Bitcoin Forum

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

Well, you've said it correctly.

---

Most investors would rely to a reliable exchange and has high liquidity because they've learned a lot from the past year with ICO's. It's basically the new trend but still there has some precautions that has to be measured before investing.

---

These popular exchanges are doing it and investors are also meticulous in picking the IEO that they would invest, if I'm into IEO's why would even I'll invest to the project that's held on a not so popular exchange? I'm aware that success rate is lower.

You may right in the point of liquidity , IEO in big exchange has a chance to get more investors and attentions but, you miss very important point, what about the projects run IEO, will you participate in the project because it is run on big exchange?
I should check the project carefully, not all the projects can success even in big exchanges.
And in the other side you can find very good projects could not run IEO in big exchanges, so it may go to small exchanges one.
Exchanges never make the projects success.

That's why the small exchange site is not a good place to participate in IEO dude. A big exchange has a lot of needs to create a pump just like hype and demand. As far as i know, we can take a look at how so many people are still playing IEO at those big exchange sites because they can earn huge amount instantly but it's not always. Some times there will be a small coin that can make even more than 50x without any exchange site to launch its IEO just like Qdao. The role of the exchange site matters a lot in this case.

The Team pays a lot of fees just to get on tha top exchanges and that’s a good way to create the hype. This is an advantage if you have huge capital to pay for your marketing expenses. Well, this is just like an ICO at a very updated version, bad projects is still meant to be failed.

Of course, with many investors and high volumes of many tokens on top exchanges, they can make a higher possibility for successful IEOs. Commonly, investors will trust more on the IEOs that provide on top exchanges. They believe the top exchanges won't cooperate with bad projects that can bring negative impacts to the exchanges. While on small or unpopular exchanges, they possibly don't really care about the quality of the projects [IEO project].

What do you expect? Big exchanges started this trend of IEO's launchpad that's why it really took the market by storm and could kill the ICO business model. And the good thing is that investors money is somewhat safe here, because the likelihood of big exchanges running scam projects are slim to none. For smaller exchanges, it boils down to trust, we might seen some smaller exchanges that can put up a challenge if they run a successful IEO because it could result to a "trust". We all know that this is a cutt throat business, if you are small then you have to think big in order to survived.

developers team prefer to allocate their marketing budget to IEO listing fee.with listing in best exchanges it could attract much investors joined in their projects, although actually it just temporary hype.and stability depend on how they work to deliver products to their investors and community.this startegy usually work well when they allowed to list in best exchanges.

Very well-said. For big exchanges, they don't have hard time selling those coins but for smaller exchanges, if they did a good job handling an IEO, it means additional trust point on them. Because if not, they will not get clients on the next set of project. But I don't believe that a project will always be successful afterwards if handled in big exchange. I've seen several projects that still decline their value after couple of weeks of trading in the exchange. And I guess, that's a normal trend nowadays.

It is actually the not a game, but a fact. One of the criteria that we must consider when going to participate in IEO is the selection of the exchange. You are true that the top exchange will always get the first seat. It makes sense because all investors will trust the project that lists their token or coin in the top exchange, at least in a good exchange with a good review, trading volume, and also active community (although still not the top one). For, we will not put any big risk again to ut our money into the worthless project.
COmmonly, token or coin n the top exchange will be easy to reach the good liquidity and trading volume.

Of course, IEO projects will start and entrust the project with top , trusted and established exchanges. IEO is in a testing stage, they will not gonna take a risk into small and untrusted exchanges. They are choosing the best exchanges with high security and great platform. With this, there's  a win-win situation in the future for both IEO and exchanges. For the exchanges, it will attract new investors and for the IEO projects it seems we can see success and positive results.

Yes,you right. At the first time binance launch their 1st IEO and successful many other exchange want follow them and with profit with fast. Binance IEO really hard to join because they have strict rules so who's not get what they want after that they join other exchange with big expectation. At the end they just disappointed because IEO failed. They forget to research because of IEO FOMO

Then, small market players( exchanges) will do actions immediately otherwise, they lost its credibility.
Reputed and high volume exchanges will rally in the market and might dominate the others. The competition getting stiff and investors are also selective to what exchanges that can make a great deal with them. And of course, I'll choose those exchange that could possibly gives what we expected to be.

That is because smaller exchanges are faking their token sale result. There were threads here before how IDAX were fooling IEO investors with faking the volume then claiming it was a successful token sale.

the only reason this may seem true is because IEO is the new version of the same failing scheme which game it a temporary life. and it is showing some returns because of that and also the fact that the market has been filled with a lot of newbies who were desperate to make back all the money they lost over the past 2 years (most of them lost around 85% to 95% of their capital).
so big exchanges with a lot of of this type of desperate newbies could target them directly and take their money away from them easier than an ICO could do these days.

