Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 06:01:42 PM



Title: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 06:01:42 PM
The Shadow community voiced concerns about blocknet and the SDC dev team listened and pulled out of it. Shadow has yet to see a major pump despite all of the innovations developed there. If anyone is looking for a project to recoup their losses come check out Shadow. Zero knowledge will be live on the testnet very soon and will be another first for crypto. The first zero knowledge crytpocurrency will have a legendary rise, it might even be on par with Bitcoin. Shadow's zero knowledge update will be the single biggest advancement in cryptocurrency history outside of the development of Satoshi's Bitcoin. SDC devs are just wrapping up documentation for it. You won't have any issues with pre-mine or dev dumping at Shadow either.

The idea for a zero knowledge cryptocurrency was called out by the cypherpunk prophet Tim Mays in 1992:

"The technology for this revolution--and it surely will be both a social and economic revolution--has existed in theory for the past decade. The methods are based upon public-key encryption, zero-knowledge interactive proof systems, and various software protocols for interaction, authentication, and verification." - Tim Mays 1992

http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html

The days of of Tim Mays prophecy is upon us. Shadow will deliver what has been 24 years in the making. Make sure you're apart of history.  8)

~Coolstoryteller

Btw Shadow devs were first to uniquely implement Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.
First pos lite wallet..ever!
First full release mobile pos staking wallets ever! (optimised to not drain battery)
First html5 ui ever!
First encrypted message system to utilise html5 potential including rendering gifs and weblinks.

You may not like that its market is low volume but thats because its pure and the devs have not done a deal with the devil..it is how most pure and decent startups start it is how apple started and bitcoin!
so i hope to see you all maturely converse about this because you either are going to be apart of history or you will be to ignorant to notice :)


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 30, 2014, 06:03:27 PM
The Shadow community voiced concerns about blocknet and the SDC dev team listened and pulled out of it. Shadow has yet to see a major pump despite all of the innovations developed there. If anyone is looking for a project to recoup their losses come check out Shadow. Zero knowledge will be live on the testnet very soon and will be another first for crypto. The first zero knowledge crytpocurrency will have a legendary rise, it might even be on par with Bitcoin. Shadow's zero knowledge update will be the single biggest advancement in cryptocurrency history outside of the development of Satoshi's Bitcoin. SDC devs are just wrapping up documentation for it. You won't have any issues with pre-mine or dev dumping at Shadow either.

The idea for a zero knowledge cryptocurrency was called out by the cypherpunk prophet Tim Mays in 1992:

"The technology for this revolution--and it surely will be both a social and economic revolution--has existed in theory for the past decade. The methods are based upon public-key encryption, zero-knowledge interactive proof systems, and various software protocols for interaction, authentication, and verification." - Tim Mays 1992

http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html

The days of of Tim Mays prophecy is upon us. Shadow will deliver what has been 24 years in the making. Make sure you're apart of history.  8)

The Manifesto is really prophetic:

The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto
Timothy C. May <tcmay@netcom.com>

"A specter is haunting the modern world, the specter of crypto anarchy.

Computer technology is on the verge of providing the ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other in a totally anonymous manner. Two persons may exchange messages, conduct business, and negotiate electronic contracts without ever knowing the True Name, or legal identity, of the other. Interactions over networks will be untraceable, via extensive re- routing of encrypted packets and tamper-proof boxes which implement cryptographic protocols with nearly perfect assurance against any tampering. Reputations will be of central importance, far more important in dealings than even the credit ratings of today. These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation, the ability to tax and control economic interactions, the ability to keep information secret, and will even alter the nature of trust and reputation.

The technology for this revolution--and it surely will be both a social and economic revolution--has existed in theory for the past decade. The methods are based upon public-key encryption, zero-knowledge interactive proof systems, and various software protocols for interaction, authentication, and verification. The focus has until now been on academic conferences in Europe and the U.S., conferences monitored closely by the National Security Agency. But only recently have computer networks and personal computers attained sufficient speed to make the ideas practically realizable. And the next ten years will bring enough additional speed to make the ideas economically feasible and essentially unstoppable. High-speed networks, ISDN, tamper-proof boxes, smart cards, satellites, Ku-band transmitters, multi-MIPS personal computers, and encryption chips now under development will be some of the enabling technologies.

The State will of course try to slow or halt the spread of this technology, citing national security concerns, use of the technology by drug dealers and tax evaders, and fears of societal disintegration. Many of these concerns will be valid; crypto anarchy will allow national secrets to be trade freely and will allow illicit and stolen materials to be traded. An anonymous computerized market will even make possible abhorrent markets for assassinations and extortion. Various criminal and foreign elements will be active users of CryptoNet. But this will not halt the spread of crypto anarchy.

Just as the technology of printing altered and reduced the power of medieval guilds and the social power structure, so too will cryptologic methods fundamentally alter the nature of corporations and of government interference in economic transactions. Combined with emerging information markets, crypto anarchy will create a liquid market for any and all material which can be put into words and pictures. And just as a seemingly minor invention like barbed wire made possible the fencing-off of vast ranches and farms, thus altering forever the concepts of land and property rights in the frontier West, so too will the seemingly minor discovery out of an arcane branch of mathematics come to be the wire clippers which dismantle the barbed wire around intellectual property.

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!"


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 30, 2014, 06:13:59 PM
I do not approve of this thread.

Let them miss out on this tech. If they don't have their eyes open already, why should we show them where to look?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 30, 2014, 06:17:11 PM
I wouldn't buy Shadow if it were the last crypto on the planet because of the people that are involved in it. No thanks!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 06:17:48 PM
I do not approve of this thread.

Let them miss out on this tech. If they don't have their eyes open already, why should we show them where to look?
Noted!
I personally would like everyone to use and support a good product/project. I believe hiding everything is why the world is where its at right now. We have had the choices made for us and the tools stripped from us. Ones that help us to decide what is good or bad. So i believe by showing people, we allow people to make their own decisions but hiding it helps no one!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 06:22:55 PM
I wouldn't buy Shadow if it were the last crypto on the planet because of the people that are involved in it. No thanks!

No prob, i don't think anyone is asking you to buy it. But only accept that its the best project to date and to keep an eye out for its next industry first. Its next one is a major milestone, not only in the bitcoin world but cryptograhy in general! Zero knowledge will change the way we interact with the Internet as we know it..i encourage you to take a look at it!. The people within it are real and are extremely mature and talented.
It would only take you five minutes to look at its current features and time line that has been achieved in to see its by far a contrast to most projects to date, that also includes bitcoin!

I believe it compliments this industry and will outshine and or set a higher bar for anything coming in the next few years..very exiting.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 30, 2014, 06:25:39 PM
You guys are the ones that go around fudding all the coins right? You have a bunch of Drama Queens in your coin. Maybe when they cash out, Ill take a look. I hear you support those guys.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 30, 2014, 06:28:13 PM
I wouldn't buy Shadow if it were the last crypto on the planet because of the people that are involved in it. No thanks!

By the looks of your post history you're a BitSwift investor (BobSurplus) coin and a backer of BlockNet. Sorry there aren't any pump groups involved in Shadow, just people who believe in the concept of anonymous cryptocurrency. So you'll invest in a known pump coin backed by a known scam artist (BobSurplus) yet won't invest in Shadow a coin with real developers and investors.

BobSurplus: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom/1324-lexington-avenue-286-new-york-10128/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom-robert-bradley-bob-duskes-robert-bradley-duskes-used-to-646481

BitSwift Dev: https://twitter.com/Coinada

http://www.ratemyfunnypictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Seems-Legit.jpg


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 30, 2014, 06:32:14 PM
You guys are the ones that go around fudding all the coins right? You have a bunch of Drama Queens in your coin. Maybe when they cash out, Ill take a look. I hear you support those guys.

Do your homework before you throw around words like FUD:

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/stealthcoin-shadowcash-chandran-signatures-bitcoin-wizards-what-really-happened-and-why-there-is-a-reason-for-concern


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 30, 2014, 06:36:50 PM
Im not in Blocknet. I remember back in the cloak days you guys were fudding then too. If its for good reason ,, then fine but you guys fud the competition to help your coin. Remember when you were the PR guy for cloak and you guys were fudding Dark? Stop that crap.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 30, 2014, 06:38:24 PM
I wouldn't buy Shadow if it were the last crypto on the planet because of the people that are involved in it. No thanks!

It's an anonymity program focused on decentralization. What did you expect? Everyone to be proper gents high fiving each other and stroking cocks?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 30, 2014, 06:41:30 PM
Im not in Blocknet. I remember back in the cloak days you guys were fudding then too. If its for good reason ,, then fine but you guys fud the competition to help your coin. Remember when you were the PR guy for cloak and you guys were fudding Dark? Stop that crap.

Don't come in here and make up nonsense because that's the definition of FUD. FUD is fear, uncertainty, and doubt. A term used loosely by people like yourself who don't understand the meaning of it. Responding to a post made in the DRK thread does not classify it as FUD, nor does it make it an attack against the DRK project as a whole. I was one of the first DRK miners and was a long term DRK holder I have every right to post in the DRK thread whenever I see fit.

The only crap you need to stop is your mindless trolling. This thread is about making history 24 years after Tim May posted his Manifesto. It has nothing to do with your opinion and nothing to do with Cloak, Darkcoin or any other coin for that matter. Come back when you have something constructive and positive to say about the Shadow developers efforts towards zero knowledge.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 30, 2014, 08:22:36 PM
Im just saying shadow might have done well but I think its the negativity and drama seeking from you and pookie that has kept people away. I even saw your fud team featured on cryptocoinnews lol. You have like what 5 btc volume a day? You chased away all your customers.

