Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: actmyname on June 24, 2019, 08:25:00 PM



Title: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: actmyname on June 24, 2019, 08:25:00 PM
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.

This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!

After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users (http://te) like (http://cs) these (http://ha).

LoyceV can serve as an external member. They can act as a proxy by creating lots of analytics threads and redirect the merit to our accounts. The Russian local forum is quite lenient on account sales, so we can direct our approach there.

a joke it was, and how we laughed


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 08:30:22 PM
The quotes link outside the forum. Be careful.

EDIT: I scanned the links on virus total, and they seem to lead to nothing, but I have lots of scripts blocked. Am I missing something?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: Steamtyme on June 24, 2019, 08:31:16 PM
That Asshole. I can't believe they didn't save that for PM's but I guess hiding on a local board is close.

Great detective work, never give up you.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: marlboroza on June 24, 2019, 08:51:05 PM
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.

This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!

After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) like (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) these (https://bit.ly/18gECvy).

After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it.

Good work actmyname for posting this.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 08:57:43 PM
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.

This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!

After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) like (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) these (https://bit.ly/18gECvy).

After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it.

Good work actmyname for posting this.

Can some one include a direct forum link please? Why are link shorteners being used?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: marlboroza on June 24, 2019, 09:00:39 PM
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.

This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!

After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) like (https://bit.ly/18gECvy) these (https://bit.ly/18gECvy).

After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it.

Good work actmyname for posting this.

Can some one include a direct forum link please? Why are link shorteners being used?
Ok, that's it. I am un-ingnoring you.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 09:02:38 PM
For real?

I find it difficult to detect sarcasm online.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/in6mnJNYjGKpq/giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5d113a502e7272366fe0e849&rid=giphy.gif


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on June 24, 2019, 09:05:50 PM
Um....what's with the Rick Rolled Youtube link?  What am I missing here?  

This appears to be a joke based on that link, though I did not click on the other one.  WTF would minerjones or Lauda care about merits, really?  It's not like either one needs them.  Certainly not enough to do something like what's posted here.  Will watch with bated breath.

I find it difficult to detect sarcasm online.
I find it near impossible sometimes, but this would not be sarcasm but a prank, a spoof, a bad joke.

Edit:  Looks like they're all Rickrolls.  Not sure what kind of laugh actmyname is going for here, but heh heh.  This forum has gone insane.

Does one of the links lead to Rick? I can't get any of them to work, but I am not clicking them without tons of script restrictions.
Really?  The link to the posts and one other both lead to something that should have died in 2011 I think.  This is a joke.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 09:07:18 PM
Um....what's with the Rick Rolled Youtube link?  What am I missing here? 

This appears to be a joke based on that link, though I did not click on the other one.  WTF would minerjones or Lauda care about merits, really?  It's not like either one needs them.  Certainly not enough to do something like what's posted here.  Will watch with bated breath.

Does one of the links lead to Rick? I can't get any of them to work, but I am not clicking them without tons of script restrictions.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 09:07:53 PM
Um....what's with the Rick Rolled Youtube link?  What am I missing here?  

This appears to be a joke based on that link, though I did not click on the other one.  WTF would minerjones or Lauda care about merits, really?  It's not like either one needs them.  Certainly not enough to do something like what's posted here.  Will watch with bated breath.

I find it difficult to detect sarcasm online.
I find it near impossible sometimes, but this would not be sarcasm but a prank, a spoof, a bad joke.

That’s what I thought, it’s a joke surely!


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 09:17:41 PM
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 09:20:27 PM
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.

I don’t know either of them personally but you’d think that surely, their accounts & reputations here are way too important to risk with a bull shit stunt like this.

Like I said I’m leaning towards thinking it’s a joke at the moment. Let’s see what develops though.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 09:21:48 PM
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.

I don’t know either of them personally but you’d think that surely, their accounts & reputations here are way too important to risk with a bull shit stunt like this.

Like I said I’m leaning towards thinking it’s a joke at the moment. Let’s see what develops though.

While I wouldn't doubt Lauda is up to this kind of crap, I have my doubts about Minerjones being up to this kind of activity, but no one is providing anything but broken links as far as I can tell.

EDIT: the links have been edited several times. One of the originals was https://bit.ly/31RMJyx  the other https://www.shorturl.at/vDJP7


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: Last of the V8s on June 24, 2019, 09:33:10 PM
Can't say I'm shocked by some of the revelations in this thread ::)


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 24, 2019, 10:23:11 PM
I hate getting rickrolled, and it seems to happen on a weekly basis.

Yellow flag for actmyname pending...

https://pics.me.me/things-rick-astley-will-never-do-give-you-up-let-7224415.png


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: Quickseller on June 24, 2019, 11:04:31 PM
EDIT: the links have been edited several times. One of the originals was https://bit.ly/31RMJyx  the other https://www.shorturl.at/vDJP7
Both URLs, according to multiple URL expanders I used, redirect to "shorturl.at". The domain was registered on May 28, less than a month ago.

