Binance deferred Quarkchain's listing for almost a day. Before that, all investors (most of them) started their tokens on Binance. And what happened? Trade began everywhere, and Binance said - "Sorry, we've changed our mind, wait for the news." Investors could not get the Quarkchain tokens from the stock exchange, some chaos began. After 16 hours, Binance still made an announcement and then in 24 h. launched a trade.
But, one big BUT! The moment was missed, a big price increase did not happen. X13 is nothing compared to what was expected and what kind of testing circles had to be passed all investors.
I don't understand why you write about delisting? This Binance must give back the money to Quarkchain because of the delay in the listing. They did not fulfill the promised conditions.

And if there was no growth, would you lose $ 6,000? I understand this is a short-term investment.
Here the whole point is, what is the amount for the investor is safe? I can afford to lose no more than 500 - 1000 dollars on 1 transaction, ICO. If I believe in a project, then I can afford to wait a year if the amount of investment is not large. However, here it is said about 6000 for a short time and you didn't wait. U sold with a minimum profit. This suggests that this is a fairly large amount for you, you are not ready to take risks and waste part of the investment. Investments are not only a "potential" profit of 10,000, but also large losses. There are a lot of examples, the last - Titanium.

This is actually very small. I always thought it was important to invest for a long time. But in the case of altcoins, this really doesn't work more than 90%.
All have become accustomed to the fact that after ICO you need to wait for a good pump and sell everything because in six months everyone will forget about this project. This is a very bad trend. I didn't understand why people after ICO quickly sell everything. And it turns out that less than 8% can be left for the long term. I thought the survivors were much more. In my last year's investments, only NEO survived a year later. This is sad.

I had a slightly different situation. I have registered several times to participate in ICO. I passed KYC for the whitelist.
 However, it subsequently turned out that all tokens were sold on private sales. All who were in the whitelist were not able to participate in ICO, but got the airdrop. If you require KYC for airdrop, then evaluate the project. Maybe the game isn't worth the candle.

Firstly, you need to understand the code to write smart contracts.
In a smart contract, you can specify any conditions under which certain actions will occur. For example. Ether that enters this purse is less than 1 Ether - sent back to the sender. All amounts that are greater than 1 Ether remain in the wallet and in return certain tokens are sent. Here you need to set a certain rate 1Ether = 100 tokens.
However, there are many nuances. It is necessary to provide for the withdrawal of tokens from the contract in the event of an unforeseen situation. If there is an error in the code, then additional conditions (insurance) are required.

These are securities and not a cryptocurrency. The US government has long wanted to recognize Ripple as securities. US exchanges aren't listing this coin. However, according to rumors, developers Ripple offered owners of exchanges up to $ 1 million in fiat. But no one agreed.
All investors Ripple are puppets in the hands of the owner. This has nothing to do with decentralization.

If we talk about individual tokens, then yes, some overestimate & pump. Speaking about the market as a whole, I don't think that now the market is overvalued, it's not December 2017.
Now, all over the crypto world, we can probably talk about underestimation of some good projects. These projects are simply lost in the crowd of noise and HYIP.

Well, I don't know. There are two sides. Regulation is necessary so this chaos with ICOs is over. But on the other hand, I think small investors will be closed to the world of investment in the cryptocurrency. Already, the trend is toward the fact that many large and promising projects refuse small sales since all tokens are bought out by large whales-investors.
My voice is against regulation.

I would say that this is Binance. But did you see what they did today? They canceled the listing of QuarkChain (QKC).
This is my favorite exchange. But the last time they do everything they want. A vote is taken, then all the leaders are removed from the vote. Announce the time and date of listing a new coin, but then all cancel. I do not even know what will happen next, but I do not like the vector by which they move.

You didn't say what kind of project you are talking about. I know a couple of projects that collected money for ICO, then for a long time, they developed their own platform, and only after six months they listed the tokens to investors. Sometimes the way from investing money to getting tokens is quite long.
But maybe you fell into the hands of scammers and you have been fooled. Specify which project, then you will get a more accurate answer to your question.

