|
Title: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 05:02:15 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. HERE ARE THE ANSWERS I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? NO Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Code reviews are public information Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) NO Thankyou ..finally for your answers now i can move on as it is now etched into the forum! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: cryptohunter on October 31, 2014, 05:08:00 PM I hope if he answers these questions to everyones satisfaction we can stop cluttering the entire board with this stuff.
If there is a scam let's have some concrete proof presented now so i can dump my xc and block. If not then let's move forward. I bought a few k of block and held xc throught this crash so i'm hoping this is nothing more than fud. However if proven not to be fud and there is evidence to show real scamming or shady tactics then those projects are in serious trouble. Looks bad them shutting down the xc thread. XC team just answer legit questions and delete the rest but do not close the thread, that just looks bad. I see no real proof of wrong doing so far. Although i do think dan should have stuck with the xc road map. I would have supported a hardfork superblock for funds if the premine had of had a full ledger with expenses. I understand that is depleted now sadly, but since there is no real ledger of course questions will be asked about that. Anytime a premine is spent there should be a full ledger. I accept devs need payment but it needs to be fully transparent along with all other costs. Blocknet is a bit of a short term slap in the face for xc holders. I am hoping there will be a full ledger for the alts and BTC raised on the blocknet sale. For now i remain positive about xc and blocknet but not as positive as i was about xc before this all came about. Blocknet could be great. Perhaps the funds raised should have only been gradually released as work was completed. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 05:24:40 PM I hope if he answers these questions to everyones satisfaction we can stop cluttering the entire board with this stuff. If there is a scam let's have some concrete proof presented now so i can dump my xc and block. If not then let's move forward. I bought a few k of block and held xc throught this crash so i'm hoping this is nothing more than fud. However if proven not to be fud and there is evidence to show real scamming or shady tactics then those projects are in serious trouble. Looks bad them shutting down the xc thread. XC team just answer legit questions and delete the rest but do not close the thread, that just looks bad. I see no real proof of wrong doing so far. Although i do think dan should have stuck with the xc road map. I would have supported a hardfork superblock for funds if the premine had of had a full ledger with expenses. I understand that is depleted now sadly, but since there is no real ledger of course questions will be asked about that. Anytime a premine is spent there should be a full ledger. I accept devs need payment but it needs to be fully transparent along with all other costs. Blocknet is a bit of a short term slap in the face for xc holders. I am hoping there will be a full ledger for the alts and BTC raised on the blocknet sale. For now i remain positive about xc and blocknet but not as positive as i was about xc before this all came about. Blocknet could be great. Perhaps the funds raised should have only been gradually released as work was completed. It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/ Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: Mr.Wonderful on October 31, 2014, 05:29:10 PM He doesn't need to answer. This is a bunch of childish crap. They should ban you from the forums. Grow up, this is what I was talking about and why your coin is in the trash.
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: UnicornFarts on October 31, 2014, 05:29:15 PM Quote It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/ This is hilarious. Notice that those who don't have totalitarian rules in their moderated threads don't get as much negative press? Try to control free speech and people start digging. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: shanuu on October 31, 2014, 05:33:21 PM Quote It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/ This is hilarious. Notice that those who don't have totalitarian rules in their moderated threads don't get as much negative press? Try to control free speech and people start digging. Veried!!! Diden't know that "to fake" means "to dig" ??? Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 05:34:41 PM Quote It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/ This is hilarious. Notice that those who don't have totalitarian rules in their moderated threads don't get as much negative press? Try to control free speech and people start digging. u want to know what is hilarious. As soon as new fud was released last night a mysterious 40 BTC entered the buy order book. Take whatever you want from it, you're free to believe what you choose to, but there is clear manipulation happening here regardless of whether some of the statements have even the slightest bit of authenticity Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: synechist on October 31, 2014, 05:45:19 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. Sorry folks, but in no way does engaging with this thread legitimise XC. And we will not legitimise your expectations by engaging. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9395895#msg9395895 Bye. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: WowWtf on October 31, 2014, 05:48:39 PM Quote It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/ This is hilarious. Notice that those who don't have totalitarian rules in their moderated threads don't get as much negative press? Try to control free speech and people start digging. u want to know what is hilarious. As soon as new fud was released last night a mysterious 40 BTC entered the buy order book. Take whatever you want from it, you're free to believe what you choose to, but there is clear manipulation happening here regardless of whether some of the statements have even the slightest bit of authenticity I can confirm there is manipulation going on, some users are actively creating new accounts in the attempt to deceive the holders into selling at lower prices with negative press. Also, non-moderated threads are by far the worst. Darkcoin's thread is the perfect example. 80% of all posts on that thread are Negative/Deceptive/Lies/FUD. There again were users deceiving others with lies into selling Darkcoin(Before the historic pump). Same goes for Bitcoindark's previous Supernet to which users also started FUD to get in at cheap prices. Lesson is: Don't believe anyone telling you to "sell", especially with a solid development plan. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 05:48:48 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. Sorry folks, but in no way does engaging with this thread legitimise XC. And we will not legitimise your expectations by engaging. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9395895#msg9395895 Bye. Well these are pretty straight forward questions so i guess you are just going to leave them open, which might i add is extremely suspicious. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: atcsecure on October 31, 2014, 05:49:42 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 05:50:49 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. Sorry folks, but in no way does engaging with this thread legitimise XC. And we will not legitimise your expectations by engaging. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9395895#msg9395895 Bye. Well these are pretty straight forward questions so i guess you are just going to leave them open, which might i add is extremely suspicious. Go put those straight forward questions in your ass. Poor ass shill Go get a real job. Being a paid fudder will not feed your kids (which I hope you don't have). Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 05:51:41 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf You MUST ignore those retards and focus on the important things. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: G-Bert on October 31, 2014, 05:52:35 PM I hope if he answers these questions to everyones satisfaction we can stop cluttering the entire board with this stuff. If there is a scam let's have some concrete proof presented now so i can dump my xc and block. If not then let's move forward. I bought a few k of block and held xc throught this crash so i'm hoping this is nothing more than fud. However if proven not to be fud and there is evidence to show real scamming or shady tactics then those projects are in serious trouble. Looks bad them shutting down the xc thread. XC team just answer legit questions and delete the rest but do not close the thread, that just looks bad. I see no real proof of wrong doing so far. Although i do think dan should have stuck with the xc road map. I would have supported a hardfork superblock for funds if the premine had of had a full ledger with expenses. I understand that is depleted now sadly, but since there is no real ledger of course questions will be asked about that. Anytime a premine is spent there should be a full ledger. I accept devs need payment but it needs to be fully transparent along with all other costs. Blocknet is a bit of a short term slap in the face for xc holders. I am hoping there will be a full ledger for the alts and BTC raised on the blocknet sale. For now i remain positive about xc and blocknet but not as positive as i was about xc before this all came about. Blocknet could be great. Perhaps the funds raised should have only been gradually released as work was completed. These are all my thoughts exactly. Well put. Looking forward to the answers. Fuck the speculation until we get them, or some real proof of scam. Edit - didn't see this as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf So Now, real evidence or STFU! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 05:53:52 PM I hope if he answers these questions to everyones satisfaction we can stop cluttering the entire board with this stuff. If there is a scam let's have some concrete proof presented now so i can dump my xc and block. If not then let's move forward. I bought a few k of block and held xc throught this crash so i'm hoping this is nothing more than fud. However if proven not to be fud and there is evidence to show real scamming or shady tactics then those projects are in serious trouble. Looks bad them shutting down the xc thread. XC team just answer legit questions and delete the rest but do not close the thread, that just looks bad. I see no real proof of wrong doing so far. Although i do think dan should have stuck with the xc road map. I would have supported a hardfork superblock for funds if the premine had of had a full ledger with expenses. I understand that is depleted now sadly, but since there is no real ledger of course questions will be asked about that. Anytime a premine is spent there should be a full ledger. I accept devs need payment but it needs to be fully transparent along with all other costs. Blocknet is a bit of a short term slap in the face for xc holders. I am hoping there will be a full ledger for the alts and BTC raised on the blocknet sale. For now i remain positive about xc and blocknet but not as positive as i was about xc before this all came about. Blocknet could be great. Perhaps the funds raised should have only been gradually released as work was completed. These are all my thoughts exactly. Well put. Looking forward to the answers. Fuck the speculation until we get them, or some real proof of scam. No, closing the official thread is the best move, since the coin have an official forum. Serious questions and answers can be posted right there. http://forum.xctalk.com/ Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: atcsecure on October 31, 2014, 05:54:12 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Dude I did answer them, in order just separate out the comma's and each one is the answer to the question in the listed order... Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 05:55:50 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 05:56:50 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: WowWtf on October 31, 2014, 05:58:25 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? yea I gotta agree. that was pretty fuckin stupid LongandShort. who the hell do you think you are lol. no one needs to answer your questions in a "cohesive manner" buddy. Sit Down. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: atcsecure on October 31, 2014, 05:59:04 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of How you asked? WTF.... GTFO, I answered the questions Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 05:59:28 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of GTFO Shill Your luck is that Dan is a nice person. I hope he'll go like "fu** you" to all of you, ignoring you all and keeping the focus on serious matters. Not a bunch of low life losers, making their living from spreading FUD on the forum. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 06:00:45 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: jibble on October 31, 2014, 06:04:21 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) are you schizophrenic? he answered your questions, you claim it wasn't how you wanted them......now you are thanking him for answering them now and asking more? Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 06:05:06 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) are you schizophrenic? he answer your questions, you claim it wasn't how you wanted them......now you are thanking him for answering them now and asking more? buzz off i said he answered SOME! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:05:17 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) are you schizophrenic? he answer your questions, you claim it wasn't how you wanted them......now you are thanking him for answering them now and asking more? What can you expect from a brainless person? :)) Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 06:05:40 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of buddy, if you think he's going to waste his time writing complete sentences with in depth explanations for each, then you're off your rocker. He is the main dev for XC and is supposed to be coding right now, not dealing with this crap, especially those who aren't even investors and are looking to stir the pot. You probably just want to single out some of his answers, and if they dont match your expectations, you can continue to FUD about them. I know how the game works, and anyone that has been here for a while knows exactly what is happening. If you're lucky you may get better responses from our forum and or team members over there, but to expect every single little bit of detail to be written down when straight forward answers will suffice, is being ignorant and just looking to create more turmoil. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: atcsecure on October 31, 2014, 06:06:35 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? NO Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Code reviews are public information Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) NO Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:08:32 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) are you schizophrenic? he answer your questions, you claim it wasn't how you wanted them......now you are thanking him for answering them now and asking more? buzz off i said he answered SOME! God, I'd pay so much to put my hands on a freaking ignorant thing like you. I'd gladly go to prison from having some FUN with your limbs. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: pr0m3thief2013 on October 31, 2014, 06:09:16 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of buddy, if you think he's going to waste his time writing complete sentences with in depth explanations for each, then you're off your rocker. He is the main dev for XC and is supposed to be coding right now, not dealing with this crap, especially those who aren't even investors and are looking to stir the pot. You probably just want to single out some of his answers, and if they dont match your expectations, you can continue to FUD about them. I know how the game works, and anyone that has been here for a while knows exactly what is happening. If you're lucky you may get better responses from our forum and or team members over there, but to expect every single little bit of detail to be written down when straight forward answers will suffice, is being ignorant and just looking to create more turmoil. 1. Dan claims professionalism but its so hard for him to answer this in a professional manner and move on with it. 2. Either Prom (Who has already said he has hired Dan for some project he feel interested with) or Dan (who claims prom is lying and that everything is a fad) are lying, promising future for xc and blocknet. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 06:10:04 PM Don't call me buddy, i asked a fucking simple set of questions you're not helping at all so piss off! I have enough of this shit copping so much crap. Some cunt said dan is involved. Its taken us days to get some answers because all of you dickheads keep covering it all up and making a ton of noise. ffs dan answer ALL of the fucking questions so we can move on!
qawzsx go neck yourself you fucking gimp you are wasting perfect oxygen id rather see leak out of hole in the ozone layer. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: G-Bert on October 31, 2014, 06:10:36 PM Why not post both of Dans replies (That answer all questions) under the first post in this thread and be done?
