Bitcoin Forum

Note: If you're appealing, avoid quoting all reports or your reply will be deleted, only quote your own case (edit out others cases) to keep the thread clean.

Just as the title says, if you're participating in my bounty or signature campaign and noticed you receive a red feedback from me then you can find the reason behind that feedback on this thread with full details.

This thread is strictly for detailed reference of my feedbacks for those in a campaign under my management, you can appeal if you feel I made a mistake.

If the thread is locked and you want to appeal, you can write me and it'll be opened for that purpose only and after conclusion, topic will be locked so it can only serve its purpose of creation. Avoid quote spamming or your reply will be deleted.

Ps: Thread is self moderated to moderate spams, this privilege won't be misused or abused.

Case 001: Meme Plagiarism.
Details: Mohammed2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3253635) with telegram username @Mohammedshisir is claiming a meme belonging to this user Martin jack (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2086836;sa=summary) with telegram name @selfishk as his. As showed on this bounty report, he submitted this users memes as his creation and was willing to recieve reward for it.

Image proofs
https://i.imgur.com/nMNjlgv.jpg https://i.imgur.com/itX52H3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/1MGwgSR.jpg

First Image is proof that @selfishk posted the meme earlier on 12th august, 2021 before @Mohammedshisir posted his and submitted for reward.

Archives:
Mohammed2 bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/FerO4
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.

Case 002: Meme Plagiarism.
This user @Samzvai (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2630256) is guilty of stealing memes and posting them as his for reward.

Image proofs
https://i.imgur.com/ntEYLdK.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fMK8RJG.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/xHTsbid.jpg

Archives:
@Samzvai (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2630256)  bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/KdFDi
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.

Case 003: Signature Cheater.
Details: nhaila (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=996222) is guilty of swapping between two signature campaigns and recieving reward weekly with the same posts. The two projects involved are;
[BOUNTY] Moobet.io Signature Campaign | 2 Weeks | _Updated Rates _ [w/ESCROW] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5392937.msg59750797#msg59750797) managed by julerz12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950662)
Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign | Budget: $50k ~ Bitcoin | 8 weeks. Escrowed. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5390603.0) managed by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Archives:
Moonbet
Archive: https://archive.is/h9ybb
https://i.imgur.com/FMgKj2H.jpg

Seasonal Tokens:
Archive: https://archive.is/TO7yf
https://i.imgur.com/ZzVClAT.jpg

After an anonymous tip last week, observation were placed on the account after discovering this act of his. Stakes weren't denied last week just to avoid raising suspicions. After recieving stakes for this week promotion, the user switched signature code immediately as to be eligible for weekly stake of Moobet (which the manager is also aware of).

Judgement: Red feedback and removal of all previous stakes in accordance to signature rule 5.

Another merit hunt, I wouldn't be surprised if the new "detective" opened an alternate account.

@Thenoss, why are you overwriting alternative accounts already found earlier? I searched the mail "Email: bahadurmunir1@gmail.com".
The search shows that your supposedly "found" accounts were already present on the forum. They were discovered earlier by the same "unfortunate detective" as you, who also regularly raised his "investigations"

https://i.ibb.co/55whLqV/Screenshot-1.png (https://ibb.co/4j3RpBx)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg59349390#msg59349390


This is  warning, if you decide to look for alternative accounts, do not duplicate other people's posts. Check it out completely.

I will check all your searches. I'm pretty sure you're an alternate account that was previously banned from posting in a certain thread for your wrong investigations.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3446063

edit

Didn't have to search long. Again, copying previously found accounts.

A little off topic.
How do you fight with copy/paste tweet?
There are a lot of cheaters who copy from others and tweet as their own and submit for stake. I was able to find a lot but I think there are more cheaters which I can't find.

I see you launch campaigns as well, how do you tackle that?

For us, we tagged caught individual on spreedsheet depending on their crime and they lose eligibility for campaign. e.g
Cheater (Submit Others works)
Cheater (Sent Previous works report) etc.

