Title: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 11, 2014, 07:27:22 PM I have a feeling another 2+ million in BTC is going to be stolen.
Thoughts? Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 11, 2014, 07:31:49 PM Bitcoin price crashed after Silkroad stolen coin and FBI but after this problem bitcoin price achieved all time high :) Another silk road crash means another opportunity for ATH. Same thing I was thinking. I have watched both SR crashes effect BTC price. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 11, 2014, 07:37:57 PM source? I can't find a clear net source. Check silk road community forum. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: dserrano5 on September 11, 2014, 09:04:40 PM Another silk road crash means another opportunity for ATH. Except that the market hardly meets people expectations. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: MuttaFuttaGentleman on September 11, 2014, 11:59:02 PM Inb4 Silkroad 3.0
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: dankkk on September 12, 2014, 12:05:38 AM I would guess that it is the government attempting to determine the location of the SR servers in ways similar to how SR1's servers were found. They likely wanted to do this before SR2 would have time to implement "fixes" to avoid the same vulnerabilities as the FBI's methods were revealed recently.
From what I have read they are being DDoS'ed which is likely something similar to what the FBI did to Sr1. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: cryptworld on September 12, 2014, 12:18:13 AM How do you know is being attacked?
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: igl00 on September 12, 2014, 01:02:06 AM Inb4 Silkroad 3.0 never ending story :) Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 01:47:09 AM I would guess that it is the government attempting to determine the location of the SR servers in ways similar to how SR1's servers were found. They likely wanted to do this before SR2 would have time to implement "fixes" to avoid the same vulnerabilities as the FBI's methods were revealed recently. Yep! They say its a ddos attack but until we see the site back up with all coins intact... Starting to get old.From what I have read they are being DDoS'ed which is likely something similar to what the FBI did to Sr1. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: bornil267645 on September 12, 2014, 02:31:19 AM It's all just a part of a bigger conspiracy in my opinion.
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 03:06:38 AM "Community,
We are facing a very sophisticated DDoS attack, the most advance methods we have faced yet. The dev team is working around the clock to get marketplace service restored, as well as watch the security of our systems closely. Much of the downtime you have seen is intentional on our part: if this is an attempt to locate our servers through packet analysis, we do not want to make it easy for our adversary and would rather be offline while we adapt our defenses. We apologize for the inconvenience, thank you for your patience as we rush to remedy the situation. Defcon" Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: LouReed on September 12, 2014, 03:07:22 AM I would guess that it is the government attempting to determine the location of the SR servers in ways similar to how SR1's servers were found. They likely wanted to do this before SR2 would have time to implement "fixes" to avoid the same vulnerabilities as the FBI's methods were revealed recently. From what I have read they are being DDoS'ed which is likely something similar to what the FBI did to Sr1. They actually removed the CAPTCHA months ago. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 03:15:33 AM Posted just now!!! :D
"Community, While we continue testing different approaches to blocking the inbound DDoS, we are also processing withdrawals which were delayed by the traffic flood. We understand how important cashflow is and are prioritizing transmitting all delayed withdrawals to the network over the next four hours. Please confirm here when you receive your withdrawal. To our adversaries: You cannot stop us. We will overcome every attack. Defcon" Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: toleng on September 12, 2014, 04:18:15 AM I would guess that it is the government attempting to determine the location of the SR servers in ways similar to how SR1's servers were found. They likely wanted to do this before SR2 would have time to implement "fixes" to avoid the same vulnerabilities as the FBI's methods were revealed recently. From what I have read they are being DDoS'ed which is likely something similar to what the FBI did to Sr1. They actually removed the CAPTCHA months ago. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: counter on September 12, 2014, 05:43:45 AM I have a feeling another 2+ million in BTC is going to be stolen. Thoughts? People need to grow up and take better care of their coins. If you know there will be attacks why leave coins there. It's just going to undermine Bitcoin and you lose money on top of it so why do it. I hope your wrong and I'm over reacting because I'm ready for some good news not another circus for the media and trolls to have a beargasm with. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: bryant.coleman on September 12, 2014, 06:09:25 AM Is it really possible to steal coins from SR 2.0? They had removed the escrow system many months ago, and replaced it with the multi-sig wallet system. If SR 2.0 does not hold Bitcoins of its users anymore, how it is possible to steal the coins from that site?
Anyway, if a robbery did actually happened, then I am sure that the admins will refund the lost coins. They had already did that during the last robbery. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: Brewins on September 12, 2014, 06:41:50 AM Why do you think they will be stolen? Any vulnerability that can be used for such purpose, like the maleability stuff?