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: WowWtf on October 31, 2014, 06:11:16 PM Don't call me buddy, i asked a fucking simple set of questions you're not helping at all so piss off! I have enough of this shit copping so much crap. Some cunt said dan is involved. Its taken us days to get some answers because all of you dickheads keep covering it all up and making a ton of noise. ffs dan answer ALL of the fucking questions so we can move on! qawzsx go neck yourself you fucking gimp you are wasting perfect oxygen id rather see leak out of hole in the ozone layer. you are the absolute dumbest troll ever. youre giving the rest of us a bad name. dude get off. sit down. retard. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 06:12:16 PM I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all 1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!) 2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did) 3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent) 4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this? 5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) 6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) 7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? 8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all) 9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to? If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on. as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? NO Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Code reviews are public information Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) NO Thankyou ..finally for your answers now i can move on as it is now etched into the forum! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: UnicornFarts on October 31, 2014, 06:12:27 PM Saying Dan doesn't need to respond to those screenshots is like saying Obama doesn't need to respond to his sit down meeting with Osama Bin Laden after an orphanage was blown up by an Al Quida suicide bomber.
Look at your price people - just saying "we don't need to respond" is pretty much the worst possible way in the world to handle this. Or just respond to small pieces like Dan has done. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:16:07 PM Saying Dan doesn't need to respond to those screenshots is like saying Obama doesn't need to respond to his sit down meeting with Osama Bin Laden after an orphanage was blown up by an Al Quida suicide bomber. Look at your price people - just saying "we don't need to respond" is pretty much the worst possible way in the world to handle this. Or just respond to small pieces like Dan has done. Dude, put your tiny head in your ass... No supposed scammer is going public like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9394978#msg9394978 You bunch of idiots Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 06:19:52 PM Why not post both of Dans replies (That answer all questions) under the first post in this thread and be done? Thats what im frustrated with, it can be so easy but all made so bloody difficult. Most of these clowns should be ashamed of themselves. Dan has some serious accusations on him and has treated it like a bit of a joke really.. There is a huge lesson in all of this and because he has never once given a cohesive answer in one place its all spread out and has not don't help him but feel free to reference this thread. Personally i don't believe any of it but i only have his say vs a known pumpers and i tend to be of the opinion that dan would be wise to cut affiliation with prom. So it all makes sense but its all done now so im moving on. Thankyou dan for engaging and stfu idiots for making it a long drawn out process with your 2 day old accounts!! We have plenty to reference when the next line of revelations surface! I'm putting the answers in the op now! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: atcsecure on October 31, 2014, 06:28:03 PM Why not post both of Dans replies (That answer all questions) under the first post in this thread and be done? Thats what im frustrated with, it can be so easy but all made so bloody difficult. Most of these clowns should be ashamed of themselves. Dan has some serious accusations on him and has treated it like a bit of a joke really.. How do you expect me to treat it when I see things like Dan Metcalf = Prom , and everything else that is being posted by a bunch of newbie accounts? Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:28:06 PM Saying Dan doesn't need to respond to those screenshots is like saying Obama doesn't need to respond to his sit down meeting with Osama Bin Laden after an orphanage was blown up by an Al Quida suicide bomber. Look at your price people - just saying "we don't need to respond" is pretty much the worst possible way in the world to handle this. Or just respond to small pieces like Dan has done. Dude, put your tiny head in your ass... No supposed scammer is going public like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9394978#msg9394978 You bunch of idiots Only those scamer like IconicExpert who was so smart to give away his living address when he was fucking off community members. Sometimes even scamers start to think that they are untouchable. You must be idiot :)))))) Do you really believe that he gave his real address? :))) What a moron you are Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: rdnkjdi on October 31, 2014, 06:30:16 PM Quote Dude, put your tiny head in your ass... No supposed scammer is going public like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9394978#msg9394978 You bunch of idiots You mean like Jasinlee who loved using his real name saying he wasn't going to scam, etc etc before scamming people out of millions on the ASIC pre-orders? The guy Teka called a team member a few months ago? Yeah ... sorry bub. Real life developer who's aknowledged his identity from that team has scammed people. So that proves nothing. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: cryptohunter on October 31, 2014, 06:34:10 PM Seems to me he answered the important questions.
