Indisputable Evidence of Corruption

[TECSHARE]

Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects.

If only there was a feature that would allow snowflakes to ignore stuff that alarms them...

Yeah, because the best way to deal with false alarms is to ignore all alarms right? But this joke sure got me shook according to you, because I object clearly because this scares me, not because I think it is a bad idea.

[1715013354]

1715013354

[SaltySpitoon]

Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

*edit*
Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.

[xolxol]

Im sure if a normal guy posted that surely he will get tagged,these people shouldnt be given power in this forum.Abusive people will always be abusive,if this is suppose to be a big joke it aint funny

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 merits looks familiar?

[LoyceV]

LoyceV can serve as an external member. They can act as a proxy by creating lots of analytics threads and redirect the merit to our accounts.

That doesn't sound like something a member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club would do.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I KNEW IT! THE GANG IS REAL!

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Im sure if a normal guy posted that surely he will get tagged,these people shouldnt be given power in this forum.Abusive people will always be abusive,if this is suppose to be a big joke it aint funny

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 merits looks familiar?

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

[xolxol]

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

[marlboroza]

I checked links again and seems OP changed them, they are placed in this order:

http://oh
http://te
http://cs
http://ha
http://re

Looks like a code or something.

Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.

What you have described sounds exactly like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling

[DireWolfM14]

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

I think you're mistaking normal for humorless, they are not synonymous.  It's quite normal to have a twisted sense of humor, just look at POTUS for a perfect example.

[bones261]

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.

[SaltySpitoon]

I checked links again and seems OP changed them, they are placed in this order:

http://oh
http://te
http://cs
http://ha
http://re

Looks like a code or something.

Going to have to 3rd Tec and Quickseller on this one, its not a funny joke. False accusations that are not 100% obviously a joke are bad people stuff.

Not leaving negative feedback over this, but it was annoying enough to consider it. People make mistakes with taboos in discourse communities, whether you learn that a bunch of people would be pissed off by this type of thing will decide if its a lesson learned or it becomes a problem.

What you have described sounds exactly like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling

Except now, whenever someone does a forum search to see if there have been any scam accusations against Lauda or MinerJones, they'll find this thread, and have to spend however much time it requires to read through it and judge for themselves whether its a joke or not. As you can tell from some of the posts here, its not that obvious, especially to those who don't know that you can falsify quotes.

I didn't click on any links, I came here, saw the quotes, and read the first and second page of the thread. I realized it was not real when I got to The Pharmacist's post.

[bones261]

Except now, whenever someone does a forum search to see if there have been any scam accusations against Lauda or MinerJones, they'll find this thread, and have to spend however much time it requires to read through it and judge for themselves whether its a joke or not. As you can tell from some of the posts here, its not that obvious, especially to those who don't know that you can falsify quotes.

I didn't click on any links, I came here, saw the quotes, and read the first and second page of the thread. I realized it was not real when I got to The Pharmacist's post.

    Well I ended up getting rickrolled in less than 5 seconds.     I guess the lesson for me is to always double check where a link actually points to before clicking it.

[TECSHARE]

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

I think you're mistaking normal for humorless, they are not synonymous.  It's quite normal to have a twisted sense of humor, just look at POTUS for a perfect example.

I think his point is the average unknown user could easily catch a tag for this kind of behavior, but the Op is one of the "special" ones that the forum mall cops see fit to ignore. Also I am a big fan of all kinds of comedy, and this really wasn't funny, it was just low quality bait that resulted in nothing that entertaining. Also as I already explained it sets a very bad precedent regarding false alarms. Funny how tagging users over petty things is serious business, but things like this that create actual security risks are just a joke. It just goes to show how much some of these users actually care about the user base here, caring when it serves them and making a joke out of the place for their personal entertainment when it doesn't.

[xolxol]

What is a normal guy, in relation to bitcointalk.org?

Who is normal?
Who is not normal?

I know you're an idiot but dont embrace it,normal guys are the ones who has no power here,DT member vs normies? pathethic moron.

you saw my post,but you didnt see the merit abuse of lauda,double standard guys like you wont see it.

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?

[bones261]

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?

What "abuse?" This particular account is not Lauda's alt account. I doubt she sold it to actmyname. Also, she is not a merit source, so she can distribute her smerit how she sees fit, provided it's not an her alt or selling it. Also, if this is somehow part of an "account farm," actmyname is doing a shitty job, since he announces that it is an alt account in the trust comments.

[BitcoinSupremo]

Joke or not the gang is real, the gang of BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA has totally infected this forum. I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive under this new "flag" term from theymos and theymos says that if someone opens up a flag without facts needs to be removed from DT ASAP and I fully agree with him.

Hey bullshit propaganda what are you up to beside giving non valid negative feedback ?

[DireWolfM14]

I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

[bones261]

I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

Fortunately, BitcoinSupremo's post about beating up gay people was either deleted by staff or he deleted it himself.

[xolxol]

       What merit abuse of Lauda? The OP is obviously joking. When you click on either quote, it directs you to getting Rickrolled, not to actual posts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 does it ring the bell?

What "abuse?" This particular account is not Lauda's alt account. I doubt she sold it to actmyname. Also, she is not a merit source, so she can distribute her smerit how she sees fit, provided it's not an her alt or selling it. Also, if this is somehow part of an "account farm," actmyname is doing a shitty job, since he announces that it is an alt account in the trust comments.

what abuse?are u fuckin blind???not lauda's account ? yeah because its his allies' ?did you clicked the profie or not?

[BitcoinSupremo]

I wonder what flag they can open against me since I have not scammed anyone nor have done anything abusive

Spreading homophobia is abusive.  If you want you can go flag, flog, or fapfap yourself for that.

Fortunately, BitcoinSupremo's post about beating up gay people was either deleted by staff or he deleted it himself.

As far as I know flags are not valid for spreading homophobia or any shit you like to accuse me of, flags are valid only if money is involved and people have been scammed or did I miss something, you can enlighten me as I am not that active, I am too high from btc price going up and from my AWESOME thread which I am making money myself together with the ones who follow me so I am not that updated anymore. I just post a tip in the morning and that's it almost everyday except days like this where I have time to write and read the forum a bit more.
I want everybody to have as much btc as possible and I do not post abusive non valid feedback nor in anyway I try to obstacle anyone to make btc or crypto here like the great BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA GANG has done for I don't even know how many years now, signatures are monopolized by a few individuals and I see that their style of conditions is implemented in almost every new manager wanna be. This as always leads to more and more centralization and it will only damage the forum and bitcoin in the long run. Everyone should be allowed in signature campaigns, that is the bottom line if we want to truly have an open decentralized environment. For me you see that I don't care much about signature as long as btc price is over 10.000 , I turned on my miners and more than 30.000 EUR in btc which if I were the bad guy everybody in the BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA GANG is talking about I would have bought a gazillion accounts but no I want to show that I don't do things against the forum health while the GANG operates strictly towards their own benefit and do not give a single fuck about the forum health.

Cheers.