thought he is the village idiot, but I was wrong. Somehow, even c******unter observed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185736.msg56339536#msg56339536) (in one of his few good observations), that Timelord is a mentally disturbed person, which needs to be institutionalized for receiving proper medical attention. As you can see in the pointed link, his mental condition is not very stable, as he also started to accuse theymos for various things. He also accused me of FUD (lol?!) and many others for various imbecile suppositions. The same is true in your inquiry. The man is mentally challenged and I advise you to ignore him. A Romanian proverb says to not mess with crazies, as their brains are well rested :) You decide what to understand from here. Do you really want to challenge a guy which accuses theymos and protects game-protect...? I doubt that lol. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: suchmoon on March 14, 2021, 12:33:54 AM Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.0) but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity. He stated the reason quite clearly on page 1: According to your second link there is already a flag that has been created for this issue: [...] My understanding is that @theymos stated two flags cannot be created for the same issue. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: savetheFORUM on March 17, 2021, 03:09:22 AM Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.0) but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity. Oh well, this happenes because Timelord is a very ill person and he can not judge properly anymore. Once I thought he is the village idiot, but I was wrong. Somehow, even c******unter observed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185736.msg56339536#msg56339536) (in one of his few good observations), that Timelord is a mentally disturbed person, which needs to be institutionalized for receiving proper medical attention. As you can see in the pointed link, his mental condition is not very stable, as he also started to accuse theymos for various things. He also accused me of FUD (lol?!) and many others for various imbecile suppositions. The same is true in your inquiry. The man is mentally challenged and I advise you to ignore him. A Romanian proverb says to not mess with crazies, as their brains are well rested :) You decide what to understand from here. Do you really want to challenge a guy which accuses theymos and protects game-protect...? I doubt that lol. I am sorry to say but you should watch your language. This is the reason why maybe BTC whitepaper was not given to you for translation because you add a bit too many feelings from your own side. A simple reason was given by suchmoon because TimeLord didn't want to support the second flag for the same issue, you said so much without actually knowing the reality. "My understanding is that @theymos stated two flags cannot be created for the same issue." by Timelord2067 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163510.msg51774937#msg51774937) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on March 31, 2021, 02:50:33 PM I am sorry to say but you should watch your language. This is the reason why maybe BTC whitepaper was not given to you for translation because you add a bit too many feelings from your own side. Apologies for the late reply. I kept wanted to reply for also forgot. So... I think you are a bit confused here, about the procedure of submitting a change for bitcoin.org, including about translations. They are not given to someone per se. You have to submit a pull request, if you want to submit a change. Your change is then analyzed by the site's maintainers and, if your proposal is good, it will be accepted. So it seems you don't know what you are talking about in this case. There was not even a discussion about the translation not being given to me lol. I just observed the existing translation is a mess and I started working on a completely new one. Which I finalized, and the pull request was made (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5285986.msg56670047#msg56670047) already, for having it submitted and checked by bitcoin.org's maintainers. Coming back to Timelord, it is obvious that the poor man is mentally challenged. You can see that in >90% of his posts. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on April 14, 2021, 12:44:52 AM Need support:
User: Continuous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=951567) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2701 Referenced: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5330427.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on April 17, 2021, 10:23:03 PM Our friend here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5330951.0) opened a type 2 flag and needs a couple of DT members to support it so that it becomes active;
Accusation/Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5330951.0 Type 2 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2707 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: rajatabbey1234 on April 20, 2021, 11:04:33 AM Support will be highly appreciated. Your support may be able to save me from the disaster. Thanks Everyone and Anyone.
Accusation/Reference : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5327634.msg56686275#msg56686275 Type 3 Flag : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154563;page=iflags Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on April 20, 2021, 09:27:04 PM Support will be highly appreciated. Your support may be able to save me from the disaster. Thanks Everyone and Anyone. Accusation/Reference : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5327634.msg56686275#msg56686275 Type 3 Flag : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154563;page=iflags This case needs more attention. Cloudbet holds 25000 USDT user funds for more than 40 days without any explanation. they were already accused and only after the pressure here and open scam accusation, they refunded money to the player. everything indicates that they are making the same mistake again Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on April 25, 2021, 03:27:13 AM #2693768 “UpAgain” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2693768) is creating a spate of ridiculous threads and soliciting money in various ways. I created Flag #2737 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2737) with the requisite scam accusations thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333056.0) to gather the evidence in one place, and get a warning banner on his threads before some newbie gets suckered into sending him money somehow. Please support.
