Bitcoin Forum

Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?

What kind of stupid question is this? Obviously nobody wants to perform, or participate in an IEO that will fail, regardless which exchange it is on. Obviously  they would rather participate in an IEO that has at least some chance of success, even if it is on a complete trash exchange.

Way to make your question heavily biased.

don't be smartass ok,
I'm just asking, pay close attention to my question ?
no one said that IEO was a failure, I just said IEO was flat, did something flat is fail ?

Obviously a project that will succeed will do so because it has what it takes so it can also do well in any exchange whether shit or not. I think the project matters a lot and that is important first before exchange.

So do you think the credibility of an exchange is not really important?

I think people in crypto are very paranoid about credibility and reputation, so I must say that they will ignore a project that will be launch on a shitty exchanges.

I think credibility or reputation is very important that's why projects being launch in top tier exchanges received so much money during their IEO launch. You just have to look at Binance launchpad, how many projects launch under them and how much money was raised so far?

I'm sure it didn't happen according to the facts. IEOs on top exchanges must attract more people than IEOs on shit exchanges. For example : IEOs on Binance and IEOs on Yobit, then surely you must find out the more enthusiastic on Binance than Yobit. Anyway, can you give me examples of IEOs that have flat public responses on top exchanges? I'm quite curious about that..

Yes it's really important and why not? have you take a look at cryptorank and see the performance that has been made by the major exchange site. The majority of them never make the investors feeling disappointed. Remember the enthusiastic can be faked. You don't know what will be the result of that IEO.
For me big exchange has big volume and even if IEO gets a little demand but it still has a lot of chance to be traded with high volume after that.

Both are pretty crappy and I'd likely avoid investing in either option, though I'd rather invest in an IEO that has any sort of chance of being successful even if it's launching on a crappy exchange that's loaded with issues or has poor/slow support. On the other hand, there's also plenty of bad or unoriginal IEOs that launch on good exchanges that don't ever make it anywhere for various reasons such as just simply having a bad product. I suppose I'd rather invest in the better IEO in the end.

An active community does not connote a successful project or that it does not make the project successful. However, it is very much needed. If it is done on a big or healthy exchange, the exchange already has its community. Which means that it will add to the already existing number.
No matter how huge and supportive community is, lunching an IEO of good exchange is very essential.

I would prefer the public response is flat but we have seen that most of the IEOS that were done on top exchanges were of a success. Even the project is sort of unfamiliar, crappy and unpopular as long as it's held on a popular exchange, they get a successful sale. The next choice is what happens today, there were exchanges that are not popular too and the public becomes too optimistic about it because we have not seen the finished product until everything changes after the sale.

I did not choose both, because I prefer big exchanges that have high HYPE, or maybe big exchangers and the project is very active and also has high enthusiasm,
I use money, so I am very careful when taking IEO.

I personally prefer an IEO running on a large exchange that has a high volume because there are many wealthy traders who are likely to invest in this promising project. In my opinion, the public response does not matter at the first stage while the team raises funds to develop their product or service. Perhaps the community will see the benefits from using purchased coins or tokens in the future. I think that IEO which was run on a credible cryptocurrency exchange looks more respectable.

Of course everyone will love IEO in large exchanges because they are sure the public will know which projects are good so enter the big market IEO, but if IEO in small exchanges people will be silent and participate in promoting it.

The Exchange has successful IEO they will choose the project very carefully. So, I think you only need to search on google for a minute and you will find the IEO statistics on the exchanges. With the data, I think it is not difficult to choose to join IEO on any exchange.

People currently only care about IEO at large exchanges, so if IEO is implemented at shitexchange then that IEO will fail, just like ICO

I think the IEO project will be more organized than the ICO, how not every investor at least has the peace of money they spend. But I see that IEO has an exchange (responsible) where at least the money spent by each investor can be managed or stored properly. I have a belief in exchanges, especially exchanges that already have credibility in cryptocurrency, they will always prioritize a reputation which will not be hasty when taking a project. As has been done by Bittrex recently.

The top exchange IEO projects are good. They have a huge potential to get quick profit with it. But we hard to participate top exchange IEOs right now. Because of lotteries. The loattaries need to hodl their exchange coins to participate in IEOs. That's why. I personally don't like to recommend exchanges with low volumes. The exchange is not the only thing to participate in IEOs. If you are going to invest long term, you have to check about future updates, development team, marketing and many more.

I have never invested in IEO or some kind of IEO listed on a large exchange, but I see many people who get short profits if investing in large IEO (Binance) if I'm not mistaken like the Harmony project they get a good ATH.

I think you should compose a much better question such as if youre gonna pick an IEO exchange for somw project is it worth to buy on major one such as Binance or a mid range one such as exmarkets? To be honest the question is kinda confusing. Sometime topic like this is common sense and more of newbie question type.

I prefer to do IEO on the top exchange than the exchange, which is not credible. I am sure the response from the trader will be good for the new token that will be listed on those exchanges. You can have a big chance to see the token will reach its success in that exchange because the top exchange will have huge traders that will have interest with your project.

I don't think that in the exchange which is not credible will have a public who are enthusiastic because all in all, the exchange still not credible and we cannot expecting to reach goals in that exchange. I think you need to ask in the top exchange about how much they use the fee to do IEO in their site so you can calculate how much money you will need to spend.