Well said. The projects under the wings of top exchangers can really pump due to high liquidity. I think it is more than just investing. Since IEO on Binance really got hype many exchange follow their path and now even small exchangers even their liquidity is low is trying to open an IEO option which is not good if youre a small exchange cause people wanna trade and will trust bigger exchange even the project they promoted isnt that great. Meaning popularity of exchange can really affect which is good to invest here but with some coming from hype but not from due diligence.

Correct. That's why IEO is the best upgrade to ICO. Compared to ICO where you'll have to wait months before getting into an exchange, IEO will to that for you in no time and you'll also get a nice volume for it. Most IEO will succeed because of the system behind it.

Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.

yes I too feel this if it on the top exchange that the chances are on the higher side  if it is on the small exchanges than also not issues but the project has to be good

Of course, according to me, the success of IEO is based on the Volume on the Exchange. If the volume is top 5 - 10, I think it's good to follow IEO, but yes we have to look at the project, good or not for the future of the project, the more IEO Top exchange the better you get the profit

The better the exchanges, the higher the listing fee, and it depends on the team itself whether they go for big exchanges or not, at some point i agree on your statement, big exchanges have a large group of community compared to the new ones, that is may be the reason why some IEO are not successful.

if you think about it, everything is a game for top exchanges simply because they have more power in the market.  the most common thing we always see is their control over the pump and dumps of different altcoins just because they own the majority of the market share (volume). for example a couple of years ago when they forked ETH and the foundation was dumping ETC to kill it, poloniex which was the biggest exchange of the time blocked their accounts and prevented ETC's death because they had the power to do it.

It's somehow true and it's correct for projects who did their IEO on smaller exchanges very rarely succeed with their fundraising activities. The top ones are still Binance, they pretty much have the biggest volume out of everyone and you can find projects there that has an actual product (https://www.contentos.io/?utm_source=lx) and real partnerships, something that can bring you ROI in the long run. But I would say that projects who are making efforts will always make it's way, though it's gonna be a difficult road for them especially if they don't have the budget to enter big exchanges.

The top exchange already has the trust of investors and a lot of data that refer to recommend IEO from the top exchange, I have seen IEO in Binance with a very high ROI, while IEO in small exchanges suffered a lot of losses and even dropped dramatically to disappear.

indeed a large volume of trade is more favored in IEO because they have the ability to increase the liquidity of new tokens.  but a large exchange does not guarantee that a successful project might even increase in price for a short time.  better analyze first before investing IEO don't overly trust exchanges I am personally more interested in seeing real products and innovations even though they are on a small exchange

They all have benefits, the project who offer the IEO and the exchange. as an investor perspective, of course, I would rather join IEO on a big exchange, but it's not true if the small exchange will stop me to invest. Again its more about the project itself.

After failure of ICO's, most of the exchanges launching IEO's and big exchanges are getting good success rate but small exchanges have not good rate of success, I think small exchanges adding all projects that do not have worth and people are buying for good investment and want to get good profit, as you can see LATOKEN, Exmarket and some other exchanges not properly checking IEO and launching every project. so we don't invest in small exchanges.

That's true, many IEO project successful on top exchange, because top exchange like Binance, Huobi and Okex have liquidity and can pump the coin after listing. I am never invest IEO on small exchange because their have more risk and can't be trusted.

Not only because of liquidity but because of the credibility because top exchange sites like the ones that you list above are known be legit and running for year's . Smaller exchange can still do thier best to improve their platform and they can offer something that is new and unique so that they can attract fellow traders and hopefully they don't make any dissapointment when building a reputation

I'm not disclosing any chances that those Low volume exchange will exceed in the future nor to think that they can't be trusted anymore. The competition may strong and  traders will give there way into the most reputed exchanges than to risk their money to the others.  
But not just to rely with them because they have a good market reviews, we should also be taking care of our investment and to have better result.

I agree with you, most of the IEO held in global exchange like binance and bittrex tend to be highly successful and some of them sold out in less than two minutes, but the IEO conducted on small exchanges takes very long time without the team meeting their soft cap, some project even complain of not making any sales.

The secret to the success of IEO is that the exchange itself artificially inflates the price of a new coin after the listing starts. This gives investors the opportunity to profit and the desire to participate in the next IEO on the same exchange.
Small exchanges do not have such a large amount of money for artificially inflating prices, so not all projects bring profit to their investors.