For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
I think this is the point.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: suchmoon on June 24, 2019, 11:20:59 PM
Phew, I didn't get rolled this time.



For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
I think this is the point.

Just because you two have 8-foot 2x4s up your asses doesn't mean others can't enjoy actmyname's quirky humor.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 24, 2019, 11:25:03 PM
Phew, I didn't get rolled this time.



For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
I think this is the point.

Just because you two have 8-foot 2x4s up your asses doesn't mean others can't enjoy actmyname's quirky humor.

Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects.

A personal message just for me? You shouldn't have.

Code:
[quote author=actmyname link=topic=5158058.msg51588901#msg51588901 date=1561407900]
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.

[b][size=15pt]This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue![/size][/b]

[quote="[url=http://oh]minerjones on November 05, 2018, 06:33:11 PM[/url]"]After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit [url=http://te]users[/url] [url=http://cs]like[/url] [url=http://ha]these[/url].[/quote]

[quote="[url=http://re]Lauda on November 05, 2018, 07:14:48 PM[/url]"]LoyceV can serve as an external member. They can act as a proxy by creating lots of analytics threads and redirect the merit to our accounts. The Russian local forum is quite lenient on account sales, so we can direct our approach there.[/quote][hr][right][sub][sub][sub][sub][sup][sup][sup][sub][size=1px][i][color=beige]a joke it was, and how we laughed
[/quote]


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: suchmoon on June 24, 2019, 11:53:35 PM
Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects.

If only there was a feature that would allow snowflakes to ignore stuff that alarms them...


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 25, 2019, 12:27:39 AM
@TECSHARE, @Quickseller,

Rejoice in the fact that no one here is vicious enough to hide a link to THIS MONSTROSITY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwTZ2xpQwpA)!


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 25, 2019, 01:11:54 AM
Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects.

If only there was a feature that would allow snowflakes to ignore stuff that alarms them...

Yeah, because the best way to deal with false alarms is to ignore all alarms right? But this joke sure got me shook according to you, because I object clearly because this scares me, not because I think it is a bad idea.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: SaltySpitoon on June 25, 2019, 01:23:30 AM
Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

*edit*
Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: xolxol on June 25, 2019, 05:09:51 AM
Im sure if a normal guy posted that surely he will get tagged,these people shouldnt be given power in this forum.Abusive people will always be abusive,if this is suppose to be a big joke it aint funny

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 merits looks familiar?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: LoyceV on June 25, 2019, 06:49:18 AM
LoyceV can serve as an external member. They can act as a proxy by creating lots of analytics threads and redirect the merit to our accounts.
That doesn't sound like something a member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club would do.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on June 25, 2019, 06:52:01 AM
I KNEW IT! THE GANG IS REAL!


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 25, 2019, 06:53:50 AM
Im sure if a normal guy posted that surely he will get tagged,these people shouldnt be given power in this forum.Abusive people will always be abusive,if this is suppose to be a big joke it aint funny

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 merits looks familiar?

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: xolxol on June 25, 2019, 08:43:57 AM
What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?
I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: marlboroza on June 25, 2019, 02:20:36 PM
I checked links again and seems OP changed them, they are placed in this order:

http://oh
http://te
http://cs
http://ha
http://re

Looks like a code or something.

Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.
What you have described sounds exactly like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 25, 2019, 02:42:45 PM
What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?
I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

I think you're mistaking normal for humorless, they are not synonymous.  It's quite normal to have a twisted sense of humor, just look at POTUS for a perfect example.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: bones261 on June 25, 2019, 02:50:33 PM
What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?
I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: SaltySpitoon on June 25, 2019, 02:54:49 PM
I checked links again and seems OP changed them, they are placed in this order:

http://oh
http://te
http://cs
http://ha
http://re

Looks like a code or something.

Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.
What you have described sounds exactly like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling

Except now, whenever someone does a forum search to see if there have been any scam accusations against Lauda or MinerJones, they'll find this thread, and have to spend however much time it requires to read through it and judge for themselves whether its a joke or not. As you can tell from some of the posts here, its not that obvious, especially to those who don't know that you can falsify quotes.

I didn't click on any links, I came here, saw the quotes, and read the first and second page of the thread. I realized it was not real when I got to The Pharmacist's post.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: bones261 on June 25, 2019, 03:10:45 PM
Except now, whenever someone does a forum search to see if there have been any scam accusations against Lauda or MinerJones, they'll find this thread, and have to spend however much time it requires to read through it and judge for themselves whether its a joke or not. As you can tell from some of the posts here, its not that obvious, especially to those who don't know that you can falsify quotes.

