In some cases there are traders who are disappointed when trading alt with BTC pair, even though the order succeeded in profit, their balance actually dropped dramatically due to a decrease in BTC prices.

if the problem is like this, traders must start having to trade more often with usdt pairs. op needs to explain further experience because speculation and predictions alone are not enough to deal with short-term trends.

I think this is purely a technical problem from internal exchange, and should be resolved as soon as possible.
I read about locking up assets for 20 days in their local community (telegram):



it's better for dev to make an announcement on their official ann thread. so that this problem can be solved correctly.

because i deal with activities as a daily trader, i trade altcoin with btc pairs every day, so indirectly i also hold btc in the long run because it only sets aside 1% of profit into stable coins.

I am not particularly interested in the HYIP platform which doubles BTC as a system attraction. trade is still the most important point.

whether for the purpose of passive assets for the next 5-10 years, or for active trading? if it's passive, it's better to hold bitcoin and the rest diversify to 3 strong altcoins like eth, neo and xrp only.

If you are familiar with stocks, automatically you will not be too difficult to adapt to the volatility of crypto, your step is right because after halving, maybe crypto will not return at a cheap price like now.

The sign appeared on the 18th and 23rd yesterday, you can see bitcoin at $7,700 and then experience a retracement. The end of the year is still less than a week and there is still enough time to see how the market responds back to $8,000.

The decline is reasonable since the 25th because it has become an agenda where every trader sells assets to celebrate Christmas. there is still gradual speculation in the next two or three days.

I also think the same, because no TOS has changed, only stronger toward sentiment towards massive reporting actions, YouTube removes video content that leads to bitcoin buying suggestions, or suggestions and guidelines for other crypto investments.

YouTube is still in a position to prevent, but it doesn't make sense to consider that the deleted content is considered to be in the harmful category, they need further research on this.

my country only supports crypto as a commodity, automatically there is nothing I can do to link it to currencies. many things are still relative and fiat are still the main economic protocols.

crypto is technology, and I talk about the potential of decentralization. I support it in the aspect of global investment. This will not end by determining which currency is better, but to what extent fiat and crypto can continue to moderate the development of world economy.

We will see various media will relate it to conspiracy theories and write as a small apocalypse part of a fairly revolutionary investment trend. Mass panic will suddenly become a trend, but all holders will realize that so far they have been involved with something that has no regulation and legality.

They can not take any legal steps to the exchange and wallet services, will only end up being a regret for life even though they are not only focused on crypto.

Big risk taking also depends on courage, usually because it has gone through a variety of experiences, I imagine how many people go bankrupt just because they risk everything without being influenced by the power factor in dealing with risk.

there are still many opportunities to use large capital, I'm sure every day there are still many people who laugh with the results of trading crypto margins, especially bitcoin. This is not just about patience, but opportunity.

The great progress this year can be concluded only from the successful development of coins after IEO, but on average all of them are only included in the lower middle class coin category.

Every year from now there will not be many interesting things like when litecoin/xrp first appeared, it has become a general principle that large adoption will have an impact on quality degradation on every new project due to the lack of ideas that make a big difference, but I believe there are still many developers who postpone their big projects until the bitcoin hype reappears.

I feel that the fundraising that the OP wants is made like IEO because it writes about tokens that can be used as a discount media for the main products, and what I think is not using exchanges, and standing on its own platform as seen in ICO.

My understanding in fundraising is the concept of sharing large shares and only involves angel investors. In the past, some ICOs did things like this, they separated internal tokens to valuable large contributors in real business, and sold different tokens to the public for the purpose of price liquidity on the exchange market.

many people still do not use stoplimit and underestimate it, they are also too eager to use orders with maximum assets on the grounds of higher profits for each percent, the latter is lazy to understand charts with indicator variables, just by following signals or looking at charts blindly.

However, these three things must continue to be adjusted to at least face fluctuating price movements.

I actually think the government will embrace Satoshi as a partner to develop a new version of Bitcoin-Blockchain and make the government able to control half of the market circulation, and not just limited to a stable coin game.

many will claim to be satoshi, and may be more valid than craig wright. I think the government will also include him in the top secret category if it is finally found by the state intelligence agency because it is considered as a revolutionary figure who has potential to change the world economic system quickly.

he has been fighting for this patent since 2015, so it's natural that many use something similar every year. If coinbase wins this patent, it means that all other services can still use it, but by following the fixed rules of coinbase.

I still think this is no different from the branch address system, but I don't know the details. What is clear is this feature will benefit users even though they can no longer avoid KYC etc.

the price margin of each exchange has a difference with the assumption that a stronger exchange volume has a lower price. the price of each coin between exchanges will never be the same at one time, especially if it changes quickly if the difference reaches above 7%.

the only worst thing is if the transaction traffic is very large because of strong interest from a significant price difference, it requires a longer delivery time. If the asset capital sent over $ 1k will still make a profit, as long as the price does not go down due to the sudden influence of bitcoin.

controversies always occur before and during Halving, even in the past period several local banks refused user transactions simply because of the high price of bitcoin. But overall everything can be resolved normally.

what I think is that the government will take the role of at least trying to be involved in every user transaction, I am not too worried as long as all positive things can still be done smoothly despite many changes in procedures.

if capital and strategy can be connected to each other consistently, 5% daily target can be easily achieved manually, but daily trading also erodes a lot of emotion if the price drops unexpectedly.

anxiety will double because it only focuses on hourly charts and even lower. the advantage of having direct experience as you wrote is very true, I personally can also communicate directly with fellow traders to determine what can be done next.

translation?
well, fiat is also always on the verge of inflation, the use of cryptocurrency is not impossible, but it takes time. the generation process will touch the transfer of the algorithm to crypto and will still adapt the same fiat value based on official reserves.

your last few sentences may seem complicated, but the government can erase the cash payment mode starting from the area of ​​their strategic economic zone which is expanded every year, all will still hold on to the process.

it's not surprising why bitcoin concentrations tend to be higher there compared to petro, I'm surprised they cut petro reserves to only 30 million barrels.

movement in localbitcoins is also a reaction of its citizens regardless of the economic burden of embargo sanctions faced by the government. I still believe they are still noisy with panic, and don't know how long they will be able to minimize international sanctions and gradually recover.

stop loss is very important if bitcoin releases the brakes and falls down following the daily chart, for example if we buy $ 8k, then there is no other word than to wait for bitcoin to remain floating, or make a one-sided cut loss if not using it, altcoin also applies the same.

traders who set many orders will be greatly helped rather than pressing "cancel all" which is often late, but there are still other options such as OCO which can specify two directions of orders side by side.