Bitcoin Forum

new kernel is for sale only 15 buyers....

X11 X13 X15 with 50% more hashrate 7Mh/s on 280x or 10 Mh/s on 290x

see the miner hashing on it
https://i.imgur.com/mGq9I8Q.png


Go to SITE --->
 BitCoin Starter to Get In this (https://bitcoinstarter.com/projects/1125)

Umm.. I'm not going to bother looking, but I'm pretty sure that screenshot is Wolf0's.  ::)

yes it is

if the campaign doesn't fund fully , everyone gets refunded, its an escrow with bitcoinstarter

Just wait a while. It will be released for free. No need to pay 

These tales have long heard about supermajner, a miner in the Studio  ;)

no he will never release it, unless hes paid ;)

This is SCAM, screan is Wolf 100% ;)

This should be crowd funded by the whole x11 community...

not really if everyone gets it its useless, as diff will go up...

only reason we are limiting is so these miners will get the edge...

not sure what this is, but these lower temps are scarry ? what hardware is this ?

this is no scam , this thread is for wolf's kernel dude.. ;) always was

Did I understand it right - Wolf0 sells his kernels for only 3 BTCs ?

no not 3btc.. 45 BTC...


https://bitcoinstarter.com/projects/1125

is to raise the 45 BTC within 15 people @ 3btc each... code will be giving to these 15 guys ( or 3 if they go @ 15 btc, or 1 if he buys all shares to it)

so basically out of 9000 miners approx , there will be 15 with an edge from wolfs miner

holy shi.... im in canada and cant get those that cold, you up in alaska ? these watercooled ? even idling i get 60's and they freshly pasted

So 3 BTC gets me the kernels + source code?

How much for just the kernels without the source code? Or are they the same? Sorry, I have no clue.

If I do pay, how long before I get the kernels? I have zero interest in the source code, wouldn't have a clue what to do with it to try and improve it.

kernel is source, you get the X11Wolfy.cl that you put in /kernels folder, you can mod it if you want, there is no non-source code, its not encrypted , meaning yeah,

so yes for 3 btc , youll have the kernel, if we have 14 more guys, but it will go pretty fast.

Ok. I'll have to figure out if it's worth it or not for my rigs. (About 50x 7970/280x + 20x 290/290x)

I would probably be convinced if I could pay 3BTC now without having to wait for 14 other people to get the kernels.

pretty easy math... even @ 40% increase,  its like you added 20 * 7970 and 8 * 290'x with 0 power cost lol

Just a note.

When a kernel is up for sale, its usualy because the Dev knows/suspects that a new/better/free one is under development.

hahaha 45btc???
you moron what are u thinking with yourself??

I don't know at what value you estimate gpu dev work in general, but the general feeling among us is "not a lot"...
I don't understand why when many are making substantial money with "our" work, it should just be equivalent to a few beers (if people feel like giving... you did pay for your card you didn't tell amd, nvidia, I will pay if I am happy with the cards... )
Do you know many developper around working for a beer and a soup ?  ;D

on a different note, Ignition75 tried to organize a crowdfunding project to rise fund for optimized x11 kernels which would benefit everyone... and didn't get much success so far (you can probably still pledge however...) too many people just expect free stuff... coming out of nowhere.

So don't complain you did it to yourself (and stop expecting free stuff... while nobody is giving anything back)

beer and donate is okay dude and i always support devs
but 45btcs ??????? wtf
for kernels that may not work with newer drivers  or may not work on all systems????
its insane price for kernels for algos that no one knows how long they will be profitable(small profits after asics)

If you look at his fan speed, you might think that it is actually very hot if he lower down the speed...

yeah but thats not the kernel in question that a poster that posted HIS configs....

no it issnt, this kernel was not for sale, i kind of offered him the possibility and after thinking about it , he said yeah 15K USD i would sell....

its not 45 BTC, its 3 BTC each for 15 guys...... if you have 1 rig, this is NOT FOR YOU.. if you have 10-20-30+ rigs...youll ROI in 10 days

will pay 1btc for *.cl but only to Wolf0
resellers of kernel?
hmmm, fck them  :o
hate pals who are not implementing something usefull but trading with another`s labour

dude i'm not reselling anything i'm working with WOLF to SELL it, i'm the guy making the campaign, the money goes 100% to him.

now if you have something usefull to say go for it.

ps i hate people that judge too quickly or lack the information to make good calls.... ask before you make a judgment.

No one will ever buy this way. Look up "prisoner's dilemma". Better find different way to do this.

All projects needs funding. 50% is not fast enough. Nicehash is currencly only paying 0.1132 BTC/GH/Day. TO ROI you need a miner that is 300% faster.

as i said this isa not for the small rigs owners, if you have 10+ rigs, youll roi in no time

to the math whatmine.com try 200 m/s vs 300 m/s

3 btc by person. i think thats a lot. for people with 5-10 gpu isnt profitable at this moment. to be possible to refund 3btc i have to wait 6 or 8 without electricity cost. Am i right

We could split it up to 1.5 btc ,

;D lol business doesn't seem to be good

since you helped Wolf0, you could have come up with a better estimate for a price... (or lat least one which sells)

he wanted 15,000 USD, thats 45 BTC... cant do 45 times 1 btc and surely not 15000, times 1$

the problem is that people ready to buy it at 3btc (some mid/big farm, I guess), won't want to wait that other big farms get the software too, because they lose their advantages over the competition (which is not the swarm of small miners...).

The problem is that this is a kernel pre-order. Hardware pre-orders are bad enough.

Well, this is too bad. The only people for whom this makes sense to spend 3 BTC are big mining farms. And odds are extremely high that once the 15 bidders get it, a "leak" will happen somewhere among the 15 so that within days the new software will be available to pretty much everyone. (For example, such big farms will have employees who mine on the side, and they will be strongly tempted to install it on their own machines, and then share with friends who see the results, and so on from there - I really only expect this to take a matter of days).

So in the end we all get it, and the mining farms will not recoup their 3 BTC in a short time before everyone has the same advantage. Plus there is the very real risk that other coders are making improvements as we speak, that will cut into or eliminate the advantage presented here. So what mining farm operator wants to take this kind of risk? Better to just wait til everyone has it...

45 BTC ?! GTFO !

Do you guys realize the dangerous precident this is setting ?

Maybe I should create new algo/ kernel, then sucker the community into volunteering their hashes during the beta phase. THEN.. after it goes live, those very same suckers will be stuck mining with whatever table scraps my greedy fat ass decides they will be allowed to have.

MAN ! I'm a fucking genius ! ::)

45btc good price for this kernel dude :)
i wanna buy this kernel soon.

The price is insane. I have a decent size farm spread out on multiple locations but even 3 BTC is too high to be worth while. Try 3BTC amongst the 15 buyers and it would be a realistic price.

get it soon, and do some reviews.

Wow, spend a few hours at a keyboard, get a new Hyundai..

Seems worth it to me.   ;D

few hours at a keyboard  ::)  
(I won't mention the fact that many around are working in IT, lots of huyndai are getting bought by people spending time at a keyboard)

this is with these sort of comment, that makes me wonder if open sourcing (and basically sharing code) is really a good idea at all...
looks to me the kind of person, I wouldn't feel bad to see running with a cpu on a gpu coin  ;D


edit: for info many made enough profit with gpu miner code to buy many lambo... (so if the coder can get at least a Hyundai...)
and considering the general trend with p&d scam in altcoin... this looks more like work than anything else happening in altcoin

You took that completely wrong. 

I work at a keyboard for 50 hours a week as a job.  If I could do side work, massage code, test, and sell, I'd be all over it!!

Did you bork.. err.. forget to port solo mining on this one too ?

Yes, you and a select few have it right now. Mining away.

Meanwhile, if I want it I have to pay BTC3 and wait possibly up to 37 days to either get it or be refunded. So far no one has pledged which leads me to believe that I'll be waiting a long time if I do cough up the BTC.

Such is the way that the free market works..  Supply and demand.