A basic principle is that investors will choose IEO on top exchanges, because these exchanges are almost certain that participants will be profitable if they can participate, while projects at smaller exchanges are more like gambling.
If smaller exchanges can improve liquidity and price after IEO, new traders will be attracted and The IEO game will welcome these exchanges.

it is true that the top exchangers have traders who are ready to collect coins from the IEO project carried out on the top exchangers. that is because they believe in the potential of the project. in addition, the exchanger team also helps to review a project whether it is feasible to trade on the exchanger or not. so, when it's feasible, of course traders will think that it's a worthy project.
 
but, it all depends on the quality of a project, sometimes there are some IEO that are also worth trading on exchangers that are not so popular.

yes you're right, because many people trust more with large exchanges. it's hard to convince investors if the IEO is in a small exchange. they think that projects that are in small exchanges will not succeed.

in fact the most important thing is not where IEO is located, but the quality of the project itself should be prioritized. projects that have good concepts and have a team that is focused on development will survive in the market. than projects that have a lot of speculation.

Most of the failed IEOs were not conducted with due diligence. Looking  at most of the successful IEOs in recent times, I think the top exchanges are really doing well with the IEOs as they are really careful with the number of IEOs they conduct. The smaller exchanges mostly conduct a number of IEOs at the same time and this goes a long way to affect sales.

Well big exchange and even the small ones are using ieo to hit customers with big hope of getting profit from the ieo with a quick return .

So the hope of returning and having a good project is lies on the capacity of the exchange and it makes the investors believe in investing on them which is more secure than ICO of then.

The main reason why IEOs were able to succeed ICOs was because it offers solution to the scam problems encountered in ICOs. And the fact that it started on the biggest exchange (Binance) in the crypto space is another major boast.
And the reason why IEO is bigger exchanges succeed better than smaller ones is because they have better volume and liquidity than them.

agree because based on what i see rarely ieo from small exchanges that can pump prices up to 2x or more small exchanges always fail, for example from idax, probit, pb2pb, shortex, vindax most of the list of exchanges like that do not succeed in raising but some projects exist that It might work because it was driven by the project community itself

Moreover,small exchanges rarely take time to review projects,find ones that are legit and predisposed to succeed,most of them are just lured with money and accept any project offering money.On the other hand,big exchanges are aware that failed IEOs stains their reputation therefore they cherry pick projects that are ought to succeed.

The game has a beginning and end, the Binance exchange started this race but the development is not going as planned. Small exchanges compete with the big exchanges and they try to show their strong sides in order to gain more liquidity by the IEO investors. The success rate depends on the raised funds on each token sale, the exchanges which have not been recognized by IEO whales are not going to replace the Binance Launchpad.
In my opinion, the liquidity issues are common for all exchanges, even Binance applied the BNB holders case in order to prevent the FUD. The ordinarily known case is not interesting for the big exchanges, only other exchanges look for the all possible selections for pulling more investors to their next IEO launch. Same impression is also substantive in the projects.

If a big exchanging is conducting IEO for the first time, there is higher chance that it will succeed, because they will do everything possible: talk of marketing, provision of enough liquidity and any other means, for it to succeed. Also, their first successfully held IEO, will have impact on the next one, which is which other subsequent IEOs feel the impact and more investors will be attracted. There is therefore no doubt that, IEO is mainly for the big exchanges.

Well, a very fun game. Global exchanges such as Binance, make IEO as one strategy to increase the price of their exchange coins from the terms and conditions for joining IEO. That's a good strategy, they get two benefits at once from the projects they support, and from their users. The risk of loss can be minimized if you join IEO on the big exchange because they will be more selective and not carelessly market IEO.

They are businessman they can do what they think it's good for there business. The real question is that method proper for everyone or not..? I can agree with your words big exchange are doing good than small exchange. And this success tricks or game i don't know that but i know some good quality project are coming because of them. Investor also show there interest now. So if we have to forward with positive side if there is negative side of IEO then we have to stand for that also.

If that's the case then traders simply speculate and manipulate prices for quick profits not because they see that IEOs have good projects and their coins or tokens are worth having.
So that it can be said that IEOs are only for the short term then investors should be careful about this because they will stuck in price speculation from whale.

Who would want to invest in an IEO project and choose bilaxy exchange over binance exchange?its only 1 out of 10 investors(crypto newbies) that invest on IEO projects from unpopular exchanges,for example bigger exchanges care more about REPUTATION and POST in crypto space,with these many new investors will have to stick with these exchanges for business assurances like IEOs to get the best result you cant get anywhere else.

Yes ,, indeed that is the real reason, why investors are more interested in investing in IEO, rather than in ICO, because investors are trying to find ways of investing that really do make them earn profits by following on the famous exchange.

Investors will definitely choose an exchanger with a good reputation. The problem faced by many investors when they want to join IEO in exchangers such as Binance is the difficulty of getting tickets to participate and for small investors who are difficult to participate, they prefer to speculate by following the IEO organized by small exchangers.