Without conclusive evidence to prove his answers are false i see no point discussing it further. Sure investigate all you want, then come back with some conclusive hard evidence, otherwise drop it. I don't like what blocknet has done to the price of xc but i see no real wrong doing. I would not have kept as many xc had i known the key dev was starting another project and that the vast bulk of the premine has been used up. However, i see no evidence of real scams here. Could be viewed as less than transparent and a deviation from the xc road map. Full ledger for everything is key. If the dev says he is working 1000 hours at an hourly rate of $100 then sure sell enough coins to cover that. If the community does not agree with this rate or hours worked they have a choice gradually to sell out of that currency. I feel xc is still one of the only coins from 100's that has a dev that can actually produce something that will add value to an alt. Same for the potential for blocknet. Will hold both for now and see what happens. Real proof of any shady stuff and i guess people will dump. So keep digging by all means, if you find something concrete then let's hear about it. Until then let's drop it. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: spookycoins on October 31, 2014, 06:35:34 PM It's threads like this that are giving crypto a bad name.
Pure speculation on a devs reputation wrapped around a veil of sincere inquiry. Such a shame. Waste your energy doing something else. You're looking like a dumbass to the majority of us. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:36:13 PM Quote Dude, put your tiny head in your ass... No supposed scammer is going public like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9394978#msg9394978 You bunch of idiots You mean like Jasinlee who loved using his real name saying he wasn't going to scam, etc etc before scamming people out of millions on the ASIC pre-orders? The guy Teka called a team member a few months ago? Yeah ... sorry bub. Real life developer who's aknowledged his identity from that team has scammed people. So that proves nothing. A real name is nothing. But, give me your real address and scam me. See what's gonna happen Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: rdnkjdi on October 31, 2014, 06:37:36 PM Quote A real name is nothing. But, give me your real address and scam me. See what's gonna happen uhhh his address / identity is everywhere? it takes like 90 seconds (if you're slow) to find an address? We've got all of his information/families information/etc for lawsuit purposes. so I'm not getting how Dan is any more public than Jasinlee / Jason Hudgins was... Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: qawzsx on October 31, 2014, 06:39:39 PM Quote A real name is nothing. But, give me your real address and scam me. See what's gonna happen uhhh his address / identity is everywhere? it takes like 90 seconds (if you're slow) to find an address? We've got all of his information/families information/etc for lawsuit purposes. so I'm not getting how Dan is any more public than Jasinlee / Jason Hudgins was... lawsuit purposes ... you are so funny :))) Anyway, I won't waste another second of my time with this BS. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 06:47:07 PM Quote Dude, put your tiny head in your ass... No supposed scammer is going public like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9394978#msg9394978 You bunch of idiots You mean like Jasinlee who loved using his real name saying he wasn't going to scam, etc etc before scamming people out of millions on the ASIC pre-orders? The guy Teka called a team member a few months ago? Yeah ... sorry bub. Real life developer who's aknowledged his identity from that team has scammed people. So that proves nothing. lol no one gives a fuck about this issue but you, take it up with jasin Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: rdnkjdi on October 31, 2014, 06:59:09 PM Quote lol no one gives a fuck about this issue but you, take it up with jasin I was using it to point out the stupidity of the argument "Your proof doesn't matter because dan has made his public identity known" one of the other XC team members used his identity to strengthen his scam. btw I'd say XC falling into oblivion in market cap means people care about the evidence more than the fact that dans identity is known. But hey - keep saying "here's a picture of Dan so STFU about everything period end of story" Seems like the official stance of the XC team. Be mildly interesting to watch you drop from 25 - 30 market cap to 60 - 70 if that's how you're handling this prometheus screenshot debacle. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: Adderral on October 31, 2014, 07:02:46 PM Longandshort? Wasn't it you that fudded in XST and Swift? You are a huge SDC holder and known troll. Why not worry of SDC's supossed zk-snarks and trusted Shadow/cash/scam coin dev to destroy the key that can make millions of coins if not destroyed? Now there is a scam waiting to explode!