If you really wanted it, you could buy them all, or likely make a straight up private offer for like half the quantity and own it exclusively.

For this to be worth 3 BTC, someone would have to be mining 6 BTC (at current rates) in the future for it to pay off, before the higher kernel became widespread or other changes nullified the advantage.

Yesterday the best X11 pool, YAAMP, earned .00016 BTC/Mhash, and things have been declining steadily. Let's assume they flatline at this level though. To earn 1 BTC in a month at this rate you'd need to be running a rig farm of ~208 Mhash. At this level you'd ROI in 6 months.

But we all know how steeply the rates keep declining. I'd want to have at least a 400-500 Mhash mining operation to even consider this. Given the kernel won't be available for weeks, even that seems awfully optimistic. I think the odds the rest of the mining community remains at the same rate as today are low as well.

hmm 4 days str8 at NeoScrypt   3341   0.0234 GH/s   3.6192 BTC/GH/Day  351%   3.9730 BTC/GH/Da

thats 3.6 btc/gih a day...
not sure where you selling your  stuff.....

Also for all the rest


well this "KERNEL" has been up and running fro more then 30 days and no LEAK its currently leased to 1 customer for over that amount

Does this provide a 50% increase to neoscrypt as well? The thread title just says X11/13/15. I used the Poolpicker figure for best pool. Presumably there might be something better out there on any given day, but I doubt someone could consistently beat what turns out retrodictively to be the fastest pool on poolpicker.

not neoscrypt only X based algos...

I can guarantee you, miners aren't making 'substantial' sums of money mining. You'd need A LOT of cards to make anything substantial now days (when algos are profitable), most people are still negative over their entire time mining (loans).

$1200 isn't possible for the majority of miners. The adjustment in difficulty people who can afford the kernel will make will be ridiculous (reads only really big miners can afford this).

50% increase in performance wont pay itself off anytime soon as well at 3 BTC, unless you have a LOT of GPUs and only on good days. This is going to effectively gate the community and turn it into another ASIC project, where only big spenders with a lot of money can turn a profit and make more money.

Did I miss where you were magically selling a neoscrypt kernel? Did you even bother to check how much 1gh of neoscrypt actually is? That's about 3,800 280x GPUs!

if those kernel cost 0.1btc you would get a great bunch of BTCs before it is leaked. That's a very poor comercial strategy that you made.
This is the kind of stuff community doesn't need.

yeah sure  ;D
Except that if someone pay 0.1btc (35$usd), he can leak it without losing too much, while with 3btc(>1000$usd) you would have to be really generous to leak it, and to be honest I haven't seen that kind of generosity on crypto  ;D
Giving away >1000$usd + losing your advantage, at the moment there isn't the kind of profitability which would allow someone to do that.

edit: the people who have shown that sort of generosity are probably gpu devs themselves by giving out stuff for which they never received any donation ;D

Sure... And why does he care if it gets leaked? He should only care about selling it.

3BTC per sale isn't going to drive anything. If it was $35 I would probably shell out for it to get it a few weeks to a month before everyone else.

Honestly though I'd much rather have a more efficient kernel watt/hash then anything. Most people are oblivious to power usage and rely on old data... Most don't even own a meter... Most leave their miners on while mining super negative because 'it makes money', and thus is our problem of x11 costing 40% more in power then it makes.

Yep. I did the math again yesterday. The drop in oil prices means propane is cheaper despite the little ice age in my area. I'll earn about $2.50 on Neoscrypt today, and power will cost about the same based on comments others have made about power draw on Neoscrypt. (I've burned out 2 Kill-a-Watt meters and won't splurge on another at this point). The value of the heat produced is about $1.00 at this point. Not really worth it considering depreciating prices on what I can get selling the GPU's. So yesterday I ordered a 4K monitor through Purse, and expect to be playing my first games on the rig soon...

??? Are you saying that this new x11 kernal has solo mining disabled aswell ?

lol.. You have essentially hi-jacked coins with your rigged kernals.. and you want me to "put it to rest" ? This is on top of having your blacklisted site and nsfw .pngs imposed on us.

hmm.. I'm gonna need to have a smoke and think about that one. ::)

Earlier you claimed that Slix did it. Now you're saying it is an impossibility. Who is Slix and how did he "do it" to your OpenCL kernel ?

Whatever the reason, we can rule out sgminer as 4.2.2 yields the same result.

http://img.techpowerup.org/141102/SG5NEO.jpg

The bigger elephant in the room is saying, "why is Hippie Tech the ONLY one who gives a flying fuck (about the ninja launched algo, security flags ect.) !?"

Enough with the name calling. Just answer/ explain the damn questions.

This is OUR FTC. Got it ?

my man Wolf0 doesnt sell such cheap - pay 45BTC or get scammed

Why are you talking about neoscrypt in a thread dedicated to xN kernels?

not sure about what you are talking, but stop buying crappy thing that unknown people advertise...  ;D (not speaking about wolf0 kernel)
Actually it would be possible to disable solomining at kernel level (well solomining would be possible, however you wouldn't find any block or a lot less),
by only selecting low difficulty share...

actually I know only one kernel which didn't work on solo, it was hefty (for mjollnir coin) from reorder

Solo mine something with his x11/13/15 kernel, then get back to me. ::)

edit

We want to see screenies, or it didn't happen. lol

Fucken 3 BTC to get access to this? I your kidding me? I am all about getting some money for your work, but all your doing is cornering the market even more because people who are normal miners no way in hell can afford the 3 BTC. Lets say I make .012 BTC a day mining right now, getting worse by the day, by the time you have enough for it, good luck seeing any return.


IMO, this model sucks. All your doing is catering to the big miners. I think most would be happy to pay something for it and would keep it under wraps because they get a advantage.

HippieTech, can you read?

In the screenshot you showed, it says:

"Please check the details from the list below of the servers you have input"
"Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to add a port, or have not set up workers"

It's hard to understand why you think your misconfiguration is somehow Wolf0's fault..

Even if Wolf's kernel had some intentional or unintentional code to prevent solo mining, it would not show up like that! The kernel is not even loaded at that point where sgminer is just trying to find a live pool. There simply is no way to make sgminer fail like that from kernel code.

may i add no one has kernel yet, .... only wolf.... and do the guy who cant connect to a stratum.. got back to design mode ;)

This is solo mining, not rocket science. ;)

Its not hard to understand once you try solo'n with any of his kernels.

You could easily debunk me by doing so.

gl :)

I can solo mine with the Wolf0 neoscrypt.cl with cgminer-3.7.7.bNeoscrypt.  I cannot with any sgminer.  I get the same error message.

What error message are you getting?  I solo-mine a lot of things with a lot of sgminer variants. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.msg9557908#msg9557908 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.msg9557908#msg9557908)
I didn't think my post was unclear.  I said the same error message.

I would buy for like $50, ROI on 3btc ain't happening unless you have china farms

...which is the only people this will benefit. Massive rig owners who maybe make $100 a day, on a good day right now.

You wanna do freelance coding? Cool... just think of your market.


BTW... I had two kill-a-watt meters burn out too... I ended up buying a different brand. I think kill-a-watts are full of shit based on how often I hear them burning out. The off brand china meter I got is still working fine.

3 btc is greedy.

3.7.7.b isn't his. ;D

trolololol..

Tyvm for confirming my findings. Plz post a screenie or better yet the log file.

I don't follow you.  Of course he didn't write cgminer 3.7.7bNeoscrypt.  But he did write the .cl which works fine with it.  And it solo mines.  So what is your point exactly?

Killawatts are not meant to be permanent installations. Use it and then remove it.

Where were you when I burnt my 2 out to tell me this? lol.... that and I guess having it plugged into the outlet with the power strip and 4 miners hooked on it did not do any wonders for it either lolollll... pooof!!!

Oh.. good to know. I thought someone else wrote that 280x/140 khash version. :) And ya.. it solos.. but did you find any blocks ? I spent over a week solo'n UFO and FTC while the diff was low and had zero luck.

