{Reference} Detailed reasons why you recieve a red feedback from me [campaigns].

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Note: If you're appealing, avoid quoting all reports or your reply will be deleted, only quote your own case (edit out others cases) to keep the thread clean.

Just as the title says, if you're participating in my bounty or signature campaign and noticed you receive a red feedback from me then you can find the reason behind that feedback on this thread with full details.

This thread is strictly for detailed reference of my feedbacks for those in a campaign under my management, you can appeal if you feel I made a mistake.

If the thread is locked and you want to appeal, you can write me and it'll be opened for that purpose only and after conclusion, topic will be locked so it can only serve its purpose of creation. Avoid quote spamming or your reply will be deleted.

Ps: Thread is self moderated to moderate spams, this privilege won't be misused or abused.

Case 001: Meme Plagiarism.
Details: Mohammed2 with telegram username @Mohammedshisir is claiming a meme belonging to this user Martin jack with telegram name @selfishk as his. As showed on this bounty report, he submitted this users memes as his creation and was willing to recieve reward for it.

Image proofs



First Image is proof that @selfishk posted the meme earlier on 12th august, 2021 before @Mohammedshisir posted his and submitted for reward.

Archives:
Mohammed2 bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/FerO4
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.

Case 002: Meme Plagiarism.
This user @Samzvai is guilty of stealing memes and posting them as his for reward.

Image proofs



Archives:
@Samzvai  bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/KdFDi
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.

[1714628964]

1714628964

[1714628964]

1714628964

[1714628964]

1714628964

[1714628964]

1714628964

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Case 003: Signature Cheater.
Details: nhaila is guilty of swapping between two signature campaigns and recieving reward weekly with the same posts. The two projects involved are;
[BOUNTY] Moobet.io Signature Campaign | 2 Weeks | _Updated Rates _ [w/ESCROW] managed by julerz12
Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign | Budget: $50k ~ Bitcoin | 8 weeks. Escrowed. managed by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Archives:
Moonbet
Archive: https://archive.is/h9ybb


Seasonal Tokens:
Archive: https://archive.is/TO7yf


After an anonymous tip last week, observation were placed on the account after discovering this act of his. Stakes weren't denied last week just to avoid raising suspicions. After recieving stakes for this week promotion, the user switched signature code immediately as to be eligible for weekly stake of Moobet (which the manager is also aware of).

Judgement: Red feedback and removal of all previous stakes in accordance to signature rule 5.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Accounts are connected
1. Thor00
2. Ali 786

Another merit hunt, I wouldn't be surprised if the new "detective" opened an alternate account.

@Thenoss, why are you overwriting alternative accounts already found earlier? I searched the mail "Email: bahadurmunir1@gmail.com".
The search shows that your supposedly "found" accounts were already present on the forum. They were discovered earlier by the same "unfortunate detective" as you, who also regularly raised his "investigations"


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg59349390#msg59349390

Please try to quote proof of authentication posts instead of just copying them.

The connected accounts have already been reported in this thread: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q1)]

Accounts Connected (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active

1. Son1
2. Ali 786
3. Thor00

This is  warning, if you decide to look for alternative accounts, do not duplicate other people's posts. Check it out completely.

I will check all your searches. I'm pretty sure you're an alternate account that was previously banned from posting in a certain thread for your wrong investigations.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3446063

edit

Didn't have to search long. Again, copying previously found accounts.

two connected account by one person

1. Finixtex
2.   FatWoodJoker

4 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

1. CaCO3
2. Indever
3. Finixtex
4. FatWoodJoker

[Little Mouse]

A little off topic.
How do you fight with copy/paste tweet?
There are a lot of cheaters who copy from others and tweet as their own and submit for stake. I was able to find a lot but I think there are more cheaters which I can't find.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

A little off topic.
How do you fight with copy/paste tweet?
There are a lot of cheaters who copy from others and tweet as their own and submit for stake. I was able to find a lot but I think there are more cheaters which I can't find.

I see you launch campaigns as well, how do you tackle that?