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

[/quote]

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
[/quote] Yes. I am saying these word. But your words are very clear

Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room

I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.

 Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.

I m not giving excuses to you. I have only asked for the criteria of one person with Two accounts. Could you plz provide?
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.

Sir, I have nothing to do with these accounts and the voice is not the same. On what basis are you saying that this is one person's account? You can check out more of my videos, please. You can check the arrow. And besides, I can't change the computer system, so thousands of computers use the same window. You can check that the sound is not the same. Secondly, you can check the work of my account and their account. I strongly condemn such a move and I will ask my esteemed elders to check once and for all on what basis they have added negatively to my account. And that's my request, check and remove the negative from my account. And if anyone has any proof, I will present proof in my own defense. And if anyone needs proof, let me know.

Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room

I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.

 Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.
[/quote]

Both account article are same just alternate text part.
You catched Don't give any excuses. Both account by you✅


Darth protocol article  (provide just some)

https://ibb.co/TYfT1pR
https://ibb.co/mSfpDwp

https://ibb.co/9pPCHn1
https://ibb.co/02Nm187

https://ibb.co/9HVKvYx
https://ibb.co/TcVQvRH

[/quote] I m not giving excuses to you. I have only asked for the criteria of one person with Two accounts. Could you plz provide?
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.

[/quote] Reply why are u not providing the rules and criteria? Because u dont know.
You only know that using same hashtag, same discription and same room are the criteria to identify one person usibg two accounts. How sad.

Two accounts connected
1. Louis.orhewere (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2628849)
2. Konvict20 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3467537) 

These two accounts are owned by one person. After receiving a couple of negative trust rating on his account (louis.orhewere), he came with another account (konvict20) and sign up on the same bounties as the first account.

Proof 1 ✅

Louis.orhewer has the same Facebook account as konvict20.

Bounty campaign where he signed up with both accounts (ETHAX)
Category (twitter)
Louis.orhewere - 894 (REJECTED)
Konvict20 -1136 (ACCEPTED)

Proof 2 ✅
Konvict20 (0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3) received some BNB from louis.orhewere (0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6)

Tx hash (https://bscscan.com/tx/0xd11efb3dd1ba52e7039007eebc4bfecf34f71f665a50d620f695f0e1a1c2b629)



Proof 3✅
Louis.orhewere has the same telegram username as konvict20.

While some evidence are quite convincing, others aren't and this users are getting a second chance or not been tagged/disqualified from campaign. Some have decided to scarified one account to keep the other in the campaign since we can't have two accounts of so much connections (which to us are alts in the campaign). From thenos findings, there are so many accounts that were already under our investigation due to several exact behaviors, like registering timeframe and report timeframe etc.

If you feel you're been wrongly accused drop your appeal, reach me on telegram through the bounty group (username on timeline) and your case will be looked into. For those rushing to delete accused videos, that does you no good as it doesn't help the situation you're in.

Ps: If you weren't tagged no need appealing as it's obvious there was no enough evidence to consider you an alt by Me. Also avoid quoting all reports, only quote your own case. (Those quoting all reports are getting their post deleted).

These account By One person

1. Thenoss
2. Karish2return
3. Pasa32

see this link already repost DT member see this link ,, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58022313#msg58022313


https://prnt.sc/aDqBnA51GflS

see this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398725.msg60142082#msg60142082


he send him merit see the scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/Fqeooc95KqNj

address connected

https://prnt.sc/XKtiaLSAHaME


THENOSS ALL DETAILS PUBLISHED:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58022313#msg58022313


Address connected: 0x066a9226b7b110db56e497a960ac4b313bca797e


Transaction Hash: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x5bcccc80f8347387eeb51ae90d096429ea6359c2dbff0b0f4de97cc1285b168a



please see this link : https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47




address connected please see this scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/NJJiNdbphid8

It's not 100% valid those accounts got controlled by one person, I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.

many proof in here so check all details

I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.