I didn't click on any links, I came here, saw the quotes, and read the first and second page of the thread. I realized it was not real when I got to The Pharmacist's post.

    Well I ended up getting rickrolled in less than 5 seconds.  :D   I guess the lesson for me is to always double check where a link actually points to before clicking it.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 25, 2019, 05:25:34 PM
What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?
I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

I think you're mistaking normal for humorless, they are not synonymous.  It's quite normal to have a twisted sense of humor, just look at POTUS for a perfect example.

I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore. Also I am a big fan of all kinds of comedy, and this really wasn't funny, it was just low quality bait that resulted in nothing that entertaining. Also as I already explained it sets a very bad precedent regarding false alarms. Funny how tagging users over petty things is serious business, but things like this that create actual security risks are just a joke. It just goes to show how much some of these users actually care about the user base here, caring when it serves them and making a joke out of the place for their personal entertainment when it doesn't.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: xolxol on June 26, 2019, 04:28:55 AM
What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?
I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: bones261 on June 26, 2019, 04:47:10 AM

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?
What "abuse?" This particular account is not Lauda's alt account. I doubt she sold it to actmyname. Also, she is not a merit source, so she can distribute her smerit how she sees fit, provided it's not an her alt or selling it. Also, if this is somehow part of an "account farm," actmyname is doing a shitty job, since he announces that it is an alt account in the trust comments.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: BitcoinSupremo on June 26, 2019, 05:16:01 PM
Joke or not the gang is real, the gang of BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA has totally infected this forum. I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive under this new "flag" term from theymos and theymos says that if someone opens up a flag without facts needs to be removed from DT ASAP and I fully agree with him.

Hey bullshit propaganda what are you up to beside giving non valid negative feedback ?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 26, 2019, 06:11:59 PM
I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: bones261 on June 26, 2019, 06:33:38 PM
I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

Fortunately, BitcoinSupremo's post about beating up gay people was either deleted by staff or he deleted it himself.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: xolxol on June 26, 2019, 08:06:18 PM

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?
What "abuse?" This particular account is not Lauda's alt account. I doubt she sold it to actmyname. Also, she is not a merit source, so she can distribute her smerit how she sees fit, provided it's not an her alt or selling it. Also, if this is somehow part of an "account farm," actmyname is doing a shitty job, since he announces that it is an alt account in the trust comments.
what abuse?are u fuckin blind???not lauda's account ? yeah because its his allies' ?did you clicked the profie or not?


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: BitcoinSupremo on June 26, 2019, 09:07:11 PM
I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

Fortunately, BitcoinSupremo's post about beating up gay people was either deleted by staff or he deleted it himself.

As far as I know flags are not valid for spreading homophobia or any shit you like to accuse me of, flags are valid only if money is involved and people have been scammed or did I miss something, you can enlighten me as I am not that active, I am too high from btc price going up and from my AWESOME thread which I am making money myself together with the ones who follow me so I am not that updated anymore. I just post a tip in the morning and that's it almost everyday except days like this where I have time to write and read the forum a bit more.
I want everybody to have as much btc as possible and I do not post abusive non valid feedback nor in anyway I try to obstacle anyone to make btc or crypto here like the great BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA GANG has done for I don't even know how many years now, signatures are monopolized by a few individuals and I see that their style of conditions is implemented in almost every new manager wanna be. This as always leads to more and more centralization and it will only damage the forum and bitcoin in the long run. Everyone should be allowed in signature campaigns, that is the bottom line if we want to truly have an open decentralized environment. For me you see that I don't care much about signature as long as btc price is over 10.000 , I turned on my miners and more than 30.000 EUR in btc which if I were the bad guy everybody in the BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA GANG is talking about I would have bought a gazillion accounts but no I want to show that I don't do things against the forum health while the GANG operates strictly towards their own benefit and do not give a single fuck about the forum health.

Cheers.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: marlboroza on June 26, 2019, 09:17:27 PM
I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive
Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

Fortunately, BitcoinSupremo's post about beating up gay people was either deleted by staff or he deleted it himself.
You mean post #17 https://web.archive.org/web/20190510005908/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141126.0;all ?

I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore.
Can you show example of average unknown user rickrolled someone and got tag after that?

I am too high from btc price going up
You shouldn't post when you are too high  :)


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 26, 2019, 10:28:38 PM
You mean post #17 https://web.archive.org/web/20190510005908/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141126.0;all

One of my neighbors is a retired SFPD lieutenant, in his late 50's, gym rat, black belt in three martial arts, and queer as a three dollar bill.  There's no doubt in my mind anyone who underestimates that "pussy" would have his ass handed to him before he time to be surprised. 


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 26, 2019, 11:46:04 PM
I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore.
Can you show example of average unknown user rickrolled someone and got tag after that?