TROLLS ROYCE aka "Coolstoryteller", you were on the Cloak dev team as the head PR guy. That was the biggest crock of shit in crypto. All vapor ware. Why should I listen to you now? After you told us POSA was for real and breakthrough anonymous technology, now you want us to believe this? Read the boy who cried wolf. Your word means nothing. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice......

You and Pookie own the majority of the coins. You just want to unload your bags.

Bash Bob all you want, I don't care. lol Im not Bob. You used Bob as a scapegoat for cloak failing but it had nothing to do with him. I know this because I was a cloak investor from beginning to the bitter end. I saw what happened for myself.


https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/stealthcoin-price-plummets-amid-overt-community-chaos/

"Analysis: The Stealthcoin price decline is a classic case of community FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) caused by investors with shaky hands and coin rivalries. Despite frequent developer protests, many altcoin holders spam the threads for other altcoins to try to disparage the coins and increase the standing of their own coin (and by extension their own investments). The current feud primarily involves ShadowCash trolls, another privacy-centric altcoin competing for the same investors as Stealthcoin (ShadowCash developer Rynomster has admonished the trolls for their actions). At present, the Stealthcoin thread on BitcoinTalk is in chaos. Only time will tell if investors double down on their Stealthcoin investments or jump ship for another coin."





Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 08:44:35 PM
Im just saying shadow might have done well but I think its the negativity and drama seeking from you and pookie that has kept people away. I even saw your fud team featured on cryptocoinnews lol. You have like what 5 btc volume a day? You chased away all your customers.

TROLLS ROYCE aka "Coolstoryteller", you were on the Cloak dev team as the head PR guy. That was the biggest crock of shit in crypto. All vapor ware. Why should I listen to you now? After you told us POSA was for real and breakthrough anonymous technology, now you want us to believe this? Read the boy who cried wolf. Your word means nothing. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice......

You and Pookie own the majority of the coins. You just want to unload your bags.


https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/stealthcoin-price-plummets-amid-overt-community-chaos/

"Analysis: The Stealthcoin price decline is a classic case of community FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) caused by investors with shaky hands and coin rivalries. Despite frequent developer protests, many altcoin holders spam the threads for other altcoins to try to disparage the coins and increase the standing of their own coin (and by extension their own investments). The current feud primarily involves ShadowCash trolls, another privacy-centric altcoin competing for the same investors as Stealthcoin (ShadowCash developer Rynomster has admonished the trolls for their actions). At present, the Stealthcoin thread on BitcoinTalk is in chaos. Only time will tell if investors double down on their Stealthcoin investments or jump ship for another coin."




Fud is a shitty word used by idiots.

Everything brought up to the toxic xst community and its dev was real and it actually helped the dev. But because the majority of this community now is mostly a pack of idiots who attack anyone who have any questions they don't understand or bring up bugs they feel will hurt their precocious market. They do this because a lot of these projects are crap and were just pumps to begin with.. I mean thats why everyone is hanging around like fiens in the first place! They wouldn't keep pumping these coins if they weren't removing the btc from your pockets!

You may get some gains but thats how it works you are allowed to then pump the next coin with them slowly but surely removing all your money from you until you are all killing each other and none of you're left!

That is why you bring up shitty arguments like it actually even matters to anyone with half a brain. You are killing yourselves with garbage, desperate, misguided realities!
xst community did all that to themselves by the way they treated critical analyisis.
Lets be clear on that first because bringing it up as an argument. It's extremely stupid, as is linking to that pathetic site of lies in the first place. Don't you know?

No one is scared away at all and you are dragging up immaterial rubish to attack someone and blame it on Shadow! cmon!?

Shadow project is by far the best project out there. It has not done a deal with a pump crew and its market will grow organically and sustain whatever heights it gets. It wont fall later because of all the dark dirty secretes and failures these other projects seem to be filled with because they got taken over by criminals! Some even, may have started out with good intent but then money poisoned them!

Shadow core dev team are extremely talented, modest, extremely protect and funded. This is not a game for most of us nor is it to the core dev team. They are just pumping out industry firsts. They have and will continue to blow everyone away with their tech. Its tech is being used already in most of the shitcoins you waste your money on right now. It will be no different then using bitcoin code one day either!

See, a wise man once taught me, if you are getting into a pump on the way up its already to late to have made BIG profit.. You should be getting in on the bottom Thats the art!. Most of you are buy high sell low then do desperate things to recoup totally losing all integrity you ever had to begin with and never ever learning how to trade properly at all! Riding pumps is an art, granted. But its just one side of trading what needs to be complimented with proper technical research of what it is you are investing in the first place and or what the new tech that is emerging is doing.. Thats where you make millions and not a few hundred dollars here and there!

Shadow has better tech then any project here it has made more relevant firsts then any project here and will continue to do it long after you have move on. This is about our future not about some 10% profit you want to take from some shitcoins and risk losing much more!

Take a look at it.. You cant deny it and don't start up again about how you think from some stories you have heard, from some shitheads who are desperate to keep the scamcoin they love running so they can get out safley. Has any impact on its future at all!

Its heavy displacement tech and its like teflon to fools! It has and will continue to set a high standard not only for its tech but its community who do not fill its ANN thread with bs memes and big red letters containing price speculation. It doesn't need to because it has nothing to hide and its ANN thread is an approachable environment, one that you can easily sift through to get some good info from!
ZK is going to change a lot of things most notably one day it may just change the way you think and interact with the Internet and no foll can take that away form it or the world!



Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 30, 2014, 09:06:11 PM
Im just saying shadow might have done well but I think its the negativity and drama seeking from you and pookie that has kept people away. I even saw your fud team featured on cryptocoinnews lol. You have like what 5 btc volume a day? You chased away all your customers.

TROLLS ROYCE aka "Coolstoryteller", you were on the Cloak dev team as the head PR guy. That was the biggest crock of shit in crypto. All vapor ware. Why should I listen to you now? After you told us POSA was for real and breakthrough anonymous technology, now you want us to believe this? Read the boy who cried wolf. Your word means nothing. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice......

You and Pookie own the majority of the coins. You just want to unload your bags.


https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/stealthcoin-price-plummets-amid-overt-community-chaos/

"Analysis: The Stealthcoin price decline is a classic case of community FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) caused by investors with shaky hands and coin rivalries. Despite frequent developer protests, many altcoin holders spam the threads for other altcoins to try to disparage the coins and increase the standing of their own coin (and by extension their own investments). The current feud primarily involves ShadowCash trolls, another privacy-centric altcoin competing for the same investors as Stealthcoin (ShadowCash developer Rynomster has admonished the trolls for their actions). At present, the Stealthcoin thread on BitcoinTalk is in chaos. Only time will tell if investors double down on their Stealthcoin investments or jump ship for another coin."




Fud is a shitty word used by idiots.

Everything brought up to the toxic xst community and its dev was real and it actually helped the dev. But because the majority of this community now is mostly a pack of idiots who attack anyone who have any questions they don't understand or bring up bugs they feel will hurt their precocious market. They do this because a lot of these projects are crap and were just pumps to begin with.. I mean thats why everyone is hanging around like fiens in the first place! They wouldn't keep pumping these coins if they weren't removing the btc from your pockets!

You may get some gains but thats how it works you are allowed to then pump the next coin with them slowly but surely removing all your money from you until you are all killing each other and none of you're left!

That is why you bring up shitty arguments like it actually even matters to anyone with half a brain. You are killing yourselves with garbage, desperate, misguided realities!
xst community did all that to themselves by the way they treated critical analyisis.
Lets be clear on that first because bringing it up as an argument is't extremely stupid as is linking to that pathetic site of lies in the first place. Don't you know?

No one is scared away at all and you are dragging up immaterial rubish to attack someone and blame it on Shadow! cmon!?

Shadow project is by far the best project out there. It has not done a deal with a pump crew and its market will grow organically and sustain whatever heights it gets. It wont fall later because of all the dark dirty secretes and failures these other projects seem to be filled with because they got taken over by criminals! some even may have started out with good intent but then money poisoned them!
Shadow core dev team are extremely talented, modest, extremely protect and funded. This is not a game for most of us nor is it to the core dev team they are just pumping out industry firsts, they have and will continue to blow everyone away with their tech. Its tech is being used already in most of the shitcoins you waste your money on right now. It will be no different then using bitcoin code one day either!

See a wise man once taught me, if you are getting into a pump on the way up its already to late to have made big profit.. You should be getting in on the bottom. Most of you are buy high sell low then do desperate things to recoup totally losing all integrity you ever had to begin with!

Shadow has better tech then any project here it has made more relevant firsts then any project here and will continue to do it long after you have move on. This is about our future not about some 10% profit you want to take from some shitcoins and risk losing much more!

Take a look at it.. You cant deny it and don't start up again about how you think from some stories you have heard, from some shitheads who are desperate to keep the scamcoin they love running so they can get out safley. Has any impact on its future at all!

Its heavy displacement tech and its like teflon to fools! It has and will continue to set a high standard not only for its tech but its community who do not fill its ANN thread with bs memes and big red letters containing price speculation. It doesn't need to because it has nothing to hide and its ANN thread is an approachable environment, one that you can easily sift through to get some good info from!
ZK is going to change a lot of things most notably one day it may just change the way you think and interact with the Internet and no foll can take that away form it or the world!

