Bitcoin Forum

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09959.html

https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3714/14289076985_68679ed70d.jpg

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09963.html

https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3685/14289061745_9e1a638f47.jpg

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09964.html

https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3801/14289093755_d88d3c1907.jpg

https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3801/14285777731_a949ccbf65.jpg

That's my definitive proof clearly showing that Satoshi Nakamoto is indeed James A. Donald, unless I'm missing something so obvious like: Satoshi Nakamoto is so God-like, not only was he at his computer, at the ready, for the first question pertaining to Bitcoin, but when it finally arrived one day later, he not only was able to read the content, but fired up a detailed response, then click post, all within...wait for it...42 seconds.

I can only imagine Satoshi jumping into his DeLorean E-MC² and heading on down to Milliways after accomplishing such a feat.

I might as well lock this thread now, for no further discussion is warranted, but I guess the most prudent thing to do is see if the poll reflects my claim.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Does it really matter who Satoshi is?

Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?

I often wonder if most of the things you write are just meant as a joke or if you are serious.
In case you are serious:
A timestamp is not really proof for anything. I saw a lot of cases where timestamps are just wrong.

I think Satoshi Nakamoto does not exist!

People let Santa Claus mess with their children every Christmas so no, not really. "Sit in my lap and whisper what you want in my ear and I'll give you candy." Really?

Anyways, now let's wait for a new message to pop up like the last one about the other Satoshi, "I am not James A. Donald."

Who is James A. Donald by the way ? I just found a wikipedia editor of this name, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_A._Donald, but no wikipedia entry !!!

Well spotted, although could it be due to a regional daylight savings time difference which changes around Oct/Nov and the timespan 1:00:42?

http://www.metzdowd.com/

https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2928/14102834957_fe34912134_b.jpg

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/perry-metzger/4/71a/159



https://www.linkedin.com/pub/gavin-andresen/1/797/698

Exactly 42 seconds. No added minute.

17:56:27 - 17:55:45 = :42

That's my timestamp, and I'm sticking to it.

If you look up the same mail dialogue at other archives you'll see different timestamps:
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.general/month=20081101
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/136763

Without being able to look at the original headers, I don't know what the exact sending times could be.
The mit.edu archive has header lines that look plausible and might be from the original mails:

As you see, these timestamps claim different timezones, and are almost 2 hours apart, which is perfectly reasonable. Whether they are correct is another question, +1000 is in use in Eastern Australia and Siberia, while +0800 would be used in Western Australia and China. These do not necessarily indicate the actual location of mail users, of course.

Onkel Paul

Looks like J.A. may have been stirring the wrong pot: http://marc.info/?l=cryptography-randombit&m=137849729602738&w=2

What IS up with Wasabi Systems?

April 2009:
http://tech.nifelheim.info/2009/04/whats-up-with-wasabi-systems-inc/

"Just got off the phone with the former Director of Support Services who worked at Wasabi until July of last year.
Wasabi was indeed a venture capital backed company, and went through a number of ’rounds’ of funding.
Recently my contact received a resume from a former employee of his asking about available openings at his current employer. This was a programmer who worked directly on the ip-san kernel.
Also the phone number 757-248-9601 now leads directly to Mr Frank Logan’s voicemail. Frank is / was the President / CEO of Wasabi.
All points I’ve researched show Wasabi to be shuttered.
Anyone have any other clues?"

"It seems they were taken to court (or subpoenad?) recently for patent violation, along with some other storage system vendors:
http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/04/05/New_Complaints.htm"

"The shoe dropped on 3/13. I don’t know about senior management, but everyone else had zero notice. On 3/12, Ian E. had no idea. AFAIK all the physical stuff in the office was liquidated, so Wasabi’s really gone. I don’t know what happened to the IP; I think Frank L. was trying to find buyers for it.
Most of the survivors are on linkedin, and many are still looking for work. I’m sure at least some of us would be willing to take contract work."



At least this guy's got an impressive resumé:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/fglogan

Sorry but I am not seeing proof - I am seeing two emails between two different people.

Can some one please explain like I am five?  ;D

I think James A. Donald was not included in the recent linguistic study:

http://cointelegraph.com/news/111179/what_s_in_a_name_linguistic_study_identifies_nick_szabo_as_the_real_satoshi_nakamoto

It would be interesting to see how close he is to Satoshi compared to Nick Szabo.

The second E-Mail was written at 17:55:45, the third was written at 17:56:27.