That's the truth in this early stage, but I believe small exchange will be able to use their platform successfully for IEO when the market will grow.
Since there are only limited number of IEO compared to ICO, of course it's expected that the big exchange will dominate because investors will choose bigger exchanges over the smaller once due to the fact that they have big reputation to loss in case they offer a scam projects in IEO.

IEO is only for large exchanges. small exchanges will never be successful in organizing IEO. there are many projects that do IEO in small exchanges, and in the end they can only get softcaps. it's hard for them to reach hardcap, but it's different if IEO starts in exchanges like Binance and others.

Yes, of course. Big exchange have advantage from IEO, they know their capacity to make people get in there. It will be the way for exchange to get more profit after fees of transaction. But, we must be aware to buy new token from IEO, they still can turn into  scam project even they paid big exchange to listed.

Nobody would want to invest in IEO in smaller exchanges if given the opportunity to do so in bigger exchanges. For instance, many struggle to participate in Binance launchpad, but yet not all will buy in. Another point is that some smaller exchanges lack reputation aside liquidity, so investors are really skeptical nowadays.

There's no doubt that the best IEOs were held by the top exchange and several was completed in less than a day. The fact still remains that most failed IEO was as a result of the exchange who lacked high net worth traders. Most of these exchanges are the medium and low class exchange.

It is. Big exchange is a warranty of a big interest. But also they have to care about the quality of the project, they do not need to list everything, they have enough money, but they need to have satisfied customers that will come back and buy again next IEO tokens.

I agree, most IEOs on major exchanges like Binance and Huobi are successful. Few IEO projects on major exchanges have failed. This is in stark contrast to IEO on small exchanges. By and leading exchanges have great reputation and capital to pump for IEO projects.

Traders generally believe that because a large exchange is conducting the IEO that as such the project will be successful and bring good profit, which is a general sentiment and from the bandwagon, this has been coming true because the public flows to where many traders are. Smaller exchanges tend to list just anything and have little financial power as compared to larger exchanges. Although there could be fake volume and bots in some large exchange.

Small exchanges has found a way to do marketing for traders and that is to conduct IEO to new projects. Its hitting two birds in one stone for them, the small exchanges earns the trust of IEO investors, they gradually become popular and also found some partners in the guise of these project developers. Not bad if the teams are actually legit but we'll find out later.

The same reason why we should be worried about exchange platform like Latoken that boast of having high daily trading volume and ranked 19 currently on coinmarketcap have IEOs that non has been successful. The fact still remains that most top exchange that has high Success rate of IEO listed project that is of high quality and has great prospects that are also backed up by dev members that are not faking image document or identity. There are some project that I see every day that even I know that they are scam

Not really. Recently there was IOU for Perlin IEO at Binance. Its been at Utorg.io exchange, a brand new one.

Top exchange like Binance do have the advantage as investors keep trying to have the chance to work and invest with new IEO projects that's been offered from this exchange, small exchange getting some piece of investors who are willing to take the risk those who are trying to find gems inside the market and targeting project that's been offered around small exchange and crosses their fingers to see whether they have a good outcome or not.

100% true, the better the exchange the more investors it can attract.,
But dont forget to read the project and its mission.
Its future  plan and development. they might be in good exchange to gather monet but are they worth for a long run?

Hard work pays out, those bigger exchanges worked for it and if smaller exchanges wants to get to that stage, then they should work hard to create the hype that most of these exchanges has and has been using to make any of their project a successful one.

You are really not far from truth to say that the reason why IEO is successful on bigger exchanges is because most of them already have the volume that they will push to such exchange and because of their reputation, people tend to believe in them, but aside hype also, they still do their own due diligent to ensure that they continue to maintain their reputation by not allowing any project without real use case to be registered on their platform. This is one reason why they become successful.

YES! IEO is a game and another money for top exchanges.
A project always want a better exchange, investors will come if they are into one of the best exchange.
Though, just remember, those top exchanges now are came from unknown before and they were just small at the start.

That is a symbiosis of mutualism. A global exchange which has high popularity increases the chance of the project becoming wider in shaping the ecosystem. Exchange can make terms and conditions that benefit them as rules in joining IEO. Whatever it is, the important thing is to provide profits to investors, why not? the important thing is still to use a safe way and adjust to your ability.

I agree that this is a mutually beneficial collaboration between the project and the exchanger. Like Binance for example, IEO participants must use BNB Coins so that the price of BNB Coins and BNB Coin market cap values increase and the project gets funds quickly without having to do marketing that requires a large fee

The success rate of IEO can indeed be seen by the Exchange chosen for IEO. I once followed IEO pasa one of the local Exchange which was not so popular, sales were successful and finished in a few hours. However, because the Exchange is still quite new, the Project has no signs of going up and is still 10x below the IEO price.
another thing if IEO is held in Exchange like Binance, because Binace is currently the best Exchange for now.