(In my personal opinion, this user does not deserve his own thread; but that’s how the flag system works, so—I waste my time with flag bureaucracy.) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2021, 03:19:18 PM An old scammer created a new account, please support this new type 3 Flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2810
Accounts involved This scammer created another account, hoping to get rid of his negative feedback and Flag. I can't let that happen, his Flags don't expire before March 2029.BetKing.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=565024) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=565024) !!!: +2 / =2 / -8) (10 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/565024.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-13_Sat_08.22h/565024.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BetKing.io)) BetKing Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1055046) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1055046) !!!: +0 / =0 / -7) (1 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1055046.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-13_Sat_08.22h/1055046.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BetKing Support)) PocketRocketsCasino (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=97219) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=97219) !!!: +2 / =1 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-13_Sat_08.22h/97219.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=PocketRocketsCasino)) dean nolan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=941114) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=941114) !!!: +0 / =0 / -6) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-13_Sat_08.22h/941114.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dean nolan)) Update: Betking Manager (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3364966) As a victim of this scammer, the Flag system allows me to create a Flag for all his accounts: Can I also create a scammer flag for alt-accounts of the contract violator? Example: BetKing.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=565024) violated a contract, but BetKing Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1055046), dean nolan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=941114) and PocketRocketsCasino (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=97219) are his alt-accounts. Yes, one of the victims can.I created a new type 3 Flag, please support it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2810 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on August 09, 2021, 09:54:41 AM Please support my flag on aTriz:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2812 He is still working hard at cheating bounties with his alt accounts, one of which is jamalaezaz. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335270.msg57652170#msg57652170 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on August 12, 2021, 12:51:16 PM I supported the flag. Please be aware that aTriz may not, in fact, be the original aTriz. I have my reasons to believe that the account changed hands in time.
aTriz returned to the forum in October last year, having a very suspicious behavior. For those not aware, this is what happened: aTriz just made his first posts after 10 months. Four of them were applications in various signature campaigns ([1] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197049.msg55427728#msg55427728), [2] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283032.msg55427761#msg55427761), [3] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217201.msg55427809#msg55427809), [4] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283705.msg55432328#msg55432328)). Like any manager would select him after a pause of 10 months lol. His 5th and 6th posts were other posts where he is looking for a job ([5] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283685.msg55432383#msg55432383), [6] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2232934.msg55432390#msg55432390)). Actually, the 6th post is a bump of his topic where he announces that he is looking for a job as campaign manager. Like anyone would hire him as a manager after what he did with Gunbot campaign (https://web.archive.org/web/20190903114953/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2482937.460). Anyway, excepting the ridiculous posts, the main problem is that the account can be owned by someone else. Be careful when dealing with this account. Now seeing this flag does not surprise me at all, as I was almost sure that aTriz was walking on a very thin ice since returning here. Excepting the "Alia incident" (which I will not reiterate again), his behavior was sort of weird back then as well, but now "weird" is not the adequate term anymore, as he went on the Dark Side. Thanks nutildah for bringing this up. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 23, 2021, 04:12:29 PM I'm in doubt: A casino closed a user's account, and took 399 mBTC without valid reason. The casino's main ANN-thread was created by user eGoldgg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1208890), who last posted 3 years ago. The thread is "maintained" by user Buff88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2027468).
I'd like to show a scam warning above the topic, which means user eGoldgg should have a Flag. I'm in doubt if this fits the Flag-rules, but if it doesn't fit the rules, it means there's a loophole to avoid a warning on a thread. The scammed user created 2 Flags, both type 2: Quote 2816 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2816) (Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2816;support) | Oppose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2816;oppose)) GekkeBelg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2710088.html) flagged eGoldgg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1208890.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356139.0)). Supported by GekkeBelg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2710088.html). Opposed by nobody. 2815 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2815) (Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2815;support) | Oppose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2815;oppose)) GekkeBelg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2710088.html) flagged Buff88 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2027468.html) (type 2, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356139.0)). Supported by LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), GekkeBelg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2710088.html). Opposed by nobody. (source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/429.html)) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on August 23, 2021, 07:09:39 PM The casino's main ANN-thread was created by user eGoldgg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1208890), who last posted 3 years ago. The thread is "maintained" by user Buff88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2027468). I'd like to show a scam warning above the topic, which means user eGoldgg should have a Flag. I'm in doubt if this fits the Flag-rules, but if it doesn't fit the rules, it means there's a loophole to avoid a warning on a thread. I'm in doubt as well, as I never faced this situation before. At first glance, I supported the second flag, the one against Buff88, since he is maintaining the thread. However, I am not so sure if eGoldgg is out of any suspicion. He last posted 3 years ago indeed, but he is still active in the forum (he was active even today). However, it seems to be a loophole indeed. Is there any way to obtain such a warning for the said thread by requesting it to mods or global mods? Users should be warned somehow. I mean to have that warning posted even though the first flag, the one against eGoldgg would not find support. Alternatively, maybe mods can make Buff88 as new OP of the thread (it would not be the first time this happened) and having a flag against him would make the warning to be displayed... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 23, 2021, 07:39:14 PM I am not so sure if eGoldgg is out of any suspicion. He last posted 3 years ago indeed, but he is still active in the forum (he was active even today). 2 days ago, he hadn't been online for almost 2 years:@eGoldgg: you haven't been online in almost 2 years. As the creator of this topic, you may want to respond to GekkeBelg's post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3309139.msg57724756#msg57724756). So I don't think it's a coincidence he showed up now.However, it seems to be a loophole indeed. Is there any way to obtain such a warning for the said thread by requesting it to mods or global mods? Users should be warned somehow. I mean to have that warning posted even though the first flag, the one against eGoldgg would not find support. If this really is a loophole, the only alternative I can think of is creating a type 1 Flag to get some warning on the topic.Maybe I should take this question to theymos' Flag thread. Done: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.msg57768439#msg57768439 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Denpatrick71 on September 09, 2021, 06:01:21 PM Please support my flag here:
Type 3 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2830 User: Stunna Scam Accusations thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5358162 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on September 12, 2021, 03:31:03 PM Please support my flag here: I have engaged ob the topic you have mentioned but it is a matter of sorrow that I could not agree your point and I have not got any point to support your flag hence I think we should oppose your flag. I am following the case how it goes!Type 3 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2830 User: Stunna Scam Accusations thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5358162 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on September 19, 2021, 08:43:36 AM I'm asking attention for this type 3 Flag:
Quote 2021-09-19 Sun 10.09h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/430.html) 2835 Insufficient support. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2835) (Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2835;support) | Oppose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2835;oppose)) oz.kashi (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2843705.html) flagged btc365partners (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/3369866.html) (type 3, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359552.0)). Supported by LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), Jawhead999 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2578892.html), Maasdamer (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2865219.html), Blossom15 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/1244973.html), LEVSKI7 (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2689577.html), oz.kashi (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2843705.html), kontrakwel (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/3373514.html), rokuen (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2795942.html). Opposed by btc365partners (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/3369866.html). Scam accusation thread: BTC365.com SCAM me 20Mbtc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359552.0) Accused user: btc365partners (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3369866) My very short summary of what made me decide to Support this Flag: here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359552.msg57970804#msg57970804). Update: Case resolved (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359552.msg58028545#msg58028545). I have withdrawn my Support for this Flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JeromeTash on September 19, 2021, 09:59:34 PM Accusation: User @Pbacala scammer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5360758)
In short, the victim paid money to the accused, who has refused to respond after receiving the Bitcoin payment Please support/oppose type 3 flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2840 At least support of 1 DT member is required so that the flag becomes active Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nutildah on September 29, 2021, 06:10:38 AM Please support this Type II flag on colires (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2827158), a confirmed Currency Exchange and Accounts scammer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2841 The number of similarities (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361016.msg57997094#msg57997094) between him and other suspected/known scammers is too great to ignore, as is the evidence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361016.0)supporting the flag against him. Please vote Yes on Flag 2841 and help keep scammers out of our forum, thanks for your support. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on October 23, 2021, 04:39:14 PM Please DT memebers Support my flage A Casino turned on theire TOS and took my 1.3 bitcoins I think you should post the link of the profile and at least you should post the link of the flag. You flag is available on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=917361;page=iflags Casino Duckdice.io Support for post bellow https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5364266.0 I have seen there are several more flags available on the same user. Also, I think you should unlock the thread so that they can reply if they want on your topic. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on October 23, 2021, 05:19:06 PM Please DT memebers Support my flage A Casino turned on theire TOS and took my 1.3 bitcoins I think you should post the link of the profile and at least you should post the link of the flag. You flag is available on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=917361;page=iflags Casino Duckdice.io Support for post bellow https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5364266.0 I have seen there are several more flags available on the same user. Also, I think you should unlock the thread so that they can reply if they want on your topic. I don't think there is a need to reopen that thread. several DT members participated in that discussion and it was found that there were no conditions for the flag. yes, a few open/available flags are on the user Duckdice.io, but none of them has enough support, so they are all inactive Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on November 08, 2021, 08:29:39 AM Please support this flag for member KanoKano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3403196), imposter who claims he created Bitcoin7 exchange but don't want to prove it, and he also asks members to sign up for hi spam emails like it's explained in THIS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369465.msg58373497#msg58373497) post asking money from people.
He continues to ignore any warnings and questions I asked and continues to write some nonsense. Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money, so I created a flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2862 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on November 21, 2021, 05:29:02 PM Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3101812 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2868 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5372449 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: NotATether on November 25, 2021, 04:54:01 PM Please support my flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2875) on marios22558 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=824651) (trust feedback (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=824651) reference topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373152.0))
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Juwel on November 26, 2021, 03:12:31 PM BC.game has locked my account with 115+ referrals. I have created a scam accusation against BC game and also created a flag against bc game. Please check the reference link and support the flag if you think I am right.
Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2503677 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2870 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369644.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 09, 2022, 09:51:14 AM I knew there was a thread like this.
Yesterday I created a Flag type 1 against CatenaX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3389405), please support. I just created a flag, please support it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2907 Warned both CMC and CG and soon CEX will be delisted/tagged. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: JollyGood on February 09, 2022, 10:15:48 AM Tagged.