Phinnaeus Gage claims that Satoshi can not have read the second E-Mail and answered it in 42 seconds. There for the third must have been prepared before the second was even send.

I say, the timestamps are just wrong.

This isn't definitive proof whatsoever. Feel free to edit your thread name to something less sensationalist

Satoshi is an Aussie

Satoshi is a white male, whom likes anime and Manga.

Prove me wrong

OR... the two parties discussed this privately before agreeing to post the question and answer publicly. If James was anything but certain about the validity of his concern, discussing it privately removes the possibility of publicly looking like an idiot.

OR... the timestamps are updated when an edit is made.

I am more interested in the fact about Gaving being the founder/CTO of Wasabi Systems Inc

OR... it was text snippet Satoshi already had prepared a while before because he was already anticipating questions like those.

I've just checked the mail archive at metzdowd.com (http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/).
The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus.

Just forget it. These timestamps don't prove anything, as they are not the times from original mails.
Of course this does not prove the opposite either, but I don't think that the search for truth works by conjuring up arbitrary assertions and then asking for negative proof.

Onkel Paul

I'm 99% sure it's Nick Szabo

Perhaps you are Satoshi since you are very much against us making progress on his identity.

Well I'm Satoshi just as James A. Donald is Satoshi. Aren't we all Satoshi in a sense?  8)

Seriously, since when is stopping folks who are on the wrong track hindering their progress?
There are many more reasonable assumptions about Satoshi's identity than this mail exchange with obviously bogus timestamps that weren't even in the original mails but most likely generated in some later mail system.

Onkel Paul

If they were one in the same I'm sure James would have waited a reasonable amount of time before posting the reply to himself.

This response is yet another reason I hate people.

LETS use yet another pedo exampe to prove my point and... my example has nothing to do with my point at all..!!! What are you CNN?

I agree with those who said that timestamps are not any proof.

There is something funny in those searchings for Satoshi.
He proved to me that even in the world of computers, Internet and clever people you can stay anonymous if you just know how to do it.

I wish we will never find out who Satoshi is. Tesla should stay anonymous too.

Satoshi! I know that you are reading your forum! It is just something more obvious than a sun on the sky.
I want to thank you one more time for creating a Bitcoin!

I'm sensing a lack of awareness of proper analogies here.   ::)

Exactly.

Yeah, but who is Nick Szabo? Has anyone ever seen a picture of him?

I just found something interesing (as interesting as this thread..:P )

http://cloudfront-media.reason.com/mc/_external/2013_05/bitcoin-guy.jpg?h=266&w=450

looks like a son of:
http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/nakamoto.jpg

:) so maybe Shinichi Mochizuki is real father of a Bitcoin.
And his real father was Satoshi Nakamoto :) and maybe there were problems in his family and he have to give back his son to another family and after all those years his son figured out that he love his real father so he name himself as a "Satoshi Nakamoto" to respect his real father name ;)

Huehue. Conspiracy.

Roslinpl. Me + you = making a movie. NOW. Let's get this script drafted before someone else steals it. This is going to be a better love story than Twilight!

Even if the timestamps are accurate, that question almost appears planted to give the opportunity to lend further credence to the idea in the form of "dialogue".

Still, it's all redundant if J Donald is another alias.

If you plan your whole argument on this, look closer:

Timezone -08:00
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09959.html

Timezone -07:00
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09964.html

Why did Satoshi jump a timezone during the weekend?

Furthermore, why is James A. Donald wasting his time posting about racial violence and useless math trivia, up to Oct 2013, and doesn't participate in Bitcoin?
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=cryptography@metzdowd.com&q=from:%22James+A.+Donald%22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_A._Donald

^^ Nice debunking mate.

Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best,  and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.

You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.

You, my friend, are absolutely correct. I always find it hard to take any "proof" around the forums as being real when everyone tries to fit everything into their mold to show things. People throw around identities all day long and then try to find others that they can mold to fit what they're looking for. Innocent people are being brought into the middle of it as a result.

In my opinion even Phinnaeus Gage don't really believe that James A. Donald is Satoshi indeed :)

But his target to make controversy thread is success :)

Therefore the correct timestamps are: Sun Nov 2 18:46:23 EST 2008 (http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014814.html) and Sun Nov 2 20:37:43 EST 2008 (http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014815.html)

The main question is when will Satoshi spend/donate his million BTC ? He advised us to be careful with our wallets so that we don't waste the bitcoins which will be forever lost if we're not careful so hopefully he has a plan of introducing those dormant coins into ecosystem before they are lost forever.