I am agree with this thought because only big exchange like Binance or Huobi gives a real good profit from IEO. But need to say that also good profit can not from such a big exchanges.

IEO is a game for all type of exchange both top or bottom and like league battles the top exchanges tends to do better but on some occasions some low exchanges can rub a successful initial exchange offering

If you think IEO is a game, who will lose? and who will win? Exchange really risked its big name when it decided to make an IEO.

I don’t like how IEO has been developing recently. Most projects have lost a lot of price in recent years. If the market does not turn around, it will be a failure for the entire IEO market.

That is the power of popularity and market networks. Global exchanges such as Binance have good turnover and volume, many investors put funds there, so if there are projects that work with Binance it is definitely not an arbitrary project, there is an "expensive price" behind it. While IEO in the market is small, the chances of success are also getting smaller, returning to market confidence.

Binance came up with this IEO idea in other to promote their chain system, but despite that, I still don’t see much activities around it, there is very few IEO projects that is being released by them and that is not enough to really drive their value high compared to the number of project that goes through Ethereum chain, so no matter how much binance wants to compete with Ethereum, ICO projects are still quite more than IEO and I have not really felt any game change from IEO.

IEO has not really succeeded in creating hype for the crowdfunding space unlike ICO did in the year 2017, so to me, Exchanges are just the ones benefiting from these scheme more and which has given chance to some of these non-serious exchanges too  to make money without delivering anything quality.

IEO is not just a game for large exchanges. but IEO can be used to be a tool to expand and enlarge the merchant community in an exchange. but it all depends on how the new project brings in investors from outside who not only come from the exchange. there are even a number of small exchanges that also hold IEO and remain successful even though their achievements are not as big as those with large trade.

IEOs are doing great only on big exchanges. If you take Latoken as an example, they did IEOs even during early 2018 and nobody cared. As soon as Binance started to do IEOs, everybody gone crazy and every IEO was sold out within seconds.

Yes, because there are certain conditions on large exchanges, I read that projects that conduct ieo pay a lot of money to the exchange to conduct ieo, and they also need to ensure the volume of trading on the exchange, and leave a deposit if these conditions are not met then The project is excluded from the listing of the exchange. Small projects cannot afford this, therefore they are carried out on poor exchanges, and this I think is not fair.

The point about liquidity is right. IEO is now a huge thing; many big investors are leaning towards it now. 2019 has been a very successful year for IEO and a deeming one for ICO considering the fact that many investors now rely on IEO and look for ways to invest in it. The liquidity naturally flows to these top exchanges.

Absolutely, you hit the it. Small exchanges conducting an IEO doesn't have investors to buy their token that's why most projects conducted on small exchanges are not sold-out and when the listing starts it usually dumps under IEO price. However, if you conduct an IEO on top class exchange it usually sold-out because they have so many investors thinking that they will profit which usually gain profits.

You righ, and another thing is only good project will launch their IEO on big exchange. Not all project will launch the IEO on big exchange with many reason.

to get a good market, everything needs a good project, and also interesting. some IEO projects might be judged by the market where they will sell, it's just that it's not easy to enter a market that has good popularity, therefore, the project also needs to have a perfect concept.

so I feel that some projects can be assessed through which projects will be marketed.

That is why they are top exchanges, they have the influence needed to bring about liquidity to a project. It is without doubt that that is what a product running Ieo is running for. Without trade force and recognition, there is nothing even the best of projects can do. About smaller exchanges, its sad but they do not possess what it takes for projects to excel there.

It has been a very great year for big exchanges because they are the ones that really know  how to manage the IEO, and I would not say that the IEO is a complete success because the hype IEO got when they came to the market was high and I thought that by now, it would have created the same impact that ICO created in year 2017 that made us have bull run for that year but till now, I have not really seen anything that would make people say that it was because of IEO that the bull run started.

so if you may please tell me what the effect of the IEO has been, this is why I said it has been a big year for exchanges because they are making their cool money by collecting their listing fee and people like binance using it to boost their own cryptocurrency that has been created.

If you have a good project and a nice team and also want to have the sure success then you should play for the IEO in one of the biggest exchange.
This IEO is a game-changer and will get more investors that the old ICO before.
IEO is not a game for tp exchanges! this is a profit for them to play.

In my opinion, it is rating exchanges that guarantee that IEO companies will have good prospects and that is why investors and other participants in the process participate in the development of such a project.  Based on this, I believe that it is right if IEO belong only to the most rated exchanges.

Yeah you right, IEO only work with an exchange who already have a "Brand", "Name", "Nice Rank" & "Good Reputation". Other exchange IEO was really shit, to be honest IEO only work for 1-3 top exchange by coin markets like Huobi or Binance. They already have a brand name, because of that the project who launch on their platform get a good benefit from the exchange platform. Just call it "FREE Advertiser" from the exchange Name/Brand.