Make sure you follow the rule on the top exchange because in every exchange will have a different rule.

Who wants to participate on shit exchanges and there's no certainty that users funds are safe and that the IEO will be successful? I better go on big, well known and trusted exchanges like Binance because it's all about short term profit.

I would choose an IEO that will have a fair chance of giving us a good return, in this case, I am going to go with the less known exchange.

Yes, you are right, choosing an IEO in exchange like Binance is always the right choice but sometimes it is impossible to get the tokens because there is huge competition in Binance exchange. I will not choose the Exmarket IEO's because after concluding the IEO, sometimes the coins are not listed in EXmarket exchanges.

An IEO remains to be all about the project and the exchange is just adding more credibility to the project and that opportunity that the project is exposed to a wider audience (the audience captured already by the exchange). No matter how good is the exchange if the project is not then there is nothing the exchange can do except maybe to reject the project in the first place as there is also a strict vetting process that good exchanges are implementing. Yes, it is also possible that a good project can be doing well even in a not-so-good exchange and this is what I would prefer. Still, we have to understand that good projects are always looking at the top exchanges for more chances of success, of course.

The project is what matters the most, especially at present in which it is so hard to find decent projects...
of course that a good exchange will bring credibility and hype... and of course the potential of a high number of users participating.... but in the end it is just that... any exchange will do if the project is really good, just the probability of good results is higher on a good exchange...

a shit coin will always be a shit coin or token even if it was launch on big exchange , and vice verser to the low exchange as well but marketing and team in most cases could drive a project high for more customer or investors but folloing the lay dwn rules and road map is another thing that require from the team and if that fail in between then the project ends there .

There is no way to know if any project will succeed or not even if you do your part by doing research very well, it will always be a risk whenever you invest in IEO or any crypto investments because you don't know what will come after, its really a big problem for many projects are just scam projects

Of course we will go in an IEO projects that will be launched by reputable, established and popular crypto exchanges that will offer a high possibilty of launching a successful coin. And I am sorry to tell you OP that most of the investors are very enthusiastic with the popular exchanges than the new ones with lesser reputations.

Your questions are impossible to happen. I mean, most enthusiasts will not take a risk in a shit exchanges that is not trustworthy.

I think choosing an exchange will have a huge effect on the project, lots of good projects have failed because they are minimizing their budgets in choosing an exchange. If the project choose "trash exchange" investors will have a doubt.

Having IEO on top exchange is what matters. It doesn't matter if the public response is flat or not, as long as it delivers her promises and it's giving good results, that's what counts the most

If I personally prefer IEO that is in a good exchange, even though the response from the public is not much, but in a good exchange there are always different visitors, so the possibility of success will be very visible or there, so I prefer IEO on the top exchange.

I think if we wait for the previous public response, we will miss the train

No matter how good a new project is if it get listed on a low exchange problem will start from there, unless the project introduce something that crypto users can't do without, a very strong use case and exchange won't matter because there will always be high trading volume as far as people are buying

Never done it myself. Sort of some regret but when I see all the other IEOs that do badly, I'm happy I never took any of the early ones. I've given up on thinking I can get in early on something big, although if it's something I actually really like and really love like maybe Telegram one, sure, but even then, not to actually invest thousands. Just the few dollars I can afford:)

it's not a problem this fact has happened or not, it's a matter of possibility, maybe something like that happens or maybe it will even happen, and I don't need to be busy looking for accurate data about this, if you want field data, do your own research.
I think there might be a developer out there, who has a good connection, ideas, and a lot of money to enter the top exchange, but ignores the basic thing that is demand, he has an idea, he has capital, but if he ignores the needs of the public, the project will be a loss,

Of course I would choose a performing project even if the exchange is not on the top of the list. Anyways, I think no IEO projects would list on top exchanges and do nothing. They pay for the listing and it is understandable that they want to make profit from their inveemts too.

IEO on major exchanges is the only choice. Just look at the numbers of investors that are taking part in Binance IEOs and those that are investing on Latoken or Probit. It is not comparable and in general you question can be answered only in one way.

Obviously IEO is perfect now this time for a successful project but yes you are right top exchange listing IEO Everyone investors want yet. Actually i do not follow a IEO add which low volume exchange since i also like this Exchange IEO binance, kucoin. Recently i was participating one project IEO harmony in exchange binance so this luck my some profits.

Credibility is a must for selling concept of a project. So investors and traders are always on the lookout for credibility of a crypto project and on which exchange it will launch IEO or list. If a crypto project launches its IEO on reputed exchanges like binance, bittrex, it will obviously attract as many as investors and traders.

Or they are listed in an exchange but yet you need to first do some swapping in their website that will take months before it will be finished.
That is just the same as waiting for an ICO to be listed or the distribution.

But with your question. It is all negative. Better get away from those types. There is surely regret afterwards.

Support of the people and investors is the key for it to succeed. Without it how can it even move?

First there is rarely a large exchanged IEO that has no hype. secondly has there been a small, very successful IEO in the market that survived. I don't think so.

so if there is a question like you said, I'm sure to choose the first choice. IEO on the top exchange but the public response is flat. maybe when IEO doesn't look too good, but when their coins can be traded you will see that large exchanges have a big impact on new projects.