You seem like a good guy. Thanks for taking the time to respond. You need to figure out a way to get them out or put a cork in them. Ive looked through your thread and know a good bit about shadow. I would have been a potential investor but all that crap scared me away. Its not about pointing out potential flaws. That is a good thing. You and I both know if there is something flawed, it can be worked on and fixed. Its the way they spam the forums and try to bash coins that gets under my skin. Don't let them make decisions for you. Those guys are not the ones you want to be listening to. Again thanks for responding and sorry if I hijacked your thread but "those guys" just started same negative crap with me just now. I should have bitten my tongue but too late and I apologize. Good luck!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 30, 2014, 09:16:57 PM
Not at all worried about your comments its good conversation if all the rubbish is left out. We can talk humanly about all the real comparisons because at the end of the day we are all in it for various reasons but one most notably that we can all relate to. Is we don't want to be scammed. But we all are in many ways i just would like to expose that and possibly introduce a new chance to start and support something that is not blemished by the core issues most projects face today.

To be honest though its all up to you, we can either continue with the drama and miss the whole point of this tech and condone the chains that people are putting on its progress. Or we can stop with the junk drama and mud throwing and just look at it as our future and learn to bet on something that is going to change the way we think about anon currency and interact on the Internet!

There is a reason Shadow does not wish to be distracted by blocknets and all the other gimmicks and most just need to take a look to see why!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 30, 2014, 11:55:14 PM
snip

Don't make claims based on information Bob fed to you via his anus. Actually, it sounds like you're one of Bob's alt accounts or in his group from a post I saw in the other thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=836324.msg9347573#msg9347573). No idiot is that stupid to believe Bob or anyone in his group for that matter.

I was never on the Cloak dev team I was helping out with the coin's community like anyone else. When I found out that the devs couldn't deliver I called Cloak out for being vapor on IRC and the forum and it got dismissed by the majority Cloak community as a FUD. Meanwhile they labeled me a ship jumper instead of facing the truth. What were you doing at that time?

The fact that you are regurgitating Bob's bullshit speaks volumes about who you really are and your motives here in this thread. Bob is on record saying that he owned 20+ % of LXC and when he was called out he decided to make up a bullshit rumor on an alt account that myself and Pookie owned a similar share in Shadow. A rumor that dipshits like yourself keep repeating.

Too bitchmade to use his own account to make his baseless accusation, kinda like you. Fact is I'm still here and no matter what bullshit of Bob's you try to throw at Shadow the tech will shine through it.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 01:13:01 AM
I was in the cloak irc with you trolls. What are you talking about? I was in there everyday lol You are talking out your ass. You are saying you weren't the head PR guy? The guy that made the cloak website(forum)? Bob wasn't in the cloak irc as far as I know. I don't know what happened with you two back then but don't drag me into it.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 31, 2014, 01:18:26 AM
I was in the cloak irc with you trolls. What are you talking about? I was in there everyday lol You are talking out your ass. You are saying you weren't the head PR guy? The guy that made the cloak website?

He made the forum, and ran a PR/marketing donation wallet. That's all.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 01:20:24 AM
I talked to trolls all the time back then. I know who he is lol


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 31, 2014, 01:21:16 AM
I talked to trolls all the time back then. I know who he is lol

Do you know who I am?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 01:23:02 AM
I don't know this name. But I knew most of the people that were in there. Theoretical gave some awesome chart reading lessons lol Dark Proton too. I loved all those guys. Great times. Don't try to fud me now lol What is up with that?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 01:24:14 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 01:35:30 AM
http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-go-get-laid-3.png


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 01:38:45 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 31, 2014, 01:44:10 AM
I don't know this name. But I knew most of the people that were in there. Theoretical gave some awesome chart reading lessons lol Dark Proton too. I loved all those guys. Great times. Don't try to fud me now lol What is up with that?

What was your alias?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 31, 2014, 01:49:31 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?

Lol... Shall we take a look at the coins called by SDC members and the coins called by known pump and dumpers (blackhand group, bobsurplus,  pr0m, fontas, theblonde, iconic expert)?



Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: BitcoiNaked on October 31, 2014, 01:51:25 AM
Shadowcash, isn't it's dev the same as that scam coin called blackcoin?


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 01:53:19 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

See you just made my point for me. There you go again with the drama. I don't own xc halcyon blocknet stealth or any of those. I didn't know XC made hal but who cares? Whats the point that he had a pump group? Ask Trolls about Cloak TNAX. If you put half the energy into your coin as you do fud,, you would be a lot further ahead. I don't believe everything I read and because you guys do it so often I don't think anyone else does either. This isn't middle school. Grow the fuck up.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 02:00:20 AM
Im done with this shit. Good luck with your crap coin and have fun with the drama.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 02:02:33 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

See you just made my point for me. There you go again with the drama. I don't own xc halcyon blocknet stealth or any of those. I didn't know XC made hal but who cares? Whats the point that he had a pump group? Ask Trolls about Cloak TNAX. If you put half the energy into your coin as you do fud,, you would be a lot further ahead. I don't believe everything I read and because you guys do it so often I don't think anyone else does either. This isn't middle school. Grow the fuck up.

I don't even know how to answer that. manic much? All i'll say is "You'll see!"


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: jwinterm on October 31, 2014, 02:07:35 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: vizique on October 31, 2014, 02:20:07 AM
Shadowcash, isn't it's dev the same as that scam coin called blackcoin?

Ah yes, always one that has to drag BC into it LOL ;)

And I'm pretty certain rat4 isn't Ryno... but then you don't actually care either way do you? :P

BlackCoin is doing fine and working hard.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 02:20:56 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

ShadowCashs stealth addresses are uniquely implemented dual-key stealth addresses to be layered with zk-snarks!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 02:27:40 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Hey jwinterm,

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first C++ in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT wallet. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

To everyone else:

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: jwinterm on October 31, 2014, 02:33:57 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 02:59:04 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.

I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

"1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff."

Where in that did you ask for a short explanation..thats right you didn't you asked for papers and everything.. I'm telling you and anyone else who is reading this if you knew anything about what you were talking about you would know that what you're asking for is as complicated to write as writing the code itself! give it time or gtfo imo! You were told you would have an explanation soon. All i saw was rubbish in your post it was really hard to remove the loaded junk assumptions but i'm glad you asked for what you did because it is something everyone needs to see! but just be bloody patient! Shadow did not invent you're certainly right but they implemented it and open sourced it! most of you muppets are way to lost in all this drama bullshit to even see a proper project when you see one! Be grateful and contribute without your arrogance or gtfo in my opinion!
and now you are calling the project rubbish..Sorry but you are a fool right and thats why im being rude. If it was not you i suggest you also be patient and understand what it all means!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 02:59:56 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.

I am a firm believe that Zero Knowledge will never exist, or if it does release, it wont actually be true Zero Knowledge.  Its already been delayed, and it will get delayed again. Why do you think all these SDC trolls are out and about fudding all the other coins, because there is no progress being done with their coin so to consume their leisure time, they choose to blow up other communities. Stay away from SDC and their scumbag community


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:05:58 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.

I am a firm believe that Zero Knowledge will never exist, or if it does release, it wont actually be true Zero Knowledge.  Its already been delayed, and it will get delayed again. Why do you think all these SDC trolls are out and about fudding all the other coins, because there is no progress being done with their coin so to consume their leisure time, they choose to blow up other communities. Stay away from SDC and their scumbag community

Delayed? how? I don't remember anyone giving a firm date.. This is cutting edge tech here. There is no date it needs to be done by. It was not a contracted job paid by you so all you are doing is bringing up something immaterial to attack the projects integrity with..what a fool!

I don't need you to believe its happening i need you to wake up and stop throwing the same old shit everyone else does at this project! Because all i see is a bunch of fools trying to bash a coin thats not trying to get you to buy it but not saying anything on the coin forums that are blatant scams!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 03:09:50 AM
Snip

That opinion is based on speculation from someone who hasn't read up on zero knowledge since 2011 (as claimed in his post). Note the reply comment after his post.

The comment is based on the assumption that zero knowledge is too young to be implemented into a cryptocurrency (the concept was first formed in 1985). That comment alone makes clear the commenter has no concept of applied cryptography. The entire concept is based on creating a scheme and putting it out for testing to break and fix it. Bitcoin is a prime example of this. Satoshi released it into the wild and since then there has been numerous fixes to the overall protocol as a result it is much stronger than it was in 2009. So, I'd love to know where the logic from that stems.

The commenter also makes the statement that a 17 year old could break it (which can be applied to anything). Again speculative at best.

What we have here is the commenter, which may or may not be you - coming to the conclusion that Shadow's developers don't possess the technical skillset to implement an advanced cryptographic primitive like zero knowledge into a cryptocurrency. For the last 2+ months the developers have been working to perfect and release it. You may call it bullshit I call it progress. One thing to note is that the commenter makes the claim that Shadow's devs could be the smartest developers currently working on cryptocurrency soon we will find out if that's true.

I'm not here to speculate with you, rather, I'll be the first one to invite you to the testing and personally watch you eat your own shoes.

Quick run through:

Coinjoin = Greg Maxwell
Cryptonote = Anon bytecoin devs
Zerocoin = ZC devs
Zerocash = ZC devs
ShadowSend = Shadow Developers
ShadowSend V2 = Shadow Developers

Above we have the leading pioneers in the privacy vertical. These developers invented their own anonymity protocols, rather than search and replace code. Their work has spawned countless clones who use their technology. Hard work vs the easy way out (forking). Instead of degrade their efforts why not contribute or create your own solution that is superior. Too many armchair developers in crypto quick to criticize when they don't have any work themselves.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 03:09:53 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.

I am a firm believe that Zero Knowledge will never exist, or if it does release, it wont actually be true Zero Knowledge.  Its already been delayed, and it will get delayed again. Why do you think all these SDC trolls are out and about fudding all the other coins, because there is no progress being done with their coin so to consume their leisure time, they choose to blow up other communities. Stay away from SDC and their scumbag community

Delayed? how? I don't remember anyone giving a firm date.. This is cutting edge tech here. There is no date it needs to be done by. It was not a contracted job paid by you so all you are doing is bringing up something immaterial to attack the projects integrity with..what a fool!