This was an excellent informative post, thank you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379400.msg59179587#msg59179587 I knew there was a thread like this. Yesterday I created a Flag type 1 against CatenaX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3389405), please support. I just created a flag, please support it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2907 Warned both CMC and CG and soon CEX will be delisted/tagged. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Baskin198 on February 20, 2022, 08:53:53 PM FLAG: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2912
It has been over 1 month now and stake is playing games with me. I have created a thread with all the details - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383835.0 Long story short Stake has frozen $80k ($70k originally but due to price rise is now $80k) and it has been a month and more now. They said the odds provider is doing some investigation but failed to provide any update at all neither able to provide any progress report on what they are doing and how long they will take. The stake integrity team (which I was asked to contact) has not replied to my emails for more than 20 days and have even stopped replying to my host when she (Djiana) asks them for an update. I am left with no option but to raise a flag against them at this stage. Please support/oppose the flag based on facts and not their prior reputation and/or your experience because even I have immense respect for stake but what they are doing now is beyond acceptable. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: FatFork on April 06, 2022, 01:55:54 PM I created a Flag type 1 against MrCrank, please support.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2939 A so-called bounty manager promotes a fraudulent project (with plagiarized whitepaper) that takes advantage of the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. Reference: [WARNING] UKAN Plagiarized Whitepaper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391087.0) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on April 08, 2022, 04:58:32 AM AccountsLegend (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2595948) is a serial account seller who can not be trusted and is still active making new posts and seeking account related services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5393577.0)
A flag was opened against user by 2double0, but for some reason DiamondCardz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=55122) who is now inactive opposed it ::) Requesting for more support such that the type 1 flag becomes active https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=627 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on April 08, 2022, 06:06:46 AM AccountsLegend (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2595948) is a serial account seller who can not be trusted and is still active making new posts and seeking account related services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5393577.0) I have supported the flag and I am surprised to see that DiamondCardz has opposed the flag who is in default trusted list. It may happen by mistake, have you contacted with DiamondCardz about this fact. I have not found any reason behind opposition of the flag.A flag was opened against user by 2double0, but for some reason DiamondCardz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=55122) who is now inactive opposed it ::) Requesting for more support such that the type 1 flag becomes active https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=627 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: NeuroticFish on April 08, 2022, 06:39:22 AM I am surprised to see that DiamondCardz has opposed the flag who is in default trusted list. It may happen by mistake, have you contacted with DiamondCardz about this fact. I have not found any reason behind opposition of the flag. 1. DiamondCardz is inactive for almost a year. 2. From what I see, he's trusted by 3 active accounts and 21 inactives. Maybe, just maybe (food for thought), inactives' vote should not matter in DT elections. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Solosanz on June 16, 2022, 10:49:57 AM This was started because of many withdrawal problem comes up on Bitlucy thread and there's still on going victim who didn't get his funds back.
Request for support to warn everyone who visit their ANN to know this problem. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2984 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: nullius on July 05, 2022, 02:49:46 PM I ask that at least 3 DT members support this flag (direct discussion to the relevant Scam Accusations topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405127.0)):
Flag 2998 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2998) created. Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405127.0), I believe that anyone dealing with Dabs is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user’s opinions. A non-exclusive summary of some facts in evidence which, when taken together, constitute concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with:
The foregoing list of concrete red flags could already be continued. It will thus conclude for now, to avoid excessively repetitive redundancy and waste of time. Negative trust feedback will be issued on the same basis. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: jamyr on July 07, 2022, 10:43:50 AM Request for Opposition or Support,
i prefer you support but feel free to oppose and/or give your opinion as to why you oppose or support the flag. Flag for Bitsler (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3002) Thank you folks. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Jawhead999 on July 16, 2022, 12:00:54 PM Request for support my flag against this newbie promoting ponzi scheme.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3006 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on July 16, 2022, 01:05:24 PM Request a support for ponzi scheme site You may want to rephrase that ;)Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: AB de Royse777 on October 29, 2022, 11:28:38 AM Requesting to support the flag against EdenHazard.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3041 The account has changed hand and the original owner never paid me 0.3 btc that he took as loan from me. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Eternad on December 01, 2022, 01:46:01 PM Requesting to support my flag against scammer that still actively selling on the marketplace section of the forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3061
Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on December 16, 2022, 09:35:19 AM Please support or oppose the flag.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3065 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5429186.0 User: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016829 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Coinbox1 on December 20, 2022, 09:49:15 AM There are 2 active flags for 1 already-solved case. The 2 flags are for the same case, and the case itself has been resolved, confirmed by the OP and labeled on the subject line already.