Out of all the IEOs conducted, only certain popular and top exchanges have made it interesting. If a project that is not especially IEO based succeeds, it tends to attract investors, because there is every likelihood that more of it will succeeds this is a typical example of what we see happened on big exchanges such as, Binance, Kucoin, Gate, Bitmax and the likes.

it has become a common thing. Every Top exchange that holds an IEO has terms and conditions that indeed benefit them as well as platform providers. The price they offer is also quite expensive, but with the presentation of IEO's great success. Investors will glance at every coin that is registered. This will benefit both parties.

That's the idea; any IEO taking place on smaller exchanges, the success rate is always slim while those of top exchanges is always rewarding. IEO taking place in top exchanges is always a three way thing; that is, it benefits the team, exchange as well as the investors. The team or rather a good team who knows what they want will always go for top exchanges, the exchange on the other hand most times select only top projects which they know will attract investors while making them more popular in the world of IEOs. In addition, investors also needs profit and as such will always participate in IEOs carryout on top exchanges because profit and peace of mind is sure.

yeah what you said is true, IEOs are now a business for every big exchange and as you said IEO on the big exchange will be more successful than a small exchange.
I've never even heard of IEOs that succeed on a small exchange.

yep you can't ignore that factor, the big name of exchange really work here, my mean they have trust from their users , and they have profesional management to manage IEO that hosting on their exchange. No wonder why many investor ignoring small exchange whenever they host some IEO

Its looks like try, but don't forget about SERO with IEO on gate io, which makes up to 50x. But I don't think that gate io is one of the large exchange. So I think not all that simple, there many variables not just top exchange/

That is the truth in IEOs and it is only a win-win situation for top exchanges like Binance and Huobi. The first advantage is they get to ask for a huge fee first to projects to launch their IEO and second is the fees they get from people buying their tokens and because it is a lottery sysem then just imagine a million of users trying to get in.

It's not all about being a top exchange that makes an IEO successful or not, frequency is an important factor... Top exchanges only launch one IEO at a time, driving there whole trading community towards that raise. Other exchanges launch 5 IEOs at a time, like LAToken, making it hard to reach the cap for each simultaneously  ??? Check out the calendar on https://ieoalarm.com (https://ieoalarm.com), exmarkets, latoken...all of simultaneously running IEOs

In fact, you should not particularly trust the IEO at these exchanges . Of course, they are now the most popular in this segment of the market, but if you look at those projects that they run on their platform, they do not always inspire confidence. And as a result, we see the initial pump, and further gradual rolling prices in down. Because these projects do not have real value (as a product).

If i wanna go to invest i will choose big exchange, i meet before some issue with small exchanges, especially in liquidity.
Binance is very good, it is my exchanges.

To be honest, most of those who participate in IEO on large exchanges go for it only for profit. After listing, they merge their tokens / coins and move on (to a new project). So what kind of development of the blockchain industry can we talk about? I am sorry that those projects that could solve global problems in the future unfortunately will not see the light because of the "consumer society"

The advantage of large exchangers is the large volume of daily transactions they have. This is different from small exchangers whose transaction volume is different from large exchangers and maybe this is what makes IEO from large exchangers always sold out in just minutes and makes the price of tokens go up high after the initial listing

IEO already change the cwordfunding system on crypto industry
and not only a big exchange, but small exchange get the benefits from the hype on IEO
but, in my opinion an IEO will success or not is depends on the project itself, not depends on the exchange mate
regards

Hosting an IEO on an exchange that is not popular is more worse than listing on the exchange ! No one will even buy it . That’s why almost all project that do IEO on small exchanges usually return almost dead ! Big exchanges have all the advantages that’s why it’s good for them and for the project

Honestly, I do not know projects that did IEO on exchanges like Probit and made profit. They may have collected some funds, if it was not manipulated, but the chance of success of such an IEO is around 0,1 percent.

IEO is a real game changer for many big exchanges this year and its advisable for new projects to always find their way to top exchanges for their fundraising activities,doing so will give them better results in volume and liquidity and many more investors will have no choice but to invest as far as the project has a real working product backing it up

It is obvious that not reputable exchanges will not have success in token sales. You buy token on Binance because you believe Binance that they have chosen it properly. If this token becomes scam, you will change your mind about Binance.  ;)

The thing is that such exchanges have too little reputation. I see that simply on the same Binance name without products, projects receive huge investments. And I'm scared to think what would happen if a fraudster holds an IEO there.  I do not think that such an investment scheme will work too long.

No just the liquidity, they have the users who are ready to take part in the IEO and keep the pump alive. I think IEOs only survived on Binance, Bittrex IEOs weren't successful their first ever IEO traded on a loss first day of trade.