This was fun, but I read some of James A. Donald's blog and I hope to god he isn't the creator of Bitcoin. Seems that for years, the dude has been drowning in butthurt about "COMMUNIST INFILTRATION OF WIKIPEDIA", the scourge of anti-white racism, et cetera...lol wut?

Come back to us, PG!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=628000

For the record, I will do everything in my power to try and debunk my own or PG's theories - it just hasn't worked out yet.

A lot of people are still thinking that satoshis coins aren't accessible anymore. There are a lot that haven't moved in years.

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App

Its hard to understand that someone who comes up with this idea of crypto currency, spends almost 2 years coding it and making sure every angle is covered, would be so reckless to lose access to his coins. I doubt that and I'd be surprised if thats true. I think what he's trying to do by not spending them is protecting the value but still they'll need to enter the system before too late as they represent 5% of the total and it would be a shame if they're lost forever. Maybe once the sha256 becomes obsolete due to quantum computers, hackers will sweep the old sha256 wallets for lost bitcoins so if Satoshi will still be around by then and hadn't introduced the coins into the system he'll be forced moving the coins into the new cryptographic wallets so I guess either way the coins won't be lost.

Or it's possible that the entire thing was an experiment and he didn't expect it to be so successful. Nobody really knows at the end of the day. Keep in mind that for a few years they had no value.

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App

Oh I love this xD Youre such a good point-prover in a dickish way

i wrote the first line of Bit code

it was #include <stdio.H>

and someone paid me 300 BTC for it!!!!@@

In all fairness, guys, I truly did believe I found the smoking gun. I wasn't aware that there were originals of the emails, assuming all other sites having the same info were just mirroring the main crypto site.

For what it's worth, a discussion is now underway, e.g. Wasabi, et al. of which was also not this thread's intent, for if it was I would state such, or would have presented the info via some other avenue.

That said, I'll now add [Debunked] to the thread's title in all fairly, and appreciate the leg-work done by others to drive that point home.

~Bruno Kucinskas

And, it's truly welcomed, bud.

Does this mean you're back on the trail to find out who Satoshi is again? If so, be sure to keep us updated. You may at some point figure it out, :).

How many degrees of separation do you think exist between Wasabi and In-Q-Tel?

One, if any of its investors mentioned here are associated with In-Q-Tel: http://www.ddn.com/pdfs/TE_DDN.pdf


Why do you ask? "What do you have in mind?"

Here's another quote I'll leave you with: “Hiring consultants to conduct studies can be an excellent means of turning problems into gold, your problems into their gold.”

I'll leave it up to the reader to uncover who said both.

The feeling of being right is independent of facts and truth and is the result of biochemical processes. Sometimes they misfire, for example after prolonged fasting or stress.

Good observations, we enjoy your work and should you fail 1000 times to find the truth once, it would still be worth it. Just be careful of the effects of your discoveries.

BRB, to see why there's a white van parked out front shinin' a red laser beam through the windows. Maybe he just wants Trixie to chase it, but she's asleep on the sofa.

Or they are just dormant so there's a nice incentive for people to try and crack sha256 (it will fall down eventually), then we'll know that it's time to migrate to a different algo.

Sure was nice to have Ken Feldman weigh in on this thread.

https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2919/14045883468_4171bb5e06_n.jpg
Two loving couples on vacation in Egypt in 2008: Ken Feldman with Autumn Radtke, and Michael Terpin with Brock Pierce.

I think it would be sooooo awesome if bitcoin became like crazy big, and then Satoshi air dropped his coins to the poor

Welcome to my ignore list, you insane fuck. Satoshi didn't sexually abuse anyone. What the hell kind of response is this? An insane one.

Thank you. One less person I need to protect from themselves seeing that you're not able to put my post in perspective. Seems to me you may have some other underlying reason for ignoring me, using this mundane post as an excuse. Too bad you'll never read this post due to having me on ignore unless, of course, I'm quoted. BTW, go fuck yourself, and I'll never put anybody on ignore.

PS: You really hurt my feels by putting me on ignore. I duly hope that one day you'll change your mind, fuckface.

whats up with this ignore trend ? everyone on here feels the need to announce when they ignore someone. I see a post a don't like I stop reading I don't need any button for that and I don't need to make it public as if its important lol

Finally, somebody worthy to put on my ignore list.  ;D Thanks, bud, for the thought-out insight, albeit it'd been nice if you'd had penned at least one 'fuck' in your post.