For me, first of all the project itself should be good and potential. Only then, the project can attract as many as investors. For me, it does not matter on which exchange, a potential project launches its IEO. What matters for me is the project should be legit and should have enough potentiality to grow in the future.

You don't see the success of Binance IEO like celler network or Harmony, as you said public response wasn't flat. Even Harmony doesn't wants to run IEO with all token. Public response is nearest to zero if IEO is run in shit exchange. Always I like top exchange IEO like Binance or Bittrex exchange.

This requires in-depth analysis. We must ensure that enthusiasm is not just hype that will soon disappear. However, the market response is crucial to the formation of a strong ecosystem to get the best price. Demand and supply are very important, right? So it would be better to choose a good and strong project that IEO in a trusted exchange.

Don't look at the behavior of the public. Some exchanges specifically simulate the hype with the sale of their IEO for a few seconds and then show that their IEO could earn X5, which does not really happen, because they deceive you. This need to boost interest to Icon their exchange in next time.

I think the question is rather absurd, because generally IEO on top exchange actually has a very enthusiastic response from the public. Because they already have excellent credibility and reputation, that's why they get top positions among other exchanges.

Better on IEO with top exchange market because many investor will be there and leave with an IEO listing on lower exchange because just few investor will be active there.

I tried to participate in the Binance IEO before the lottery, but I didn’t have time to buy coins in the first seconds of sales. I think that the best strategy now is to buy those coins that are listed and have fallen very deep

I am not sure that IEO on the shit exchange gives investors enthusiasm. I am sure investors who will invest in IEO will definitely consider the credibility of the exchange.

So far I have never seen a successful IEO on shit exchange. I actually see a lot of IEO success in the top exchange like binance.
And as an investor I would definitely choose IEO on the top exchange.

Successful IEO's are surviving from this market conditions even in somehow it will fell and make some bad downfall but the good catch is investors who participated already get the slice of profits before the market suffers, it's wise to choose IEO's who do have long term projection teams that have real intention to create service/products that will lead to a successful business outcomes.

i will prefer join IEO on top exchange altought public respon is flat, i believe the team and developer of exchange not listing IEO without do any research before, that mean with top exchange as backed up usually the IEO will success too.

I think your question makes no sense at all, it is clear from the two choices you asked, no one will do it, because if you choose one of these options, of course only the loss we can get. ;D

We started to forget the basic, what makes some project so special and valuable? product and community. IF the project gets a flat response from the public, that means the project is not attractive and there will be no demand. An exchange is not a liquidator but it is a place for the buyer and seller to meet.
even if you are listed in Nasdaq, as long as nobody is willing to buy it. The price and the project will be gone in no time.
and even if it gets listed in an unpopular exchange, as long as the exchange is working fine. The project and the price will survive and it might get better.

I like join with EIO on top market, have big chance get much profit than with IEO on small market. Fact for IEO with small exchange never could raised higher than IEO price.

Exchange credibility is very important in conducting an IEO, the credible the exchange is , the more the investors will believe the project has a high chance to become successful.

Evening everyone. And what I have also noticed - today investing and trading are a bit more simple, if advanced platforms are used.

What do you mean by advanced platforms? Sorry, don't fully get what you mean

Well, not so far ago we used to be reading many books, attending lectures etc to get some basis of trading or investing. And today there are some paltforms that automate the process, making everything available even for newcomers. But of course, we should be careful in choosing such. Only best and most advanced ones must be taken into consideration

Oh, I haven't heard of such before, to be honest. Any examples?

The most advanced one these days is Hodium. You must have heard of them if you are deeply into crypto, as they are truly popular these days.  In few words, Hodium leads the investment industry, offering an ultimate solution that is applicable for both experienced traders and beginners, cause platform is automated ;) and profits are up to 1.5% a day, if I am not mistaken. Really high. And I recommend you to check out more about what the guys are bringing on their website - Hodium com

Wow, sounds very attractive and interesting. For sure will have a closer look shortly, thanks a lot for your recommendation

Yes top exchange i always follow binance like which project want start IEO in this exchange. We are knows everyone binance is most popular exchange platform with more volume and top list number one, so here everyone coin will be successful token sales and investors makes profitable.

I believe if you take out time to thoroughly analyse this question, you will find out the truth for yourself. Pefrsonally, I would rather an IEO on a top exchange with flat response from the public, rather than an IEO on a shitty platform with great enthusiasm from the public. Reason is that, I believe that the public will soon come to approve the IEO on a top exchange, as the reputation of an exchange can greatly affect an IEO.

To answer your question, there is need to come from different angles; if an IEO is done on a top exchange but the community members or public aren't welcoming it as it should be, then there is high tendency of that the IEO not be ground success. Also, talking about a shit exchange; one thing they are known for is low user base so any IEO done there might struggle to become a success, this is one of the reasons why most projects will run IEOs in two exchanges so as to increase their success rate. So in all ramifications, the exchange an IEO is taking place on matters, and also the response of the public matters as well.

This is not a very probable situation, since mostly good reputable projects go to the best exchanges to perform their IEO, so it's better to look for these kind of projects.