The point is.. I'm looking for a reason.. ANY reason to trust this guy. So far all I'm seeing is greed and strong indicators that he (and/or the group he represents) is trying to manipulate and control neoS, x11, x13 ect.

I've found tons of Phoenixcoin with his .cl and the cgminer-3.7.7.bNeoscrypt.  As for trust, well, he's given this kernel to us.  What have you given us other than FUD?

Yeah, the instructions just gave a maximum wattage to stay under. They didn't say to not leave it plugged in. I was running X11 at around 1200 watts when mine died. It was rated a good bit higher.

I doubt many of us wanted to go through the hassle of unplugging them all the time because that would mean powering down our miners every time we were done doing some testing/evaluations. Wonder how many people also blew out two kill-a-watts (or more?)

It would say that on the box if that were the case. All the more reason they're crap. My chinese meter stays plugged in 24/7 and works perfectly fine.

 thread gone stupid ::)

Thread was never smart to begin with :)

well... someone was selling a Ferrari in the first posts and in the last people are asking about gas mileage  ;D
(and in the middle people who can't afford ferrari complaining)

It is true?? Some real screenshot available?
Is price 3 btc?

Worse, we're complaining about our broken fuel gages while the poor guy is trying to sell his Ferrari. :-)

;D ;D

Shows you how many more people can relate to power issues then they can to 3BTC for something that will obsolete their miners because they can't afford it.

this thread is going off topic, wolf has a kernel that is for sale, stay on topic ;)

if you can't manage 3btc then this thread aint for you.. its targeted at a few to a dozen farms or people with 10 rigs +

Nice, what clocks for 10 MH/s?

:|
gpu will melt with this clock/volt

Is this still available?

I've neither the time or inclination to do the reading for a specific error message that you could just as easily repeat.  Sorry.  Nothing wrong with repeating information for clarity.

 

Do you have more than one for sale?

small rig with 3x 7950, how much just x11?  :) I could pay $50 or so in btc, i make like 0.001/day

You know putting aside the whole ginormous BTC bounty on this thing, why don't you do what other kernel developers do and just add a dev mine? It's fair as long as it's advertised. Claymore has to be making out pretty good right now at 2.5% and he was at 5% for a really long time.

I haven't given up djm!

I understand Triplef's argument that if everyone gets the new miner the diff will increase, but it also stops the privileged few running away with most of the profits.

With the alt-coin scene going through a big consolidation, levelling the playing field could be the shot in the arm the mining scene needs.

I still firmly believe if marketed right, the entire community would donate a lot more than 45 BTC for these kinds of improvements...

but...


Nobody pledged so far

You guys are doing it all wrong...

People are very generous if you have something they want and you present it right.

Kristov Atlas raised a lot of donations from the DRK community by saying "The more you donate, the more time I can spend on the Darksend code review".

Over 1 week I think he got 1100 DRK when it was worth $6.

No point in doing that because the hashrate would increase for everybody and it wouldn't be worth it

This is with this kind of behavior expect less and less people open sourcing anything.
At some point we all get tired of cheap fucks...

that could also benefit drk network... (but yes for individual miner, it doesn't change much)

Or is it that we "cheap fucks" have grown weary of all the ninja launched coins and algos that you greedy fiatheads can't seem to get enough of. ::)

miners made profits of the ninja launched coins too and new algo coins and usually when we open-source a miner, something which was profitable to mine to us (because we are fiathead with a few brain cells) becomes totally unprofitable, so why should we opensource anything if nobody shows any gratitude (meaning sending a few % of what they mined... ).
It has became clear that the altcoin community is very ungrateful, and unless forced to pay that % fee, they won't give anything at all..

When you buy a car, do you get tires or gasoline for free ? (if yes where are you living ?  ;D)
I mean people have been buying gpu by pack of ten, but when it comes to gives something to software developper, nobody... electricity is expensive so software dev is cut off  ;D.

I was contacted once by some dude to make a monero miner for free just to prevent Claymore from collecting any fee...
(the joy of programming exists... but they are limits)

Djm I don't know where all this hate of miners is coming from, but they're definitely not making money right now. Look at a profit calculator and then scale it up a bit and if you don't have a plug watt meter, buy one. Using GPUs to mine you're earning about -30% just by running the things.

Only ones making money off coins launching are people playing the Nicehash miner graveyard.

That aside, I'm not sure why everyone overlooked the part where I said 'put in a dev mine'. Other developers have done it and it works fine as long as you tell people it's there. Claymore is a good example of that. If you feel your work is worth money, do more then say 'give me money'. With a 50% increase in hashrate you'd have everyone on board even with a 5% dev fee, which is basically every x11/x13/x15 AMD GPU miner, funneling coins through you regardless of the fact that we wouldn't be making more money and this would actually be worse for us as everyone would then be using 15% more power.

I don't understand where this high and mighty attitude is coming from though. It's just like you want to dangle tidbits in front of miners that aren't having the best of times right now as a big 'fuck you' because we apparently didn't thank you enough for free work you did... for... free...

That's completely putting aside that miners don't need more speed at any cost right now, they need efficiency.

Hate is a big word, I am just saying.

Only a few people donate while the vast majority is just expecting stuff for free,
and each time a gpu dev ask something for his service, then he is a jerk or an asshole or a hater, this is getting old...

Why are you telling me this rather than telling to your electricity company you won't pay because it wasn't profitable enough
(probably because they would sue you and cut down your power line  ;D ... but beside that ?)

again, that's always the same thing, each one gpu dev complain, he has an attitude  ::)

just an example, xcn miner was downloaded around 200x (which isn't a lot actually) got donations from max 10~15ppl so profitability or not it is always the same story (and every gpu dev and dev at large will tell you the exact same story, but as I am also a bit of a troll so I talk a lot more about it...)

regarding: dev mine: well it is based on opensource so basically releasing only the exe (which some people will disassemble to remove the dev fee, as it happens to Girino) is forbidden so basically it would require to rewrite everything from scratch, encrypt the exe so that very very bad players don't temper with it... etc...)

crypto is the far west and we aren't the bad guys... we still respect a few rules...

and it is probably the same people who donated...  ;D

I'm very close to banning all GPU devs from releasing anything until we've sat down and worked out a way everybody wins  ;)

3 btc for 50% more of hashrate is a joke, we can give 25% of hashrate for 1 year for example or 0.5 btc. A lot of times is best a cheap price and a lot of customers than expensive price and a few customers, would be nice that we all raise our mining gpu

That's not miners, that's other kernel makers in the community. Miners generally don't have the expertise to do something like that nor would they share it with everyone else if they did. As Djm said he had someone contact him to ask him to remove the fee from Claymore, Djm being another kernel developer... I suppose a miner as well, but a couple cards isn't what I consider a miner.

Perhaps making things more proprietary would be helpful then, but that's up to you. If you want money for you work the best way to do it is with a fee. That makes it accessible to people with little to no money, but can donate hashing power and it scales up.


Then put a dev fee on it. If you feel you need money for your work, charge for it. Don't yell at and hate on people for not 'giving enough' when you're looking for donations.


Lower power usage, dev fee!


BTW if the dev fee is extortion like 25% you're going to get a lot of hate and well deserved.

no matter what you ask, it is always too much... and people will do everything to not pay it...
(but yes it is a solution)
by the way, if a coin dev is interested there is a big opportunity to makes big bucks here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=872542.0
don't wait too long that opportunity won't last  ;D

that says it all, CLONE me a coin for 5$.....

you do know that 50% of miners are china

china has no copyright concept whatsoever , it's not even a word in chinese i assume.

you know that they reverse engineer most of what they make ? even from themselves ?

if you own a big manufacturer, you know having your products made in china will have them copy it and rebrand it but you HAVE to, else you will sell your product 40% higher and therefore not sell any at all, since they will sell your product rebranded KISO or something on aliexpress for 40% less...

You all want to know how to make a fortune ?