I don't need you to believe its happening i need you to wake up and stop throwing the same old shit everyone else does at this project! Because all i see is a bunch of fools trying to bash a coin thats not trying to get you to buy it but not saying anything on the coin forums that are blatant scams!

september was supprosed to be the initial release. It is now November basically.... That is delayed

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BwGZkikCYAA4Eut.png


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 03:17:00 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:19:50 AM

Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses added by mostly every anon coin to date.


I'm not going to argue about the dramatic bullshit, but the above statement made by OP is clearly false, unless Peter Todd and/or the bytecoin developers are working on shadowcash, which I'm pretty sure is not the case.

Here's a link to an article from January crediting Peter Todd for bringing the concept to bitcoin: http://www.coindesk.com/stealth-addresses-secret-bitcoin-privacy/

Also, bytecoin used stealth addresses in conjunction with ring signatures since late last year (2013) in a non-bitcoin clone, or two years before that if you believe the hype.

Vertcoin was the first altcoin to implement stealth addresses in the core qt-wallet of any altcoin based on the btc codebase, before shadowcoin existed, and execoin also implemented them in an electrum based wallet I think before shadowcash existed.

So who invented stealth addresses on the shadowcash team and when? ???

Shadow did not invent Stealth Addresses. No where did the SDC dev team claimed to have done so. Vertcoin's stealth addresses were closed source.

Shadow did implement the first in-protocol dual key stealth addresses. In fact you can use it in the daemon cmd "sendtostealthaddress" you don't need a QT. The influx of coins with Stealth Addresses is a direct result of Shadow open sourcing it and has nothing to do with Vertcoin.

This thread is to highlight a major advancement in cryptocurrency (zero knowledge) not mindless bash the efforts made at Shadow. But hey this is Bitcointalk and people could care less about advancements and more about trolling.

I quoted the OP who said "Btw Shadow devs invented Stealthaddresses..."

Here's a more detailed deconstruction of your bullshit from reddit than I can provide (that you guys failed to give any sort of technical response to):
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2k6yu4/shadowcash_introduces_shadowsend_v2_featuring/clinbzk

Quote
I did. And you are correct, Monero is not zero-knowledge. But I contend that the shadow developers (probably) do not actually have any zero-knowledge technology.

I have some purely a priori logical reasoning, and I also have some experience from the field of mathematics under my belt to support my conjecture. First: if ring signatures work the way everyone in the mathematical community thinks they should, then why bother implementing zero-knowledge proofs? Easy answer: ring sigs aren't zero-knowledge, and are simply highly resistant to blockchain analysis, not immune to blockchain analysis. ZK would still be better to use, after all, even if ring sig technology works the way it's supposed to, unless the costs/constraints to using ZK tech overwhelms the benefits.

Second: if they have ZK technology that actually works, with more advantages than disadvantages, why bother implementing ring sigs? Ring sigs are huge compared to normal digital signatures, complicated in terms of implementation as a developer, and cause a big UTXO-set bloat. If you have ZK tech, ring sigs are not just a waste of time and money to implement, it's a waste of space on the network.

Ok, so maybe these developers are using a Zerocash-style[1] system in which the basecoins are ring-signature based (already obfuscating the block chain). What happens? Size and speed of the protocol explode and all of a sudden we have a massive blockchain and a super slow network. Conclusion: Shadow doesn't have ZK tech under their belt, they are simply going to implement ring sigs and walk away while chuckling.

So, that's my a priori reasoning. Here's the experience from mathematics that supports my conjecture: ZK tech is the holy grail of cryptocurrency, Zerocash[2] is pretty much the only place you'll find a decent protocol. And, as I said, in Zerocash, you still have two types of currency, the basecoin and the zerocoin; if the basecoin choice is a ring-sig based coin, Zerocash is going to blow up in size and speed to the point where it's no longer useful. Anyone trying to sell ZK to you right now is probably scamming you because efficient, secure algorithms that work in a robust, general setting do not yet really exist. But I could be wrong, I could be not-so-up-to-date on non-interactive zero-knowledge algorithms. So let's pretend I'm wrong about their suitability: we still shouldn't be using ZK tech in coins, not yet.

Non-interactive ZK cryptography is currently in very young stages of the technology. The first time any sort of generality was proven to be POSSIBLE was only 2006[3] . So even if these developers have discovered some brand new math research (later than 2011[4] for example), something that is much more efficient and powerful than current technology? All that means they are still using brand-new cryptography. And that's a huge no-no if you actually want to secure your shit. Tech that's been around for 20 years like ring signatures? It's stood the test of time, it's been given a few decades for people to look for avenues of attack. On the other hand, if you pull a random paper out from The Journal of Cryptography published some time in the last year and implement it, you could have every mathematician in the world read that paper, come to the conclusion that the tech is tight and cool. And then the next week some 17 year old in their basement could crack it. Something that's been around for decades has withstood and passed that test of time. ZK proofs sound all fancy and nice, but in reality, they could be no more secure than any system upon which they are built.

Finally: let's just presume for a moment that these folks are brilliant developers who have a great zerocash-style scheme going on, or maybe even some other version of NIZK proofs that are distinct from zerocash and magically small and fast (remember, you get what you pay for in terms of size and speed when you are talking anonymity; there is a tradeoff). These brilliant folks? They are setting their network up to be secured with proof-of-stake. No amount of ZK or ring sig technology can save the coin if you can rewrite the blockchain, and proof-of-stake is mathematically insecure[5] (that link sometimes doesn't work, so just google "Andrew Poelstra Proof of Stake" the paper is a few years old but is very very good).

Look, spend your money where you want. But if you put money into ZK technology now, you are giving your money to a complete genius, a liar, or a fool. Usually fools can't make cryptocurrencies and afaik no one has really made NIZK proofs feasible for currencies yet, so these people are scamming you. Shadow is likely just another pump-n-dump. ZK tech may become feasible in a year or a decade, but the state of technology as-is? ZK is not feasible for currency transactions because it's slow and big and new.

The proof is in the pudding, bro: they won't make available any technical papers describing what zero-knowledge proofs they are actually implementing. I have a zero-knowledge rock here on my desk, it'll do everything they describe in that article, and I, also, refuse to explain how this rock works. Send me money, too, and write articles about me!

Full conclusion: either these folks are just duplicating a ring-sig based protocol like Monero's cryptonote and calling it zero-knowledge to start a pump-n-dump, or these folks are smarter than all the other developers in the world.

If a Shadow developer wants to hop on here and chat about what they are actually implementing, I'd love to hear it, ask questions, and get to the root of this. All I would like to see is 1) an explanation of why doubling up on anonymity with both ring sigs and with NIZK proofs is a good idea and 2) a few technical papers describing how they are doing what they are doing. That would undermine a huge amount of my above argument, possibly all of it except the PoS stuff.

TLDR: non-interactive zero-knowledge technology is too young of a technology to be feasible in a cryptocurrency schemes, and anyone trying to tell you different is probably scamming you.

I am a firm believe that Zero Knowledge will never exist, or if it does release, it wont actually be true Zero Knowledge.  Its already been delayed, and it will get delayed again. Why do you think all these SDC trolls are out and about fudding all the other coins, because there is no progress being done with their coin so to consume their leisure time, they choose to blow up other communities. Stay away from SDC and their scumbag community

Delayed? how? I don't remember anyone giving a firm date.. This is cutting edge tech here. There is no date it needs to be done by. It was not a contracted job paid by you so all you are doing is bringing up something immaterial to attack the projects integrity with..what a fool!

I don't need you to believe its happening i need you to wake up and stop throwing the same old shit everyone else does at this project! Because all i see is a bunch of fools trying to bash a coin thats not trying to get you to buy it but not saying anything on the coin forums that are blatant scams!

september was supprosed to be the initial release. It is now November basically.... That is delayed

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BwGZkikCYAA4Eut.png

Thats a roadmap put there by the community i've said it before its not from the core dev team and it shouldn't really be there at all to be honest! Roadmaps with dates are stupid In this game people like you get upset when they don't fall on the dates and use it against the project.. You didn't contract the work and because zk isn't released now in no way means its non existent thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard. i might understand it the markets for shadow were doing 500+ btc a day but they just arn't and its far from gone parabolic so your lame attempts are just that..got any claims with some substance? No didn't think so!

Honestly i wouldn't be so rude if there just was not so much conjecture in most of you guys posts!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 03:22:17 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

No where did shadow claim it was implementing zerocoin.. you need to do your homework before you make baseless claims. Zerocoin doesn't even use zk-snarks.. lulz. You're just an ignorant troll loves to make posts.

TrangLee sucking on BobSurplus's anus. Welcome to the thread I figured it wouldn't be long until you stuck your troll node into this thread. It's no wonder you would keep repeating lies started by BobSurplus and disregard the truth. You have no factual claims to back up your lies.

The only thing that's accurate is that you have no respect for developers efforts to advancing cryptocurrency. You spend your life on a forum going from page to page wherever Shadow is mentioned into order to degrade the work being made here. You call Shadow a scamcoin yet you have no problems with your shitcoin developers forking the code. Lovely life you live and ultimately it's the reason why you're going no where fast.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:22:59 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

Another load of garbage from a fool with nothing better to say. I bet if i dug into your past i would find all sorts of messed up things to dredge up about you but i don't care so i don't use anything i already have on you against you either! You just don't know what a decent project looks like you are so caught up in the crypto filth that you all maintain here with your shitcoins! Stealthcoin pfft what a joke you guys turned that into!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Wheatclove on October 31, 2014, 03:26:35 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 03:26:47 AM
Here is a link to a thread that highlights a lot of the SDC boys trollsroyce (coolstoryteller) pookie (Boh) and longandshort SDC fanboy/troll and outright lies as well as Nazi deleting and sanitizing anything in their official thread that might even possible threaten to tarnish thier "baby" SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0

Tell us again how Shadowcoin release the 1st pos staking Android wallet. Great story except one thing. Its a lie. Go to the Android stor and look at the post date for SDC's and LibrexCoins. Librexcoins is a full 4 days earlier. These guys even paid "news" places to make fake releases stating that SDC's was 1st. How sick?