Please help to oppose the flags because a valid flag should only be "a set of pretty clear fact-statements" according to theymos. Since the case itself is resolved, the flag is no longer a "a set of pretty clear fact-statements". Flag 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3066 Flag 2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3062 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5425888.0 Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2569866 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on January 13, 2023, 07:58:23 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=140827#newfeedback (scroll to top of page to see flag)
yogg, degenerate gambler who stole funds. (Proof) - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434506.msg61586158#msg61586158 Please support the flag. Unfortunately it’s only a type 1 flag. We need somebody who was scammed to do a red, type 3 flag. This will have to do for now though. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on January 13, 2023, 08:10:52 AM (scroll to top of page to see flag) Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3083Quote 2023-01-13 Fri 09.11h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/443.html) 3083 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3083) (Support (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3083;support) | Oppose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3083;oppose)) LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html) flagged yogg (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/140827.html) (type 1, see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434506.0)). Supported by LFC_Bitcoin (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/379487.html), LoyceV (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/459836.html), bullrun2020bro (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/personal/2744352.html). Opposed by nobody. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: fillippone on January 14, 2023, 10:26:03 AM Trust list updated, flag supported.
Incredible to see the price for which a person is keen on betraying another’s trust. Apparently, yogg's price was 50K. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: decodx on January 14, 2023, 01:45:40 PM yogg, degenerate gambler who stole funds. <...> Flag supported. As I am not active on the Collectibles board, this is my first time reading about this. It would be helpful for someone to provide a brief summary or TLDR; on the Reputation board. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GazetaBitcoin on January 14, 2023, 04:30:06 PM I also supported the flag.
Flag supported. As I am not active on the Collectibles board, this is my first time reading about this. It would be helpful for someone to provide a brief summary or TLDR; on the Reputation board. Long story short: - yogg is the manager of Cold Key cards project - after a period of depression, when he did not have motivation anymore to continue the project and stalled customers' (already paid) orders he decides to resume his work though - at some point he realizes that he kept a back-up of private keys for an entire series of cards - for unknown reasons (some saying he is addicted to gambling) he decides to cash-out all the BTC stored on those cards (the cards were in the possession of their owners) - someone realizes that his card was emptied and runs a topic in Reputation board: My Cold Keys Just Got Swiped! All Halving Sets!! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434506.0) - yogg admits his unthinkable gesture (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434506.msg61587321#msg61587321) - according to krogoth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434597.0), yogg stole 0.00625 BTC from each card, total prejudice being around 50.000$ - end of story. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Helena Yu on January 16, 2023, 05:07:12 AM Request support this flag on yogg's alt account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3084 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Kirito89 on January 17, 2023, 07:08:46 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3085
Requesting support for this flag. We have been dealing with a person blackmail-ing us where he claimed he will take our trustpilot reputation down ( he succeded, but trustpilot removed the fake reviews after a while), aswell as bitcointalk and other online medias. Currently he's created another thread on bitcointalk where he claims we banned his account with a 1036 USDT deposit on his balance, deposit doesn't exist , but we've asked him to post the deposit transaction hash on his thread numerous times to validate his claims ( he can't as it doesn't exist, but since he made a public accusation it should be treated as a regular case where a user might have an issue). While he will abbandon the account and continue with a fresh one and a whole new story, would really appreciate the support on the flag if you deem it appropiate as some bitcointalk members will simply overlook the the context of the thread and simply base their replies/oppinions on the thread title and opening post. Kirito89, Duckdice Support. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on January 17, 2023, 07:28:54 AM Request support this flag on yogg's alt account. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3084 Why not on Coldkey u=2614643 as well? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on January 27, 2023, 01:52:59 AM Request support this flag on yogg's alt account. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3084 Why not on Coldkey u=2614643 as well? SiNeReiNZzz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251328) - Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3092) Defaulted in a loan facilitated by shasan on 2021-11-11 and has been offline since 2022-03-05 Coldkey (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2614643) - Flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3093) Alt of yogg Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on January 27, 2023, 05:09:51 AM Though Timelord2067 created a flag against SiNeReiNZzz that is not a violation of written contact with him. So, I have created a flag that will be shown as trade with extreme caution if enough support by DT.
Username: SiNeReiNZzz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251328) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3094 Reason: Loan default. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on January 27, 2023, 04:52:21 PM I created a flag against member saxydev who violated a written deal made with me, and I was not paid 0.1 Bitcoin like it was agreed.
This member can't be trusted about anything and he was already accused by other members for his suspicious behavior and services. I am asking from others to support or oppose flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3086 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on January 29, 2023, 03:49:38 AM I have created a flag to a user who had defaulted 0.015 Bitcoin loan. I noticed I had not to created a flag eitherr flag system started after the default or I was not aware about the flag system.
User: Apriand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669062) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3097 Please support/oppose the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on January 29, 2023, 11:44:39 AM I believe the original Flag against jamalaezaz has issues (and is now three years old now), so I have created a new Flag against jamalaezaz.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3096 Please support it. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on February 03, 2023, 03:05:13 PM have created a flag for a user who had defaulted 0.4 ETH loan. I noticed my flag has expired for the time being passed. So, I created the flag again to show "trade with extreme caution".