You should really consider posting a Devtome link/ addy. :P

I /we will tip 500 DVC for each troll you PWN and 25 DVC for each profanity you may happen to unleash in the process. ;D

Introducing PWN Coin: The only alt-coin one's capable of En Passant.

Isn't that already hard coded into Bitcoin ? ;D

Just when you think you're in the clear... WHAAMMO ! You're out 1132 BTC.

Only by an entity I highly praised online and off, namely InstaWallat prior to "hack", is all.

BTW, https://www.instawallet.org/w/sMceOus2wYrDVAHxA5BssBwB7kgDqC9r4Q, et al. is completely offline now, in spite of still having 20K wallets to return. Must be nice to be considered Staff on this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1929

lol.. so after the turn of Dorian Nakamoto, it is the turn of James A. Donald to be re-incarnated as the Satoshi. Can we organize a Bitcoin fundraiser for James A. Donald? Just like the one we had for Dorian Nakamoto?

https://blockchain.info/address/1Dorian4RoXcnBv9hnQ4Y2C1an6NJ4UrjX

I am not Satoshi

Yikes ! Now thats En Passant with some added english. ;)

(I was about to go off on this "history of the banks and how they have been screwing us since day 1" tangent... meh.. maybe tomorrow. ;D )

If you can learn who was in attendance and/or in the area while the CIA and CFR meetings were taking place, you will find Mr. Nakamoto.

satoshi - Last Active:  December 13, 2010, 04:45:41 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3

Gavin (and other dev(s)) met with the CIA 4 months later.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.0

Gavin meets with the Council on Foriegn Relations, February 6, 2014.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=412846.0

It doesn't matter who Satosh is. They obviously don't want to be found. No clearer, every prediction and idiotic assumption must be a annoyance.

Swedish bitcoin miner manufacturer joins TBF.

Next day, Brock Pierce is elected to fill the board seat that Mt Gox resigned from, of which Brock Pierce and a former FBI notable, Louis Freek, tried to take over with nary one of us Minions aware of such while in process.

Which is more likely?

James A. Donald
or
Donal O’Mahony

I need to be accused of being satoshi as well. Address below.  8)

Everyone gets a chance eventually. So don't worry too much about it. Your term will also come soon. After all, there are only some 1 million or so Bitcoiners around in this world.  ;D

In the future everyone will have their 15 minutes of satoshi.  :)

That is strange. Perry Metzger joins Wasabi as CEO in 2000 when Gavin Andresen leaves the company he founded. In November 2000 (https://web.archive.org/web/20180501215134/http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/), Perry Metzger creates the mailing list where Satoshi later announces Bitcoin in November 2008.

Seems like more than a coincidence. Were there no other good cryptography mailing lists for Satoshi to announce on?

Satoshi did also announce on gmane.comp.encryption (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=353311.msg3782226#msg3782226) but seems the replies are same such as James A. Donald being first to reply (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.general/12594/).

Note @anonymint recently got in an argument (https://steemit.com/politics/@anonymint/succinct-absolute-truth-about-9-11-and-las-vegas-massacre) with James A. Donald about 9/11.

There is another interesting tidbit about James A. Donald (aka "Jim"):



So I wonder given Jim’s disingenuous debating of the 9/11 issue, if Jim was formerly on the payroll of the CIA or FBI:


Remember that the Neocons and Big Oil were the criminal syndicate involved with the FBI, CIA, the Bay of Pigs, the assasination of JFK, and scapegoating it on Oswald.
@anonymint wrote a blog detailing all that (https://steemit.com/psychology/@anonymint/you-can-t-handle-the-truth). Appears that Jim could possibly be some sort of covert agent.

WTF! Excellent find, bud.

Bruno

To a large extent, it doesn’t matter who invented bitcoin. But based on patents filed in the United States in 2008, bitcoin was created by Neil King, Vladimir Oksman and Charles Bray, who used the same speech figures in the patent as in the work of Satoshi Nakamoto, distributed on October 31, 2008.