Who would invest in a coin that attacks other coins and manipulates markets to damage their value (often at losses just to do it) and lies about its developments and fabricates News stories to support it? Stay away from this demonic coin bagholder group.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 03:28:56 AM
Here is a link to a thread that highlights a lot of the SDC boys trollsroyce (coolstoryteller) pookie (Boh) and longandshort SDC fanboy/troll and outright lies as well as Nazi deleting and sanitizing anything in their official thread that might even possible threaten to tarnish thier "baby" SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0

Tell us again how Shadowcoin release the 1st pos staking Android wallet. Great story except one thing. Its a lie. Go to the Android stor and look at the post date for SDC's and LibrexCoins. Librexcoins is a full 4 days earlier. These guys even paid "news" places to make fake releases stating that SDC's was 1st. How sick?

Who would invest in a coin that attacks other coins and manipulates markets to damage their value (often at losses just to do it) and lies about its developments and fabricates News stories to support it? Stay away from this demonic coin bagholder group.

ZzzZzZzz. TrangLee you're a pathetic shitcoin investor. Tell us again about Chandran signatures.

Again you have nothing legit to say. You come in here posting bullshit without a single piece of evidence to back up your claim outside of what BobSurplus posted. That makes you a BobSurplus groupie. LMAO

Take your shitcoin advice and head back under your bridge.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:29:20 AM
Tranglee you're sick!

cry baby? what? i wasn't going to have anything to do with the blocknet i know what darkness lies within it and the devs involved! Go on though continue bashing people to get at Shadow cause that makes sense! Honestly you people are sick and need help you're a joke to humanity. How can you honestly be so stupid and call us the fudsters, gawd you literally broke the camels back i'm out.  I'm just sick to death of trying with you lost causes! You are ruining thsi whole space and what its really meant to be working to achieve!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:30:37 AM
Here is a link to a thread that highlights a lot of the SDC boys trollsroyce (coolstoryteller) pookie (Boh) and longandshort SDC fanboy/troll and outright lies as well as Nazi deleting and sanitizing anything in their official thread that might even possible threaten to tarnish thier "baby" SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0

Tell us again how Shadowcoin release the 1st pos staking Android wallet. Great story except one thing. Its a lie. Go to the Android stor and look at the post date for SDC's and LibrexCoins. Librexcoins is a full 4 days earlier. These guys even paid "news" places to make fake releases stating that SDC's was 1st. How sick?

Who would invest in a coin that attacks other coins and manipulates markets to damage their value (often at losses just to do it) and lies about its developments and fabricates News stories to support it? Stay away from this demonic coin bagholder group.

That was a beta piece of crap that taxed your battery. Shadow released a full version, optimized to not smash your battery and oh it also actually staked! What has stealthcoin and librex released since..thats right 0
you twits don't see the patern here do you?

Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Ch andran...


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 03:32:44 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 03:34:13 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

so you own more than half the supply.....ya

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JOsUhrrxeg


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 03:36:17 AM
Here is a link to a thread that highlights a lot of the SDC boys trollsroyce (coolstoryteller) pookie (Boh) and longandshort SDC fanboy/troll and outright lies as well as Nazi deleting and sanitizing anything in their official thread that might even possible threaten to tarnish thier "baby" SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0

Tell us again how Shadowcoin release the 1st pos staking Android wallet. Great story except one thing. Its a lie. Go to the Android stor and look at the post date for SDC's and LibrexCoins. Librexcoins is a full 4 days earlier. These guys even paid "news" places to make fake releases stating that SDC's was 1st. How sick?

Who would invest in a coin that attacks other coins and manipulates markets to damage their value (often at losses just to do it) and lies about its developments and fabricates News stories to support it? Stay away from this demonic coin bagholder group.

That was a beta piece of crap that taxed your battery. Shadow released a full version, optimized to not smash your battery and oh it also actually staked! What has stealthcoin and librex released since..thats right 0
you twits don't see the patern here do you?

Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Ch andran...

ok how about zerocoins fatel flaw?  Epic fail.

Quote
ZeroCash development has stalled in recent weeks, and no coin presently incorporates a finished product, although a “ZeroCoin” team is working towards releasing a coin based on the protocol. Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data. When a Zerocoin is minted, the coin is added as a valid member by a one-way cryptographic accumulator. In order to prove later that a given Zerocoin belongs to this set, during the initial setup of the accumulator, it is necessary to define a number N that is the product of two prime numbers P and Q. The N would be defined by a third-party, in the original Zerocash scheme. Though, if the prime numbers are large enough, it would be impossible for anyone to know what N is and thus, obtain knowledge of P and Q. If a party knew what N was, they could create their own accumulator and be able to make as many Zerocoins as possible.
The problem manifests with the total number of coins in a ZeroCash network. Since the total is obscured, it is impossible to know if the person who created the coin secretly kept this data, and with it the ability to create new coins at will.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:37:34 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

Can you remind me again how much bitcoin satoshi owns? Shadow cant force people to buy it and its not saying its solved the distribution side of things as has no other coin so far! so cmon keep at it this game you are playing has been played by so many fools before you on other projects oh including bitcoin...but yeah keep it up we know you're great at working at something that will never succeed! but honestly i'm out now do your worst you make me sick..literally because you just don't have the first clue! I'm glad you left the shadow community actually you are a bit of a tossa!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 03:41:16 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

Can you remind me again how much bitcoin satoshi owns? Shadow cant force people to buy it and its not saying its solved the distribution side of things as has no other coin so far! so cmon keep at it this game you are playing has been played by so many fools before you on other projects oh including bitcoin...but yeah keep it up we know you're great at working at something that will never succeed! but honestly i'm out now do your worst you make me sick..literally because you just don't have the first clue! I'm glad you left the shadow community actually you are a bit of a tossa!

but the difference is, satoshi was never in it for the money, he wanted to build something that would change the world. Altcoin investors are purely driven by monetary gains and thus, would dump their coins if it meant earning 10 million dollars or whatever it could amount to.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:42:25 AM
Here is a link to a thread that highlights a lot of the SDC boys trollsroyce (coolstoryteller) pookie (Boh) and longandshort SDC fanboy/troll and outright lies as well as Nazi deleting and sanitizing anything in their official thread that might even possible threaten to tarnish thier "baby" SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0

Tell us again how Shadowcoin release the 1st pos staking Android wallet. Great story except one thing. Its a lie. Go to the Android stor and look at the post date for SDC's and LibrexCoins. Librexcoins is a full 4 days earlier. These guys even paid "news" places to make fake releases stating that SDC's was 1st. How sick?

Who would invest in a coin that attacks other coins and manipulates markets to damage their value (often at losses just to do it) and lies about its developments and fabricates News stories to support it? Stay away from this demonic coin bagholder group.

That was a beta piece of crap that taxed your battery. Shadow released a full version, optimized to not smash your battery and oh it also actually staked! What has stealthcoin and librex released since..thats right 0
you twits don't see the patern here do you?

Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Chandran...Ch andran...

ok how about zerocoins fatel flaw?  Epic fail.

Quote
ZeroCash development has stalled in recent weeks, and no coin presently incorporates a finished product, although a “ZeroCoin” team is working towards releasing a coin based on the protocol. Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data. When a Zerocoin is minted, the coin is added as a valid member by a one-way cryptographic accumulator. In order to prove later that a given Zerocoin belongs to this set, during the initial setup of the accumulator, it is necessary to define a number N that is the product of two prime numbers P and Q. The N would be defined by a third-party, in the original Zerocash scheme. Though, if the prime numbers are large enough, it would be impossible for anyone to know what N is and thus, obtain knowledge of P and Q. If a party knew what N was, they could create their own accumulator and be able to make as many Zerocoins as possible.
The problem manifests with the total number of coins in a ZeroCash network. Since the total is obscured, it is impossible to know if the person who created the coin secretly kept this data, and with it the ability to create new coins at will.

I cant help myself..

really should stop commenting on things you have no clue about right! you did the same with chandran and now shadows implementation of zero.. he is right there is a flaw..something we know about thats why shadow devs are using ring signatures instead of an accumulator but you would know this is you had half a fucking clue! so again the jokes on you..keep it up you might just help me enjoy this!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 03:44:23 AM
Some more Zerocoin info on Bloat. Did SDC Ryno figure all this out faster than noted phd's that created it?


Zerocoin is the most complex of the bunch. It uses a combination of digital commitments, one-way accumulators, zero-knowledge proofs, and some extensions to the existing bitcoin protocol to attain an extremely high level of anonymity. It’s difficult to translate all of this into simpler terms, but if you’re interesting in a more ‘technical’ explanation you can find it here.

Of course, such a high level of anonymity does not come without tradeoffs – zerocoin has a high amount of overhead. A zerocoin proof (344 bytes) is needed for each transaction, and stored within the blockchain for eternity. These proofs must be processed by network nodes, adding not only significant storage bloat, but computational requirements as well. Keep in mind that the average bitcoin transaction is about 400 bytes in size, so this is no small amount.