Get 30K get nice videos, rent a warehouse, make a nice site, call it butterfly or knc, have people send you 40K at a time till you get 10 million,

take the 10 million send 4 to china to make an ASIC,  when they produce late ( coz they are mining with it ) they will eventually ship it back to you , then you get 300 ASICS worth shit coz DIFF tripppled by the time you got them but still you mine with them and make a huge cloud mining op, make back the 4 mill you payed the chineese, netting 10 mill , and ship to the retail clients that paid for all this in first case.

rinse, repeat, people are greedy, but also stupid, WOLF is not stupid, HE understood the code, ( cryptography IS NOT EASY) proof of that is NO ONE did the optimizations HE did.
if he puts a fee in the miner, it WILL BE EXTRACTED, netting in a 0 profit for hard work,

For me you have no excuse, if you had made a bid to release the code I would understand but this is worse than the mafia. Some people lose money with his rigs and don´t have any opportunity to win because your price is fucking crazy

Of course, and you try to sell for 3 btc, everybody like business, not only you and your friend trying to sell me the code for 1 btc ;)

say the guy who is trying to scam people by selling "his" copy of Wolf0  ;D
No matter, what is your point you made yours by trying to sell something you don't have...
anything else you could say after that has absolutely no value.... (calling other "mafia" while trying to con people is highly laughable)

I recieved an offer from "mamator" for selling wolf0's kernel fo 0.5BTC , asked him/her which exact kernel he/she is offering.. and there is no answer...

One person try to sell me the code for 1 btc in miningrigrentals with escrow but the people say this at him and don´t want to sell me, for my part, I´m out of this game.

If anyone wants a cheap rig, contact me

Do you want the users who make this? the price is 3 btc

a real one ? Or a non-existing one ?  ;D

I can provide you with the fake photos of your rigs (well the photo aren't fake, per se )  for 1btc  ;D

Yes so unless you have 100 GPUs with free electricity the 3btc is not worth the 50% speed increase, just do the math!

I would agree with this.

Wolf0, out of curiosity, what's the power usage increase alongside the speed increase?

Well done  ;)

You've accelerated the death of many shitcoins that had to die anyway, the market needed to consolidate and work like this has a regressive effect on the ecosystem.

Are you an idiot?, go to mininrigrentals and rent my rig, It´s a shame because english is not my native language and is very difficult for me to explain my feelings for you, ass licker.

no worry, ass licker should do it  ;D
(however, when someone try to scam, I guess ass kicker might be better)

edit: And we are all fed up with all the scammer which are around and making a fun and profitable experience a nightmare...

Looks to me like mamator needs some public shaming.

http://imgur.com/meLicfd (http://imgur.com/meLicfd)

LOL!

BUSTED!

And for what it's worth, mamator also sent the same message to me. He's a two bit criminal scammer. Someone should mention that to MRR, they might be interested. I'll be happy to add my screenshot to the list if it's any help.

I think you need to rewrite the kernals to compute 2 or more hashes within the same thread. But then you need to rewrite sqminer as well.

I'm waiting for Wolf0miner.   8)

It's just great to see the community support

"Goal: 45.00000000 Ƀ

Nobody pledged so far

22 days to go

- See more at: https://bitcoinstarter.com/projects/1125#sthash.vr7bRvZT.dpuf"

lol

/sarcasm

But wolf has a point.. He has been working hard to push the hashrate 50%. The man deserves some credit and coins.
Wolf:  rewrite sgminer from scratch and go claymore :) You are good, but not Elite.

The author of the shader code used in battlefield 4 (Frostbite) is a member of the group that released this

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=25778

Rendering on hardware from 1992 @50mhz

Don't want to start preaching, but you use sgminer, linux, darkwallet, firefox etc.
How much did you pay for those? Did you donate? (Did I?) :)

World does not work that way I'm sorry to say. In a decade or so you will understand what I've just said.

The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations  ;D
 
(the others are funded through publicity and I don't think you can use them to make money at least not directly...).
again why anybody should help you make money for free especially if you don't give anything back ?
I still don't understand because I don't think anybody runs 10 or gpu's just for free heat and noise.
If it is your case, then I apologize, because in that case you really don't have to donate.

We are definitely not your slaves, we have no reason to work for you for nothing. If you can't understand that sorry...

I have never said "you have to ..." about anything. So this is a bit out of place. We are just having conversation right?

So to make myself clear:
1. Whatever you choose to do or not is up to you.
2. I myself have done work at times, say developed software, and donated it to public, at other times I have sold software that I developed (mostly with service). That makes me neither a good person or a bad one,  nor a slave.
3. Let's assume you use firefox or linux or whatever GNU/BSD/MIT/etc. software you may use. Are the people that developed it your slaves? No they are not. They have, in their view and mine, donated their time and expertise to the betterment of mankind and that's it.
4. You may regard them as slaves, if we follow your analogy from above, to have done free work for you or just plain stupid to work for free, but trust me they are neither because they choose to do whatever they did.
5. You are a slave when you pay taxes, as this relationship you did not choose and is the one you will have difficulty getting out of. You owe whatever they tell you, not what you negotiated.

and finally 6. There is a particular reason why I got interested in X11 a week ago. Namely I act as an adviser to a third party that wan't to look into developing a X15 coin so I thought I'll look into X11 first as it seems more mature. So what would your recommendation be if you were in my shoes? Should they go with X15 or look for something else with a more leveled play-field?

Am I making sense to you?

p.s. If you and Wolf0 post your Darkcoin address I will donate to you just because I enjoy these conversations immensely...

I wouldn't go either with any of the x algo, and would probably go to other things, or actually make something new...
would rather go to some variation of m7 (but there they are too many thing in parallel)

actually lyra2 is interesting because you can mix various hash together... (but you might end up running at 5kH/s rather easily though...  ;D)
that could make them less interesting to port on asic or fpga


btw here my drk address: XxmLrr12Ah5nPcTEASUrdkPY1k8vYujVDJ

Nobody pledged because most X11 are useless coins. The only good coin out there with a decent market cap is Darkcoin.

So unless Litecoin converts to X11, its not worth it.

honestly I hope they won't  ;D (considering they are doing rather well with asic... and that I have some ltcgear shares...)

M7 looks interesting. I don't know why authors have decided to multiply results of individual hash functions instead of concatenating. Would this be case to use concurrent kernel execution?

However I like Lyra2 more. It seems to be a natural evolution of scrypt pow function. I read Vertcoin is adopting Lyra2 just in time to avoid being overtaken by new generation of scrypt ASICs. Have you done any work on that one?

p.s. I've sent you (XxmLrr12Ah5nPcTEASUrdkPY1k8vYujVDJ) and Wolf0 (XomK7Ghw8asmWfwfNWGBxzzLR937nDCeRw) my daily test run of about 0.5DRK split in 2 :)

i believe this will help too

http://www.filedropper.com/optmizedsgminerkernels

kernel folder with optimized kernels (not + 50%, but an increase none the less)
also included, binary file for tahiti chips

Happy hashing!

Do you have any more info like where you got these, any hidden commands to mine at a different address, expected hash rate?

Your account is brand new so people will need a bit of convincing before trusting your files.

it's open source, see for yourself, if you don't trust it, don't touch it.

looks promising, let me give it a spin... ...not much of a difference although implementation in .cl files is different.

Well, seems there is a positive difference after all about 3%....hope it's not a placebo.

Wolf0 nobody told you you're shit. At least not that I'm aware of.

Hold on, hold on. What the hell is going on in here? If a binary was posted(or not, depending on if a miner is released or just the .CL kernel), I could've extracted the kernel.

Yes but the binary was never posted and will remain private.

yeah, that's probably also the reason for this way of proceeding... since it shows that dev fee won't work... unless you come up with some good protection and crypting method...

How does one extract a kernel from a bin file?  I've tried 7-zip and mounting the bin file with WinCDEmu but no luck.  I'm not trying to extract .cl's from any of Wolf0's bins, I do not have them, and I fully support him trying to sell his work.  I have a bin made with a previous driver that I want to work with. 