It very much matters. Because once you realize who and why they created Bitcoin, you realize it is the 666 system:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4920367.msg44663327#msg44663327

Follow-up detail:

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-goldgoatsnguns-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-bitcoin-rises-because-land-is-becoming-worthless-20180817t223047836z
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-goldgoatsnguns-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-re-anonymint-bitcoin-rises-because-land-is-becoming-worthless-20180719t201058574z
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4920367.msg44422077#msg44422077
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4920367.msg44562788#msg44562788
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4920367.msg44570385#msg44570385
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4920367.msg44577423#msg44577423

Related information:

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/bitcoin-rises-because-land-is-becoming-worthless
https://steemit.com/money/@anonymint/get-ready-for-a-world-currency
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@anonymint/the-real-bitcoin-which-bitcoin-fork-will-win
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/shocking-crisis-coming-to-cryptocurrency-in-sept

Those who created Bitcoin also did this:

https://steemit.com/politics/@anonymint/succinct-absolute-truth-about-9-11-and-las-vegas-massacre
https://steemit.com/money/@anonymint/countries-vulnerable-to-economic-devastation-soon
https://steemit.com/psychology/@anonymint/you-can-t-handle-the-truth
https://steemit.com/funny/@anonymint/don-t-ask-don-t-tell

Does it really matter whether Satoshi Nakamoto is this or that?
It is clear that that name "Satoshi Nakamoto" is a Pseudonym, and for very obvious and credible reasons. But why should an American or Australian or Britain, despite the many other American or Australian or British Pseudonyms opt for Japanese?

I see no reason why this should be heated up. Whether it is Satoshi Nakamoto or James A. Donald does not matter any more. And I do not believe they are one and the same persons.

Actually I do not care about this. They are the ones who believe in and invest in the first bitcoin that they have some huge assets that are accurate, which will make them unsafe if the identity is public.

James Allen Bowery = James A. Donald = Satoshi Nakamoto = edifying conversations with himself to teach what he knew and had proven?

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

https://twitter.com/jabowery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=563xZAV6C-M&t=6682s

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/code/

Odd how newbie comes along and post disconnect stuff akin to the OP of this thread (hindsight being 20/20).

BTW, my new theory is that this James is behind the SN pseudonym: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harris_Simons. Such ticks all the buttons including as to why Halloween 2008, was chosen as the date to release the infamous Bitcoin White Paper.

https://postimg.cc/YGGPWHjK

https://postimg.cc/SJMypBGP

You do very fast research.  

Is Mr. Simons a world-renowned C++ coder too, as Bowery is?


Wiki says: "Simons is a major contributor to Democratic Party political action committees ... Simons has donated $7 million to Hillary Clinton's

Priorities USA Action ... ."


I guess he has abandoned his libertarian ideals since incarnating online as Satoshi.


Believe it or not, I found your thread after comparing Donald's, Nakamoto's and Bowery's writings, with some

personal time-appropriate knowledge from ten years ago to the month thrown in.  Thanks for this thread, though.  Really.


I was one of the first few hundred people to download the BTC software and receive BTC's.

Bowery is followed on twitter by Nick Szabo and Steve Sailer.  You can see yourself.

Allow me to make the Halloween connection, bud ...

Robert Leroy Mercer (born July 11, 1946) is an American computer scientist, who was a developer in early artificial intelligence and co-CEO of Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mercer)

But first ...

Renaissance Technologies LLC is an American hedge fund firm based in East Setauket, New York, on Long Island, which specializes in systematic trading using quantitative models derived from mathematical and statistical analyses. The company was founded in 1982 by James Simons, an award-winning mathematician and former Cold War code breaker. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Technologies)

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-party-donors-villains-heroes-mercers-232156



Rebekah Mercer oversees Breitbart News, of which Steve Bannon was its executive chairman. Nothing in published in Breitbart without Rebekah approval. Further, Breitbart  is extremely crypto friendly. Prior, Steve was the CEO of a company in which Brock Pierce founded, amassing millions prior to Goldman Sachs losing $60M in the said venture ...

Pierce brought in Steve Bannon, formerly of Goldman Sachs and Breitbart News, to seek venture capital and a deal was made in February 2006 yielding $60 million of which Pierce took away $20 million for a minority stake. The next year, facing a class-action lawsuit, the company failed, had no assets and Pierce was forced out. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Pierce#Internet_Gaming_Entertainment)

As for my Google-fu prowess, you have one guess as to who was the key dude in exposing BP, culminating to the following ...

Pierce was elected Director of the Bitcoin Foundation in May 2014. Several members of the Bitcoin Foundation resigned after his election, due to controversy over his association with allegations of sex abuse 15 years previously, as well as concerns about other directors.[17] The organization announced its insolvency in July 2015. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Pierce#Internet_Gaming_Entertainment)

I contend that James Simons put the team together that made up Satoshi Nakamoto and that Nick Szabo was the main public-facing voice behind the nym.

Hmm... make of this what you will, but it doesn't seem Bowery is too keen on accepting the idea of him being Satoshi:

https://twitter.com/jabowery/status/1073103238780596224