It's not actually about the rank. You can just simply browse this thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5394559) and see how high-ranking accounts catch bounty cheaters and alt-accounts. Then, it is just simply a matter of copying those required evidence/proofs and creating your own report.
Also, utilizing this site will give someone an ample amount of evidence and information to post on a report: https://ninjastic.space/
This forum also has a search function (if you haven't noticed  ::) )

No, not really.

Knowing where to find proof and the evidence doesn't prove that someone has an alt-account.
Also, having an alt-account isn't really prohibited. Its what you do with those alt-accounts that is frowned upon on this forum (e.g. bounty cheating)

Even if what you say is true, having multiple accounts is not against the forum rules. Cheating in bounty campaigns with alt accounts, on the other hand, is not against forum rules either but is against campaign rules and is considered cheating of other bounty participants. Some bounties have different rules, but almost all prohibit having more than one account participating in the same campaign at the same time.
Therefore, if you are found participating in a bounty campaign with your alt account, you will get a negative tag not because you have an alt account, but because you cheated or attempted to cheat.

You need to start by fully checking all accounts to the end.

Your two accounts presented could be in different branches, by ban.

The account shadik007 has already been banned.

And the second account also violates the ban rule.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5094661.msg60220820#msg60220820

Please pay attention.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can you comment on this?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5394559.msg60221849#msg60221849

Two account By one person
1. Kontor5 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3468499)
2. kitto# (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3328489) (red-tagged)

 reference to trust feedback of kitto# (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3328489)

Proof✅:


Notice how the profile link on user (kontor5) proof of authentication posts always lead to (kitto#) profile page.

There's nothing wrong to have alternative account here as long as you are not cheating or abusing the forum. If you feel you should create an alt account to talk about any specific which may put your original account in danger, you are free to create one.

2 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
   
1.Hridoy44330 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3347313)
2.Dada21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3370156)

Proof:

[ archive (https://ninjastic.space/post/60260848) ]

[ archive (https://ninjastic.space/post/59602293) ]


[ archive (https://ninjastic.space/post/60277819) ]

[ archive (https://ninjastic.space/post/60277819) ]

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0xEb95c6dEEE42Bb098bbb1b228a2aEEB1a7352258


Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

cheating bounty programs.

👉 Seasonal Tokens Campaign 2.0 | Budget: $5k ~ BTC | 5 weeks. ESCROWED. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5400818.0)
manager @CryptopreneurBrainboss

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10_iy0moCEP3exVhfpJijBNEKPM5TG2GknM0VdAkMero/edit#gid=695052286

List of addresses associated with cheaters using others information with a different address in order to get rewards in campaign under my management.

I just discovered a new trend in which involves cheaters using profile of already accepted participants to get reward, they usually altered the usernames so it doesn't match on spreedsheet but links are to others account and foolishly some use this same addresses in the future to enroll in campaigns. A list will be kept to help catch them.

Addresses and campaign cheating on;
Case 004: Impersonation.
Details; irefenx@ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3404939) is guilty of been associated with an address that has been tagged to be a cheater due to it been used for impersonation in the Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) campaign, spreedsheet number 45.
Proof: Archive: https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamr

Judgement: Red trust for impersonation.

The reason why I opened a discussion because the proof isn't enough, but I find it's odds. I didn't mean to defend him, I have guessed he did on a purpose to hide his account, but yeah finally you busted him. It's shame how a cheater act like a good user, seems like he's completed acting degree. Perhaps, we will see another his alt since he's never logged in after got negative trust.

An old farm that @julerz12 discovered has been revived. The owner uses old accounts to register for the bounty.


6 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
   
1.kamaludiniskandar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2318338)
2.santrigrg1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2356214)
3.sukmaja090 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2356198)
4.euceut (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2318345)
5.momosrubak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2318341)
6.alunaluncibanten (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3205213)

Proof:

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5381/53814903.html) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5963/59632865.html) ]

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/407/407160xx.html#msg40716026) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/492/492304xx.html#msg49230422) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53923940.html) ]

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/492/492300xx.html#msg49230043) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5964/59641741.html) ]

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/492/492298xx.html#msg49229810) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5454/54540286.html) ]

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/513/513792xx.html#msg51379246) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5963/59630328.html) ]

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/420/420662xx.html#msg42066253) ]   old account

[ archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5750/57504889.html) ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

cheating bounty programs.