I think that you should go in the way that brings more value to your pocket or to the project's pocket. Going to forbidden/shitty exchanges might turn to be valuable, the thing is that you could never assume the real response of the audiences lockated in this type of exchanges. The hype is the real thing that brings investors into the IEOs, you should be wise and you should pick one. If i was in your place, i'd pick the most trustworthy choice out there, the trust is the factor in the cryptocurrency but peoples are running behind the cash flow and not thethe trust which is the true value which is the only road to success.

both are bad things, like being forced to choose 2 options, stranded on an uninhabited island, or entering cannibal tribes.
but I will choose listing on credible exchange even though the hype is low but I have a sense of security and hope.

True value or true cash flows can be fake inside shitty exchange you must be aware of what you are picking, but if you have the courage to take the risk and you are willing to take chances, there's always opportunities that open it's door for every investors that will take extra steps. Your money is the very important factors of your investment, you should be firmed aiming for making extra out from your invested funds.

Despite the fact that IEO is presently better than ICO or any other form of fundraising, it has been a challenging situation whether it is done on big or small exchange. The best now is that IEO should be very much accompanied with with good and acceptable or better still globally useful product. That a lone can Hall to attract a lot of investors.

Usually IEO which is held in global exchanges such as Binance, Okex, Huobi, attracts a lot of investor interest, so market demand will increase. That increases the opportunity for prices to exceed ROI many times over. Of course, not all projects can qualify and can join the big exchange, there are many considerations, so most projects choose an exchange that has a reputation that is not as good as those exchanges. It doesn't matter if the project is really good and promising, you have to make sure by doing maximum analysis, don't just get caught up in the hype.
https://i.postimg.cc/YjBWcPvZ/ieo-eschangenew.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

Doing IEO on shit exchange is obviously a shitty plan. IEO is all about the credibility of exchange you will conducted. You cannot compare the IEO on top exchange like binance on a shitty exchanges that not liquidity. If I am the project owner then I will advise to conduct IEO on top exchanges with high credibility like binance, kucoin, huobi or Okex.

Investor's choice in choosing IEO projects is not based on the exchange rank.
Investors prioritize projects that are developed put forward rather than invest in waste projects.
investors are smart now, they prefer a good investment product for long-term investment without prioritizing exchange rank.
so in my opinion to attract investors is about the product of the project not from the exchange rank.

In this market credibility and reputation matters very Much. So in my opinion majority of the people don't go with an ieo which is listed on a shitty exchange. And also itge project matters a lot . is it good or not that also matter.

It's better to do an IEO in exchange, because if you do in a large exchange then the project is clearly better because it can do an exchange in IEO. The public can self-assess projects that can provide benefits or choose good projects. So there is no need to be afraid if people choose an exchange that is not credible, they will turn to a large exchange if you want a definite project that can provide benefits.

I will not choose both, IEO on a reliable exchange does not mean it will succeed and IEO on an unreliable exchange is also very unlikely to succeed.
I just ignored both 2 IEOs and waited for a good IEO on the reliable exchange.

How if you don't have to invest in any IEO, but you invest in the coins which have a history before? I think that will make sense, especially if you can invest in the right coins and have the potential to increase in the future. If you decide to invest in the coins, then I suggest you go to Binance or the other big exchange, buy the coins and hold it for some time.

It is too risky if you want to invest in IEO even if the IEO is listed on the top exchange because there is no guarantee for you to see the project will get success after it listed. But if you invest in the potential coin, you can have a hope that the coin price can increase in a long time. So you should learn and analyze which one will give you the profit.

Most successful IEO were successful successful not as a result of their prospect rather, the exchange it's been ran on. Many people rarely give thought to IEO prospects instead it's the monetary returns that is major determinant.

Obviously I prefer investing in any good and promising IEO project regardless of the exchange type and value. Of course, the IEOs running in Binance and Kucoin, for example, are generally more trusted than an IEO running in a low valued exchange, but sometimes you can find good projects running in the other exchanges. Its depending on the project itself, not on the exchange.

In essence, the excellence of the project itself can create a lot of interest by investors, but I personally if the IEO that is on the exchange does not have enough trust, I will think twice as much as looking for people who have more trust. if there is currently nothing interesting then I am waiting for the next IEO

IEO on top exchange means that those exchange have credibility and not a shit exchange, do not forget that IEO is just another form of ICO so you can expect different results during the token sale. not all projects that conduct IEO become successful and you cannot blame the exchange only but also the project on how they market their token sale.

IEO or ICO does not matter. They both want a harmony. What is right is to make IEO using the best possible exchange and to direct the community correctly.

now trust disappears and to IEO projects. soon it will be the same as the ICO, a continuous fraud. if you participate in IEO try to choose large exchanges, they at least value reputation

And neither of the choices will be wasted. The exchanges give contribution and big part for the success of a project. Like if it was announced and advertised by themselves, investors will have that confidence that the exchange believes on that project. Once said, the investors will rush to get that coin but it would be costly for them. The choices is simply like this, a dead volume versus an exchange that will give you headache.

Can you describe more about the 'flat' response ? I prefer to joining IEO on top exchanges than on shit exchanges.
You cannot trust your money to some not good exchanges, because we don't want to risk our money too high.