You should use a "dissassembler". I't a technical term I know. :)

ask Claymore  ;D

Disassemble fun  ;D

http://www.filedropper.com/bins

X11, X15 .bins

Let the killing begin!

Happy Hashing!  8)

went the horse into the river...  ;D

faster kernel from somebody with a username like LovesToShare and a total of 5 posts, no red flags here :)

edit: seems safe... but 100% rejects. and how about getting back on topic, this is about wolfs kernel and if you actually have something to share then create your own thread...

At least put Pitcairng and so the set will be full :D.

actually instead of hacking into bin, if people was adding cgminer algo (heavycoin and some others), that would probably benefit to a lot more people and would probably be a better use of your time (not mentioning learning yourself opencl)

The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one)
Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he  sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here.
Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! :)

how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_  ;D )

Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage!
I will publish interesting things soon! :)
Anyway, this kernel&bins are pretty close to the genuine ones! :)

getting lost... by genuine one do you mean the standard one or the Wolf0 (nobody saw yet) ?

I had in mind that Wolf0 is a step ahead already! :)

Haha!

Did someone lose his little extra on the side business?

It sure seems so  ;D

This sounds bad! If you are not him where the hell you know what he doing from?
What about this screenshot? - http://imgur.com/BYwdPxx

Took a long time to post that "screenshot"

Congratulations, you're good with Photoshop  8)

Oh, aren't you the one who sold to the user "mamator"? (The one who is sending pm's to everyone?)
Funny how you're trying to clear your name so badly.

Keep it up bozo  ;)

This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those?

Anyway thanks for sharing...

Also I'm buying lunch if you stop by...

Looking at bin file size, I'd say they forced some parts of the code not to "unroll" as the whole bin is 1/2 size.
I'd love to look at their .cl to see what they've done.
In the performace side, 7950 is running at 4.9MH/s up from 3.0, 280X is about 6.4 up from 3.9
(on stock clocks. btw I have a problem with trixx and recent amd drivers, namely on 280x i seem to be able to set gpu clock and memclock, but gpu-z still shows stock clocks. Afterburner is even worse. Do you know what's with that?)
and 290X/X2 is at 8.7 per core up from 5.6 all on stock clocks.

Not bat at all I'd say. I will have to setup tomorrow to measure power usage...

Are these yours? Have you looked at the .bin files?

p.s. what's with the Trixx and latest drivers? I cannot seem to be able to set gpu and mem clocks....

here is copypaste from my so called management dashboard: you can guess the cards by their respective hash rates except the first one @ 720kH/s which is an old 5770 I used for testing.


Row: 1
Rack: 1    Rack: 2    Rack: 3    Rack: 4    Rack: 5
Shelf:1
Name    bit.siopti.com
IP-Port    bit.siopti.com-4028
Uptime    2w 1d 0h 11m 50s
kH/s    704.2
HW_Errors    0
Pool_Rej%    0.1872
Dev_Rej%    0.1872
Blocks    0
Utility    1.3072
Device    Temper    Fan    kH/s
GPU0    72.0C    -1    720.3
   
Shelf:1
Name    coin.siopti.com
IP-Port    coin.siopti.com-4028
Host DOWN!
   
Shelf:1
Name    giga.siopti.com
IP-Port    giga.siopti.com-4028
Uptime    0w 0d 2h 36m 30s
kH/s    20854.8
HW_Errors    0
Pool_Rej%    0.0957
Dev_Rej%    0.0957
Blocks    0
Utility    40.0136
Device    Temper    Fan    kH/s
GPU0    61.0C    1430    6076.8
GPU1    72.0C    1702    6437.0
GPU2    73.0C    1633    4848.3
GPU3    70.0C    1203    4908.7
   
Shelf:1
Name    lite.siopti.com
IP-Port    lite.siopti.com-4028
Uptime    0w 0d 2h 33m 6s
kH/s    17753.4
HW_Errors    0
Pool_Rej%    0.2752
Dev_Rej%    0.2752
Blocks    0
Utility    30.7657
Device    Temper    Fan    kH/s
GPU0    57.0C    -1    8683.0
GPU1    58.0C    -1    8671.9
   
Shelf:1
Name    mega.siopti.com
IP-Port    mega.siopti.com-4028
Uptime    0w 0d 2h 40m 10s
kH/s    18467.9
HW_Errors    0
Pool_Rej%    0.2519
Dev_Rej%    0.2519
Blocks    0
Utility    32.1401
Device    Temper    Fan    kH/s
GPU0    70.0C    1253    6111.6
GPU1    70.0C    1434    6121.0
GPU2    62.0C    1374    6151.5

Well seems this has been in the wild for a while. File modification date is Nov 18th. Anyway you're also invited for a lunch. We can discuss X11 and "other things in littérature"

I am inserting the kernels in sgminer 5.0 (in the kernels folder) and I am also copying bin files in the main sgminer folder.

Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?


@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak.
If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours.
 Hope that others think the same as i do.

Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_-



Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.

Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.

Thanks for the help. It works now 5.9 on 7950 @ 1100/1600

Don't worry, we don't expect a lot, but yourself don't expect anything which could be profitable to you...  also don't complain when a gpu dev rape a new coin... as we don't expect anything from you there is no reason to share with you (ie: in that case you are just the competition...)  and in that case, we will just release new stuff when it has become unprofitable to us... (well it is a lose-lose situation... but more for you than for us in the no-donation basis).

I think you don't understand the implication (for you) of what you wrote...  ;D
Because we really don't have to share anything at all...

sooner or later anyway someone spit  ;)

well for starters, why the fuck did he get a version ?

so leak was 100% sure, if you sell soemthing to 1 guy your sure he will be a gready fuck and try to fuck you over.

first mistake was wolf sending 1 guy the source for reasons i ignore, the rest is human nature.

also says alot about the guy as we know who it is,

now for the rest of you , well, the idiot just fucked up, since now diff will rize fast and all this be useless...

so i guess we can stop this thread now

To be honest, that's why I am reluctant to even sell day zero algo... because we all know that someone will try to resell it (even if it is a crappy exe...)
actually the best way to operate is to do like primegpu, release the soft with a licence number attached to a specific hardware... (but we can't get further away from open-source  ;D), personnally I would even add something to make it revocable, in case he tries to temper with it...   ;D
and that would be a lot of pain to develop... (far away of anybody interest in the field, which is still algorithmic as far as I am concerned...)

please donate to wolf,

im setting up a pool to automaticaly give a % to wolf , multipool , profit port

I sent some satoshis to this address: 1Jp2R7dF9gYr872FkXiap2MaYaHNEfwWhZ
It is not a lot, some bottles of beer ;D, but that is all what i can do now.

It is my fake account, i doesn't want to show my main acc for some reasons.
Recently i did smth at this forum, it was opensource, and i had a donation address and i thankful for all who donated. But for most of people opensource == free. Sad, but true.

I just hope that in the future, may be month, may be in a year, you will write an article about your optimisations. I and others will appreciate it.
Sorry for my mistakes.

Nice.

R9 280x(tahiti): 6.450MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
9970(tahiti): 5,9MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
6990(Caymang): 4,1MHASH at standard clocks. with 2 threads

With 8 threads the rig is crashing.

Donation is comming tomorrow.

My file name is darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0, yours is l8, can I copy that l8 file?

@wolf0

what coin is that address wolf0 BTC/DRK or what

I get some

[16:59:00] Rejected 0250b0ee Diff 0.432/0.040 GPU 4  (Share above target.)

I've had a lot of people approach me asking when the community funded GPU optimisation project is starting, they wanted to donate.

It just might work.

I'll be sending a donation shortly, as soon as my wallet syncs.  I've only got a 7950 (5.045MHs) and 7990 (12.65 MHs).  I gained 7.2 MHs overall.  I'll be sending 0.003 BTC as a donation now (3 days extra profits), and possibly more in the future.  Also, Wolf0's official version gets me 1% more speed than the leaked one.

@Wolf0 any chance of getting a Cape Verde X11 version?

edit: Donation sent

Wolf0 - do you have a Darkcoin wallet? For those altcoiners like me ))

I've got a 7770.  I can test it for you if you want.