👉 Seasonal Tokens Campaign 2.0 | Budget: $5k ~ BTC | 5 weeks. ESCROWED. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5400818.0)
manager @CryptopreneurBrainboss

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10_iy0moCEP3exVhfpJijBNEKPM5TG2GknM0VdAkMero/edit#gid=695052286


  🚧 [BOUNTY] Trophy.io_________________________________________________[w/ESCROW]. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401570.0)
manager @julerz12

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1H06wI9oyg8jaEm6LAe6saJjj6sIoht5QGUdYQXvuWxI/edit#gid=797962656

2 Accounts connected  (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1. Alamin9884 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1219607)
2. Coinlotre (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2519072)

Proof ✅
Quote from Alamin9884
https://ninjastic.space/post/60367842
Other ninjastic.space link
1. https://ninjastic.space/post/60343919
2. https://ninjastic.space/post/60352481

Quote from Coinlotre:
https://ninjastic.space/post/57267192
Other ninjastic.space links
1. https://ninjastic.space/post/56851021
2. https://ninjastic.space/post/56851181
3. https://ninjastic.space/post/57267187
4. https://ninjastic.space/post/57315117

Miscellaneous: Using the same username once could be a mistake but not when the same username is used by the two accounts at multiple times.

---

3 Accounts connected  (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1. Alamin80 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2205245)
2. Alamin55 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2341407) (red-tagged)
3. Alamin988 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2818632)

Proof ✅
Quote from Alamin80
https://ninjastic.space/post/58539926
Other ninjastic.space link
1. https://ninjastic.space/post/58611429

Quote from Alamin55
https://ninjastic.space/post/58752425
Other ninjastic.space link
1. https://ninjastic.space/post/58674615

Quote from Alamin988
https://ninjastic.space/post/58598442
Other ninjastic.space
1. https://ninjastic.space/post/58568610

Miscellaneous: Again, using the same twitter link once could be a mistake but not when it happens many other times

Why I received red feedback? What is my fault here if someone use my telegram username without my permission? If I use your telegram username without your permission, is it suitable for you to get negative feedback? I don't know who is this "Coinlotre". I am truly saying that "Alamin9884' is my only one account. If someone copy anything without my permission, he/she deserves red feedback. I hope you will remove my red feedback by further investigation. Thank you.

WTF are you talking about?  Your telegram username has been used by at least five or six other accounts on this forum. Some even in threads in which you never posted. How do you explain that?
The account is connected to many accounts already reported for bounty cheating by enrolling multiple alts. I do not know why I haven't tagged you before, but I guess it's never too late.

What a nonsense talk from you! Not only five but also 100 people can post/use my telegram Username for their benefits. So what it does prove? I am saying again that I have no connection with those accounts that you have mentioned. What kinds of DT members you're guys that are unable to find out who is real and who is not? Don't misuse your power. If you have any prove about me then show it. Who use my telegram Username, it's all up yo them and you can take action. Withdraw my negative feedback ASAP.

Quit the gibberish talk. It's highly unlikely that about 10 people will keep your telegram username in their clipboard to use for bounty registration unless it actually belongs to one person.

If it's a case of others copying your POA, at least yours have to be there in the first place but in most instances your username shows up in threads that you've not interacted with. Also, they don't seem to mistakenly post your other details except for the username.

I'd like to weigh in here if I may. I have managed enough bounties to see that there are literally 100s of cheaters in every single bounty. I have seen users impersonate high ranking bitcointalk users and newbies.

Now some of these are actually multiaccounters, but i'd say more often then not, some of the users being accused are getting a bum rap. I think you guys need to provide more proof then seeing a post from multiple users tweeting the same tweet. I can make 10 accounts and do the same thing and essentially fuck over 1 legitimate user.