IEO is like ico's wherein it all depends how good the project is not the exchange and etc ,because it's not their fault to be honest  , indeed there work is to advertise it only and if theirs an errors the dev should be blamed no other than. . Unfortunately investors assuming good development on it and all relying on some good exchange because of being so popular , reason they suddenly flip to negativity after experiencing a bad situation and sometimes they blame the owner of the exchange.  Lol

Of course the best option of the two choices is an IEO on exchange that is not credible but the public is very enthusiastic in welcoming it.

Demand is very important in every success of the project therefore if the response is flat, it only means that certain project is a shit one and no one will bother to invest or support it.

It is good to consider all possibilities before choosing which IEO to join. Since not all IEOs can be trusted, it is preferable to choose IEOs hosted by the tier 1 exchanges like Binance, Kucoin, Bitrue etc. These exchanges have high level of credibility and due to their reputation, these exchanges run checks on the projects by collecting proof of doc in order to ascertain the authenticity of the project before hosting their IEO on the platform.

The fact that there's a lots of same people's desire to invest in, and try to find a way earn profits. IEO's which being offered inside big exchange have a high chance to gather more investors to participate. Knowing that being able to catch up will bring good benefits once the sale period has already been done.
If you have the chance and money to invest, it's still good to place your money where most are also investing in.

Better doing IEO on great exchange with you make IEO on shit exchange, impossible listing with shit exchange your IEO get many respond from investor and public, how come they will trust with bad exchange and your IEO be lower price because lower investor want to invest with shit exchange, you can buy with great exchange your IEO coin.

investor will be  very selective while they want to join in IEO.profit rate on exchanges IEO history will be main factors for their decision.only big exchanges such as binance, huobi, gate io or maybe okex that recommended for us if we want to participate in IEO.now days IEO hype decrease alot, and investors get less profits than previous IEO.

I go for the second. So far cryptocurrency is all about to attract as many as investors and traders. If a crypto project with much potentiality fails to attract investors and traders, it may go to a waste. But a project without much potentiality will have a good future if it is supported by many investors and traders.

As I understand, what he wants to say in the first option is sale without demand at the big exchange.
These thoughts are only in writing, real life is very different. Even though shitcoin is sold at Binance, it will not take more than an hour but, sales in scam exchange may be possible depending on the project. However, there is a little possibility in this because good projects usually value investors.

Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.

Each investor is responsible for his actions himself. but if the project could not fulfill its promises and raise the necessary amount of money or could not realize its model, then the responsibility lies on the project and they must compensate money for investors

I prefer the first choice. IEO was heavily exchanged, but public response was flat. maybe for the beginning, this is a little less good. but when the trade is opened, you will be able to see the difference between large exchanges and small exchanges. Large exchanges can increase trading volume, this is one thing small exchanges cannot do. hype won't help when tokens/coins have started to trade, just look at many projects that were initially popular during IEO, but in the end the price is dumped because it doesn't have trading volume.

Weird, top public response on top exchange should be very good because most IEO were sold out publicly there. what do you mean flat ?
I believe investing in IEO on popular exchanges will be better than non credible exchange, because you won't have liquidity problem when the coin being traded after the IEO end.

Speaking of IEO, most investors tend to consider the exchange where the crowdfunding will take place. I guess, the project it self comes 2nd priority or it could be either way depending on the investor. But most likely, an IEO has better chance of getting much attentio  when it is conducted in a famous exchange with big market volume and users. I think it is rare that an IEO would have a flat public response if it is in a top exchange, not unless investors had made a good review or are aware that a project has no potential.

It's better to avoid IEO. it's clear that IEO is just a fundraising scheme and their main intention is to deceive investors. and we must be smarter and not easy to be fooled. we certainly don't want our money to only get junk tokens. so it's better to stop investing in IEO. And I recommend buying your Bitcoin for 3 years

IEO is the top market, because in my opinion all transactions and progress are real, all achievement volumes are real. because the top market has a big responsibility to be transparent. different from the shit market. because of a lot of manipulation, fake achievement to attract people to buy IEO. no transaction transparency. and more bots.

Popularity is sure part of it, but I don’t think that their response to a coin is typically because of the popularity of the exchange alone, there are so many popular exchanges that we have too but people would still be skeptical about joining their IEO, do you know how popular that Yobit is, Yobit is a very popular exchange that there is virtually no one that does not know that exchange, but anytime they release IEO, people are always very careful in reacting to it.

When Binance opens an IEO, people rushes to take it like there is no tomorrow, I think that it is very important to note that the reason why people actually do rush binance IEO is not just based on popularity, but because of their integrity, they believe that Binance values its name so much  not to come up with any project that will tarnish their image.

Doing IEO on the top market is better for us and you as big investor than you have joined with IEO list with shit exchange market, never take risk your money with investing with IEO listed on shit exchange market because almost of IEO listed with shit market have lower price, you have joined with IEO give your big chance for profit and stop joining IEO listed whit shit exchange market because its looks not good price after active trading there.

Just your kind information large and reputed exchanges will be never launch shady projects. Specially all of the Binance launchpad projects was big successful and most of the investors unable to participate on IEO. Top exchanges IEO's must be successful because more competition to invest here likes Huobi,Bittrex,OkEx and KuCoin exchanges already launched a lot of reliable projects. Shit exchanges launchpad projects are most of the failed. So that i will go with first option.                    

Credibility exchange is the most important for any IEO. Just look at the Tecra Coin project, it looked very good and I was very excited for them, but Tecra coin did not raise enough money, because they chose Latoken for their IEO.