User: cleygaux (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=902035) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3101 Please support/oppose the flag. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on February 04, 2023, 01:04:58 AM I have created a flag to a user who had defaulted 0.015 Bitcoin loan. I noticed I had not to created a flag eitherr flag system started after the default or I was not aware about the flag system. User: Apriand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669062) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3097 Please support/oppose the flag. They have an alt account apriandalt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1905884) that does not have any Flags on it. There is a second alt Budhenk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=559793) which they claim was hacked (but likewise has no Flag). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on February 04, 2023, 12:33:52 PM I noticed my flag has expired for the time being passed. By now 100 Flags have expired (https://loyce.club/trust/flags/444.html). They're mostly Type 2 Flags.Summary: Type 1 (the "mildest" Newbie Flag): doesn't expire. Type 2 ("violated casual agreement"): expires 3 years after the event. Type 3 ("violated written agreement"): expires 10 years after the event. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on February 04, 2023, 09:11:53 PM I noticed my flag has expired for the time being passed. By now 100 Flags have expired (https://loyce.club/trust/flags/444.html). They're mostly Type 2 Flags.Summary: Type 1 (the "mildest" Newbie Flag): doesn't expire. Type 2 ("violated casual agreement"): expires 3 years after the event. Type 3 ("violated written agreement"): expires 10 years after the event. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: spyrosc200 on February 11, 2023, 08:30:58 PM Please support my flag on OLE777Official:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3518507 Long story short: -When i requested a withdrawal of 0.25btc, Ole7.io casino closed my account and confiscated whole balance of 0.50BTC (around 11700 USD at that time) -When i asked about the reason for their acts, they responded generically about arbitrage/syndicate bets which is nonsense. - I challenged them to provide proofs for their actions, i allowed them to post my complete betting history and i even propose them to use a 3rd party mediator to solve the case. No response from their side. - Even though their representative is aware about my scam accusation topic, he haven't provide any proofs for their actions for many days and his only response is that he can't provide more info blah blah blah. Full details on my scam accusation topic below: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5438203.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on February 12, 2023, 01:54:31 AM 3 flags have expired as I created those type 2 flags, and already 3 years have passed. So I have made those flags again with type 3.
User: Maxwell20 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1998790) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3109 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan defaulted User: Razerglass (http://Razerglass) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3110 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan defaulted User: SportbetMaster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=905414) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3111 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan defaulted Please support or oppose these flags. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Timelord2067 on February 14, 2023, 10:25:26 AM 3 flags have expired as I created those type 2 flags, and already 3 years have passed. So I have made those flags again with type 3. Supported. May I suggest you also update the first post in those threads with the updated Flag numbers? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: c0ldbrewz on February 14, 2023, 01:49:06 PM Requesting support/oppose flag on saxydev
I just created flag against saxydev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410716) Reason for the flag can be read in this thread Doing some work for Saxydev, Earned $90 but Never received the Payment. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5439659.0) Flag : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3112 Thanks :) Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on February 16, 2023, 12:31:14 PM User: BROOP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3535361)
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3113 Flag Type: 1 Reason: Selling Account Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: lesliegray on March 01, 2023, 07:35:52 AM Requesting support for this flag against Betnomi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3120
Scam accusation link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440776.0 Betnomi is a casino/sportsbook and they took 3600$ from me after I completed KYC and have been ignoring me for over a month afterwards. They've even ignored a solid ADR called The Pogg where Betnomi is listed and they don't even bother responding to the accusation either. This is their reason for suspending my account: ”The user is manipulating the pricing, all odds dropped before the kick off, the user has a strong mathematical and analytical pattern of betting in the exact position, as the pattern was repeated again and again, the user is a strong opinion user and is using strategy to gain leverage in the long term, which is against our T&C. If a user feels that we have done something unfair, please tell them not to hesitate to file a complaint with the Curacao gambling authorities and we will be happy to work with them to resolve the issue. Also, if he needs help getting in touch with them, please let us know and we will provide him with their contact information. We will continue to enforce our fraud prevention policies and take appropriate actions when we detect fraud or abuse.” Anyone who is into sports betting knows that this is an absurd reason for banning my account. Read accusation thread for more info and proof. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: cicadasTR on March 01, 2023, 12:01:36 PM Also have a flag against Betnomi https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3115
Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440421.0 Been trying to get a bet history + a withdrawal since October. Have tried everything at this point. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on March 01, 2023, 12:12:50 PM Also have a flag against Betnomi, not sure if I'm linking it right but it shows for me at the top: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772 Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440421.0 Been trying to get a bet history + a withdrawal since October. Have tried everything at this point. You and lesliegray have created a flag twice for the same thing. things don't work that way and it shouldn't be a witch hunt. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3119 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3115 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: cicadasTR on March 01, 2023, 12:14:23 PM Also have a flag against Betnomi, not sure if I'm linking it right but it shows for me at the top: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772 Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440421.0 Been trying to get a bet history + a withdrawal since October. Have tried everything at this point. You and lesliegray have created a flag twice for the same thing. things don't work that way and it shouldn't be a witch hunt. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3119 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3115 You'd have to ask them about it, but says 3119 has been withdrawn? Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: lesliegray on March 01, 2023, 12:22:36 PM Also have a flag against Betnomi, not sure if I'm linking it right but it shows for me at the top: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772 Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440421.0 Been trying to get a bet history + a withdrawal since October. Have tried everything at this point. You and lesliegray have created a flag twice for the same thing. things don't work that way and it shouldn't be a witch hunt. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3119 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3115 Yeah that was me. I made a mistake when creating the flag as I got the wrong reference. Thats why it's withdrawn. The flag I posted here is the correct one. Sorry about the confusion. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: cicadasTR on March 02, 2023, 10:50:19 AM Also have a flag against Betnomi, not sure if I'm linking it right but it shows for me at the top: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772 Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440421.0 Been trying to get a bet history + a withdrawal since October. Have tried everything at this point. You and lesliegray have created a flag twice for the same thing. things don't work that way and it shouldn't be a witch hunt. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3119 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3115 You'd have to ask them about it, but says 3119 has been withdrawn? So not going to take back what you said? OK Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on May 26, 2023, 12:12:50 PM User: Supreemo