Wallet connections need to be provided at a minimum. Let's not let scam hunters gain a false reputation by wrongly accusing users.

Neg trust shouldn't be added to a cheater unless you are absolutely sure they're the cheater.

Thank you for understanding my condition. They have no legal prove that I am a cheater. It is not my fault if someone use my telegram username. Someone can do this intentionally or for personal benefits. What can do I here? Without proper proof, how can I get negative feedback. It is not fair at all as I am a legitimate user. I am seeking help from everyone. I want clear and solid solution about it.

Dear, julerz12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950662) and also Dear,  CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091),

We all of hunters/Bitcointalk Members Aware, You Both are Honest bounty manager  in the first row without hesitation. Definitely you both are Respected persons that's why I Calling You sir.

Sir, You and all Bitcointalk members know present situation of bounty campaign. Much Bounty are flop or scam. we get some payment just From you and some Trusted Manager(its minimum Number). Sir, everyone want little more money from difficult bounty, i was on of them. I was joined both bounty campaign mistakenly or Hoping for more payment. But honestly Sir, I Don't want Scamming. I was joined 1st [BOUNTY] Moobet.io Signature Campaign | 2 Weeks | _Updated Rates _ [w/ESCROW] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5392937.msg59750797#msg59750797) managed by julerz12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950662)

And I see that the new bounty one of Escrow Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign | Budget: $50k ~ Bitcoin | 8 weeks. Escrowed. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5390603.0) managed by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

That's why i was change my mind and  join that another campaign

Sir, I was greedy. I'm sorry Please forgive me. I want to stay with you and working for bitcointalk and earning some money from Campaigns. Sir, you both are HUMAN, You can forgive me. If next i will do anything wrong you both can kicking out from Forum.

The Last word: I made a mistake, forgive me.  I will never do it again

- Yours Faithfully

Honesty? Well, I guess we do not see that very often from bounty cheaters. But I doubt that will help you much now. What you should have done was inform the bounty manager of your decision to change the campaign, and to avoid having stakes in both campaigns at the same time.

What I really want to know is why did you wait almost three months to ask for forgiveness? Based on your activity over the past few months, it is reasonable to ask if this is your only account here or just an alt?


This statement makes sense only if you can confirm that this is your first mistake and that you are looking forward to being a positive contributor to this community in the future. Was this the first (and only) mistake you have made in this forum?

When you want to apologies you come out clean instead of trying to paint yourself as a victim. My campaign came out before that of Julerz12 and was already running for one week plus and from the spreedsheet you registered mine first (21st of March, 2022) before Moobet (4th of April, 2022). You thought you were smart and wanted to use same post to recieve payment on Moobet when they launched their signature campaign. Before the anonymous tip, your accounts was already under observation after your avatar was showing that of Moobet during Seasonal Tokens post review.

I and Julerz12 discuss your situation via DM and decided to give you stakes for the week and another week to confirm this observation which you change ads info immediately stakes for the next week were assigned. You were monitored for two weeks before a decision of tagging you came into discussion. For others, don't try cheating in any of my campaign, whenever you're caught you lose it all both reward-wise

I confess my fault and apologize. Hopefully Committee will consider my case and give me a Opportunity :-\
- I will working honestly for this Forum (Promise)

Unfortunately, This forum almost does not offer a second chance most especially to people like you who feel they are smart, and cheat on purpose, and when caught, they come back to play the victim, we all need money, you are not the only one with problems that needs money to sought it out, we all are going through some issues here and there and we all need money, but most of us here value our reputation more than what we earn here because that's the only way to keep earning.
Truth be told, you did not value your reputation in the first place, if you truly did, then you wouldn't have allowed that greed to drive you into cheating in a bounty campaign.
Good luck enjoying this fruit which your labor has brought to you.