You say you have the feeling, but gave no evidence of how it might happens? Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: MrPiggles on September 12, 2014, 08:54:35 AM Is it really possible to steal coins from SR 2.0? They had removed the escrow system many months ago, and replaced it with the multi-sig wallet system. If SR 2.0 does not hold Bitcoins of its users anymore, how it is possible to steal the coins from that site? Anyway, if a robbery did actually happened, then I am sure that the admins will refund the lost coins. They had already did that during the last robbery. They havent implemented multi sig yet, it's in beta for a small number of users. Also, the original "hack" wasn't a hack. Defcon et al, realised they were playing a very dangerous game, and that the money they were making wasn't worth it. So they came up with a figure - say $3 million that they wanted for their own risk. They stole it themselves, blaming transaction malleability with some lame ass excuse about how they were moving all the money into the hot wallet just as the hacker struck (lol) Once they had their little nest eggs stashed away so they had money to disappear if the FBI came calling or they felt under threat they returned with their "sweaty and humbled" speech about how they would repay everyone, then they repay everyone with a percentage of the fees they're collecting from users. (they're probably still skimming, I bet 100% of fees are not repaying people) It makes sense, if I was them I'd do the exact same thing, rather than earn $10,000 a week or whatever knowing at any time the FBI could bust you and you'd have risked everything for a measly sum, start by stealing a good amount so you're safe then let the users repay that... Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: OmegaStarScream on September 12, 2014, 09:14:22 AM Execuse my ignorance , but what is Silkroad ? O_O :'(
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: runam0k on September 12, 2014, 09:20:16 AM Inb4 Silkroad 3.0 Or Open Bazaar or a fork thereof.Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 12:26:59 PM Why do you think they will be stolen? Any vulnerability that can be used for such purpose, like the maleability stuff? You say you have the feeling, but gave no evidence of how it might happens? I have lost more coins than you will ever own! Period. This is one response to Defcons last post... Defcon, I do not think it was appropriate of you to ignore every single vendors post confirming that all our withdrawls are not working, avoiding the issue entirely, and instead discussing something of much less importance: Market downtime. You should be responding to the half a dozen + threads in the vendor roundtable asking just what the hell is going on. Instead, you make a generic post in the public forum, ignoring all of our very serious questions. Not a very good way to show support to the people who make this place possible. Is the money safe or not? Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 12:39:32 PM 12+ hours and no response from Defcon...
Vendors are already moving to Evolution and Agora. The ship is going down!!! Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: OmegaStarScream on September 12, 2014, 12:44:35 PM Anyone please , what is this Silkroad thing ?
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: dserrano5 on September 12, 2014, 12:55:43 PM Anyone please , what is this Silkroad thing ? What were the google/ddg/wikipedia searches you tried? Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: picolo on September 12, 2014, 12:56:14 PM Execuse my ignorance , but what is Silkroad ? O_O :'( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_%28marketplace%29 How big is silkroad 2? Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hayabusa911 on September 12, 2014, 01:21:27 PM Execuse my ignorance , but what is Silkroad ? O_O :'( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_%28marketplace%29 How big is silkroad 2? FORUM STATS for the silkroad community. I would say probably less than a quarter of SR members are on the forums but who knows. 794376 Posts in 41569 Topics by 60805 Members. Latest Member: lokiau Latest Post: "Re: norway.." ( Today at 01:13:04 pm ) View the most recent posts on the forum. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: LiteCoinGuy on September 12, 2014, 03:10:01 PM i guess the police or the fbi are attacking them. but there is not only silk road 2.0 , there are more.
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: igl00 on September 13, 2014, 03:12:53 AM they cannot win this in the long term
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: Bitcoinpro on September 13, 2014, 03:30:53 AM the silk road bitcoin sold for $900 double the market value !