Thank you for this kernels. The X11 and X15 ones gave me some increase, but the X13 one gives me an error with the variables when it is compiling. Have you corrected it?

But have you released your kernels? Or not? BTW nice work!

Strange but the stolen bin is little bit faster for me.

Pitcairn coming soon?
 :)

why do my own .bin files have "bclp"  at the end ?

blake compact and luffa parallel in your config

Thanks to Wolf0 and LovesToShare.
Here same problem X13 can't be compile.
I will make a donation to Wolf0.
P.S. Has someone a marucoin-modTahitigw64 bin file compile with the optimize kernel ?

I disagree... I think there would be less incentive if you presented yourself as a professional looking for compensation for work you've done and giving us a end product to work with (such as a miner). Then doing something like a 5% or even 2% dev fee on top of it. At 2% people would use it regardless because they're doing the right thing. I can't do the right thing at 3 BTC when I'm close to having to sell everything off.

Instead you're telling us to sully off if we aren't willing to pay 3 BTC because we're apparently not worthy. Now no one is going to pay for a dev fee (because it's leaked, the miner doesn't exist, and you made it evident you don't like us if we don't have money for you).

I've seen the darkcoin mod, it also had like a 10% or 15% dev fee if I remember right.

Why wouldn't I bitch about someone wrecking the community for personal profit? It runs along the same lines of ASICs and we all know how much GPU miners love those.


Now putting that aside, we'll have faster hashrates for roughly a week and we'll all be back in the same boat only with 15% higher power usage - net loss. The only thing this is a win against is Nvidia I suppose as they're still operating at half the power usage.

To fix X13 kernel compilation:


or just download:

http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=21763187586152223354

I was sad because I couldn't afford your mod, but understood you're position on giving away free. my 7950 does 5.1mh now. I will donate some btc as well, you deserve it. txid to follow

edit: https://blockchain.info/tx/08d8f2dee85b779d13bcc3ed7c9a4771fe8484cffc7eb9a7467700cf9db8a439

if you got a boost, atleast toss him a few bucks.

I did not want to work, I'll sit on the old version

Wolf0 thank you very much, you are a talented person

Is there a reason not to use blake compact and luffa parallel or is it just that the bins that were leaked were not made with those settings turned on?

Copy all of the .cl files from the zip posted earlier to your kernel directory, then modify marucoin-mod.cl, should work.

Aren't the changes to these algorithms more or less like what was previously done for x11, several small kernels vs one big one.?

Hi guys, I cant configure new wolf miner, I appreciate any help :).
I using smos linux for mining, I put new wolf0 bin file and reneme it, but still getting same hashrate with Asus 7950 cards, around 3,2mhs.
Does somebody know what I am doing wrong?

This is my config file (Asus 7950 cards):
],
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"api-listen" : true,
"expiry" : "28",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"shares" : "0",  
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-engine" : "1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "8",
"intensity" : "18",
"xintensity" : "0",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-target" : "65",
"temp-overheat" : "75",
"temp-cutoff" : "80",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1792",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192"
}

Is this correct bin file for my cards?

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-x11Tahitigw64l8ku0.bin

What can be problem then? I notice, when I erase old .bin file and put new one, after restarting rig old .bin file shows up again on same place, and then I have 2 bin files in same folder, miner using old bin file ofc...

This is what I'd try: Remove all bins from folder.  Start miner.  Stop after first hash. Copy name of bin file just created. Rename new bin with that bin name you just created.  Do not have del *.bin in .bat file.  Try that.

Like you said, I removed all bin files. After restarting rig, new  .bin file was created, then I put new one in and rename it. After that I restarted mining but nothing happens, mining not starting....

wolf
your .bin is working very good for me for X11
do you have the same for X13 ?
mining with 1 280x (which can't run f@h)

ok.. so i'll just mine X11 for now :)
thank you

@wolf Yep, when I created new bin file, I put "worksize" : "64", then I replace old bin file with your bin file, and keep worksize 64. I tried this on second rig and doesnt work too. Do I maybe need to change kernel folder or something? This is frustrating :)

Do you happen to have blake compact or luffa parallel in your configs?  Correct me if I'm wrong but I think you need to take those out as the Wolf0's bins don't have those activated, at least for x11.  I'm not sure if that would prevent you from mining though, just a thought. 

is that 4.1 for both cayman cores or is it per core? I suspect  it is the former.
Why 4 threads? I experimented with 4 threads and did not see any difference.

I tried those briefly and I find them to be about 5% slower than lovestoshare's shit on Tahiti. What other params are you using besides xI=64 TC=8192, g=2?

Nice work Wolf0!
How much u should get with 280x at 1100/1500 ?
Currently ~6.4MH/s.

I don't know why but I m getting tons of HW errors no matter what I do.
Edit: Hm strange it was related to the pool not to my settings or anything else. As long as this specific pool detects change of difficulty it throws HW errors on my side. On other pools it's working fine.

280x hynix got 6.4-6.6mhs 14.xx drivers, clocks 1100 mem 1500
sgminer.exe -k darkcoin-mod --xintensity 128 --worksize 64 -g 4 --lookup-gap 2

any chance in seeing a performance increase with the newest amd omega driver that just came out?  i know alot of games saw big increases in performance i was wondering if that will translate to mining (assuming a miner that works will come out soon or someone has got theres working.)

Thanks a million Wolf!  ;D

Looking forward to donating some of my earnings.

Not a good .bin for my 7950 : 6500k with Wolf0's bin (w64) against 7000k with sgminer's bin (w256).
These pre-generated bins never work fine on my config  ;D

Hi, I heard rumors of sgminer improvement for X11 and congratulations on your breakthrough. I've sent you 3 Darkcoins, which isn't much, but I only have one AMD card used for everything it only mines when I not gaming and the improvement will make an extra 12 Darkcoins next year and I've sent 25% of that to you for your accomplishment.

I will add the new Omega AMD drivers have lower hashrate, I'm getting 6.5-6.7mhs on X11. However, they do have big increases for gaming.

14.7 Amd Drivers I am getting 7.45mhs with a R9 290 at default settings. No overclocking 947mhz gpu and 1250mhz mem.

Hello, I use this config for 290x --xintensity 64 -w 64 --gpu-threads 2, and it give 8.2 - 8.3 mh. Does someone has better config for better speed?

Down are kernels and generated bins for X algos(11, 13, 15):

http://www.filedropper.com/x111315kernels
http://www.filedropper.com/x111314bins

Complete decision including last version of sgminer and all this kernels&bins&configuration file you can use:
http://www.filedropper.com/sgminer-51-dev-2014-mod

If you like to compile yourself you can download from:
https://github.com/sgminer-dev

This kernel&bins are for Tahiti&Hawaii. I have no Kaiman and Pitcairn to test.
After the test if you're satisfied you can tip me here: 13FykK1WoEwXV1WvrjT1hDRi1E1gFaBT8y
And Wolf0, of course!

Thanks, it works.

Can you give me the latest bins files? Or it is a private developing?

It's cool ))

Tell me please which of the miner is faster x86 or x64?

Ok, can you give me please your config for x11?

x13 working! And working well! Thanks for sharing!

What hash rate on x13?

Hi, I'll give you my numbers:

14.7 Drivers R9 290, no overclock and powertune 20%

X11= 7.55-7.60mhs
X13= 5.20-5.30mhs
X15= 4.10-4.20mhs

Without bins or kernels still work fine like Neoscrypt (295-300khs).

Thank You, I would send IbnBattuta 1 Darkcoin, but he's not listed a Darkcoin address! Please list one?

I've already sent Wolf0 3 Darkcoins for X11 bin and Kernal. Not sure how much I will use X13 and X15!

Can you show your config for x13 and x15 mod?

Only you have this mod?

X13

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://????????",
      "user" : "1NQTVGPop7fYw1D7U?????????",
      "pass" : "xx"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"worksize" : "64",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

X15

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp:???????????",
      "user" : "1NQTVGPop7fYw1D7U2??????????",
      "pass" : "xx"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"worksize" : "64",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Hope that helps?