You know damned well this is not about a rick roll and is about a false accusation Captain Semantics.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: nutildah on June 27, 2019, 04:52:24 AM
Jesus H. It was meant to be a joke. A joke! It may not have been the funniest thing in the world but its at a level of trolling the forum is not used to. I found the reactions to it to be quite humorous.

You know damned well this is not about a rick roll and is about a false accusation Captain Semantics.

Did you just call somebody "Captain Semantics" after using the words "false accusation"?  ::) ::) ::)

Quick somebody ask the 'falsely accused' if they give a flying F.

Also:

Also I am a big fan of all kinds of comedy

I find this hard to believe unless "all kinds" means everything from Dennis Miller to Rush Limbaugh.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 27, 2019, 05:51:53 AM
Jesus H. It was meant to be a joke. A joke! It may not have been the funniest thing in the world but its at a level of trolling the forum is not used to. I found the reactions to it to be quite humorous.

You know damned well this is not about a rick roll and is about a false accusation Captain Semantics.

Did you just call somebody "Captain Semantics" after using the words "false accusation"?  ::) ::) ::)

Quick somebody ask the 'falsely accused' if they give a flying F.

Also:

Also I am a big fan of all kinds of comedy

I find this hard to believe unless "all kinds" means everything from Dennis Miller to Rush Limbaugh.

Hey look who couldn't restrain themselves and stopped pretending to ignore me already. The fact that it was meant to be a joke is irrelevant. What was funny about it? LMFAO people asked questions and took him at his word, THAT'S FUCKING HILARIOUS! Or is the real joke that anyone bothered to take actmyname seriously at any point? You are right, we should just assume anything he says is a joke and is totally bullshit from now on.

Yeah, because that is what it was, a false accusation. Intent aside, that is EXACTLY what it was. You know damn well the objection is not the fact that there was a rick roll, the objection is that making fake accusations against members who are entrusted with large amounts of money from many users is a very stupid precedent to set, and creates a clear security risk that could delay reaction to any real reports in the future, causing people losses. It is irrelevant if the accused like it or not, it effects the entire forum.

Also... Rush Limbaugh is a comic? I learn more an more about the delusional caricature of me you hold in your mind every day. Lol fucking Rush Limbaugh. What a tool you both are.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: marlboroza on June 27, 2019, 01:17:31 PM
I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore.
Can you show example of average unknown user rickrolled someone and got tag after that?

You know damned well this is not about a rick roll and is about a false accusation Captain Semantics.
Now you think you are inside my head.

Crazy.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: nutildah on June 27, 2019, 01:31:49 PM
What was funny about it? LMFAO people asked questions and took him at his word, THAT'S FUCKING HILARIOUS!

Glad we're on the same page.

It is irrelevant if the accused like it or not, it effects the entire forum.

https://iam1in4.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/This-affects-all-of-us.jpg

Also... Rush Limbaugh is a comic? I learn more an more about the delusional caricature of me you hold in your mind every day.

I don't think he's a comic, the caricature of you in my mind does.

Edit: You know, I've done some thinking about it, and you're right. This is serious. As far as I can tell, this is the first time in the history of the forum that Lauda and minerjones have been falsely accused of anything.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: TECSHARE on June 27, 2019, 03:50:04 PM
I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore.
Can you show example of average unknown user rickrolled someone and got tag after that?

You know damned well this is not about a rick roll and is about a false accusation Captain Semantics.
Now you think you are inside my head.

Crazy.

Either you are arguing you are mildly retarded and genuinely believe people are objecting to a rick roll, or you are just pretending to shift the subject away to another topic. Which is it?


What was funny about it? LMFAO people asked questions and took him at his word, THAT'S FUCKING HILARIOUS!

Glad we're on the same page.

It is irrelevant if the accused like it or not, it effects the entire forum.

...

Also... Rush Limbaugh is a comic? I learn more an more about the delusional caricature of me you hold in your mind every day.

I don't think he's a comic, the caricature of you in my mind does.

Edit: You know, I've done some thinking about it, and you're right. This is serious. As far as I can tell, this is the first time in the history of the forum that Lauda and minerjones have been falsely accused of anything.

Interesting, the forum is such a serious place when you have an opponent to smear, but otherwise it is just a big joke to you people unless it serves your preferred narrative. The difference between this accusation and the others is this isn't just a flimsy accusation, it is openly, intentionally, and admittedly frivolous. People have a lot invested in this place, their reputation shouldn't be your plaything children. This whole thing demonstrates the mentality many of you approach this forum with quite well.


Title: Re: Indisputable Evidence of Corruption
Post by: xolxol on July 05, 2019, 04:07:55 AM
what happened to this thread? lauda has clearly abusing the merit system https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 probably an alt account of his colleagues.
remove all lauda's privileges! system abuser!