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 07:14:47 PM Longandshort? Wasn't it you that fudded in XST and Swift? You are a huge SDC holder and known troll. Why not worry of SDC's supossed zk-snarks and trusted Shadow/cash/scam coin dev to destroy the key that can make millions of coins if not destroyed? Now there is a scam waiting to explode! It is. Now these guys are attacking Dan and the blocknet. When the fuck will you guys get that people in general don't like bullies and douches attacking and trolling everyone. Do you really think that is going to bring SDC its fame and glory? Why not show it of with the fatally flawed ZK-snarks/zerocash with huge trust issue? It's going to be Epic in is FAIL. Trust Bloat crawling TX times. Anyway here is a thread dedicated to all the crap they try to pull and the stuff the Nazi delete and sanitize from their official thread. Besure to arcive the latest bit of their work on there. Here is the nice composite list of all the things longandshort and his SDC scam friends have been doing especially to other coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.520 Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on October 31, 2014, 07:19:46 PM Longandshort? Wasn't it you that fudded in XST and Swift? You are a huge SDC holder and known troll. Why not worry of SDC's supossed zk-snarks and trusted Shadow/cash/scam coin dev to destroy the key that can make millions of coins if not destroyed? Now there is a scam waiting to explode! It is. Now these guys are attacking Dan and the blocknet. When the fuck will you guys get that people in general don't like bullies and douches attacking and trolling everyone. Do you really think that is going to bring SDC its fame and glory? Why not show it of with the fatally flawed ZK-snarks/zerocash with huge trust issue? It's going to be Epic in is FAIL. Trust Bloat crawling TX times. Anyway here is a thread dedicated to all the crap they try to pull and the stuff the Nazi delete and sanitize from their official thread. Besure to arcive the latest bit of their work on there. Here is the nice composite list of all the things longandshort and his SDC scam friends have been doing especially to other coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.520 boohoo, you are just attention seeking now. The questions and answers are in the op, see you at the next scam you are involved in kid! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: IMJim on October 31, 2014, 07:22:13 PM Too many fucking children in this forum! RIDICULOUS
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on October 31, 2014, 07:23:36 PM Quote lol no one gives a fuck about this issue but you, take it up with jasin I was using it to point out the stupidity of the argument "Your proof doesn't matter because dan has made his public identity known" one of the other XC team members used his identity to strengthen his scam. btw I'd say XC falling into oblivion in market cap means people care about the evidence more than the fact that dans identity is known. But hey - keep saying "here's a picture of Dan so STFU about everything period end of story" Seems like the official stance of the XC team. Be mildly interesting to watch you drop from 25 - 30 market cap to 60 - 70 if that's how you're handling this prometheus screenshot debacle. dan already made his statement in this thread. People can choose to believe what they want. Im not sure how you are supposed to refute FUD other than coming in and saying they are false. Do you want Dan to post proof? The onus is still on the Fudders because most of the allegations are poor and really hold no substance since it was Prom that was a fucking retard NOT Dan. He has to make a proper statment that disassociates XC from his discussion because after all, it was him that stirred this up. We wouldnt even be talking about this if it wasnt for him. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 07:24:31 PM Longandshort? Wasn't it you that fudded in XST and Swift? You are a huge SDC holder and known troll. Why not worry of SDC's supossed zk-snarks and trusted Shadow/cash/scam coin dev to destroy the key that can make millions of coins if not destroyed? Now there is a scam waiting to explode! It is. Now these guys are attacking Dan and the blocknet. When the fuck will you guys get that people in general don't like bullies and douches attacking and trolling everyone. Do you really think that is going to bring SDC its fame and glory? Why not show it of with the fatally flawed ZK-snarks/zerocash with huge trust issue? It's going to be Epic in is FAIL. Trust Bloat crawling TX times. Anyway here is a thread dedicated to all the crap they try to pull and the stuff the Nazi delete and sanitize from their official thread. Besure to arcive the latest bit of their work on there. Here is the nice composite list of all the things longandshort and his SDC scam friends have been doing especially to other coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.520 boohoo, you are just attention seeking now. The questions and answers are in the op, see you at the next scam you are involved in kid! It's clear and obvious who the trolling scamcoin supporter is. Shadow and its supporters troll and attack anything that might possible be some kind of threat to their poor precious little baby. It is going to become my mission to out you guys everywhere you troll! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: TrangLee on October 31, 2014, 07:28:43 PM Here is a quick lie of Shadow scam's HTML5 wallet. http://i1357.photobucket.com/albums/q744/EmilioMann/cardboard-testarossa_zps0132341a.jpg
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: WowWtf on November 01, 2014, 02:06:01 AM Here is a quick lie of Shadow scam's HTML5 wallet. http://i1357.photobucket.com/albums/q744/EmilioMann/cardboard-testarossa_zps0132341a.jpg ROFLMAO. ROFLMAO. LMFAO. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: sugarboy321 on November 01, 2014, 10:01:00 AM All of XC trolls in one thread, you guys are missing pookie.