Yes, that is true, but any increase is better then nothing and I did send you 3 Darkcoins for finding these improvements even when "LovesToShare" did the original X11 kernel and bin leak? Furthermore, if you only own 1 AMD mining card, these increases are only worth and extra $30 a year (8 cent a day) - mining on such a scale is more akin to hobbyist.

Thank You

thevictimofuktyranny thank you

Unfortunately, stealing people's discoveries or knowledge is a disease at the heart of modern day culture, a cancer that has eaten every nation's soul away. Everyone becomes so ungrateful, these days, when knowledge improvements cost them any amount of money. Yet, these very same people are willing to pay over the odds for mobiles phone or houses or cars? I think people resent the fact that a knowledge discovery boasting rights remains with finder, whilst overpriced toy-things allow the buyer to boast? LOL, people are so ridiculous in their vanities.

Thank You

Hi,

Does anyone use Coinotron.com, what is with up their automated payments?

Sometimes they payout don't pay out for 12 plus hours?

Yet their own website say automatic payment every 2 hours?

270x is no speed? Thank you

Your cards 280x ot 290 may reach 10M on x13, but peoople are interested what their card can do! So don't tell us what your cards do but give us the binaries!

How high is your 290x clocked to achieve 7.1Mh/s? Also, what driver version? Any reason to use any sort of TC setting? I know you have the latest kernel and bin files.

I am able to reach 6.48Mh/s running xi 64 g 2 w 64 on a 290x with Elpidia clocked at 1100mhz core and 1450 memory. Win8.1 driver 14.11.1 Beta.

I will post my 7970 and 7950 results soon.

Thanks for the info and x11 bins. I will donate some btc soon.

Hi,

It is R9 290 and not a R9 290X.

Just want to check, you deleted the standard kernel and replaced it with the modified Kernel, place the modified bin (darkcoin-modHawaiigw64l4ku0) into sgminer folder, because your numbers looked like normal figures for R9 290X, which is around 5.68, but with your overclocks it would be around 6.48mhs, which tells me you running the wrong Kernel or bin? Maybe, you need to recheck those 1st steps again.


The best AMD Drivers are older 14.7rc1, can be downloaded from http://www.guru3d.com/files-get/amd-catalyst-14-7-rc1-(14-200-1004-july-9)-download,1.html

You may need to clean out all old drivers traces from the other versions with this extra tool after you do the AMD Catalyst uninstall: http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/display-driver-uninstaller-download.html

The latest Omega drivers only achieved 6.7mhs and the same for the later 14.7rc3 AMD drivers on my GPU!

However, I do reinstall Windows 7 64 bit every of month or two (my PC's gets hacked every couple of weeks and need re-installation, LOL); these results are achieved on a 2 week old install of Windows 7 64. A friend gets about 22% lowers hasrates on everything he mines on X11 and neoscrypt on 4 month old Windows 7 installation.

I think that covers everything.

Thank You

My quoted post was for Wolf0.

You don't seem awfully surprised your kernels were leaked. Or are these separate work?

Props. Great work. Any plans on release your official x13 bins files or just going to leave the leaked one be? Either way great work and best of luck.

guys I need help, I can not start this miner wolf0 sGMiner-5.1-dev-2014-hack, I created the .bat file but just start the fans go crazy and off the pc, help me because I'm pretty denied this, if someone can write the configuration of your bat file, so I copy it and change user and pass.

thank you very much :'( :'(

nothing to do, this miner has problems, I tried to change drivers with clean uninstall, I put the drivers 14.7rc1, 14.9. 14:12 omega, always the same thing, after 5 minutes, the display driver has stopped working and it was restored, I meant to wolf0 how do you reach 10 mb of 290x ??
I have 3 cards r9 290x oc tri X, but nothing to do always go crash, I had asked for help if someone compiled a batch file, so I changed my user and pass and put my, but are days that I do not receive response, if any good soul who wants to use the bat file write its configuration'd thank him a lot.

i need help ??? ???

Hi Marvykkio,

There is nothing special you need to put in your .bat file or .conf file (whichever method you prefer) other than starting sgminer with following options: (I write this from memory so please check by issuing "sgminer -h" to see all the options.):

Option	Comment
--kernel darkcoin-mod	or whatever kernel you use. Wolf0 has slightly better kernels than anyone else although decent kernels can be found in this forum
--thread-concurrency 8192	tipical number for X11
--gpu-autofan	so that GPU fan speed is set automatically depending on GPU temperature
--gpu-powertune 20	50 for some cards, probably yours, which prevents GPU from throttling down due to excessive power usage
-xI 64	or -I 18 whichever you prefer and are comfortable with
-g 2	to start 2 CPU threads per GPU to feed data to it
-w 64	to set the workgroup size. Really you should use the Internet to find out what these mean and how sg/cgminer works.
-o URL -u username -p pass	these are standard...

Now reason your driver stops and is then restarted as you say (sometimes restarts incorrectly and you need to reboot to regain proper hashrate) is almost always due to excessive clock speeds and when you "undervolt" cards too much. Also when lifetime of your PSU is near it's end (usually after a year of 24/7 mining) it will not deliver same voltage any more and this will manifest itself as excessive undervolting as well.

Most of the miners constantly battle with this issue and are happy if it happens once a week or so, or they live with 10%-20% lower hash rate, but have enhanced stability.

Now 10MH/s is probably too much to ask for from a 290X. In my experience, with decent kernels close to 9 MH/s is achievable. I personally mined at 8.7 and very low voltage.

Try this download of sgminer from Crypto-mining blogg

http://cryptomining-blog.com/page/11/

It is set up with figures for running a R9 280x at NiceHash and Westhash (hashrate selling/buying site in BTC), but I know the sgminer.exe (application) does work (I'm using it on my R9 290). Their are some sgminer.exe downloads that simply do not work. I think some people enjoy posting broken SGminer applications on forums to mess with the less knowledgeable miners.

Delete it's Kernel and replace with the modified kernel, place the Hawaii WOLF0's bins in it. Delete the Nicehash/Westhash configuration file and replace with the new config file and run the exe/application.

This particular SGminer.exe will not be able to mine Neoscrypt or Nist5 or Lyra2 aftwerwards, but I think you're only interested in X11 and X13?  

Last option, is always to try a clean installation of Windows 7 64?

So what are the best numbers you guys get for x13 on 7950 and 280x ?

Thanks !

Please, share optimized bin for x15
Thanks!

Did a zip of the bin on a free upload website:

http://www.filedropper.com/bitblockhawaiigw64l4ku0big4

Sgminer conf:  "algorithm" : "bitblock",
worksize is "64"

Would be possible generate or download bin's for bonaire chipset? (7790,...)
Thank you in advance.

Does anyone have a working link for the x15 bins??

Will i be able to use any of the Wolf0 bins with the new AMD R9 GPU:s ?
Their family name is "Hawaii Pro"
I am interested in buying either R9 390 or the R9 390x

Great !
I guess the hashrate on the 390 card is about the same as 290 ? Around 10Mhs with your bin ?

Thanks for releasing the bins to the public btw !
Really great work.

Yes.

Well haven't been mining for a while. Bought an r9 390 for gaming and I also played with mining. Using Wolf0's improved kernels and sgminer 5.1.1 gettting a sad 2.9 MH on x11. Is there an obvious cause for this and I can't see it? Never had problems with Nvidia...

Hi Wolf0!

I don't think so. Using the regular bins I got 2.3 MHs, with yours I get 2.9. Ah, maybe the drivers are somehow screewy. I guess a system format is imminent.

https://www.virustotal.com/cs/url/1a64a12182615b121633fd28e5cf6cbfe88997d4d94e5fa3df13098c20a1c3a1/analysis/1450360532/
http://quttera.com/detailed_report/ottrbutt.com
https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/index.html#url=ottrbutt.com

So I uninstalled crimson and installed 15.7. It's actually 0.1 MH/s worse. Ah fuck it. I'll let you know if a complete system reinstall did the trick.

