IEOs is a game for top exchanges.

[SirLancelot]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

Hard work pays out, those bigger exchanges worked for it and if smaller exchanges wants to get to that stage, then they should work hard to create the hype that most of these exchanges has and has been using to make any of their project a successful one.

You are really not far from truth to say that the reason why IEO is successful on bigger exchanges is because most of them already have the volume that they will push to such exchange and because of their reputation, people tend to believe in them, but aside hype also, they still do their own due diligent to ensure that they continue to maintain their reputation by not allowing any project without real use case to be registered on their platform. This is one reason why they become successful.

[anjho.ace]

YES! IEO is a game and another money for top exchanges.
A project always want a better exchange, investors will come if they are into one of the best exchange.
Though, just remember, those top exchanges now are came from unknown before and they were just small at the start.

[tanjiran]

That is a symbiosis of mutualism. A global exchange which has high popularity increases the chance of the project becoming wider in shaping the ecosystem. Exchange can make terms and conditions that benefit them as rules in joining IEO. Whatever it is, the important thing is to provide profits to investors, why not? the important thing is still to use a safe way and adjust to your ability.

[andika2018]

That is a symbiosis of mutualism. A global exchange which has high popularity increases the chance of the project becoming wider in shaping the ecosystem. Exchange can make terms and conditions that benefit them as rules in joining IEO. Whatever it is, the important thing is to provide profits to investors, why not? the important thing is still to use a safe way and adjust to your ability.

I agree that this is a mutually beneficial collaboration between the project and the exchanger. Like Binance for example, IEO participants must use BNB Coins so that the price of BNB Coins and BNB Coin market cap values increase and the project gets funds quickly without having to do marketing that requires a large fee

[taufik123]

Well, you've said it correctly.Most investors would rely to a reliable exchange and has high liquidity because they've learned a lot from the past year with ICO's. It's basically the new trend but still there has some precautions that has to be measured before investing.
These popular exchanges are doing it and investors are also meticulous in picking the IEO that they would invest, if I'm into IEO's why would even I'll invest to the project that's held on a not so popular exchange? I'm aware that success rate is lower.

The success rate of IEO can indeed be seen by the Exchange chosen for IEO. I once followed IEO pasa one of the local Exchange which was not so popular, sales were successful and finished in a few hours. However, because the Exchange is still quite new, the Project has no signs of going up and is still 10x below the IEO price.
another thing if IEO is held in Exchange like Binance, because Binace is currently the best Exchange for now.

[alt-fire]

I am agree with this thought because only big exchange like Binance or Huobi gives a real good profit from IEO. But need to say that also good profit can not from such a big exchanges.

[Upgate]

IEO is a game for all type of exchange both top or bottom and like league battles the top exchanges tends to do better but on some occasions some low exchanges can rub a successful initial exchange offering

[inoes]

If you think IEO is a game, who will lose? and who will win? Exchange really risked its big name when it decided to make an IEO.

[Rooivalk]

I don’t like how IEO has been developing recently. Most projects have lost a lot of price in recent years. If the market does not turn around, it will be a failure for the entire IEO market.

[xiboothrezi]

That is the power of popularity and market networks. Global exchanges such as Binance have good turnover and volume, many investors put funds there, so if there are projects that work with Binance it is definitely not an arbitrary project, there is an "expensive price" behind it. While IEO in the market is small, the chances of success are also getting smaller, returning to market confidence.

[SquallLeonhart]

That is a symbiosis of mutualism. A global exchange which has high popularity increases the chance of the project becoming wider in shaping the ecosystem. Exchange can make terms and conditions that benefit them as rules in joining IEO. Whatever it is, the important thing is to provide profits to investors, why not? the important thing is still to use a safe way and adjust to your ability.