This is because IEO is a new form of investment this year after the ICO craze,
however, after this year only those who are listed on big exchanges will truly
prosper. the other project who list their coins on some small exchange 
will be forgotten if don't make a move to list it in even more  big exchanges.

 

You are correct in all ramifications, large user base is key in any exchange thus giving any exchange with huge community advantage over others. How this works is that, these exchanges through their community will create the neccessary hype which will attract more users thus leading to higher participation, while smaller exchanges on the other hand struggles with IEO, even if they are successful, there won't be huge ROI as compared to top exchanges. However, the negative impact of this is, investors are now after hype and profit thus caring less of what the project offers.

You are wrong with that, there are a lot of exchanges that offers IEO, and if we talk about survival, you cannot make a judgment looking its performance only in the early stage. Binance can hype IEO, that's why they are popular, given they have the volume but it's not the only reason for project to survive, the main reason is if they will be able to develop the project while they are in a good exchanges, and I'm sure investors are looking on the progress of each project listed in Binance and they might loss volume if they will not continue to stay competitive.

There has been a lot of big exchanges that did this as well. As long as you pay the exchanges the amount required then you do not have anything to worry about.

Just to give an example a close friend of mine has a coin of his own and he literally talked with each company by flying to those places, not just talk them on discord or telegram or something, he literally flew to their headquarters and had meetings and talked what could be done, even after he being at that level he realized it is just empty volume that doesn't make sense, binance literally requested 50 bitcoins so he could be listed on dex, nothing else, they didn't even checked the coin, just give 50 btc and you are listed. So, ask yourself if exchanges do not care anything but their profits, would IEO really make anyone else any profits?

as more on use with customs on ideal science as possession on entrance with investors preference on referring use of option with chance as examining use of notice with records and information on moderation, the decision to work on entrance with field of exchange on market forum to deliver as fine to match of numbers of future target to complete as the terms of investment.

During the ICOs, it was the altcoin and token creators who benefited the most. Many of them became millionaires overnight. With the IEOs, both the exchange owners and the project promoters are benefiting. Big exchanges such as Huobi and Binance are making tens of millions of USD every month from the IEO listing. Even the mid-tier exchanges such as Coineal are amassing amounts well in excess of hundreds of thousands of USD per month.

that's the trend that is now happening in the IEO investment market. we can see many exchanges that do IEO, but not all can collect as much money from what has already been exchanged as you mentioned.
but this is not a game, it is a system that is supported and practiced by many investors. but I don't think IEO is too good, because it is still dominated by large exchanges.

Yes, you are right. IEO in big exchanges have an excellent opportunity to be successful, but not all projects in top exchanges have a chance to be successful. I always check the project carefully because if a project is in the top exchange it doesn’t guarantee its success and same is vice versa.

Investors don't really look at the project's success through adoption or partnership but the truth is that they look at its roi to consider it is successful. There are very good projects that gets listed on Kucoin, bitmax and gate but now they are failing because they hype on it died and it don't get pumped anymore. But it's true that IEO is a game for top exchanges because they still get huge gains even just for the 'initial fee' of the projects who wants to get launch on their platform.

That is true, these top exchanges collaborating themselves with the projects and listing some new tokens heavy price which is not at all worth to invest. I never wish to invest on IEO for long term purposes, Instead we can choose good ICO to invest the fund at safe side. We need to check the project team and what is the project is about to confirm whether you can invest or not!

Also exchanges do get lot of benefits from IEO. Take the example of Binance. They allowed only BNB coin to participate in the IEO and thus the price and demand of the Binance coin increased a lot. Same is the case with KCS (Kucoin exchange) and others.
But at the same time, it is also beneifial for the investors because they know that the coin will be listed on the exchange and they will gain good profit from it.

This is where the game starts where these clever exchangers do make use of their own exchange token rather than directly participates on using up bitcoin.
We do see exchange tokens really rise up on demand due to IEO hype but now we are gradually seeing that they hype is starting to decline (based on my observation).
There are still IEO's which arent profitable into its investors but most likely they do able to gain after its being traded specially on top tier exchangers thats why lots of people
are really longing for them to get listed or able to join up the sale.

Lets give it a rest but IEO are nothing but ICOs in another new name. It is the same shitcoin being promoted in the same shitty marketing method just the place of distribution is different and the listing is easier since the exchange is giving them out. But do not take the credibility of the exchange for the future of that IEO token. They are least bothered about the project and their own concern is the money they get for listing and distributing the token.

People need to look through the smoke and mirros or these scam offerings and stop promoting them.