Well, did it?

Yeah I did a dualboot yust to try it. Still the same. Tried X13 getting 330 kH. Maybe my cpu doesn't support certain instructions. I'ts i7 860.

I am running  1 Radeon R9 390x with the 8 gig ddr5,    sgminer-5-1-0-optimized gives me 15 to 25 MH/s on x11==== 22 to 30 MH/x on quark ====== 20+ Lyra2REv2 ............

stats came from nicehash miner config ,

--gpu-platform 0 -k quarkcoin --url=stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050 --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --nfactor 10 --xintensity 1024 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 2 --device 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--gpu-platform 0 -k x11 --url=stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:3336 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050  --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --nfactor 10 --xintensity  640 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 1 --device 0 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 --gpu-platform 0 -k Lyra2REv2 --url=stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.usa.nicehash.com:3347 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050  --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --nfactor 10 --xintensity  160 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 2 --device 0
==================================================================================================================================================================
sgminer-5-1-0-optimized these are over clocked stats that work very fast .

{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####,
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "darkcoin-mod",
  "device": "0",
  "xintensity": "1200",
  "thread-concurrency": "524288",
  "shaders": "286500",
  "worksize": "64",
  "lookup-gap": "4",
  "gpu-threads": "2",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "90",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "50",
  "shares": "0",
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-listen": true,
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4050",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "expiry": "28",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "8",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "2",
  "scan-time": "0",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
  "pools": [
    {
      "name": "nameofpool",
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####",
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x",
      "algorithm": "quarkcoin",
      "thread-concurrency": "0"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "quarkcoin",
  "device": "all",
  "lookup-gap": "2",
  "xintensity": "2200",
  "shaders": "286500",
  "thread-concurrency": "524288",
  "worksize": "256",
  "gpu-threads": "2",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "85",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1",
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4028",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "expiry": "24",
  "failover-switch-delay": "300",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "log-show-date": true,
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "no-submit-stale": true,
  "queue": "1",
  "scan-time": "1",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####",
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "Lyra2REv2",
  "device": "0",
  "xintensity": "500",
  "thread-concurrency": "0",
  "worksize": "64",
  "gpu-threads": "1",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "90",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-listen": true,
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4050",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "expiry": "28",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "1",
  "scan-time": "7",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The R9 390x (Hawaii) 1060 (1150) Core Clock (MHz) 2816 Stream Processors 512 Bit Memory 6000(1525) (MHz)I am only running it on a 286 buss ,can not find info out how to find motherboard with a 512 bus,so this is not all this gpu can do .live hash when running quark http://rig.rent/rigs/26727

I am running  1 Radeon R9 390x with the 8 gig ddr5,    sgminer-5-1-0-optimized gives me 15 to 25 MH/s on x11==== 22 to 30 MH/x on quark ====== 20+ Lyra2REv2 ............

stats came from nicehash miner config ,

--gpu-platform 0 -k quarkcoin --url=stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050 --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --nfactor 10 --xintensity 1024 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 2 --device 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--gpu-platform 0 -k x11 --url=stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:3336 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050  --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --nfactor 10 --xintensity  640 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 1 --device 0 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 --gpu-platform 0 -k Lyra2REv2 --url=stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.usa.nicehash.com:3347 --userpass=user.user:x --api-listen --api-port=4050  --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --gpu-fan 30-95 --temp-cutoff 95 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-target 75 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --nfactor 10 --xintensity  160 --thread-concurrency    0 --worksize  64 --gpu-threads 2 --device 0
==================================================================================================================================================================
sgminer-5-1-0-optimized these are over clocked stats that work very fast .

{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####,
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "darkcoin-mod",
  "device": "0",
  "xintensity": "1200",
  "thread-concurrency": "524288",
  "shaders": "2816",
  "worksize": "64",
  "lookup-gap": "4",
  "gpu-threads": "2",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "90",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "50",
  "shares": "0",
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-listen": true,
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4050",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "expiry": "28",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "8",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "2",
  "scan-time": "0",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
  "pools": [
    {
      "name": "nameofpool",
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####",
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x",
      "algorithm": "quarkcoin",
      "thread-concurrency": "0"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "quarkcoin",
  "device": "all",
  "lookup-gap": "2",
  "xintensity": "2200",
  "shaders": "2816",
  "thread-concurrency": "524288",
  "worksize": "256",
  "gpu-threads": "2",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "85",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1",
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4028",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "expiry": "24",
  "failover-switch-delay": "300",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "log-show-date": true,
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "no-submit-stale": true,
  "queue": "1",
  "scan-time": "1",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://pool:####",
      "user": "user",
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "Lyra2REv2",
  "device": "0",
  "xintensity": "500",
  "thread-concurrency": "0",
  "worksize": "64",
  "gpu-threads": "1",
  "gpu-fan": "30-95",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "90",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin",
  "api-listen": true,
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4050",
  "auto-fan": true,
  "auto-gpu": true,
  "gpu-powertune": "20",
  "expiry": "28",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "0",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "log": "5",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "1",
  "scan-time": "7",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The R9 390x (Hawaii) 1060 (1150) Core Clock (MHz) 2816 Stream Processors 512 Bit Memory 6000(1525) (MHz)I am only running it on a 286 buss ,can not find info out how to find motherboard with a 512 bus,so this is not all this gpu can do .live hash when running quark http://rig.rent/rigs/26727

Now i am with R9 390 8GB Nitro. I use wolf0 hawaii 64 worksize bin and your config for 390X and my hashrate is 7-8Mh for X11. What is wrong!! I use sgminer 5.3.0 - fixed

Well, not a lot of development work has gone on since this thread was started and new AMD drivers have been issued, which don't work with new drivers.

However, if you use AMD Driver 15.12.

You can mine Ethereum algo, which is available for another 2 months, before it goes over to POS.

Hashing is about 24mhs and at Nicehash it is paying 0.36BTC per gigahash or 0.00864BTC per day with you card.

Or, you can  mine it directly, to keep the ethereum as a future investment at Coinotron or Supernova or Nanopool.

The miner is available on this link for Windows 64 bit version:

http://cryptomining-blog.com/7603-the-latest-ethminer-0-9-41-genoil-1-0-6-for-windows/

Then, in 2 months, their should be more development work on Sgminer, for many algos and the latest AMD drivers.

Good Luck

I think the PoS will happen later this year or early next year. It will not be PoS in two months as far as I know.

with nicehash miner 1.3 ver my r9 390 8gb has 12Mhash/s on x11 algo. when i power r9 390 with r9 285 2gb tonga gpu at the same time with miner the hashrate of 390 reduce to 7 Mhash/s and the tonga is 2.5Mhas/s.
i tried bin from wolf0 for tonga and hawaii with no effects. does anyone know about this ?

295x2 X13

2-3Mh *2

sgminier windows this correct? or more speed someway?
edit yeah something is wrong, speed didt slow when i start 2 sgminers x11/x13
http://postimg.org/image/e0w1k6p53/

Yeah, with current AMD drivers it is around 5.75mhs X13 and 7.6mhs X11 for a R9 290.

However, if you want to get back to the old hashing figures with those modded bins, you will need to go back to using the old AMD drivers that they were written to work with.

Which is 13-12 up to 14-9 AMD drivers.

With the modded bins, it was 10mhs X11 and 7mhs X13 with a 7.4% overclock on my R9 290.

And, those bins were designed for the Windows based operating systems, so they won't work on Linux.

now i am with two r9 390 and catalyst software 15.7.1. i use nicehash miner v.1.3.0.1 and my hashrate is 14Mh per gpu. i dont use mod bins from wolf0.
should i change driver to 14 ?

Checked those drivers and they work fine. No idea about what the top hash on that card!

Just wait a while. It will be released for free. No need to pay

Will i be able to use any of the Wolf0 bins with the new AMD R9 GPU:s ?
Their family name is "Hawaii Pro"
I am interested in buying either R9 390 or the R9 390x