I agree that this is a mutually beneficial collaboration between the project and the exchanger. Like Binance for example, IEO participants must use BNB Coins so that the price of BNB Coins and BNB Coin market cap values increase and the project gets funds quickly without having to do marketing that requires a large fee

Binance came up with this IEO idea in other to promote their chain system, but despite that, I still don’t see much activities around it, there is very few IEO projects that is being released by them and that is not enough to really drive their value high compared to the number of project that goes through Ethereum chain, so no matter how much binance wants to compete with Ethereum, ICO projects are still quite more than IEO and I have not really felt any game change from IEO.

IEO has not really succeeded in creating hype for the crowdfunding space unlike ICO did in the year 2017, so to me, Exchanges are just the ones benefiting from these scheme more and which has given chance to some of these non-serious exchanges too  to make money without delivering anything quality.

[cunguks]

IEO is not just a game for large exchanges. but IEO can be used to be a tool to expand and enlarge the merchant community in an exchange. but it all depends on how the new project brings in investors from outside who not only come from the exchange. there are even a number of small exchanges that also hold IEO and remain successful even though their achievements are not as big as those with large trade.

[r_delossa]

IEOs are doing great only on big exchanges. If you take Latoken as an example, they did IEOs even during early 2018 and nobody cared. As soon as Binance started to do IEOs, everybody gone crazy and every IEO was sold out within seconds.

[poketis22]

Yes, because there are certain conditions on large exchanges, I read that projects that conduct ieo pay a lot of money to the exchange to conduct ieo, and they also need to ensure the volume of trading on the exchange, and leave a deposit if these conditions are not met then The project is excluded from the listing of the exchange. Small projects cannot afford this, therefore they are carried out on poor exchanges, and this I think is not fair.

[NoirSuccubus]

The point about liquidity is right. IEO is now a huge thing; many big investors are leaning towards it now. 2019 has been a very successful year for IEO and a deeming one for ICO considering the fact that many investors now rely on IEO and look for ways to invest in it. The liquidity naturally flows to these top exchanges.

[mcnocon2]

Absolutely, you hit the it. Small exchanges conducting an IEO doesn't have investors to buy their token that's why most projects conducted on small exchanges are not sold-out and when the listing starts it usually dumps under IEO price. However, if you conduct an IEO on top class exchange it usually sold-out because they have so many investors thinking that they will profit which usually gain profits.

[herfianto]

You righ, and another thing is only good project will launch their IEO on big exchange. Not all project will launch the IEO on big exchange with many reason.

[Dr.Osh]

Correct. That's why IEO is the best upgrade to ICO. Compared to ICO where you'll have to wait months before getting into an exchange, IEO will to that for you in no time and you'll also get a nice volume for it. Most IEO will succeed because of the system behind it.

Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.

to get a good market, everything needs a good project, and also interesting. some IEO projects might be judged by the market where they will sell, it's just that it's not easy to enter a market that has good popularity, therefore, the project also needs to have a perfect concept.

so I feel that some projects can be assessed through which projects will be marketed.

[Iykejunior]

That is why they are top exchanges, they have the influence needed to bring about liquidity to a project. It is without doubt that that is what a product running Ieo is running for. Without trade force and recognition, there is nothing even the best of projects can do. About smaller exchanges, its sad but they do not possess what it takes for projects to excel there.

[jostorres]

The point about liquidity is right. IEO is now a huge thing; many big investors are leaning towards it now. 2019 has been a very successful year for IEO and a deeming one for ICO considering the fact that many investors now rely on IEO and look for ways to invest in it. The liquidity naturally flows to these top exchanges.

It has been a very great year for big exchanges because they are the ones that really know  how to manage the IEO, and I would not say that the IEO is a complete success because the hype IEO got when they came to the market was high and I thought that by now, it would have created the same impact that ICO created in year 2017 that made us have bull run for that year but till now, I have not really seen anything that would make people say that it was because of IEO that the bull run started.

so if you may please tell me what the effect of the IEO has been, this is why I said it has been a big year for exchanges because they are making their cool money by collecting their listing fee and people like binance using it to boost their own cryptocurrency that has been created.