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988763 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3169 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan Default Please support or oppose which you think better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: examplens on June 05, 2023, 05:40:11 PM It seems that this member is still new here and maybe he didn't get to know all the things on the forum very well, so let me help him.
User CYBER_COWBOY (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3533170) opened scam accusations 63$ Loan defaulted by Rohan Kotkar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537) Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537 Proof of loan accepted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445759.msg62144289#msg62144289 Reason: Loan default FLAG https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3175 Please support or oppose. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on June 06, 2023, 09:02:32 AM Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537 This is the wrong link. But the Flag itself links to the wrong topic, so it can't be Supported:Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. Update: I just saw you knew this already (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5455027.msg62362850#msg62362850). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: CYBER_COWBOY on June 06, 2023, 10:38:28 AM It seems that this member is still new here and maybe he didn't get to know all the things on the forum very well, so let me help him. User CYBER_COWBOY (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3533170) opened scam accusations 63$ Loan defaulted by Rohan Kotkar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537) Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2690537 Proof of loan accepted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445759.msg62144289#msg62144289 Reason: Loan default FLAG https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3175 Please support or oppose. New flag with accurate link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3179 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Stakemeharder on June 07, 2023, 05:23:49 AM User: Rollbit Razer
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3261248 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3178 Flag Type: 2 Reason: Bans user account with 10.2k funds in it without real explanation. Scam accusation link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5449402.0 Please support or oppose which you think better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Poker Player on June 12, 2023, 03:40:02 AM I guess it was going to be seen anyway, as I created the reference thread in this section, but just in case I ask for support for a type 1 flag on the creator of a fake lending service.
The thread: Reference thread for flag on fake lending service. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456093.msg62392936#msg62392936) The flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3182 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on June 30, 2023, 02:54:07 AM User: Yabes
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2548375 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3187 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan Default Please support or oppose which you think is better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on August 23, 2023, 02:02:57 AM User: Devawnm367
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1713155 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3201 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan Default Please support or oppose which you think is better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on August 23, 2023, 06:09:19 PM User: PSTNET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3548015 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3198 Flag Type: 1 Reason: SCAM Please support or oppose which you think is better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on August 24, 2023, 08:29:38 PM User: hold-coins (Alt of Devawnm367)
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2339451 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3202 Flag Type: 3 Reason: Loan Default ( By alt account) Please support or oppose which you think is better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Billo_ on August 25, 2023, 01:10:25 AM Please support flag
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3204 Flag type: 1 Scam accusation: selling various accounts like ebay, very likely stolen identity Account: ljubomir821 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=902797) Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5463403.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Helena Yu on August 25, 2023, 05:30:36 AM Please support flag I oppose your flag.Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3204 Flag type: 1 Scam accusation: selling various accounts like ebay, very likely stolen identity Account: ljubomir821 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=902797) Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5463403.0 I know you're create this flag because of there are two negative feedbacks from trusted users leaved since 5 years ago and he's still active selling digital accounts. You're using the thread that created by him as a reference in your flag, that's incorrect since there's nothing I can read and judge if he's a scammer. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on August 25, 2023, 05:37:28 AM Moreover you're using flag type 1, it's only for the user who get scammed, did you get scammed by him? if not, create flag type 3. You've got this completely wrong: type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned' Type 1 is the only Flag that can be created by anyone. Type 2 and 3 can only be created by victims.Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37 type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9 type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41 WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:' Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on August 25, 2023, 07:09:31 PM User: PSTNET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3548015 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3203 Flag Type: 2 Reason: SCAM Please support or oppose which you think is better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: DireWolfM14 on October 04, 2023, 02:20:57 PM User: harizen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=458393)
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3217 Flat type: 1 Reason: Spreading malware More info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5469184.msg62944256#msg62944256 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: FatFork on October 11, 2023, 07:12:42 AM User: PSTNET You have created flag type 2 which should be created by the victim. But you are not the victim in this case I could not understand why you have created such a type (type 2). It would be better if the victim (Maris Lunt) would create a flag that could be type 3. Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3548015 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3203 Flag Type: 2 Reason: SCAM Please support or oppose which you think is better. You were mistaken. The victim, Maris Lunt, created that flag. dkbit98 just shared the link. Maris Lunt alleges: PSTNET violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here... Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: dkbit98 on October 11, 2023, 09:02:42 AM You have created flag type 2 which should be created by the victim. But you are not the victim in this case I could not understand why you have created such a type (type 2). It would be better if the victim (Maris Lunt) would create a flag that could be type 3. Isn't it obvious who created this flag with a simple click on the link that were provided?https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/11/RPkbC.jpeg Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: tetaeridanus on October 15, 2023, 08:38:12 PM I hereby opened a flag against Stunna in the name of Stake.com after I got my 20.000$ illegally stolen from me where I was able to play casino games in a excluded account. I have gotten zero replies from any Stake.com authorites so I decided to open a flag. Thanks if you both support me or oppose me.