For us, we tagged caught individual on spreedsheet depending on their crime and they lose eligibility for campaign. e.g
Cheater (Submit Others works)
Cheater (Sent Previous works report) etc.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Just connected wallet will get red trust in your opinion?  You both used secondary wallet to sent your busd then you deposit your busd in exchange. same deposit address✅ (and It's  not a first time)


You both are Pakistani guy.Your local language same. Both are facecam in same room.both joined bounty serialy(107,109). How you greedy making video by your kid.

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

[Senialayl]

[/quote]

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
[/quote] Yes. I am saying these word. But your words are very clear

[Senialayl]

Just connected wallet will get red trust in your opinion?  You both used secondary wallet to sent your busd then you deposit your busd in exchange. same deposit address✅ (and It's  not a first time)


You both are Pakistani guy.Your local language same. Both are facecam in same room.both joined bounty serialy(107,109). How you greedy making video by your kid.

I m not greedy. My son has his own account and do work with his own wish. I never compelled him. And if any bounty manager accept his work so it is my son ability that in such a competition he has much knowledge about the projects and rules.

For your information, no interconnected transfers have been proved by you.

Third, what is your opinion about Pakistani guys. Is there any restrictions on these people who are promoting projects to their own people in native language.

Sorry to say but greedy are you who is looking for mere merit by insulting people and disgrace their work.

[Senialayl]

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

Check Their description
They Using same hashtags and Title of video same etc [ 2 accounts by one person✅]

https://ibb.co/Byyc23R
https://ibb.co/njFWZT4

https://ibb.co/dfP623Z
https://ibb.co/X7tF1VV

Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room

I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.

 Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.

[Senialayl]

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

Check Their description
They Using same hashtags and Title of video same etc [ 2 accounts by one person✅]

https://ibb.co/Byyc23R
https://ibb.co/njFWZT4

https://ibb.co/dfP623Z
https://ibb.co/X7tF1VV

Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room

I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.

 Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.

Both account article are same just alternate text part.
You catched Don't give any excuses. Both account by you✅


Darth protocol article  (provide just some)

https://ibb.co/TYfT1pR
https://ibb.co/mSfpDwp

https://ibb.co/9pPCHn1
https://ibb.co/02Nm187

https://ibb.co/9HVKvYx
https://ibb.co/TcVQvRH

I m not giving excuses to you. I have only asked for the criteria of one person with Two accounts. Could you plz provide?
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.

[mujkoliser]

Sir, I have nothing to do with these accounts and the voice is not the same. On what basis are you saying that this is one person's account? You can check out more of my videos, please. You can check the arrow. And besides, I can't change the computer system, so thousands of computers use the same window. You can check that the sound is not the same. Secondly, you can check the work of my account and their account. I strongly condemn such a move and I will ask my esteemed elders to check once and for all on what basis they have added negatively to my account. And that's my request, check and remove the negative from my account. And if anyone has any proof, I will present proof in my own defense. And if anyone needs proof, let me know.

[Senialayl]

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room

I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.

 Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.
[/quote]

Both account article are same just alternate text part.
You catched Don't give any excuses. Both account by you✅


Darth protocol article  (provide just some)

https://ibb.co/TYfT1pR
https://ibb.co/mSfpDwp

https://ibb.co/9pPCHn1
https://ibb.co/02Nm187

https://ibb.co/9HVKvYx
https://ibb.co/TcVQvRH

[/quote] I m not giving excuses to you. I have only asked for the criteria of one person with Two accounts. Could you plz provide?
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.

[/quote] Reply why are u not providing the rules and criteria? Because u dont know.
You only know that using same hashtag, same discription and same room are the criteria to identify one person usibg two accounts. How sad.

[Iadegbola34]

Two accounts connected
1. Louis.orhewere
2. Konvict20 

These two accounts are owned by one person. After receiving a couple of negative trust rating on his account (louis.orhewere), he came with another account (konvict20) and sign up on the same bounties as the first account.

Proof 1 ✅

Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8

Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8

Louis.orhewer has the same Facebook account as konvict20.

Bounty campaign where he signed up with both accounts (ETHAX)
Category (twitter)
Louis.orhewere - 894 (REJECTED)
Konvict20 -1136 (ACCEPTED)

Proof 2 ✅
Konvict20 (0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3) received some BNB from louis.orhewere (0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6)

Tx hash

#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2628849;sa=summary
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Participating Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook
BSC address: 0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6

#Proof Of Registration
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20
Forum Profile Link:https:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3467537;sa=summary
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and telegram
Bsc Wallet Address:0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3

Proof 3✅
Louis.orhewere has the same telegram username as konvict20.

Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20

Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Telegram username: @louwizfino

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

While some evidence are quite convincing, others aren't and this users are getting a second chance or not been tagged/disqualified from campaign. Some have decided to scarified one account to keep the other in the campaign since we can't have two accounts of so much connections (which to us are alts in the campaign). From thenos findings, there are so many accounts that were already under our investigation due to several exact behaviors, like registering timeframe and report timeframe etc.

If you feel you're been wrongly accused drop your appeal, reach me on telegram through the bounty group (username on timeline) and your case will be looked into. For those rushing to delete accused videos, that does you no good as it doesn't help the situation you're in.

Ps: If you weren't tagged no need appealing as it's obvious there was no enough evidence to consider you an alt by Me. Also avoid quoting all reports, only quote your own case. (Those quoting all reports are getting their post deleted).

[farukahmed]

These account By One person

1. Thenoss
2. Karish2return
3. Pasa32

see this link already repost DT member see this link ,, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58022313#msg58022313


https://prnt.sc/aDqBnA51GflS

see this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398725.msg60142082#msg60142082


he send him merit see the scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/Fqeooc95KqNj

address connected

https://prnt.sc/XKtiaLSAHaME


THENOSS ALL DETAILS PUBLISHED:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58022313#msg58022313


Address connected: 0x066a9226b7b110db56e497a960ac4b313bca797e


Transaction Hash: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x5bcccc80f8347387eeb51ae90d096429ea6359c2dbff0b0f4de97cc1285b168a



please see this link : https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47




address connected please see this scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/NJJiNdbphid8

[Apocollapse]

These account By One person

It's not 100% valid those accounts got controlled by one person, I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.

I take back my words, it seems @Karish2return didn't accidentally copied @Thenoss applications since @Thenoss using that's address too in many bounties. The interesting thing is why @Thenoss edited his applications and hide his address? Does this mean he scared if someone find him using 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47 address since it's linked with @Karish2return (@Karish2return account already red tagged, the other account deserve a red tag too since he's the one who control those accounts).

Forum Username: Karish2return
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47

Original application

Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3470702
Wallet: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
https://ninjastic.space/post/60018943

Updated application

Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG

If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47

Waiting for other users to react on this issues.

[farukahmed]

These account By One person

It's not 100% valid those accounts got controlled by one person, I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.

I take back my words, it seems @Karish2return didn't accidentally copied @Thenoss applications since @Thenoss using that's address too in many bounties. The interesting thing is why @Thenoss edited his applications and hide his address? Does this mean he scared if someone find him using 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47 address since it's linked with @Karish2return (@Karish2return account already red tagged, the other account deserve a red tag too since he's the one who control those accounts).

Forum Username: Karish2return
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47

Original application

Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3470702
Wallet: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
https://ninjastic.space/post/60018943

Updated application

Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG

If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47

Waiting for other users to react on this issues.

many proof in here so check all details

[Nexcital]

I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.

[julerz12]

I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created.

It's not actually about the rank. You can just simply browse this thread and see how high-ranking accounts catch bounty cheaters and alt-accounts. Then, it is just simply a matter of copying those required evidence/proofs and creating your own report.
Also, utilizing this site will give someone an ample amount of evidence and information to post on a report: https://ninjastic.space/
This forum also has a search function (if you haven't noticed   )

Isn’t it strange?

No, not really.

It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.

Knowing where to find proof and the evidence doesn't prove that someone has an alt-account.
Also, having an alt-account isn't really prohibited. Its what you do with those alt-accounts that is frowned upon on this forum (e.g. bounty cheating)

[Stalker22]

I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.

Even if what you say is true, having multiple accounts is not against the forum rules. Cheating in bounty campaigns with alt accounts, on the other hand, is not against forum rules either but is against campaign rules and is considered cheating of other bounty participants. Some bounties have different rules, but almost all prohibit having more than one account participating in the same campaign at the same time.
Therefore, if you are found participating in a bounty campaign with your alt account, you will get a negative tag not because you have an alt account, but because you cheated or attempted to cheat.