I tried and now I see that some one manage to use it:
https://arcpool.com/site/miners
coolMiner/1.0 = Linux version
coolMiner/v.1.0 = Win

Should I have to include other files with the compiled ccminer so all can use it? or only the ccminer binary? because its work on my pc.

I have decided to use clean  latest ccminer 2.2.6 by tpruvot@github and modify it instead of brian112358@github fork, it was much more work and now it ready and I am testing it,also I have set the Max opt_retries to 5 and opt_fail_pause = 5 so it will not stuck if there is connection problem, you can also modify it in the bat file.

Hope this will fix the problems, I will update soon.

Edit:

Wow , thank you all :-).

Already working on it :-)
What you are describing is very similar to this so I have downloaded the  V2.0 as suggested and editing it, I think in 1~3 hours it will be ready and I will update the thread- sry for the trouble.
https://github.com/brian112358/nevermore-miner/issues/12

Thanks :-).


Are you on ccminer/coolMiner-v1.1?

Are you mining on NiceHash? if so the connection problems are back on my rig too, and this on version without fee, so it should not be fee time problem.
Also what is "XnSub" for? can it cause problems or solve problems?


Edit: I see others have problems like you have described(I use his fork).
https://github.com/brian112358/nevermore-miner/issues/12

I will try to check his code and try the use older verssion

Thanks, I will also keep monitoring to find out if it crashes and what could cause it, also I even tried -i 18 on 1080Ti and got same hash-rate like on -i 21, so there is no real advantage using such high intensity on this miner.
This is because the changes that I made regarding lyra2Z_cpu_hash_32 and blake256_cpu_hash_80 launches, on ccminer you loose about 1.5%-2% on 21 vs 18 intensity, on coolMiner the hash-rate stays the ~same.

Edit:I have tested it:
-i 16 vs -i 21: ccminer ~8% penalty vs coolMiner ~3% penalty .
-i 17 vs -i 21: ccminer ~4% penalty vs coolMiner ~1.5% penalty .
You can test it yourself.

Sry to hear that, have you considered lowering the intensity? 21 is high and gives no real speed gain even over 19, and only can increase the latency from the point if find nonce until it need to completes hashing  (-i 21 =2097152) , this is why I asked about it, I think that the lowest intensity possible without impacting the hash-rate should be the best option, correct me if I am wrong.

Lets start by lowering the intensity to 19.75, I have the best experience with that.

I think there is some stability issue, can you share your clock speeds and intensity used?

coolMiner-x64 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://angrypool.com:<PORT> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p <OPTIONS> -i 19  --hide-diff

Set the Intensity (-i 19) accordingly to  what u like.

Thanks,

I was wondering about the Intensity and I thought to ask you all, What do you think is better: Highest intensity stable or the lowest intensity that does not decrease the hash-rate?

It's easy to test, you can compile the ccminer with Cuda 9.2 and check yourself :-).
Yes I did modify the kernels  in cuda_lyra2Z.cu  and also some changes in  lyra2Z.cu, other changes are in ccminer.cpp + few files regarding MAX_GPUS .

P.S, on what intensity you are running the cards? I saw in benchmarks that some miner leave it on the default 16, it's very low for cards like 1060 and up and the hash-rate is low, min should be 18.
https://angrypool.com/bench

RIF86 - I have increased the CYCLE_TIME by 20%, so now instead switching pool every 40~50 min its should be hr~.


Update:
Download:
New Version V1.1 - Now supports "-p stats" to  submit your results to yiimp pools :-) :
https://nofile.io/f/wFpqPs0MB9v/coolMiner-x64-v1-1.zip

Made it work :-), Compiling again now and will update the download link :-).
I love to bench LOL.

What should I do to make "-p stats" working on the pools bench? if I change the name to "ccminer/coolMiner-v.1.1" it will be supported?
Just for fun so we can compete for top of the leader-board :-).

Update:  Please update the miner to v1.1 because the first version had connection problems to Nicehash EU stratum from different areas and got stuck "retry after 5 seconds".
The new v1.1 version  will mine on Angrypool when switching to Dev Pool Dudes pool on the Fee time.
Also the CYCLE_TIME  between pool changes increase like you asked.
Please let me know if there is any more problems.

Download:
New Version V1.1:
https://nofile.io/f/odTaNRVaHPT/coolMiner-x64-v1-1.zip

About Linux:
I tried building like in those YouTube tutorials and it worked on my PC, Could you guide me to the right Linux build tutorial the will let me build in the correct way e so you all could use it? - thanks!

P.S- now the NH EU stratum seems fixed on my side and I can connect  .

OK, working on it.

I am just an human, I had to get some sleep :-),

I am not a Dev, not every one that plays with the code should be called "Dev",  we all know the real Dev's , I am just simple dude (Avengers:Infinity War?).

I am more like an Overclocker who improved the performance of the Hardware, and not a Developer because I did not developed the Hardware, I see many new closed source miners are comming out that some of them not crediting the source ccminer Devs, and you can tell in a sec on which ccminer they are built on, So let's call "Dev's" only to the real Dev's behind the great ccminer forks that we are using :-).

Sry all , I had bad week with all the MPH Zcoin drama, and now after switching to Nicehash lyra2z the bad luck is following me and I have problems using the EU stratum  .

I am happy to hear your suggestions - what lyra2z coin and Pool should I point the the miner to when switching to the Fee time?
I don't have experience with angrypool/bsod/arcpool/gos pools, which one should be more stable/reliable ?


And like I sad - if you have problems with the miner- please switch to ccminer until I compile new version without nicehash

ROFL, you made me spill my drink LOL, this is a masterpiece for signature for "Mining (Altcoins)" subforum  .

I got error even when trying to mine directly, only on EU, maybe it same Intel security patching on EU servers?

Update: it looks nicehash problem, my rig also give same error on stratum+tcp://lyra2z.eu.nicehash.com:3365.
OMG, I have no Luck mining lyra2z :-(.
for now I don't have a solution, I suggest you change back to ccminer until NH will fix their EU stratum , plus I will try to see if the Fee mechanism can be improved so it will force to switch back to main pool even if the dev pool not connecting.

Sry :-(.

I have tried to mine when you have posted it and also got error for few sec and then when tried again all good, maybe it was NH problem for few min(it mines on NH EU server)?
Please tell me if this continues, also it should get back to your pool after the dev time over- right?.
I am also running the miner to check the log later to see if got same error.

Also why the ping is so High? can you give some info?

sry for the trouble.

But they Have  found 2 block! ... Ohh wait! - they are both Orphaned!
https://insight.zcoin.io/block/973eddd13844d711073498692cdc9f2190adae43948516d6e09082545c307cc6
https://insight.zcoin.io/block/b22d4d2fc54bc4014e85362c57e00b41758b01aa55d9c4e60e012353b65a147f

Can it get any worse?...