If IEO is top notch then why public response is flat? One of the biggest reason why any exchange gets enthusiastic community is due to its unshady-trustful operation. I don't think there exist any exchange which has shit service but good support from community except HitBTC.

I think that is depend what IEO they offer.
But i prefer choose doing IEO on the top exchange, maybe the response is slow because there is bunch ticket from people. We know not small fee to enter IEO, there is also can riskier on exchanges side.
I always avoid that shit exchanges, i believe they can give you some problem if still on that shit exchange.

say everything right, but that there are very few projects that return funds to investors, with insufficient fees, the reason is simply that the funds raised go to the project, and payment for the project participants

If I might be interested in IEO in the top Exchange, why? No possible public response flat. How can the top exchange have no enthusiasm and no response from its community?
But depends on the project that has been opened in IEO whether it is interesting or not? The main purpose of IEO is raising funds.
Maybe my choice on the top IEO exchange that seems to me it's a very good public response.

In my opinion, current IEO projects are often concerned about profit because some of the recent large projects have not had a clear development when the coin is listed at a good exchange. This is a general situation that we are facing at this time so we need to consider when joining IEO. This time is not good for investment and you can easily lose money if not careful.

In fact, some of the coins I know like FET, BTT, TOP, WIN after the end of IEO, these coins have very few new updates to investors.

I doubt an IEO that hits a top exchange would get no response rate. I think the question in itself is a little absurd to be quite honest. I wouldn't think Binance or a huge exchange of that caliber would want to list a crap project that no one would be interested in, so I think your question doesn't make much sense and is totally illogical. I would do my due diligence also on many accounts, not just if investor confidence is big or small on a specific project. I think you need to rephrase your question in a more appropriate way to engage some good debate. I think we need to see more in-depth education for investors in the Blockchain Arean than what we have already, so we can become much savvier as investors over the elong term.

Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat

*If there are no other choices for your next question, I will choose this point. top exchange despite the shady public response (sounds strange)

IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?

*it won't last long, because investors & the public won't welcome nonsense exchanges. they just use it to get rid of junk tokens as soon as possible.

You should not be strict in your thoughts. IEO in nonscam exchange is superior than others. At least you will not come across scam projects. IEO is the developed version of ICO. The issue is that community caught IEO virus. They think the project without IEO is not good but IEO is good when the project is good, the superiority should always be given to the project.

this question is very absurd, how can I choose between the two, if I was told to choose then I would not choose both because it was very risky for me I prefer IEO which has a clear project and a professional team. Not fake!

Correct, IEO is much better than ICO, maybe he was a victim of scam IEO that's why he said those statement, yes, there maybe few projects that are scam and conducted IEO then run away, that is why better to be clever in which project we will invest our hard earned money. But, personally, I don't invest anymore in ICO/IEO, just waiting for them to be listed in exchange first.

well it's risky if we go shitty exchanges because high chance that exchange will turn scam, your money will disappear for sure. Better to the top exchanges even the project is not good or just slow development, but is not a scam project at least. 

Many IEOs are subject to market manipulation and it changes dramatically when new projects arrive. It is also difficult to trust exchangers right now because of the few reports of distrust in IEOs. When we play with the public choice, we will accept greater risks of losing but the income can be so high. I say that it is too good to be true so I rather choose the flat exchange.

I think IEO is better at changing but the response is flat, the reason
if IEO is listed for being a good and profitable IEO, it may not be many people who know it.

While the exchange of nonsense, but high enthusiasm of the community, maybe because it is less thorough before participating in the project because they are tempted to profit and end up scam

There are some basics.

1. IEO in top exchanges will bring the hype naturally.
2. ieo in shit exchanges has the tendency to kill the project faster.

Is any cex exchange credible ? i don't think so
They all charge to list token or list ieos.

  I think doing IEO on the top exchange is always the safe and right choice. Because the IEOs listed on those exchanges are often very potential, appreciated in the future and their value will soon increase rapidly. I love not to trust unpopular exchanges because I am afraid my trading will fail and I may lose money without knowing why.

Exchange's credibility is very important for me when investing in IEO's. I am making sure to invest more in some big exchanges like OKEx and Binance. And be sure to check the credibility since there are some exchange that are having a bad rep such as IDAX scamming some IEO on its very own platform.

The IEOs on the top exchange is not exactly flat. It's just has little growth compared to other IEOs. Other IEOs that are not "credible" or the exchange is not well known, often have bigger estimated profit that's why many people are getting interested. But I will choose those who are in the top exchange because even though the profit is smaller, it is better to be safe than sorry.

For me the credibility of exchange which the IEO takes place matter to me a lot because, if the exchange is be for the product, then the project will see the light of the day. I have been a hunter and have discovered that, a good exchange will always bring into the project potential investors which are ready to invest. Shit exchanges will not draw the attentions of the investors to any project, reason why many project failed today.

I think that for IEO in any case you need to choose a good exchange. If it is held on little-known exchanges, the probability that this project will not be successful is much more.

Oh come on , this is a low questions addressed to us. There is only 1 answer to that and its to make everything public and choose a strong exchanges in order to catch real investors who may burst the certain project to high stakes.