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3231 With respect, Tetaeridanus. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on October 16, 2023, 07:58:53 AM As a reminder:
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0). I've deleted the last 7 posts from this topic, and quoted them here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5466839.msg63002621#msg63002621). Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Bitcoin_Arena on October 21, 2023, 12:08:16 PM I am lobbying for support of this type 2 flag created by a newbie so that It becomes active. The thread was later on moved to investigations board and right after the scam accusation was created so I had to try and help me
User: PayWithAnon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3580871) Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3234 Flat type: 2 Reason: Refused to pay up for the services rendered to him More details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5470574.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on November 12, 2023, 01:29:08 AM User: Edwardard
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3240 Flat type: 3 Reason: Defaulted loan. Please support or oppose which you think better. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Billo_ on November 27, 2023, 10:56:36 PM Please support flag
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3251 Flag type: 1 Scam accusation: selling Bitcointalk accounts, Scam Account: AccountTrade (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2408858) Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222975.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Bitcoin_Arena on November 27, 2023, 11:27:08 PM Please support flag This is a wrong way to create a Trust flag. You have used the culprit's topic as a reference, which can be deleted or modified anytime. Instead, make a scam accusation and then use its link to create a flag. Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3251 Flag type: 1 Scam accusation: selling Bitcointalk accounts, Scam Account: AccountTrade (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2408858) Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222975.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: Billo_ on November 27, 2023, 11:33:19 PM Please support flag This is a wrong way to create a Trust flag. You have used the culprit's topic as a reference, which can be deleted or modified anytime. Instead, make a scam accusation and then use its link to create a flag. Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3251 Flag type: 1 Scam accusation: selling Bitcointalk accounts, Scam Account: AccountTrade (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2408858) Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222975.0 If yes, I will try to modify and come back. Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: LoyceV on November 28, 2023, 09:48:22 AM Archive link will work as well because it can't be modified or deleted, Sir? No. You should read Trust flags (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.0). If you have any other questions, that topic is the right place to ask them.Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on December 19, 2023, 11:46:14 PM User: alexout
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=141685 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3260 Flag Type: 1 Reason: He is an account seller is he is back yet again selling accounts and has scammed quite some members already. Please support flag to protect newbies Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on January 28, 2024, 11:25:00 PM User: YASBET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3492459 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3275 Flag Type: 3 Reason: From around July last year, Yas.bet has refused to refund some user's money. He did create a type 3 flag, but I noticed it's not active because no DT member supports it, yet it's a legitimate case. Please support. Full case here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5465252.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: GekkeBelg on February 09, 2024, 07:47:39 PM Hello, I would like to ask for support of my flag against the representative of the gambling website coins.game (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3575821)
Flag type 2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3280 Description: Confiscated all my 268 sports betting winnings without any explanation and not showing any willingness to solve it in the 3 weeks I have waited ever since. Scam accusation topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482075.0 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on February 25, 2024, 12:56:12 AM Flag Type: 3
Reason: Loan Defaulted Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5486476 Link of the flags:lemipawa: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3286 DaddyMonsi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3284 nydiacaskey01: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3287 mubadala: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3285 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: logfiles on March 08, 2024, 10:59:59 PM User: amanihilpert
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3580914 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3278 Flag Type: 3 Reason: user amanihilpert made off with a potential client's 0.00953184 BTC and never delivered the advertised service to him. Also, he has a habit of a looking all his ANNs which means there is something he is trying to hide. Full case here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482973 Title: Re: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! Post by: shasan on April 25, 2024, 01:58:43 AM User: Heartilly
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3295 Flag type: 3 Reason: Defaulted loan. Please support or oppose which you think is better. |