Zerocoin is not even released yet, so it could very well trim itself down before then. For reference, the first implementation used a 50kb proof… But in it’s current state, it doesn’t scale very well. It would function just fine as an altcoin, but if you were to scale the network up to bitcoin size, it’s likely too bloated for it to work. Also worth mentioning is that all the fancy math that zerocoin employs could also open the door for some sort of unforeseen exploit.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:46:29 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

Can you remind me again how much bitcoin satoshi owns? Shadow cant force people to buy it and its not saying its solved the distribution side of things as has no other coin so far! so cmon keep at it this game you are playing has been played by so many fools before you on other projects oh including bitcoin...but yeah keep it up we know you're great at working at something that will never succeed! but honestly i'm out now do your worst you make me sick..literally because you just don't have the first clue! I'm glad you left the shadow community actually you are a bit of a tossa!

but the difference is, satoshi was never in it for the money, he wanted to build something that would change the world. Altcoin investors are purely driven by monetary gains and thus, would dump their coins if it meant earning 10 million dollars or whatever it could amount to.

durrrr thats why sdc markets are the way they are...fuck you are a dumb cunt i swear. Yes i'm using foul abuse but you mate are a dead set fucking dropkick and deserver it all!

Shadow is in no way impatient nor is the community doing back room deals with stupid pump groups for a quick pump..it always fails and every one almost have all sucumbed to failure because people cant keep their mouths shut...shadow devs just work and if they were in it for money they would not be here they would be working for giants like microsoft ect etc they do it because they want to build something for their kids and help someone somewhere in the world..all you want to do is throw mud at them..shame on you! stupid stupid kid!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:47:15 AM
Some more Zerocoin info on Bloat. Did SDC Ryno figure all this out faster than noted phd's that created it?


Zerocoin is the most complex of the bunch. It uses a combination of digital commitments, one-way accumulators, zero-knowledge proofs, and some extensions to the existing bitcoin protocol to attain an extremely high level of anonymity. It’s difficult to translate all of this into simpler terms, but if you’re interesting in a more ‘technical’ explanation you can find it here.

Of course, such a high level of anonymity does not come without tradeoffs – zerocoin has a high amount of overhead. A zerocoin proof (344 bytes) is needed for each transaction, and stored within the blockchain for eternity. These proofs must be processed by network nodes, adding not only significant storage bloat, but computational requirements as well. Keep in mind that the average bitcoin transaction is about 400 bytes in size, so this is no small amount.

Zerocoin is not even released yet, so it could very well trim itself down before then. For reference, the first implementation used a 50kb proof… But in it’s current state, it doesn’t scale very well. It would function just fine as an altcoin, but if you were to scale the network up to bitcoin size, it’s likely too bloated for it to work. Also worth mentioning is that all the fancy math that zerocoin employs could also open the door for some sort of unforeseen exploit.

bloat is not an issue when you can prune the data fool..cmon got anymore bs!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 03:48:10 AM
actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

TrangLee is so dense he can't even see when people are trolling him. Take your FUD conversation back to your SDC FUD thread. Which BTW was started by the LXC dev. I'll be sure to grab a screenshot of the Skype logs for that where the LXC dev admits he is the one who started that smear thread. You're such a tool that you participated in a FUD campaign against SDC orchestrated by the LXC dev which to my knowledge has nothing to do with Stealthcoin besides being a partner in BlockNet. Baseless accusations, mindless trolling and unnecessary personal attacks = Bitcointalk community. Seems like the shitcoin communities always take it upon themselves to attack Shadow.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=383543 this is an alt account for the LXC dev "KidKrypto"


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 03:57:10 AM
More revelations from the truth box! But no!!! by all means keep attacking us and Shadow like we are to blame!

http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#0
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#1
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#3
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#5
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#6
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#7
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#8


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 03:58:43 AM
SDC is run by a few major bagholders who will kill the coin on the first opportunity they get after a pump. Why would anyone invest in this, unless they actually wanted to lose their money?
Thats not even remotely accurate. sdc is run by a mature, patient community who do not waver to such drama and rubbish like you are projecting. The truth always and i mean ALWAYS comes out..have you seen this lately?
Just one of many revelations to surface soon you can bet on it! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.0

It's very accurate. Trolls royce is a major "angel investor" the own 1.4 million coins and his friend Pookie owns more. Then there is you too. "i'm out I quite if it's in blockent" the cry baby who bag holds a fat bag too. Along with the dev almost 80% of the coin is controlled. Well If that isn't a pump and dump group. lol. The coin has no volume because these coins are not trading as they bulk are help by this guys. They would have to buy each others coin back and forth to make volume. They have test run this process a few times and got called for the manipulation. On top of all this the will buy a competitors coin on the low price and then dump all at once to crash it even at a loss and also send in alts and trolls to fud the coin at that moment to make it look like the fud is real. Everyone who reads these forums regularly know that these guys do this.


Has ShadowCoin/Cash/whatever its called now figured out the massive blaot and stall that comes with zerocoin (zk-snarks)? There is a reason the Zerocoin/cash team still hasnt released a working coin.

actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

Can you remind me again how much bitcoin satoshi owns? Shadow cant force people to buy it and its not saying its solved the distribution side of things as has no other coin so far! so cmon keep at it this game you are playing has been played by so many fools before you on other projects oh including bitcoin...but yeah keep it up we know you're great at working at something that will never succeed! but honestly i'm out now do your worst you make me sick..literally because you just don't have the first clue! I'm glad you left the shadow community actually you are a bit of a tossa!

but the difference is, satoshi was never in it for the money, he wanted to build something that would change the world. Altcoin investors are purely driven by monetary gains and thus, would dump their coins if it meant earning 10 million dollars or whatever it could amount to.

durrrr thats why sdc markets are the way they are...fuck you are a dumb cunt i swear. Yes i'm using foul abuse but you mate are a dead set fucking dropkick and deserver it all!

Shadow is in no way impatient nor is the community doing back room deals with stupid pump groups for a quick pump..it always fails and every one almost have all sucumbed to failure because people cant keep their mouths shut...shadow devs just work and if they were in it for money they would not be here they would be working for giants like microsoft ect etc they do it because they want to build something for their kids and help someone somewhere in the world..all you want to do is throw mud at them..shame on you! stupid stupid kid!

thanks for the reply, but I stand firm here and think SDC would be a bad investment choice for any investor whether new or experienced based on the current distribution of wealth. You have filthy pigs that hold probably 80-90% of the total coins who will also destroy any possible monetary gain for the average/small time investor. In fact, its these pigs that will steal hundreds of BTC from new investors, and they've done it before. SDC will be dead before you know and it will probably happen before ZK is released - I actually think it will never release but time will tell..


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 04:03:25 AM

durrrr thats why sdc markets are the way they are...fuck you are a dumb cunt i swear. Yes i'm using foul abuse but you mate are a dead set fucking dropkick and deserver it all!

Shadow is in no way impatient nor is the community doing back room deals with stupid pump groups for a quick pump..it always fails and every one almost have all sucumbed to failure because people cant keep their mouths shut...shadow devs just work and if they were in it for money they would not be here they would be working for giants like microsoft ect etc they do it because they want to build something for their kids and help someone somewhere in the world..all you want to do is throw mud at them..shame on you! stupid stupid kid!

thanks for the reply, but I stand firm here and think SDC would be a bad investment choice for any investor whether new or experienced based on the current distribution of wealth. You have filthy pigs that hold probably 80-90% of the total coins who will also destroy any possible monetary gain for the average/small time investor. In fact, its these pigs that will steal hundreds of BTC from new investors, and they've done it before. SDC will be dead before you know and it will probably happen before ZK is released - I actually think it will never release but time will tell..

We get it. You're an XC investor playing damage control, so you want to take out the recent XC findings out on SDC.

The only filthy pig here is you. You are making baseless accusations of coin holdings with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. In fact those claims of a few people holding the majority of Shadow originated from BobSurplus.. So that makes you his bitch.

And the weird thing is in the XC thread people are showing evidence linking Dan to Hal where he reviewed his own coin and you dismiss that as FUD. Yet you're willing to put your reputation on the line here and smear an honest project like Shadow.

http://www.ratemyfunnypictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Seems-Legit.jpg


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 04:03:52 AM
Yeah no probs i mean we can all see your opinions of whats good and not are pretty well reversed from what is really good and bad

check these out then go check on your xc thread! ever coin we have exposed we have done it with factual evidence! all you have is warped realities and conjecture!
i'm telling you its so much easier being good vs bad..bad is so much more work and you get little reward! thats the really stupid thing about it!

http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#0
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#1
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#3
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#5
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#6
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#7
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#8


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 04:04:34 AM
Some more Zerocoin info on Bloat. Did SDC Ryno figure all this out faster than noted phd's that created it?


Zerocoin is the most complex of the bunch. It uses a combination of digital commitments, one-way accumulators, zero-knowledge proofs, and some extensions to the existing bitcoin protocol to attain an extremely high level of anonymity. It’s difficult to translate all of this into simpler terms, but if you’re interesting in a more ‘technical’ explanation you can find it here.

Of course, such a high level of anonymity does not come without tradeoffs – zerocoin has a high amount of overhead. A zerocoin proof (344 bytes) is needed for each transaction, and stored within the blockchain for eternity. These proofs must be processed by network nodes, adding not only significant storage bloat, but computational requirements as well. Keep in mind that the average bitcoin transaction is about 400 bytes in size, so this is no small amount.

Zerocoin is not even released yet, so it could very well trim itself down before then. For reference, the first implementation used a 50kb proof… But in it’s current state, it doesn’t scale very well. It would function just fine as an altcoin, but if you were to scale the network up to bitcoin size, it’s likely too bloated for it to work. Also worth mentioning is that all the fancy math that zerocoin employs could also open the door for some sort of unforeseen exploit.

bloat is not an issue when you can prune the data fool..cmon got anymore bs!