Besides this , IEO's are not a good thing right now so no wonder why we see IEO's moving to BINANCE , as they got the idea that if they remain anonymously during IEO and choosing a tier3-4-5 exchanges won't bring them any extra credibility.

I think this is the reverse when it comes to real practice. Most tines, if not always, top exchanges, get more responses from the community, than the unpopular one. Well, if this now happens otherwise, I will go with the option of a second class exchange that will yield better result with the community.

What you should understand about investing into new crypto project is that, where it is running an IEO on a top exchange or on a normal or shitty exchange platform, your focus as an investor should be how realistic and feasible this project is in terms of its set aims and vision. A project might run its IEO on a top exchange platform, but its ideology may not be reasonable and unrealistic. Invest in the idea rather than how the public is relating to it...

OMG, you just took the words out of my mouth ;D. frankly speaking i read over his question several times before i was able to understand what exactly he was trying to say. You are right, every good investor into crypto projects would want to put his/her funds in a project which has a potential of surviving in this competitive industry.

I'm sorry dude, i do prefer to ignore that choice. That purely gambling for me. It will be better if we using money for something that is real. We can go to major exchanges and we can choose freely what project we interested in then analyst before buy them. High speculation can make everyone loss everything, so if you confuse about that, just ignore them.

Will be IEO listing with top exchange respond public is flat? many investor like for investing money in IEO listed with top exchange market, they will invest with higher amount because after listing have higher price and many investor miss with IEO chance will buy after open for trading, when you choosing for investing IEO listed on shit exchange you have ready faced with lost your money because not many investor there.

IEO that is suitable to be followed is only a good exchange such as binance exchange because of course we do not want to make wrong decisions. I myself have not invested in IEO other than binance because that the risk is quite high.Everyone's judgment about an exchange is different

Questions that keep people from choosing one. If IEO is carried out on a large exchange such as Binance, the possibility of failure will be very small because there is already a lot of investor enthusiasm, and to enter the IEO binance there are many choices and expensive fees, if not successful, there are only a few possibilities. but if IEO is carried out on mediocre exchanges it is very difficult to succeed, moreover the projects listed are not well known and not many people know. It all depends on the marketing of each project and the credibility of the exchange.

If you think that IEO will guarantee the success of raising funds then you are totally dreaming because crypto investor are getting smarter now after having a bad experience on scam projects. They are now making their own research about the project before investing so even if a new project launch their IEO on top exchanges, it doesn't mean that investor will invest right away though you can get a lot of hype since those top exchanges have a big community.

I think there no IEO done on top Exchange but the public response is flat Because if they do IEO on popular Exchange like Binance or Okex then of course the public interest is very high. IEO which registered with a large Exchange is certainly preferred by many people.

Given there's no credibility for an ieo, there won't be participants. You can't see a burning flame yet rush to put your hands to be burnt. If there's no guarantee of successful project prospect in an IEO, investors will stay away from it.

I think the IEO on top exchanges are more credible even when response of public is flat provided the project is good. With the passage of time public response may drastically increase then its start hitting the market with good product and good strategy. A trusted exchange is like ice on the cake in such cases whereas IEO on low rated exchange has low exchange my not be doing that good due to low credibility. These are my personal thoughts based on some real life experience.

if I prefer to exchange IEO over even though the public response is flat. because the IEO that is exchanged for the top is a good IEO they will not cheat because the exchange will definitely select the project before it is entered in the token list. they will not risk big-name exchanges by accepting bad projects.
and later when the project is successful there will be many responses and investors who are interested in investing.

up to condition if IEO on project case. if success they will run. if not they will fail. but many not reach as cryptocurrency new one manage by newbie people.

Difficult choice. I think if you want to take profit quickly or play short-term, I choose a lot of hype even though it's shit exchange. It could be a good project but lack of funding or not finding an agreement to enter IEO top exchange. For sure, don't play too long on IEO, fast come fast sell. Because of course whale must be there too.

IEO It is suitable to be followed from a successful exchange project. an example is IEO from Binance. we certainly know that binance provides quite a lot of benefits for their investors by doing IEO and it is very clear that IEO is the most successful of all time

In my opinion, IEO is the fastest way for that project to be successful in this market because the demand for investment in IEO has been on the rise recently so if you can participate in big projects then the opportunity to earn high profits will be very easy. I have participated in several IEO at exchanges such like Kucoin, Binance, Huobi and most of those projects need a lot of luck because not everyone has the opportunity to invest when participating.

Yes indeed. Especially if you are looking for IEO quality coins. Binance's fame is no doubt, includes top 5 exchange at coinmarketcap. But if you only look for profit, I think anywhere is fine as long as the IEO is successful. Because people usually don't think about good coins or shit coins, but crowded or not in trading volume.

LOL, a good project will definitely choose a popular exchanger, and try to attract investors, even more so if the concept covers something new, people will definitely not flat out about it. from the choices you gave, I might prefer the first choice. Well, I think it's quite easy to change people's flat attitude when we offer something interesting.

Yes IEO faster way become success with investing in cryptocurrency but we have invest with good IEO listed with bigger market like Binance and Kucoin, if you invest money with shit exchange for IEO just ready your self for losing money in cryptocurrency. Many investor very angry with IEO developer because price have dump than how IEO price listed for investor.