Point of correction-- this is not a mistake, no body steals by mistake, you deliberately did what you did, when you were switching signatures so as to get stakes for both campaigns, i believe you did it with your both eyes open, and your brains working perfectly well, how then did this deliberate act of yours become a mistake?
I personally would forgive a scammer, a fraudster, a thief, a cheater, when they apologize ,on the account that they may repent, but if I was a judge, my forgiving you will not stop you from going to jail, you must pay for your sins.

I am in this forum 2017, I am a member, I made only one mistake. You Guys a Member like me. You insult without thinking. Where I have admitted my mistake. thousand thousand Bounty Manager Scamming every day. What Kinds of step you're taking? Bounty manager when give stake on spreadsheet why some time mistake there? Why need to appeal for stake? If you have power you will ban Bounty Manager for her mistake? Or Put them to jail?( https://t.me/BrainbossBountyGroup/52779)

anyone’s never mistake on this Forum?

If what you say is true, then perhaps you can explain this:

Case 1:

(archived (https://ninjastic.space/post/53533985))

That same telegram username @onyka73 was used by other accounts even before you: https://ninjastic.space/search?content=%40onyka73

1. cryptofarid10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2323298)
2. Motin9 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2367176)
3. MOOMTUCH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2575422)

All of these accounts are already tagged as bounty cheaters or worse.

For example:

---

Case 2:

(archived (https://ninjastic.space/post/53771455))

That Facebook profile was used by at least 5 other accounts on the forum, including the aforementioned Motin9:
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=angela.ummi.5

1. Motin9 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2367176)
2. MOHIN93 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3272230)
3. AU4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3394117)
4. U4A (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3441196)
5. Urmi3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3480406)

Account AU4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3394117) is linked to another group (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg59581103#msg59581103) of alt accounts and already tagged for bounty cheating by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Should we continue?

You made a mistake when you decided to buy someone else's account. From this step, you cannot say that your mistakes were isolated
In addition, the findings of Stalker22 indicate that living in truth is not your business. You are very greedy.


Are India and Indonesia the same thing? :D
The first posts are written in the Indonesian section.


Also, can you explain one more thing? Did this user sell their account to you?
wiss19 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=878554)?

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0x015839cdfB6331Dfdc6964c6734734B4f1D3A1a2

Thank you for admitting your mistake. and for your apologies, I think everyone can accept and forgive anyone who made a mistake.
but you must remember, that every mistake (intentional or not) will always have consequences. and you've got it. I hope you understand.



If all you think of an honest job on this forum is only about bounty campaigns, you are thinking wrong.
if you want to continue everything then go for it. The red tag in your account shouldn't be a hindrance if you want to be an honest person.

This still does not explain the use of the same profiles from other social networks, such as twitter and facebook...
But since you asked for it, I will continue my investigation:

Case 3:

Last year, in the Ethernity.CLOUD Bounty campaign, you made a POA post with the wrong account, which links you to another alt account of yours (this is the eighth one already, if I am not mistaken):

8. Tybi (http://)

Proof:

https://i.imgur.com/CHHHmdn.png
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5354912

And you did it once again in the Cat Fish bounty campaign:

https://i.imgur.com/QWxMpvv.png
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5357709

Account Tybi (http://) is self admitted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277020.msg57956604#msg57956604) alt account of another group of already tagged bounty cheaters.

Trust summary for Tybi


Should we continue?

@Brainboss, Please check the Alt account below, it looks like they are all involved and cheated in the campaign you are managing, proof of connection has been published by @lovesmayfamilis.
Below this.



Proof of the account registered and involved in the campaign: Nody.ai, and can be seen below, the Articles section: spreadsheets (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V-G9ioeEJLddPfSDTMmlNbBH3ki8sgTeP_dYRKrCWFk)
https://zizihub.com/959664.jpg
https://zizihub.com/9fea71.jpg

---

Additional Alt accounts, involved cheating, namely: @Badboster linked to @Jumikha.

1. Badboster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2120022)

Proof:

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/T7mJA) ]

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/a6FY2) ]

---

There seems to be more.