Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!

Quote from: mosprognoz on October 14, 2019, 09:36:22 AM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 14, 2019, 09:30:12 AM

Latest false flags from Hatch Support:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872 - TwitchySeal
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873 - rhomelmabini
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874 - cyberpinoy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=872;oppose
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=873;oppose
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=874;oppose

(cheers for the recent opposition to flags against me and psycodad)

Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned?

Same here, opposed all. I am not sure if theymos is following here, maybe someone has to bring this to his attention.

Quote from: psycodad on October 14, 2019, 09:39:39 AM

Quote from: mosprognoz on October 14, 2019, 09:36:22 AM

Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned?

Same here, opposed all. I am not sure if theymos is following here, maybe someone has to bring this to his attention.

Well, theymos would probably say "the trust system is not moderated," but perhaps at least a temp ban is in order. On a side note, the project they are advertising is undoubtedly a scam, and they probably have some sort of mental disorder to boot. At least they know how to use the trust system features, even if incorrectly.

Hi, i request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=878

User @M Arif Ramadon made bounty thread for previously reported ponzi scheme Hodium
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185516.0

They have their bounty campaign going on for a few weeks on their website, but recently they added signature campaign part too.More than 20 BTT members joined so far, and new ones coming every day spreading Hodium ponzi.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192350.0

Nice, I got my first flag, also from hatch support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=164749;page=iflags

Going through all of them right now, a real pain ****

This is slightly related, so I'm posting it here too:

Quote from: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 09:39:49 AM

You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.

Quote from: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 10:22:59 AM

Please Support this flag -

Please only post here if there is a Flag.

Please Support this flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889

Signature Campaign Cheater - (Check the feedback from yahoo62278)

Quote from: Astargath on August 16, 2019, 07:11:37 PM

Btctalk name: Astargath
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459781
Rank: Hero Mmeber
Current post count: 4965
MintDice username: Astargath
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

Quote from: Bardman on September 08, 2019, 01:46:31 PM

Btctalk name : Bardman
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459805
Rank : Hero Member
Current post count : 1285
MintDice username : Bardman
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar : Yes

I wouldn't mind applying for a sr.member spot or even Full member for now.

Quote from: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 10:29:03 AM

Please Support this flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=889

Signature Campaign Cheater - (Check the feedback from yahoo62278)

Isn't the feedback left by yahoo sufficient enough?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo.

edit;

Quote from: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 11:37:23 AM

It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt.

I meant multi-accounts as in 'multi-accounting' meaning cheating bounties/sigs with alts. Still, i believe flags should be reserved primarily for scammers and the tag left by yahoo is a pretty significant warning by itself.

Quote from: morvillz7z on October 19, 2019, 10:47:26 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo.

Agreed. I see no direct reason to "believe that anyone dealing with Astargath is at a high risk of losing money", as stated in the Flag.

Quote from: morvillz7z on October 19, 2019, 10:47:26 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall a flag being opened against multi-accounts so far. It's too much imo.

It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt.

Quote from: LoyceV on October 19, 2019, 11:08:17 AM

Agreed. I see no direct reason to "believe that anyone dealing with Astargath is at a high risk of losing money", as stated in the Flag.

he tried to earn $35 by cheating with alts. What's the guarantee that he would not run away if someone trust him with money?

Quote from: Altcoin Reviewer on October 19, 2019, 11:37:23 AM

It's not about multi-account it's about the cheating attempt.

The negative feedback left by Yahoo is more than enough for such a scenario. Don't sweat yourself off over a trust flag mate. Anyone sensible would be able to notice that the accounts are alts and the person behind them tried to cheat on a bounty.

If we go one creating flags for issues like this then trust flags will become meaningless. I have seen so many accounts that have been busted for cheating on bounties... probably thousands of them.
Are you going to create flags for all of them?

Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags. No brain required.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=868;oppose
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=867;oppose
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=865;oppose

Check the links, oppose the flag. Easy.

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 19, 2019, 05:33:31 PM

Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags.

There are 82 Flags with broken Reference links. I made a convenient list of those: Trust Flag viewer: all Flags without a valid Reference topic

Quote from: LoyceV on October 19, 2019, 06:03:36 PM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 19, 2019, 05:33:31 PM

Flags (for whatever reason) that have broken links, aka "no reference" flags.

There are 82 Flags with broken Reference links. I made a convenient list of those: Trust Flag viewer: all Flags without a valid Reference topic

If there are flags with broken reference links then by default those flags be removed or auto-deleted. Just my opinion Wink

Hi, i request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=901

tl;dr

Textbook shitcoin that currently has IEO on P2PB2B with all kind of abuse (plagiarized content, fake team description, fake profiles in WP)

Please check this and support the flag because this exchange is extremely shady and the exchange owner is no behaving in psychotic manner making all sorts of wild allegations.

Bituary Exchange thread full of sock-puppet newbies: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194717.0

Proof of selective scamming by Bituary Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195893.0

Proof of psychotic behaviour by Bituary Exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195893.msg52884581#msg52884581

More proof of psychotic behaviour by Bituary Exchange attempting revenge: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196172.0

What sort of exchange freezes a user account when he makes a withdrawal. Then is forced to send KYC. Then is told to deposit more BTC in order to allow the withdrawal to take place and then is told to deposit another 1 BTC otherwise account will remain frozen and no withdrawals will be allowed? A scam exchange would do that. I feel sorry for the victim of this scam because having 0.9185 BTC stolen is hard to get over.

This thread has the screenshots showing the Bituary Exchange scammers in full flow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194717.msg52872597#msg52872597

---
https://ibb.co/JFL3cyG
---

---
https://ibb.co/0G69f29
---

---
https://ibb.co/WVFQ1Cb
---

---
https://ibb.co/0JwTQzh
---

Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312

Quote from: JollyGood on October 26, 2019, 12:48:32 PM

Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312;page=iflags

Please change the link, and link directly to the flag. Depending on custom trust settings, users might not see anything. I see nothing there.

Quote from: Bituary Exchange on October 26, 2019, 12:56:45 PM

We are not responsible for users talking in our thread.

I am responsible for users posting here, so I've deleted your post. This is not the place to challenge accusations, please do that in the Flag's reference thread.

Quote from: LoyceV on October 26, 2019, 01:54:28 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on October 26, 2019, 12:48:32 PM

Please support this flag because user Sinenkiy has been selective scammed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312;page=iflags

Please change the link, and link directly to the flag. Depending on custom trust settings, users might not see anything. I see nothing there.

Quote from: Bituary Exchange on October 26, 2019, 12:56:45 PM

We are not responsible for users talking in our thread.

I am responsible for users posting here, so I've deleted your post. This is not the place to challenge accusations, please do that in the Flag's reference thread.

Thank you Loyce, well spotted. I updated the link in my previous post.

It is here too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312

	Author	Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! (Read 49905 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (30 posts by 4+ users deleted.)