How about having to 100% trust that the dev will destroy the special key at the launch? You know the one that if he doesn't he can create as many coins as he wants at will. ? 100% turst SDCdev and trolls and all the other nasty coin bashing guys that lie about their developments? Yeah right sure mate!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 04:07:01 AM
Some more Zerocoin info on Bloat. Did SDC Ryno figure all this out faster than noted phd's that created it?


Zerocoin is the most complex of the bunch. It uses a combination of digital commitments, one-way accumulators, zero-knowledge proofs, and some extensions to the existing bitcoin protocol to attain an extremely high level of anonymity. It’s difficult to translate all of this into simpler terms, but if you’re interesting in a more ‘technical’ explanation you can find it here.

Of course, such a high level of anonymity does not come without tradeoffs – zerocoin has a high amount of overhead. A zerocoin proof (344 bytes) is needed for each transaction, and stored within the blockchain for eternity. These proofs must be processed by network nodes, adding not only significant storage bloat, but computational requirements as well. Keep in mind that the average bitcoin transaction is about 400 bytes in size, so this is no small amount.

Zerocoin is not even released yet, so it could very well trim itself down before then. For reference, the first implementation used a 50kb proof… But in it’s current state, it doesn’t scale very well. It would function just fine as an altcoin, but if you were to scale the network up to bitcoin size, it’s likely too bloated for it to work. Also worth mentioning is that all the fancy math that zerocoin employs could also open the door for some sort of unforeseen exploit.

bloat is not an issue when you can prune the data fool..cmon got anymore bs!


How about having to 100% trust that the dev will destroy the special key at the launch? You know the one that if he doesn't he can create as many coins as he wants at will. ? 100% turst SDCdev and trolls and all the other nasty coin bashing guys that lie about their developments? Yeah right sure mate!
All you have is conjecture we don't come at people without proof so fuck off back to fairy land where everything revolves around you..you really have no clue what you are talking about but think you do and thats the nutty part of it all!!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 04:09:24 AM
Yeah no probs i mean we can all see your opinions of whats good and not are pretty well reversed from what is really good and bad

check these out then go check on your xc thread! ever coin we have exposed we have done it with factual evidence! all you have is warped realities and conjecture!
i'm telling you its so much easier being good vs bad..bad is so much more work and you get little reward! thats the really stupid thing about it!




Ok you answer to the Epic Fail that is SDC Zerocoin aka zk-snarks is to bring up crap about some other guys on a different coin? I am going to post everywhere I can the epci fail of SDC's zerocoin. Bloated blockchain and 100% trust to destroy geneis key for it. Not that he couldn't have a copy of it some where either. 100's of thousands for SDC coins being minted at will to dump. Sic!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: 00Smurf on October 31, 2014, 04:10:24 AM
Some more Zerocoin info on Bloat. Did SDC Ryno figure all this out faster than noted phd's that created it?


Zerocoin is the most complex of the bunch. It uses a combination of digital commitments, one-way accumulators, zero-knowledge proofs, and some extensions to the existing bitcoin protocol to attain an extremely high level of anonymity. It’s difficult to translate all of this into simpler terms, but if you’re interesting in a more ‘technical’ explanation you can find it here.

Of course, such a high level of anonymity does not come without tradeoffs – zerocoin has a high amount of overhead. A zerocoin proof (344 bytes) is needed for each transaction, and stored within the blockchain for eternity. These proofs must be processed by network nodes, adding not only significant storage bloat, but computational requirements as well. Keep in mind that the average bitcoin transaction is about 400 bytes in size, so this is no small amount.

Zerocoin is not even released yet, so it could very well trim itself down before then. For reference, the first implementation used a 50kb proof… But in it’s current state, it doesn’t scale very well. It would function just fine as an altcoin, but if you were to scale the network up to bitcoin size, it’s likely too bloated for it to work. Also worth mentioning is that all the fancy math that zerocoin employs could also open the door for some sort of unforeseen exploit.

bloat is not an issue when you can prune the data fool..cmon got anymore bs!


How about having to 100% trust that the dev will destroy the special key at the launch? You know the one that if he doesn't he can create as many coins as he wants at will. ? 100% turst SDCdev and trolls and all the other nasty coin bashing guys that lie about their developments? Yeah right sure mate!

Shadows implementation will not require a trusted start. It will be trustless. Just watch and see.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 04:11:18 AM
Long quit feeding the TrangLee troll. He thinks Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void. Rather than research the troll will continue to spew crap. Note the puckered lips and unused anus.

http://www.damnlol.com/i/ccf1526ecdbd3eba7f18c7b62c9531cc.jpg


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 04:13:47 AM
Long quite feeding the TrangLee troll. He think Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void.

Zerocoin is zk-snarks. Shadowsend uses zk-snarks. :) 

Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data.

I'm sorry but I don't trust you or the SDC dev to make sure this actually happens. I am sure most people here won't trust you or him to do it. If they do they are damn fools.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 04:16:25 AM
Yeah no probs i mean we can all see your opinions of whats good and not are pretty well reversed from what is really good and bad

check these out then go check on your xc thread! ever coin we have exposed we have done it with factual evidence! all you have is warped realities and conjecture!
i'm telling you its so much easier being good vs bad..bad is so much more work and you get little reward! thats the really stupid thing about it!




Ok you answer to the Epic Fail that is SDC Zerocoin aka zk-snarks is to bring up crap about some other guys on a different coin? I am going to post everywhere I can the epci fail of SDC's zerocoin. Bloated blockchain and 100% trust to destroy geneis key for it. Not that he couldn't have a copy of it some where either. 100's of thousands for SDC coins being minted at will to dump. Sic!

You can spread your lies all you want..thats why i think you are a twit you just have no evidence and you are insulting everyone by thinking you will fool anyone but yourself and your other dimwitted friends!
the world dosn't revolve around bitcointalk son! so believing that is a threat tbh is really really making me sick now..i am defo out this time foreal you really really made me ill then!
I feel really sorry for the people around you, your very nature is so opressive!


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 04:21:21 AM
Yeah no probs i mean we can all see your opinions of whats good and not are pretty well reversed from what is really good and bad

check these out then go check on your xc thread! ever coin we have exposed we have done it with factual evidence! all you have is warped realities and conjecture!
i'm telling you its so much easier being good vs bad..bad is so much more work and you get little reward! thats the really stupid thing about it!




Ok you answer to the Epic Fail that is SDC Zerocoin aka zk-snarks is to bring up crap about some other guys on a different coin? I am going to post everywhere I can the epci fail of SDC's zerocoin. Bloated blockchain and 100% trust to destroy geneis key for it. Not that he couldn't have a copy of it some where either. 100's of thousands for SDC coins being minted at will to dump. Sic!

You can spread your lies all you want..thats why i think you are a twit you just have no evidence and you are insulting everyone by thinking you will fool anyone but yourself and your other dimwitted friends!
the world dosn't revolve around bitcointalk son! so believing that is a threat tbh is really really making me sick now..i am defo out this time foreal you really really made me ill then!
I feel really sorry for the people around you, your very nature is so opressive!


You are out again for the 3x? Lol you are like a fie circling a pound of shit. No matter how bad the smell you keep coming back for more. Thing is the pound of shit here is really SDC. You should get a spell checker. It's for real and oppressive. Dim whit.

Just a reminder. besure to trust these guys to destroy the keys and info so they don't make anymore coins.  ;)


Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret start up data.




Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: FurianSun on October 31, 2014, 04:29:42 AM
Long quite feeding the TrangLee troll. He think Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void.

Zerocoin is zk-snarks. Shadowsend uses zk-snarks. :)  

Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data.

I'm sorry but I don't trust you or the SDC dev to make sure this actually happens. I am sure most people here won't trust you or him to do it. If they do they are damn fools.

Neither do I. This guys lie and fud other coins to make their case or bring down competitors against SDC.

Oh yeah then there was the Big huge Giant even of ZK-Snark implementation in September!!! Yeah!!! Oh fuck! wait wait its almost November?!! Aw shit another zeroscam lie.

Yes read the entry for sept and zk-snarks implementation.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BwGZkikCYAA4Eut.png


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: 00Smurf on October 31, 2014, 04:36:44 AM
Long quite feeding the TrangLee troll. He think Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void.

Zerocoin is zk-snarks. Shadowsend uses zk-snarks. :)  

Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data.

I'm sorry but I don't trust you or the SDC dev to make sure this actually happens. I am sure most people here won't trust you or him to do it. If they do they are damn fools.

Neither do I. This guys lie and fud other coins to make their case or bring down competitors against SDC.

Oh yeah then there was the Big huge Giant even of ZK-Snark implementation in September!!! Yeah!!! Oh fuck! wait wait its almost November?!! Aw shit another zeroscam lie.

Yes read the entry for sept and zk-snarks implementation.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BwGZkikCYAA4Eut.png


Good thinking there is never any delays in software development right. Oh wait everything comes on time, nothing is ever late. Wake up man. A small delay is different from months or yyears.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: FurianSun on October 31, 2014, 04:41:04 AM
I see you have been trolling the attacking people too 00Smurf. http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#8  Proofs in the pudding. SDC's very own 002 smurf in action. For shame. SDC guys never harasses or trouble other coins. No way man.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: FurianSun on October 31, 2014, 04:45:24 AM
Yeah no probs i mean we can all see your opinions of whats good and not are pretty well reversed from what is really good and bad

check these out then go check on your xc thread! ever coin we have exposed we have done it with factual evidence! all you have is warped realities and conjecture!
i'm telling you its so much easier being good vs bad..bad is so much more work and you get little reward! thats the really stupid thing about it!




Ok you answer to the Epic Fail that is SDC Zerocoin aka zk-snarks is to bring up crap about some other guys on a different coin? I am going to post everywhere I can the epci fail of SDC's zerocoin. Bloated blockchain and 100% trust to destroy geneis key for it. Not that he couldn't have a copy of it some where either. 100's of thousands for SDC coins being minted at will to dump. Sic!