I think it's better to do IEO in an exchange place that has a high trading volume and as much as possible in the best exchange place because running IEO in such an exchange will provide security when participating in IEO.

if you choose IEO with a lot of enthusiasm. of course if the project is crowded and investors come to it, the project will run quickly and successfully. but where there are large IEO projects that choose in small exchanges, it's impossible for me to happen. I personally prefer to choose IEO projects that are listed on a large exchange, because the project is guaranteed.

Enthusiasm about IEO is not large enough because IEO can still be said to be a new method of investment. so I think in the future if they do IEO in a maximum way and get good results, investors will come. and for IEO problems contained in exchanges with small volumes, it must be considered again because the volume of exchanges can also affect the number of investors who come to the IEO. so it's best to invest in IEO that is in a good volume exchange

do not do both especially for shitexchange in my opinion at this time prone to follow ieo on the exchange, it's better to keep choosing what on the top exchange but as we have several market lists that are included in 20 lists that are included in large exchanges, only we know their performance is only there are some good ones and the rest can also be said to be shitexchange so addressing this we must remain vigilant.

Any ieo on top exchanges do attract public interest because everyone wouldn't want to invest in a failed ieo which is prevalent in the low tier exchanges.

You need to rephrase your question.

Agree, small exchangers sometimes only care about listing fees and don't want to know about the project whether it's legit or not. Large exchangers will certainly maintain their reputation by screening projects that will be listed even though the project is able to pay listing fees at high prices

But there are also risks in IEO investment nowadays, scammers are now creating fake IEOs where they deceive people in order to earn money. I also participated in IEOs and I have good results.

Yes indeed, as long as the world of crypto is still running, scammers will always be there looking for gaps and opportunities to benefit from others. But I think to make IEO in top exchange like binance difficult for them, related to administrative matters. Because fake projects are very reluctant to reveal their identities.

I think that large exchanges also do not study the projects well which they listing/making IEO on their exchange. I think that now everyone cares about money but not reputation

Why would I go with the IEO were the exchange is not credible, of course the credibility and reputation of the platform is still significant to me. Even the public are enthusiastic about it, because it doesn't matter to me. In short I will go further with the IEO that has a platform were in the market has a good volume and huge traders too.

Reputation = money. It is worth a large exchange to place a scam project at home, as its reputation will collapse instantly, which will lead to an outflow of users from the exchange and its further boycott.
All subsequent fundraising will fail, which will not bring any profit to the exchange.

With markets like this, even IEO held by large exchangers with good reputation will get a flat response, it is proven that IEO held by binance are not like in July and August, so I think the market interest in IEO also depends on market conditions,
so if I was told to choose I would choose the IEO held by large exchanges but also at that time the market conditions were good.

IEO  were accepted with enthusiasm by the community. Now the hype is decreasing. Again, now every new exchange is ready to conduct IEO,because for IEO the project's team needs to pay a large sum. If I choose IEO,I will choose large reliable exchanges for this.

i choose the first, safety always be first , as long i do on top exchange, i totally sure project is real , and about ROI ? well, its just about time.
and also , did u believe IEO from shit exchange have a huge enthusiatic from public ?
its probably just manipulation.

in my opinion the best thing is that the IEO on the exchange is not credible or bullshit exchange, but the public enthusiastically welcomed it.. because a lot of IEO has been done in a large market but not listing in a big market.. which will ultimately make us feel disappointed.

yes, many cases like that buddy. IEO is in large exchange only as an effort to increase purchases of tokens for sale. but shortly after the sale is completed the token is not listed on the exchange but on another exchange which has smaller trading volume. it makes investors who have joined and bought tokens like fool. like binance itself will delete some tokens that do IEO in their exchanges even though they have been traded on their exchanges.

I wouldn’t choose IEO at all now, because even on the large exchanges, now after listing, the price of coins drops by 2-3 times. Only at Binance can give to us some profit, but there you need to hold a large amount of BNB

if there are only two choices above, maybe I would personally choose Doing an IEO in exchange for but a flat public response rather than a bullshit exchange but the public enthusiastically welcomed it ... why? usually the IEO at the top exchange still has a chance to get good results but in contrast to bullshit exchanges, most of them are just scams. the people who welcomed him were one of the scamers.

At times I feel that every exchange has some kind of deal with particular project and they offer interesting deals regarding that project. Like you mentioned binance which wants users to hold BNB in order to use their great services and enjoy decent profits. I hope there would be soon an exchange launched which meets all the needs of people in right way.

Probably happened most of the time, scammers pretend to be the buyers or the one who are supporting the project inside shitty exchange, making things believable from investors eyes. It's better to take the risk using top exchange even the response is in Fiat the chance to grow and success is much higher than shitty exchange where the chance of being scam is high too.

The most important thing to remember is that a popular exchanger will not choose the project blindly. So that their reputation remains good, they will certainly choose projects that have interesting concepts and trusted team. So, even though it has a flat response, I think it is indeed far better than choosing IEO in a bad market.

Everyone wants to make a profit in investing and if given the choice as you say (OP), there is no good choice, surely everyone will not want to invest in one of them, especially in an exchange that is not credible and crap projects. So this is not an option
A good IEO is available on exchanges that have high credibility and that is certainly a lot of demand

I think that even on large exchanges very soon new IEOs will stop to be interesting for investments. IEO investment trend is becoming less and less popular