The team or project has paid a lot of money to get listed in top exchanges. It has an excellent chance of gaining investors. But it does not guarantee their success as you still have to be careful with your investment.

looking at the IEO industries and the exchangers that currently are into the business, we can conclude that the exchangers that have much liquidity can also give, to an extent, some degree of influence in projects that they host their IEO thorugh their platforms

True you said that the most frequently successful IEOs are exchanges with good market backgrounds and these good exchanges are Binance, Kucoin, Bittrex, Okex, and Bitforex and some of them are not which is good for me because often the price of the token does not improve as it enters the platform exchange.

Reputation is always been tied up of exchange success on any field or new methods that being used on.Remember those ICO days where the primary target of project owners is to get listed on top exchange since they do know that it can boost up its prices and same goes with IEO thing where people will normally choose up those who are on the top
because they know that lots will be longing or to look after with those projects which they already presumed that it will really make up some decent profits
since volume or majority is trading up with those exchangers so its just normal to see on where would people go.

Say a shady exchange pulls up a shady IEO. How does that sound? Shady?

To you maybe. But not to the hordes of shitposting people of this forum who will continues to promote it and then complain of not getting paid. Even though big exchanges take up IEOs after doing some screening about the project, its owners and the product, I doubt how much it actually goes through and how much is just paid bullshit.

One thing is for sure, exchanges come here for money. They prey on every ICO/IEO to make them rich and more rich. Dont believe me? Just look at how high Binance listing fee was.

although it does not guarantee the success of a project, a top exchanger can be one of the supports and partnerships that can make investors interested in investing. for example, if there are 2 IEO, 1 does IEO on popular markets, and one does IEO on less well-known markets. People will be more interested in IEO in the popular market. it can be one of the weapons to make investors see what projects you are making. a good team will definitely be confident about the project, so they target IEO in the popular market.

Yes, you are right the successful IEO's are from the potential exchanges like Binance, Kucoin, Bittrex, Okex etc. Of course, IEO's already listed on those exchange cannot able to increase their value but only from the Binance those coins has given very good profit to the investors.

Let us not presume that any IEO that comes from Binance will always give profit to investors in short term as it's not true.
Some people doesn't know the real IEO success rate of Binance when they see one project successful they tend to think that all the projects will be a success and that's why the hype starts.

Common mistake on most people where they do generalize all things on just basing on a single project that had shoot up its price and succeed.
Hype does really built up on that one and neglecting or doesnt focused out on other projects that doesnt give out benefits into its investors.
People are way too direct when making up conclusions and when the hype is already built then it do give out that domino effect until the entire
community will able to believe that ieo investments are 100% profitable which isnt really what it is.

which is not true sucess of the project will not be base which exchange that project listed . the project will be successful if tthey continue to make solution and develop thier project to the real goal of it .

Exactly, but what people's definition about success are short term success, that's why they are so hype when it comes to Binance IEO since its proven it they could sell more than 100% of the original price. If we are talking about long term then project that's listed in big exchange like Binance always has a chance to grow more as long as they will work to improve since they already have the liquidity, they just need to convince people that their project has a great future potential.

Correct since binance is pretty solid foundation and many people will look at those token as good one since for sure binance will not let those scam coins be listed on there launchpads. And if we look on the past IEO of them then we can see that the tokens/coins is doing great with have a good volume for listing there so that's why I participated on them on harmony and perlin yet I'm earning good with those andwill look more on there future IEO.

This is true happened, even IEO arise at this season since that most of the exchange under IEO are just small and not popular yet, like Ozinex, Vindax, Exmarket, and more it doesn't mean the token project will succeed, of course not! but it is still depend on the updates of the project even it is ICO.

This statement is very accurate. The key to the success of the IEO project is the number of users. If there are many people, there will be more investors and the success rate will be greater.

It is undeniable that IEO's on large exchanges is more desirable and trusted than on small exchanges.  I followed IEO on Binance and followed IEO on P2PB2B, I compared that coins/tokens of IEO on Binance were able to last longer (prices did not immediately fall "Dump").  IEO's on a small exchange on average very quickly becomes worthless than IEO's on a large exchange.

It will give potential investors, even exchange have more users theres no way more of them will invest unless it will give guarantees profit , and we all know that investing is risky and no words as guaranteed when investing in any crowdfunding.

Accepted but, at the same time Binance IEO may be a good option for those who are looking for quick flip and thus they put in a 100$ in some new shitcoin with a lot of vaporware and a bunch of braindead shills. They can execute the trade of 120$ even when the shills are fighting among themselves and thus get a quick 20$ profit out of it.

Now imagine the condition if they are doing this everyday with not just one but several IEOs. They are like venture capitals taking their profit and leaving. They are not bagholders. They are the reason why exchanges see a lot of activity besides the bots.

They need to be engaged in the project market making and that is why big exchanges have the upper hand.