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: CryptoGretzky on November 01, 2014, 11:07:12 AM longandshort... I think you should read this...
http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs201/projects/defamation-and-the-internet/sections/precedent/cases.html You are definitely into the slandering territory and you better hope you have money to pay for the damages. You have caused XC to drop in market cap in the millions due to your fud and slandering. It's all can be measured from the coinmarketcap history. You and spoetnik better come up with some good money to pay for the damages your slandering have caused. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on November 01, 2014, 02:11:09 PM longandshort... I think you should read this... http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs201/projects/defamation-and-the-internet/sections/precedent/cases.html You are definitely into the slandering territory and you better hope you have money to pay for the damages. You have caused XC to drop in market cap in the millions due to your fud and slandering. It's all can be measured from the coinmarketcap history. You and spoetnik better come up with some good money to pay for the damages your slandering have caused. Go and look at the op kid! You are barking up the wrong tree! I asked some questions they got answered..End of story. Now you are here attention seeking like a sick twisted fool.. Shame on you seriously. Better luck next time pretending to say something important though, i wish you luck. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: G-Bert on November 01, 2014, 06:21:03 PM Here is a quick lie of Shadow scam's HTML5 wallet. http://i1357.photobucket.com/albums/q744/EmilioMann/cardboard-testarossa_zps0132341a.jpg Hahaha! (I hold some SDC, but this cracked me up) cheers for the lols in a pathetic thread. :D Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: CryptoJerk on November 01, 2014, 06:36:56 PM you stupid fat slobs spread all this useless FUD but the coins you slander still rocket to the moon daily
you all suck at life the devs you slander still make bank what do you lady boys have to show for your spam and fud(ge) packing? Nothing but a face covered with acne and cheeto residue you have several tabs open at the same time. nudevista, tubegalore, momsontube all whilst you're out here bashing soon to be millionaires get a life you cuckolds Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: buy-black on November 02, 2014, 02:20:13 PM Crypto is dead thank to all of these greedy f****. The level of fud and jealousy is way out of proportion and only comparable to their ambition to get rich by putting down the competition.
Long live XC and Dan! Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: MR1 on November 02, 2014, 03:58:24 PM Pookie and LongAndShort are the shittest people ever !!!
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: buy-black on November 02, 2014, 09:35:02 PM Crypto is dead thank to all of these greedy f****. The level of fud and jealousy is way out of proportion and only comparable to their ambition to get rich by putting down the competition. Long live XC and Dan! Do you want to see my proof ? If you really think its just fud you should first check if its fud. Everything i posted is legit and i could even get Dan into jail if i were living in the US. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: fonzii on November 03, 2014, 02:30:54 AM is xc registrered as a company beacuse if it is you can actually sue the fudders beacuse investers lost money on this
Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: IMJim on November 03, 2014, 02:37:08 AM is xc registrered as a company beacuse if it is you can actually sue the fudders beacuse investers lost money on this Wouldn't that be a nice ending to this debacle:-) Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on November 03, 2014, 02:40:24 AM is xc registrered as a company beacuse if it is you can actually sue the fudders beacuse investers lost money on this I think when XC Inc is established that can happen. Right now it woudn't do much. However there is some serious defemation that has taken place, the majority of it originating from SDC community and it has escalated as more trolls and morons hop on the bandwaggon, just because. Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: Emilyok on November 03, 2014, 02:42:59 AM Cant believe u guys behave like this when they helped bring this blocknet mafia scam to light.
you must have sooo much money invested in it :-[ Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: demgains on November 03, 2014, 02:48:00 AM Cant believe u guys behave like this when they helped bring this blocknet mafia scam to light. you must have sooo much money invested in it :-[ https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FN75mNTa.gif&t=545&c=24M8sXI35Yp3kQ Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: Emilyok on November 03, 2014, 02:57:58 AM peabrained memepic gang at it again
thanks to you dummies i was introduced to shadow and found out what an amazing project it is :D 8) Title: Re: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC Post by: LongAndShort on November 03, 2014, 03:02:57 AM Locking the thread down now its way off topic, thanks for all who contributed.
https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpqIAJrJ.png&t=545&c=75bL8_fQY66HEA Feel free to check out the trhead here if a real project interest you :) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 |