This is contrary to the principles of economics. The national currency (cryptocurrency) should be stable with minimal fluctuations in inflation. The market is not stable. I don't know of any stable cryptocurrency.
If countries will introduce national cryp.currency, then it will be centralized coins.
Do you want to get wages for a month, come to the store and buy only a pint of milk per all the money because the market has fallen?

Yes, there is some truth in your words. Thanks for the link.

I'm looking at the ratings. Of course, the rating doesn't say that in a month you will get a lot of money. In the rating, you see the analysis of the project and the potential. I have not seen successful projects with a rating of 2/10. The rating doesn't predict the price on the market, so with the help of the rating, you cannot predict the future.
In the code can find and not fix the vulnerability, the project can be attacked by hackers, perhaps someone from the team will be a fraud. Rating is an analysis, sometimes erroneous and not deep, but it is not 100% indicator of ToTheMoon.

The fact is that when people say - the market as a whole has fallen and depreciated and coins lost in value this is not what they think. These people don't really mean the whole market, they talk about their experience, about their specific tokens, about their specific investments in specific projects.
People rarely evaluate in a global sense. Everyone considers his losses and profits personally.
Yes, the outlook is generally positive. I think that this growth of capitalization was achieved partly due to the appearance of new projects.

I didn't invest in this project. But I read a lot about it. The project had high ratings and I don't remember a single red flag. The team that takes part in the development cannot affect the price. Even if they don't sleep and will work 24/7 then the price will not grow.
I have a lot of coins from different ICO's that have been very depreciated. These are not fraudulent projects. Simply they were unlucky, they came to the falling market. It happens.

All EOS owners must read an important notice from the company. It remains only 2 days before the end of registration. I will leave here references to the mention if some investors have not seen.

https://twitter.com/eos_io
https://block.one/news/important-notice-for-address-registration/

About the price, I would not be so optimistic. It depends on the market in general, not only on the good work of developers.

You probably don't know anything about the war. And I wish you will never know what it is.
If there really will be a Third World War ..... Well, I don't think that the Internet at all will be or electricity in general. If people are refugees, very often they lose (in fires, shelling) even documents that prove their identity. I'm not sure that everyone will be able to take with them passwords or portable wallets.
During the war, real estate, cars are depreciating, inflation is growing by a million times, I don't know about cryptocurrency, it can in principle depreciate greatly, or, conversely, the price increase & it becomes a unique asset.
It's so scary, I can not even convey it to you with words. We all need to pray that this does not happen.

Hello. I'm an investor SelfKey. I like the idea, I follow all the news. It even released a beta test just recently. But I can not understand what's going on with the price?
The development team is working and capitalization is declining. Maybe someone has ideas on this. Or you heard some rumors, something.
I will be grateful for the answers.

Since January, I've read so many different predictions. These are absolutely diametrical opinions. Some predict a fall, others promise incredible heights. I think the first and the others are wrong. Now no one knows what factors will affect the market in the future, no one knows what will happen tomorrow.
One thing is clear to me at 100% - bastards bankers have come close to cryptocurrency. They buy up various exchanges, invest large sums in projects to manipulate prices, they have good marketers to manipulate public opinion.

There are projects that don't pay even investors for 6 months. I'm not even talking about bounty. Some finish their own platform, test, fix bugs. You just have to wait until the developers have completed and released the coins. Not necessarily your project is a scam. Since you didn't name the project.
The only advice that I can give you is to pay attention to company managers. Bounty managers with a good reputation close bounty company with the first red flags and warn the participants about the problems. Good luck to you.

I haven't visited this stock exchange for a long time. There are a lot of pretty good alternatives. I had problems with withdrawing money 3 times. Therefore, I refused to use this exchange. But somebody likes to trade there, maybe they get used to it.


From this point of view, I didn't think. Probably they are because of this introduce KYC. To get rid of bots.