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: zorke on September 13, 2014, 03:57:06 AM Is it really possible to steal coins from SR 2.0? They had removed the escrow system many months ago, and replaced it with the multi-sig wallet system. If SR 2.0 does not hold Bitcoins of its users anymore, how it is possible to steal the coins from that site? Anyway, if a robbery did actually happened, then I am sure that the admins will refund the lost coins. They had already did that during the last robbery. They havent implemented multi sig yet, it's in beta for a small number of users. Also, the original "hack" wasn't a hack. Defcon et al, realised they were playing a very dangerous game, and that the money they were making wasn't worth it. So they came up with a figure - say $3 million that they wanted for their own risk. They stole it themselves, blaming transaction malleability with some lame ass excuse about how they were moving all the money into the hot wallet just as the hacker struck (lol) Once they had their little nest eggs stashed away so they had money to disappear if the FBI came calling or they felt under threat they returned with their "sweaty and humbled" speech about how they would repay everyone, then they repay everyone with a percentage of the fees they're collecting from users. (they're probably still skimming, I bet 100% of fees are not repaying people) It makes sense, if I was them I'd do the exact same thing, rather than earn $10,000 a week or whatever knowing at any time the FBI could bust you and you'd have risked everything for a measly sum, start by stealing a good amount so you're safe then let the users repay that... I do agree that the timing of the previous attack was very suspicious as it coincided with a time when the amount of money held in escrow was more or less at an all time high. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: MrPiggles on September 13, 2014, 06:02:27 AM Is it really possible to steal coins from SR 2.0? They had removed the escrow system many months ago, and replaced it with the multi-sig wallet system. If SR 2.0 does not hold Bitcoins of its users anymore, how it is possible to steal the coins from that site? Anyway, if a robbery did actually happened, then I am sure that the admins will refund the lost coins. They had already did that during the last robbery. They havent implemented multi sig yet, it's in beta for a small number of users. Also, the original "hack" wasn't a hack. Defcon et al, realised they were playing a very dangerous game, and that the money they were making wasn't worth it. So they came up with a figure - say $3 million that they wanted for their own risk. They stole it themselves, blaming transaction malleability with some lame ass excuse about how they were moving all the money into the hot wallet just as the hacker struck (lol) Once they had their little nest eggs stashed away so they had money to disappear if the FBI came calling or they felt under threat they returned with their "sweaty and humbled" speech about how they would repay everyone, then they repay everyone with a percentage of the fees they're collecting from users. (they're probably still skimming, I bet 100% of fees are not repaying people) It makes sense, if I was them I'd do the exact same thing, rather than earn $10,000 a week or whatever knowing at any time the FBI could bust you and you'd have risked everything for a measly sum, start by stealing a good amount so you're safe then let the users repay that... I do agree that the timing of the previous attack was very suspicious as it coincided with a time when the amount of money held in escrow was more or less at an all time high. because they want to continue making money. They stole their nest egg, now they're adding to it. I do not believe that it's taken so long to repay the hack, there has also been some very suspicious scams. Obvious scammers made vendors with good feedback, accounts hijacked. I genuinely believe the crew behind SR2 are running it as a long con. They both steal and scam, and run it as a real market in order to maximise their profits. They stole $3m or thereabouts. They set up people like RaulGallardo with vendor accounts, and stole tens of thousands. Quite a few weird vendors have popped up and stolen money even when vendor reg was closed...somehow. So I guess they probably steal a small proportion, I dunno, say 3% of the money going through the site. They also run it legitimately, getting 4% fees or so, but I bet they are using half of that to repay victims and half for themselves, hence why it's taken since february to repay. These guys are professional crooks, to think they're running their highly illegal darknet market in an honest way is laughable. Look what happened to the last guy who did that. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: newflesh on September 13, 2014, 10:10:32 AM You would think the FBI would have learnt its lesson from the first Silkroad takedown. Even if they were to shut down Silkroad 2, Silkroad 3 would soon pop up (I think SR2 was up within a month of SR1 being taken down), that's not even factoring in all the new developments like Open Bazaar etc.
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: zorke on September 13, 2014, 05:02:30 PM Is it really possible to steal coins from SR 2.0? They had removed the escrow system many months ago, and replaced it with the multi-sig wallet system. If SR 2.0 does not hold Bitcoins of its users anymore, how it is possible to steal the coins from that site? Anyway, if a robbery did actually happened, then I am sure that the admins will refund the lost coins. They had already did that during the last robbery. They havent implemented multi sig yet, it's in beta for a small number of users. Also, the original "hack" wasn't a hack. Defcon et al, realised they were playing a very dangerous game, and that the money they were making wasn't worth it. So they came up with a figure - say $3 million that they wanted for their own risk. They stole it themselves, blaming transaction malleability with some lame ass excuse about how they were moving all the money into the hot wallet just as the hacker struck (lol) Once they had their little nest eggs stashed away so they had money to disappear if the FBI came calling or they felt under threat they returned with their "sweaty and humbled" speech about how they would repay everyone, then they repay everyone with a percentage of the fees they're collecting from users. (they're probably still skimming, I bet 100% of fees are not repaying people) It makes sense, if I was them I'd do the exact same thing, rather than earn $10,000 a week or whatever knowing at any time the FBI could bust you and you'd have risked everything for a measly sum, start by stealing a good amount so you're safe then let the users repay that... I do agree that the timing of the previous attack was very suspicious as it coincided with a time when the amount of money held in escrow was more or less at an all time high. because they want to continue making money. They stole their nest egg, now they're adding to it. I do not believe that it's taken so long to repay the hack, there has also been some very suspicious scams. Obvious scammers made vendors with good feedback, accounts hijacked. I genuinely believe the crew behind SR2 are running it as a long con. They both steal and scam, and run it as a real market in order to maximise their profits. They stole $3m or thereabouts. They set up people like RaulGallardo with vendor accounts, and stole tens of thousands. Quite a few weird vendors have popped up and stolen money even when vendor reg was closed...somehow. So I guess they probably steal a small proportion, I dunno, say 3% of the money going through the site. They also run it legitimately, getting 4% fees or so, but I bet they are using half of that to repay victims and half for themselves, hence why it's taken since february to repay. These guys are professional crooks, to think they're running their highly illegal darknet market in an honest way is laughable. Look what happened to the last guy who did that. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: DubFX on September 13, 2014, 07:26:19 PM Ddos attack =/= beign able to steal coins, it's just making the servers too busy to respond to normal request instread of only attacker's ones.
Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: dankkk on September 13, 2014, 08:43:23 PM You would think the FBI would have learnt its lesson from the first Silkroad takedown. Even if they were to shut down Silkroad 2, Silkroad 3 would soon pop up (I think SR2 was up within a month of SR1 being taken down), that's not even factoring in all the new developments like Open Bazaar etc. It took several years for the FBI to be able to take down SR1. SR2 has been open for well under a year so far. If the FBI is able to take down SR2 in much less time then it took to take down SR1, despite SR2 learning from SR1's mistakes and apparently being much better funded from a security point of view then others would be less likely to want to follow in the footsteps of ross and create additional dark marketsTitle: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: tins on September 13, 2014, 09:00:05 PM the silk road bitcoin sold for $900 double the market value ! Do you have a link to this? I didn't know the final numbers were made public. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: wasserman99 on September 14, 2014, 06:41:31 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... I don't think any of the dark net marketplaces for illegal drugs should be considered as "safe" is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? You have a huge risk of getting scammed on these kinds of sites. Even if you do not get scammed you are breaking the law and are risking prosecution. You also risk that the site as been compromised and is now essentially run by the police/law enforcement. I would actually be surprised if the attack on SR2 was not being launched by the FBI while attempting to take it down within a year of taking down SR1. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: DubFX on September 14, 2014, 10:52:32 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: Bitcoins101 on September 14, 2014, 11:00:12 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: wasserman99 on September 14, 2014, 07:12:36 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: DubFX on September 14, 2014, 07:14:14 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: hl5460 on September 15, 2014, 08:14:19 AM Interesting news, translated and posted into Chinese:
http://8btc.com/thread-7310-1-1.html Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: DubFX on September 15, 2014, 08:25:41 AM Interesting news, translated and posted into Chinese: And what was this good for? I've heard that the ddos have stopped already, haven't it?http://8btc.com/thread-7310-1-1.html Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: wasserman99 on September 17, 2014, 01:45:09 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: freedomno1 on September 17, 2014, 01:58:50 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: snappa4ever on September 17, 2014, 03:19:06 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: zorke on September 18, 2014, 03:21:52 AM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: picolo on September 25, 2014, 02:08:35 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. It depends what you search, searching and reading some articles are illegal and anyway do you want to see the police knocking at your door? On the other hand if you use Tor, the police could know and go knock at your door thinking you are doing something illegal Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: DubFX on September 25, 2014, 02:11:50 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. It depends what you search, searching and reading some articles are illegal and anyway do you want to see the police knocking at your door? On the other hand if you use Tor, the police could know and go knock at your door thinking you are doing something illegal Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: LouReed on September 25, 2014, 02:23:54 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? http://www.deepdotweb.com/2013/10/28/updated-llist-of-hidden-marketplaces-tor-i2p/ Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack.... Post by: lucasjkr on September 27, 2014, 07:14:40 PM Rubbish!
I never have and never will bought anything from silkroad or any other "dark net" marketplace. I do find the whole phenomenon fascnating, however, so I've read and will continue to read about them. And when I do, I do so over my ordinary internet connection, knowing that the police will NEVER show up at my door because I happened to google "silkroad news", "ross ulbrict" or anything else. Take off the tinfoil hats, everyone! Title: Re: Silkroad 2.0 under attack....again Post by: TRex95 on September 27, 2014, 07:30:44 PM i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. i was under the impression that agora etc were all dangerous phishing sites... There are lots of articles on clearnet, look around ;)is there an updated list of 'safe' dark marketplaces? But ordering substances that are forbidden in your contry is illegal. To say that you should not read about sites like SR is like saying that you should not read about a murder in your community or about a bank robbery. Reading about any of these would not implicate you in anything illegal I guess the main point would be to be careful to make sure they aren't already looking at you in the first place or they would just have more circumstantial evidence to take someone down with. It depends what you search, searching and reading some articles are illegal and anyway do you want to see the police knocking at your door? On the other hand if you use Tor, the police could know and go knock at your door thinking you are doing something illegal |