You can spread your lies all you want..thats why i think you are a twit you just have no evidence and you are insulting everyone by thinking you will fool anyone but yourself and your other dimwitted friends!
the world dosn't revolve around bitcointalk son! so believing that is a threat tbh is really really making me sick now..i am defo out this time foreal you really really made me ill then!
I feel really sorry for the people around you, your very nature is so opressive!


You are out again for the 3x? Lol you are like a fly circling a pound of shit. No matter how bad the smell you keep coming back for more. Thing is the pound of shit here is really SDC. You should get a spell checker. It's for real and oppressive. Dim whit.

Just a reminder. besure to trust these guys to destroy the keys and info so they don't make anymore coins.  ;)


Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret start up data.





Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: 00Smurf on October 31, 2014, 04:46:02 AM
I see you have been trolling the attacking people too 002smurf. http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#8  Proofs in the pudding. SDC's very own 002 smurf in action. For shame. SDC guys never harasses or trouble other coins. No way man.

So that was a troll? I was being dragged into the middle of something. I cleared up the "out of context", now people can sort it out seeing the exact words of the conversation in context.

I didn't make shit up or go out of my way to attack someone, i've been threatened enough over this.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: subversionary on October 31, 2014, 04:54:46 AM
If this is all reality and I'm not living in a FUD fantasy land then I applaud what you did 00Smurff. Way to keep them honest.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: zk-SNARK on October 31, 2014, 04:55:42 AM
Long quite feeding the TrangLee troll. He think Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void.

Zerocoin is zk-snarks. Shadowsend uses zk-snarks. :)  

Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data.

I'm sorry but I don't trust you or the SDC dev to make sure this actually happens. I am sure most people here won't trust you or him to do it. If they do they are damn fools.


This is indeed true. You have to trust that the dev team will destroy any and all copies of the start up keys/and such. I am a huge fan of Zerocoin/cash and have followed them since early Jan. They changed to Zerocash in May/June. Even they say that its what has to be done other wise more coin can be made on the blockchain. They also acknowledge the bloat issue and is in fact one of the main reason they didn't release a "coin".



Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 05:05:50 AM
You guys crying fud and what not but you are all here doing what..with what you have no evidence you're just pathetic children..hypocriytes! I have no time for the likes of criminals like you! And you are not fooling anyone This is what a real project looks like so you best be getting used to the logo..its not going away! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: Coolstoryteller on October 31, 2014, 05:11:43 AM
Long quite feeding the TrangLee troll. He think Zerocoin is Shadowsend. Argument is null and void.

Zerocoin is zk-snarks. Shadowsend uses zk-snarks. :)  

Quote
Additionally, ZeroCoin/ZeroCash also has what many consider to be a fatal flaw in the way it works. At launch, everyone using the network must trust the creator to destroy certain secret startup data.

I'm sorry but I don't trust you or the SDC dev to make sure this actually happens. I am sure most people here won't trust you or him to do it. If they do they are damn fools.


This is indeed true. You have to trust that the dev team will destroy any and all copies of the start up keys/and such. I am a huge fan of Zerocoin/cash and have followed them since early Jan. They changed to Zerocash in May/June. Even they say that its what has to be done other wise more coin can be made on the blockchain. They also acknowledge the bloat issue and is in fact one of the main reason they didn't release a "coin".

I personally wouldn't trust these guys to be ride of the keys either.

A trustless setup for zerocoin can be done with RSA-UFO like in the anoncoin project.

Zerocoin doesn't use zk-SNARKs. Zerocash does (hopefully that educated the troll you quoted).

zk-SNARKs can be implemented using PCP-based zk-SNARKs to eliminate trusted setup parameters.

zk-Shadow does not require a trusted setup.

Like you, I have been following progress in the anon vertical for a very long time.  Stay tuned my friend, history is in the making.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: jwinterm on October 31, 2014, 11:50:20 AM
I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

It wasn't my comment. I was the one who posted about the fact that 95% of shadowcash are owned by 84 addresses, which is another reason I wouldn't buy any. Also, I don't think the reddit poster or myself asked for a short explanation, at least I said technical explanation, which you have successfully avoided again.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: SebSebastian on October 31, 2014, 02:30:41 PM
I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

It wasn't my comment. I was the one who posted about the fact that 95% of shadowcash are owned by 84 addresses, which is another reason I wouldn't buy any. Also, I don't think the reddit poster or myself asked for a short explanation, at least I said technical explanation, which you have successfully avoided again.


To be fair it's quite a young coin and the community is still growing. There's plenty for sale on Bittrex, so hopefully as more people become aware of the quality of the development work that's going on, more people will invest and the distribution will become less of an issue.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 05:11:45 PM
I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

It wasn't my comment. I was the one who posted about the fact that 95% of shadowcash are owned by 84 addresses, which is another reason I wouldn't buy any. Also, I don't think the reddit poster or myself asked for a short explanation, at least I said technical explanation, which you have successfully avoided again.


To be fair it's quite a young coin and the community is still growing. There's plenty for sale on Bittrex, so hopefully as more people become aware of the quality of the development work that's going on, more people will invest and the distribution will become less of an issue.

Yeah ok. Let them be fair. They troll attack and attempt to destroy other coins all the while give the Alt scene a big black eye. On top of that we need to trust them to destroy the mint all you can dream of key and related files. Don't be naive and stupid dealing with these guys. As for coin distribution they just made many addresses in their wallets so it looks spread over 80 (which is still a small core) even if it's in 4-10 actual wallets. also they probably have most on exchanges waiting to DUMP the second people believe this scam they are crafting.


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 05:14:38 PM
I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

It wasn't my comment. I was the one who posted about the fact that 95% of shadowcash are owned by 84 addresses, which is another reason I wouldn't buy any. Also, I don't think the reddit poster or myself asked for a short explanation, at least I said technical explanation, which you have successfully avoided again.


To be fair it's quite a young coin and the community is still growing. There's plenty for sale on Bittrex, so hopefully as more people become aware of the quality of the development work that's going on, more people will invest and the distribution will become less of an issue.

Yeah ok. Let them be fair. They troll attack and attempt to destroy other coins all the while give the Alt scene a big black eye. On top of that we need to trust them to destroy the mint all you can dream of key and related files. Don't be naive and stupid dealing with these guys. As for coin distribution they just made many addresses in their wallets so it looks spread over 80 (which is still a small core) even if it's in 4-10 actual wallets. also they probably have most on exchanges waiting to DUMP the second people believe this scam they are crafting.

Only person in that quote list being naive and stupid is you, you have been explained to that it is not a trusted setup system.. There is no "mint all you can dream of key" your proposal of it being such is stupid! dense much?  ::)


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: SebSebastian on October 31, 2014, 07:46:43 PM
I've changed the op you were right about one thing it was misleading and an oversight i apologise!

If that was you in that reddit post and you want to play that pick at words game then sure lets play! You didn't ask for a short explanation you have waited not even a week for an explanation to your junk filled comment, full of conjecture and utter garbage. You are nothing short of playing guessing games tbh

It wasn't my comment. I was the one who posted about the fact that 95% of shadowcash are owned by 84 addresses, which is another reason I wouldn't buy any. Also, I don't think the reddit poster or myself asked for a short explanation, at least I said technical explanation, which you have successfully avoided again.


To be fair it's quite a young coin and the community is still growing. There's plenty for sale on Bittrex, so hopefully as more people become aware of the quality of the development work that's going on, more people will invest and the distribution will become less of an issue.

Yeah ok. Let them be fair. They troll attack and attempt to destroy other coins all the while give the Alt scene a big black eye. On top of that we need to trust them to destroy the mint all you can dream of key and related files. Don't be naive and stupid dealing with these guys. As for coin distribution they just made many addresses in their wallets so it looks spread over 80 (which is still a small core) even if it's in 4-10 actual wallets. also they probably have most on exchanges waiting to DUMP the second people believe this scam they are crafting.


Where is your evidence for there being 4-10 wallets? I just looked at your posting history and it looks like FUDing Shadow has become the central focus of your existence. No offence, but I don't think that's very healthy. There's so much amazing stuff going on in the world of cryptocurrencies, isn't there something more productive you could be doing? "Lead by example" and all that.  :)


Title: Re: ShadowCash SDC Don't Miss The Huge Historical Event
Post by: bangomatic on October 31, 2014, 09:12:45 PM
actually, i own 4.20 million sdc. which means they can't possibly own that much.

If you do in which i doubt there is 6+ million SDC trolls owns 1.4 and no exact number is on the rest so that leaves 1 million coins own by everyone else according to you if pookie and longnshort own none at all. Still possible.

So if you really do own 4.20 (weed fan here) that is even worse for the coin. You could single handedly dump the coin to 1 sat and or cause a 51% attack. Your hurting their cause more than helping with you stupid fanboy bullshit.

TrangLee is so dense he can't even see when people are trolling him. Take your FUD conversation back to your SDC FUD thread. Which BTW was started by the LXC dev. I'll be sure to grab a screenshot of the Skype logs for that where the LXC dev admits he is the one who started that smear thread. You're such a tool that you participated in a FUD campaign against SDC orchestrated by the LXC dev which to my knowledge has nothing to do with Stealthcoin besides being a partner in BlockNet. Baseless accusations, mindless trolling and unnecessary personal attacks = Bitcointalk community. Seems like the shitcoin communities always take it upon themselves to attack Shadow.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=383543 this is an alt account for the LXC dev "KidKrypto"

I hang at the LXC thread quite a bit and don't ever remember seeing "KidKrypto" mentioned as a dev.  The only devs are Librexcoindev, sinetek,and zerocashdev. AFAIK.